Translumbar repair of a type II endoleak associated with an aorta-to-left renal vein fistula after aortic stent-graft placement

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a serious medical condition with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Endograft repair of AAAs is a therapy in evolution, but offers promise as a minimally invasive treatment option. Persistent sac pressurization via endoleaks has limited wider application of stent-grafting technology. The present report describes a case of an AAA with rupture into a retroaortic left renal vein that was treated acutely with aortic stent-graft repair. Continued aneurysm enlargement and a large type II endoleak drained by an arteriovenous fistula were subsequently treated via a translumbar approach.     

Transcatheter embolization of a type II endoleak after hybrid repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

Hybrid stent-graft procedures with visceral revascularization have been reported as an alternative treatment option for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs), although the potential advantages of reduced morbidity and mortality compared with open surgical repair have not been definitively demonstrated. Endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with endoleaks in as many as 20% of cases in some series, often requiring repeat intervention. In the present case, during follow-up after a hybrid TAAA repair, a patient developed a type II endoleak originating from a celiac artery that was not ligated at its origin. The endoleak was successfully treated by transcatheter coil embolization.     

Ischemic skin ulceration complicating glue embolization of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

The optimal treatment for type II endoleaks remains unclear. The present report describes a case of ischemic skin ulceration after glue embolization of a type II endoleak with challenging access in a multiply comorbid 82-year-old woman with an expanding aneurysm sac 3 years after endovascular aneurysm repair. Embolization was performed from a proximal position with an n-butyl cyanoacrylate/Ethiodol mixture to allow flow into the endoleak because direct sac puncture was hazardous. One week after intervention, an eschar, which progressed to superficial necrosis as a result of partial nontarget delivery of sclerosant, developed over the left iliac crest. The eschar was self-limiting, with complete resolution by 6 months.     

Aortic side branch embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: incidence of type II endoleak

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of embolization of aortic side branches and its impact on the incidence of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed in 74 patients. Aortic side branch vessels were evaluated on the preoperative angiogram and computed tomography (CT) and, where embolization of lumbar and inferior mesenteric vessels was considered technically possible, this was attempted prior to endovascular repair. Follow-up CT was used to assess the presence of type II endoleak. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were followed up for longer than 1 month. Embolization was attempted in 25 cases, successfully in 10, with partial success in 11, and failure in four. Twenty patients with successful or partly successful preoperative embolization were discharged and followed-up. Four (20%) had demonstrable type II endoleak during follow-up, with two of these persisting at latest follow-up. Of 43 patients without previous embolization, there were 10 (23.3%) type II endoleaks during the follow-up period, four of these persisting. In cases with type II endoleak, mean sac diameter change was -0.5 mm in the cases with previous embolization and +3.1 mm without. The mean period to onset of type II endoleak was 6.9 months without, and 15.3 months with, previous embolization. CONCLUSION: Although the cohort size is below a level that would confer significance, the trend of these findings is such as to suggest a lack of influence of aortic side branch embolization on the incidence of type II endoleak during the follow-up period.     

MRI versus helical CT for endoleak detection after endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and helical CT for endoleak detection. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with nitinol stent-grafts. Follow-up data sets included contrast-enhanced biphasic CT and MRI within 48 hr after the intervention; at 3, 6, and 12 months; and yearly thereafter. The endoleak size was categorized as < or = 3%, > 3% < or = 10%, > 10% < or = 30%, or > 30% of the maximum cross-sectional aneurysm area. A consensus interpretation of CT and MRI was defined as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Of 252 data sets, 141 showed evidence for endoleaks. The incidence of types I, II, and III endoleaks and complex endoleaks was 3.2%, 40.1%, 8.7%, and 4.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for endoleak detection was 92.9%, 44.0%, 34.8%, and 38.3% for MRI, biphasic CT, uniphasic arterial CT, and uniphasic late CT, respectively. The corresponding negative predictive values were 91.7%, 58.4%, 54.7%, and 56.1%, respectively. The overall accuracy of endoleak detection and correct sizing was 95.2%, 58.3%, 55.6%, and 57.1% for MRI, biphasic CT, uniphasic arterial CT, and uniphasic late CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is significantly superior to biphasic CT for endoleak detection and rating of endoleak size, followed by uniphasic late and uniphasic arterial CT scans. MRI shows a significant number of endoleaks in cases with negative CT findings and may help illuminate the phenomenon of endotension. Endoleak rates reported after endovascular aneurysm repair substantially depend on the imaging techniques used.     

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后Ⅱ型内漏的栓塞治疗

内漏是腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后并发症之一,本院血管外科应用钢圈栓塞治疗Ⅱ型内漏1例,就其经验总结如下. 患者为女性,81岁.于2006年4月24日因肾下腹主动脉瘤(图1)行腔内修复术,置入分叉型人工血管内支架(Zenith,Cook,USA),远端锚定于髂总动脉,保留两侧髂内动脉.患者恢复顺利,术后5 d出院.术后1年随访CTA显示支架形态位置满意,瘤腔内未见明显对比剂充盈,但瘤体直径与术前相比,无明显缩小(最大径仍为6 cm).2008年3月24日因下腹饱胀并扪及搏动性肿块1个月余来诊.     

Type II endoleak after endoaortic graft implantation: diagnosis with helical CT arteriography

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess endoleak shapes and locations within aneurysms to differentiate type II from type I and type III endoleaks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board granted an exemption for this HIPAA-compliant study; patient informed consent was not required. A retrospective review of arterial phase helical computed tomographic (CT) studies and medical records was performed for 39 patients (29 men, 10 women; age range, 60-89 years; mean, 78.5 years) who had an endoleak after endoaortic graft implantation for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and who subsequently underwent angiography (n = 25), surgery (n = 8), or long-term follow-up (n = 6) to classify their endoleak into a specific type. At CT, endoleak shape (tubular or nontubular) and location (central or peripheral) were recorded. An endoleak was classified as type II if it contained a peripheral tubular component (PTC) near the aortic wall, with or without an identifiable feeding vessel. Endoleaks without these features were classified as type I or III. The Fisher exact test was used to assess associations between CT findings and endoleak type. RESULTS: There were 22 type II and 17 type I or III endoleaks. CT enabled correct identification of 22 (100%) of 22 type II endoleaks, all of which contained a PTC. Of 17 type I or III endoleaks, only two (12%) contained a PTC and were misclassified as type II endoleaks; the remaining 15 (88%) were correctly classified. Overall, CT enabled correct identification of endoleaks as type II or type I or III in 37 (95%) of 39 patients. PTCs were significantly more common (P < .001) in type II than in type I or III endoleaks, with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 100%, 88.2%, 94.9%, 100%, and 91.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A PTC is a statistically significant predictor of type II endoleak in most patients.     

Direct thrombin injection into aneurysmal sac in a patient with a type II endoleak

Endovascular grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms provides a good alternative to open surgery, especially in high-risk patients. Endoleaks are a well-recognized complication and are typically diagnosed on CT. We describe a case in which a patient's endoleak was evaluated by MRI and successfully treated by direct thrombin injection into the site of the leak.     

Translumbar catheter redirection using a tip-deflector technique

A new technique is described for reversing the direction of the catheter tip during translumbar aortography, without the need for partial withdrawal of the catheter from the aortic lumen. The method ensures optimal delivery of contrast medium at the desired level, while avoiding the risk of retroperitoneal bleeding or dislodgement during catheter manipulation.     

Endovascular treatment of arteriovenous fistula caused by ruptured iliac aneurysm and type II endoleak

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) caused by an isolated iliac aneurysm rupture and postoperative type II endoleak are rare and life threatening. We report here a case of AVF caused by a ruptured iliac aneurysm and postoperative type II endoleak. The patient was successfully treated by implanting a covered stent to treat the ruptured iliac aneurysm. However, type II endoleak with AVF persisted after the operation and was treated with transiliac vein embolization. The patient recovered uneventfully during the 2-month follow-up period.     

胸主动脉夹层腔内修复术内漏研究

目的 探讨胸主动脉夹层腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗Stanford B型胸主动脉夹层发生内漏原因及分型特点.方法 回顾性分析2007年3月至2014年5月确诊为StandfordB型胸主动脉夹层并完成TEVAR术治疗的189例患者,观察术中及术后内漏分型及影像学表现,患者生存率和生存质量.结果 TEVAR术中和术后共25例患者发生内漏,发生率为13.2％(25/189).其中急性内漏22例,包括Ⅰ型14例(7.4％),Ⅱ型8例(4.2％);迟发性内漏3例,包括Ⅱ型2例(1.1％),Ⅲ型l例(0.5％).术后患者生存质量未下降,未出现截瘫、肾动脉缺血等严重并发症.结论 TEVAR术内漏分型、影响因素不同,内漏发生概率各异,急性和迟发性内漏中Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型内漏最为常见.