Angioscopic differences in neointimal coverage and in persistence of thrombus between sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents after a 6-month implantation.

AIMS: The neointimal coverage and intracoronary thrombi within stented segments at 6 months after implantation between sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) were compared by direct visualization using angioscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients (36 stable angina and 10 acute coronary syndrome) were treated with 33 SESs and 33 BMSs. Immediately after and 6 months after stenting, each of the stented segments, edge body, and overlapping segment were observed by angioscopy and the grade of neointimal coverage over the stents was classified as 0: absent neointima, 1: visible struts through thin neointima, or 2: invisible struts. The existence of thrombi was also evaluated. The average grade of the neointimal coverage at 6 months follow-up was lower in the SES than that in the BMS (edge: 1.4+/-0.7 vs. 1.9+/-0.2, body: 1.0+/-0.5 vs. 1.8+/-0.5, overlapping segment: 0.6+/-0.7 vs. 1.8+/-0.5; P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P=0.0069, respectively). The frequency of persistence of thrombus was significantly higher in the SESs than that in the BMSs (86 vs. 29%, respectively; P=0.031). CONCLUSION: The present study suggested a delayed neointimal stent coverage and slower thrombus disappearance process in the SESs in comparison to the BMSs.     

Comparison of angioscopic findings and three-year cardiac events between sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent in acute myocardial infarction

The safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. We compared long-term neointimal coverage after stent implantation for AMI evaluated by coronary angioscopy and 3-year clinical events between SESs and bare-metal stents (BMSs). Eighty-seven consecutive patients who received SESs or BMSs for AMI were enrolled. At 8 months after AMI coronary angiography with angioscopy was performed. Using angioscopy we evaluated maximum and minimum grades of neointimal coverage using an angioscopic score (0 to 3). We calculated the heterogeneity score as the maximum grade minus the minimum grade. We compared angioscopic parameters including minimum grade and heterogeneity score of neointimal coverage, thrombi and plaque color, serum parameters, and major adverse cardiac events for 3 years between the 2 groups. The restenosis rate of the SES group (n = 56) was significantly lower than that of the BMS group (n = 31, 9% vs 31%, p = 0.015). The SES group had a lower minimum grade of neointimal coverage and higher heterogeneity score and prevalence of thrombi than the BMS group, but from 8 months to 3 years after stent implantation there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events between the 2 groups. In conclusion, a lower minimum grade and greater heterogeneity of neointimal coverage and thrombi were shown for SESs compared to BMSs at 8 months after AMI. However, these findings did not correlate with cardiac events over a period of 3 years in our patients.     

Coronary angioscopic findings 9 months after everolimus-eluting stent implantation compared with sirolimus-eluting stents

ObjectivesWe assessed angioscopic findings after everolimus-eluting stents (EES) implantation, compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).BackgroundCoronary angioscopy (CAS) provides an opportunity to assess neointimal coverage over stent struts, thrombus, and plaque color by direct visualization. CAS is a useful tool for evaluating stent struts after drug-eluting stent implantation. Angioscopic findings after EES implantation have not been reported before.MethodsWe performed CAS in 23 patients who were treated with EES and 41 patients with SES. CAS was performed 8.5 months after stent implantation. We assessed neointimal coverage, thrombus, and plaque color. We classified neointimal coverage in 4 grades: grade 0 = struts were completely exposed; grade 1 = struts were visible with dull light reflexion; grade 2 = there was no light reflexion from slightly visible struts; grade 3 = struts were completely covered.ResultsThere was no significant difference in minimum, maximum, dominant grade of neointimal coverage, and heterogeneity index between EES and SES. Thrombus was less frequently observed in EES than SES (4% vs 29%, p = 0.02). When we divided study patients into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable angina pectoris (SAP), there was a tendency toward less thrombus in EES than SES, in both ACS and SAP. Maximum color grade of the plaques was less advanced in EES than SES (p < 0.01). Yellow plaques of grade 2 or 3 were less frequent in EES than SES (35% vs 76%, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThis study suggested that EES were associated with lower risk of thrombus formation than SES.     

Comparison of neointimal coverage by optical coherence tomography of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent three months after implantation

No detailed data regarding neointimal coverage of bare-metal stents (BMSs) at 3 months after implantation was reported to date. This investigation was designed to evaluate the neointimal coverage of BMSs compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) using optical coherence tomography. A prospective optical coherence tomographic follow-up examination was performed 3 months after stent implantation for patients who underwent BMS (n = 16) or SES implantation (n = 24). Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness on each stent strut and percentage of NIH area in each cross section were measured. Malapposition of stent struts to the vessel wall and the existence of in-stent thrombi were also evaluated. There were 5,076 struts of SESs and 2,875 struts of BMSs identified. NIH thickness and percentage of NIH area in the BMS group were higher than in the SES group (351 +/- 248 vs 31 +/- 39 mum; p <0.0001; 45.0 +/- 14% vs 10.0 +/- 4%; p <0.0001, respectively). The frequency of uncovered struts was higher in the SES group than the BMS group (15% vs 0.1%; p <0.0001). Malapposed struts were observed more frequently in the SES group than the BMS group (15% vs 1.1%; p <0.0001). In conclusion, there was no difference in incidence of in-stent thrombus between the 2 groups (14% vs 0%; p = 0.23). The present study showed almost all BMS struts to be well covered at a 3-month follow-up, suggesting that patients receiving BMS stents may not require dual-antiplatelet therapy >3 months after implantation.     

The wound healing response after implantation of a drug-eluting stent is impaired persistently in the long term

A 70-year-old man underwent stent implantation for right coronary artery (RCA) lesions with a bare metal stent (BMS) and two sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). However, as both the BMS and SES stented sites developed restenosis after 13 months, he underwent target lesion revascularization using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA). On histopathology, the restenosis lesion at the SES-deployed site showed greater inflammation and less re-endothelialization than that at the BMS-deployed site. Three months later, the SES-deployed site developed a second restenosis, in which paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) were implanted (PES-in-SES), while the BMS-deployed site was restenosis free. Five years later, restenosis was absent in these RCA lesions. However, by optical coherence tomography and/or coronary angioscopy, the PES-in-SES site in the RCA showed poor neointimal coverage over the stent struts and yellowish neointima, suggesting lipid-rich neoatheroma formation, whereas at the BMS site appropriate white neointima formation was observed. Drug-eluting stents still have problems of persistent inflammation, inappropriate neointima formation, and neoatherosclerosis. Although we are now in the era of second generation DESs in which better stent performance would be promising, we should remember that we are obliged to continue to follow-up all patients in whom first generation DESs such as SES or PES have been placed.     

Difference in neointimal coverage at chronic stage between bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent evaluated at stent-strut level by optical coherence tomography

Compared with the bare metal stent (BMS), suppression of neointimal growth in the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) reduced restenosis at the cost of more exposed struts that could impose the risk of stent thrombosis. The present study was conducted to analyze neointimal coverage patterns of stents at a strut-level after implantation of BMS or SES with the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT). We enrolled 35 patients and analyzed neointimal coverage of every strut from 41 stents (BMS: n = 8, SES: n = 33) by using OCT at follow-up of the stent implantation. All of the 371 struts from eight BMSs were covered with ≥100 μm of neointima, while 19.8 and 3.5 % of 3,478 struts from 33 SESs were uncovered (neointimal thickness of <10 μm) and malapposed, respectively. The histogram of neointimal thickness showed basically normal distribution in BMS but skewed in SES. No regional difference in neointimal thickness was observed in BMS (proximal, 535.7 ± 25.2 μm; body, 532.4 ± 17.0 μm; distal, 485.8 ± 27.0 μm). In SES, however, the body segment showed thinner neointima [median 40 μm (interquartile range (IQR) 10–90 μm)] than proximal [60 μm (IQR 10–140 μm), p < 0.001] or distal [50 μm (IQR 10–110 μm), p < 0.001] segment, while uncovered and malapposed struts were more frequent in the proximal and body segments. In conclusion, SES, compared with BMS, showed more suppressed neointimal growth with regional variation: neointimal thickness was the least in the body part while the ratio of exposed and malapposed struts was minimal in the distal segment. OCT was useful for a strut-level analysis of neointimal coverage over the whole stent.     

Comparison of the performance of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents by optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy

Overall stent performance should be characterized by geometric luminal gain acquisition, neointimal coverage of the stent struts, and stabilization of the underlying inflammatory neoatheroma. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and bare metal stent (BMS) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy. For 36 stented coronary lesions (BMS, 12 lesions; ZES, 11 lesions; EES, 13 lesions) in 27 patients, we calculated neointimal area and uncovered stent strut rate based on OCT findings at 10 months after stent placement. The grades of neointimal coverage and yellow color, both of which were classified from 0 to 3, were also assessed by coronary angioscopy. The plaque area of the ZES lesions was larger than that of the EES lesions (P < 0.05) but smaller than that of the BMS lesions (P < 0.05). The OCT-based uncovered rate of the ZES lesions was less than that of the EES lesions (P < 0.01), but similar to that of the BMS lesions. The stent coverage grade by angioscopy was higher in the ZES lesions than in the EES lesions (P < 0.05), but similar to the BMS lesions. The yellow grade was less in the ZES lesions than in the EES lesions (P < 0.01), but similar to the BMS lesions. ZES might be better than BMS in terms of neointimal thickening, and better than EES in terms of neointimal coverage as well as prevention of neoatheroma formation. ZES may have superior performance compared with EES.     

Possible role of damaged neoendothelial cells in the genesis of coronary stent thrombus in chronic phase. A dye staining angioscopic study

The mechanism(s) underlying formation of coronary stent thrombus (ST) in chronic phase is yet unclear. Endothelial cells are highly antithrombotic, therefore, it is conceivable that neoendothelial cells (NECs) covering stent struts are damaged and cause ST. This study was performed to examine the role of damaged NECs covering coronary stent struts in the genesis of occlusive or nonocclusive ST in chronic phase.(1) Forty-four patients with acute coronary syndrome (17 females and 27 males) underwent dye-staining coronary angioscopy, using Evans blue which selectively stains damaged endothelial cells, 6 months after bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment. Neointimal coverage was classified into not covered (grade 0), covered by a thin layer (grade 1), and buried under neointima (grade 2) groups. (2) In 7 beagles, the relationships between neointimal thickness and ST were examined 6 months after BMS deployment. (3) The NECs on the struts were stained blue in 4 of 25 patients with grade 2 and in 11 of 20 patients with grade 0/1 (P < 0.05). ST was observed in none of the former and in 5 of the latter (P < 0.05). (4) In beagles, neointimal coverage was grade 0/1 when neointimal thickness was 80.2 ± 40.0 μm, whereas grade 2 when thickness was 184 ± 59.4 μm. ST was observed in 9 of 15 struts with neointimal thickness within 100 μm and in one of 17 struts with thickness over 100 μm (P < 0.05). ST arose from damaged NECs covering the stent struts. NECs may have been damaged due to friction between them and struts due to thin interposed neointima which might have acted as a cushion, resulting in ST.     

Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis with intravascular ultrasound guidance

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) lesions compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES implantation for ostial LAD lesions is currently unknown. METHODS: Sirolimus-eluting stents were implanted in 68 consecutive patients with ostial LAD stenoses. The control group was composed of 77 patients treated with BMS during the preceding two years. In the SES group, for complete lesion coverage, stent positioning was intentionally extended into the distal left main coronary artery (LMCA) in 23 patients (34%) with intermediate LMCA narrowing. RESULTS: Compared with the BMS group, the SES group had more multivessel involvement, received fewer debulking atherectomies, underwent more direct stenting, had a greater number of stents, and had more segments stented. The procedural success rate was 100% in both groups. The six-month angiographic restenosis rate was significantly lower in the SES group than in the BMS group (5.1% vs. 32.3%, p < 0.001). During the one-year follow-up period, neither death nor myocardial infarction occurred in either group, but target lesion revascularization was less frequent in the SES group than in the BMS group (0% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). In the SES group, there were no restenoses in cases with LMCA coverage, compared with three restenoses (7.9%) in cases with precise stent positioning (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in ostial LAD lesions achieved excellent results regarding restenosis and clinical outcomes compared with BMS implantation. This finding may be associated with reduced neointimal hyperplasia and complete lesion coverage.     

采用光学相干断层成像技术评价国产雷帕霉素洗脱支架术内膜覆盖情况

Objective:Confirming complete neointimal coverage after implantation of drug-eluting stent(DES)is clinically important because incomplete stent coverage is maybe responsible for late thrombosis and sudden cardiac death.Optical coherence tomography(OCT)is a high-resolution(≈10 μm)imaging technique capable of detecting a thin layer of neointimal hyperplasia(NIH)inside DES.Helios stent system(KinheIy Bio-tech Co(Shenzhen).Ltd)is a new generation of sirolimus eluting stents.Methods:Motorized optical coherence t...     

Vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients: three-dimensional ultrasound results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS). BACKGROUND: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients. METHODS: Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents. CONCLUSIONS: The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.     

Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES to reduce the risk of restenosis was initially demonstrated in short lesions using stent implantation with routine pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of the E-SIRIUS trial sought to evaluate local arterial responses to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) delivered with a stent implantation technique allowing direct stenting and only selectively applying high-pressure post-dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS was performed immediately after intervention and at 8-month follow-up in 51 patients randomised to either bare-metal stents (BMS; Bx-Velocitytrade mark; N=20) or SES (Cyphertrade mark N=31). Direct stenting was allowed (24%) and post-dilation was performed only selectively (32%). Lumen dimensions, intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling were compared between SES and BMS. Subsequently, results of SES in the E-SIRIUS IVUS substudy (N=31) were compared to those of SES in the IVUS substudy of the SIRIUS trial (N=137). SES in SIRIUS IVUS substudy were delivered with 100% pre-dilatation and 77% post-dilatation. Baseline stent and reference segment measurements were similar between BMS and SES in E-SIRIUS IVUS patients. Using SES there was a 96% reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume within the stented segment (1.8+/-4.9 vs 50.6+/-39.7 mm3, P<0.001) and a significantly larger minimal lumen cross sectional area at 8-month follow-up (4.5+/-1.1 vs 2.3+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001). No vessel remodeling was observed with the use of SES. The applied stent implantation technique resulted in a minimal stent/reference vessel area ratio of 0.75+/-0.17 in E-SIRIUS SES as compared to 0.84+/-0.23 in SIRIUS SES (P=0.046). Mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area at follow-up was 0.1+/-0.2 mm2 in the SES group of E-SIRIUS and 0.5+/-0.8 mm2 in the SES group of SIRIUS (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: An implantation technique of SES which includes direct stenting and minimizes the use of high-pressure post-dilatation results in less optimal stent expansion. However, follow-up results compare very favourable to those of BMS and are characterised by even less intimal hyperplasia than after a more forceful implantation of SES.     

Characterization of plaque prolapse after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients: a three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound outcome study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to evaluate the plaque prolapse (PP) phenomenon after bare-metal (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus using 3-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). BACKGROUND: Plaque prolapse has been observed in up to 22% of patients treated with BMS. Diabetic patients have a larger atherothrombotic burden and may be more prone to have PP. However, the incidence of PP and its clinical impact after DES implantation is unknown. METHODS: Three-dimensional IVUS was performed after intervention and at 9-month follow-up in 168 patients with diabetes (205 lesions) treated with bare BX Velocity stents ((BX Velocity/Sonic, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) (BMS, n = 65), sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis) (SES, n = 69), and paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) (PES, n = 71). Intravascular ultrasound data at the sites of PP were compared with stented segments without PP in each lesion. Outcomes were evaluated at 9- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were 42 sites of PP (BMS = 11, SES = 11, PES = 20, p = NS) in 34 stented segments of 205 (16.6%) lesions. Plaque prolapse was more frequent in the right coronary artery and in chronic total occlusion lesions. Post-procedure PP volume was 1.95 mm3 in BMS, 2.96 mm3 in SES, and 4.53 mm3 in PES. At follow-up, tissue volume increased at PP sites in both BMS and PES, but not after SES. Neointimal proliferation was similar between PP and non-PP sites. Stent thrombosis and restenosis rates were similar between PP and non-PP lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PP after implantation of new generation tubular stents in patients with diabetes remains high. Drug-eluting stent implantation was not associated with increased risk of PP. Plaque prolapse was not associated with stent thrombosis or increased neointimal proliferation.     

Angioscopic Findings after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

In-stent restenosis is the Achilles' heel of standard or bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation, occurring in 10-40% of the patients. Drug-eluting stent (DES) are supposed to inhibit inflammation and neointimal growth and, subsequently, in-stent restenosis. The neointimal proliferation inside the stent is recognized as lumen late loss on angiograms or as an obstruction area (or volume) on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in chronic phase. Coronary angioscopy provides direct visualization of the lumen and is capable of macroscopic pathologic diagnosis of atherosclerotic plaques and intracoronary thrombi. This modality is also able to supply detailed information on stent coverage with neointimal hyperplasia. The neointimal growth inside the stent is evaluated as white neointimal coverage over the stent struts. Angioscopic view inside the DES is quite different from that inside the BMS. In this article, the difference in angioscopic findings between the DES and the BMS is shown.     

光学相干断层成像在冠心病介入治疗中的应用价值

目的应用光学相干断层成像（OCT）技术评价冠状动脉内粥样硬化斑块、血管对置入支架后即刻和中远期的反应。方法20例冠心病患者,有22支血管在完成冠状动脉造影或介入治疗后进行OCT成像。同时获取23个支架OCT成像,在23个支架中有15个为支架术后4～35个月随访,其中7个为雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架,8个为金属裸支架,另外8个为支架置放后即刻成像。结果入选的20例患者均成功进行OCT检查,并获取22支血管和23个支架满意的图像。通过OCT成像清晰地显示8处纤维斑块、3处钙化斑块、9处富含脂质斑块、2处血栓形成、斑块破裂3处及血管壁上夹层、粥样硬化斑块微小裂口和夹层等。7个置入雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架后OCT随访,均未发现有明显再狭窄,支架表面有少量内膜覆盖,部分支架表面没有内膜覆盖,其中1个支架血管出现瘤样扩张、支架与血管壁分离、支架表面没有内膜覆盖,有1个支架没有充分扩张。8个金属裸支架后用OCT随访发现,所有置入金属裸支架后支架表面内膜增殖明显,其中有3个支架因为内膜过度增殖而出现再狭窄,并再次接受介入治疗。8个支架术后即刻OCT检查显示,与血管贴壁均良好、支架扩张充分有3个支架,4个支架充分扩张,但可见到斑块裂片通过支架网眼突入管腔,1个支架支撑杆分布不均,可见支架与血管壁分离,在8个支架中有2个为支架内套叠支架。结论OCT成像技术可清晰显示各种冠状动脉粥样斑块情况,并可用于评价冠状动脉介入治疗的效果。     

Evaluation by optical coherence tomography of neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stent three months after implantation

Confirming complete neointimal coverage after implantation of a drug-eluting stent is clinically important because incomplete stent coverage is responsible for late thrombosis and sudden cardiac death. Optical coherence tomography is a high-resolution (approximately 10 microm) imaging technique capable of detecting a thin layer of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) inside a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and stent malapposition. This investigation evaluated stent exposure and malapposition 3 months after SES implantation using optical coherence tomography in a different clinical presentations, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-ACS. Motorized optical coherence tomographic pullback (1 mm/s) was performed at 3-month follow-up to examine consecutive implanted 31 SESs in 21 lesions in 21 patients (9 with ACS and 12 with non-ACS). NIH thickness inside each strut and percent NIH area in each cross section were measured. In total, 4,516 struts in 567-mm single-stented segments were analyzed. Overall, NIH thickness and percent NIH area were 29 +/- 41 microm and 10 +/- 4%, respectively. Rates of exposed struts and exposed struts with malapposition were 15% and 6%, respectively. These were more frequent in patients with ACS than in those with non-ACS (18% vs 13%, p <0.0001; 8% vs 5%, p <0.005, respectively). In conclusion, neointimal coverage over a SES at 3-month follow-up is incomplete in ACS and non-ACS. Our study suggests that dual antiplatelet therapy might be continued >3 months after SES implantation.     

Evaluation of coronary remodeling after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation by serial three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound

This study evaluates the response of the coronary vessel wall to implantation of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Bx-VELOCITY, by using serial intravascular ultrasound. SESs have a major impact on the inhibition of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. However, changes in the vessel wall and behind stent struts in animal models and humans have not been evaluated after SES implantation. Thirty-four patients who received a SES (n = 24) or a Bx-VELOCITY bare stent (BS) (n = 10) for single de novo coronary lesions and had serial motorized pullback 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound were included. Stent, lumen, and vessel volumes were similar in the 2 groups at baseline. At follow-up, significantly larger lumen and lower neointimal hyperplasia volumes (0.7 vs 33 mm(3), p = 0.001) were seen in the SES group compared with the BS group. There was no significant difference between SES and BS in either the vessel volume (+2.4% vs +0.7%, p = NS) or the plaque behind stent volume change (+3.4% vs +2.5%, p = NS) from after the procedure to late follow-up. The stent edges also showed no significant difference between postprocedural and follow-up measurements, either in patients receiving SESs or BSs. No stented or edge segment required redilatation in the SES group, whereas 2 patients underwent repeat percutaneous coronary angioplasty in the BS group. In the SES group, 1 patient (4%) showed late acquired incomplete stent apposition. Thus, the SES is effective in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia without affecting vessel volume and plaque behind the stent.     

Mytrolimus药物洗脱支架预防支架内再狭窄的实验研究

目的评价新型聚烯烃类高分子化合物涂层携载雷帕霉素衍生物-Mytrolimus(CCI-779)洗脱支架在小型猪冠状动脉模型预防再狭窄的疗效。方法小型猪冠状动脉分别置入裸支架、单纯聚烯烃类高分子化合物涂层支架和Mytrolimus洗脱支架(160μg/18mm)。术后4周重复冠状动脉造影后处死动物,测定3组支架血管段的损伤指数、冠状动脉横截面积、管腔面积、支架上平均内膜厚度、支架间平均内膜厚度、新生内膜面积、面积再狭窄百分比,并作比较。结果裸支架组(置入支架数n=10)、单纯聚烯烃类高分子化合物涂层支架组(n=10)和Mytrolimus洗脱支架组(n=8)3组冠状动脉大小和血管损伤程度基本相同,术后4周,单纯聚烯烃类高分子化合物涂层组与裸支架比较多项参数差异均无统计学意义。Mytrolimus药物洗脱支架组和裸支架组的支架上内膜厚度分别为(0.18±0.08)mm和(0.33±0.25)mm(P<0.05);支架间内膜厚度分别为(0.14±0.05)mm和(0.28±0.23)mm(P<0.05);新生内膜面积分别为(1.09±0.24)mm2和(2.44±1.59)mm2(P<0.05)。上述多项参数在Mytroliums洗脱支架组均显著少于裸支架组。Mytrolimus组新生内膜面积比裸支架组少了55.33%,且Mytrolimus组无一例再狭窄。结论Mytrolimus洗脱支架在置入小型猪冠状动脉4周时可有效抑制内膜增生、预防冠状动脉实验性支架内再狭窄。     

Recent advances in coronary angioscopy

Angioscopy enables macroscopic pathological diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases from the inside. This imaging modality has been intensively directed to characterizing vulnerable coronary plaques. Scoring of plaque color was developed, and based on prospective studies; dark yellow or glistening yellow plaques were proposed as vulnerable ones. Colorimetry apparatus was developed to assess the yellow color of the plaques quantitatively. The effects of lipid-lowering therapies on coronary plaques were confirmed by angioscopy. However, since observation is limited to surface color and morphology, pitfalls of this imaging technology became evident. Dye-staining angioscopy and near-infrared fluorescence angioscopy were developed for molecular imaging, and the latter method was successfully applied to patients. Color fluorescence angioscopy was also established for molecular and chemical basis characterization of vulnerable coronary plaques in both in vitro and in vivo. Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce coronary restenosis significantly, however, late stent thrombosis (LST) occurs, which requires long-term antiplatelet therapy. Angioscopic grading of neointimal coverage of coronary stent struts was established, and it was revealed that neointimal formation is incomplete and prevalence of LST is higher in DES when compared to bare-metal stent. Many new stents were devised and they are now under experimental or clinical investigations to overcome the shortcomings of the stents that have been employed clinically. Endothelial cells are highly anti-thrombotic. Neoendothelial cell damage is considered to be caused by friction between the cells and stent struts due to the thin neointima between them that might act as a cushion. Therefore, development of a DES that causes an appropriate thickness (around 100 μm) of the neointima is a potential option with which to prevent neoendothelial cell damage and consequent LST while preventing restenosis.     

Distribution pattern of neointimal hyperplasia following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation assessed by 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have been shown to reduce intimal hyperplasia (IH) within the stent. Although angiographic studies have suggested focal distribution of IH, these data are limited by its spatial resolution and the minimal amount of IH. Therefore, the exact distribution pattern of SES IH remains unclear. Ninety-six SIRIUS trial patients who underwent SES (51) or bare metal stent (45) implantation and three-dimensional IVUS at 8 months follow-up were enrolled. Neointimal area (stent-lumen area) was obtained at every 0.5-mm interval throughout the stented segment. The length of each stent with IVUS-detectable neointima was determined and divided by the stented length in each case to normalize the data. Even with IVUS, IH was detectable in very limited SES stented segments (median 8% of total stented length) compared to the diffuse nature of IH within BMS with only 5 stented lesions having segments free from IH. In 25% (13 of 51) of patients, no IH was detectable within whole SES stented segments. In conclusion, SES has reduced not only the total amount of IH, but also limited the distribution. These data suggest that local conditions (heterogeneity of biological responses of particular plaques, pharmacokinetics, or their combination) may play a role in IH following SES implantation.