Amantadine triple therapy for non-responder hepatitis C patients. Clues for controversies (ANRS HC 03 BITRI)

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether addition of amantadine to pegylated interferon/ribavirin improved response rates among chronic hepatitis C patients, non-responders to interferon/ribavirin and study the dynamic of response. METHODS: In a double blind, multicenter, randomized trial, 200 non-responder patients received pegylated interferon 1.5 microg/kg per week and ribavirin 800-1200 mg/day, plus either amantadine 200 mg/day or placebo for 48 weeks. Endpoints were virological responses, ALT normalization, and histological benefit overtime. RESULTS: Twenty percent of all patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). This rate was 8% higher in the triple therapy group (24%) compared with the double therapy group (16%) (P = 0.22). A better virological response rate at week 24 was observed in the triple regimen group (43 vs 29%; P = 0.06), which was lost at week 48 suggesting viral escape. The biochemical response rate was also significantly higher with triple therapy at week 12 (63 vs 49%; P = 0.05) and week 24 (64 vs 49%; P = 0.03). Fibrosis stabilized or improved in 77% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of interferon/ribavirin non-responder patients should be encouraged since a substantial proportion benefits from re-treatment with pegylated interferon/ribavirin +/- amantadine. In triple therapy involving amantadine, a time wise response and an increased SVR rate in subgroups less prone to viral breakthrough suggest clues for existing controversies.     

Triple therapy of interferon and ribavirin with zinc supplementation for patients with chronic hepatitis C： A randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM: To study the therapeutic effect of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin with zinc supplement on patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. METHODS: A total of 102 patients confirmed histologically to have chronic HCV infection with genotype 1b and more than 100 KIU/mL of HCV were randomly assigned to each arm of the study and each received 10 million units of pegylated interferon (IFN-alpha-2b) daily for 4 wk followed by the same dose every other day for 20 wk plus ribavirin (600 or 800 mg/d depending on body weight), with or without polaprezinc (150 mg/d) orally for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR) defined as negative HCV-RNA in the serum 6 mo after treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the clinical background between the two groups except for more females in the dual therapy group than in the other group (P<0.05). SVR was observed in 33.3% of the triple therapy group and 33.3% of the dual therapy group. The side effects were almost the same in both groups except for gastrointestinal symptoms, which were less in the triple therapy group (P=0.019). CONCLUSION: Considered together, triple therapy of zinc plus IFN and ribavirin for HCV infection patients with genotype 1b and high viral load is not better than dual therapy except for lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects.     

Triple therapy with amantadine in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: a placebo-controlled trial

The antiviral efficacy of amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C is controversial. In this randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, triple therapy with interferon alfa (IFN-alpha)-2a plus ribavirin and amantadine (amantadine group) was compared with combination therapy IFN-alpha plus ribavirin (control group). Four hundred previously untreated patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly allocated to treatment with amantadine sulphate (100 mg twice daily orally) or a matched placebo together with IFN-alpha induction plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg/day orally) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virologic response (SVR) defined as undetectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (<100 copies/mL) 24 weeks after the end of treatment. SVR was observed in 52% of the amantadine group and in 43.5% of the control group (P =.11). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the corresponding SVR rates were 39% and 31%, respectively. The virologic on-treatment response rate in week 24 was significantly higher in the amantadine group as compared with the control group (70% vs. 59%, respectively, P =.016). This beneficial effect was mainly related to HCV type 1-infected patients (63% vs. 47%, respectively, P =.012). Independent factors associated with SVR, according to multiple logistic regression analysis, were amantadine treatment, low baseline HCV RNA, platelet counts (>/=250/nL), pretreatment ALT quotient >/=3, and GGT level (<28 U/L) as well as HCV genotypes other than 1. In conclusion, although we could not demonstrate a significant advantage of the triple regimen in univariate analysis, multivariate analysis offers arguments that amantadine should be considered as a potential anti-HCV drug in future studies.     

Triple antiviral therapy as a new option for patients with interferon nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of triple antiviral therapy with interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine in comparison with interferon and ribavirin combination treatment in patients with interferon-nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C. We performed an open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial at a secondary referral center. We used a 2:1 ratio, patients received interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine, or interferon and ribavirin for 12 months, and were followed up for an additional 6 months. Ninety-four consecutive adult interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C were screened. Sixty consecutive elected patients entered the study. No patients withdrew because of adverse effects. Forty patients received interferon alfa (5 megaunits on alternate days), ribavirin (800-1,000 mg daily), and amantadine (200 mg daily) for 12 months, and 20 patients received the same treatment without amantadine. At the end of follow-up, alanine transaminase (ALT) level normalization was maintained in 23 of 40 patients (57%) after triple therapy, but in 2 of 20 patients (10%) after double therapy (P <.001, RR = 2.11, 95% CI, 1.43-3.12), whereas disappearance of serum HCV RNA persisted in 19 of 40 patients (48%) and in 1 of 20 patients (5%), respectively (P <.001, RR = 1.81, 95% CI, 1.32-2.47). The safety profile was similar in the 2 groups. In conclusion, in patients with interferon-nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C, triple antiviral therapy for 1 year results in a high rate of sustained biochemical and virologic responses.     

Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have failed prior treatment

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The most effective therapy currently available for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the combination of peginterferon and ribavirin. This study evaluated the effectiveness of this treatment in patients who were nonresponders to previous interferon-based therapy. METHODS: The first 604 patients enrolled in the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment Against Cirrhosis (HALT-C) Trial were evaluated. All were HCV RNA positive, previous nonresponders to interferon, with or without ribavirin, and had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis on liver biopsy (Ishak fibrosis stage 3-6). Patients were retreated with peginterferon alfa-2a 180 microg/wk plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day. Those with no detectable HCV RNA in serum at week 20 continued treatment for a total of 48 weeks and were then followed for an additional 24 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients had no detectable HCV RNA in serum at treatment week 20, and 18% achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). Factors associated with an SVR included previous treatment with interferon monotherapy, infection with genotypes 2 or 3, a lower AST:ALT ratio, and absence of cirrhosis. Reducing the dose of ribavirin from > or =80% to < or =60% of the starting dose during the first 20 weeks of treatment was associated with a decline in SVR from 21% to 11% (P < or = 0.05). In contrast, reducing the dose of peginterferon or reducing ribavirin after week 20, when HCV RNA was already undetectable, did not significantly affect SVR. CONCLUSIONS: Selected nonresponders to previous interferon-based therapy can achieve SVR following retreatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin.     

High-dose interferon-α2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with non-response or relapse after interferon-α monotherapy

AIM: To evaluate the daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of patients who failed with interferon monotherapy and had a relapse, based on the assumption that the viral burden would decline faster, thus increasing the likelihood of higher response rates in this difficult-to-treat patient group. METHODS: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study. Treatment was started with 10 MU IFN-alpha2b daily for 3 wk, followed by IFN-alpha2b 5 MU/TIW in combination with ribavirin (1 000-1 200 mg/d) for 21 wk. In case of a negative HCV RNA PCR, treatment was continued until wk 48 (IFN-alpha2b 3 MU/TIW+1 000-1 200 mg ribavirin/daily). RESULTS: The dose of IFN-alpha2b or ribavirin was reduced in 16% of patients because of hematologic side effects, and treatment was discontinued in 7% of patients. An early viral response (EVR) was achieved in 60% of patients. Fifty percent of all patients achieved an end-of-treatment response (EOT) and 40% obtained a sustained viral response (SVR). Patients with no response had a significantly lower response rate than those with a former relapse (SVR 30% vs 53%; P = 0.049). Furthermore, lower response rates were observed in patients infected with genotype 1a/b than in patients with non-1-genotype (SVR 28% vs 74%; P = 0.001). As a significant predictive factor for a sustained response, a rapid initial decline of HCV RNA could be identified. No patient achieving a negative HCV-RNA PCR at wk 18 or later eventually eliminated the virus. CONCLUSION: Daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-alpha2b is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of non-responders and relapsers, when interferon monotherapy fails. A fast decline of viral load during the first 12 wk is strongly associated with a sustained viral response.     

Twenty-four weeks of interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin for Japanese hepatitis C patients: sufficient treatment period for patients with genotype 2 but not for patients with genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA titer and HCV genotype are two major determinants of the outcome of interferon (IFN) monotherapy. To clarify the usefulness of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin in Japanese hepatitis C patients, we treated patients with a relatively high dose of IFN in combination with ribavirin for 24 weeks and examined the effects in relation to the viral parameters. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study. The patients received either 6 or 10 million units (MU) of interferon alpha-2b every day for 2 weeks and then three times a week for 22 weeks with a daily dose of either 600 or 800 mg of ribavirin. The treatment response and safety of this treatment were examined. RESULTS: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 26.8% in genotype 1 and 76.5% in genotype 2 (P < 0.001), and 36.1% with the 6 MU group and 45.8% with the 10 MU group (P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis indicated that SVR was associated with genotype 2, HCV RNA <500 kilointernational unit/ml (kIU/ml), and HCV RNA undetectability at week 8 of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that a 24-week course of IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy was effective with respect to virologic response in Japanese hepatitis C patients, particularly in patients with HCV genotype 2.     

High-dose interferon alpha-2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b with a high baseline viral load

Background Although pegylated interferon (IFN) is now used in many countries as a standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C, the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of high-dose interferon alpha-2b induction with ribavirin are not fully evaluated, especially in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b with a high viral load.Methods Patients (n = 83) received daily, high-dose induction therapy of interferon alpha-2b (6 million units [MU] once daily for 2 weeks), followed by 6MU three times weekly for 22 weeks. Oral ribavirin (800 or 600mg/day) was given daily for 24 weeks, and then the patients were followed up for 24 weeks.Results Of the 83 patients, 67 (81%) had a biochemical response (BR), and 37 (45%) achieved a sustained BR (SBR). Virologic response (VR; undetectable serum HCV RNA level by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) was noted in 55 (66%) patients, and sustained VR (SVR) in 16 (19%) patients. Baseline viral load did not influence treatment outcome. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome among treatment-naÏve patients, relapsers, and nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Multivariate analyses identified serum ribavirin concentrations at week 8 of therapy (odds ratio [OR], 23.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84–61.1; P = 0.015) and negativity for serum HCV RNA at week 8 (OR, 22.5; CI, 1.76–57.5; P = 0.017, respectively) as two significant and independent predictors of SVR.Conclusions The efficacy of 24-week combination therapy of high-dose IFN alpha-2b induction and ribavirin deserves attention in HCV genotype 1b patients with a high viral load, especially in nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy and patients with a very high viral load.     

Interferon alfa2a induction therapy in combination with ribavirin and amantadine for the treatment of naive patients with chronic HCV infection

Summary.  Pilot studies have suggested that the addition of amantadine to interferon (IFN) is effective against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Furthermore, IFN induction therapy seems to improve virological response rates. In this open, randomized, multicentre trial we compared safety and efficacy of a triple therapy comprising IFN α 2a, ribavirin and amantadine using high induction doses (6 MU IFN α daily for the first 6 weeks) against a therapy with standard IFN α dosages over the entire treatment period plus amantadine and ribavirin. A total of 158 naive patients with chronic HCV infection were randomized 1:1. Group A ( n  = 81): induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily for 6 weeks, followed by 6 MU three times a week (tiw) for 18 weeks and then 3 MU tiw until week 48. Group B ( n  = 77): standard therapy with 6 MU IFN α tiw for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU until week 48. All patients received oral ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) and amantadine (200 mg/day). The triple therapy was safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to biochemical response rates. Groups A and B did not differ in virological response rates at the end of treatment (33% vs 35%) or at the end of the 6 month follow up period (37% vs 39%). We could not detect favourable effects on sustained virological response rates using induction therapy, in either genotype 1 or non-1 infected patients. In summary, induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily did not result in increased overall response rates compared with standard IFN α dosages of 6 MU tiw.     

Re-treatment of previous non-responders and relapsers to interferon plus ribavirin with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD), ribavirin ± amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C: randomized multicentre clinical trial

Introduction. A large number of patients with chronic hepatitis C have not been cured with interferon-based therapy. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of amantadine combined with the standard of care (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) in patients who had not responded to or had relapsed after ≥ 24 weeks of treatment with conventional interferon plus ribavirin.Material and methods. Patients stratified by previous response (i.e., non-response or relapse) were randomized to 48 weeks of open-label treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 1,000/1,200 mg/day plus amantadine 200 mg/ day (triple therapy), or the standard of care (peginterferon alfa-2a [40KD] plus ribavirin).Results. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA in serum (< 50 lU/mL) at end of follow-up (week 72). Among patients with a previous non-response, 12/53 (22.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.3-36.2%) randomized to triple therapy achieved an SVR compared with 16/52 (30.8%; 95% CI 18.7-45.1%) randomized to the standard of care. Among patients with a previous relapse 22/39 (56.4%; 95% CI 39.6-72.2%) randomized to triple therapy achieved an SVR compared with 23/38 (60.5%; 95% CI 43.4-76.0%) randomized to the standard of care. Undetectable HCV RNA (< 50 IU/mL) at week 12 had a high positive predictive value for SVR. A substantial proportion of non-responders and relapsers to conventional interferon plus ribavirin achieve an SVR when re-treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin.Conclusion. Amantadine does not enhance SVR rates in previously treated patients with chronic hepatitis C and cannot be recommended in this setting.     

Interferon and ribavirin versus interferon and amantadine in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the potential efficacy and safety of a combination of interferon and ribavirin with that of interferon and amantadine in patients who had previously failed to respond to interferon monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to 3 million units of alpha-interferon three times weekly with 1000 mg of ribavirin daily (group A, n = 14) or an identical dose of alpha-interferon and amantadine hydrochloride given in a dose of 200 mg daily (group B, n = 15). Patients were treated for 24 wk and observed for 24 wk posttreatment. RESULTS: The treatment groups were evenly matched with respect to gender, frequency of genotype 1, presence of fibrosis, as well as baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HCV RNA levels. At the end of therapy, five of 14 or 36% of patients in group A versus 0 of 15 in group B had both normal serum ALT and nondetectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (p = 0.017). A complete response was sustained, however, in only two of 13 patients (15%) in group A who completed 24 wk of observation posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of interferon nonresponders have an end-of-treatment biochemical and virological response to a combination of interferon and ribavirin, and sustained responses are possible. The addition of amantadine to interferon, in contrast, does not seem to enhance the antiviral effectiveness of interferon in patients who have previously failed to respond.     

Pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C

AIM: To study the safety and efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa-2b, indigenously developed in India, plus ribavirin in treatment of hepatitis C virus(HCV). METHODS: One-hundred HCV patients were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter trial. Patients were treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg per week subcutaneously plus oral ribavirin 800 mg/d for patients with genotypes 2 and 3 for 24 wk. The same dose of peginterferon plus weight-based ribavirin(800 mg/d for ≤ 65 kg; 1000 mg/d for 65-85 kg; 1200 mg/d for 85-105 kg; 1400 mg/d for 105 kg body weight) was administered for 48 wk for patients with genotypes 1 and 4. Serological and biochemical responses of patients were assessed.RESULTS: Eighty-two patients(35 in genotypes 1 and 4 and 47 in 2 and 3), completed the study. In genotype 1, 25.9% of patients achieved rapid virologic response(RVR): while the figures were 74.1% for early virologic response(EVR) and 44.4% for sustained virologic response(SVR). For genotypes 2 and 3, all patients bar one belonged to genotype 3, and of those, 71.4%, 87.5%, and 64.3% achieved RVR, EVR, and SVR, respectively. In genotype 4, 58.8%, 88.2%, and 52.9% of patients achieved RVR, EVR, and SVR, respectively. The majority of patients attained normal levels of alanine aminotransferase by 4-12 wk of therapy. Most patients showed a good tolerance for the treatment, although mild-to-moderate adverse events were exhibited; only two patients discontinued the study medication due to serious adverse events(SAEs). Eleven SAEs were observed in nine patients; however, only four SAEs were related to study medication.CONCLUSION: Peginterferon alfa-2b, which was developed in India, in combination with ribavirin, is a safe and effective drug in the treatment of HCV.     

Efficacy of triple therapy with thymalfasin,peginterferon α-2a,and ribavirin for the treatment of hispanic chronic HCV nonresponders: Original Article

Background/Aims: Thymalfasin has shown efficacy in the treatment of chronic HCV infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy with thymalfasin, peginterferon α-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a), and ribavirin in Hispanic patients with chronic viral hepatitis C who were nonresponders to prior treatment with interferon alfa (IFN-α)/ribavirin. Methods: In this open-label study, 40 subjects received thymalfasin (1.6 mg twice a week), PEG-IFN α-2a (180 μg once a week), and ribavirin (800-1,000 mg/ day) for 48 weeks. All patients had positive HCV RNA by PCR analysis, abnormal levels of ALT, compensated hepatic disease, and liver biopsy with chronic damage. Results: Viral response was observed in 52.5% patients at week 12 and 50% at week 24. Of the per protocol group, 52.6% showed an end-of-treatment response at week 48 and 21.1% achieved an SVR at week 72. Among genotype 1 patients, 23.5% achieved an SVR at week 72. A reduction of the dose of PEG IFN α-2a and ribavirin was required. Thymalfasin was well tolerated without dose reduction. Conclusion: Triple therapy with thymalfasin, PEG IFN α-2a, and ribavirin is an effective treatment option for difficult-to-treat HCV patients who are refractory to prior conventional treatment, with adequate tolerability.     

聚乙二醇干扰素加利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎疗效影响因素分析

目的研究聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎（丙肝）疗效的影响因素。方法101例慢性丙肝患者均给予聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a 180μg／周联合利巴韦林10．6～15．0mg／（kg·d）,疗程48周,分析性别、体重指数（body mass index,BMI）、初始HCVRNA定量、ALT及GLU等对持续病毒学应答（sustainedvirologicresponse,SVR）的影响。结果聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙肝总的SVR率为50％,其中获得快速病毒学应答（rapid virologic response．RVR）和早期病毒学应答（early virologic response,EVR）患者实现SVR达100％,未获得RVR和EVR患者实现SVR为19．35％;高BMI值、发生脂肪肝的患者不容易达到SVR,而糖化血红蛋白、初始HCVRNA载量高、GLU、ALT及性别对SVR无影响。结论RVR、EVR可以预测SVR;BMI、是否合并脂肪肝是聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙肝获得SVR的影响因素。     

Effect of interferon and ribavirin combined with amantadine in interferon and ribavirin non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C （genotype 1）

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of amantadine plus interferon-alpha and ribavirin in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Twenty-six non-responder patients received the regimen of IFN-α-2a at a dose of 6 million units three times a week, 1 000-1 200 mg of ribavirin daily, and 200 mg of amantadine daily in divided doses over 48 wk. After the end of treatment, at the 72nd wk, a sustained viral response rate was determined. RESULTS: An early (after 12 wk of therapy) response was seen in 34.6% (9/26) of patients. Response rate at the 24th wk was 42.3% (11/26). End of treatment response (ETR) was 53.8% (14/26). Sustained viral response (SVR) was 42.3% (11/26). There was a statistically significant difference between 0 and 12 wk (P= 0.04), 0 and 24 wk (P= 0.01), 0 and 48 wk (P= 0.00), and 0 and 72 wk (P= 0.001). No patient had severe adverse effects during the treatment. CONCLUSION: Combination regimen of interferon-α, ribavirin and amantadine can enhance sustained viral response on IFN-α and ribavirin non-responder patients with HCV. Triple therapy with amantadine should be evaluated in further studies.     

Interferon alfa-2b [correction of alpha-2b]and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C and normal ALT

OBJECTIVES: Most studies establishing the role of antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) excluded the patients with normal ALT levels. Small trials with interferon monotherapy suggested a limited efficacy and/or de novo ALT elevations. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of two doses of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) with ribavirin (RBV) in patients with normal ALT [correction]. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven CHC with detectable HCV RNA and at least two normal ALT levels three or more months apart were randomized to receive either 3 or 5 million units of IFN thrice a week plus RBV 1,000-1,200 mg. Therapy was stopped at 24 wk if HCV RNA remained detectable and continued for an additional 24 wk if HCV RNA was undetectable. A final HCV RNA level was obtained 24 wk after discontinuation of therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were randomized and received at least one dose of treatment. The overall rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) was 32%. SVR rates were higher in genotype 2 and 3 patients (80%) than in genotype 1 patients (24%, p = 0.002). There was a tendency toward higher SVR in genotype 1 patients treated with the higher IFN dose (36%vs 10%, p = 0.07). Five patients had mild, transient ALT elevations. No sustained ALT elevations were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with normal ALT had a rate of SVR comparable to that reported in patients with elevated ALT. Higher dose of interferon tended to be more effective in genotype 1 infected patients. De novo ALT elevations were transient and not clinically significant. Patients with CHC should not be excluded from treatment on the basis of ALT alone. Combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin should be evaluated in these patients.     

High-dose interferon-α2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with non-response or relapse after interferon-α monotherapy

AIM: To evaluate the daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-α2b (IFN-α2b) in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of patients who failed with interferon monotherapy and had a relapse, based on the assumption that the viral burden would decline faster, thus increasing the likelihood of higher response rates in this diffficult-to-treat patient group.METHODS: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study.Treatment was started with 10 MU IFN-α2b daily for 3 wk,followed by IFN-α2b 5 MU/TIW in combination with ribavirin (1 000-1 200 mg/d) for 21 wk. In case of a negative HCV RNA PCR, treatment was continued until wk 48 (IFN-α2b 3 MU/TIW+1 000-1 200 mg ribavirin/daily).RESULTS: The dose of IFN-α2b or ribavirin was reduced in 16% of patients because of hematologic side effects,and treatment was discontinued in 7% of patients. An early viral response (EVR) was achieved in 60% of patients. Fifty percent of all patients achieved an end-of-treatment response (EOT) and 40% obtained a sustained viral response (SVR). Patients with no response had a significantly lower response rate than those with a former relapse (SVR 30% vs 53%; P = 0.049). Furthermore,lower response rates were observed in patients infected with genotype 1a/b than in patients with non-1-genotype (SVR 28% vs74%; P= 0.001). As a significant predictive factor for a sustained response, a rapid initial decline of HCV RNA could be identified. No patient achieving a negative HCV-RNA PCR at wk 18 or later eventually eliminated the virus.CONCLUSION: Daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-α2b is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of non-responders and relapsers, when interferon monotherapy fails. A fast decline of viral load during the first 12 wk is strongly associated with a sustained viral response.     

A randomized trial of pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of combination therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) alpha plus ribavirin (RBV) in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in patients who previously failed combination standard IFN plus RBV or IFN monotherapy has not been well established. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-one CHC patients including virologic nonresponders to combination IFN plus RBV (n = 219) or IFN monotherapy (n = 47), and relapsers to combination therapy (n = 55) were randomized to receive PEG IFN alpha-2b 1.5 microg/kg per wk plus RBV 800 mg per day (Regimen A, n = 160) or PEG IFN alpha-2b 1.0 microg/kg per wk plus RBV 1,000-1,200 mg per day (Regimen B, n = 161) for 48 wks. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred in 16% of the overall study population (Regimen A vs B, 18%vs 13%, p= 0.21), in 8% of the combination therapy nonresponders (10%vs 6%, p= 0.35), in 21% of the IFN monotherapy nonresponders (16%vs 27%, p= 0.35), and in 42% of the combination therapy relapsers (50%vs 32%, p= 0.18). In nonresponders to prior combination therapy, HCV ribonucleic acid levels <100,000 copies/mL at the end of the prior treatment course were associated with an increased SVR compared with levels >or=100,000 copies/mL (21%vs 5%, p= 0.002). In the overall study population, genotype 1 patients had lower SVR rates than others (14%vs 33%, p= 0.01), and African Americans had lower SVR than Caucasians (4%vs 18%, p= 0.01). CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with PEG IFN alpha-2b plus RBV is more effective in patients who relapsed after combination standard IFN plus RBV than in nonresponders to either combination therapy or IFN monotherapy. There was no significant effect of dosing regimen.     

Efficacy of interferon alpha-2b induction therapy before retreatment for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) patients who have failed previous treatment have low sustained viral response (SVR) rates with repeat treatment. We evaluated whether interferon (IFN) induction during retreatment improves response rates. METHODS: Two randomized, controlled trials were conducted in chronic HCV patients who failed IFN. In Study 1, patients received IFN 3 MU daily plus ribavirin (RBV) 1000 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 44 weeks (induction; n=232), or IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=237). In Study 2, patients received IFN 5 MU B.I.D. plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 46 weeks (induction; n=201), or PEG-IFN 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=206). The primary end point for both trials was SVR. RESULTS: Induction did not increase SVR compared with non-induction, but did increase the on-treatment response among genotype non-1 patients in Study 2. By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, SVR in Study 1 was 13% for induction vs. 9% for non-induction (P=NS). In Study 2 (ITT), SVR was 20% for induction vs. 24% for non-induction (P=NS). However, by non-ITT analysis of Study 2, genotype non-1-previous non-responders showed significantly higher response rates with induction than non-induction. CONCLUSION: For chronic HCV patients who have failed IFN, induction with retreatment does not improve SVR, but may be beneficial for patients with genotype non-1 HCV.     

A randomized trial of induction doses of interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine for treatment of nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment. Methods The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-α2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-α2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-α2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks. Results On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%). Conclusions Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.