Subtle changes in benign tissue adjacent to prostate neoplasia detected with a Bayesian belief network

The aim of this paper was to test the usefulness of a Bayesian belief network (BBN) as a decision support system in the uncertainty assessment of benign prostatic tissue, either associated or not with inflammation or adjacent to prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). A shallow network was used with eight first-level descendant nodes for the diagnostic clues, each independently linked by a conditional probability matrix to a root node containing the diagnostic alternatives. One diagnostic evidence node was based on the tissue architecture and the others were based on cell features. The efficacy of the network was tested on a series of 45 simple prostatectomy specimens, subdivided as follows: benign prostatic tissue not associated with other diseases (15 cases), associated with acute and/or chronic inflammation (15 cases), and adjacent to accidentally discovered PAC or PIN (15 cases). The highest belief values for the diagnostic alternative normal prostate (NP) were obtained in the 15 cases not associated with other diseases, the mean value being 0·996. The 15 cases evaluated in areas with inflammation showed the lowest belief values for NP (mean 0·774). For the 15 cases evaluated in specimens with PAC or PIN, the belief values for NP were intermediate between those from normal prostatic tissue associated with inflammation and those not associated (mean 0·925). Moreover, it was found that subtle changes were also present at a certain distance from the tumour. In conclusion, the network can be used as a decision support system to differentiate with high certainty benign prostate adjacent to PAC or PIN from benign prostatic tissue either associated or not with inflammation. The subtle morphological alterations detected with the BBN may be considered malignancy-associated changes. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the one well-documented precursor to adenocarcinoma of the prostate. This review article defines both low- and high-grade PIN. Unusual variants of high-grade PIN are illustrated. Benign lesions that may be confused with high-grade PIN, including central zone histology, clear cell cribriform hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia are described and illustrated. High-grade PIN is also differentiated from invasive acinar (usual) and ductal adenocarcinoma. The incidence of high-grade PIN, its relationship to carcinoma (including molecular findings), and risk of cancer on rebiopsy are covered in detail. Finally, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, a controversial entity, is discussed and differentiated from high-grade PIN.     

My approach to intraductal lesions of the prostate gland

The morphologically heterogeneous (intra)ductal lesions of the prostate frequently present a diagnostic challenge, particularly when found within prostate needle biopsies. By current convention, all high-grade intra-acinar and intraductal neoplastic lesions of prostatic origin fall under the diagnostic umbrella term: prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm (PIN). Although a long-standing contentious issue, some lesions currently adhering to the diagnostic criteria of PIN may actually represent the intraductal spread of (generally high grade) invasive cancer. Illustrating this fact, the well-described ductal subtype of prostatic adenocarcinoma is frequently associated with conventional-type acinar adenocarcinoma, and has a tendency to propagate within adjacent intact prostatic ducts. Clearly, the misdiagnosis of lesions representing invasive disease as preinvasive has the potential for unfavourable clinical sequelae. As yet, however, many of these lesions have escaped the establishment of reliable morphologic criteria or immunohistochemical differentiation for diagnosis. By defining stringent architectural and cytonuclear features specific for each of these lesions, it may be feasible to separate potentially sinister lesions from the subset of traditional (preinvasive) PIN lesions with limited clinical urgency. This review discusses the (intra)ductal lesions of the prostate, along with their differential diagnoses. Given the current state of knowledge, a pragmatic approach to their effective reporting is outlined, taking into consideration the clinical implications, as well as current guidelines for treatment and follow-up.     

Silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions in the differentiation of prostatic hyperplasia, intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma.

Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) are loops of chromosomal DNA that ultimately direct the development of the nucleolus. These NORs are associated with argyrophilic acidic nonhistone proteins which have allowed the demonstration of NORs by a simple silver stain. This staining technique has been used to examine the number of silver-stained NORs (AgNORs) in malignant and benign conditions, and, in general, AgNOR numbers are increased in malignant tissues when compared with normal or benign conditions. More recently, this technique has been applied to premalignant lesions with varying results. We applied this silver stain to prostate lesions where nucleolar features are of diagnostic importance. The stain was applied to ten cases of prostatic hyperplasia, ten cases each of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) grades 1 through 3, and ten cases each of low grade, intermediate grade, and high grade adenocarcinoma. The counting was performed by image analysis. A significant mean difference did exist between low grade and the two higher grades of adenocarcinoma. There was no significant difference in AgNOR counts per nucleus in hyperplasia, PIN, or adenocarcinoma or between the three grades of PIN. The AgNOR silver stain is not useful in the differentiation of hyperplasia, the three grades of PIN, and adenocarcinoma. Also because of overlap among the three grades of adenocarcinoma, it is not useful in the differentiation of these lesions.     

Overexpression of Pim-1 during progression of prostatic adenocarcinoma

AIMS: Pim-1 is a serine/threonine kinase that has been shown to play an integral role in the development of a number of human cancers, such as haematolymphoid malignancies. Recently, evidence has shown Pim-1 to be important in prostatic carcinogenesis. In order to further our understanding of its role in prostate cancer, we investigated Pim-1 expression in normal, premalignant, and malignant prostate tissue. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, Pim-1 expression was analysed in prostate tissue from 120 radical prostatectomy specimens. In each case, Pim-1 staining was evaluated in benign prostatic epithelium, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and prostatic adenocarcinoma. The number of positively staining cells was estimated, and the intensity of staining was scored on a scale of 0 to 3+. RESULTS: Pim-1 immunoreactivity was identified in 120 cases (100%) of adenocarcinoma, 120 cases (100%) of high grade PIN, and 62 cases (52%) of benign glands. The number of cells staining in benign epithelium (mean 34%) was much lower than that in high grade PIN (mean 80%; p<0.0001) or adenocarcinoma (mean, 84%; p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between high grade PIN and adenocarcinoma in the percentage of cells staining positively for Pim-1 (p = 0.34). The staining intensity for Pim-1 was significantly lower in benign prostatic epithelium than in PIN and adenocarcinoma (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between the level of Pim-1 expression and Gleason score, patient age, tumour stage, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, surgical margin status, extraprostatic extension, or seminal vesicle invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Pim-1 expression is elevated in PIN and prostatic adenocarcinoma compared with benign prostatic epithelium. This finding suggests that upregulation of Pim-1 may play a role in prostatic neoplasia.     

The utility of Ki-67 expression in the differential diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and ductal adenocarcinoma

Cribriform and/or papillary prostatic lesions observed on limited tissue, such as needle biopsy, can pose diagnostic dilemmas. One such area of difficulty is the distinction between papillary and/or cribriform prostatic high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PIN) and ductal adenocarcinoma. Over 48 months, we identified 17 cases of ductal adenocarcinoma and 17 cases of HG-PIN from radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. The HG-PIN lesions were in all cases associated with an acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma component. For each case, we evaluated the proliferative activity, assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. The majority (82%) of ductal adenocarcinomas were composed of mixed papillary and cribriform patterns, with the remaining demonstrating pure papillary or cribriform patterns. The HG-PIN lesions showed a papillary, cribriform, or mixed papillary/cribriform architecture. The proliferative activity, defined as Ki-67 labeling index, was statistically higher in ductal adenocarcinoma (mean 33%, range 21%-66%) as compared with HG-PIN (mean 6%, range 2%-15%), with no overlap in the Ki-67 indices (P = 0001). A combination of histological features and measurements of cellular proliferation may be helpful to distinguish HG-PIN from ductal adenocarcinoma in limited prostatic tissue samples.     

前列腺特异性膜抗原在前列腺癌中的表达及临床意义

目的 研究前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)在前列腺癌中的表达及其与Gleason分级之间的关系,同时探讨其在前列腺癌诊断中的价值.方法 采用免疫组化EnVision法检测PSMA在前列腺癌、前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)和良性前列腺增生症(BPH)中的表达.结果 PSMA在BPH、PIN和前列腺癌中均表达.在BPH中,PSMA阳性表达部位在前列腺腔缘或顶端/胞质表达,而在PIN中表达模式为胞质伴胞膜阳性,前列腺癌为顶端/胞质、胞质伴胞膜阳性或胞质表达阳性.PSMA在分化差前列腺癌中多为胞质表达,而在分化好的癌中为顶端/胞质和胞质伴胞膜表达.PSMA表达强度在PIN和前列腺癌中明显高于BPH(P＜0.05),同时PSMA染色强度与Gleason评分呈正相关(P＜0.05).结论 PSMA与Gleason分级密切相关,PSMA表达模式和染色强度的改变对PIN和前列腺癌诊断具有参考价值.     

Occurrence of cell death (apoptosis) in prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia

The aim of our study was to assess the frequency and location of apoptotic bodies (ABs) in haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) and then to compare the patterns with those in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic invasive adenocarcinoma (PAC). ABs were identified in all epithelial cell layers of the ducts, acini and tumour islands, as well as in the lumina contained in such structures. In the epithelial cell layers, ABs were found in general in the intercellular space and occasionally in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells. The frequency of ABs increased from BPH through PIN up to PAC. The proportions of ABs in PIN lesions of low grade (PINlow) and high grade (PINhigh) were greater than in BPH, the values decreasing from the nuclei in the basal position towards those in the luminal layer. In PINlow, the mean category values were 0.85% (standard error, SE, 0.311%) in the basal, 0.623% (SE 0.065%) in the intermediate and 0.474% (SE 0.138%) in the luminal position. In PINhigh, the mean category values were 1.006% (SE 0.16%) in the basal position, 0.713% (SE 0.182%) in the intermediate and 0.618% (SE 0.172%) in the luminal position. The proportions of ABs in adenocarcinoma with cribriform pattern decreased from the basal towards the luminal layer, as for PIN: 1.806% (SE 0.346%) in the basal position, 1.15% (SE 0.172%) in the intermediate and 0.886% (SE 0.137%) in the luminal position. In the solid/trabecular adenocarcinomas, the mean category value in the cell layer adjacent to the stroma was 2.154% (SE 0.203%), whereas in the other cell layers it was 2.052% (SE 0.239%). In small and large acinar adenocarcinomas, the proportions of positive nuclei were 1.022% (SE 0.1%) and 0.922% (SE 0.163%), respectively. The evaluation of the frequency and location of ABs gives accurate information on cell death in PIN in comparison with BPH and PAC.     

Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia: Expression and location of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in epithelial,endothelial and stromal nuclei

The expression and location of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunostaining in epithelial, endothelial and stromal nuclei were assessed in prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN). It was then compared with patterns in benign lesions and in invasive adenocarcinomas of the prostate. The PCNA-positive nuclei showed homogeneous or granular types of staining, or a mixture of both, and a gradation in the intensity of staining. Nuclei with granular and mixed patterns appeared lighter brown than those with a homogeneous pattern, which were darker and more often noted in PIN and invasive adenocarcinomas than in benign lesions. For epithelial PCNA-stained nuclei, the proportions in the two grades of PIN were greater than in benign prostatic hyperplasia (mean 3.16%, SE 0.31%) and prostatic atrophic ducts and acini (mean 0.56%, SE 0.09%), the values decreasing from the nuclei in the basal position towards those in the luminal layer. In grade 1, the category mean values were 9.51% (SE 1.14%) in the basal, 7.02% (SE 1.27%) in the intermediate and 6.02% (SE 0.90%) in the luminal position. In grade 2, the category mean values were 13.81% (SE 1.42%) in the basal position, 10.99% (SE 1.17%) in the intermediate and 7.91% (SE 1.43%) in the luminal position. In small and large acinar adenocarcinomas, the proportions of positive nuclei were 8.66% (SE 0.30%) and 9.06% (SE 0.30%), respectively. The category mean values in the cribriform adenocarcinomas were 14.40% (SE 0.61%) in the basal position, 11.84% (SE 1.30%) in the intermediate and 9.26% (SE 0.66%) in the luminal position. As in PIN, the proportions of immunostained nuclei in the adenocarcinoma with cribriform pattern decreased from the basal towards the luminal layer. In the solid/trabecular adenocarcinomas, the category mean value in the cell layer adjacent to the stroma was 17.60% (SE 2.92%), whereas in the other cell layers it was lower than that in the cells adjacent the stroma (mean 13.88%, SE 1.71%). For capillary endothelial and stromal cells, the percentages of PCNA-stained nuclei were much lower than those in the epithelial component. The lowest mean values were obtained in benign lesions, whereas the highest were in invasive adenocarcinomas, the percentages in PIN being intermediate.This paper was read in part at the Workshop on Chemoprevention of Premalignant and Early Malignant Lesions of the Prostate, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 27–29 March, 1992     

Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organization state between cribriform and flat high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

This digital texture analysis-based study evaluates the chromatin organization state in flat and cribriform high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), in the adjacent normal looking secretory epithelium and in the co-occurring adenocarcinoma. Digital texture analysis (karyometry) was carried out on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from 24 radical prostatectomy specimens with high-grade PIN (12 with flat and 12 with cribriform architectural pattern, respectively) and cancer. Quantification was also conducted on the normal looking secretory epithelium. Discriminant analysis and the nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index were used to identify suitable subsets of features useful for the discrimination and classification of pathological groups and to explore multivariate data structure in the pathological subgroups. The average nuclear abnormality increases monotonically from the histologically normal appearing secretory epithelium to high-grade PIN and to adenocarcinoma. The nuclei from the so-called perimeter compartment of the flat high-grade PIN lesions show a higher nuclear abnormality compared to the nuclei of the cribriform high-grade PINs. Discriminant analysis shows that flat and cribriform high-grade PINs fall into two populations. Processing by the nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index revealed the existence of three well-defined, distinct subpopulations of nuclei of different chromatin phenotype. In the flat high-grade PIN lesions the proportions of nuclei in the three subpopulations are 16.5% (low abnormality), 25.0% (mid abnormality) and 58.5% (high abnormality), respectively. In the cribriform high-grade PIN lesions, 100% of the nuclei are in the mid-abnormality subpopulation. These differences are also discernible in the co-occurring adenocarcinoma and the histologically normal appearing secretory epithelium. To conclude, karyometry and statistical analysis detect the existence of distinct cell subpopulations of different chromatin packaging and phenotype, with the nuclei from the flat high-grade PIN lesions, adjacent normal looking epithelium and co-occurring adenocarcinoma expressing a greater nuclear abnormality than in the specimens with cribriform high-grade PIN.     

Atypical acinar proliferations of the prostate

Small acinar lesions of the prostate may mimic prostate cancer. In the central and transition zone of the prostate, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) must be differentiated from low grade carcinoma (Gleason score 2-5). In the dorso-peripheral zone, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and atypical small acinar proliferations (ASAP) are the most important lesions mimicking carcinoma. Further differentiation is necessary between high grade PIN and intraductal carcinoma. ASAP, on the other hand, may mimic low grade carcinoma. The significance of basal cell type cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the differentiation between ASAP and low grade carcinoma of the prostate was substantiated by additional MIB-1 IHC. The status of the basal cell layer in ASAP was found to be variable (complete, fragmented and absent). Independent of the status of the basal cell layer, the mean MIB-1 proliferation index of ASAP was significantly higher than that of clearly benign lesions and did not differ from that of low grade carcinoma. As carcinoma is frequently detected in rebiopsies, close clinical follow up of patients with ASAP is advisable.     

Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cribriform architecture has worse prognostic features than non-cribriform-type

Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a rare histologic subtype of prostate cancer characterized by large glands lined with tall columnar pseudostratified epithelium. PDA has several architectural patterns, with papillary and cribriform being the most common. The cribriform pattern of acinar carcinoma has shown to be associated with a worse prognosis in terms of disease progression and disease-specific mortality. However, the significance of cribriform pattern in PDA is unknown. In this study, we sought to compare the adverse pathologic features between cribriform-type and non-cribriform-type PDA, and between PDA and acinar carcinoma with Gleason scores 8–10. We identified PDA cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 and 428 radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens containing Gleason 8–10 acinar carcinoma. The slides of all PDA cases were reviewed, and pathologic features were recorded. We found that the vast majority of PDA contained admixed acinar carcinoma, with a median percentage of the ductal component of 50% (range 5–100). 29% of PDA was graded as Grade Group 4 and 35.5% as Grade Group 5. At the time of RP, 45.2% of cases presented as pathologic stage T3a and 29% as T3b. Cribriform-type PDA demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood of extraprostatic extension (84% vs 33.3%, p = 0.01), seminal vesical invasion (36% vs 0%, p = 0.04), lymphovascular invasion (40% vs 0%, p = 0.03) and advanced pathologic stage (84% vs 33.3%, p = 0.01) compared to PDA without cribriform architecture. The proportion of stage ≥pT3 tumors in PDA was similar compared to that in Gleason 8–10 acinar carcinoma (74.2% vs 70.8%, p = 0.68).     

Central zone histology of the prostate: a mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

The central zone (CZ) is located at the base of the prostate adjacent to the seminal vesicles. Its histology as a potential mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) has not been formally studied. Three groups were evaluated. Group 1 comprised 30 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens assessed for the extent of CZ and of Roman arch and/or cribriform formation in the CZ. Group 2 comprised 100 consecutive cases of nonconsult prostate needle biopsies, screened in a random blinded fashion to identify CZ histology and the specificity of its identification on biopsy. Group 3 comprised 34 consult cases (1984 to the present) with CZ histology on needle biopsy. For group 1, the average maximum diameter of CZ histology was 5 mm. Two cases (6.7%) did not contain the classic features of CZ histology. The average amount of cribriform and/or Roman arch formation in the areas with CZ histology was 16.5%. In group 2, 10% of prostate needle biopsy cases had CZ histology. Of these, 80% were located on biopsy specimens designated as the base of the prostate, 10% were located in the base and midportion of the prostate, and 10% were located in the midportion of the prostate. For group 3, CZ histology occupied on average 32% of the involved core. The 2 most common histologic features were eosinophilic cytoplasm (97%) and location at the end of a core (97%). Other features were Roman arch formation (59%), a prominent basal cell layer (32%), cribriform formation (26%), and associated thick muscle bundles typical of bladder neck (24%). On average, cribriform and/or Roman arch formation occupied 22% of the CZ area seen on biopsy. Twenty-six of the consult cases were sent in with preliminary outside diagnoses. Of these, 21 (81%) were either PIN or atypical: 11 (42%) high-grade PIN, 7 (27%) PIN, and 3 (12%) atypical glands. Our findings show that CZ histology is distinctive, as seen in radical prostatectomy specimens. Less frequently it is found on needle biopsy, where the presence of Roman arch and/or cribriform formation mimics PIN. Recognition of the distinctive features of CZ histology (i.e., tall columnar cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, prominent basal cell layer, and lack of cytologic atypia) can help avoid a misdiagnosis of PIN or "atypia" on needle biopsy.     

Mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate as a mimicker of colonic adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

A 59-year-old man presented with persistent urinary obstructive symptoms, gross hematuria, and mucusuria. Subsequently, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-negative mucin-producing urothelial type adenocarcinoma of prostate was found. The serum PSA level was within the normal limit. Colonoscopy, positron emission tomography, and other tumor surveys showed this to be the only prostate lesion. Microscopically, there was an adenocarcinoma with copious mucin production, with the formation of mucin pools. The neoplastic glands were variously arranged in cribriform, glandular, and villous adenoma-like patterns. This is a very rare tumor, of which there are only 20 cases reported in the literature in the English language. It is critical to distinguish it from mucinous acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate and from metastatic adenocarcinoma of either the bladder or colon. This is mainly because mucin-producing urothelial type adenocarcinoma of the prostate has a different clinical behavior, and hence, the treatment plan is different from that for conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Specifically, it has a more aggressive clinical course and is unresponsive to hormone therapy.     

Immunohistochemical analysis of bcl-2, bax, bcl-X, and mcl-1 expression in prostate cancers.

Proteins encoded by bcl-2 family genes are important regulators of programmed cell death and apoptosis. Alterations in the expression of these apoptosis-regulating genes can contribute to the origins of cancer, as well as adversely influence tumor responses to chemo- and radiotherapy. Using antibodies specific for the Bcl-2, Bax, Bcl-X, and Mcl-1 proteins in combination with immunohistochemical methods, we examined for the first time the expression of these bcl-2 family genes in 64 cases of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, including 10 Gleason grade 2 to 4 tumors, 21 grade 5 to 7 tumors, 17 grade 8 to 10 tumors, 8 lymph node metastases, and 8 bone metastases. In addition, 24 cases of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) or PIN coexisting with carcinoma were also evaluated. All immunostaining results were scored with regard to approximate percentage of positive tumor cells and relative immunostaining intensity. Expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 was present in 16 of 64 (25%) adenocarcinomas and tended to be more frequent in high grade tumors (Gleason grade 8 to 10; 41%) and nodal metastases (38%) than in lower grade (Gleason 2 to 7) primary tumors (16%; P < 0.05). Bcl-X was expressed in all 64 (100%) tumors evaluated. Bcl-X immunointensity was generally stronger in high grade primary tumors (grade 8 to 10) and metastases compared with PIN and low grade neoplasms (P < 0.0001). In addition, the proportion of specimens with > 50% Bcl-X-immunopositive tumor cells also was higher in advanced grade primary tumors (Gleason 8 to 10) and metastases than in PIN and low grade tumors (Gleason 2 to 7; P < 0.005). The anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 was expressed in 52 of 64 (81%) tumors, compared with only 9 of 24 (38%) cases of PIN (P < 0.001). In addition, the percentage of Mcl-1-positive cells was typically higher in Gleason grade 8 to 10 tumors and metastases than in PIN or lower grade tumors (P = 0.025). In contrast, the pro-apoptotic protein Bax was expressed in all prostate cancers evaluated, with high percentages of immunopositive cells and strong immunointensity typically occurring regardless of tumor grade. The findings suggest that expression of several anti-apoptotic members of the bcl-2 gene family, including bcl-2, bcl-X, and mcl-1 increases during progression of prostate cancers, a finding that may be relevant to the hormone-insensitive, metastatic phenotype of most advanced adenocarcinomas of the prostate.     

Precursors of prostate cancer

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the only accepted precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma, according to numerous studies of animal models and man; other proposed precursors include atrophy and malignancy-associated changes (with no morphologic changes). PIN is characterized by progressive abnormalities of phenotype and genotype that are intermediate between benign prostatic epithelium and cancer, indicating impairment of cell differentiation and regulatory control with advancing stages of prostatic carcinogenesis. The only method of detection of PIN is biopsy because it does not significantly elevate serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and cannot be detected by ultrasonography. The mean incidence of PIN in biopsies is 9% (range, 4%-16%), representing about 115,000 new cases of isolated PIN diagnosed each year in the United States. The clinical importance of PIN is its high predictive value as a marker for adenocarcinoma, and its identification warrants repeat biopsy for concurrent or subsequent carcinoma, especially when multifocal or observed in association with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). Carcinoma develops in most patients with PIN within 10 years. Androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy decrease the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that these forms of treatment may play a role in prevention of subsequent cancer. Multiple clinical trials to date of men with PIN have had modest success in delaying or preventing subsequent cancer.     

前列腺癌及前列腺上皮内瘤6号染色体等位基因杂合子丢失分析

目的：检测原发性前列腺癌及高级别前列腺上皮内瘤（PIN）6号染色体等位基因杂合子丢失（LOH）及其意义。方法：经显微切割技术切获取前列腺癌及PIN各10例患者DNA,采用聚合酶链反应（PCR）及微卫星多态性技术,对6号染色体上的20个微卫星标志位点LOH进行检测。结果：10例原发性前列腺中有8例在6号染色上至少有1个位点检测到LOH,6p21-6q23及6q25-6q27为2个高频LOH区,10例高级别PIN检测6号染色体20个位点,有5例各有1个位点检测到LOH,结论：前列腺癌中存在6号染色体的高频LOH区,分别位于6q21-6q23,6q25-6q27区,编码细胞周期素C及胰岛素样生长因子Ⅱ受体的基因为此2区侯选的抑癌基因,它们可能与前列腺癌的发生发展有关。     

Atypical sclerosing adenosis of the prostate: a rare mimic of adenocarcinoma

Cheng L & Bostwick D G
(2010) Histopathology 56 , 627–631 Atypical sclerosing adenosis of the prostate: a rare mimic of adenocarcinoma Aims: Sclerosing adenosis of the prostate is a benign, small, acinar proliferation in dense spindle cell stroma, with a distinct immunohistochemical profiles. It is incidentally found in about 2% of transurethral resection specimens. The aim was to describe cases with significant cytological atypia mimicking cancer, which have not been previously reported. Methods and results: We describe five cases of sclerosing adenosis with significant cytological atypia, referred to as atypical sclerosing adenosis (ASA), which were initially considered suspicious or diagnostic of adenocarcinoma. Seven other cases of typical sclerosing adenosis were used as controls. All cases of typical and atypical sclerosing adenosis displayed an intact basal cell layer, which was immunoreactive for high‐molecular‐weight keratin, S100 protein, smooth muscle actin, and prostate‐specific antigen, with no differences between ASA and the control group. Alpha‐methylacyl‐coenzyme A racemase was negative. Three of four cases of ASA had aneuploid DNA content by digital image analysis. All cases of typical sclerosing adenosis were diploid. During a mean follow‐up of 33 months (range 5–73 months), none developed recurrence or prostatic cancer. Conclusions: ASA is an unusual small, acinar proliferation of the prostate that may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma, and should be distinguished from other mimics, including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, mesonephric remnant hyperplasia, and post‐atrophic hyperplasia. ASA is a benign lesion and aggressive treatment is unwarranted.