Isthmotectal axons make ectopic synapses in monocular regions of the tectum in developing Xenopus laevis frogs.

During the development of binocular maps in the tectum of Xenopus laevis, axons that relay input from the ipsilateral eye via the nucleus isthmi undergo a prolonged period of shifting connections. This shifting accompanies the dramatic change in eye position that takes place as the laterally placed eyes of the tadpole move dorsofrontally. There is a concomitant expansion of the proportion of tectum that receives contralateral retinotectal input corresponding to the binocular portion of the visual field. Electrophysiological recording demonstrates that ipsilateral units are present in those rostral tectal zones, and anatomical methods show that the isthmotectal axons arborize densely in the rostral region but also extend sparser branches into the caudal zone, which is occupied by contralateral inputs with receptive fields in the monocular zone of the visual field. A mechanism that aligns the ipsilateral and contralateral maps is activity-dependent stabilization of isthmotectal axons that exhibit firing patterns correlated with those of nearby retinotectal axons. In order for activity patterns to function in stabilizing correct connections and promoting the withdrawal of incorrect connections, synaptic communication of some sort is hypothesized to be essential. We have investigated whether isthmotectal axons make morphologically identifiable synapses during development and where such synapses are located. We find evidence for morphologically identifiable synapses in all regions of the tectum, along with many growth cones and structures that are probably immature synapses. As in the adult, the synapses contain round, clear vesicles, have asymmetric specializations, and terminate on structures that appear to be dendrites. In both adult and tadpole, the rarity of serial synapses involving isthmotectal terminals suggests that the interactions between retinotectal and isthmotectal inputs are mediated by postsynaptic dendrites.     

Ultrastructure of the crossed isthmotectal projection in Xenopus frogs

The nucleus isthmi NI of frogs is a relay for input from the eye to the ipsilateral tectum; each NI receives retinotopic input from one tectum and sends retinotopic output to both tecta. The crossed isthmotectal projection in Xenopus displays tremendous plasticity during development. Physiological and anatomical studies have suggested that the location at which a developing isthmotectal axon will terminate is determined by the correlation of its visually evoked activity with the activity of nearby retinotectal terminals. What structures could mediate such communication? We have examined quantitatively the ultrastructural characteristics of crossed isthmotectal axons and synapses in order to determine whether retinotectal axons communicate directly with isthmotectal axons via axo-axonic synapses or whether the communication is indirect, e.g., via common postsynaptic dendrites. Our results support the conclusion that isthmotectal axons interact with retinotec tal axons indirectly and that tectal cell dendrites are the critical site of interaction.     

Relative number of cells projecting from contralateral and ipsilateral nucleus isthmi to loci in the optic tectum is dependent on visuotopic location: horseradish peroxidase study in the leopard frog.

The leopard frog optic tectum is the principal target of the contralateral retina. The retinal terminals form a topographic map of the visual field. The tectum also receives bilateral topographic input from a midbrain structure called nucleus isthmi. In this study we determined the relative strength of n. isthmi projections to different loci in the tectum. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was applied at single superficial tectal locations in a series of leopard frogs. The application sites were distributed across the tectum. Retrogradely filled cells were counted in ipsilateral and contralateral nucleus isthmi. Although all regions of the tectum receive input from both n. isthmi, the relative number of labeled cells in the two n. isthmi is dependent on visuotopic location. Input to the rostromedial tectum representing the visual field ipsilateral to the labeled tectum comes primarily from the contralateral n. isthmi. Input to the caudolateral tectum representing the visual field contralateral to the labeled tectum originates mostly from the ipsilateral n. isthmi. Tectal application sites representing the visual midline had approximately equal numbers of labeled cells in the two n. isthmi. The results are similar at postapplication survival times ranging from 2 to 14 days. Using application of HRP to rostral tectum and application of nuclear yellow to caudal tectum, we show that the anisotropy in isthmi labeling is not due to take up of these labels by isthmotectal fibers passing through the application sites that terminate elsewhere.     

Caudal topographic nucleus isthmi and the rostral nontopographic nucleus isthmi in the turtle, Pseudemys scripta

Isthmotectal projections in turtles were examined by making serial section reconstructions of axonal and dendritic arborizations that were anterogradely or retrogradely filled with HRP. Two prominent tectal-recipient isthmic nuclei--the caudal magnocellular nucleus isthmi (Imc) and the rostral magnocellular nucleus isthmi (Imr)--exhibited strikingly different patterns of organization. Imc cells have flattened, bipolar dendritic fields that cover a few percent of the area of the cell plate constituting the nucleus and they project topographically to the ipsilateral tectum without local axon branches. The topography was examined explicitly at the single-cell level by using cases with two injections at widely separated tectal loci. Each Imc axon terminates as a compact swarm of several thousand boutons placed mainly in the upper central gray and superficial gray layers. One Imc terminal spans less that 1% of the tectal surface. Imr cells, by contrast, have large, sparsely branched dendritic fields overlapped by local axon collaterals while distally, their axons nontopographically innervate not only the deeper layers of the ipsilateral tectum but also ipsilateral Imc. Imr receives a nontopographic tectal input that contrasts with the topographic tectal input to Imc. Previous work on nucleus isthmi emphasized the role of the contralateral isthmotectal projection (which originates from a third isthmic nucleus in turtles) in mediating binocular interactions in the tectum. The present results on the two different but overlapping ipsilateral tecto-isthmo-tectal circuits set up by Imc and Imr are discussed in the light of physiological evidence for selective attention effects and local-global interactions in the tectum.     

Synaptic interrelationships between the optic tectum and the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi in Rana pipiens

The nucleus isthmi is reciprocally connected to the ipsilateral optic tectum. Ablation of the nucleus isthmi compromises visually guided behavior that is mediated by the tectum. In this paper, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry and electron microscopy were used to explore the synaptic interrelationships between the optic tectum and the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi. After localized injections of HRP into the optic tectum, there are retrogradely labeled isthmotectal neurons and orthogradely labeled fibers and terminals in the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi. These terminals contain round. Clear vesicles of medium diameter (40–52 nm). These terminals make synaptic contact with dendrites of nucleus isthmi cells. Almost half of these postsynaptic dendrites are retrogradely labeled, indicating that there are monosynaptic tectoisthmotectal connections. Localized HRP injection into the nucleus isthmi labels terminals primarily in tectal layers B, E, F, and 8. The terminals contain medium-sized clear vesicles and they form synaptic contacts with tectal dendrites. There are no instances of labeled isthmotectal terminals contacting labeled dendrites. Retrogradely labeled tectoisthmal neurons are contacted by unlabeled terminals containing medium-sized and small clear vesicles. Fifty-four percent of the labeled fibers connecting the nucleus isthmi and ipsilateral tectum are myelinated fibers (average diameter approximately 0.6 μm). The remainder are unmyelinated fibers (average diameter approximately 0.4 μm). © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The nucleus isthmi as an intertectal relay for the ipsilateral oculotectal projection in the frog, Rana pipiens

Reconstruction of serial sections through the nucleus isthmi in the frog Rana pipiens shows that the cortex of the nucleus consists of a sheet of cells which is folded back on itself to form two more or less parallel faces. Cyto-architectural features allow three regions to be distinguished: a 7“rim region,” which previous work had suggested may be involved in the physiological pathway from one eye to the ipsilateral tectal lobe, and two additional regions which are here termed the anterior and posterior “nonrim cortex,” re-spectively. The cytoarchitectural features which distinguish the rim region from the other two regions are largely absent in the tadpole. Analysis of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) following widespread injections into one tectal lobe indicates that the anterior nonrim cortex projects ipsilaterally while the rim cortex and posterior nonrim cortex both project contralaterally. The differing projections of the three regions are paralleled by the pattern of retrograde degeneration observed after unilateral tectal lesions. We have studied the topographic organization of the connections between the nucleus isthmi and the two tectal lobes by making small injections of HRP at tectal loci with known visual field input. Patterns of retrograde cellular labelling show that the anterior nonrim cortex projects topographically to the entirety of the tectal lobe on the same side of the brain. The rim region projects topographically to the binocularly activated part of the opposite tectal lobe; the posterior nonrim cortex projects to the monocularly activated part. There is a discontinuity in the mapping from the nucleus to the opposite tectal lobe which corresponds to the border between binocular and monocular tectum. Patterns of anterograde labelling indicate that the afferent projection from the ipsilateral tectal lobe is topographic and organized so that afferents from a given tectal locus contact cells in the rostral part of the nucleus which project back to that locus. Afferents from tectal re-gions representing binocular visual field in addition continue across the nucleus to terminate within the rim region. The organization of the afferent and efferent projections of this region is such as to link tectal loci which relate to the same direction in visual space. Our findings provide new evidence that the nucleus isthmi is involved in the pathway from one eye to the ipsilateral tectal lobe. They also show how the nucleus is organized to distribute information from a given locus in one tectal lobe to cells which project to the visually corresponding but in general anatomically different pairs of loci in the two tectal lobes. Finally, our findings confirm the existence of a projection from the nucleus isthmi to the opposite monocular tectum and suggest that this may be part of an intertectal circuit linking anatomically corresponding rather than visually corresponding pairs of tectal loci.     

Topographic and morphometric effects of bilateral embryonic eye removal on the optic tectum and nucleus isthmus of the leopard frog

Rana pipiens were raised through metamorphosis after extirpation of both eye primordia at Shumway embryonic stage 17 (Shumway '40). The visual connections between the isthmic nuclei and the optic tectum were examined in these animals using horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry. Isthmo-tectal projections are normally aligned with the primary retinotectal map. We asked whether these connections would develop normal topographic organization in the absence of normal retinal input. HRP was formed into a solid pellet (? 200–500 μm diameter) and inserted into one tectal lobe on the tip of a fine metal probe. The procedure produced relatively restricted retrograde label in somas and dendrites in both isthmi nuclei. In the nucleus isthmus ipsilateral to the tectal lobe receiving the HRP pellet, processes of tecto-isthmi neurons were labeled by anterograde transport. The topography of the isthmo-tectal and tecto-isthmic projections were identical in the developmentally enucleated animals and in normal frogs, even though eye removal severely reduced the volume of the optic tecta and the isthmi nuclei. Thus our analyses indicate that retinal contacts do not play an active role in the development of the positional or polarity cues that are involved in “mapping” projections between central visual nuclei. These results are discussed in the context of peripheral specification of central connections and in terms of models that have recently been proposed to explain the development of the retinotectal system.     

Anatomy and physiology of a binocular system in the frograna pipiens

The locations of tectal neurons projecting to nucleus isthmi (n. isthmi) were found by iontophoretic injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) into n. isthmi. After retrograde transport, stained tectal somata are found to lie almost exclusively in layer 6 and below of the ipsilateral tectum. Many cells are colored throughout the extent of their dendrites into the fine rami, giving the appearance of a Golgi stain. Nucleus isthmi receives projections from the ipsilateral tectum and from no other region. Nucleus isthmi units recorded electrically respond to visual stimuli and are arranged in a topographic map of the visual field. There are two types of receptive fields, those with small centers and those with large centers. The small centers are about 3-5 degrees in diameter, similar to type 2 optic nerve fibers. Their response is to many of the same geometric features of stimulus as excite type 2 fibers. The large centers are at least 7-10 degrees in diameter and respond to many of the same features as excite types 3 and 4 optic nerve fibers. The responsiveness of small and large center n. isthmi units is very similar to the elements of the ipsilateral visual field projection onto tectum, i.e. the neuropilar units recorded in layers A and 8 of the tectum when the contralateral eye is occluded. These are in strong contrast to those of tectal cells of layer 6 and below, which have large receptive fields, show far less vivacious response, adapt extremely rapidly to repeated stimuli and are hard to describe in terms of characteristic stimuli because they are unresponsive most of the time. We suggest, therefore, that the axons of tecto-isthmic cells are quite active and that their cell bodies, located in layer 6 and below, only fire occasionally on the firing of their axons.     

N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists prevent interaction of binocular maps in Xenopus tectum

Glutamate receptors appear to play a key role in several forms of experience-dependent modification of both the strength of synapses and synaptic connectivity. In developing Xenopus frogs, the connections made by isthmotectal axons relaying visual input from the eye to the ipsilateral tectum are markedly influenced by the visual activity of contralateral retinotectal axons, and normal binocular visual input is necessary in order for the ipsilateral visuotectal map to come into register with the contralateral map. We have tested whether NMDA receptors play a role in establishment of the topographic matching of binocular maps during development. We have examined the effects of chronic treatment of tectum with either the receptor agonist NMDA or the antagonists APV or CPP applied throughout early postmetamorphic life using subpial implants of drug-impregnated elvax. Both antagonists blocked the matching of the ipsilateral map to the contralateral map, while NMDA permitted such matching. Our data therefore indicate that NMDA receptors are involved in the experience-dependent establishment of matching binocular maps during development.     

Optic tectum of the eastern garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. V. Morphology of brainstem afferents and general discussion

Brainstem neurons that project to the optic tectum of the eastern garter snake were identified by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. The distribution and morphology of tectal afferent axons from the thalamus, pretectum, nucleus isthmi, and midbrain reticular formation were then studied by anterograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. Diencephalic projections to the tectum arise from the ventral lateral geniculate complex ipsilaterally and the ventrolateral nucleus, suprapeduncular nucleus, and nucleus of the ventral supraoptic decussation bilaterally. Three pretectal groups (the lentiform thalamic nucleus, the lentiform mesencephalic-pretectal complex and the geniculate pretectal nucleus) give rise to heavy, bilateral tectal projections. Small neurons in nucleus isthmi and large reticular neurons in nucleus lateralis profundus mesencephali also give rise to bilateral projections. Caudal to the tectum, projections arise bilaterally from the pontine and medullary tegmentum, nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, the posterior colliculus, and the sensory trigeminal nucleus. A small contralateral projection arises from the medial vestibular complex. Tectal afferents from the thalamus, pretectum, nucleus isthmi, and midbrain reticular formation had characteristic morphologies and laminar distributions within the tectum. However, these afferents fall into two groups based on their spatial organization. Afferents from the thalamus and nucleus isthmi arise from small neurons with spatially restricted, highly branched dendritic trees. Their axons terminate in single, highly branched and bouton-rich arbors about 100 micron in diameter. By contrast, afferents from the midbrain reticular formation and the pretectum arise from large neurons with long, radiate, and sparsely branched dendritic trees. Their axons course parallel to the tectal surface and emit numerous collateral branches that are distributed widely through the mediolateral and rostrocaudal extent of either the central or superficial gray layers. Each collateral bears several small, spatially disjunct clusters of boutons.     

Putative cholinergic projections from the nucleus isthmi and the nucleus reticularis mesencephali to the optic tectum in the goldfish (Carassius auratus)

The nucleus isthmi of fish and amphibians has reciprocal connections with the optic tectum, and biochemical studies suggested that it may provide a major cholinergic input to the tectum. In goldfish, we have combined immunohistochemical staining for choline acetyltransferase with retrograde labeling of nucleus isthmi neurons after tectal injections of horseradish peroxidase. Seven fish received tectal horseradish peroxidase injections, and brain tissue from these animals was subsequently processed for the simultaneous visualization of horseradish peroxidase and choline acetyltransferase. In many nucleus isthmi neurons the dense horseradish peroxidase label obscured the choline acetyltransferase reaction product but horseradish peroxidase and choline acetyltransferase were colocalized in 54 cells from nine nuclei isthmi. The somata of nucleus reticularis mesencephali neurons stained so intensely for choline acetyltransferase that we could not determine whether they were labelled also with horseradish peroxidase. However, the large choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive axons of nucleus reticularis mesencephali neurons stained intensely enough for us to follow them rostrally; the axons are clustered together until the level of the rostral tectum where two groupings form: one travels into the tectum and the other travels rostroventrally to cross the midline and enter the contralateral diencephalic preoptic area. We conclude therefore that cholinergic neurons project to the optic tectum from the nucleus isthmi as well as nucleus reticularis mesencephali in goldfish.     

Relationship between isthmotectal fibers and other tectopetal systems in the leopard frog

We studied the relationship of isthmotectal input to other tectal afferent fiber systems in three ways. 1) Using horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry, we determined the nonretinal inputs to the superficial tectum. In different sets of animals we a) applied HRP to the tectal surface; b) inserted HRP crystals into the tectum; c) injected small volumes of HRP solutions into the superficial tectum. N. isthmi accounts for more than 65% of the nonretinal extrinsic input in the superficial tectal layers. One set of fibers from the contralateral n. isthmi projects to the most superficial layer. Fibers from posterior thalamus and tegmentum project to both superficial and deeper layers in the tectum, but not to the most superficial layer. The ipsilaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers terminate in the deeper superficial layers. 2) We investigated the relationship between retinofugal and contralaterally projecting isthmotectal pathways. We orthogradely labelled n. isthmi fibers by unilateral HRP injections into n. isthmi, and we also labelled retinal fibers by injecting tritiated l-proline into both eyes. In such animals contralaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers cross in the dorsal posterior region of the optic chiasm. From the chiasm to the tectum isthmotectal fibers and retinofugal fibers are admixed. 3) We determined whether other fiber systems cross with contralaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers. We cut the posterior part of the optic chiasm and applied HRP crystals to the cut. Only n. isthmi and retina are retrogradely labelled.     

Wulst efferents in the little owl Athene noctua: an investigation of projections to the optic tectum.

The efferent projections from the Wulst were studied in the little owl, Athene noctua, using anterograde migration of wheat-germ-agglutinin conjugated horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP). Wulst projections were distributed to telencephalic, diencephalic and mesencephalic targets in a general pattern similar to that previously described in other avian species. Our results on the organization of the Wulst-optic tectum pathway in the little owl reveal well defined and laminarly arranged terminal projections into the superficial tectal layers, with a distribution suggestive of topographical relationships between neurons of origin in the Wulst and termination fields in the optic tectum. In contrast to lateral-eyed birds, the little owl possesses conspicuous contralateral projections to the optic tectum. Ipsilateral and contralateral efferents are restricted to different tectal regions, i.e. ipsilateral projections to the caudo-dorsal and contralateral projections to the rostro-ventral optic tectum. In addition, the anterior and posterior Wulst differentially contribute to the ipsilateral and contralateral projections to the optic tectum. This differential organization of Wulst efferents, as well as the presence of substantial contralateral projections, might be related to the high degree of binocular overlap typical of frontal-eyed birds. At a functional level, electric potentials recorded in the optic tectum and evoked by visual stimulation showed that information from one eye can reach the ipsilateral optic tectum. After Wulst ablation, the amplitude of these potentials was significantly reduced, indicating that Wulst efferents may influence visually-evoked activity in the optic tectum.     

Topographic projections between the nucleus isthmi and the tectum of the frog Rana pipiens.

The connections between the nucleus isthmi and the tectum in the frog have been determined by several anatomical techniques: iontophoresis of horseradish peroxidase into the tectum, iontophoresis of 3H-porline into the nucleus isthmi and the tectum, and Fink-Heimer degeneration staining after lesions of the nucleus isthmi. The results show that the nucleus isthmi projects bilaterally to the tectal lobes. The ipsilateral isthmio-tectal fibers are distributed in the superficial layers of the tectum, coincident with the retionotectal terminals. The contralateral isthmio-tectal fibers travel anteriorly adjacent to the lateral optic tract and cross the midline in the supraoptic ventral decussation, where they turn dorsally and caudally; upon reaching the tectum, the fibers end in two discrete layers, layers 8 and A of Potter. The tectum projects to the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi and there is a reciprocal topographic relationship between the two structures. Thus, a retino-tecto-isthmio-tectal route exists which may contribute to the indirect ipsilateral retinotectal projection which is observed electrophysiologically. The connections between the nucleus isthmi and the tectum in the frog are strinkingly similar to the connections between the parabigeminal nucleus and the superior colliculus of mammals.     

Changes in the topographically organized connections between the nucleus isthmi and the optic tectum after partial tectal ablation in adult goldfish

The projection of the nucleus isthmi to the ipsilateral optic tectum was examined in normal goldfish. This was compared to the projection in animals in which the entire visual field had been induced to compress onto a rostral half tectum by caudal tectal ablation. The isthmo-tectal projection was examined by making localized injections of horseradish peroxidase into the optic tecta and observing the patterns of labeled cells within the nucleus isthmi. The teleost nucleus isthmi consists of a cell sparse medulla covered by a cellular cortex, which is thick on the rostral, medial, and dorsal surfaces of the nucleus. Almost all isthmic cells projecting to the tectum were located in the area of thick cortex. In normal fish, rostral tectal injections labeled cells in the rostroventral portion of the thick cortex; injections midway in the rostrocaudal tectal axis labeled more caudodorsally located cells, and caudal tectal injections labeled cells a little further caudally in extreme dorsal cortex. The rostroventral to caudodorsal isthmic axis was therefore seen to project rostrocaudally along the tectum. This topography contrasts somewhat with the situation seen in amphibia where the rostrocaudal tectal axis receives projections from the rostrocaudal isthmic axis. In fish with half-tectal ablations, injections near the caudal edge of the half tectum (at a site that had originally been midtectal) labeled cells that had previously projected to caudal tectum. Rostral tectal injections in fish with compression of the visual field gave a normal pattern of labeled isthmic cells. The results indicate that a topographically ordered isthmo-tectal projection exists in goldfish that may be induced to compress onto a half tectum.     

Topographic projections between the nucleus isthmi and the optic tectum in a teleost,Navodon Modestus

Following horseradish peroxidase injections into the optic tectum of a teleost,Navodon modestus, reciprocal and topographic projections between the nucleus isthmi and the ipsilateral optic tectum were determined. The isthmo-tectal fibers diverge to the optic tectum while maintaining the spatial arrangements of the isthmic cells from which the fibers originate. The tecto-isthmic projections also keep the spatial arrangements in the optic tectum. The tectal fibers converge near the nucleus isthmi and terminate in the non-cellular portion of the nucleus. The reciprocal topography is apparent in the combined results of 9 experiments with one tectal injection in each region. No labeled cells and fibers were found in the contralateral nucleus isthmi.     

Isthmotectal axons maintain normal arbor size but fail to support normal branch numbers in dark-reared Xenopus laevis

Developing binocular projections to the Xenopus tectum require visual input in order to establish matching topographic maps. In dark-reared Xenopus, the ipsilateral eye's map, relayed via the retino-tecto-isthmotectal pathway, fails initially to acquire normal rostrocaudal order. Moreover, with extended time in the dark, the ipsilateral map becomes progressively less well organized. This phenomenon showed that without binocular cues, the isthmotectal axons are unable to locate proper sites for their terminal zones but left open the issue of whether the axons are able to establish arbors of normal dimensions and/or to sustain normal numbers of branches. In order to test whether dark-rearing modifies isthmotectal axon branching, we have used horseradish peroxidase to examine axons of Xenopus after dark-rearing for periods from 3 to 298 weeks. The results demonstrate that these axons never acquire more than about half the normal numbers of terminals. Surprisingly, however, the dark-reared axons' terminal zones are normal in mediolateral and rostrocaudal extent despite the lack of binocular cues that normally could constrain arbor size by inducing pruning of branches in regions with mismatched visual inputs. The effects of dark-rearing are reversible. After a return to normal lighting conditions, the recovery process begins quickly, with a significant increase in branch numbers within 4 weeks. The terminal zone remains of normal dimensions. These results support the hypothesis that correlated binocular visual input is essential for the maintenance of normal numbers of isthmotectal branches but that normal termination zone size can be established in the absence of visual cues.     

Combining visual information from the two eyes: the relationship between isthmotectal cells that project to ipsilateral and to contralateral optic tectum using fluorescent retrograde labels in the frog, Rana pipiens

The frog nucleus isthmi (homolog of the mammalian parabigeminal nucleus) is a visually responsive tegmental structure that is reciprocally connected with the ipsilateral optic tectum; cells in nucleus isthmi also project to the contralateral optic tectum. We investigated the location of the isthmotectal cells that project ipsilaterally and contralaterally using three retrograde fluorescent label solutions: Alexa Fluor 488 10,000 mw dextran conjugate; Rhodamine B isothiocyanate; and Nuclear Yellow. Dye solutions were pressure-injected into separate sites in the superficial optic tectum. Following a 6-day survival, brains were fixed, sectioned, and then photographed. Injection of the different labels at separate, discrete locations in the optic tectum result in retrograde filling of singly labeled clusters of cells in both the ipsilateral and contralateral nucleus isthmi. Generally, ipsilaterally projecting cells are dorsal to the contralaterally projecting cells, but there is a slight overlap between the two sets of cells. Nonetheless, when different retrograde labels are injected into opposite tecta, there is no indication that individual cells project to both tecta. The set of cells that project to the ipsilateral tectum and the set of cells that project to the contralateral tectum form a visuotopic map in a roughly vertical, transverse slab. Our results suggest that nucleus isthmi can be separated into two regions with cells in the dorsolateral portion projecting primarily to the ipsilateral optic tectum and cells in the ventrolateral nucleus isthmi projecting primarily to the contralateral optic tectum.     

Fiber connections of the nucleus isthmi in the carp (Cyprinus carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

The nucleus pretectalis (NP) is a prominent nucleus in the percomorph pretectum and has been shown to project to the nucleus isthmi in the filefish by an HRP tract-tracing method [Ito et al., 1981], but a homologous nucleus to the NP is apparently lacking in ostariophysans. The present study examined fiber connections of the nucleus isthmi in an ostariophysan teleost, the carp (Cyprinidae, Cyprinus carpio), to identify a nucleus homologous to the percomorph nucleus pretectalis. Identical studies in a percomorph tilapia (Cichlidae, Oreochromis niloticus) were also performed. Injections of biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) or biocytin to the carp nucleus isthmi labeled cells in the ipsilateral optic tectum and nucleus ruber of Goldstein [1905]. Labeled tectal neurons were located in the stratum periventriculare (SPV) and the stratum fibrosum et griseum superficiale (SFGS). The somata in the SPV were pyriform and those in the SFGS were fusiform. No labeled cells were found in the pretectum. Labeled terminals were seen in the ipsilateral nucleus pretectalis superficialis pars parvocellularis (PSp), optic tectum, and bilateral nucleus ruber. Terminals in the nucleus ruber appear to come from tectal neurons in the SFGS labeled by isthmic injections. Thus the nucleus isthmi has reciprocal fiber connections with the ipsilateral optic tectum, receives projections from the ipsilateral nucleus ruber, and projects to the ipsilateral PSp. The nucleus pretectalis homologue is apparently absent in the carp. Studies in tilapia showed that the nucleus isthmi receives bilateral projections from the NP and optic tectum. In addition, the present study revealed a previously unknown afferent from the nucleus ruber to the percomorph nucleus isthmi. The tilapia nucleus isthmi projects to the same targets as in the carp. Isthmic projection neurons in the tilapia optic tectum were located in the SPV and pyriform with a similar shape to the carp SPV neurons that project to the nucleus isthmi. No labeled cells were found in the SFGS of tilapia optic tectum. The fusiform neurons in the SFGS of the carp optic tectum possess various hodological similarities with the NP and may correspond to the NP neurons of percomorphs.     

Tectal connections in Python reticulatus

The origins of the axons terminating in the mesencephalic tectum in Python reticulatus were examined by unilateral tectal injections of horseradish peroxidase. Kutrogradely labeled cells were observed bilaterally throughout the spinal cord in all subdivisions of the trigeminal system, with the exception of nucleus principalis, which showed labeled cells only on the ipsilateral side. Labeling of the reticular formation occurred bilaterally in nucleus reticular is interiormagnocellularis, nucleus reticularis lateralis, nucleus reticularis medius and the mesencephalic reticular formation. The tectum also receives bilateral projections from the dorsal tegmentaJ field, the nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and nucleus isthmi, and ipsilateral projections from nucleus profundus mesencephali. A few labeled cells were found ipsilaterally in the locus coeruleus and in nuclei vestibulares ventrolateralis and centromedialis. In the diencephalon labeled cells were observed ipsilaterally in nucleus ventrolateralis thalami, nucleus ventromedialis thalami, nucleus suprapeduncularis, and in the dorsal and ventral lateral geniculate nuclei. Bilateral labeling was observed in nucleus periventricularis hypo-thalami. Furthermore, labeling was ipsilaterally present in the ventral telen-cephalic areas. The tectum in Python reticulatus receives a wide variety of afferent connections which confirm the role of the tectum as an integration center of visual and exteroceptive information.