Is High Flexion Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Safe?: Evaluation of Knee Joint Loads in the Patients During Maximal Flexion

The purpose of this study was to indicate the mechanical loads and the flexion angle at the knee during rise from maximal flexion following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty three knees were evaluated using skin marker-based motion analysis system during four different activities of daily living. The average maximum flexion was 90 degrees (34 degrees less than passive flexion) and all subjects required support for their weight to rise from maximal flexion. The external moments and the external forces at the knee during the maximal flexion were smaller than those during the stair descending activity. The results indicate that capable flexion angle for the patients following TKA is approximately 90 degrees which has smaller mechanical loads at the knee than the stair descending activity.     

Does Greater Knee Flexion Increase Patient Function and Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The purpose of this study was to determine whether high flexion leads to improved benefits in patient satisfaction, perception, and function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data were collected on 122 primary TKAs. Patients completed a Total Knee Function Questionnaire. Knees were classified as low (≤110°), mid (111°-130°), or high flexion (>130°). Correlation between knee flexion and satisfaction was not statistically significant. Increased knee flexion had a significant positive association with achievement of expectations, restoration of a “normal” knee, and functional improvement. In conclusion, although the degree of postoperative knee flexion did not affect patient satisfaction, it did influence fulfillment of expectations, functional ability, and knee perception. This suggests that increased knee flexion, particularly more than 130°, may lead to improved outcomes after TKA.     

Does Aspirin Have a Role in Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients?

The objectives of this study were to compare the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding, surgical site infection, and mortality in patients receiving aspirin or guideline-approved VTE prophylactic therapies (warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparins, synthetic pentasaccharides) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We analyzed clinical and administrative data from 93?840 patients who underwent primary TKA at 307 US hospitals over a 24-month period. Fifty-one thousand nine hundred twenty-three (55%) patients received warfarin, 37?198 (40%) received injectable agents, and 4719 (5%) received aspirin. After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, patients who received aspirin VTE prophylaxis (VTEP) had lower odds for thromboembolism compared to warfarin patients but with similar odds compared with injectable VTEP; there were no differences in risk of bleeding, infection, or mortality after adjustment. Our results suggest that aspirin, when used in conjunction with other clinical care protocols, may be effective VTEP for certain TKA patients.     

Tramadol in Knee Osteoarthritis: Does Preoperative Use Affect Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundThe 2013 American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons evidence-based guidelines recommend against the use of preoperative narcotics in the management of symptomatic osteoarthritic knees; however, the guidelines strongly recommend tramadol in this patient population. To our knowledge, no study to date has evaluated outcomes in patients who use tramadol exclusively as compared with narcotics naive patients.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data for patients who underwent unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty between January 2017 and March 2018. PRO scores were obtained using a novel electronic patient rehabilitation application, which pushed PRO surveys via email and mobile devices within 1 month prior to surgery and 3 months postoperatively.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-six patients were opiate naïve, while 63 had obtained narcotics before the index operation. Of those, 21 patients received tramadol. The average preoperative Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores were 50.4, 49.95, and 48.01 for the naïve, tramadol, and narcotic populations, respectively, (P = .60). The tramadol cohort had the least gain in 3 months postoperative Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, improving on average 12.5 points in comparison to the 19.1 and 20.1 improvements seen in the narcotic and naïve cohorts, respectively (P = .09). This difference was statistically significant when comparing the naïve and tramadol populations alone in post hoc analysis (P = .016).ConclusionsWhen comparing patients who took tramadol preoperatively to patients who were opiate naïve, patients that used tramadol trended toward significantly less improvement in functional outcomes in the short-term postoperative period.     

Does Risk Mitigation Reduce 90-Day Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty?: A Cohort Study

BackgroundWith ever-increasing demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), most healthcare systems around the world are concerned about its socioeconomic burden. Most centers have universally adopted well-defined clinical care pathways to minimize adverse outcomes, maximize volume, and limit costs. However, there are no prospective comparative trials reporting benefits of these risk mitigation (RM) strategies.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study comparing post-TKA 90-day complications between patients undergoing RM before surgery and those following a standard protocol (SP). In the RM group, we used a 20-point checklist to screen for modifiable risk factors and evaluate the need for optimizing non-modifiable comorbidities. Only when optimization goals were achieved, patients were offered TKA.ResultsTKA was performed in 811 patients in the SP group and in 829 in the RM group, 40% of which were simultaneous bilateral TKA. In both groups, hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (48%), followed by diabetes (20%). A total of 43 (5.3%) procedure-related complications were seen over the 90-day postoperative period in the SP group, which was significantly greater than 26 (3.1%) seen in the RM group (p = 0.039). The commonest complication was pulmonary thromboembolic, 6 in each group. Blood transfusion rate was higher in the SP group (6%) than in the RM group (< 1%).ConclusionsScreening and RM can reduce 90-day complications in patients undergoing TKA.     

Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Improve Short-term Recovery in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background  

Concerns have been raised regarding minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and its possible effect on postoperative functional recovery, complications, and survival rate after TKA.     

Does Tranexamic Acid Save Blood in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background  

Tranexamic acid (TEA) reportedly reduces perioperative blood loss in TKA. However, whether it does so in minimally invasive TKA is not clear.     

Varus Collapse in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Fixation or Bone Fail First?

IntroductionAseptic tibial loosening is now considered the most common reason that total knee arthroplasties (TKA) fail long term. There are unique subsets of patients that fail into varus alignment of the tibial tray with collapse of the medial proximal tibia. It is currently unknown if the implant fixation fails first or if the proximal medial tibia collapses first.MaterialsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 88 patients that were revised at our institution secondary to aseptic varus collapse of the proximal tibia. Two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons performed a retrospective analysis on sequential precollapse radiographs in each patient to determine which failed first: the implant fixation (implant-cement or cement-bone interface) or the medial proximal tibia.Discussion36/88 (40.9%) patients had a series of precollapse radiographs that could be reviewed. Failure at the implant-cement interface before varus collapse in 23 vs 22 patients, failure at the implant-cement and cement-bone interface before varus collapse in two patients, and contemporaneous failure at the implant-cement interface and varus collapse in 11 vs 12 patients were identified by reviewers one and two, respectively.ConclusionThe most frequent mechanism of failure identified was failure of the implant-cement interface followed by subsequent medial tibial varus collapse. Improving implant fixation may decrease the incidence of this unique failure mechanism. We advocate the use of supplemental stem fixation in high-risk patients and optimal cement techniques for all patients as methods of potentially avoiding tibial varus collapse, one of the most frequent modes of long-term failure.     

Does Total Knee Arthroplasty Change Frontal Plane Knee Biomechanics During Gait?

Background  

Dynamic knee varus angle and adduction moments have been reported to be reduced after TKA. However, it is unclear whether this reduction is maintained long term.     

Does Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Improve Leg Strength in Patients With a Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundBlood flow restriction (BFR) therapy has been proposed to help patients build strength with fewer repetitions than standard physical therapy (PT). We sought to determine if BFR would improve quadriceps and hamstring strength in patients with instability and perceived weakness >1 year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with painful TKAs and flexion instability as well as quadriceps and hamstring weakness who performed a 6-week PT program and received isokinetic strength measurements (ISMs). Thirty-six patients completed a standard PT program (non-BFR) and 12 patients completed a BFR regimen. ISMs were taken before and after PT to quantify quadriceps and hamstring power, torque, and work compared to the contralateral leg. Statistical analysis was conducted on pre-PT and post-PT ISMs and decisions for revision surgery.ResultsThere were no differences in ISMs after PT between the BFR and non-BFR groups. The non-BFR group showed statistically significant strength improvements in flexion but not extension (+28.7%-32.8%, P = .0145-.255). Although no significant difference was found in the BFR group, they saw improvements in all extension strength metrics (19.4%-23.4%, P = .3315-.3901) and flexion (25.7%-29.9%, P = .1994-.2392). No difference was observed between the groups in the rates of subsequent revision TKA (8.3% vs 16.7%, P = .3362).ConclusionBFR did not improve quadriceps and hamstring strength compared to PT alone in patients with instability and weakness after TKA. Over 80% of total patients chose to avoid revision TKA after completion of focused PT with or without BFR.