Undesirable Mode Switching with a Dual Chamher Rate Responsive Pacemaker

The Telectronics 1250 Meta MV DDDR pacemaker is a new device featuring automatic mode switching from DDDH to VVIR pacing in the event of an atrial arrhythmia. Although mode switching is a valuable feature, sinus tachycardia can cause an undesirable mode switch to occur. Of 24 implants at this institution, 11 have been for an AV conduction disorder. Eight of these 11 patients were specificalJy evaiuated for undesirable mode switching. During exercise testing and/or Holter monitoring, mode switching was repeatediy seen in seven of the eight at low levels of exercise. Factors precipitating mode switching were a low rate response factor, low upper rate setting, long base postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) and a long AV delay. During Holter monitoring, patients spent up to 50% of the time in VVIR pacing as opposed to DDDR pacing. It is concluded that patients with intact sinus node function are at risk of undesirable mode switching and should probably be programmed to the DDD mode unless there is a specific indication for DDDR pacing. If the DDDR mode is chosen, careful selection of the aforementioned pacing parameters is required.     

Pacemaker Syndrome Induced by the Mode Switching Algorithm of a DDDR Pacemaker

A patient with marked first-degree AV block and a DDDR pacemaker presented with a history of paroxysmal narrow QRS tachycardia, subsequently identified as sinus tachycardia (with a very long PR interval), causing a clinical problem similar to pacemaker syndrome because of loss of AV synchrony. The latter resulted from an excessively long postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) that prevented sensing of sinus P waves. The unfavorable hemodynamics caused reflex sinus tachycardia. The long PVARP was mandated by the mode switching algorithm of this particular device and was automatically set according to the selected tachycardia detection rate. The patient became asymptomatic when the mode switching function was turned off and the PVARP shortened.     

Atrial Arrhythmia Management with Sensor Controlled Atrial Refractory Period and Automatic Mode Switching in Patients with Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacemakers

Although a long postventricular atrial refractory period fPVARP) may prevent the occurrence of pacemaker mediated tachycardias and inadvertent tracking of atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber (DDD) pacing, the maximum upper rate will necessarily be compromised. We tested the feasibility of using minute ventilation sensing in a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker (DDDR) to shorten the PVARP during exercise in 13 patients with bradycardias (resting PVARP = 463 ± 29 msec) to avoid premature upper rate behavior. Graded treadmill exercise tests in the DDD and DDDR modes at this PVARP resulted in maximum ventricular rates of 98 ± 8 and 142 ± 3 beats/min, respectively (P < 0.0001), due to chronotropic incompetence and upper rate limitation in the DDD mode, both circumvened with the use of sensor. In order to simulate atrial arrhythmias, chest wall stimulation was applied for 30 seconds at a rate of 250 beats/min at a mean unipolar atrial sensitivity of 0.82 mV. Irregular ventricular responses occurred in the DDD mode fthe rates at a PVARP of 280 and 463 ± 29 msec were, respectively 92 ± 5 and 66 ± 3 msec; P < 0.0001). In the DDDR mode at a PVARP of 463 ± 29 msec, regular ventricular pacing at 53 ± 2 beats/min occurred due to mode switching to VVIR mode in the presence of repetitive sensed atrial events within the PVARP. One patient developed spontaneous atrial fibrillation on follow-up, which was correctly identified by the pacemaker algorithm, resulting in mode switch from DDDR to regular VVIR pacing and preservation of rate response. In conclusion, sensor controlled PVARP allows a long PVARP to be used at rest without limiting the maximum rate during exercise. In addition, to offer protection against retrograde conduction, a long PVARP and mode switching also limit the rate during atrial arrhythmias and allow regular ventricular rate responses according to the physiological demands.     

The "Automatic Mode Switch" Function in Successive Generations of Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Responsive Pacemakers

Automatic mode switch (AMS) from DDDR to VVIR pacing is a new algorithm, in response to paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. With the 5603 Programmer, the AMS in the Meta DDDR 1250 and 1250H (Telectronics Pacings Systems, Inc.) operates when VA is shorter than the adaptable PVARP. With the 9600 Programmer, an atrial protection interval can be defined after the PVARP. The latest generation, Meta DDDR 1254, initiates AMS when 5 or 11 heart cycles are > 150, 175, or 200 beats/min. From 1990 to 1993, 61 patients, mean age 61 years, received a Meta DDDR: in 24 a 1250, in 12 a 1250H and in the remaining 25 a 1254 model. Indication for pacing was heart block in 39, sick sinus syndrome in 15, the combination in 6, and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in 1. Paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias were present in 43. All patients had routine pacemaker surveillance, including 52 Holter recordings. In 32 patients, periods of atrial tachyarrhythmias were observed, with proper AMS to VVIR, except during short periods of 2:1 block for atrial flutter in 4. In two others, undersensing of the atrial arrhythmia disturbed correct AMS. With the 1250 and 1250H model, AMS was observed on several occasions during sinus rate accelerations in ten patients. This was never seen with the 1254 devices. Final programmation was VVIR in 2 (chronic atrial fibrillation), AAI in 1 (fracture of the ventricular lead), VDDR in 1 (atrial pacing during atrial fibrillation), DDD in 5, and DDDR in 53, 48 of whom had AMS programmed on. The AMS detection algorithm in the successive models of the Meta DDDR appears to have become more specfic.     

Method of atrioventricular programming in atrial flutter in patients with biventricular pacemaker

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is a common cause of exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF). Typically, during atrial tachycardia, pacemakers, both dual and biventricular, are programmed to ignore atrial tracking. Virtually all current pacemakers and defibrillators use a programmable mode switch algorithm to switch between atrial tracking modes (DDD, DDDR) to nontracking modes (DDIR, DDI, VVI) during episodes of atrial tachycardia. METHODS: In this report, we describe a novel method of atrioventricular (AV) pacemaker programming in four patients with atrial flutter and CHF who remained symptomatic postbiventricular pacemaker implantation. All patients had chronic atrial flutter upon interrogation; adjustment of AV delay and postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) was performed to enable sensing of every second to fourth atrial flutter beat by the atrial lead. Mode switch was turned "OFF" in all points, and lower and upper rate limits were set to 50 and 100 bpm. Once sequential early and late diastolic filling was seen on mitral inflow pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler, further adjustment of AV delay and PVARP was performed until the highest and broadest atrial velocity occurred on mitral inflow PW Doppler. RESULTS: All patients developed improvement in aortic ejection duration and peak ejection velocity during AV optimization. Repeat ECG in these patients at 8 months, 7 days, 2 days, and 2 months postoptimization showed no change in P and QRS relationship. All patients developed improvement in CHF symptoms postbiv pacemaker optimization. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients with CHF and stable atrial flutter who have a biventricular pacemaker, atrial mechanical contribution to cardiac output can be achieved by adjusting PVARP and AV delay during echo-guided pacemaker programming.     

Failure of Automatic Mode Switching: Recognition and Management

Dual chamher pacing is desirable to optimize AV synchrony and to potentially decrease the incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythimas. Patients with alternating periods of both supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and bradycardia pose a difficult challenge when standard dual chamber pacemakers are implanted. The automatic mode switching algorithm was introduced to prevent tracking of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythimas and avoid the adverse hemodynamic and symptomatic consequences of a rapid ventricular response. In some cases, failure to mode switch may take place when the atrial signal during tachycardia is of insufficient amplitude to be sensed. Failure to mode switch way also occur when the atrial signal periodically occurs in the atrial blanking period(s). In this article, we describe failure to mode switch in seven patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after a Telectronics Meta DDDR 1254 device was implanted. Each patient had paroxysmal atrial flutter and/or atrial fibrillation and presented with either repetitive episodes of oscillation between atrial tracking and mode switching to a nonatrial tracking pacing mode or complete failure to mode switch. Six of seven patients were taking antiarrhythmic drugs that resulted in slowing of the atrial cycle length. Pacemaker reprogramming was required in each case to restore reliable mode switching during subsequent recurrences of the atrial tachyarrhythmias. We conclude that careful pacemaker programming of patients with paroxysmal atrial flutter and the Telectronics Meta DDDR 1254 is necessary when patients are taking an antiarrhythmic drug that slows atrial cycle length.     

DDIR Versus VVIR Pacing in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) in particular those with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and patients undergoing atrioventricular nodal ablation procedures for refractory paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT), are candidates for single chamber (VVIR mode) or dual chamber rate responsive (DDIR mode) systems. To evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of each pacing mode we retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with a history of frequent PAT who received a VVIR (22 patients); or a DDDR pacemaker (11 patients) programmed to the DDIR mode. The mean follow-up time was 25 and 18 months, respectively. Preimplant left atrial diameter was significantly smaller in the DDIR group. Chronic atrial fibrillation developed in 54% of the VVIR patients and 27% of the DDIR group, but this difference was not significant. Complications of patients with VVIR pacemakers included new mitral and tricuspid insufficiency, stroke, pacemaker inlolerance and aggravated congestive heart failure. Patients with DDIR pacemakers had a lower incidence of symptoms and complications. However, this group received more antiarrhythmic medication, required a closer follow-up, and their pacemakers needed frequent reprogramming. Our findings suggest that VVIR is a poor choice for patients with SND, congestive heart failure, and PAT, and that DDIR may be an acceptable alternative.     

Initial Experience with a New Algorithm for Automatic Mode Switching from DDDR to DDIR Mode

Implantation of dual chamber devices in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias who require permanent pacemakers may lead to significant complications due to an inappropriately triggered ventricular response. VVI/VVIR units cause loss of AV synchrony in the presence of sinus activity. A new DDDR device (THERA DR, model 7940), with an automatic mode switching (AMS) algorithm, was evaluated. When the mean atrial rate is > 182 beats/min, atrial tachyarrhythmia is detected, and AMS is activated. Twenty-three patients (12 males, mean age 71 ± 7 years) underwent implantation of a THERA DDDR device with the AMS algorithm. Seventeen patients had AV block and/ or sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and atrial arrhythmias, and 6 patients (2 with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) had SSS and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The follow-up period was from 1–9 months. During follow-up, Holter monitoring and treadmill tests were performed. Results : Eighty-seven episodes of AMS were recorded. Telemetered AMS recordings demonstrated episodes in which the DDDR mode switched to the DDIR mode in the presence of PAF, and reverted to DDDR when sinus rhythm returned. Paroxysmal supraventricuiar arrhythmias with a heart rate < 182 beats/min did not activate tbe mode switch. Conclusions : This early, short-term clinical experience with a DDDR device capable of AMS from DDDR to DDIR demonstrated appropriate clinical function and response to PAF. These preliminary results suggest that DDDR pacemakers with AMS to DDIR may significantly extend the current indications for dual chamber pacing.     

Aerobic Capacity in Rate Modulated Pacing

Whether heart rate or AV synchrony is the most important factor for an increase in aerobic capacity was evaluated in a comparative study between sinus bradycardia, VVIR, DDD, and DDDR stimulation. Sixteen patients (mean age 67 years) with chronotropic incompetence and impJanted DDDR pacemaker (Telectronics META 1250) were randomly studied by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. All patients were exercised to their anaerobic threshold (ATJ with the following heart rates: DDD 84 ± 3, WIR 110 ± 5, and DDDR 116 ± 6 beats/min. Mean oxygen uptake (VO₂, mL/kg per min) at AT was 7.4 ± 0.3 in DDD and WIR modes. A 12% increase was measured in DDDR mode (8.3 ± 0.4). Compared to VVIR work capacity in the DDDR mode was improved by 17% (41 vs 48 W/min). In patients with isolated sinus node disease (n = 9) the increase of VO₂ and work capacity at AT during DDDR mode was more pronounced (16% and 20%, respectively, compared to VVIR). In patients with intermittent second or third degree AV block (n = 7) the differences between the pacing modes were not significant. This might partly be due to a lesser degree of chronotropic incompetence in this subgroup. In conclusion only the conjunction of heart rate increase and preservation of AV synchrony provides a significant improvement in aerobic capacity during exercise.     

A New Automode Switch Algorithm for Supraventricular Tachycardias

Patients with complete heart block on a spontaneous, or iatrogenic basis who also have recurrent supraventricular tachycardias, particularly atrial fibrillation and flutter, are often difficult to manage. Various techniques include: independently programmable maximum tracking and maximum sensor rates, limiting the maximum atrial tracking rate to the sensor response of the pacemaker, or automatically switching from DDDR to VVIR based upon the sensed atrial rate. This article will describe a mode switch algorithm that allows for an independently programmable atrial tachycardia detection rate (ATDR). This allows mode switching to occur only in response to the patient's pathological tachyarrhythmia, and not during normal upper rate response. The ATDR is based upon a filtered atrial rate, which will prevent an isolated premature beat from initiating the algorithm. In addition, the unit can be programmed to switch to either DDI, DDIR, VVI, or VVIR. Extensive event counters in the pulse generator allows the system to record and store the number of algorithm activations, the average atrial rate which triggered each mode switch, and the duration of the mode switch. These reports are accessible at each follow-up visit.     

A Comparison of VVIR and DDDR Pacing Following Cardiac Transplantation

We compared the clinical course of patients paced in VVIR versus DDDR mode to determine the most appropriate method of pacing following cardiac transplantation. Pacemaker implantation was required in 9 of 90 orthotopic cardiac transplants (10%). Indications included sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest (8 patients) and AV node dysfunction (1 patient). VVIR pacemakers were implanted in four patients and DDDR in five patients. DDDR patients : The mean P wave was 1.7 mV and the mean atrial stimulation threshold was 0.8 V (at 0.5 msec). During follow-up of 20 months, two atrial lead complications developed (29% of leads in 33% of patients). No lead complications were directly related to endomyocardial biopsy. VVIR patients : All four patients developed VA conduction with mean VA time 180 msec (160–240 msec). Two patients developed pacemaker syndrome. Conclusions : VA conduction and pacemaker syndrome may develop in cardiac transplant recipients paced in the VVIR mode. Dual chamber pacing is technically feasible and preferable following cardiac transplantation.     

Circumvention of Maximum Tracking Limitations with a Rate Modulated Dual Chamber Pacemaker

A patient having high grade AV block with intact sinus node function is presented in whom DDDR pacing provided the benefit of preventing 2:1 pacemaker block in response to exercise-induced sinus tachycardia. In paired treadmill tests with the patient blinded as to pacing mode, she was able to exercise longer (7.5 vs 6.6 METS) when programmed in DDDR than in DDDO. This is attributable to circumvention of 2:1 pacemaker block which had resulted in abrupt onset of fatigue and SOB (shortness of breath) when the sinus rate exceeded the maximum tracking rate of 130/min. Outpatient ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring confirmed this phenomenon during relatively strenuous activity. The theoretic advantages of dual chamber rate modulated pacing compared to the DDDO and VVIR modes are discussed.     

Initial Experience with Mode Switching in a Dual Sensor, Dual Chamher Pacemaker in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Mode switching algorithms have been developed to avoid tracking of atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL) during DDD(R) pacing. Upon recognition of AF or AFL, the mode is switched to a nontracking, sensor driven mode. The Vitatron Diamond model 800 pacemaker does this on a beat-to-beat basis. Atrial events occurring within a “physiological range” (± 15 beats/min) calculated from a running average of the atrial rate are tracked. When atrial events are not tracked the escape interval is either determined by the sensor(s) or by a fallback algorithm thereby preventing large increases in V-V interval during mode switching. Loss of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony by atrial premature beats and after an episode of AF or AFL is prevented by atrial synchronization pulses (ASP), which are delivered after a safe interval (timed out from the sensed premature atrial event) has expired and before delivery of the next ventricular stimulus. We implanted 26 such devices in 18 men and 8 women with symptomatic second- or third-degree AV block and paroxysmal AF or AFL. Their ages ranged from 18–84 years (mean 60), and the follow-up ranged from 2–13 months (mean 8). During pacemaker check-up, exercise testing or 24-hour Holter monitoring one or more episodes of mode switching was documented in 8 patients. In these 8 patients a smooth transition (ventricular rate) from sinus rhythm to AF or AFL was documented on one or more occasions, without inappropriate increase in ventricular rate in the DDDR mode. None of the patients complained of palpitations. Appropriate rate response was seen in all patients during Holter monitoring and exercise. Restoration of AV synchrony with ASP was documented many times. In 2 patients the DDIR mode was programmed due to intermittent synchronization of ventricular stimuli to near incessant supraventricular tachycardia, which sometimes gave rise to asymptomatic slightly irregular ventricular paced rhythms below WO beats/min. Recognition of AF or AFL was reliable. No inappropriate increases in ventricular pacing rate were seen at the onset of or during AF or AFL. ASP is an effective method of maintaining AV synchrony and avoiding competitive atrial pacing.     

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated By Radiofrequency Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction

JENSEN, S.M., et al .: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated By Radiofrequency Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction . Radiofrequency ablation of the AV conduction tissue (His-bundle ablation) is an accepted treatment for therapy resistant atrial fibrillation/flutter. However, data on the long-term effects of the procedure are limited. We followed 50 patients for a mean of 17 months after AV junction ablation. The indication was treatment resistant atrial fibrillation or flutter. The patients underwent a standardized interview performed by two nurses. Health care was studied via the in-patient register. Subjective improvement was reported by 88% and the number of days in hospital per year was reduced from 17 to 7. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs was reduced by 75%. If the reduction in costs of drugs and days in hospital is compared with the cost of the ablation and the pacemaker implantation, breaking even is achieved after 2.6 years. We could not confirm that patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation note less improvement than those with chronic fibrillation. Conclusion: Ablation of the AV junction is a cost effective treatment with good long-term results and relatively few complications. Recommendations: Chronic atrial fibrillation: If sinus rhythm cannot be established and in cases in which heart rate regulating drugs have been ineffective, ablation of the AV junction with implantation of a VVIR pacemaker is recommended. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: If the patient despite treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs continues to have symptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation, then AV junction ablation with implantation of a permanent pacemaker is recommended. Patients who have self-limiting episodes of atrial fibrillation should be given a DDDR pacemaker with an automatic mode switch. Patients who do not have self-limiting attacks and require DC conversion, should receive a VVIR pacemaker     

Inhibition of ventricular stimulation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and prolonged AV conduction

Episodes of repetitive P wave undersensing have been described in dual chamber pacemakers due to automatic extension of the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). Pacemaker stimulation was completely inhibited despite the presence of adequate P waves. This study sought to determine whether cycles of repetitive P wave undersensing occur even in the absence of PVARP extension. Two-hundred fifty-five patients were investigated after DDD or VDD pacemaker implantation for intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block. Forty-six episodes of repetitive atrial undersensing were found during 24-hour Holter ECG in nine patients. Pacemaker syndrome-like symptoms occurred. Episodes were elicited by atrial or ventricular premature contractions when (1) native AV conduction was present but considerably prolonged, (2) intrinsic sinus rate exceeded pacemaker intervention rate, and (3) native AV interval plus PVARP exceeded sinus cycle length. Programming of a particularly short AV interval and PVARP helped to reduce the incidence of repetitive P wave undersensing. Patients with dual chamber devices and prolonged native AV conduction are prone to develop episodes of output inhibition. Standard timing cycles may be inappropriate in these patients.     

Predictors and clinical impact of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients treated with dual chamber versus ventricular pacing

The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) trial was a prospective, multicenter, single blind, randomized comparison of single chamber, rate adaptive, ventricular pacing (VVIR) with dual chamber, rate adaptive pacing (DDDR) in 407 patients aged > or =65 years(mean 76 +/- 7 years, 60% male)with standard bradycardia indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation. The incidence, predictors, and clinical consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) developing after pacemaker implantation in the PASE trial were studied prospectively. During a median follow-up of 18 months, AF developed in 73 (18%) patients. Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidences of AF in patients with sinus node dysfunction (n=176) at 18 months were 28% in the VVIR and 16% in the DDDR groups (P=0.08). After adjustment for other clinical variables using a Cox multivariate regression model, randomization to VVIR compared with DDDR pacing mode among patients with sinus node dysfunction was independently associated with a 2.6-fold increased relative risk (RR) of developing AF after pacemaker implantation (P=0.01). Other independent clinical risk factors for development of postimplant AF included a preimplant history of hypertension (P=0.02) or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias(P<0.04). Patients who developed AF had similar health related quality of life scores and cardiovascular functional status after 18 months of pacing as patients who remained free of AF. The RR of death, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization was not increased in patients who developed AF. Thus, in the elderly patients with sinus node dysfunction requiring permanent pacing, DDDR pacing mode protected against the development of AF. However, development of AF after pacemaker implantation in this population was not associated with a significant impact on quality-of-life, functional status, or other clinical endpoints during 18 months of follow-up.     

Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia: Engineering Solutions

This discussion summarizes the interaction of refractory periods and upper rate behaviors in modern dual-chamber demand (DDD) devices, the data regarding and nine events initiating VA conduction and engineering solutions proposed and/or implemented to address the problem of pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT). Among the causes of PMT are premature atrial depolarization, loss of atrial capture, a return to the demand mode after asynchronous magnet mode pacing, programming from a mode that does not guarantee AV synchrony to a mode in which atrial tracking can occur, noise, certain situations involving Wenckebach behavior, loss of sensing, and the inability of a rate-smoothing algorithm to allow a rapid change in ventricular rate. Engineering solutions to prevent the occurrence of PMT include a programmable postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP), differential AV delay, adaptive AV delay, and the ability to discriminate between P waves of atrial origin and those resulting from retrograde conduction from the ventricle. Features such as the ability to lengthen the PVARP for one cycle after exiting the magnet or noise reversion modes or programming to a new mode, lengthen the PVARP for a single cycle following a PVC or revert to DVI pacing for one cycle following a PVC have been developed to recognize initiating events. A third solution. a tachycardia termination algorithm, can recognize and terminate PMT; varying the AV delay to determine whether P waves move in a corresponding manner and using a metabolic sensor to confirm the need for a fast heart rate are other possibilities in the detection of PMT. Diagnostic data features may also be used to evaluate the appropriateness of programmed settings. This discussion concludes that PMT is no longer a significant clinical entity when more advanced DDD pacemakers are utilized.     

A comparative study on the behavior of three different automatic mode switching dual chamber pacemakers to intracardiac recordings of clinical atrial fibrillation

Automatic mode switching (AMS) allows patients with dual chamber pacemakers who develop paroxysmal AF to have a controlled ventricular rate. The aim of this study was to (1) compare the rate-controlled behavior of three AMS algorithms in response to AF, in terms of speed and stability of response and resynchronization to sinus rhythm, and (2) compare the influence of pacemaker programming on optimal mode switching. We studied 17 patients (12 men, 5 women; mean age 59 +/- 15 years) who developed AF during electrophysiological study. Unfiltered bipolar atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm and AF were recorded onto high fidelity tapes and replayed into the atrial port of three dual chamber pacemakers with different mode switching algorithms (Thera, Marathon, Meta). The Thera pacemaker uses rate smoothing, and mode switches occur when mean sensed atrial rate exceeds the predefined AMS rate (MR). Marathon mode switches after a programmable number of consecutive rapid atrial events (NR). Meta DDDR monitors the atrial rate by a counter for atrial cycles faster than the programmed AMS rate. It increases or decreases the counter if the atrial cycle length is shorter or longer than the programmed AMS interval, respectively. Mode switch occurs when the AF detection criteria are met (CR). A total of 260 rhythms were studied. NR was significantly faster than MR and CR (latency 2.5 +/- 3 s vs 26 +/- 7 s vs 15 +/- 22 s, respectively, P < 0.0001). During sustained AF, MR resulted in the most stable and regular ventricular rhythm compared to NR or CR. In CR, ventricular rate oscillated between AMS and atrial tracking (cycle length variations: 44 +/- 2 s vs 346 +/- 109 s vs 672 +/- 84 s, P < 0.05). At resumption of sinus rhythm, MR resynchronized after 143 +/- 22 s versus 3.4 +/- 0.7 s for NR and 5.9 +/- 1.1 s for CR, resulting in long periods of AV dissociation when a VVI/VVIR mode is used after AMS. Programming of atrial refractory periods did not affect AMS response, although the speed of AMS onset can be adjusted by programming of onset criteria in the Meta DDDR. AMS algorithms differ in their ability to handle recorded clinical atrial arrhythmias. The rapid-responding algorithm exhibits rate instability, whereas slow responding algorithm shows a long delay in response and risk of AV dissociation. Thus different instrumentation of AMS may have clinical implications in patients with dual chamber pacemakers who develop AF.     

A New Pacemaker for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation of the AV Junction

Atrial fibrillation is a relative contraindication to atrial synchronous pacing because of the risk of the tracking of rapid atrial rhythms by the pacemaker. In this study, we describe the clinical results of an AV synchronous rate responsive pacemaker with an original algorithm, which is able to sense pathological increments in atrial rate and automatically to switch into a non-AV synchronous mode of pacing. This pacemaker was implanted in 12 patients who had undergone radiofrequency ablation of the A V junction in order to cure severely symptomatic, drug refractory, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In an acute, intrapatient comparison between the standard AV synchronous mode and the automatic switching mode, ventricular tracking of atrial fibrillation occurred in 35% and 4% of total beats at rest and in 24% and 2% of total beats during exercise, respectively (P < 0.001). During 5 ± 4 months of follow-up, no further tachyarrhythmia related symptoms occurred. In conclusion, the standard DDDR mode is unable to eliminate ventricular tracking of atrial fibrillation, thus undermining the efficacy of AV junction ablation therapy. The automatic switching mode eliminates this adverse effect of dual chamber pacing.     

Concealed Accessory Pathway Manifesting Clinically Only After Pacemaker Implantation

PINSKI, S.L., et al. : Concealed Accessory Pathway Manifesting Clinically Only After Pacemaker Implantation. A 66-year-old man with coronary artery disease and persistent left superior vena cava received a DDDR pacemaker for symptomatic 2:1 heart block. There was no previous history of tachyarrhythmias. Endless loop tachycardia and repetitive nonreentrant ventriculoatrial synchrony occurred afterwards and were triggered by a late coupled atrial premature beat. ECGs suggested a concealed left posterior accessory pathway that was confirmed during electrophysiological study. Effective palliation was achieved with extension of the PVARP and enabling noncompetitive atrial pacing operation.