High-dose melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma

Since 1983 an increasing number of clinical trials have used high-dose melphalan with or without autologous stem cell support in patients with multiple myeloma. It has been shown that high-dose therapy including high-dose melphalan may be considered as the treatment of choice in newly diagnosed patients. The purpose of this report is to review and summarize the clinical information on IV high-dose melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma and to examine potential areas of future investigation.     

m-BACOD treatment for intermediate- and high-grade malignant lymphomas: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial.

One hundred six eligible patients with advanced intermediate- or high-grade malignant lymphoma were treated with methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (m-BACOD) in a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial. Patients were stratified by estimated bone marrow reserve, and impaired marrow reserve patients received reduced doses of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. The complete remission rate for normal marrow reserve patients was 65%, while the complete remission rate for impaired marrow reserve patients was 29%. With a median follow-up period of 41 months, 64% of complete responders in the normal marrow group are disease-free 3 years after their response. Three-year survival is 61% in the normal marrow reserve group and is 29% in the impaired marrow reserve group. Eighty-seven percent of treatment courses were given in accordance with protocol dosing and schedule. For doxorubicin, relative dose intensities were 0.75 and 0.61 (normal and impaired marrow reserve arms, respectively), for cyclophosphamide, 0.76 and 0.61, and for methotrexate, 0.55 and 0.45. Serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level was the only pretreatment characteristic found to have a significant effect on overall survival. Severe or greater toxicity occurred in 97% and 89% of the normal and impaired marrow reserve groups, respectively, with granulocytopenia the principal toxicity. Treatment-related fatalities occurred in 8% of patients. m-BACOD is an effective but toxic treatment program for intermediate- and high-grade malignant lymphomas.     

Improved survival duration with combination chemotherapy induction for multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study

Four hundred forty previously untreated patients with active multiple myeloma were entered into a randomized trial (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] study 7927/28) comparing vincristine, melphalan, Cytoxan (Mead Johnson & Company, Evansville, Ind), and prednisone (VMCP) alternating with vincristine, BCNU, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) and prednisone (VBAP) with or without levamisole with vincristine, Cytoxan, and prednisone (VCP) with or without levamisole for induction therapy. The treatment groups were well balanced for all of the known major prognostic factors. Patients receiving VMCP-VBAP responded (greater than or equal to 75% regression) more frequently to induction therapy, both without (54%) and with (44%) levamisole v VCP without (28%) or with (28%) levamisole (P less than .001). In addition, patients receiving VMCP-VBAP (+/- levamisole) had a survival duration determined to be significantly increased by all forms of analysis: 48 and 33 months for VMCP-VBAP without and with levamisole v 29 and 26 months for VCP without and with levamisole (P = .011 overall). Levamisole did not improve response rates or survival duration (P greater than or equal to .1), nor did it prolong remission in the maintenance phase (P = .85). Analysis of SWOG study 7704/05 (updated April 1985) confirmed improved survival for combination therapy v MP, but no benefit for levamisole. The overall findings support the use of VMCP-VBAP as an excellent treatment option for remission induction in patients with active myeloma of all stages and prognostic categories.     

Extended follow-up of a phase II trial in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma:: final time-to-event results from the SUMMIT trial

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib, a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, has shown clinical activity in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma in a pivotal Phase II trial, SUMMIT. METHODS: Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by a 10-day rest period for up to 8 cycles. Dexamethasone 20 mg on the day of and the day after bortezomib was permitted for suboptimal response. Extended treatment beyond 8 cycles was offered to patients whose physicians felt they would benefit from additional therapy. Follow-up was conducted in all patients for a median of 23 months, an additional 13 months from the original report. RESULTS: Of 202 patients enrolled in SUMMIT, 193 were evaluable for response. Seven (4%) patients achieved a complete response, 12 (6%) achieved a nearly complete response, 34 (18%) achieved a partial response, and 14 (7%) had a minimal response while on bortezomib. The updated median duration of response to bortezomib alone was 12.7 months. The median overall time to progression for all SUMMIT patients was 7 months. For responding patients, the median time to progression was 13.9 months, whereas for those with progressive disease (PD) or who were not evaluable, the median time to progression was 1.3 months. The median overall survival (OS) for all SUMMIT patients was 17.0 months. Whereas the median OS for patients with PD or who were not evaluable was 8 months, the median OS for responding patients was not reached at 23 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that treatment with bortezomib results in meaningful long-term benefit for patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma.     

Southwest Oncology Group phase II study of arsenic trioxide in patients with refractory germ cell malignancies

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, no satisfactory therapy is available for patients with refractory germ cell neoplasms. The activity and safety of arsenic trioxide in refractory germ cell tumors was assessed. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with arsenic trioxide at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day and administered intravenously over 1 to 2 hours on Days 1-5 and repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: There were no complete or partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 1 month and the median overall survival was 2 months. Three patients died as a result of adverse events believed to be possibly related to treatment: ventricular arrhythmia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, arsenic trioxide in the dose regimen and schedule employed was found to have no activity in men with refractory germ cell malignancies. Treatment was associated with severe toxicity. Dismal overall survival reflects the poor outcome in this patient group and highlights the acute need for new agents with activity in refractory germ cell neoplasms.     

m-AMSA in refractory lymphoma. A phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

m-AMSA (4'-[9'-acridinylamino]-methansulfon-m-anisidide) is an acridine derivative which has shown a wide spectrum of activity in preclinical testing. The mechanism of action is thought to be via interference with synthesis and integrity of DNA chains by intercalation between base pairs and external binding. Initial phase I clinical trials revealed granulocytopenia to be the dose limiting toxicity with occasional thrombocytopenia. Phlebitis, liver function abnormalities, and cardiac abnormalities have also been noted. Early reports suggested activity in leukemia and lymphoma. Based on these results ECOG evaluated m-AMSA in a phase II trial of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.     

A multicenter phase II trial of thalidomide and celecoxib for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Preclinical data indicates that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition impairs plasma cell growth and potentially synergizes with thalidomide. We performed a trial in previously treated patients with myeloma using thalidomide up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/d with celecoxib (400 mg bid). Outcomes were compared with a prior trial of thalidomide. Sixty-six patients with median age of 67 (range, 43-85) received a median dose of thalidomide and celecoxib of 400 and 800 mg/d, respectively, with median durations of treatment of 27 and 13 weeks, respectively. The most common toxicities associated with premature discontinuation of celecoxib (n = 30 of 53, 57%) were fluid retention and deterioration of renal function. Overall response rate (RR) was 42% and with 20 months median follow-up; the actuarial median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.8 and 21.4 months, respectively. Unlike our prior study, age >65 years was not predictive of inferior RR due to improvement in RR in older patients with the combination (37% versus 15%, P = 0.08). The RR was superior in patients who received a total dose of celecoxib exceeding 40 g in the first 8 weeks of therapy (62% versus 30%, P = 0.021). Progression-free survival and overall survival were also improved. Other predictors for inferior progression-free survival were age >65 years (P = 0.016) and elevated beta(2)-microglobulin (P = 0.017). This study provides evidence that the addition of high-dose celecoxib adds to the antimyeloma activity of thalidomide but this comes with unacceptable toxicity. Future studies should use newer COX-2 inhibitors with thalidomide, or their respective derivatives.     

Evaluation of docetaxel in previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial.

PURPOSE: This phase II multi-institutional trial of the Southwest Oncology Group was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer were entered onto the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion repeated every 21 days, with protocol-specified dose reductions for toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were eligible. A total of 158 cycles of docetaxel were administered (median, three cycles; range, one to nine). Ten patients (23%) (95% confidence interval, 12% to 39%) achieved partial responses. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 3 and 9 months, respectively. Therapy was generally well tolerated. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 58% of patients. Febrile neutropenia developed in five patients (12%), and infection was documented in 14% of patients. There was one treatment-related death caused by pneumonia in a patient who had developed bilateral pneumothoraces. Other toxicities (grade 3/4) included malaise, fatigue, and lethargy (21%); nausea (19%); stomatitis (14%); edema (9%); and sensory neuropathy (9%). DISCUSSION: Docetaxel, at a dose of 100 mg/m2, is an active agent in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Reversible neutropenia is the most common toxicity associated with this treatment. The overall survival (9 months) with this agent is comparable to that reported with other new chemotherapeutic agents in small cell lung cancer and warrants additional evaluation of docetaxel in combination therapy.     

Expanded phase II trial of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study

Background. The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients. The design was motivated by a report from FDA and NCI staff proposing assessment of pre- and post-treatment symptoms as a means of evaluating treatment effectiveness [1]. Methods. Patients with symptomatic and/or measurable metastatic breast cancer with prior treatment received paclitaxel 210 mg/m2 as a 3 hour infusion every three weeks until toxicity or progression. A unique endpoint was subjective symptomatic response, defined as an improvement in the Symptom Distress Scale score by 3 points at two successive evaluations before treatment failure. Patients were also evaluated for objective response and toxicity. Results. Of 135 patients registered, 123 were eligible and treated. The subjective symptomatic response rate for 93 symptomatic patients who completed forms was 40%, 95% confidence interval 29–51%. The objective response rate in 77 patients with measurable disease was 19%, 95% confidence interval 11–30%. In patients with both measurable and symptomatic disease, 37% had symptomatic and 13% had objective responses. Median times to treatment failure and death were 4 and 11 months, respectively. Toxicity was greater than anticipated: 12% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, 29% developed at least one Grade 3 neuromuscular toxicity, and two patients died of sepsis while neutropenic. Conclusion. Paclitaxel by 3 hour infusion at a dose of 210 mg/m2 produced excessive neurotoxicity in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Both sustained subjective symptom reduction and objective responses were demonstrated, but dose reduction for routine practice is recommended.     

A phase II trial of combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

A prospective Phase II trial of combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors was conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group. The therapy included 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and streptozotocin (FAC-S) or the same combination without Adriamycin (FC-S) in patients with heart disease. Seventy-four patients were entered and two were ineligible. Sixty-nine of the 72 were histologically reviewed. Six patients were declared ineligible after this review. Fifty-six patients received FAC-S, and nine received FC-S (one patient was inevaluable). The response rates were 31% and 22%, respectively. The median survival of all patients was 10.8 months. The analyses of various clinical and histologic parameters indicated that responses were more common in patients with gastrintestinal carcinoids; there was also a tendency toward shorter survival in patients with tumors that had a higher mitotic rate or the atypical and/or undifferentiated histologic pattern. The FAC-S combination can produce objective responses in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors, but these are generally partial and brief. It was also concluded that currently available chemotherapy is inadequate.     

High-dose cyclophosphamide. An effective treatment for advanced refractory multiple myeloma

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group evaluated cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously daily X 4 (total dose each cycle 2400 mg/m2) as an aggressive approach to the treatment of patients with advanced multiple myeloma. The overall objective response rate is 43%. This includes a 38% response rate for all previously treated patients and a 29% response rate for patients refractory to prior therapy with cyclophosphamide. The objective response duration was 3 months and the survival of responding patients 9 months. A subjective response rate of 63% was observed, characterized by effective pain relief and improved performance. Sixty-nine percent of patients experienced leukocyte cell nadirs less than 500/mm2 with a mean time to marrow recovery of 17 days. Thrombocytopenia was less severe but required platelet transfusion in 43% of patients. Bone marrow toxicity was encountered in all patients, and death in aplasia is a significant risk. Strict adherence to entry criteria, and a systematic plan for hospitalization for antibiotic and blood component support is required for treatment with this regimen.     

Adjuvant CMFVP versus melphalan for operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes: 10-year results of a Southwest Oncology Group Study

Four hundred forty-one women with operable breast cancer with histologically positive axillary nodes were randomized to receive either combination cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m2 orally everyday for 1 year); fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] weekly for 1 year); methotrexate (15 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year); vincristine (0.625 mg/m2 IV for 10 weeks); prednisone (30 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, 20 mg/m2 days 15 to 28, 10 mg/m2 days 29 to 42) (CMFVP) or single-agent melphalan (L-PAM) (5 mg/m2 orally every day for 5 days every 6 weeks for 2 years) chemotherapy after a modified or radical mastectomy between January 1975 and February 1978. Patients were stratified according to menopausal status and number of positive nodes (one to three, more than three nodes) before randomization. Seventy-eight patients were ineligible, most (56) because they were registered more than 42 days from surgery. Maximum duration of follow-up is 12 years, with a median of 9.8 years. The treatment arms were balanced with respect to age, menopausal status, and number of positive nodes. Among eligible patients, disease-free survival and survival were superior with CMFVP (P = .002, .005, respectively). At 10 years, 48% of patients treated with CMFVP remain alive and disease-free and 56% remain alive, compared with 35% alive and disease-free and 43% alive on the L-PAM arm. Disease-free survival and survival were significantly better with CMFVP compared with L-PAM only in premenopausal patients and patients with four or more positive nodes. Both regimens were well tolerated, although toxicity was more severe and more frequent with CMFVP. We conclude that after 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant combination chemotherapy with CMFVP is superior to single-agent L-PAM in patients with axillary node-positive primary breast cancer. The major advantage is in premenopausal women and in patients with more than three positive axillary nodes.     

Alternating combination chemotherapy and levamisole improves survival in multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study

Previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma were entered on a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the use of alternating combination chemotherapy, including vincristine, doxorubicin, alkylating agents, and prednisone (160 patients) was more effective than conventional chemotherapy with melphalan and prednisone (77 patients), and whether the addition of the immunomodulating agent levamisole to maintenance chemotherapy enhanced the survival of patients achieving remission. The treatment groups were well matched for all major factors. The more aggressive chemotherapy was more effective at inducing remission, with a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving at least 75% tumor mass regression (53% with alternating combinations versus 32% with melphalan-prednisone, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the median survival was increased to 43 months with alternating combination chemotherapy as compared to 23 months with melphalan-prednisone (p = 0.004). After six to 12 months of induction therapy, 84 patients achieving remission were rerandomized to receive maintenance chemotherapy alone or with the addition of levamisole. The survival from the start of maintenance therapy was longer in patients receiving the added levamisole than with chemotherapy alone (p = 0.01). These findings support the use of aggressive multiagent chemotherapy for remission induction in patients with advanced-stage multiple myeloma.     

A phase II trial with gemcitabine and paclitaxel for the treatment of refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease with a 10-year survival of <20%. We have previously shown that the combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel acts synergistically to induce apoptosis of myeloma cells in vitro. Based on these preclinical studies and phase I-II clinical trials in patients with solid tumors, we initiated a phase II clinical trial of paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) IV over 3 h followed by gemcitabine 3000 mg/m(2) IV over 30-60 min in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. This regimen was administered every two weeks for a total of six cycles. Twelve patients enrolled, 3 discontinued treatment after 1 or 2 cycles because of severe neutropenia. As a result the protocol was modified to reduce the starting dose of gemcitabine to 2,000 mg/m(2). This resulted in tolerable hematological and mild non-hematological toxicities in the rest of the patients. One patient died before the onset of treatment. Of the 8 remaining patients treated with a reduced dose of gemcitabine, 1 achieved a durable CR, 3 had PR, 1 had minor response (MR), 1 had stable disease and 2 had progressive disease. The CR patient had a 98% reduction in the M-protein, beta2-microglobulin and plasma cells. His CR continued for more than 6 months. The 3 PR patients had a >50% reduction in the M-protein and >40% reduction in beta2-microglobulin. Bone marrow plasma cells were reduced by >50% in these patients. Treatment with the combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.     

A phase II trial of vinblastine in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

Forty-one patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma no longer amenable to control with surgery and/or radiotherapy were entered into study. Five of these were ineligible for study. One eligible patient never received any treatment, another had no baseline information recorded; these were thus inevaluable. The remaining 34 patients received continuous infusion vinblastine (1.5 mg/m2) as a 24-h infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. One complete and 3 partial responses were observed among these 34 patients, for an overall objective response rate of 12%. Two of these 4 responders are deceased, and 2 remain alive with disease at 18 and 22 months, respectively. The most common toxicity noted was leukopenia in 22 patients (65%); 12 (35%) of these had severe or life-threatening leukopenia (less than 2,000 WBC/microliter). Fourteen of the 34 (41%) experienced nausea and vomiting. Other adverse effects were less common. Overall, 15 of the 34 patients (44%) experienced severe or life-threatening toxicity. In this trial, continuous infusion vinblastine was toxic and had minimal to moderate efficacy at best. These facts suggest that the drug at the dose and schedule tested has no role in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.     

Ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results

The all-oral combination of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (ICD) is well tolerated and effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We carried out MUKeight, a randomised, controlled, open, parallel group, multi-centre phase II trial in patients with relapsed MM after prior treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and a proteasome inhibitor (ISRCTN58227268), with the primary objective to test whether ICD has improved clinical activity compared to cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CD) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Between January 2016 and December 2018, 112 participants were randomised between ICD (n = 58) and CD (n = 54) in 33 UK centres. Patients had a median age of 70 years and had received a median of four prior lines of therapy. 74% were classed as frail. Median PFS in the ICD arm was 5.6 months, compared to 6.7 months with CD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21, 80% CI 0.9–1.6, p = 0.3634). Response rates and overall survival were not significantly different between ICD and CD. Dose modifications or omissions, and serious adverse events (SAEs), occurred more often in the ICD arm. In summary, the addition of ixazomib to cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone did not improve outcomes in the comparatively frail patients enroled in the MUKeight trial.Subject terms: Drug development, Cancer therapy, Cancer therapy