Prevalence of hepatitis C virus and genotype distribution in an Australian volunteer blood donor population

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody and RNA in first-time blood donors and to examine the HCV genotype distribution. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to screen 34,725 donors for HCV antibodies. Donors who were repeatably reactive were tested in two immunoblot assays-a second-generation and a third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-as well as by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. PCR-positive donors were genotyped. All samples were screened for alanine aminotransferase levels. RESULTS: The ELISA repeat reactivity rate was 0.55 percent. PCR testing showed that 69 (38%) of the 183 ELISA-reactive samples contained HCV RNA. The third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay identified all 69 viremic samples as antibody positive; however, only 63 tested positive on the second-generation immunoblot. The remaining six PCR-positive donors tested antibody-indeterminate to the core peptide. All six of these donors had HCV subtype 3a infections. Genotype distribution among 58 samples showed that 34 were type 1, of which 22 could be further subtyped as 1a (16) and 1b (6); 2 were 2a; 5 were 2b; and 17 were subtyped as 3a. Donors infected with 2b and 3a had reduced antibody reactivity to the NS4 and NS3 peptides only on the second-generation immunoblot. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of confirmed anti-HCV and viral RNA in new donors is 0.29 and 0.2 percent, respectively. The third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay was more sensitive than the second-generation immunoblot assay in detecting 2b and 3a HCV subtypes. The inclusion of the NS5 peptide in the third- generation recombinant immunoblot did not result in positive tests in any additional donors. Rather, the improvement was due to the increased detection of NS3 and, to a lesser extent, NS4 antibodies. Subtypes 1a and 3a were most prevalent in this population.     

Hepatitis C virus among blood donors: follow-up study

BACKGROUND: The exact significance of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in blood donors remains unknown. Confirmatory tests of anti-HCV- reactive serum and HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are used to refute a large proportion of false-positive results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ninety-two blood donors who were anti-HCV reactive in a first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were reevaluated 10 months later with a second-generation ELISA (ELISA-2) as well as with second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and by PCR. RESULTS: Twenty-five (43.9%) of the 57 ELISA-2-positive donors were confirmed as positive by RIBA-2; of these, 84 percent were HCV RNA positive in PCR. Of the 57 who were still anti-HCV positive, 46 were followed up and tested again in the same manner 2 years after the first screening. At that time, the pattern was little changed: 94 percent of RIBA-2- and PCR-positive donors remained positive. Of RIBA-2- and PCR-positive blood donors, 62 percent had abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels in at least one of the three evaluations. Among the anti-HCV-positive donors confirmed by RIBA-2, 60 percent, versus 12.6 percent in the control group, had a significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent risk factor for HCV infection, due to parenteral exposure to blood. CONCLUSION: These data confirm a good correlation between RIBA-2 reactivity and the detection of HCV RNA in a population of anti-HCV- positive blood donors.     

Neopterin levels during the early phase of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND: A study was conducted to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of neopterin screening of blood donors with regard to the detection of window-phase specimens of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 1002 diagnostic window-phase specimens from 98 seroconversion panels (29 HIV-1, 52 HCV, and 17 HBV) were analyzed with viral antigen detection, viral nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT), and neopterin quantitation assays. The study was completed by the analysis of 92 anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-reactive and 103 alanine aminotransferase (ALT)-elevated blood donor specimens. RESULTS: A significant association between elevated neopterin concentrations and the very early phase of HIV-1 infection was found. No significant correlation could be observed between neopterin levels and the early phase of HCV or HBV infection. Neopterin concentration was not increased in specimens from blood donors with anti-HBc reactivity or ALT elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Neopterin screening of blood donors may identify window-phase cases of HIV, but not of HCV or HBV infection. The diagnostic sensitivity of neopterin screening during the HIV window phase is similar to that of the p24 antigen test. With the introduction of viral NATs in blood screening, there is no additional benefit of neopterin screening with regard to the three blood-borne viruses HIV, HCV, and HBV. Acute phases of other infectious agents, however, have been reported to be detected by neopterin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.     

High prevalence of cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma samples of blood donors in connection with seroconversion

BACKGROUND: Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is considered to latently infect blood cells. Transfusion-transmitted infection (TT-CMV) of immunocompromised patients occurs despite the use of CMV-seronegative or leukoreduced units. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The prevalence of CMV DNA in plasma was investigated in 82 blood donors who had previously been seronegative for CMV and showed anti-CMV immunoglobulin G for the first time, 598 blood donors who were seropositive for at least 1 year, and 150 seronegative blood donors. In a second part of the study, the overall prevalence of CMV DNA in blood donations was assessed based on 31,745 donations. RESULTS: CMV DNA was repeatedly detected in plasma samples of 44 percent of newly seropositive donors (12%-62%, depending on the interval to the last seronegative donation). All steadily seropositive or seronegative donors were negative for the presence of CMV DNA. Detection of CMV DNA in connection with seroconversion was accompanied by significantly increased neopterin, increased alanine aminotransferase, and reduced white blood cell counts, but the sensitivity of these surrogate markers was only 71 percent. The overall prevalence of CMV DNA in blood products due to primary CMV infection of donors was at least 0.13 percent. CONCLUSION: Viremia of newly seropositive donors may be an important reason for the residual risk of TT-CMV despite leukoreduction. Furthermore, transfusion of WBC-reduced blood components from seronegative donors could imply a greater risk of TT-CMV than transfusion of WBC-reduced blood from donors who have been seropositive for at least 1 year, because window-phase donations but no reactivation could be detected in this study.     

Evaluation of indeterminate c22-3 reactivity in volunteer blood donors

Background: Approximately 25 percent of blood donor sera that are repeatably reactive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) on second-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA 2.0) are indeterminate on second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0), and over 76 percent of these results are due to single reactivity to the HCV recombinant antigen c22- 3. Study Design and Methods: Data are presented on 46 volunteer allogeneic blood donors who were reactive on EIA2.0 and c22-3 indeterminate in RIBA 2.0. Index and follow-up samples were evaluated by using a panel of five synthetic peptide EIAs, a prototype strip immunoblot assay that uses synthetic peptides in addition to recombinant protein (RIBA 3.0), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HCV RNA. Results: All 46 donations had normal alanine aminotransferase values; only 2 (4.3%) reacted for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. With a panel of 12 synthetic peptides spanning the entire sequence of the c22-3 recombinant antigen, 33 plasmas (72%) reacted to one peptide or none, including 19 plasmas with reactivity restricted entirely to the N-terminal peptide (1–15 amino acids) of c22-3. With RIBA 3.0, 28 donations (61%) were nonreactive, including 25 that reacted with one peptide or none in EIA. Of these 25 plasmas, 18 reacted with the N- terminal sequence only. All 46 index donations were tested by PCR; the single PCR-positive unit reacted with four HCV peptides, was positive by RIBA 3.0, and reacted for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Twenty-six index donors were successfully recalled 3 to 7 months after their index donation. None seroconverted to positivity in RIBA 2.0, 1 was nonreactive, and 25 remained positive for c22-3 only. The restricted epitope reactivity in peptide EIA and RIBA 3.0 was maintained over time in all cases. All 26 of the follow-up samples tested negative by PCR. Conclusion: On the basis of the restricted peptide reactivity and PCR negativity of index and follow-up samples, it is concluded that the majority of c22-3 RIBA 2.0-indeterminate results are due to nonspecific cross-reactivity to restricted (principally, N-terminal) regions of HCV core antigen.     

Comparative evaluation of supplemental hepatitis C virus antibody test systems

Implementation of routine blood donor screening using anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) has resulted in an urgent need for well-characterized supplemental assays to confirm the presence of HCV antibodies. A comparative study of four commercially available supplemental assays is reported here: first- and second-generation versions of a strip recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-1 and RIBA-2), an HCV neutralization EIA, and HCV neutralization plus synthetic peptide EIA. Three hundred sixty-seven blood donor specimens that were repeatedly reactive on HCV EIA were studied. Most specimens (93%) were also evaluated by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with a six-antigen panel, and 60 selected specimens were tested for HCV RNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RIBA-1 and RIBA-2 gave concordant results with 86 percent of specimens, while an additional 13 percent were correctly classified by RIBA-2 but not RIBA-1. Neutralization EIA alone correctly identified 94 percent of the study group, while the remaining 6 percent required the peptide EIA or the combined neutralization-peptide assay system for correct classification. The RIBA-2 and neutralization-peptide assay system for correct classification. The RIBA-2 and neutralization-peptide assay systems yielded identical results for 86 percent of specimens, and these results were supported by RIA and selected PCR testing. Only 2 specimens (0.5%) were frankly discrepant, while 51 specimens were indeterminate on either (47) or both (4) assays. When either the RIBA-2 or neutralization-peptide assay yielded an indeterminate interpretation, the other system correctly classified the specimen (based on concordance with RIA and PCR data) in a high proportion (92%) of cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparison of two supplemental procedures for confirmation of antibody to hepatitis C virus c100-3 antigen in Louisiana blood donors

In a pilot study designed to evaluate the performance of supplemental hepatitis C virus (HCV) tests, 146 consecutive HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-reactive samples (0.98% of 14,949 donors) were comparatively evaluated with two sets of supplemental tests: HCV antibody neutralization/c100-3 peptide EIA and the first-generation HCV recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). Of these samples, 68.5 percent were positive and 17.8 percent were negative on both supplemental assays. Nineteen samples were discordant. Eleven samples were positive on one assay (9 on neutralization/peptide, 2 on RIBA) and negative or indeterminate on the alternate supplemental test, but reacted with two additional HCV antigens outside the c100-3 region in a second-generation dot immunoblot assay. The dot immunoblot assay was used as a reference and reactive samples were considered confirmed. The remaining eight discordant samples were indeterminate or negative on either assay and did not react on the dot immunoblot assay. These data indicate a 0.74-percent prevalence of HCV exposure detected by reactivity with the c100-3 antigen in blood donors in southern Louisiana.     

Long-term follow-up of and infectivity in blood donors with hepatitis C antibodies and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in blood donors with HCV antibodies and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-nine anti-HCV-positive donors with normal ALT on four determinations at 3-month intervals were further tested monthly for 6 months, and they had normal ALT values. The presence of HCV RNA was determined in these 39 donors. RESULTS: Serum HCV RNA was detected in 16 of 39 donors, 14 of 14 who reacted on second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and 2 of 15 who were indeterminate. None of the 10 RIBA-2-nonreactive donors had evidence of viremia. The 15 RIBA-2- indeterminate samples were tested with third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3); the results showed reactivity in 5 (including the 2 HCV RNA positive), an indeterminate pattern in 7, and nonreactivity in 3 (all RNA negative). Among HCV RNA-positive subjects, mean age (p < 0.05), mean ALT (p < 0.001), signal-to-cutoff (S:CO) ratio on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (p < 0.001), and gamma globulin levels (p < 0.05) were higher than those among HCV RNA-negative subjects. During 6 additional months of ALT monitoring, completed by 36 of 39 donors, increased values were detected in 6 (5 HCV RNA positive). In 4 of those 6, however, ALT levels were less than 1.5-fold the upper normal limit. HCV RNA results were unchanged at the end of 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Forty-one percent of anti-HCV-positive donors with persistently normal ALT had active HCV infection. Long-term ALT monitoring allowed the detection of significantly increased enzyme values in only 2 of 16 viremic donors. Reactivity on RIBA-2 or -3, greater age, mean ALT levels in the upper range of normal, higher S:CO ratio on second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and higher gamma globulin levels were predictive of viremia.     

Performance of three generations of anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays in donors and patients

BACKGROUND: Prevention of posttransfusion non-A,non-B hepatitis in recipients of blood components improved considerably with the introduction of the second-generation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody tests. In 1993, third-generation HCV antibody assays were introduced in Europe. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The performance of three generations of anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (ELISA-1, -2, -3) was compared in routine blood donor screening (99,394 donations were tested with ELISA-1, 167,999 donations with ELISA-2, and 262,090 donations with ELISA-3) and in serial samples from nine patients with documented acute posttransfusion HCV infection. RESULTS: Eight (0.01%) repeat donors, previously negative in ELISA-1, were found positive in ELISA-2 and were confirmed as positive in second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and/or cDNA polymerase chain reaction. In the donor population, no difference in the sensitivity of ELISA-2 and - 3 was observed. The specificity of the three generations of ELISAs was comparable (99.8, 99.7, and 99.7%). In seroconversion samples, ELISA-2 and -3 detected HCV antibodies at the same time in seven patients, but in two patients, ELISA-3 found HCV antibodies, respectively, 63 and 77 days earlier than ELISA-2 did. In the seroconversion samples, ELISA-2 and -3 were significantly more sensitive than second- and third- generation recombinant immunoblot assays. CONCLUSION: ELISA-3 did not detect more HCV-infected individuals in a donor population that previously tested negative in ELISA-2, but it did detect HCV antibodies earlier in some patients with acute HCV infection. ELISA-2 and -3 were significantly more sensitive than second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assays.     

Anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) seroconversion in patients undergoing hemodialysis: comparison of second- and third-generation anti-HCV assays

BACKGROUND: The results obtained in sequential specimens from recently infected subjects generally provide the best means of comparing the sensitivity of assays. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of second- and third-generation assays for antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) was compared on sequential specimens, generally collected at monthly intervals from 45 patients undergoing hemodialysis who seroconverted for HCV between 1980 and 1990. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (33%) were positive earlier in the third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with a mean difference of 17 days (range, 7–30) between the last negative and the first positive specimens. At the first rise in alanine aminotransferase, and at its peak, 63 and 91 percent of the patients, respectively, were anti-HCV positive in the third-generation ELISA. Third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) reacted at the same time as third-generation ELISA. Of the first specimens that were positive in second-generation ELISA, 44 percent reacted and 56 percent were indeterminate in third-generation RIBA, while 10 percent reacted, 72 percent were indeterminate, and 18 percent did not react in second-generation RIBA. From the beginning to the end of the follow-up, antibody to c33c was the most prevalent, followed in descending order by antibody to c22-3, antibody to c100-3, and antibody to NS5: 56, 54, 26, and 18 percent, respectively, at time 0, and 100, 86, 83, and 31 percent, respectively, 12 months later. CONCLUSION: Third-generation assays (both ELISA and RIBA) were more sensitive than second-generation assays in the diagnosis of HCV infection, in that positive results were obtained earlier and a higher proportion of specimens were confirmed positive in RIBA testing.     

Limited utility of alanine aminotransferase screening of hepatitis C antibody-screened blood donors

BACKGROUND: The introduction of hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening has significantly reduced the frequency of posttransfusion hepatitis C. To examine the current added value of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) screening, all donor screening at two large blood centers was reviewed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From July 1991 through March 1994, 1,258,000 allogeneic blood donors were screened by enzyme immunoassay for anti- HCV: 343,000 donations by the first-generation test (HCV 1.0) and 915,000 donations by the second-generation test (HCV 2.0). Donations with positive EIA results were confirmed with a recombinant immunoblot assay. RESULTS: Of these donors, 1,637 (0.13%) were confirmed as HCV- positive and 21,666 (1.72%) had elevated ALT. To estimate the additional margin of safety due to ALT screening, all donors who seroconverted were reviewed, and those donors who had elevated ALT but were HCV negative on a previous donation were identified. One hundred eleven HCV seroconversions were observed: 19 seroconversions from HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 1.0-confirmed-positive, 82 apparent seroconversions from HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 2.0-confirmed-positive, and 10 seroconversions from HCV 2.0-negative to HCV 2.0-confirmed-positive. The number of apparent HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 2.0-positive seroconversions was much greater than expected, which reflected the increased sensitivity of HCV 2.0. Only 15 donors were identified who had an elevated ALT on a previous HCV-negative blood donation, and all of these were among those who apparently seroconverted from HCV 1.0- negative to HCV 2.0-confirmed-positive. Out of the 10 HCV 2.0- seroconverting donors, no donor was found who was initially HCV 2.0 negative with elevated ALT and later was HCV 2.0 positive; nor were such donors found among 4 additional HCV 2.0-seroconverting donors. CONCLUSION: With the introduction of HCV 2.0 screening. ALT appears to have little value as a surrogate test for hepatitis C, and ALT testing was unable to detect any donors who later seroconverted, as detected by HCV 2.0.     

CMV DNA is rarely detected in healthy blood donors using validated PCR assays

BACKGROUND: Although serologic screening or WBC reduction of blood components can reduce the incidence of transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) infection, 'breakthrough' cases of TT-CMV still occur and may produce serious sequelae. NAT of blood components for CMV DNA has been proposed to further reduce the risks of TT-CMV. However, large-scale studies to determine the utility of validated CMV NAT assays for donor screening have not been reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Coded whole-blood samples (n=1000) were tested for the presence of CMV DNA using two CMV PCR assays previously validated in a multicenter trial (a nested PCR assay directed at the CMV UL93 open-reading frame and the Roche Monitor assay). Corresponding plasma samples were tested in parallel for the presence of anti-CMV using other assays (Abbott CMV EIA and Fujirebio/Olympus CMV particle agglutination assays). RESULTS: In total 416 and 514 of the samples tested as CMV-seropositive and -seronegative, respectively, by both antibody assays. The remaining 70 samples had discrepant serology results. Only 2 of the 1000 samples (both seropositive) had reproducibly detectable CMV DNA (positive in at least three of four replicates). CMV DNA was not reproducibly detected in seronegative samples or in samples with discrepant serology results. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous investigations showed frequent detection of CMV DNA in healthy CMV-seropositive (and some seronegative) blood donors, these studies were relatively small and the performance characteristics of their assays were difficult to evaluate. In contrast, the present large cross-sectional study of US donors utilized two previously validated PCR assays and demonstrated that CMV DNA is only rarely detectable in seropositive donors. Thus, the use of CMV PCR assays with optimal performance characteristics did not increase the detection of potentially infectious blood components beyond that provided by current serologic screening assays.     

Testing of individual blood donations for HCV RNA reduces the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HCV infection

BACKGROUND: To allow cost-effective RNA testing with NAT techniques, the national authorities of several countries have planned or already introduced tests of mixed specimens, that is, plasma pools. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: High-throughput extraction, amplification, and detection of HCV RNA from individual blood donations were optimized and validated. The feasibility of the method and the frequency of anti-HCV-negative, HCV RNA-positive donations were determined in a prospective study of 27,745 allogeneic and 792 autologous individual donations. RESULTS: The 50- and 95-percent detection limits of the method were determined at 44 IU per mL and 162 IU per mL, respectively (World Health Organization HCV reference material). When 201 HCV RNA-positive sera were taken as a reference, the sensitivity was 97.5 percent. The assay specificity was determined at 99.77 percent. During a 20-month period, two seronegative blood donors tested positive in HCV PCR. The viral load of these donations was 6 x 10(6) and 3 x 10(7) copies per mL, respectively. Thus, the yield of HCV RNA testing in this study was 7. 63 per 100,000 screened donations (95% CI, 1.25-22.07). In both PCR-positive donors, seroconversion was found in subsequent blood samples. CONCLUSION: This study compares the feasibility of single-donation HCV RNA screening, with the detection of a relatively high percentage of window-phase donations, to data reported from groups using HCV RNA testing of plasma pools. The relative yield of NAT of individual donations versus minipools should be directly investigated in the near future.     

Application of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of total hepatitis C virus core antigen in blood donors

Recent studies have shown that total hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen, both free and antibody bound, is an accurate indirect marker of viral replication that can be used in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of a new total HCV core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection and quantification of total core antigen in blood donors, testing positive for anti-HCV antibodies and for prospective low-risk population screening. A population comprising 257 samples, from blood donors detected reactive for anti-HCV antibodies [137 recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) positive and 120 RIBA indeterminate], were tested by using a new total HCV core antigen ELISA. HCV-RNA was quantified by using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in all RIBA-positive samples and RIBA-indeterminate samples that were positive for the total core antigen. Specificity of the assay was studied in 1070 healthy blood donors negative for anti-HCV antibodies. Compared with quantitative PCR assays, the total HCV core antigen assay showed 97.37% sensitivity. The three HCV-RNA-positive samples, which tested negative for the total core antigen, had a low viral load (< 1.4 x 10(4) IU mL(-1)). All samples with more than 1.4 x 10(4) IU mL(-1) of viral RNA were positive for total core antigen, independent of the HCV genotype. Concentration of total core antigen correlated significantly with those of HCV-RNA (r = 0.614, P < 0.0001). Overall specificity in freshly collected blood donor specimens was 99.63%. Our data indicate that the total HCV core antigen ELISA has a sensitivity close to PCR assays in diagnosing HCV infection in blood donors with anti-HCV antibodies and shows an excellent specificity in volunteer donors. This assay, in combination with anti-HCV antibodies screening tests, could be an alternative to molecular assays for HCV infection screening in blood donors.     

Confirmation of hepatitis C infection: a comparison of five immunoblot assays

BACKGROUND: Recently, new immunoblot assays for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) became available. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The performance of five confirmatory anti-HCV immunoblot assays was studied with samples with known HCV antibody and HCV RNA status. The assays were a third-generation strip recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-3, Chiron Corp., Emeryville, CA), a second-generation HCV blot (DB-2 blot, Diagnostic Biotechnology, Singapore), the Wellcozyme HCV Western blot (Murex blot, Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK), an immunodot HCV assay (Matrix, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL), and the third-generation HCV line immunoassay (Liatek-III, Organon Teknika, Boxtel, The Netherlands). RESULTS: Sensitivity on samples from 48 HCV RNA-positive, second-generation RIBA (RIBA-2)-positive persons and specificity on samples from 31 low-risk donors was 96 percent or better for all assays. The sensitivity on 31 HCV RNA-positive, RIBA-2- indeterminate samples was as follows: Liatek-III, 94 percent; RIBA-3, 90 percent; Murex blot, 61 percent; Matrix, 55 percent; and DB-2 blot, 39 percent. In testing 39 HCV RNA-negative, RIBA-2-indeterminate donor samples, the percentage found to be negative was Liatek-III, 77 percent; RIBA-3, 67 percent; Murex blot, 49 percent; DB-2 blot, 33 percent; and Matrix, 15 percent. The order of sensitivity on four HCV seroconversion series was (from high to low): RIBA-3, Liatek-III, DB-2 blot, Murex blot, and Matrix; the differences were small. CONCLUSION: Detection of HCV antibodies was not refined by the addition of new HCV antigens (NS5, E2/NS1), but by improved classical antigens (core, NS3, NS4). Replacement of the commonly used RIBA-2 will resolve the status of a high proportion of RIBA-2-indeterminate samples.     

Increased detection of hepatitis C virus infection in commercial plasma donors by a third-generation screening assay

BACKGROUND: Routine screening of blood donations with second-generation hepatitis hepatitis C virus (HCV) assays has substantially reduced the occurrence of posttransfusion hepatitis. However, following the development of third-generation assays, several studies indicated that these assays may identify HCV-infected individuals who are not identified by second-generation assays. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of a third-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA-3) was compared with a second-generation ELISA (ELISA-2) in a side-by-side study of 9936 commercial blood donors. ELISA-reactive specimens were subjected to supplemental analysis by third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: ELISA-3 demonstrated greater sensitivity than ELISA-2, detecting 1 additional recombinant immunoblot assay-positive specimen per 2000 tested. ELISA-3 also detected 1 additional HCV-infectious polymerase chain reaction-positive unit among approximately 10,000 units screened. CONCLUSION: The incremental sensitivity achieved with ELISA-3 can be expected to eliminate approximately 20 infectious donations per week among those made by commercial donors in the United States. In accordance with previous studies, most of the improved sensitivity of ELISA-3 derives from its increased detection of anti-c33c (NS3), rather than from the inclusion of HCV antigen NS5.     

Transmission of HCV infection by RIBA indeterminate and positive blood units

A retrospective study was carried out on the recipients of 73 units of blood from 53 donors found reactive for anti-HCV. The donors were screened with anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA C-100) and reactivity was confirmed with the first generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA I). Fifty-two patients were recipients of blood from donors reacting as RIBA I 'indeterminate' and 21 of blood from RIBA I 'positive' donors. Only three recipients (5.8%) from 'indeterminate' donors were anti-HCV positive indicating that such donors are very seldom infectious. Eleven (52.4%) recipients from 'positive' donors had antibodies to HCV, indicating that not all RIBA-positive donors are necessarily infectious. Pretransfusion samples of the seropositive recipients were unavailable. All samples were analyzed with the first generation ELISA and with either the second-generation ELISA or RIBA (RIBA II) in order to evaluate test sensitivity. RIBA II was more sensitive than RIB I. One RIBA I indeterminate donor was positive by RIBA II. His recipient had antibodies to HCV. Twelve RIBA I indeterminate and three RIBA I positive donors were negative by RIBA II. All their recipients were anti-HCV negative. The second-generation ELISA was also shown to be more sensitive than ELISA C-100. The second-generation ELISA detected six confirmed anti-HCV positive recipients who were negative by ELISA C-100.     

Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus in a blood donor population

Blood samples from 2000 accepted blood donors and 343 deferred donors with antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and/or an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were evaluated for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). Sixteen (0.8%) of the 2000 sera initially reacted on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); 12 (0.6%) were repeatably reactive. One repeatably reactive sample had an elevated ALT; two reacted on anti-HBc testing and had ALT elevations. When the repeatably reactive ELISA samples were tested by an immunoblot assay, four reacted, three were indeterminate, and five did not react. Among the 343 deferred donors, HCV antibodies were detected in 8 (3.8%) of 210 anti-HBc-reactive samples, 12 (11.8%) of 104 elevated-ALT samples, and 15 (52%) of 29 combined elevated-ALT and anti-HBc-reactive samples; 25 of 28 reacted on immunoblot. The anti-HBc-reactive sera were subdivided into groups according to strength of anti-HBc reactivity (weak or strong) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen status and then were compared for anti-HCV reactivity rates. The group of samples showing the greatest frequency of anti-HCV had strong anti-HBc reactivity. For blood donors, the anti-HCV test correlates with the surrogate tests for non-A, non-B hepatitis (anti-HBc and ALT); however, most anti-HCV-reactive units remain undetected by surrogate tests, so that implementation of anti-HCV screening should further reduce the transmission of HCV via transfusion.     

Safety and efficacy of hepatitis C virus antibody screening of blood donors with two sequential screening assays

BACKGROUND: Reactive samples in hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody screening of blood donors are currently referred for a confirmatory assay. This scheme is not optimally efficient and is expensive because of the lack of specificity and cost of confirmatory tests, as well as the need to discard false-positive donations. As in some human immunodeficiency virus antibody-confirmatory schemes, the safety and efficacy of confirming anti-HCV with two sequential screening assays were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three combinations of two anti-HCV screening assays were used to test 75,874 blood donors. Results were compared with the routine testing scheme and HCV RNA detection in any enzyme immunoassay-repeatably reactive samples. RESULTS: The use of an alternative screening assay for repeat testing decreased the proportion of enzyme immunoassay-positive donors from 0.28 to 0.05 percent. All samples that were "confirmed" as positive by the standard combination of immunoassays and all HCV RNA-positive samples were detected by the sequential screening assays. No samples that had discordant results on primary and secondary screening assays were confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay or were found to contain detectable HCV RNA. CONCLUSION: The combination of screening assays for anti-HCV confirmation was as safe as, cheaper than, and nearly as efficient as the standard testing scheme.