Feasibility of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing via a single-pass (VDD) pacing lead employing a floating atrial ring (dipole): case series, future considerations, and refinements

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of DDD pacing from a standard single-pass VDD pacemaker system. Over the past 2 decades significant advances have been made in the development of single-pass VDD pacing systems. These have been shown in long-term prospective studies to effectively preserve atrioventricular (AV)synchrony in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function. What remains problematic is the development of a single-pass pacing system capable of DDD pacing. Such a lead configuration would be useful in those patients with peripheral venous anomalies and in younger patients with congenital anomalies, which may require lead revisions in the future. In addition, with the increased use of resynchronization (biventricular pacing) therapy, the availability of a reliable single-pass lead will minimize operative time, enhance patient safety, and minimize the amount of hardware within the heart. The feasibility of DDD pacing via a Medtronic Capsure VDD-2 (Model #5038) pacing lead was evaluated. Twenty patients who presented with AV block and normal sinus node function were recruited for this study. Atrial pacing thresholds and sensitivities were assessed intraoperatively in the supine position with various respiratory maneuvers. Five patients who agreed to participate in long-term follow-up received a dual-chamber generator and were evaluated periodically over a 12-month period. Mean atrial sensitivity was 2.35 +/- 0.83 mV at the time of implantation. Effective atrial stimulation was possible in all patients at the time of implantation (mean stimulation threshold 3.08 +/- 1.04 V at 0.5 ms [bipolar], 3.34 +/- 0.95 V at 0.5 ms [unipolar]). Five of the 20 patients received a Kappa KDR701 generator, and atrial electrical properties were followed up over a 1-year period. There was no significant change in atrial pacing threshold or incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation over the 1-year follow-up. A standard single-pass VDD pacing lead system was capable of DDD pacing intraoperatively and during long-term follow-up. Despite higher than usual thresholds via the atrial dipole, pacemaker telemetry revealed < 10% use of atrial pacing dipole over a 12-month period, which would minimally deplete the pacemaker's battery. In addition, the telemetry confirmed appropriate sensing and pacing of the atrial dipole throughout the study period. At this time such systems can serve as back-up DDD pacing systems with further refinements required to optimize atrial thresholds in all patients.     

Pre-implant determinants of adequate long-term function of single lead VDD pacemakers.

AIMS: An inherent limitation of single lead VDD pacing is the inability to stimulate the atria. Reprogramming and upgrading the pacemaker system may be required when sinus node dysfunction, atrial undersensing, or atrial fibrillation develop. We evaluated whether routine clinical information is sufficient to select patients to benefit in long-term from VDD pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected data on 12-lead and monitored electrocardiograms and routine clinical information at implantation of a VDD pacing system in 350 consecutive patients with grade II or III atrioventricular conduction block. The age at implantation was 74.5 +/- 8.0 years, and the follow-up lasted 1.5 +/- 1.5 years. The cumulative maintenance of VDD pacing mode was 91.%. Loss of VDD mode was due to permanent atrial fibrillation in 16 (4.6%), sinus node dysfunction in six (1.7%). atrial undersensing in 11 (3.1%). Chronic atrial fibrillation developed in 23% of patients who had heart enlargement in chest x-ray and a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter. A criterion of normal sinus rate at implantation sufficiently predicted adequate sinus node function. Poor atrial sensing was not predicted by pre-implant characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, adequate sinus-driven atrial rate and no history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and cardiac enlargement predict maintenance of the VDD pacing mode in elderly patients treated for heart block. Routine information available at implantation is sufficient to guide acceptance of single lead VDD pacing therapy.     

Atrial Sensing and AV Synchrony in Single Lead VDD Pacemakers: A Prospective Comparison to DDD Devices with Bipolar Atrial Leads

INTRODUCTION: Single lead VDD pacing has offered an alternative to DDD systems in patients with isolated AV block. Up to now, however, the relative performance of these pacemaker systems was not systematically compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred sixty patients who received either a VDD pacemaker (n = 180) or a DDD device (n = 180) with a bipolar atrial lead were investigated prospectively for a mean period of 30 +/- 13 months. Pacemaker function was analyzed by telemetry, Holter monitoring, and exercise ECG. Time of implantation and fluoroscopy was significantly lower with VDD devices (44.3 +/- 5.1 min vs 74.4 +/- 13.5 min and 4.6 +/- 2.5 min vs 10.3 +/- 5.6 min in DDD pacemakers, respectively). Intermittent atrial undersensing occurred in 23.3% of patients with a VDD pacemaker and in 9.4% with DDD devices (NS). The incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias did not differ between the VDD (6.7%) and the DDD group (6.1%). Sinus node dysfunction developed in 1.9% of patients, but the vast majority (85.7%) of patients were asymptomatic. There was a tendency for a higher rate of operative revisions in the DDD group (6.1% vs 3.3% in VDD pacemakers, P = 0.15). Cumulative maintenance of AV-synchronized pacing mode was 94.9% in patients with VDD pacemakers and 92.1% with DDD devices (NS). CONCLUSION: With the benefit of a simpler implant procedure, long-term outcome of single lead VDD pacing is equivalent to DDD pacing in patients with AV block and preoperative normal sinus node function.     

Stability of AV conduction in sick sinus node syndrome patients with implanted atrial pacemakers

Single-chamber atrial pacing is effective in the management of sinus node dysfunction, subject to the uncertainty of long-term atrioventricular conduction. Despite the accepted observation that many patients with sinus node dysfunction also have atrioventricular conduction disease, data do not exist on the development of atrioventricular block in those patients with permanent single-chamber atrial pacing. Of 70 patients who received single-chamber atrial pacing from 1967 to 1982 (mean duration of pacing was 33 months), only two patients of 58 (3.4%) of those with sinus node dysfunction developed atrioventricular (AV) block—after 14 months in one patient and after 23 months of successful atrial pacing in the other. None of the 12 patients paced for tachyarrhythmia management developed AV block. Of the 70 patients, 37 had assessment of AV conduction by incremental atrial pacing at the time of implant and 20 patients underwent atrial pacing on the basis of surface ECG and clinical judgment. Electrophysiologic studies were conducted only in those patients being paced for control of supraventricular arrhythmias. Only 5 of the 70 patients required conversion to ventricular pacing for technical difficulties; three of these conversions occurred in the early 1970's before the advent of atrial tined or J leads; one was for irreparable lead fracture and only one occurred in a patient with a newer design atrial lead. In conclusion, progression to AV block in patients with permanent atrial pacing is uncommon; formal electrophysiologic studies are necessary mainly in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias; and in the majority of patients, AV conduction can be assessed at the time of implant. Continued improvement in atrial leads should make atrial pacing even more successful.     

DDD and single-lead VDD pacing: evaluation of atrial signal dynamic changes

BACKGROUND: Single-lead VDD pacing systems are an alternative to conventional DDD pacemakers in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus function. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess changes of P-wave amplitude occurring in dynamic conditions in two groups of patients with a single-lead VDD and with a DDD pacing system, respectively. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with second- or third-degree AV block and normal sinus function were enrolled prospectively into the study. Seventeen patients were implanted with a single-lead VDD pacing system and 11 with a DDD pacemaker. Patients were evaluated at 3 months (all patients) and at 6 months (26 patients) at supine and in dynamic conditions (postural changes, hyperventilation, and during exercise). RESULTS: Mean P-wave values at supine were 1.92 +/- 1.10 mV at 3 months and 1.76 +/- 1.01 mV at 6 months for VDD systems, and 4.63 +/- 2.18 mV at 3 months and 4.58 +/- 2.80 mV at 6 months for DDD pacemakers. In dynamic conditions, P-wave amplitude changes compared with supine condition ranged between -74 and +226% in VDD, and between -53 and +138% in DDD; however P-wave amplitudes showed no significant changes compared with baseline. Moreover, changes in atrial signal amplitudes did not occur randomly, and in both systems P-wave amplitudes remained significantly correlated with supine values. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of P-wave amplitude variations occurs in different postural conditions or during exercise, both with single-lead VDD and DDD pacing systems. However, with appropriate programming of atrial sensitivity based on supine values, constant atrial tracking can be maintained.     

The Current Status of Single Lead Dual Chamber Sensing and Pacing

The use of single lead, atrial synchronous ventricular (VDD) pacing in patients with high grade atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus node function is an acceptable alternative to dual chamber (DDD) pacing. Implantation and follow up procedures are simplified, and cost is usually reduced by more than the cost of an additional atrial lead. With the use of either diagonally arranged dipole or closely spaced ring electrodes, reliable atrial sensing can be achieved using differential atrial amplifier and high atrial sensitivity. Also oversensing is infrequently observed using provocation tests and dynamic recordings, clinical undersensing is unusual and minimized by programming to the highest atrial sensitivity. However, as atrial pacing is not possible, loss of AV synchrony and rate response may occur for unrecognized or progressive sinus node disease and lower rate limit. The development of single lead dual chamber pacing system may overcome this limitation. Recent studies have demonstrated that atrial pacing can be effective either with the use of a special pacing lead configuration or via floating atrial electrode with a novel stimulation method. Overlapping Biphasic Impulse (OLBI) can reduce atrial pacing threshold. Early clinical experience suggested that this new pacing method can provide effective and reliable atrial pacing with a relatively low incidence of diaphragmatic pacing. Thus the problem of atrial sensing is solved with a single pass lead but further long term evaluation is required to assess the efficacy and feasibility of new instrumentation for single lead dual chamber pacing.     

Predictors of loss of atrioventricular synchrony in single lead VDD pacing

Objective—To evaluate maintenance of proper VDD function, defined as persistence of sinus rhythm with atrial synchronous ventricular pacing, and to define factors predicting failure of the VDD mode in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus function.
Design—Observational study in 86 consecutive patients (mean (SD) age 74 (12) years; 38 women, 48 men) with single lead VDD pacing systems (Intermedics Unity, n = 66, Medtronic Thera VDD, n = 20), implanted for high degree AV block with documented normal sinus node. Pacemaker function was assessed by event counters, telemetric measurements, and Holter recordings. Demographic, radiological, and pacing variables were correlated with loss of proper VDD function.
Results—During a mean (SD) follow up of 10 (10) months (range 1-37), sinus rhythm and atrial triggered ventricular pacing were maintained in 70 of 86 patients (81%). Atrial undersensing was observed in nine patients, lead migration in two, atrial fibrillation in three, and symptomatic sinus bradycardia in two. Univariate predictors of loss of proper VDD function were: low position of the atrial dipole relative to the carina ( 6 cm; p < 0.01) during fluoroscopy; and maximum programmable atrial sensitivity of the pacemaker (p = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis, only dipole position remained predictive of outcome (p < 0.02). Not predictive were sex, age, symptoms before pacemaker implantation, cardiothoracic ratio or dilatation of individual heart chambers on chest x ray, side of device implant, and P wave amplitude at implant.
Conclusions—To maintain proper VDD function in the long term, a low anatomical dipole position relative to the carina should be avoided. Electrical guidance of dipole positioning does not seem to influence long term outcome.

Keywords: VDD pacing;  atrioventricular synchrony;  arrhythmias     

Single-lead VDD-pacing system incorporating high impedance stimulation: a multicentre study.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new VDD pacing system incorporating a high impedance, single-pass VDD lead. The new lead is a bipolar, steroid-eluting, high impedance lead with a full-ring atrial dipole. METHODS AND RESULTS: The system was implanted in 46 patients with high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. Patients were followed at pre-discharge, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The mean measured P-wave amplitude was stable, with values between 1.18 and 1.43 mV. Atrial sensing was reliable during short-term evaluation at rest and in the sitting position, with AV-synchronous stimulation between 98.79 +/- 6.90% and 99.73 +/- 1.47%. Holter recordings after 6 weeks demonstrated AV-synchronous stimulation in 99.57 1.03% of all P-waves. Lead impedance was stable during follow-up, with mean values between 1000 and 1167 Q. Mean ventricular pacing thresholds (at 0.5 ms) were 0.47 V at implant, 0.49 V at pre-discharge, 0.74 V at 6 weeks, and 0.72 V at 3 months. R-wave amplitude remained stable between 14.9 and 16.7 mV during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This new single-pass VDD lead system provided reliable atrial sensing and stable high impedance stimulation during a 3-month follow-up period.     

Comparison of first- and second-generation leadless pacemakers in patients with sinus rhythm and complete atrioventricular block

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of leadless cardiac pacemakers (LPMs) as an alternative to conventional transvenous cardiac pacing have been largely reported. The first generation of the Micra^TM transcatheter pacing system (VR; Medtronic) was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemaker syndrome in sinus rhythm patients. A second-generation system (AV) now provides atrioventricular synchrony through atrial mechanical (Am) sensing capability (VDD mode).

Objective

We sought to compare VR and AV systems in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing (Vp) for complete atrioventricular block.

Methods

All consecutive patients implanted with an LPM in our department for complete atrioventricular block were retrospectively screened. Patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus dysfunction, or Vp burden <20% at 1 month postimplantation were excluded. Patients were systematically followed with a visit at 1 month, and then at least once a year.

Results

A total of 93 patients—45 VR (2015–2020) and 48 AV (2020–2021)—were included. VR and AV patients had similar baseline characteristics, except for VR patients being older (80 ± 8 vs. 77 ± 9 years, p = 0.049). The mean Vp burden was 77% in the VR and 82% in the AV group (p = 0.38). In AV patients, the median AV synchronous beats rate was 78%, with 65% having a >66% rate. An E/A ratio <1.2 as measured on echocardiography was the only independent predictor of accurate atrial mechanical tracking (p = 0.01). One-year survival rate was similar in both groups. Five patients in the VR and 0 in the AV group eventually developed pacemaker syndrome within 1 year post-implantation (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

In sinus rhythm patients with chronic Vp for complete atrioventricular block implanted with an LPM, the atrial mechanical sensing algorithm allowed significant atrioventricular synchrony in most patients and was associated with no occurrence of—otherwise rare—pacemaker syndrome.     

The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing

The ability to program different atrioventricular (AV) delay intervals for paced and sensed atrial events is incorporated in the design of some newer dual chamber pacemakers. However, little is known regarding the hemodynamic benefit of differential AV delay intervals or the magnitude of difference between optimal AV delay intervals for paced and sensed P waves in individual patients. In this study, Doppler-derived cardiac output was used to examine the optimal timing of paced and sensed atrial events in 24 patients with a permanent dual chamber pacemaker. The hemodynamic effect of utilizing separate optimal delay intervals for sensed and paced events compared with utilizing the same fixed AV delay interval for both was determined. The optimal delay interval during DVI (AV sequential) pacing and VDD (atrial triggered, ventricular inhibited) pacing at similar heart rates was 176 +/- 44 and 144 +/- 48 ms (p less than 0.002), respectively. The mean difference between the optimal AV delay intervals for sensed (VDD) and paced (DVI) P waves was 32 ms and was up to 100 ms in some individuals. The difference between optimal AV delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events was similar in patients with complete heart block and those with intact AV node conduction. At the respective optimal AV delay intervals for sensed and paced P waves, there was no significant difference in the cardiac output during VDD compared with DVI pacing. However, cardiac output significant declined during VDD pacing at the optimal AV delay interval for a paced event and during DVI pacing at the optimal interval for a sensed event.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of sinus node disease after pacemaker implantation for exclusive atrioventricular (AV) block. DESIGN: 441 patients were followed after VDD (n = 219) or DDD pacemaker (n = 222) implantation for AV block over a mean period of 37 months. Sinus node disease and atrial arrhythmias had been excluded by Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise preoperatively in 286 patients (group A). In 155 patients with complete AV block, a sinus rate above 70 beats/min was required for inclusion in the study (group B). Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise were performed two weeks, three months, and every six months after implantation. Sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min, sinoatrial block, sinus arrest, or subnormal increase of heart rate during treadmill exercise were defined as sinus node dysfunction. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of sinus node disease was 0.65% per year without differences between groups. Clinical indicators of sinus node dysfunction were sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min in six patients (1.4%), intermittent sinoatrial block in two (0.5%), and chronotropic incompetence in five patients (1.1%). Only one of these patients (0.2%) was symptomatic. Cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation was 2.0% per year, independent of the method used for the assessment of sinus node function and of the implanted device. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for isolated AV block, sinus node syndrome rarely occurs during follow up. Thus single lead VDD pacing can safely be performed in these patients.     

Atrial pacing for sick sinus syndrome

Atrial pacing is the most physiological way to pace patients with sinus node disease, as it provides both AV synchrony and a normal ventricular activation pattern. Long-term studies comparing atrial and ventricular pacing imply that atrial pacing results in fewer cardiac complications and, possibly, reduced mortality. Ventricular pacing should thus, if possible, be avoided in patients with sinus node disease. The potential risk of impending high-grade AV block during atrial pacing is low, with an annual incidence around 1% if patients are selected appropriately. Approximately 40-50% of patients with sinus node disease show signs of chronotropic incompetence during physical exercise, and are thus candidates for atrial rate responsive pacing. A preoperative evaluation of candidates for atrial pacing should include long-term Holter/telemetry, exercise test, carotid sinus stimulation, and an electrophysiological study excluding significant AV conduction disturbances.     

Pacing therapy in the elderly

Bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular block is more commonly observed in the elderly. Aging is associated with progressive fibrosis in both the sinus node and atrioventricular conduction system (AV node, His bundle, right and left bundles). In the absence of reversible causes implantation of a permanent pacemaker is often required in the patient with symptomatic bradycardia. For elderly patients with sinus node dysfunction, pacing modes that preserve atrioventricular synchrony are associated with a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation and improved quality of life. For patients with atrioventricular block, the importance of preserving atrioventricular synchrony in the elderly is controversial and is currently being evaluated.     

Noninvasive assessment of pacemaker hemodynamics by Doppler echocardiography: importance of left atrial size

The relative decrease in cardiac output with ventricular pacing versus "physiologic" modes was measured noninvasively using Doppler echocardiography in 26 patients. Standard echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular size (diastolic diameter), left ventricular function (shortening fraction) and left atrial size were examined to determine which of these variables might best identify patients more likely to benefit from maintenance of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. Decreases in relative cardiac output, expressed as reduction in the Doppler-derived flow velocity integral, with loss of AV synchrony ranged from 0 to 43% (mean decrease 21%). There was no correlation between left ventricular size or function and effect of pacing mode on relative cardiac output. There was, however, correlation between left atrial size and sensitivity to pacing mode. Patients with normal left atrial size were significantly more sensitive to loss of AV synchrony. In this subgroup, the decrease in flow velocity integral with ventricular pacing was 32 +/- 11% compared with only 11 +/- 13% in patients with left atrial enlargement. Thus, Doppler echocardiography is useful in assessing optimal pacing mode in the individual patient. Echocardiographically measured left atrial size may identify patients in whom physiologic pacing may be major benefit.     

Ventricular stimulation triggered by esophageal atriogram: a new technique of temporary physiologic stimulation in the course of acute myocardial infarct complicated by atrioventricular block and low cardiac output]

Advanced atrio-ventricular (AV) block during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is considered a complicating dysrhythmia as the well as mechanism responsible for occurrence of life-threatening hemodynamic changes. Often, simple VVI pacing can result insufficient in improving the decreased cardiac output. VDD pacing, which preserves atrial contribution, should represent the most effective electrical approach; therefore, it requires intracavitary placement of 2 catheters. In 10 pts (6M, 4F, mean age of 63.8 +/- 6.6 years) with advanced AV block due to AMI (4 inferior, 6 anterior) and without sinus node dysfunction, we performed stable VDD stimulation (mean 16.6 +/- 20.6 hours) using only one catheter positioned in the right ventricle while the atrial impulse, filtered (50-70 Hz) and amplified through a special device, was derived from the esophagus. Such technique is rapid and reliable, avoiding problems associated with atrial sensing and catheterization.     

Safety and effectiveness of single-lead VDD pacing

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Single-lead VDD pacing provides the physiological benefits of atrioventricular synchrony with the convenience of a single-lead system. However, concern remains about the method's safety and effectiveness. METHOD: In total, 700 patients with single-lead VDD pacemakers were evaluated retrospectively. The following parameters were recorded: age, sex, etiology, the symptoms and electrocardiographic diagnosis that justified pacemaker implantation, the venous access route used for implantation, atrial sensing at implantation, atrial undersensing at follow-up, the occurrence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, and final pacing mode. RESULTS: Third-degree atrioventricular block was the main indication for pacemaker implantation (66.4%). The most commonly used venous access route was via the right cephalic vein (49.1%). At implantation, the mean atrial signal was 1.8 (4 1.15) mV. During follow-up, significant atrial undersensing occurred in 7.7% of patients; in 1.9%, it could not be corrected by device reprogramming. Uncontrollable supraventricular arrhythmias were observed in 6.4% of patients. Symptomatic sinus node disease was rare. By the end of follow-up, 91.4% of patients were still on VDD pacing, while, in 8.3%, the pacemaker had to be reprogrammed to the VVI mode. Only 0.3% required atrial lead implantation for DDD pacing. Left-side venous access during implantation was a independent predictora of atrial undersensing at follow-up. Low values of atrial detection at implant did not reach statistical signification although it showed a remarkable trend. CONCLUSIONS: Single-lead VDD pacing seems to be safe and effective when appropriately indicated. Our findings are consistent with those of previously published studies.     

Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography

To assess the hemodynamic effects of physiologic pacing, 13 patients with DDD pacemakers who had varying degrees of atrioventricular (AV) block were studied with radionuclide ventriculography during VVI, DVI and VDD modes. Radionuclide ventriculography was performed with patient in the supine position at rest 5 to 10 minutes after the pacing mode and AV delay were changed. The AV delays selected were short (mean 147 +/- 4.8 ms) and long (mean 197 +/- 4.8 ms), with a constant difference of 50 ms. During VVI, 6 patients (group 1) had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less (mean 22 +/- 11) and 7 patients (group 2) had an ejection fraction of more than 40% (mean 59 +/- 11). Comparisons of ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume and cardiac index between VVI and both modes of AV pacing (VDD and DVI) and between long and short AV delays led to the following conclusions: DVI or VDD pacing produces more beneficial hemodynamic effects than VVI, and these effects are more pronounced in patients with low ejection fraction if longer AV delay is used. The VDD mode significantly improves ventricular function over the DVI mode in patients with an ejection fraction of more than 40% independent of heart rate. Longer AV delay is essential in patients with an ejection fraction of 40% or less to improve ventricular function with physiologic pacing.     

Antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic properties of diazepam demonstrated by electrophysiological study in humans

We evaluated the electrophysiological parameters before and after the intravenous infusion of diazepam (0.2 mg/kg) in 20 cardiac patients to investigate the drug's antiarrhythmic effect. Diazepam did not significantly change the arterial pressure. After the intravenous infusion of diazepam, the sinus cycle length significantly shortened from 847 +/- 132 to 747 +/- 155 ms (p less than 0.01). No significant change in the maximal sinus node recovery time was noted. The AH interval at the atrial pacing length of 600 ms shortened significantly from 140 +/- 40 to 127 +/- 39 ms (p less than 0.05). However, there was no significant change after the administration of diazepam in the longest atrial pacing rate associated with Wenckebach conduction in the atrioventricular (AV) node, effective and functional refractory periods of the AV node, HV interval, and QRS width during ventricular pacing at the cycle length of 600 ms. The atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods remained unchanged after the administration of diazepam. Six of the eight patients who showed dual AV nodal refractory period curves in the control study did not demonstrate them after diazepam administration by increasing the atrial or AV node effective refractory period. Thus, diazepam showed significant electrophysiological effects of the heart including shortening of the sinus cycle length, improvement in AV node conduction, and no significant effect on the His-Purkinje or intraventricular conduction and refractoriness of the atrium, AV node and ventricle. On the other hand, diazepam may influence the inducibility of supraventricular reentrant tachycardia incorporating the AV node.