Differences between allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in a large sample of adolescents and adults

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe differences between allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) in a large community-based sample of Danish adolescents and adults. METHODS: A total of 1,186 subjects, 14-44 years of age, who in a screening questionnaire had reported a history of airway symptoms suggestive of asthma and/or allergy, or who were taking any medication for these conditions were clinically examined. All participants were interviewed about respiratory symptoms and furthermore skin test reactivity, lung function and airway responsiveness were measured using standard techniques. RESULTS: A total of 77% of the subjects with rhinitis had AR, whereas 23% had NAR. Subjects with NAR were more likely to be females, OR = 2.05 (1.31-3.20), P = 0.002, to have persistent symptoms within the last 4 weeks, OR = 1.88 (1.23-2.89), P = 0.003, and to have recurring headaches, OR = 1.94, (1.12-3.37), P = 0.019. On the other hand, subjects with NAR were less likely to have airway hyperresponsiveness, OR = 0.40, (0.24-0.66), P < 0.001, food allergy, OR = 0.40, (0.19-0.36), P = 0.009 and to have been treated with antihistamines in the last 4 weeks, OR = 0.22, (0.13-0.38), P < 0.001 compared with subjects with AR. Subjects with AR were symptomatically worse within their season in terms of sneezing (P < 0.001) and itchy eyes (P < 0.001), compared to subjects with NAR, whereas nasal congestion and rhinorrhea were equally frequent in the two groups (P = 0.901 and P = 0.278, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of subjects with NAR in an adolescent and adult population with rhinitis is around one-fourth. Women have NAR twice as often as men. In general, subjects with NAR have more persistent but equally severe symptoms compared to subjects with AR. However, subjects with AR have more sneezing and itchy eyes within their particular season of allergy compared to subjects with NAR.     

Sense of smell in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis

Hyposmia is a fairly common complaint in patients with long-continuing aliergic or nonallergic rhinitis. Other factors such as aging, smoking, or nasal surgery may affect olfaction, but these have been little studied in rhinitisrelated hyposmia. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare olfactory thresholds in 105 rhinitis patients and 104 healthy controls and to analyze possible relationships between the sense of smell and rhinitis, age, sex, smoking, prick-test results, nasal resistance, and history of nasal or paranasal surgery. The olfactory threshold was assessed with a commercially available kit of squeeze-bottle pairs. The most important variables associated with the sense of smell were determined with stepwise multiple regression analysis, and intergroup differences were assessed with analysis of variance. The reference interval of olfactory thresholds by age was estimated with regression analysis. Nasal resistance was measured by active anterior rhinomanometry. Age and rhinitis were the only variables with significant effect on the olfactory threshold in the whole series. Both the proportion of hyposmic persons and the degree of the impairment of the sense of smell were significantly higher in the rhinitis group than in the control group. The nonallergic patients' sense of smell was poorer than that of seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis patients. A history of operations for nasal polyposis was associated with hyposmia, but operations for chronic maxillary sinusitis were not. Neither smoking habits nor sex were related to olfactory thresholds. In conclusion, hyposmia in rhinitis patients is partly attributable to age-related changes, but our results indicate that the disease itself impairs the sense of smell.     

Objective assessments of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in young children

Background:  Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis are common childhood disorders.
Objective:  To study nasal eosinophilia and nasal airway patency in young children with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis to assess the pathology behind such diagnoses.
Methods:  We investigated 255 children at six years of age from the Copenhagen Prospective Study on Asthma in Childhood birth cohort assessing rhinitis history, specific immunoglobulin E relevant to rhinitis symptoms, nasal eosinophilia and nasal airway patency by acoustic rhinometry before and after decongestion. Associations were studied in a multivariate graphical model corrected for gender, height and nasal steroid usage.
Results:  Allergic rhinitis was significantly and directly associated with irreversible nasal airway obstruction (reduced decongested nasal airway patency) ( P  =   0.004), whereas nonallergic rhinitis was not. Both allergic rhinitis ( P  =   0.000) and nonallergic rhinitis ( P  =   0.014) were directly and significantly associated with nasal eosinophilia, but this association was stronger for allergic rhinitis.
Conclusion:  Allergic rhinitis and nonallergic rhinitis are of different pathologies as suggested from their different associations not only to allergy but importantly also to irreversible nasal airway obstruction and eosinophilic inflammation. Allergic rhinitis was significantly associated with nasal eosinophilia and irreversible nasal airway obstruction suggesting chronic inflammation and structural remodeling of the nasal mucosa in children at the age of 6 years. Nonallergic rhinitis exhibited no change in the nasal airway patency, but some nasal mucosal eosinophilia albeit less than children with allergic rhinitis.     

Relationships between allergic inflammation and nasal airflow in children with persistent allergic rhinitis due to mite sensitization

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is associated with Th2-dependent inflammation. Nasal obstruction is the most typical symptom in children with mite allergy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible relationships among nasal symptoms, allergic inflammation, including inflammatory cells and cytokine pattern, and nasal airflow in children with persistent allergic rhinitis because of mite sensitization. METHODS: Twenty children (13 males and seven females, mean age 13.4 +/- 1.6 years) with persistent rhinitis because of mite allergy were evaluated. All of them had moderate-severe grade of nasal obstruction. Total symptom score (TSS), rhinomanometry, nasal lavage, and nasal scraping were obtained in all subjects. Inflammatory cells were counted by conventional staining; interleukin (IL)-5, and IL-8 were measured by immunoassay on fluids recovered from nasal lavage. RESULTS: Eosinophils were significantly associated with TSS (R = 74.4%, P = 0.0002), with IL-5 (R = 90.6%, P < 0.0001) and with nasal flow (R = -69%, P = 0.0007), but not with IL-8 (R = 0.1%, P = 0.995). Eosinophil levels were shown to independently predict nasal flow (P < 0.001), with flow decreasing linearly for increasing eosinophils, together with a significant effect of neutrophils (P = 0.016, linear increase in flow) and a borderline effect of IL-8 (P = 0.063, linear increase in flow). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the close association between IL-5 concentration and eosinophil infiltration. In addition, there is clear evidence concerning the relationship between eosinophil infiltration and nasal airflow. Thus, nasal eosinophils can be regarded as the most important predictor of upper airway function. These findings constitute first evidence of the relationship between nasal airflow impairment and Th2-related eosinophilic inflammation in children with persistent allergic rhinitis because of mite sensitization.     

Association between nasal and bronchial symptoms in subjects with persistent allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: The association between nasal and bronchial symptoms, and the course of bronchial responsiveness and airway inflammation in house dust mite sensitive persistent rhinitis over a prolonged time period has not been thoroughly explored. OBJECTIVE: To determine if nasal symptoms were associated with bronchial symptoms in persistent rhinitic subjects, and to assess their bronchial responsiveness and airway inflammation in comparison to nonrhinitic, nonatopic controls. The additional impact of pollen sensitivity on the lower airways in rhinitic subjects was also addressed. METHODS: Rhinitics and controls answered telephone symptom questionnaires once every 2 weeks for 1 year. Every 3 months, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) and bronchial responsiveness to histamine were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-seven rhinitics and 19 controls completed the study. High nasal symptom scores in rhinitic subjects were associated with bronchial symptoms (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5). Bronchial hyper-responsiveness was present in 32.4% of rhinitic subjects on at least one clinical visit during the year. Pollen allergy caused seasonal variation in eNO (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In persistent rhinitic subjects, high nasal symptom scores were associated with bronchial symptoms, and many subjects experienced bronchial hyper-responsiveness during the year. Persistent rhinitic subjects were more at risk than healthy adults of bronchial symptoms and airway inflammation, which are likely risk factors for asthma.     

Prevalence, classification and perception of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in Belgium

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and noninfectious, nonallergic rhinitis (NINA) are common disorders, which may prompt patients to seek medical help. METHODS: We performed a survey in a representative sample of the Belgian population (n=4959) with an overall prevalence of self-declared recent rhinitis symptoms of 39.3%. Detailed information on patients having experienced nasal symptoms over the past year was then obtained from a random sample of respondents (n=743). RESULTS: The adjusted prevalence was 29.8% for AR and 9.6% for NINA, respectively. According to the ARIA classification, there was significantly more 'persistent' symptomatology in the AR group (40.8%) than in NINA (23.5%) (P<0.001), and more 'moderate/severe' symptom intensity in AR (75.4%) than in NINA (53.1%) (P<0.001). Allergic rhinitis patients suffered from a greater number of symptoms than NINA patients (P<0.001). Asthma, skin and food allergy as co-morbidities were all found to be significantly more prevalent in the AR vs the NINA group (P<0.05 for all). The percentage of consulting patients (total: 66.8%), who subjectively perceived their rhinitis as moderate/severe, was 94.0%, whereas 75.6% of these patients were classified accordingly based on ARIA criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of self-declared rhinitis symptoms in the Belgian population, AR being about three times more prevalent than NINA. In addition, AR patients suffered from a greater number of symptoms and displayed a more 'persistent' and 'moderate-severe' ARIA profile than NINA. About 75% of patients seeking medical help suffer from 'moderate to severe' forms of rhinitis.     

Comparison of olfactory function in patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis

Hyposmia is a common symptom in allergic rhinitis. However, little is known about differences in the olfactory function of patients with seasonal or perennial allergy. A prospective controlled study was performed on 28 patients with allergic rhinitis to grass pollen and on 47 patients with allergic rhinitis to mites. Sixty-six healthy volunteers served as a control. Olfactory function was evaluated by a modified Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center testing procedure for threshold, identification, and discrimination. The grass pollen-allergic patients were tested prcseasonally and after 3 weeks of intraseasonal grass pollen exposure: the mite-allergic patients and the volunteers were tested once. In the mite allergies, olfactory threshold, identification, and discrimination tests were significantly worse than in the volunteers (all P<0.0001). In the grass pollen allergies, the results in olfactory identification and discrimination tests were not different from the controls if tested out of the season (both F>0.05). However, in threshold testing (P=0.0139), the results were worse. Intraseasonally, the grass pollen allergies showed a significant decrease in threshold, identification (both P<0.001), and discrimination testing (P=0.0()29). If the intraseasonal pollen allergies were compared to the mite allergies, they showed better results in identification (F=0.(X)87) and threshold (F<0.001) tests, but worse results m discrimination testing (P=0.(XM)2). Therefore, the different kind of allergen exposure seems to result in a different pattern of allergic olfactory dysfunction.     

Minimal persistent inflammation in allergic rhinitis: implications for current treatment strategies

Patients with allergic rhinitis have traditionally been placed into ‘seasonal’ and ‘perennial’ categories, which do not account for the subclinical inflammatory state that exists in many patients. In subjects with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, even subthreshold doses of allergen have been found to cause inflammatory cell infiltration in the nasal mucosa, including increases in expression of cellular adhesion molecules, nasal and conjunctival eosinophilia, and other markers of inflammation, which do not result in overt allergy symptoms. This state – which has been termed ‘minimal persistent inflammation’– may contribute to hyperreactivity and increased susceptibility to development of clinical symptoms as well as common co‐morbidities of allergic rhinitis, such as asthma. Treating overt allergy symptoms as well as this underlying inflammatory state requires agents that have well‐established clinical efficacy, convenient administration, potent anti‐inflammatory effects and proven long‐term safety, so that long‐term continuous administration is feasible. Of the three major classes of commonly used allergic rhinitis medications – intranasal corticosteroids, anti‐histamines, and anti‐leukotrienes – intranasal corticosteroids appear to represent the most reasonable therapeutic option in patients who would benefit from continuous inhibition of persistent inflammation.     

Desloratadine relieves nasal congestion and improves quality-of-life in persistent allergic rhinitis

Background:  Symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), particularly nasal congestion, can impair quality-of-life (QoL). However, only a modest correlation exists between these symptoms and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) scores, suggesting that both be evaluated for a complete assessment of health.
Methods:  Subjects with a ≥2-year history of moderate-to-severe AR to dust mite or cat dander were randomized to desloratadine 5 mg/day ( n  =   293) or placebo/day ( n  =   291) for 28 days. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in a.m./p.m. nasal congestion score. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in total nasal symptom score, individual symptom scores and RQLQ scores (completed on days 1, 7, and 28).
Results:  The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma criteria for persistent allergic rhinitis (PER) were fulfilled by 99% of subjects in the placebo arm. Between-treatment difference in a.m./p.m. nasal congestion score, observed from day 8 onward, significantly favored desloratadine ( P  =   0.0003). Desloratadine significantly improved a.m./p.m. nasal congestion and RQLQ scores after 1 week and at treatment end ( P  <   0.05). Improvements in 5 of 7 RQLQ domain scores exceeded the minimal important difference. On days 7 and 28, desloratadine was also significantly superior to placebo in mean change from baseline in a.m./p.m. total nasal symptom score and rhinorrhea score (both P  ≤   0.01). Symptomatic benefit was primarily driven by improvement in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea.
Conclusions:  Desloratadine 5 mg/day significantly improved symptoms associated with PER, including nasal congestion, and provided significant improvement in QoL after 1 week of treatment.     

Symptoms of persistent allergic rhinitis during a full calendar year in house dust mite-sensitive subjects

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the natural course of persistent rhinitis symptoms over a prolonged period. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and severity of nasal symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in house dust mite-sensitive persistent rhinitic subjects and to determine if medication use was related to symptoms. METHODS: Rhinitics and controls were telephoned fortnightly for 1 year to monitor symptoms. QoL was measured every 3 months. RESULTS: Thirty-seven rhinitics and 19 controls completed the study. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSS) were 'high' for 65% (95% CI +/- 6%) of the year in rhinitic subjects. When TNSS increased by 1, the likelihood of nasal medication use increased by 25% (95% CI: 7-46%). General and specific QoL were worse in rhinitic subjects than controls (P < 0.04 and <0.0001). Rhinitics with pollen allergy (n = 21) had seasonal variation in the frequency of high nasal symptom scores (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Nasal symptom scores were consistently high in rhinitics, and their QoL was worse than controls, even in general QoL. An increase in nasal symptom score increased the likelihood of nasal medication use. These findings help to characterize the course of persistent rhinitis over a previously unstudied period of 1 year.     

Clinical comparison of systemic methylprednisolone acetate versus topical budesonide in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

Thirty patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis entered a double blind study comparing budesonide (nasal spray, 400 micrograms/d) and i.m. injection of 80 mg methylprednisolone acetate. Symptoms were assessed over a "run in" period of 3-7 days followed by a treatment period of 3 weeks. Pollen counts were evaluated daily. Both the systemic and topical corticosteroid treatment resulted in a significant improvement of nasal and ocular symptoms and were accompanied by reduced antihistamine intake. A comparison of the two treatments in relation to the pollen count yielded statistically significantly fewer nasal symptoms, such as itching, secretion, and sneezing in the budesonide-treated group. Nasal blockage and ocular symptoms remained unchanged, but the use of eyedrops was significantly reduced in the methylprednisolone-treated group. Side effects of both treatments were mild and the incidence negligible. Methylprednisolone-treated patients had a significantly lower cortisol value after 7 days but still had a normal response to ACTH-stimulation. We conclude that the acute symptoms of allergic rhinitis are at least as well ameliorated by regular topical application of budesonide as by a single injection of methylprednisolone acetate. The accompanying allergic conjunctivitis may require additional treatment.     

Important research questions in allergy and related diseases: nonallergic rhinitis: a GA2LEN paper

 Nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) can be defined as a chronic nasal inflammation which is not caused by systemic IgE-dependent mechanisms. It is common and probably affects far more than 200 million people worldwide. Both children and adults are affected. However, its exact prevalence is unknown and its phenotypes need to be evaluated using appropriate methods to better understand its pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. It is important to differentiate between infectious rhinitis, allergic/NAR and chronic rhinosinusitis, as management differs for each of these cases. Characterization of the phenotype, mechanisms and management of NAR represents one of the major unmet needs in allergic and nonallergic diseases. Studies on children and adults are required in order to appreciate the prevalence, phenotype, severity and co-morbidities of NAR. These studies should compare allergic and NAR and consider different age group populations including elderly subjects. Mechanistic studies should be carried out to better understand the disease(s) and risk factors and to guide towards an improved diagnosis and therapy. These studies need to take the heterogeneity of NAR into account. It is likely that neuronal mechanisms, T cells, innate immunity and possibly auto-immune responses all play a role in NAR and may also contribute to the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.     

Prevalence and severity of allergic rhinitis in house dust mite-allergic patients with bronchial asthma or atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis are closely associated. Although population-based studies report a high prevalence of rhinitis among asthma patients, less is known of the association between rhinitis and atopic dermatitis and the severity of concomitant rhinitis. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the prevalence and severity of allergic rhinitis among asthmatics and patients with atopic dermatitis and assessed whether age and comorbidity influence the severity of rhinitis signs and symptoms. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-five patients recruited for a multicentre trial to study the effect of encasings of mattresses, pillows and duvets on signs and symptoms of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma and/or atopic dermatitis recorded visual analogue scores (VAS) and daily symptom scores and underwent nasal challenge tests with house dust mite (HDM). RESULTS: Based on history and clinical symptoms 92% of the 164 asthmatic patients and 85% of the 86 patients with atopic dermatitis could be diagnosed as having rhinitis. Inclusion of a positive provocation to HDM did not result in a substantial lower prevalence of rhinitis. Subjects reported moderate symptoms, with mean rhinitis VAS scores ranging from 40.0 to 55.0. Presence of atopic dermatitis was associated with lower rhinitis VAS and symptoms scores, whereas in multivariate analysis the presence of asthma was positively associated with nasal responsiveness to HDM. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of nasal symptoms in patients with bronchial asthma or atopic dermatitis and sensitized to house dust mites is high. Although the majority of patients experience mild to moderate symptoms, the presence of nasal disease needs to be examined in all patients with atopic disorders.