Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique

Introduction

Surgical repair of the tympanic membrane, termed a type one tympanoplasty is a tried and tested treatment modality. Overlay or underlay technique of tympanoplasty is common. Sandwich tympanoplasty is the combined overlay and underlay grafting of tympanic membrane.

Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique

The use of cartilage as a grafting material has been advocated in cases at high risk for failure, such as subtotal perforations, adhesive processes, tympanosclerosis and residual defects after primary tympanoplasties. The cartilage palisade technique, in which the TM is fully reconstructed with palisade-shaped cartilage pieces, was first described by Heermann. Cartilage material has been critized because of concerns regarding hearing results, however, large cartilage plates with thicknesses ≤0.5 mm have been suggested as an acceptable comprise and the graft take of this technique has been reported to be excellent. The purpose of this study was to compare the graft take rates and hearing results of primary type I cartilage tympanoplasty operations with palisade technique with those of primary tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia in a homogenous group of patients. Study design: retrospective chart review. Setting: tertiary medical center. The study population included 51 patients who were operated between January 2000 and 2006 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. Primary tympanoplasty cases with pure subtotal perforations (perforation >50% of the whole TM area), intact ossicular chain, at least more than 1 month dry period and normal middle ear mucosa were included in the study. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty group included 23 cases, whereas 28 patients were were in the fascia group. Intervention: therapeutic. Graft take rates were noted in 51 patients and pre- and post operative audiograms were compared using the chi-square test with Yates’ continuity correction, Fisher’s exact test, t test and repeated measures ANOVA. Graft take was achieved in 22 patients (95.7%) in palisade cartilage group and in 21 patients (75%) in temporalis fascia group (P = 0.059). Mean speech reception treshold, air–bone gap and pure-tone average scores comparing the gain between both techniques showed no significant changes in the threshold (P > 0.05). However the functional success was achieved with the palisade cartilage technique postoperatively, regarding to mean air–bone gap and speech reception threshold changes. Our experience with palisade cartilage technique demonstrates that subtotal or total perforations at high risk for graft failure, can be treated efficiently and a durable and resistant reconstruction of the TM with reasonable hearing can be achieved. The study was presented as a poster at the Fifth Balkan Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Edirne, Turkey, 7–10 September 2006.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty

Objective

To assess the efficacy of butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and compare it with conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty in terms of success rate and hearing outcomes.

Comparison of cartilage graft and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis

Conclusions: Tympanoplasty using cartilage grafts has a better graft take rate than that using temporalis fascia grafts. There are no significant differences between cartilage grafts and temporalis fascia grafts for hearing outcomes. Contrary to the sliced cartilage sub-group, full-thickness cartilage grafts generate better hearing outcomes than temporalis fascia grafts.

Objective: Tympanic membrane perforation can cause middle ear relapsing infection and lead to hearing damage. Various techniques have been applied in order to reconstruct the tympanic membrane. Recently, cartilage grafts and temporalis fascia grafts have been widely used for tympanic membrane closure. A systemic review and meta-analysis was carried out based on published retrospective trials that investigated the efficacy of cartilage grafts and temporalis fascia grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty. Both graft take rates and mean AIR-BONE-GAP gains were analyzed.

Methods: Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were systematically searched. After a scientific investigation, we extracted the relevant data following our selection criteria. Odds ratio (OR) of graft take rates and mean difference (MD) of AIR-BONE-GAP gains were calculated within 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Eight eligible articles with 915 patients were reviewed. The pooled OR for graft take rate was 3.11 (95% CI =1.94–5.00; p =?0.43) and the difference between the two groups was significant, which means that the cartilage grafts group got a better graft take rate than the temporalis fascia grafts group. The pooled MD for mean AIR-BONE-GAP gain was 1.92 (95% CI?= ?0.12–3.95; p?p?=?0.14) and the difference was significant, which means that the full thickness cartilage grafts sub-group got a better hearing outcome than the temporalis fascia grafts group. On the contrary, the pooled MD of sliced cartilage grafts sub-group was 0.12 (95% CI?=??0.44–0.69; p?=?0.61) and there was no significant difference between the sliced cartilage grafts and temporalis fascia group.     

Comparison of temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty in elderly patients

Objective

To investigate the success rates and hearing outcomes of temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage grafts used for type-1 tympanoplasty in the elderly (³65 years)

Comparison of diced cartilage graft wrapped in surgicell and diced cartilage graft wrapped in fascia: an experimental study

HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to compare diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia and diced cartilage grafts wrapped in surgicell with respect to their resorption. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Eight male Wistar Albino rats were used. After general anesthesia, two different subcutaneous pockets (upper and lower pocket) were prepared in the rat's abdomen. Surgicell-wrapped homograft that was taken from the ear was placed into the upper subcutaneous pocket. Fascia-wrapped homograft which was taken from the ear was placed into the lower subcutaneous pocket. All the rats were killed at the end of 2 months, and the samples were collected to be examined histopathologically. Cartilage mass, foreign body reaction, fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and vascularization were researched. RESULTS: Diced cartilage wrapped surgicell stained negative for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Diced cartilage wrapped in fascia stained positive for GFAP. There was a significant difference between two groups with respect to fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and cartilage mass. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding vascularization. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that diced cartilage graft wrapped in surgicell was absorbed, whereas diced cartilage graft wrapped in fascia was not.     

Long-term results of type I tympanoplasty with perichondrium reinforced cartilage palisade vs temporalis fascia for large perforations: A retrospective study

Objective:To compare the rate of graft uptake and postoperative hearing outcomes of Type I tympanoplasty with perichondrium reinforced cartilage palisade to temporalis fascia for large tympanic membrane(TM)perforations over 5 years follow-up period.Materials and methods:This was a retrospective comparative study involving patients with chronic otitis media with large TM perforations.The patients underwent type I tympanoplasty using either perichondrium reinforced cartilage palisade(CP group)or temporalis fascia(TF group)as the graft via a transmeatal approach and under local anesthesia.Morphological and functional results were recorded at three-and five years follow-up.Demographic profiles including age and sex,surgery side,contralateral disease and graft uptake rate,as well as hearing outcomes,were compared between the two groups.Results:At three years follow-up,graft uptake was 94.87%for perichondrium reinforced cartilage palisade and 80.7%for fascia,respectively,(p?0.67).At five years follow-up,the uptake rate dropped to 87.17%in the CP group,but to 66.6%in the TF group(p?0.019).Hearing improved after surgery in both groups,and showed no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion:Over long-term,perichondrium reinforced palisade showed a statistically significant better outcome regarding graft uptake than temporalis fascia in type Itympanoplasty for large TM perforations with comparable audiometric results.     

Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage

ObjectivesTo compare the results obtained with canal wall up (CWU) tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma using cartilage or an hydroxyapatite (HA) PORP positioned on the head of the stapes and to analyse the impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane with cartilage.Materials and methodsRetrospective study of 128 cases (99 adults, 29 children) operated between 2003 and 2012 for cholesteatoma by CWU tympanoplasty with use of a cartilage graft (90 cases) or a PORP (38 cases) on the head of the stapes. Audiometric results were analysed according to the International Bureau for Audiophonology (BIAP) criteria and were submitted to statistical analysis. All ossiculoplasties were performed during the first operation and only 39% of patients required surgical revision. The malleus was preserved in 79 cases and sacrificed in 49 cases.ResultsWith a follow-up of 2 years, the residual mean air-bone gap was 16.8 dB in the cartilage group (gain of 7.6 dB; P = 0.001) and 15.8 dB in the PORP group (gain of 8.5 dB; P = 0.002). The air-bone gap was less than 20 dB in 67.6% of cases in the cartilage group and 70.4% of cases in the PORP group. No significant difference was observed between the 2 techniques and no significant difference was observed according to whether or not the malleus was preserved in either the cartilage group or the PORP group.ConclusionThese results confirm the value of cartilage graft placed on the head of the stapes as ossiculoplasty technique in cholesteatoma operated by CWU tympanoplasty, giving comparable results to those obtained with a PORP. Malleus removal did not induce any reduction of the quality of hearing obtained. Total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane with cartilage appeared to decrease the cholesteatoma recurrence rate (8.5%).     

Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia

Our objective is to compare hearing and graft take results of temporal muscle fascia tympanoplasty and cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty. Seventy seven patients are classified into two groups: Group 1 included 37 patients for whom cartilage graft, harvested from symba concha, is used as reinforcement under temporalis muscle fascia anteriorly and Group 2 included 40 patients for whom only temporalis muscle fascia is used in type 1 tympanoplasty. A pure-tone audiometry is done within 1 week prior to surgery and at 6 months postoperatively. There is statistically significant difference between postoperative graft take results among groups. In both groups postoperative anterior TM perforation is encountered most commonly. Success rate of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty in revision patients is 100% but temporal muscle fascia tympanoplasty’s is 66%. There is no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative air conduction gain of TM intact patients. The results indicated that Cartilage reinforcement myringoplasty technique under anterior of the temporal muscle fascia significantly increases the graft take ratios in high-risk perforations and it also does not affect hearing levels. Therefore, the authors suggest usage of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty technique under anterior of the temporal muscle fascia which is an easy and applicable technique to increase graft take ratios, particularly in patients with preoperative anterior and subtotal TM perforations.     

Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and tragal cartilage perichondrium in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty with limited elevation of tympanomeatal flap

IntroductionElevation of tympanomeatal flap is one of the basic steps of tympanoplasty. A satisfactory level of anatomic and functional success can be achieved by using different grafts with limited tympanomeatal flap elevation.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare the anatomic and functional success of tragal cartilage perichondrium and temporal muscle fascia in cases of endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty performed with limited tympanomeatal flap elevation.MethodsIn total, 81 cases (33 females, 48 males, mean age 22.1 ± 10.1 years, interval 18–49 years) which underwent transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty with limited elevation of tympanomeatal flap were included the present study. All cases were divided into two groups as tragal cartilage perichondrium (group A) and temporal muscle fascia (group B). The comparison of the groups were made considering the pre- and postoperative air-bone gap and the tympanic membrane status.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between Group A and Group B in preoperative and in postoperative air-bone gap values (p = 0.608 and 0.529, respectively). In Group A and B, postoperative air-bone gap values demonstrated significant decrease compared to the preoperative values (p = 0.0001). Group A and group B did not demonstrate significant differences between postoperative improvements of air-bone gap values (p = 0.687). Graft retention success was 92.6% in group A while it was 90.0% in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of graft retention success (p = 0.166).ConclusionIn accordance with the results of this study, we believe that both tragal cartilage perichondrium and temporal muscle fascia, and also in limited tympanomeatal flap elevation in endoscopic tympanoplasty are all eligible for result in safe and successful surgery.     

Surgical treatment of laryngeal tumors with subglottic extension and tracheal tumors with composite nasal septal cartilage graft: technique and outcome

OBJECTIVE: Composite nasal septal cartilage grafts (CNSCG) are effective grafting materials in laryngeal and tracheal reconstruction following tumor resection. METHODS: Between 1985 and 2005, we used CNSCG for the reconstruction of defects following resection of laryngeal tumors with subglottic extension (20 cases), subglottic mesenchymal tumors (2 cases), invasive thyroid carcinoma (4 cases), tracheal tumors (3 cases) and esophagus carcinoma with tracheal invasion (1 case) in total of 30 patients. RESULTS: The patients with subglottic tumors were decanulated within 5-7 days except one case. We achieved satisfactory voice and swallowing without any sign of recurrence. Overall complications consisted of subglottic stenosis in one case, and unilateral paralysis of recurrent laryngeal nerve in two cases. One patient with subglottic laryngeal carcinoma died due to neck and distant metastases 4 years after the operation. All patients are well with a mean follow-up period 9 years. Three patients with tracheal tumors underwent lateral resection and reconstructed with CNSCG. Satisfactory healing of the grafts was seen in all cases without local recurrence or complication with a mean follow-up period of 62 months. One of the patients had distant metastases 3 years after the operation. The patient with esophagus carcinoma and tracheal invasion was treated by total esophagectomy, gastric pull-up, tracheal resection and CNSCG reconstruction. He died at postoperative 5th day due to mediastinitis as a complication of gastric pull-up. CONCLUSION: Free composite cartilage graft is a reliable material in the reconstruction of defects after surgery of laryngeal tumors with subglottic extension, invasive thyroid and esophagus tumors and well-selected tracheal tumors.     

Comparison of long-term functional results between standard supracricoid laryngectomy and modified technique with sternohyoid muscle

IntroductionLaryngeal cancer is the most common cancer of the upper respiratory tract. The main methods of treatment included surgery (partial laryngectomy and total laryngectomy) and radiation therapy. Laryngeal dysfunction is seen after both treatment modalities.ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare postoperative functional results of the standard supracricoid partial laryngectomy technique and a modified supracricoid partial laryngectomy technique using the sternohyoid muscle.MethodsIn total, 29 male patients (average years 58.20 ± 9.00 years; range 41–79 years) with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent supra cricoid partial laryngectomy were included. The patients were divided into two groups in terms of the surgical techniques. In Group A, all patients underwent standard supracricoid partial laryngectomy technique between January 2007 and November 2011. In Group B, all patients underwent modified supracricoid partial laryngectomy between August 2010 and November 2011. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing test, short version of the voice handicap index scores, and the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory, the time of oral feeding and the decanulation of the patients after surgery of each groups were compared.ResultsThe mean maximum phonation time was 8.68 ± 4.21 s in Group A and 15.24 ± 6.16 s in Group B (p > 0.05). The S/Z (s/s) ratio was 1.23 ± 0.35 in Group A and 1.08 ± 0.26 in Group B (p > 0.05); the voice handicap index averages were 9.86 ± 4.77 in Group A and 12.42 ± 12.54 in Group B (p > 0.05); the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing test averages were calculated as 12.73 ± 3.08 in Group A and 13.64 ± 1.49 in Group B (p > 0.05). In the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory, evaluation of swallowing, the emotional, physical, and functional scores were 29.21 ± 4.11, 32.21 ± 6.85, and 20.14 ± 2.17 in the Group B, and 29.20 ± 2.54, 32.4 ± 4.79, and 19 ± 1.92 in Group A, respectively.ConclusionAlthough there is no statistical difference in functional outcome comparisons, if rules are adhered to in preoperative patient selection, modified supracricoid partial laryngectomy can be applied safely and meaningful gains can be achieved in functional outcomes.