Efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of sildenafil citrate as treatment for erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate as treatment for erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 433 completely evaluated men with chronic erectile dysfunction were treated with sildenafil citrate. Response was assessed prospectively by baseline and followup physician interviews, and by a patient self-administered 15-item questionnaire on the domains of patient treatment response and satisfaction, partner treatment satisfaction, comparative previous treatment satisfaction, adverse effects, and patient and partner quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 304 men (70.2%) who completed the questionnaire 278 received sildenafil, including 186 who previously had undergone treatment for erectile dysfunction, principally involving intracavernous injection therapy. A response was elicited by a median dose of 100 mg. in 188 patients (67.6%) who achieved erection suitable for sexual intercourse. Those with psychogenic erectile dysfunction responded significantly better than those with organic dysfunction (p <0.001). Erection suitable for intercourse was attained by 30.8% of patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and 80% with cavernous veno-occlusive dysfunction. Of previous intracavernous injection responders 29.9% were refractory to sildenafil, while 33. 3% of previous intracavernous injection nonresponders responded to sildenafil. The sildenafil response was considered inferior to the intracavernous injection response by 43.6% of the men who previously responded to intracavernous injection, of whom 51.5% continued to receive intracavernous injection as the only treatment (19.5%) or as an alternative to sildenafil (32%). Adverse effects in 53.6% of cases were assessed as mild in 56.4%, moderate in 38.3% and severe in 5.3%. Multiple adverse effects were reported by 62.4% of patients, while 17 (6.1%) discontinued sildenafil as a direct result of intolerable adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were facial flushing in 33.5% of cases, headaches in 23.4%, nasal congestion in 12.6%, dyspepsia in 10.1% and dizziness in 10.8%. Baseline patient and partner quality of life scores significantly improved after sildenafil treatment (p <0.001), while significantly improved quality of life was noticed by 51.5% and 43.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil citrate is effective oral first line treatment for erectile dysfunction. Although more than 50% of men reported adverse effects, most were considered mild and rarely resulted in treatment cessation. There was a trend in those on intracavernous injection who responded to sildenafil to continue intracavernous injection as the only therapy or as an alternative to sildenafil. Also, we noted that some cases refractory to sildenafil responded to intracavernous injection. These findings imply that intracavernous injection remains an effective erectile dysfunction treatment option.     

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in prostate brachytherapy patients with erectile dysfunction

Objectives. To ascertain the efficacy of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) either before or after prostate brachytherapy by an open-label, nonrandomized study.Methods. Sixty-two patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy between March 1995 and July 1998, had ED either before or after brachytherapy, and were interested in treatment with sildenafil comprised the patient population. Clinical and treatment parameters evaluated for medication efficacy included patient age at brachytherapy and at medication administration, hypertension, diabetes, smoking history, onset of ED, potency status before implant, frequency of intercourse before brachytherapy (if potent), use of neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation, use of moderate dose external beam radiation therapy before implantation, choice of isotope, V100 (the percentage of the prostate volume receiving at least 100% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose), and sildenafil dose.Results. Fifty (80.6%) of 62 patients responded favorably to sildenafil. None of the treatment parameters predicted medication failure, and among the clinical parameters, only diabetes predicted failure (3 of 5) and only with borderline statistical validity (P = 0.046).Conclusions. Our results suggest brachytherapy-induced impotence is as amenable to sildenafil treatment as ED from other causes. In addition, our 80.6% success rate is comparable to reported results for patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and significantly better than patients who underwent unilateral nerve-sparing or non-nerve-sparing approaches.     

The female partner''s satisfaction with sildenafil citrate treatment of erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Data on female partners' satisfaction are scarce, although there have been many articles on patient satisfaction after sildenafil citrate treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of female partners of patients receiving sildenafil citrate for their erectile dysfunction (ED) and to assess the female partners' sexual function. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with ED were treated. Their female partners were asked to answer a questionnaire we have prepared to evaluate the efficacy of treatment, sexual satisfaction and changes in quality of life. It also included a question about female sexual function. From the results, the relationship between their female partner's satisfaction and efficacy of treatment, as well as female sexual function, were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty (31%) questionnaires were returned to us for analysis. Effectiveness of the treatment was acknowledged by 90% of the partners. An improvement in their partner's quality of life was noticed by 60% of the women. The majority (66.7%) of the female partners were satisfied with sildenafil citrate treatment and 20% were disappointed. Moreover, 20% of the female partners were concerned about adverse events. Regarding female sexual function, some form of sexual dysfunction affected 46.7% of the women. Furthermore, a significant number (P = 0.0230) of the female partners disappointed with the treatment had some kind of sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that female partners reported relatively high levels of treatment satisfaction. Female partners' sexual function and anxiety regarding adverse events should be evaluated when their satisfaction with sildenafil citrate treatment is poor despite an improvement of erectile function.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men in Egypt and South Africa

The efficacy of sildenafil citrate (Viagra), an oral agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), has been demonstrated in global studies. This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, flexible-dose study assessed the efficacy and safety of sildenafil to treat ED in men in Egypt and South Africa. Men with ED of varied etiology were randomized to receive sildenafil 50 mg (n=128) or placebo (n=126); doses could be adjusted to 100 or 25 mg. Questions from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) assessing the ability to achieve (Q3) and maintain (Q4) erections demonstrated a significant improvement with sildenafil compared with placebo (P<0.0001). Improved erections were reported by 74% of patients receiving sildenafil and 27% of those receiving placebo (P<0.0001). Headache, dyspepsia, and flushing were the most common adverse events in sildenafil-treated patients. These results are consistent with clinical trials in other countries. We conclude that sildenafil is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for men with ED in Egypt and South Africa.     

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction: effect of type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction: effect of type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 466 male patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled in this study. Of them 382 were diabetic and 84 were non-diabetic. Patients were screened for ED using the erectile function domain of the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF). Patients underwent routine laboratory investigations, in addition to total testosterone and prolactin assessment. To assess the effect of diabetes on efficacy of sildenafil, we compared the pre and post sildenafil responses to erectile function domain, Q3, Q4. Overall satisfaction and global efficacy question (GEQ) were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean age +/- S.D. was 53 +/- 8.4 and 49.7 +/- 10.6 years for patients with and without diabetes respectively. There were significant associations between increased severity of ED and longer duration, poor metabolic control and presence of more than one diabetes-related complication (p < 0.05 for each). Differences were significant between pre and post sildenafil administration regarding erectile function domain, Q3, Q4 (p < 0.05 for each). In the non-diabetic patients the GEQ and the overall satisfaction were significantly higher than in diabetics (p < 0.05 for each). Global efficacy question was significantly low in patients with fair and poor metabolic control, longer duration of diabetes, and patients with diabetic complications (p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is an effective treatment for diabetic patients with ED. Although the efficacy of sildenafil was negatively affected by factors as poor control and longer duration of diabetes and presence of more than one diabetes-related complication, however, the global efficacy and the overall patients' satisfaction were high.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil for treating erectile dysfunction in patients on dialysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients on haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), as men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often have sexual dysfunction (up to 82% among those on chronic dialysis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ED and in ESRD participated in an open-label prospective study. Thirty patients on HD and 11 on PD were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Fugl-Meyer life-satisfaction scale before and after sildenafil treatment. A total score in the erectile function domain of < or = 25 was accepted as indicating ED. All patients were started on a 25-mg dose, which was increased to 50 mg if there was no response after two trials. In addition, the overall efficacy question was used to evaluate satisfaction, and patients reported any side-effects during treatment. RESULTS: The erectile function and intercourse satisfaction domains improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). After sildenafil treatment, two-thirds of those on HD (20/30) and nine of the 11 on PD recovered their erectile function. The pretreatment scores on the IIEF and four domains (except sexual desire) of those responding were significantly higher than in those not responding (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate on the overall efficacy question was 80% and 82% for the HD and PD groups, respectively. At least one side-effect was seen in 17 patients (43%); one had severe hypotension in the PD group. Overall, mild headache (seven patients, 18%) and flushing (12, 30%) were reported most often. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and satisfactory drug for improving erectile function in patients with ESRD. Patients were satisfied whether treated by HD or PD. Pretreatment scores on the IIEF may be useful for predicting the success of treatment.     

万艾可在伴心血管疾病ED患者中的临床应用

目的评价万艾可对伴有心血管疾病患者勃起功能障碍(ED)治疗的有效性和安全性。方法伴有心血管疾病的ED患者85例,其中高血压34例,冠心病19例,心律失常32例。性交前1h口服万艾可25mg,以后根据患者对治疗的满意程度和对药物的耐受性,逐渐增加,最大可达100mg。最大剂量不超过100mg/d。疗程为8周。结果万艾可治疗后,本组IIEF-5评分平均为(18．37±4．05)分,IIEF-5评分增加(8．61±2．35)分,配偶满意度总体评价,满意率达72．9%。结论慢性、稳定的心血管疾病ED患者对应用万艾可治疗有良好的有效性和耐受性。     

Efficacy and safety of flexible-dose oral sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Brazilian and Mexican men

A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of flexible-dose sildenafil citrate (Viagra) treatment (25, 50 or 100 mg) in Brazilian and Mexican men with erectile dysfunction (ED) of broad-spectrum etiology. Efficacy was assessed on the basis of responses to the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, completed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. At end point, mean scores for all IIEF domains of sexual function (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction) were significantly (P<0.0001) higher in the sildenafil group (n=109) than in the placebo group (n=105). These findings confirm the significant increases in frequency of penetration and frequency of maintained erections reported previously. Sildenafil treatment was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were headache and flushing. In conclusion, sildenafil is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for ED of broad-spectrum etiology in Latin American men.     

西地那非规律服用治疗勃起功能障碍疗效及安全性评估

目的:探讨西地那非规律服用治疗阴茎勃起功能障碍(ED)的疗效及安全性。方法:334例ED患者随机分为3组,分别给予西地那非50 mg每日1次口服(西地那非规律治疗组,n=111)、西地那非100 mg性生活前30 min口服(西地那非按需治疗组,n=102)、他达拉非10 mg每日1次口服(他达拉非规律治疗组,n=121)。3个月后评估国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)评分、阴茎勃起硬度评分(EHS)以及不良反应等。结果:334例ED患者中316例获得随访,3组患者年龄、BMI、受教育情况、病程、失访率、基线IIEF-5评分及EHS评分无统计学差异(P0.05)。3组患者治疗后IIEF-5评分及EHS评分均较治疗前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后西地那非规律治疗组、西地那非按需治疗组及他达拉非规律治疗组IIEF-5评分[(15.15±2.05)分vs(15.55±2.36)分vs(15.54±2.27)分]无统计学差异(P0.05),但西地那非规律治疗组EHS评分[(3.12±1.52)分]低于西地那非按需治疗组[(3.48±1.80)分](P0.05)。西地那非规律治疗组、西地那非按需治疗组及他达拉非规律治疗组治疗有效率分别为76.2%、62.4%和80.8%,西地那非按需治疗组明显低于其他两组(P0.05)。3组不良反应均较轻微,且3组之间不良反应发生率无明显统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:西地那非规律治疗与他达拉非规律治疗疗效相当,优于西地那非按需治疗,且不良反应无明显增加,是一种值得推荐的ED治疗方法。     

Algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction in the era of sildenafil citrate

Since Viagra (sildenafil citrate) was released as a pharmaceutical agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, it has had a big impact on the work undertaken in our practice. I herewith present an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction in the era of sildenafil citrate.     

Risk factors in predicting a poor response to sildenafil citrate in elderly men with erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy of sildenafil and the potential predictors of poor response to sildenafil in elderly patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 162 patients (aged > or = 60 years) treated with sildenafil for at least 8 weeks; all patients were evaluated with a history, physical examination, measurement of total testosterone and a pharmacological erection test. Sexual function before and 8 weeks after treatment was assessed using the self-administered International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Treatment was considered successful when the patient attained a higher grade on the erectile function (EF) domain score, and an affirmative response to the overall assessment question. Factors influencing treatment outcome were evaluated by univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: The overall efficacy with sildenafil was 47% (76/162). On univariate analysis, uncontrolled diabetes, current smoking, hypogonadism (<3 microg/L testosterone) and low pretreatment EF domain score (<17) were selected as predictors of a poor response. On multivariate logistic regression, a low pretreatment EF domain score was the strongest independent prognostic factor for a poor response (odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.45-7.33), and this was followed by hypogonadism (1.89, 1.12-3.16) and current smoking (1.34, 1.04-3.52). CONCLUSION: In a real clinical setting, sildenafil was effective for about half of the elderly men. The baseline EF domain score, hypogonadism and current smoking were significantly associated with failure of sildenafil. These results suggest that modifying reversible risk factors, e.g. stopping smoking and replacing testosterone, would be beneficial in augmenting the efficacy of sildenafil in elderly men.     

Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of therapeutic success with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with different spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, open, prospective, before-after study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil therapy for erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury, and the association between the response to sildenafil and factors such as causes and levels of spinal cord injury, grade of ASIA deficit, time since injury, orgasmic perception, and degree of baseline erection. SETTING: Homes of outpatients of 16 spinal cord injury units in Spain. METHOD: One hundred and seventy patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury, from whom baseline data were collected on their sexual function, and who started treatment with sildenafil 50 mg. An efficacy assessment was made by the patient and his partner, and the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was recorded. RESULTS: It was reported by 88.2% of the patients and 85.3% of their partners that treatment with sildenafil had improved their erections, regardless of the baseline characteristics of the spinal cord injury and erectile function. In responders, this improvement was confirmed by an increase from 12.5 to 24.8 points (P<0.001) of the Erectile Function Domain of IIEF. A significant improvement was also seen in patients' satisfaction with sexual activity and general satisfaction derived from sexual life. Preservation of orgasmic perception and a baseline degree of erection of 3 or 4 (P=0.006) were predictors of therapeutic success. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury, regardless of the cause, neurological level, ASIA grade, and time since injury. SPONSORSHIP: Spanish Society of Paraplegia.     

国产枸橼酸西地那非治疗男性勃起功能障碍的安全性和有效性研究

目的:评价国产枸橼酸西地那非(金戈)治疗男性勃起功能障碍(ED)的安全性、有效性和耐受性。方法:采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究方法,在国内5家医院泌尿外科或男科门诊纳入222例ED患者,随机分为西地那非组(111例)和安慰剂组(111例),进行为期8周的临床治疗观察。以国际勃起功能问卷(IIEF)评分、性交成功率作为有效性评价指标,以不良事件发生率作为安全性评价指标。结果:西地那非组和安慰剂组患者年龄分别为(47.20±11.32)岁和(46.67±13.08)岁(P0.05),ED病因分别为心理性(27.93% vs 23.42%)、器质性(21.62% vs 29.73%)和混合性ED(50.45% vs 46.85%)(P均0.05),其他流行病学数据如身高、体重、民族、吸烟、饮酒、药物过敏史等一般情况也均无统计学差异。对主要疗效指标的分析结果显示,西地那非组与安慰剂组对勃起功能显著有效率分别为78.90%和29.91%(P0.01);西地那非组性交成功率和总体疗效分别为63.87%和77.98%,均明显高于安慰剂组的29.16%和34.58%(P均0.01)。在对于不同种类ED的治疗上,西地那非对心理性、器质性和混合性ED的有效率分别为64.52%、83.33%和82.14%,明显高于安慰剂组的46.15%、21.21%和25.00%(P均0.01)。安全性评价结果显示,共有45例(20.27%)受试者出现了各种不良事件(西地那非组有32例,安慰剂组有13例),所出现的不良事件大多数为轻度、一过性的。结论:国产枸橼酸西地那非是一种可治疗各种病因导致ED的安全有效的药物,且患者耐受性较好。     

Treatment with sildenafil citrate in renal transplant patients with erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate in renal transplant patients with erectile dysfunction, as up to half of men with renal failure may be affected and only 60-75% recover potency after transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with erectile dysfunction and a functioning renal transplant were treated using sildenafil (mean age 54 years, mean time on dialysis 35 months, mean time from transplantation 20 months). The hypogastric artery was not used during transplantation in any patient. Sildenafil citrate was prescribed at doses of 25 or 50 mg depending on baseline creatinine values and on the response, and plasma levels of cyclosporin/FK506 were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty patients (60%) had a satisfactory response, with a mean time on dialysis of 23 months. Six patients (12%) did not take the sildenafil and in 14 (28%) the drug was ineffective. The mean time on dialysis in this group was 43 months. Six patients (12%) had side-effects that in no case led to withdrawal of treatment. Plasma levels of cyclosporin/FK506 remained within the safety and efficacy limits in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with sildenafil citrate in renal transplant patients with erectile dysfunction is an effective and safe option, with few side-effects. Plasma levels of immunosuppressants are unchanged. The response was more effective in patients with a shorter time on dialysis, as penile vascular disease is less advanced.     

Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction of various etiologies

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) of various etiologies. METHODS: In a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study, 514 men (mean age 56 years) with ED were randomized to receive 25, 50, or 100 mg of sildenafil or placebo. The primary etiology of ED was determined to be organic in 32% of men, psychogenic in 25%, or mixed in 43%. Sildenafil or placebo was taken in the home setting approximately 1 hour before sexual activity, not more than once daily. Efficacy was determined by responses to question 3 (ability to achieve an erection) and question 4 (ability to maintain an erection) of the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Other measures of efficacy included the five sexual function domains of the IIEF, a global efficacy question, event log data, and a partner questionnaire. RESULTS: Sildenafil significantly increased patients' ability to achieve and maintain erections (P <0.0001), with efficacy increasing with increasing dose. Significant improvements were also observed in the IIEF domains for erectile function, orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall sexual satisfaction (P <0.0001). The proportion of subjects who felt that treatment with sildenafil improved their erections was significantly greater (67% to 86%) than that with placebo treatment (24%, P <0.0001). The proportion of successful attempts at sexual intercourse also increased significantly with sildenafil treatment (P <0.001). Partner responses corroborated patient reports. Sildenafil was well tolerated at the three doses studied. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for ED of various etiologies.