Long-term results of intraoperative presacral electron boost radiotherapy (IOERT) in combination with total mesorectal excision (TME) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the long-term results of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer using a multimodal approach consisting of total mesorectal excision (TME), intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy (IOERT), and pre- or postoperative chemoradiation (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 2003, 210 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (65 International Union Against Cancer [UICC] Stage II, 116 UICC Stage III, and 29 UICC Stage IV cancers) were treated with TME, IOERT, and preoperative or postoperative CHT. A total of 122 patients were treated postoperatively; 88 patients preoperatively. Preoperative or postoperative fluoropyrimidine-based CRT was applied in 93% of these patients. RESULTS: Median age was 61 years (range, 26-81). Median follow-up was 61 months. The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control rate (LC), and distant relapse free survival (DRS) of all patients was 69%, 66%, 93%, and 67%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that UICC stage and resection status were the most important independent prognostic factors for OS, DFS, and DRS. The resection status was the only significant factor for local control. T-stage, tumor localization, type of resection, and type of chemotherapy had no significant impact on OS, DFS, DRS, and LC. Acute and late complications > or =Grade 3 were seen in 17% and 13% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multimodality treatment with TME and IOERT boost in combination with moderate dose pre- or postoperative CRT is feasible and results in excellent long-term local control rates in patients with intermediate to high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer

Aims

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer.

Methods

From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a curative ASR and were enrolled in a database. The postoperative complication rates, predictive factors on oncological outcome and survival rates were registered.

Results

Seventy-two patients with LRRC (mean age 63; 44 male, 28 female) and 14 patients with LARC (mean age 65; 6 male, 8 female) underwent ASR. R0 resection was achieved in 37 patients with LRRC and 11 patients with LARC. Twenty-seven patients underwent an R1 resection (3 in the LARC group). Eight patients had an R2 resection, compared to no patients in the LARC group. In respectively 26 and 1 patients of the LRRC and LARC groups a grade 3 or 4 complication occurred and the 30-days mortality rate was respectively 3% and 7%. The 5-years overall survival was 28% and 24% respectively.

Conclusion

En bloc radical resection remains the primary goal in the treatment of dorsally located (recurrent) rectal cancer. After thorough patient selection, ASR is a safe procedure to perform, shows acceptable morbidity rates and leads to a good oncological outcome.     

New standard in locally advanced rectal cancer

In the following review we intend to ascertain the optimal neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. In 2004, a study revealed that chemoradiotherapy (CRT) resulted in better local control when performed preoperatively rather than postoperatively, thus neoadjuvant treatment was established as a standard treatment. Subsequently, the Polish study and the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group showed no statistically significant difference between concomitant CRT over 5 wk vs short-course radiotherapy (RT). Therefore, both were established as standard neoadjuvant treatments. Later, the Stockholm III study demonstrated that short-course RT had a higher complete pathological response than long-course RT. It also showed that a delay between RT and surgery presented fewer complications. This opened a window of time to provide an early and effective systemic treatment to prevent distant metastases. Studies show that short-course RT plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could achieve this. When comparing this total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) vs concomitant CRT, the former showed greater complete pathological response and lower acute toxicity. Studies presented during 2020 have also shown the benefits of TNT in terms of complete pathological response, as well as disease and metastasis-free survival. Our review suggests that probably TNT should be the new standard treatment for these patients. However, we will have to wait for the full text publications of these studies to confirm this statement.     

Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure

BACKGROUNDFor locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), standard therapy [consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT)] achieves excellent local control. Unfortunately, survival is still poor due to distant metastases, which remains the leading cause of death among these patients. In recent years, the concept of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has been developed, whereby all systemic ChT-mainly affecting micrometastases-is applied prior to surgery.AIMTo compare standard therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure.METHODSIn a retrospective study, we compared LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure who were treated with standard therapy or with TNT. High-risk for failure was defined according to the presence of at least one of the following factors: T4 stage; N2 stage; positive mesorectal fascia; extramural vascular invasion; positive lateral lymph node. TNT consisted of 12 wk of induction ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, CRT with capecitabine, and 6-8 wk of consolidation ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). In total, 72 patients treated with standard therapy and 89 patients treated with TNT were included in the analysis.RESULTSCompared to standard therapy, TNT showed a higher proportion of pCR (23% vs 7%; P = 0.01), a lower neoadjuvant rectal score (median: 8.43 vs 14.98; P < 0.05), higher T-and N-downstaging (70% and 94% vs 51% and 86%), equivalent R0 resection (95% vs 93%), shorter time to stoma closure (mean: 20 vs 33 wk; P < 0.05), higher compliance during systemic ChT (completed all cycles 87% vs 76%; P < 0.05), lower proportion of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 during ChT (3% vs 14%, P < 0.05), and equivalent acute toxicity and compliance during CRT and in the postoperative period. The pCR rate in patients treated with TNT was significantly higher in patients irradiated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy than with 3D conformal radiotherapy (32% vs 9%; P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONCompared to standard therapy, TNT provides better outcome for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure, in terms of pCR and neoadjuvant rectal score.     

Development of an irradiation method of intraoperative radiation therapy for curatively resected rectal cancer

Background. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been performed to prevent local recurrence of rectal cancer only when positive margins are suspected. To further reduce local recurrence, we attempted to develop a new IORT irradiation method in which electron beam irradiation is administered as uniformly as possible to the intrapelvic dissection surfaces. Methods. Low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection were performed in one male and one female cadaver. Electron beam irradiation was administered by four different methods, and absorbed doses were measured at 15 sites within the pelvis. We also attempted to measure absorbed doses at nine sites within the pelvis in 14 patients treated with IORT. Results. The cadaver study revealed low absorbed doses in the lateral walls of the pelvis when a single irradiation was delivered from the anterior. When the lateral walls of the pelvis were irradiated twice, once each time on the right and left, the absorbed doses were low in the central pelvis and presacrum. Relatively high absorbed doses were achieved in all of these areas by a technique that combined these two methods. Adequate absorbed doses were not achieved by a single irradiation administered from the perineum. Conclusion. This study suggests that electron beam irradiation administered three times to the dissected surfaces in the pelvis after resection of rectal cancer (i.e., to the central pelvis and presacrum from the anterior, and to the left and right lateral walls of the pelvis) is the most suitable method for achieving adequate absorbed doses. Received: May 6, 1998 / Accepted: December 15, 1998     

Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer in the elderly

Background

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is a radical approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) in case of tumour invasion into the urogenitary tract. The aim of this study is to assess surgical and oncological outcomes of TPE for LARC and LRRC in elderly patients compared to younger patients.

Impact of radiotherapy boost on pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after preoperative (chemo)radiation with doses of ⩾60 Gy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Complete response is relevant since this could select a proportion of patients for which organ-preserving strategies might be possible. Furthermore, we investigated correlations between EQD2 dose and pCR-rate, toxicity or resectability, and additionally between pCR-rate and chemotherapy, boost-approach or surgical-interval.Methods and materialsPubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries were searched with the terms ‘radiotherapy’, ‘boost’ and ‘rectal cancer’ and synonym terms. Studies delivering a preoperative dose of ⩾60 Gy were eligible for inclusion. Original English full texts that allowed intention-to-treat pCR-rate calculation were included. Study variables, including pCR, acute grade ⩾3 toxicity and resectability-rate, were extracted by two authors independently. Eligibility for meta-analysis was assessed by critical appraisal. Heterogeneity and pooled estimates were calculated for all three outcomes. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the variables mentioned earlier.ResultsThe search identified 3377 original articles, of which 18 met our inclusion criteria (1106 patients). Fourteen studies were included for meta-analysis (487 patients treated with ⩾60 Gy). pCR-rate ranged between 0.0% and 44.4%. Toxicity ranged between 1.3% and 43.8% and resectability-rate between 34.0% and 100%. Pooled pCR-rate was 20.4% (95% CI 16.8–24.5%), with low heterogeneity (I² 0.0%, 95% CI 0.00–84.0%). Pooled acute grade ⩾3 toxicity was 10.3% (95% CI 5.4–18.6%) and pooled resectability-rate was 89.5% (95% CI 78.2–95.3%).ConclusionDose escalation above 60 Gy for locally advanced rectal cancer results in high pCR-rates and acceptable early toxicity. This observation needs to be further investigated within larger randomized controlled phase 3 trials in the future.     

TAI联合放射治疗晚期直肠癌的临床研究

目的探讨经直肠下动脉介入化疗(TAI)方案联合放射治疗晚期直肠癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法回顾分析68例晚期直肠癌的随访资料,根据治疗方法不同分为TAI联合放射治疗组和单纯放疗组,分析肿瘤的缓解率、患者的生存率及毒副反应。结果TAI方案联合放疗组在肿瘤的消失、缩小方面优于单纯放疗组,两者差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。TAI组联合放疗组1、2、3年的生存率明显高于单纯放疗组,两者有显著性差异(P<0.05);5年生存率相近,但TAI组联合放疗组较单纯放疗组消化道I~II度毒副反应发生率明显增加,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论TAI方案联合放射治疗能提高局控率,降低复发率,减少局部淋巴和远处转移率,有效提高长期生存率,且并发症发生率较低,是一种简单、安全、较理想的中晚期直肠癌的治疗方案,有临床推广价值。     

三维适形放疗联合化疗治疗局部晚期和术后复发性直肠癌

目的：探讨局部晚期和术后复发性直肠癌三维适形放射治疗（3D—CR）联合化疗的临床疗效。方法：30例局部晚期和术后复发性直肠癌采用常规放射治疗至40Gy，再予后程适形放疗加化疗。适形放疗25Gy-30Gy，肿瘤总量65Gy-70Gy；化疗采用奥沙利铂130mg／m^2，d1，亚叶酸钙100mg／m^2，d1-5,5-氟脲嘧啶500mg／m^2，d1-5。结果：患者有效率为90％；12、24、36月生存率分别为83．3％，60％，40％；12、24、36月局部控制率分别为90％，83．3％，56．7％。胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制、放射性直肠炎、放射性膀胱炎为主要副反应，多为1—2级。结论：三维适形放疗联合化疗可提高局部晚期和术后复发性直肠癌的控制率和生存率。     

Role of radiation therapy in neoadjuvant era in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Surgery remains the primary determinant of cure in patients with localized rectal cancer, and total mesorectal excision is now widely accepted as standard of care. The widespread implementation of neoadjuvant shortcourse radiotherapy (RT) or long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has reduced local recurrence rates from 25% to 40% to less than 10%; Preoperative RT in resectable rectal cancer has a number of potential advantages, most importantly reducing local recurrence, and down-staging effect. In this article making a comprehensive literature review searching the reliable medical data bases of PubMed and Cochrane we present all available information on the role of radiation therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in preoperative setting of rectal cancer. Data reported show that in locally advanced rectal cancer the addition of radiation therapy or CRT pre surgically has significantly improved sphincter prevention surgery. Moreover, the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy in preoperative setting has significantly improved pathologic complete response rate and loco-regional control rate without improvement in sphincter preserving surgery. Finally, the results of recently published randomized trials have shown a significant improvement of prevs postoperative CRT on local control; however, there was no effect on overall survival.     

局部晚期胰腺癌75 Gy同步加量放射治疗的剂量可行性研究

背景与目的：近年来,胰腺癌的发病率逐年上升,调强放射治疗(intensity-modulated radiotherapy,IMRT)已被广泛应用于胰腺癌的治疗,但多数胰腺癌IMRT的剂量学研究的处方剂量都小于60 Gy。本研究旨在探究局部晚期胰腺癌(locally advanced pancreatic cancer,LAPC)患者75 Gy同步加量放射治疗的剂量可行性并比较共面IMRT(coplanar IMRT,CO-IMRT)与非共面IMRT(non-coplanar IMRT,NC-IMRT)技术的剂量学差异。方法：纳入复旦大学附属肿瘤医院2018年1月—2021年12月收治的符合入组标准的10例接受同步加量放射治疗的LAPC患者,处方剂量为50 Gy的计划靶区(planning target volume,PTV),记为PTV_{50 Gy},处方剂量为75 Gy同步加量的PTV,记为PTV_{75 Gy},靶区照射分次均为25次。为每例患者分别设计CO-IMRT和NC-IMRT计划。同1例患者两种计划的射野数、处方剂量和危及器官(organ...     

Long-term results of full-dose gemcitabine with radiation therapy compared to 5-fluorouracil with radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreas cancer

Purpose

To retrospectively compare the efficacy and toxicity of full-dose gemcitabine based chemoradiotherapy (GemRT) versus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemoradiotherapy (5FURT) for locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC).

Methods

From January 1998 to December 2008, 93 patients with LAPC were treated either with 5FURT (n = 38) or GemRT (n = 55). 5FURT consisted of standard-field radiotherapy given concurrently with infusional 5-FU or capecitabine. GemRT consisted of involved-field radiotherapy given concurrently with full-dose gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² weekly) with or without erlotinib. The follow-up time was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the date of death or last contact.

Results

Patient characteristics were not significantly different between treatment groups. The overall survival (OS) was significantly better for GemRT compared to 5FURT (median 12.5 months versus 10.2 months; 51% versus 34% at 1 year; 12% versus 0% at 3 years; 7% versus 0% at 5 years, respectively; all P = 0.04). The OS benefit of GemRT was maintained on subset analysis without concurrent erlotinib or with sequential gemcitabine (all P < 0.05). The rates of distant metastasis, subsequent hospitalization, acute and late grade 3-5 gastrointestinal toxicities were not significantly different between the GemRT and 5FURT groups.

Conclusions

GemRT was associated with an improved OS compared to standard 5FURT. This approach yielded long-term survivors and was not associated with increased hospitalization or severe gastrointestinal toxicity.     

Long-term results after intraoperative radiation therapy for gastric cancer

PURPOSE: We retrospectively analyzed the impact of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) on long-term survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1991 to 2001, a total of 84 patients with gastric neoplasms underwent gastectomy or subtotal resection with IORT (23 Gy, 6-15 MeV; IORT-positive [IORT(+)] group). Patients with a history of additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy, histologically confirmed R1 or R2 resection, or reoperation with curative intention after local recurrence were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 61 patients were retrospectively matched with 61 patients without IORT (IORT-negative [IORT(-)] group) for Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage, patient age, histologic grading, extent of surgery, and level of lymph node dissection. Subgroups included postoperative UICC Stages I (n = 31), II (n = 11), III (n = 14), and IV (n = 5). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 4.8 years in the IORT(+) group and 5.0 years in the IORT(-) group. The overall 5-year patient survival rate was 58% in the IORT(+) group vs. 59% in the IORT(-) group (p = 0.99). Subgroup analysis showed no impact of IORT on 5-year patient survival for those with UICC Stages I/II (76% vs. 80%; p = 0.87) and III/IV (21% vs. 14%, IORT(+) vs. IORT(-) group; p = 0.30). Perioperative mortality rates were 4.9% and 4.9% in the IORT(+) vs. IORT(-) group. Total surgical complications were more common in the IORT(+) than IORT(-) group (44.3% vs. 19.7%; p < 0.05). The locoregional tumor recurrence rate was 9.8% in the IORT(+) group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IORT was associated with low locoregional tumor recurrence, but had no benefit on long-term survival while significantly increasing surgical morbidity in patients with curable gastric cancer.     

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDIn recent years, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been increasingly used for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of IORT for the treatment of rectal cancer are still controversial.AIMTo evaluate the value of IORT for patients with rectal cancer.METHODSWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and conference abstracts and included randomized controlled trials and observational studies on IORT vs non-IORT for rectal cancer. Dichotomous variables were evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), hazard ratio (HR) and 95%CI was used as a summary statistic of survival outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software.RESULTSIn this study, 3 randomized controlled studies and 12 observational studies were included with a total of 1460 patients, who are mainly residents of Europe, the United States, and Asia. Our results did not show significant differences in 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.60-1.06; P = 0.126); 5-year disease-free survival (HR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.73-1.22; P = 0.650); abscess (OR = 1.10, 95%CI = 0.67-1.80; P = 0.713), fistulae (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.33-1.89; P = 0.600); wound complication (OR = 1.21, 95%CI = 0.62-2.36; P = 0.575); anastomotic leakage (OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.59-2.02; P = 0.775); and neurogenic bladder dysfunction (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.31-1.55; P = 0.369). However, the meta-analysis of 5-year local control was significantly different (OR = 3.07, 95%CI = 1.66-5.66; P = 0.000).CONCLUSIONThe advantage of IORT is mainly reflected in 5-year local control, but it is not statistically significant for 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and complications.     

Nucleic acid-based markers of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

The progress that has been made in the treatment of rectal cancer has mostly resulted from multimodality strategy approach that combines surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), surgery remains the primary treatment, while neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is used to downsize or downstage the tumor before surgical resection. Highly variable response to nCRT observed in LARC patients raises the need for biomarkers to enable prediction and evaluation of treatment response in a more efficient and timely manner than currently available tools. The search for predictive biomarkers continues beyond blood proteins, which have failed in subsequent validation studies. This review presents nucleic acids-based markers and their predictive potential in LARC patients. Most of the candidate biomarkers come from relatively small single-institution studies. The only candidate biomarker that emerged as relevant in more than a single study was elevated levels of Fusobacterium nucleatum nucleic acids in tumor tissue. Considering that this marker is easily accessible through non-invasive analysis of faecal samples, its predictive potential is worth further validation. The other candidate nucleic acid-based biomarkers require more consistent studies on larger cohorts before they can be considered for use in clinical setting.     

Updated systematic review of the approach to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer

ObjectivesTo review the evidence regarding surgical advances in the management of primary locally advanced rectal cancer.BackgroundThe management of rectal cancer has evolved significantly in recent decades, with improved (neo)adjuvant treatment strategies and enhanced perioperative protocols. Centralization of care for complex, advanced cases has enabled surgeons in these units to undertake more ambitious surgical procedures.MethodsA Pubmed, Ovid, Embase and Cochrane database search was conducted according to the predetermined search strategy. The review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021245582).Results14 studies were identified which reported on the outcomes of 3,188 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration (PE) for primary rectal cancer. 50% of patients had neoadjuvant radiotherapy. 24.2% underwent flap reconstruction, 9.4% required a bony resection and 34 patients underwent a major vascular excision. 73.9% achieved R0 resection, with 33.1% experiencing a major complication. Median length of hospital stay ranged from 13 to 19 days. 1.6% of patients died within 30 days of their operation. Five-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged 29%–78%.LimitationsThe studies included in our review were mostly single-centre observational studies published prior to the introduction of modern neoadjuvant treatment regimens. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis on the basis that most were non-randomized, non-comparative studies.ConclusionsPelvic exenteration offers patients with locally advanced rectal cancer the chance of long-term survival with acceptable levels of morbidity. Increased experience facilitates more radical procedures, with the introduction of new platforms and/or reconstructive options.     

The evolving treatment paradigm of locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review

Background and ObjectiveSurgery is still considered the mainstay of treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Nevertheless, “curable” disease may still pose a great risk for both local and distant relapses. Since the early eighties of the past century, we have witnessed mounting evidence supporting the multi-modality approach to tackle this disease effectively. The multi-modality approach is variable between different positive trials. In this review, we discuss the treatment evolution of LARC, highlighting the key differences between the different contemporary strategies utilized. Based on current evidence, we sought to define distinct patient subgroups and to propose a treatment algorithm that best fits patient’s risk.MethodsWe conducted a literature search through PubMed and Google scholar. Eligible papers were phase 2/3 trials [in organ preservation (OP), observational and retrospective studies were also acceptable] published in English. We used keywords such as “locally advanced rectal cancer”, “perioperative therapy in rectal cancer”, “short course radiotherapy”, “chemoradiation in rectal cancer”, “interval to surgery”, “Neoadjuvant therapy”, “Organ preservation” and “Total neoadjuvant treatment [TNT]”.Key Content and FindingsVarious trials consistently demonstrated the benefit of preoperative radiotherapy in LARC, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial based on published studies, TNT was associated with a risk reduction in distant metastasis, and more reassuring evidence is accumulating regarding OP.ConclusionsThe treatment landscape of LARC is rapidly changing. Clinicians should carefully tailor treatment strategy based on patient’s risk.