Benefits of continuous infusion epidural analgesia throughout vaginal delivery

Two groups of nulliparous women with fetuses in singleton vertex presentation received continuous infusion epidural analgesia (EDA) with bupivacaine: group A (90 parturients) without infusion analgesia in the second stage of labor and group B (90 parturients) with infusion analgesia throughout delivery. The groups were compared regarding pain relief, duration of the second stage, persistent malrotation of the fetal head, and rate of instrumental vaginal delivery. The continuous infusion EDA gave satisfactory pain relief in 93.3% of the parturients in group A and 97.8% in group B. The duration of second stage was the same in both groups. There were more persistent malrotations of the fetal head in group A, but the malrotation did not affect the mode of delivery. The rate of instrumental vaginal delivery was 25.5% in both groups. The main cause of operative intervention was delay in the second stage. When the continuous infusion technique is used, it seems unreasonable to discontinue the EDA and thereby deprive the parturient of analgesia during the second stage.     

Low concentration Ropivacaine in labor epidural analgesia. A prospective study on obstetric and neonatal outcome]

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia effectively alleviates labor pain. However controversy exists about the effect of epidural analgesia on labor outcome. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a low concentration local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.08%) in labor epidural analgesia (LEA) on labor pain relief, on the incidence of cesarean sections and instrumental vaginal deliveries, and on neonatal outcome. METHODS: In the period April 1998 - July 2000, 323 women in active labor with live, singleton and in vertex presentation fetuses at term of gestation were included in this prospective study. Women with pre-gestational and/or obstetric diseases or previous caesarean deliveries were excluded. One-hundred and five patients requiring - by written informed consent - LEA were allocated to receive standardised protocol of a low concentration local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.08%) coadministered with opioid (sufentanil): ropivacaine group. The remaining 239 parturients who didn't require LEA were included in the control group. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar; 12 (10.4%) patients receiving LEA delivered by cesarean section, 17 (14.8%) by vacuum extractor whereas 86 (74.8%) had a spontaneous delivery. The risk of cesarean section (adjusted for age, BMI, parity, neonatal weight and gynecologist) resulted lower, even if not significantly, in the ropivacaine group (OR 0.9; 95% IC: 0.6-1.3), while a significant increased instrumental vaginal delivery rate has been reported, although little numbers reduce statistical significance. Neonatal outcome was unaffected by the use of LEA. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion is drawn that a lower concentration of ropivacaine (0.08%) in LEA produces good labor pain relief with no detectable adverse effects on mother and neonate, and without significantly increasing cesarean section rate.     

Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean section and forceps delivery rates

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of introducing epidural analgesia for labor pain relief on the primary cesarean and forceps delivery rates. STUDY DESIGN: The control group consisted of 1,720 women who delivered on a charity hospital service between September 1, 1992, and August 31, 1993; epidural analgesia was not available for this cohort of patients. The study group consisted of 1,442 patients who delivered on the same service between September 1, 1993, and August 31, 1994; elective epidural analgesia for labor pain relief was available for this cohort of patients. A computerized obstetric database was analyzed to compare the two groups regarding demographics, parity, pregnancy complications, labor characteristics, type of delivery, low birth weight incidence and five-minute Apgar scores. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to demographics and pregnancy complications. No control group patient received epidural analgesia for labor pain relief; 734 of 1,285 (57%) laboring patients in the study group elected epidural analgesia for pain relief. The primary cesarean delivery rate for the control group was 9.6% and for the study group 11.0% (not statistically significant). The control group had 34 (2.0%) forceps deliveries and the study group, 88 (6.1%), for a statistically significant difference. There were significantly more vaginal births after cesarean in the study group (42 vs. 26). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was not associated with an increase in the primary cesarean delivery rate but was associated with an increase in the operative vaginal delivery rate.     

NO FREE LUNCH ON LABOR DAY: The Risks and Benefits of Epidural Analgesia During Labor*

Epidural analgesia provides effective pain relief for women during labor. However, like all medical interventions, it also has potential side effects such as longer labor and a higher rate of intrapartum fever and operative vaginal delivery. A recent meta-analysis of randomized studies by Halpern et al concluded there was no association between epidural use and cesarean delivery. A critique of that meta-analysis, included in this paper, concludes that there are currently insufficient data to determine whether epidural analgesia leads to increased rates of cesarean delivery. This paper also presents results from several recent studies related to epidural analgesia conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. One study demonstrates a significant influence of prenatal planning on use of epidural during labor. Additional studies examine the strong association of epidural analgesia with intrapartum fever and the consequences of that fever for mother and infant. Epidural analgesia should remain an option available to women during labor. A more complete understanding of the risks and benefits that accompany its use is essential so that women and their care providers can make informed choices about pain relief during labor. J Nurse Midwifery 1999;44:394–8 © 1999 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.     

Impact of labor induction,gestational age,and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of labor induction and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous and multiparous women between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 14,409 women delivering at two teaching hospitals in metropolitan Boston during 1998 and 1999. Women who had contraindications to labor, including a prior cesarean delivery, were excluded. The risks for cesarean delivery by induction status, gestational age by completed week between 36 and 42 weeks, maternal age <35, 35-39, and >/=40 years, and stratified by parity, were calculated by logistic regression. RESULTS: In nulliparas, labor induction was associated with an increase in cesarean delivery from 13.7% to 24.7% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48, 1.95]). In multiparas, induction was associated with an increase from 2.4% to 4.5% (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10, 2.00). Other variables that placed a nulliparous woman at increased risk for cesarean delivery included maternal age of at least 35 years and gestational ages over 40 weeks. For multiparas, only maternal age 40 years or older and gestational age of 41 weeks were associated with an increase in cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor, older maternal age, and gestational age over 40 weeks each independently increase the risk for cesarean delivery in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Although the relative risk from induction is similar in nulliparas and multiparas, the absolute magnitude of the increase is much greater in nulliparas (11% versus 2.1%).     

No free lunch on labor day. The risks and benefits of epidural analgesia during labor.

Epidural analgesia provides effective pain relief for women during labor. However, like all medical interventions, it also has potential side effects such as longer labor and a higher rate of intrapartum fever and operative vaginal delivery. A recent meta-analysis of randomized studies by Halpern et al concluded there was no association between epidural use and cesarean delivery. A critique of that meta-analysis, included in this paper, concludes that there are currently insufficient data to determine whether epidural analgesia leads to increased rates of cesarean delivery. This paper also presents results from several recent studies related to epidural analgesia conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. One study demonstrates a significant influence of prenatal planning on use of epidural during labor. Additional studies examine the strong association of epidural analgesia with intrapartum fever and the consequences of that fever for mother and infant. Epidural analgesia should remain an option available to women during labor. A more complete understanding of the risks and benefits that accompany its use is essential so that women and their care providers can make informed choices about pain relief during labor.     

Does pain relief during delivery decrease the risk of postnatal depression?

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that sufficient pain relief during delivery decreases the risk of postnatal depression. METHODS: As part of a prospective follow-up study of the risk factors for postnatal depression and its impact on the mother-infant interaction and child development, 185 parturients filled in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), first during the first postpartum week and again (n = 162) 4 months later. The incidence and the risk of high EPDS scores was calculated according to the mode of delivery and the mode of pain relief during vaginal delivery, also after adjusting for the length of labor. RESULTS: Mothers who received epidural/paracervical blockade during their delivery spent less time in the delivery room than mothers in the nitrous oxide/acupuncture group (p = 0.033) or mothers with no pain relief (p = 0.026) and had shorter length of labor than mothers without pain relief (p = 0.04). The adjusted risk of depressive scores at the first postnatal week was decreased in the epidural/paracervical group when compared with no analgesia group (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.72). This difference was not shown at 4 months postpartum. Elective or emergency cesarean section did not increase the risk of high EPDS scores at the first week or at 4 months postpartum. CONCLUSION: The mode of pain relief during vaginal delivery seems to be associated with the incidence of postpartum depression, especially immediately after delivery.     

Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean rate

There is some concern that providing parturients with epidural analgesia increases the likelihood of cesarean delivery. Because of the widespread interest in cesarean rates and the expanding use of epidural analgesia, we believed that this contention should be assessed. Hospital records were reviewed to determine the primary cesarean rate for 1084 parturients who delivered at our institution during 15 months in which there was a 24-hour "on demand" epidural service. This was compared with our primary cesarean rate during 15 months in which epidural analgesia was not available, even on physician request. Because of the characteristics of our institution, this control group consisted of patients from the same population base managed by the same eight obstetricians using the same management techniques. For patients in labor, the primary cesarean rate overall was 9.0% before and 8.2% after the epidural service began (P = .626). When subpopulations based on parity and indication for cesarean delivery were studied, there were no significant changes in the cesarean rate. These results demonstrate that the availability of on-demand epidural analgesia for patients in labor did not increase the primary cesarean rate, either in the aggregate or for any of the subpopulations studied.     

Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the relationship between epidural analgesia and cesarean and instrumental vaginal delivery rates. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of the first 1000 nulliparous pregnancies in women with a cephalic presentation in spontaneous labor at term in each of 3 different years, over which the epidural rate increased from 10% to 57%. RESULTS: Cesarean and instrumental vaginal delivery rates were similar in all 3 years. Demographic characteristics remained unchanged or altered in a manner that has previously been associated with an increase in intervention. Electronic fetal monitoring and first-stage oxytocin use remained unchanged, but oxytocin use in the second stage increased considerably. CONCLUSIONS: Increased use of epidural analgesia had no effect on cesarean delivery rates. Although randomized trials have suggested that it increases instrumental vaginal delivery rates, this might be overcome by active management of labor or judicious use of oxytocin in the second stage.     

Prediction of dystocia-related cesarean section risk in uncomplicated Taiwanese nulliparas at term

Purpose

We aimed to assess risk factors for dystocia-related cesarean section (CS) in uncomplicated Taiwanese nulliparas at term

Methods

We reviewed 1,272 deliveries by 1 obstetrician in a Taiwanese hospital between February 2004 and December 2011. These parturients were nulliparas with singleton pregnancies ≥37 weeks gestation who had liveborn cephalic deliveries. The CS group consisted of parturients with dystocia-related CS for the following indications: prolonged latent phase, failure to progress, or arrest of descent. Eight confounding variables [maternal age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) in labor, gestational age, infant birth weight, gender, and cervical dilatation] were obtained from the medical records. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between each variable and route of delivery. A predictive formula for CS probability was generated using a logistic regression model.

Results

Overall 15.0 % of nulliparas in our population underwent CS. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between maternal BMI and CS (adjusted OR 1.112; 95 % CI 1.065–1.161; P < 0.001). The association between maternal age and CS was also statistically significant (adjusted OR 1.074, 95 % CI 1.033–1.116, P = 0.001). Maternal height, weight in labor, gestational age, infant birth weight, gender, and cervical dilatation were not significantly associated with the route of delivery. A predictive formula for CS probability was developed based on a combination of maternal BMI and age.

Conclusions

Our results show that maternal age and BMI in labor are significantly associated with dystocia-related CS in uncomplicated Taiwanese nulliparas at term. We develop a practical formula to predict the probability for CS. Using this formula, obstetricians can estimate the risk of CS according to maternal age and BMI in labor.     

阴道分娩镇痛相关热点问题

分娩镇痛总体上分为非药物性和药物性镇痛方法。前者以拉玛泽呼吸镇痛法、导乐陪伴分娩等为主,后者主要是镇痛效果切实可靠的椎管内阻滞镇痛。文章就镇痛对剖宫产率、助产率、胎心率及母体发热的影响等热点问题进行了论述,也阐述了潜伏期镇痛和静脉镇痛的可行性。     

Obstetric pain relief and its association with remembrance of labor pain at two months and one year after birth

The association between obstetric pain relief and long-term memory of pain is poorly researched in spite of the fact that a woman's memory of childbirth may affect her emotional wellbeing and future reproduction. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between epidural analgesia and other forms of pain relief, and memory of pain at two months and one year after birth. A national sample of 2482 Swedish speaking women with vaginal delivery or emergency cesarean section preceded by labor were followed from early pregnancy to one year after birth. Data were collected by three postal questionnaires: in early pregnancy, and two months and one year after the birth. Recollection of intense pain at two months and one year was associated with high rates of pain relief, and this was most obvious regarding epidural analgesia in first-time mothers. When comparing women with the same pain score at two months postpartum who had and who did not have an epidural, the first group seemed to have greater difficulty forgetting pain 10 months later. Possible explanations of these findings are discussed.     

Obstetric pain relief and its association with remembrance of labor pain at two months and one year after birth

The association between obstetric pain relief and long-term memory of pain is poorly researched in spite of the fact that a woman's memory of childbirth may affect her emotional wellbeing and future reproduction. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between epidural analgesia and other forms of pain relief, and memory of pain at two months and one year after birth. A national sample of 2482 Swedish speaking women with vaginal delivery or emergency cesarean section preceded by labor were followed from early pregnancy to one year after birth. Data were collected by three postal questionnaires: in early pregnancy, and two months and one year after the birth. Recollection of intense pain at two months and one year was associated with high rates of pain relief, and this was most obvious regarding epidural analgesia in first-time mothers. When comparing women with the same pain score at two months postpartum who had and who did not have an epidural, the first group seemed to have greater difficulty forgetting pain 10 months later. Possible explanations of these findings are discussed.     

The study of maternal and fetal plasma catecholamines levels during pregnancy and delivery.

BACKGROUND: To study maternal and fetal plasma levels of catecholamines (CA) during pregnancy and delivery, especially changes in CA levels during fetal distress and conditions of different modes of delivery. METHODS: Maternal and fetal plasma NE, E and DA levels were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for 16 non-pregnant women, 19 cases of early pregnancy, 17 cases of mid pregnancy, late pregnancy, spontaneous vaginal delivery and 53 cases of cesarean section. RESULTS: Plasma NE and DA levels decreased gradually with the advance of gestational weeks, and levels of plasma NE were significantly lower than those of non-pregnant women (P < 0.05). The levels of plasma CA in patients who had elective cesarean section were significantly lower than those who had vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section (P < 0.01). However, CA levels of the cord artery in the vaginal delivery group were significantly higher than those in the cesarean section group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery is better than cesarean section for the newborn. If cesarean section is necessary, it is best for the newborn after onset of labor.     

腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉用于分娩镇痛的临床分析

目的探讨蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉（CSEA）进行分娩镇痛对母儿的影响。方法将200例（试验组）无产科并发症和麻醉禁忌证的初产妇分为自然临产组120例，缩宫素引产组80例；随机抽取同期条件相当，未实施分娩镇痛者200例也分别与镇痛组配为对照组，试验组在活跃初期使用小剂量低浓度麻醉药经蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外联合给药，观察用药后不良反应和镇痛效果以及对产程时间、分娩方式、产后出血、新生儿窒息、羊水性状的影响，并与200例对照组产妇相比较。结果试验组镇痛效果良好，未见明显不良反应，活跃期和第二产程缩短，此镇痛方式快速有效，不良反应少，能使活跃期明显加速，第二产程缩短；两组在产后出血、新生儿窒息、胎儿窘迫等方面差异无显著性。结论此镇痛方式快速有效，不良反应少，能使活跃期明显加速，缩短第二产程，降低剖宫产率，对母婴无不良影响，值得推广。     

Is the management of epidural analgesia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the association of cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia management, specifically with the timing of epidural catheter placement in relation to labor, the type of epidural analgesia, and the use of bolus dosing.Study Design: A retrospective cohort design was used to investigate 1561 consecutive nulliparous parturients whose labor occurred between November 1, 1996, and June 30, 1997, at Northwestern Memorial Hospital and who were delivered of term, singleton neonates in a cephalic presentation. The relationship between the management of epidural analgesia and the risk for cesarean delivery was determined with stepwise logistic regression to control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: There was a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery associated with decrements in cervical effacement (P =.001), cervical dilatation (P =.001), and fetal station (P =.001) at the time of epidural catheter placement. An increasing number of epidural boluses during the first stage of labor was also associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery (P =.001). After we controlled for maternal age, maternal body mass index, gestational age, infant birth weight, induction of labor, use of magnesium sulfate, and presence of chorioamnionitis, the adjusted odds of cesarean delivery associated with fetal station (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.7) and epidural boluses (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.8) during the first stage of labor remained significant. CONCLUSION: The management of epidural analgesia during labor was associated with the potential for increased risk of cesarean delivery. This risk increased with higher stations of the fetal head at the time of epidural catheter placement and with more frequent epidural boluses of local anesthetic during the first stage of labor.     

Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: a quantitative review

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to quantitatively summarize previous literature on the effects of epidural analgesia in labor on the duration of labor and mode of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Original studies published in English from 1965 through December 1997 were reviewed and assigned a quality score independently by 2 of the authors. Studies that met the minimal requirements were evaluated further. Data syntheses were performed separately according to study design and outcome measurements, including cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, oxytocin augmentation, and durations of the first and second stages of labor. RESULTS: Seven randomized clinical trials and 5 observational studies met the minimal requirements. Among them 4 studies of each sort were included in the data synthesis. Both types of studies showed that epidural analgesia increased risk of oxytocin augmentation 2-fold. Clinical trials suggested that epidural analgesia did not increase the risk of cesarean delivery either overall or for dystocia, nor did it significantly increase the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery; however, observational studies reported a more than 4-fold increased risk of cesarean and instrumental deliveries. Although most studies showed a longer labor among women with epidural analgesia than without it, especially during the second stage, most of the studies used inappropriate statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia with low-dose bupivacaine may increase the risk of oxytocin augmentation but not that of cesarean delivery.     

Epidural analgesia and fetal head malposition at vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE: To determine if nulliparas who delivered with on-demand epidural analgesia are more likely to have malpositioning of the fetal vertex at delivery than women delivered during a period of restricted epidural use. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of nulliparous women with spontaneous labor delivered during a 12-month period immediately before the availability of on-demand labor epidural analgesia was compared with a similar group of nulliparas delivered after labor epidural analgesia was available on request. The primary outcome variable was a non-occiput anterior position or malpositioned fetal head at vaginal delivery. RESULTS: The frequency of epidural use increased from 0.9% before epidural analgesia became available on demand to 82.9% afterward. Fetal head malpositioning at vaginal delivery occurred in 26 of 434 (6.0%) women delivered in the before period compared with 29 of 511 (5.7%) in the after period (relative risk 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.6, 1.6). No statistically significant difference in the incidence of fetal head malpositioning was present after patients were stratified by mode of delivery (Mantel-Haenszel weighted relative risk 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.6, 1.4). The study sample size provided 85% power to detect a two-fold increase in the incidence of fetal malpositioning from a baseline rate of 6% associated with on-demand epidural use. CONCLUSION: Providing on-request labor epidural analgesia to nulliparas in spontaneous labor did not result in a clinically significant increase in the frequency of fetal head malpositioning at vaginal delivery.     

Fear during labor

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to compare primiparous and multiparous women's experiences of fear of delivery during an early stage of active labor (cervix dilatation 3-5 centimeters) and to study whether fear of delivery, measured during the early stage of active labor, was a predictor of the amount of pain relief received during the remaining part of labor (cervix dilatation 5 cm - partus), of the duration of the remaining part of labor, and of the occurrence of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section. METHOD: Thirty-five primiparous and 39 multiparous women answered the Delivery Fear Scale (DFS) once during the early stage of labor and before they had received any pain relief. RESULTS: Primiparous women reported higher levels of fear than multiparous women did. Fear during the first phase of labor predicted only the total amount of pain relief received during labor. CONCLUSION: The clinical implications of the study are that the delivery staff should consider women's fear during labor and pay attention especially to primiparous women's increased risk of higher levels of fear during an early stage of active labor, as compared with multiparous women's. The challenge for staff of a delivery ward is to support the woman in labor in a way that decreases fear, which in turn might reduce the woman's need of pain relief.     

Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment

OBJECTIVE: More than 50% of pregnant women in the United States are using epidural analgesia for labor pain. However, whether epidural analgesia prolongs labor and increases the risk of cesarean delivery remains controversial. STUDY DESIGN: We examined this question in a community-based, tertiary military medical center where the rate of continuous epidural analgesia in labor increased from 1% to 84% in a 1-year period while other conditions remained unchanged-a natural experiment. We systematically selected 507 and 581 singleton, nulliparous, term pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labor and vertex presentation from the respective times before and after the times that epidural analgesia was available on request during labor. We compared duration of labor, rate of cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, and oxytocin use between these two groups. RESULTS: Despite a rapid and dramatic increase in epidural analgesia during labor (from 1% to 84% in 1 year), rates of cesarean delivery overall and for dystocia remained the same (for overall cesarean delivery: adjusted relative risk, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.2; for dystocia: adjusted relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6). Overall instrumental delivery did not increase (adjusted relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4), nor did the duration of the first stage and the active phase of labor (multivariate analysis; P >.1). However, the second stage of labor was significantly longer by about 25 minutes (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia during labor does not increase the risk of cesarean delivery, nor does it necessarily increase oxytocin use or instrumental delivery caused by dystocia. The duration of the active phase of labor appears unchanged, but the second stage of labor is likely prolonged. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:128-34).