采用腹腔镜处理急腹症的体会

目的总结腹腔镜在急腹症处理中的休会。方法回顾性分析我科2003年7月至2008年7月应用腹腔镜处理112例急腹症的临床资料。结果108例在腹腔镜下获得明确诊断;92例在腹腔镜下完成操作,20例中转开腹手术;纠正术前诊断2例,发现合并疾病3例;术后并发症2例。结论腹腔镜技术处理腹部外科急腹症创伤小,对诊断不明和腹部外伤的急诊诊断率高,降低阴性剖腹探查率,术中探查全面、安全有效,值得进一步推广。     

Operative laparoscopy in the management of perforated peptic ulcer

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic approach in the management of perforated peptic ulcers. From January 1997 to December 2002, all patients referred to our community hospital for abdominal surgical emergencies were routinely managed by laparoscopic surgery. A review was carried out on 39 consecutive patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcers with or without generalised peritonitis. The study population comprised 24 male and 15 female patients, aged 30 to 94 years (mean age: 62 +/- 18). Laparoscopic repair was attempted in all patients. Laparoscopy afforded the correct diagnosis in all cases. Laparoscopic peritoneal washout (irrigation and suction of the entire abdominal cavity) with simple suture of the perforation proved successful in 34 patients. An additional omental patching was performed in 15 of these cases. Conversion to conventional open surgery was necessary in 5 patients. The morbidity and mortality rates were 13% and 10%, respectively. The mean operative time was 77 minutes (range: 40-120) and the mean hospital stay 9 days (range: 3-22). Laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcers is technically feasible but requires sound experience in laparoscopic abdominal emergencies. This study shows that the mini-invasive procedure is safe and effective, offering a valid alternative to traditional laparotomy.     

Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of nontraumatic acute abdominal pain in women

PURPOSE: We reviewed the records of 77 women treated for nontraumatic acute abdomen by the principal author between June 1991 and June 1996. All patients presented to either the surgeon's office or the emergency room at Northwest Hospital, which is an urban community hospital in North Seattle. Our objectives in the study were to determine the effectiveness of diagnostic laparoscopy for nontraumatic acute abdomen and the percentage of cases managed using laparoscopic technique exclusively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The mean patient age was 36.5 (range 12-65) years. The majority of these women (92%) were premenopausal. Seventy-two (93.5%) were Caucasian, and the remaining 5 (6.5%) were Asian. Thirty-eight of the women (49%) had undergone at least one prior pelvic or abdominal operation, and 28 (36%) had undergone more than one. The principal author performed preoperative clinical evaluations, then diagnostic laparoscopy for all 77 patients. RESULTS: Laparoscopy provided a definitive diagnosis in 76 of the 77 cases. In 70% of the cases (54 of 77) the preoperative diagnosis was confirmed by diagnostic laparoscopy, and in 29% (22 of 77), the diagnosis was confirmed, yet augmented or clarified, by diagnostic laparoscopy. In the remaining case, diagnostic laparoscopy ruled out any acute etiology. Ninety-five percent of the patients (72 of 76) were treated exclusively by laparoscopy (70 cases) or a laparoscopy-assisted procedure (2 cases). Four patients (5%) required conversion to laparotomy. The remaining patient required no therapeutic surgery. Mortality was 0 and morbidity 4%. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of women presenting with acute abdominal pain can be managed using a laparoscopic technique exclusively.     

Emergency laparoscopyrid=""

BACKGROUND: By now, laparoscopic surgery has achieved widespread acceptance among surgeons and, generally speaking, by the public. Therefore, we set out to evaluate whether this technique is a feasible method of treating patients with abdominal emergencies, traumatic or not. To assess the routine use of emergency laparoscopy in a community hospital setting, we undertook a retrospective analysis of an unrandomized experience (presence or absence of a surgeon with laparoscopic experience). METHODS: Between January 1993 and October 1998, 575 emergency abdominal surgical procedures were done in our department. In all, 365 (63.4%) were diagnostic and operative laparoscopy procedures (acute small bowel obstruction: 23 cases; hernia disease: one case; gastroduodenal ulcer disease: 15 cases; biliary system disease: 89 cases; pelvic disease: 237 cases). These cases represent almost 56% of all laparoscopic procedures done during the same period at our institution. Laparoscopy was not performed in patients with a history of a previous abdominal approach to malignant disease, a history of more than two major abdominal surgeries, or massive bowel distension; nor was it used in patients whose general conditions contraindicate this approach. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 6.8%. The morbidity and mortality rates were, respectively, 4.1% and 0.8%. A definitive diagnosis was provided in 95.3% of cases, with the possibility to treat 88.2% of them by laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the laparoscopic approach in patients with abdominal emergencies to be feasible and safe in experienced hands. It provides diagnostic accuracy as well as therapeutic capabilities. Sparing patients laparotomy reduces postoperative pain, improves recovery of GI function, reduces hospitalization, cuts health care costs, and improves cosmetic results. This approach promises to play a significant role in emergency abdominal situations and will certainly become increasingly important in today's health care environment.     

The role of laparoscopy in patients with suspected peritonitis: experience of a single institution

PURPOSE: In this report, we retrospectively evaluate the effect of a laparoscopic approach in the diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal pain in patients with suspected peritonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the clinical records of patients admitted to our institution between January 1995 and July 2001 with a diagnosis of acute abdomen and suspected peritonitis. RESULTS: Ninety four of 229 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. In this series, 83 (88.3%) of the cases were successfully treated by emergent laparoscopy for an acute abdomen. Eleven (11.7%) required conversion to an open laparotomy procedure. Overall, the preoperative diagnosis was confirmed by laparoscopy in 67 (71.27%) of the cases. It was not confirmed in 27 (28.73%). Postoperative mortality was 4.25%. Morbidity was 8.5%. DISCUSSION: Data reported in the literature establish that laparoscopy offers adequate visualization of the entire abdomen and pelvic cavity in the diagnosis of an abdomen acute secondary to peritonitis. In this series, laparoscopy confirmed the diagnosis in 97.8% of the patients, and minimally invasive treatment was achieved in 88.3% of the cases. Female patients with gynecologic disease particularly benefitted from a laparoscopic approach, which permitted the correct evaluation of this condition and may have prevented unnecessary laparotomy. We believe that laparoscopy is an accurate modality for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with an acute abdomen and suspected peritonitis when the diagnosis cannot be clearly made by physical examination and noninvasive methods.     

Quality-of-life outcomes with laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy

Background: The purpose of this article is to describe our experience using laparoscopy in the management of emergent and acute abdominal conditions. Methods: Between March 1997 and November 2001, 277 consecutive minimally invasive procedures were performed for various nontrauma surgical emergencies. The indications for operation were nonspecific abdominal pain in 129 cases (46%), peritonitis in 64 cases (23%), small bowel obstruction in 52 cases (19%), complications after previous surgery or invasive procedures in 24 cases (9%), and sepsis of unknown origin in 8 cases (3%). Results: Laparoscopy obtained a correct diagnosis in 98.6% of the cases. In 207 patients (75%), the procedure was completed laparoscopically. An additional 35 patients (12.5%) required a target incision. The remaining 35 patients (12.5%) underwent formal laparotomy. The morbidity rate was 5.8%. No laparoscopy-related mortality was observed. Conclusions: For patients with abdominal emergencies, the laparoscopic approach provides diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic options, avoids extensive preoperative studies, averts delays in operative intervention, and appears to reduce morbidity. Preliminary results presented at the 9th European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.) Annual Congress, Maastricht the Netherlands, 13–16 June 2001     

Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for converting laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy

Performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) always carries the risk of having to convert from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy (LOC). Being able to identify these patients preoperatively may allow better preoperative planning and lowering operative cost. All LC and LOC were performed by the Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Surgery retrospectively identified between January 2008 and December 2009. Preoperative risk factors identified in both groups included: age, gender, body mass index greater than 30 kg/m(2), diabetes mellitus, previous upper abdominal surgery, previous abdominal surgery, presence of pericholecystic fluid, gallbladder wall thickness greater than 3 mm, preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, and pancreatitis. Reasons for conversion in the LOC group were identified from the operative note. A total of 346 LC and LOC were identified. The LOC group had 41 identified with a conversion rate of 11.9 per cent. The LOC group was compared with 100 randomly chosen LC. Risk factors that reached statistical significance for conversion included advanced age, male gender, previous upper abdominal surgery, preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, and gallbladder wall thickness greater than 3 mm (P = 0.0009). Average operative time was higher in LOC compared with open cholecystectomy (123 minutes average vs 109 minutes average). Of the reasons for conversion, the degree of inflammation was the most common (51.2%). Preoperative risk factors that were associated with need for conversion were advanced age, male gender, previous upper abdominal surgery, preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, and pericholecystitic fluid. In patients who have all of these risk factors, we recommend starting with an open cholecystectomy. This will save operative time and overall cost.     

The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy has rapidly emerged as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows for a correct diagnosis and proper treatment. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment--exploration and surgery--can be accomplished via laparoscopy. The aim of the present work is to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control experience with laparoscopic versus open surgery for abdominal emergencies performed at our institution. METHODS: From January 1992 to January 2002, 935 patients (mean age, 42.3+/-17.2 years) underwent emergent or urgent surgery, or both. Of these, 602 (64.3%) were operated on laparoscopically (small bowel obstruction, 28; gastroduodenal ulcer disease, 25; biliary disease, 165; pelvic disease, 370 cases; colonic perforations, 14) based on the availability of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy. Patients with a history of malignancy, more than 2 previous major abdominal surgeries, or massive bowel distension were not treated laparoscopically. Peritonitis was not deemed a contraindication to laparoscopy. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 5.8% and was mainly due to the presence of dense intraabdominal adhesions. Major complications ranged as high as 2.1% with a postoperative mortality of 0.6%. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 96.3% of cases, and 94.1% of these patients were treated successfully with laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Even if limited by its retrospective nature, the present experience shows that the laparoscopic approach to abdominal emergencies is as safe and effective as conventional surgery, has a higher diagnostic yield, and results in less trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make laparoscopy an attractive alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal emergencies.     

The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndromes

Background: Diagnostic laparoscopy plays a significant role in the evaluation of acute and chronic abdominal pain in the era of therapeutic laparoscopic surgery. Methods: We referred to our personal series of laparoscopy for both acute and chronic abdominal pain. This is a retrospective review of data accumulated prospectively between 1979 and the present. Results: In our series, 387 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopy because of abdominal pain. In a group of 121 patients with acute abdominal pain, a definitive diagnosis was made in 119 cases (98%). Two patients needed laparotomy to confirm the diagnosis; both had a disease process that did not require laparotomy to treat. A definitive therapeutic laparoscopic procedure was performed in 53 cases 944%). In 45 patients (38%), a diagnosis was made that did not require therapeutic laparoscopy or laparotomy to treat. In the remaining 21 patients (17.5%), exploratory laparotomy was needed to treat the condition. In a chronic abdominal pain group of 265 patients, the etiology was established laparoscopically in 201 cases (76%). A definitive therapeutic laparoscopic procedure was performed in 128 patients (48%). There was a normal laparoscopic examination in 64 patients (24%). There was one false negative laparoscopy that required laparotomy to treat 1 month later. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is an accurate modality for the diagnosis of both acute and chronic abdominal pain syndromes. These data support the use of laparoscopy as the primary invasive intervention in patients with acute and chronic abdominal pain. Received: 24 March 1997/Accepted: 4 September 1997     

The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed?

Background Laparoscopy has been practiced more and more in the management of abdominal emergencies. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control 5-year experience of laparoscopic versus open surgery for abdominal emergencies carried out at our institution, especially with regard to whether our attitude toward use of this procedure has changed as compared with the beginning of our laparoscopic emergency experience (1991–2002). Materials and Methods From January 2002 to January 2007 a total of 670 patients underwent emergent and/or urgent laparoscopy (small bowel obstruction, 17; gastroduodenal ulcer disease, 16; biliary disease, 118; pelvic disease and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), 512; colonic perforations, 7) at the hands of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy Results The conversion rate was 0.15%. Major complications ranged as high as 1.9% with no postoperative mortality. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 98.3% of the cases, and all such patients were treated successfully by laparoscopy. Conclusions We believe that laparoscopy is not an alternative to physical examination/good clinical judgment or to conventional noninvasive diagnostic methods in treating the patient with symptoms of an acute abdomen. However it must be considered an effective option in treating patients in whom these methods fail and as a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal emergencies.     

Laparoscopy: an excellent tool in the management of primary omental torsion in children

INTRODUCTION: Primary omental torsion (POT) is an uncommon acute condition, often occurring in obese children. The clinical presentation usually mimics that of acute appendicitis, and preoperative radiologic imaging may not be helpful in the diagnosis. In this paper, we report our experience of using laparoscopy in diagnosing and treating POT in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all cases of POT from 1998 to 2006 was performed. The efficacy and safety of using the laparoscope in the management of omental torsion was assessed. RESULTS: There were 5 boys with a mean age of 8.8 years (range, 5-11) included in the study. The majority of the patients were overweight, and all presented with abdominal pain without other gastrointestinal symptoms. In all patients, there was marked localized tenderness at the right side but without rebound tenderness or guarding. Preoperative investigations did not help in the diagnosis in all cases. A laparoscopic examination was performed and, in all cases, the diagnosis of POT was accurately made. The omentum was either adherent to the anterior abdominal wall or to the ascending colon. In all cases, the twisted omentum was successfully removed by the laparoscopic technique. Rapid recovery was universally observed, with the disappearance of pain and a rapid resumption of diet and discharge from the hospital on the first postoperative day. Histology showed gangrenous omentum in all cases. All the patients were well and had good cosmetic results on the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is an excellent tool for both diagnosing and treating omental torsion in children.     

Role of appendectomy in training for laparoscopic surgery

Background: This study aimed to evaluate a program of training in laparoscopic surgery based on clinical practice in the emergency room, in which laparoscopic appendectomy is the first technique that residents perform as surgeons. Methods: A prospective nonrandomized study was conducted involving all the laparoscopies performed in emergencies with a diagnosis of acute abdomen, appendicular in origin, during the period between June 1991 and December 1997. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between residents and assistants in terms of conversion rates (22/242 vs 15/158), mean hospital stay for each type of surgeon (5.2 days for residents and 5.1 days for assistants), and complications (12.8% for residents and 13.7% for assistants). Operating time, was significantly longer (p < 0.05) for residents (52.2 min) than for assistants (48 min). Conclusions: Apprenticeship in laparoscopic appendectomy can be accomplished with gradual clinical training and without the need for resort to animal experimentation laboratories.     

Gynecologic abnormalities in surgically treated women with stage II or III rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The objective of this article is to review the incidence and management of gynecologic abnormalities in women undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review utilizing the Johns Hopkins Tumor Registry and Pathology database. Eighty-six female patients who underwent abdominal surgery between 1985 and 1996 for Stage II or Stage III rectal cancer were identified. Data gathered included: patient demographics, history, intraoperative findings and complications, cancer stage and histology, adjuvant treatments, and followup. Specific attention was focused on the diagnosis, management, and followup of concurrent gynecologic problems. RESULTS: At the time of surgery, nineteen women (22%) had previously undergone hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Of the remaining 67 patients, 25 (37%) were found to have gynecologic abnormalities at the time of surgery, 15 (22%) underwent adnexectomy or hysterectomy or both. Forty-two women (63%) had normal internal genitalia. Of the 61 peri- and postmenopausal women, nine underwent bilateral oophorectomy for therapeutic reasons. No prophylactic oophorectomies were performed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Incidental pathologic findings necessitating gynecological procedures are common in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. These findings are frequently suboptimally assessed and managed in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods. Colorectal surgeons operating on women with Stage II and III rectal cancer should be cognizant of the high likelihood of identifying incidental gynecologic pathology and be prepared for definitive management of the pathology. The utilization of prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women undergoing surgery for rectal cancer is currently not optimal; preoperative discussion should address this option.     

Laparoscopic management of acute torsion of the omentum in adults.

BACKGROUND: Acute torsion of the greater omentum is a rare cause of acute abdomen in adults. We report our experience on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of this condition. METHOD: This is a retrospective review of 9 patients who had a clinicopathologic diagnosis of acute torsion of the greater omentum and were treated at the Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital from January 1994 to March 2004. Eight patients were male and 1 was female with a median age of 43 years (range, 24 to 65). Median body mass index was 24 kg/m(2) (range, 22 to 24). All presented with acute abdominal pain with a median temperature of 36.8 degrees C (range, 36.5 to 37.2) and a median white cell count of 9.5 x 10(9)/L (range, 7.4 to 15.1 x 10(9)). Preoperative ultrasound was done in 5 patients. RESULTS: All diagnoses were made during surgery. Resection of the infarcted omentum was performed for all patients (5 laparoscopic resections and 4 open resections). No postoperative complications occurred. The overall median time from admission to operation was 23 hours (range, 2 to 98). The overall median operating time and postoperative stay were 70 minutes (range, 38 to 105) and 3 days (range, 1 to 6), respectively. The median oral and parenteral analgesic requirement for postoperative pain control was less and the median hospital stay was shorter in patients who underwent laparoscopic resection. CONCLUSION: Acute torsion of the greater omentum is an uncommon cause of acute abdomen in adults, and preoperative diagnosis is usually difficult. Laparoscopy seems a safe and minimally invasive technique for both diagnosis and treatment of this rare disease entity.     

Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis

Background: Diagnostic laparoscopy has been introduced as a new diagnostic tool for patients with acute appendicitis. We performed diagnostic laparoscopy when the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis was in doubt. The aims of this study were to evaluate this strategy and to analyze the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis. Patients and Methods: All patients referred to our hospital with suspected appendicitis during the period 1994–1997 were evaluated prospectively. The clinical diagnosis was determined by the surgeon or resident on call based on the patient's history, physical examination, and leukocyte count. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1: appendicitis not likely. These patients were observed for 24 h or discharged. When they showed signs of appendicitis in 24 h, they were transferred to either group 2 or 3; group 2: doubt concerning diagnosis. These patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and appendectomy was performed if indicated; group 3: In these patients the diagnosis appendicitis was felt to be certain. They were treated by primary appendectomy by an open procedure. In this study, 1,050 patients, 531 women (51%), 389 men (37%), and 130 children (12%) <11 yrs, were evaluated. Results: Altogether, 377 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed, leaving 109 healthy-looking appendices in place. This reduced the negative appendectomy rate from 25% to 14% in all surgically managed patients. The negative appendectomy rate for the women in group 2 was reduced from 49% to 14%, and for the men from 22% to 11%, so it also seemed worthwhile to perform diagnostic laparoscopy in men. Because the appendix sana was left in place in only three children, the benefit from laparoscopy is relatively small for children. In 48% of these patients a second diagnosis was obtained, most of them gynecologic in nature. There were no false-negative laparoscopies and no complications resulting from the laparoscopic procedure. Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe procedure that reduced the appendix sana rate without increasing the total number of operations. It is a useful method for obtaining other, mostly gynecologic, diagnoses. To further reduce the appendix sana rate, better criteria for laparoscopic assessment of the appendix are needed. Received: 7 September 1999/Accepted: 21 February 2000/Online publication: 22 August 2000     

Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy as definitive therapy for acute cholecystitis

The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute calculous cholecystitis. A prospective data collection was performed on all patients admitted to one surgical service over a 2-year period. The patients were managed by a uniform protocol consisting of (1) preoperative ERCP when common duct stones were suspected; (2) operation within 24 h of diagnosis; and (3) selective operative cholangiography. Previous surgery was not a contraindication to inclusion. The setting was an urban teaching hospital. There were 52 patients, 34 females and 18 males. Nineteen had undergone previous abdominal surgery. Five patients had preoperative ERCP and five had intraoperative cholangiography. The patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy 0.8±0.4 days postadmission. Four (7.7%) were converted to open cholecystectomy. Fifty-eight percent had spillage of bile and/or stones. Patients went home 2.3±1.6 days postoperatively. There were no deaths and two complications: a subhepatic biloma and a superficial wound infection. Follow-up of all patients has revealed no late complications. We conclude: (1) Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective for acute cholecystitis even when complicated by previous surgery, inflammatory adhesions, and gangrene. (2) Intraoperative spillage of bile and stones does not lead to an increase in early complications. (3) Cholangiography is needed only when clinically indicated. (4) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be the treatment of choice for patients admitted for acute cholecystitis.     

Laparoscopy in gynecologic emergencies

Laparoscopy is ideal for the diagnosis of acute pelvic pain and the treatment of gynecologic emergencies. It is as safe and effective as laparotomy for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cysts, dermoid cysts, and adnexal torsion. Treatment with laparoscopy results in shorter hospital stay and faster recovery. Future fertility is not compromised and in some cases may be improved with laparoscopic treatment. There are also studies suggesting that laparoscopy can be used safely for the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic emergencies in the first and second trimester of pregnancy.     

Functional Results Following Elective Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy After CT-Proven Diagnosis of Acute Diverticulitis Evaluation of 43 Patients and Review of the Literature

We performed a prospective study to analyze the functional results following elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for computed tomography (CT)-proven diagnosis of acute diverticulitis and review the literature. Forty-three of 45 available patients (96%) who had laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for CT-proven acute diverticulitis answered, after a mean time of 40 months, a questionnaire exploring new abdominal symptoms, bowel function, and the patient’s own judgement of the surgical outcome. Surgical technique aimed at removing all the sigmoid by taking down the splenic flexure and do a colorectal anastomosis. Four patients (9%) complained of new abdominal pain. Bowel function was reported as better for 24 patients (56%), unchanged for 16 patients (37%), and worse for 3 (7%). Twenty patients (47%) considered their final result as excellent to good, 17 patients (40%) as satisfying, and 6 patients (13%) as mediocre. Male gender, absence of preoperative history compatible with an irritable bowel syndrome, length of resected sigmoid and residual acute inflammation on histology are statistically predictive of a better postoperative degree of satisfaction. After elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for CT-proven diverticulitis, a great majority of patients are very satisfied with their postoperative general comfort.     

Emergency laparoscopic surgery

The laparoscopic approach has represented a major step forward in general and emergency surgery. Its application in the emergency setting still raises a number of concerns that limit its more widespread use. To assess the true scope of laparoscopic surgery in the acute abdominal setting, we retrospectively evaluated our experience. From February 2003 to June 2007, 314 patients underwent an emergency laparoscopic operation, for low abdominal pain (193 patients), acute cholecystitis (78 patients), bowel obstruction (18 patients), diffuse peritonitis (16 patients), blunt abdominal trauma (6 patients), and acute pancreatitis (3 patients). Laparoscopy yielded a good diagnostic definition in all cases. The conversion rate was 16.6% (52 patients). Mean operative time was 63 +/- 29 minutes. The general major morbidity rate was 1.5% (4 patients) and the mortality rate was 0.4% (1 pt.). The laparoscopic approach in patients with abdominal emergencies is a useful tool that yields a reliable diagnostic definition in uncertain cases and allows minimal access treatment of the causative disease in the majority of cases.     

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease and gallstones are common causes of upper abdominal pain. The benefits of routine gastrostroscopy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been controversial. Some cases of persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been attributed to peptic ulcer disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the significance of preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We compared a group of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and a group of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with no preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Postoperative residual abdominal pain, esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, hospital stay, and other variables were examined. RESULTS: There were 400 patients in this study: 218 (54.5%) patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy while 182 (45.5%) did not. The mean age was 49.8 years, 311 were female and 89 were male patients. One hundred and twenty seven (31.7%) patients were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis and 273 (68.2%) were nonacute. In the esophagogastroduodenoscopy group, there were normal findings in 98 (45%) patients. Disorders such as hiatus hernia (21%), acute duodenal ulcers (3.6%), esophagitis (3.6%), gastric ulcer (0.4%), and Barrett's esophagus (0.4%) were among the findings. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was avoided in six patients with chronic cholecystitis. Preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not reduce the incidence of postoperative residual abdominal pain; in fact, patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy had longer hospital stays (P = 0.02). Unlike chronic cholecystitis, esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not change the course of the planned surgery in acute cholecystitis. CONCLUSION: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not have an impact on postoperative residual abdominal pain; however, it can disclose other gastroesophageal disorders with similar symptoms to gallstones and may change the course of the planned surgery in chronic cholecystitis.