Chronic exposure to carbon monoxide and nicotine: endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonism attenuates carbon monoxide-induced myocardial hypertrophy in rat.

The aims of the present study were to determine the effects of endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonism on carbon monoxide (CO)-induced cardiac hypertrophy and endothelin-1 (ET-1) expression and to compare myocardial effects of chronic nicotine with CO exposure. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 84) were randomized to three groups exposed 20 h/day to CO (200 ppm), nicotine (500 microg/m3), or air for 14 consecutive days. In each exposure group, animals were randomized to ET(A) receptor antagonist LU 135252 in drinking water (0.5 mg/ml) or placebo. Myocardial ET-1 and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) expression was measured by competitive RT-PCR and plasma ET-1 by immunoassay. Carboxyhemoglobin was 22.1 +/- 0.3% in CO-exposed animals and 2.8 +/- 0.3% in controls. Plasma nicotine was 57 +/- 7 ng/ml and plasma cotinine was 590 +/- 23 ng/ml in nicotine-exposed animals and below detection levels in controls. CO exposure induced a 21% increase in right ventricular hypertrophy (p < 0.01), a 7% increase in left ventricular hypertrophy (p < 0.01), a 25% increase in right ventricular ET-1 expression (p < 0.05), and an eightfold increase in ANP expression (p = 0.08). ET(A) receptor antagonism reduced right ventricular hypertrophy by 60% (p < 0.05) with no significant effect on left ventricular hypertrophy or myocardial ET-1 expression. Chronic nicotine exposure did not significantly affect cardiac weights or ANP and ET-1 expression. We conclude that ET(A) receptor antagonism reduces right ventricular hypertrophy induced by chronic CO exposure, whereas CO-induced myocardial ET-1 expression remains unchanged.     

Differential effects of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonism on oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes

Endothelin (ET-1) is chronically elevated in diabetes. However, role of ET-1 in increased oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes is less clear. This study tested the hypotheses that: 1) oxidative stress markers are increased and total antioxidant capacity is decreased in diabetes, and 2) activation of ET(A) receptors mediates oxidative stress whereas ET(B) receptors display opposing effects. Plasma total antioxidant status (TAS) and 8-isoprostane (8-iso PGF(2alpha)) as well as total nitrotyrosine levels in mesenteric resistance vessels were measured in control Wistar and diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats (n=5-10) treated with vehicle, ET(A) antagonist (atrasentan, 5 mg/kg/day), or ET(B) receptor antagonist (A-192621, 15 or 30 mg/kg/day, low and high dose, respectively) for 4 weeks. 8-iso PGF(2alpha) (pg/ml) levels were significantly higher in low dose A-192621 treatment groups of control and diabetic rats than in atrasentan or high-dose A-192621 treated groups. Protein nitration was increased in diabetes and ET(A) receptor antagonism prevented this increase. TAS levels were similar in all experimental groups. Thus, ET-1 contributes to oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes and ET receptor antagonism with atrasentan or A-192612 displays differential effects depending on dose and receptor subtype.     

Endothelin-1-induced venous contraction is maintained in DOCA-salt hypertension; studies with receptor agonists

1. Deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) salt hypertension is associated with an endothelin-1 (ET-1)-dependent increase in arterial resistance and mean circulatory filling pressure. Contraction of endothelium-intact arteries and veins from sham and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats to agonists of the ET(A) (ET-1((1-31))) and ET(B) receptor (sarafotoxin 6c; S6c) was investigated in tissue baths as was expression of mRNA for ET-1 and mRNA and protein for the ET(A) and ET(B) receptor. 2. ET-1((1-31)) contracted aorta and vena cava from sham rats with a 30 fold lower potency than ET-1. Contraction was not altered by the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ788 (100 nM) but was abolished by the ET(A) receptor antagonist ABT-627 (30 nM). 3. In DOCA-salt thoracic aorta, maximum contraction to ET-1 and ET-1((1-31)) was reduced (36.6 +/- 6.3 and 13.3 +/- 4.4% of sham response, respectively); aorta did not contract to S6c. 4. In vena cava from DOCA-salt rats, contraction to ET-1 and ET-1((1-31)) was not reduced compared to sham contraction; vena cava from sham and DOCA-salt rats contracted to S6c with a similar potency. 5. Real time RT-PCR revealed that prepro ET-1 mRNA was increased 6.6 +/- 3.3 fold and 8.7 +/- 3.9 fold greater in DOCA-salt aorta and vena cava, respectively, compared to sham. Vena cava expressed a higher content of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor mRNA than aorta (P < 0.05), but no differences were observed between sham and DOCA-salt tissues. ET(A) and ET(B) receptor protein was identified in all tissues. Immunoreactive ET(A) receptor, observed as a 65, 30 and 28 kDa bands, was expressed 400% greater in DOCA-salt aorta compared to sham, but was not altered in vena cava. Immunoreactive ET(B) receptor, observed as 120, 45 and 30 kDa bands, tended to be higher in vena cava compared to aorta, but was not different in sham and DOCA-salt vena cava. 6. These results suggest that ET(A) receptor function is impaired in aorta but not vena cava of DOCA-salt rats. The ET(B) receptor was present in the aorta but, unlike in veins, does not mediate contraction directly. A sustained response to ET-1 in the venous circulation may contribute to the elevated blood pressure in the DOCA-salt model.     

Role of the endothelin axis and its antagonists in the treatment of cancer

The endothelins (ET) are a group of proteins that act through G-protein coupled receptors. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) was initially identified as a potent vasoconstrictor and dysregulation of the ET axis contributes to pathological processes responsible for cardiovascular disease states. More recently, the ET axis, in particular ET-1 acting through the endothelin A receptor (ET(A) ), has been implicated in the development of several cancers through activation of pathways involved in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, osteogenesis and angiogenesis. The endothelin B receptor (ET(B) ) may counter tumour progression by promoting apoptosis and clearing ET-1; however, it has recently been implicated in the development of some tumour types including melanomas and oligodendrogliomas. Here, we review emerging preclinical and clinical data outlining the role of the ET axis in cancer, and its antagonism as an attractive and challenging approach to improve clinical cancer management. Clinical data of ET(A) antagonists in patients with prostate cancer are encouraging and provide promise for new ET(A) antagonist-based treatment strategies. Given the unexpected opportunities to affect pleiotrophic tumorigenic signals by targeting ET(A)-mediated pathways in a number of cancers, the evaluation of ET-targeted therapy in cancer warrants further investigation.     

Pharmacological endothelin receptor interaction does not occur in veins from ET(B) receptor deficient rats

Heterodimerization of G-protein coupled receptors can alter receptor pharmacology. ET A and ET B receptors heterodimerize when co-expressed in heterologous expression lines. We hypothesized that ET A and ET B receptors heterodimerize and pharmacologically interact in vena cava from wild-type (WT) but not ET B receptor deficient (sl/sl) rats. Pharmacological endothelin receptor interaction was assessed by comparing ET-1-induced contraction in rings of rat thoracic aorta and thoracic vena cava from male Sprague Dawley rats under control conditions, ET A receptor blockade (atrasentan, 10 nM), ET B receptor blockade (BQ-788, 100 nM) or ET B receptor desensitization (Sarafotoxin 6c, 100 nM) and ET A plus ET B receptor blockade or ET A receptor blockade plus ET B receptor desensitization. In addition, similar pharmacological ET receptor antagonism experiments were performed in rat thoracic aorta and vena cava from WT and sl/sl rats. ET A but not ET B receptor blockade or ET B receptor desensitization inhibited aortic and venous ET-1-induced contraction. In vena cava but not aorta, when ET B receptors were blocked (BQ-788, 100 nM) or desensitized (S6c, 100 nM), atrasentan caused a greater inhibition of ET-1-induced contraction. Vena cava from WT but not sl/sl rats exhibited similar pharmacological ET receptor interaction. Immunocytochemistry was performed on freshly dissociated aortic and venous vascular smooth muscle cells to determine localization of ET A and ET B receptors. ET A and ET B receptors qualitatively co-localized more strongly to the plasma membrane of aortic compared to venous vascular smooth muscle cells. Our data suggest that pharmacological ET A and ET B receptor interaction may be dependent on the presence of functional ET B receptors and independent of receptor location.     

Vascular endothelin receptor type B: structure, function and dysregulation in vascular disease

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a major regulator of vascular function, acting via both endothelin receptor type A (ET(A)R) and type B (ET(B)R). Although the role of ET(A)R in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) contraction has been studied, little is known about ET(B)R. ET(B)R is a G-protein coupled receptor with a molecular mass of ~50 kDa and 442 amino acids arranged in seven transmembrane domains. Alternative splice variants of ET(B)R and heterodimerization and cross-talk with ET(A)R may affect the receptor function. ET(B)R has been identified in numerous blood vessels with substantial effects in the systemic, renal, pulmonary, coronary and cerebral circulation. ET(B)R in the endothelium mediates the release of relaxing factors such as nitric oxide, prostacyclin and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, and could also play a role in ET-1 clearance. ET(B)R in VSM mediates increases in [Ca(2+)](i), protein kinase C, mitogen-activated protein kinase and other pathways of VSM contraction and cell growth. ET-1/ET(A)R signaling has been associated with salt-sensitive hypertension (HTN) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and ET(A)R antagonists have shown some benefits in these conditions. In search for other pathogenetic factors and more effective approaches, the role of alterations in endothelial ET(B)R and VSM ET(B)R in vascular dysfunction, and the potential benefits of modulators of ET(B)R in treatment of HTN and PAH are being examined. Combined ET(A)R/ET(B)R antagonists could be more efficacious in the management of conditions involving upregulation of ET(A)R and ET(B)R in VSM. Combined ET(A)R antagonist with ET(B)R agonist may need to be evaluated in conditions associated with decreased endothelial ET(B)R expression/activity.     

Targeting endothelin ETA and ETB receptors inhibits antigen-induced neutrophil migration and mechanical hypernociception in mice

Endothelin may contribute to the development of inflammatory events such as leukocyte recruitment and nociception. Herein, we investigated whether endothelin-mediated mechanical hypernociception (decreased nociceptive threshold, evaluated by electronic pressure-meter) and neutrophil migration (myeloperoxidase activity) are inter-dependent in antigen challenge-induced Th1-driven hind-paw inflammation. In antigen challenge-induced inflammation, endothelin (ET) ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonism inhibited both hypernociception and neutrophil migration. Interestingly, ET-1 peptide-induced hypernociception was not altered by inhibiting neutrophil migration or endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonism, but rather by endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonism. Furthermore, endothelin ET(A), but not ET(B), receptor antagonism inhibited antigen-induced PGE(2) production, whereas either selective or combined blockade of endothelin ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptors reduced hypernociception and neutrophil recruitment caused by antigen challenge. Concluding, this study advances knowledge into the role for endothelin in inflammatory mechanisms and further supports the potential of endothelin receptor antagonists in controlling inflammation.     

Modulation of ET-1-induced contraction of human bronchi by airway epithelium-dependent nitric oxide release via ET(A) receptor activation

1. The purpose of this work was to investigate whether endothelin-1 (ET-1) was able to induce the release of an inhibitory factor from the airway epithelium in isolated human bronchi and to identify this mediator as well as the endothelin receptor involved in this phenomenon. 2. In intact bronchi, ET-1 induced a concentration-dependent contraction (-logEC50 = 7.92+/-0.09, n = 18) which was potentiated by epithelium removal (-logEC50 = 8.65+/-0.11, n = 17). BQ-123 , an ET(A) receptor antagonist, induced a significant leftward shift of the ET-1 concentration-response curve (CRC). This leftward shift was abolished after epithelium removal. 3. L-NAME (3 x 10(-3) M), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, induced a significant leftward shift of the ET-1 CRC, and abolished the potentiation by BQ-123 (10(-8) M) of ET-1-induced contraction. 4. In intact preparations, the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 induced only at 10(-5) M a slight rightward shift of the ET-1 CRC. In contrast, in epithelium-denuded bronchi or in intact preparations in the presence of L-NAME, BQ-788 displayed a non-competitive antagonism toward ET-1-induced contraction. 5. IRL 1620, a selective ET(B) receptor agonist, induced a contraction of the isolated bronchus (-logEC50=7.94+/-0.11, n= 19). This effect was not modified by epithelium removal or by BQ-123. BQ-788 exerted a competitive antagonism against IRL 1620 which was similar in the presence or absence of epithelium. 6. These results show that ET-1 exerts two opposite effects on the human airway smooth muscle. One is contractile via ETB-receptor activation, the other is inhibitory and responsible of NO release which counteracts via ETA-receptor activation the contraction.     

Endothelin-1 enhances neutrophil adhesion to human coronary artery endothelial cells: role of ET(A) receptors and platelet-activating factor.

1. The potent coronary vasoconstrictor, endothelin-1 (ET-1) may also regulate neutrophil traffic into tissues. The aim of the present study was to characterize the endothelin receptors responsible and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. 2. ET-1 (1 nM - 1 microM) markedly enhanced attachment of human neutrophils to lipopolysaccharide-, and to a lesser extent, to ET-1-activated human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAEC). This can partially be blocked by monoclonal antibodies against E-selectin, L-selectin or CD18, whereas combination of the three antibodies inhibited adhesion by approximately 83%. Increases in neutrophil adhesion evoked by ET-1 were also blocked by the platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonists, BN 52021 (50 microM) and WEB 2086 (10 microM). 3. ET-1 downregulated the expression of L-selectin and upregulated expression of CD11b/CD18 and CD45 on the neutrophil surface and induced gelatinase release with EC50 values of approximately 2 nM. These actions of ET-1 were almost completely prevented by the ET(A) receptor antagonist FR 139317 (1 microM) and the ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist bosentan (10 microM), whereas the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ 788 (1 microM) had no effect. ET-1 slightly increased the expression of E-selectin and ICAM-1 on HCAEC, that was prevented by BQ 788, but not by FR 139317. 4. Receptor binding studies indicated the presence of ET(B) receptors (KD: 40 pM) on phosphoramidon-treated HCAEC and the predominant expression of ET(A) receptors (KD: 38 pM) on neutrophils. 5. These results indicate that promotion by ET-1 of neutrophil adhesion to HCAEC is predominantly mediated through activation of ET(A) receptors on neutrophils and subsequent generation of PAF.     

Interaction and inhibitory cross-talk between endothelin and ErbB receptors in the adult heart

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) regulates contractility and growth of the mammalian heart by binding endothelin receptor type A (ET(A)) and endothelin receptor type B (ET(B)) G-protein-coupled receptors. To identify growth signaling pathways associated with ET-1 receptors in adult myocardium, a combined immunoprecipitation/proteomic analysis was performed. Signaling proteins believed to function downstream of ET(A) such as Galpha(q), phospholipase C-beta1, protein kinase C (PKC) epsilon, and PKCdelta were identified in immunoprecipitates of ET(A) by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time of flight mass spectrometry. Also prominent were the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases erbB2 and erbB4 and their downstream growth signaling effectors phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3 kinase), Akt, Raf-1, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk). Western blot analysis confirmed coimmunoprecipitation of erbB2/4, PI3 kinase, and Akt with ET(A), and confocal microscopy revealed their colocalization in cardiac transverse tubules (T-tubules). The erbB4 receptor ligand neuregulin-1beta (NRG1beta) promoted erbB2/4 tryosine phosphorylation and Akt serine phosphorylation in ventricular myocytes, whereas treatment with ET-1 did not. This observation argues against ET-1 growth signaling occurring via erbB2/4 transactivation in adult myocardium. ET-1 did, however, stimulate Erk1/2 phosphorylation and substantially blunted several NRG1beta-mediated actions, including erbB2/4 phosphorylation, serine phosphorylation of Akt, and negative inotropy. This inhibitory cross-talk between ET(A) and erbB2/4-Akt pathways was mimicked by a phorbol ester and blocked by pharmacological inhibition of PKC or MEK/Erk. The proteomic analysis and subsequent investigation of receptor cross-talk indicate that growth signaling between ET(A) and erbB pathways is fundamentally different in adult versus neonatal cardiac myocytes. The results may be relevant to cardiomyopathies associated with 1) prolonged exposure to ET-1; 2) degeneration of T-tubules; and 3) therapies targeted at erbB2 inhibition.     

Rapid regulation of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier by endothelin-1

The ATP-driven xenobiotic transporter P-glycoprotein is a critical element of the blood-brain barrier. To study regulation of P-glycoprotein function, we measured specific transport [(3'-oxo-4-butenyl-4-methyl-threonine(1), (valine(2)) cyclosporin (PSC833)-sensitive] of the fluorescent cyclosporin A derivative [N-epsilon(4-nitrobenzofurazan-7-yl)-D-Lys(8)]-cyclosporin A (NBDL-CSA) into the lumens of isolated rat brain capillaries using confocal microscopy and quantitative image analysis. Luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation was rapidly and reversibly reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by 0.1 to 100 nM endothelin-1 (ET-1). In this concentration range, ET-1 did not affect junctional permeability. The ET(B) receptor agonist sarafotoxin 6c also reduced transport. An ET(B) receptor antagonist blocked effects of ET-1 and sarafotoxin 6c; an ET(A) receptor antagonist was without effect. Consistent with this, immunostaining and Western blotting showed expression of the ET(B) receptor in brain capillary membranes. NBDL-CSA transport was also reduced by sodium nitroprusside, a NO donor, and by phorbol ester, a protein kinase C (PKC) activator. Inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) or PKC abolished the ET-1 effects. Thus, ET-1, acting through an ET(B) receptor, NOS, and PKC rapidly and reversibly reduced transport mediated by P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier.     

Differentiated effects on splanchnic homeostasis by selective and non-selective endothelin receptor antagonism in porcine endotoxaemia

1. The non-selective endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist bosentan has been shown to restore systemic and gut oxygen delivery and reverse intestinal mucosal acidosis in porcine endotoxin shock. 2. To further elucidate the specific role of the ETA as opposed to the ETB receptor and their effects in the splanchnic region a non-selective (ET(MIX)ra) A-182086 and selective ETA (ET(A)ra) PD155080 and ETB (ET(B)ra) A-192621 receptor antagonists were administered, separately or simultaneously (ET(A+B)ra) 2 h after onset of endotoxin shock. These four groups were compared to a control group receiving only endotoxin and vehicle. 3. Thirty-nine pigs were anaesthetized and catheterized for measurement of central and regional haemodynamics. A tonometer in the distal ileum was used for measurement of mucosal PCO2. Blood gases and plasma ET-1-LI levels as well as histological samples from the gut were assessed. Intervention was started 2 h after onset of endotoxemia and the experiments were terminated after 5 h. 4. Endotoxin-induced changes in systemic, gut oxygen delivery and portal hepatic vascular resistance and systemic acidosis were effectively counteracted by both ET(A+B)ra an ET(MIX)ra. ET(A)ra administration was not effective while ET(B)ra proved to be fatal as all animals in this group died prior to full time of the experiment. While both ET(A+B)ra and ET(MIX)ra improved gut oxygen delivery only the latter attenuated the profound endotoxin-induced ileal mucosal acidosis. 5. The lethal effect seen from selective ETB receptor antagonism in the current study may be due to increased ETA receptor activity as plasma levels of ET-1 is increased several fold by blocking the ETB receptor and thereby the plasma-ET-1-clearing function. Furthermore, a loss of endothelial ETB receptor vasodilating properties may also have contributed to the lethal course in the ET(B)ra group. 6. The findings in this study suggest that ET is involved in the profound endotoxin-induced disturbances in splanchnic homeostasis in porcine endotoxaemia. Furthermore, antagonism of both ETA and ETB receptors is necessary to effectively counteract these changes.     

Agonist-dependent modulation of arterial endothelinA receptor function

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Endothelin-1 (ET-1) causes long-lasting vasoconstrictions. These can be prevented by ET(A) receptor antagonists but are only poorly reversed by these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that endothelin ET(A) receptors are susceptible to allosteric modulation by endogenous agonists and exogenous ligands. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Rat isolated mesenteric resistance arteries were pretreated with capsaicin and studied in wire myographs, in the presence of L-NAME and indomethacin to concentrate on arterial smooth muscle responses. KEY RESULTS Endothelins caused contractions with equal maximum but differing potency (ET-1 = ET-2 > ET-3). ET-1(1-15) neither mimicked nor antagonized these effects in the absence and presence of ET(16-21). 4(Ala) ET-1 (ET(B) agonist) and BQ788 (ET(B) antagonist) were without effects. BQ123 (peptide ET(A) antagonist) reduced the sensitivity and relaxed the contractile responses to endothelins. Both effects depended on the agonist (pK(B): ET-3 = ET-1 > ET-2; % relaxation: ET-3 = ET-2 > ET-1). Also, with PD156707 (non-peptide ET(A) antagonist) agonist-dependence and a discrepancy between preventive and inhibitory effects were observed. The latter was even more marked with bulky analogues of BQ123 and PD156707. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS These findings indicate allosteric modulation of arterial smooth muscle ET(A) receptor function by endogenous agonists and by exogenous endothelin receptor antagonists. This may have consequences for the diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of diseases involving endothelins.     

Endothelin receptor expression and pharmacology in human saphenous vein graft

1. We have investigated the expression and pharmacology of endothelin (ET) receptors in human aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts. 2. Subtype-selective ligands were used to autoradiographically identify ET(A) ([125I]-PD151242) and ET(B)([125I]-BQ3020) receptors. In graft saphenous vein ETA receptors predominated in the media, with few ET(B) receptors identified. Neither subtype was detected in the thickened neointima. 3. The ratio of medial ET(A):ET(B) receptors was 75%: 25% in both graft and control saphenous vein. 4. ET-1 contracted control (EC50 2.9 nM) and graft (EC50 4.5 nM) saphenous vein more potently than diseased coronary artery (EC50 25.5 nM). 5. In all three blood vessels ET-1 was 100 times more potent than ET-3 and three times more potent than sarafotoxin 6b (S6b). Little or no response was obtained in any vessel with the ET(B) agonist sarafotoxin 6c (S6c). 6. The ET(A) antagonist PD156707 (100 nM) blocked ET-1 responses in all three vessels with pKb values of approximately 8.0. 7. For individual graft veins the EC50 value for ET-1 and 'age' of graft in years showed a significant negative correlation. 8. In conclusion there is no alteration in ET receptor expression in the media of saphenous veins grafted into the coronary circulation compared to control veins. ETA receptors predominantly mediate the vasoconstrictor response to ET-1 in graft vein, with no apparent up-regulation of ET(B) receptors. The sensitivity of the graft vein to ET-1 increased with graft 'age', suggesting that these vessels may be particularly vulnerable to the increased plasma ET levels that are detected in patients with cardiovascular disease.     

Characterization of endothelin receptors in the human umbilical artery and vein.

The aim of the present study was to characterize pharmacologically endothelin receptors that are present in human umbilical vessels. 2. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin-2 (ET-2) are potent stimulants of both the human umbilical artery (pEC50 7.9 and 7.5) and vein (pEC50 8.1 and 8.0). Endothelin-3 (ET-3) is inactive on the artery but contracts the vein (pEC50 7.6). IRL1620 is inactive in both vessels. The order of potency of agonists is suggestive of a typical ET(A) receptor in the artery (ET-1 = ET-2 > > ET-3) and a mixture of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in the vein (ET-1 = ET-2 > or = ET-3). 3. The selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ123, competitively inhibits the effect of ET-1 in the human umbilical artery (pA2 6.9), while in the vein, only a mixture of BQ123 and BQ788 (a selective ET(B) antagonist) weakly displaces to the right of the cumulative concentration-response curve to ET-1. Contractions induced by ET-3 in the vein are inhibited by BQ788 (pA2 7.6), but not by BQ123. 4. Inhibition of Ca2+ channels by nifedipine (0.1 microM) is accompanied by a significant decrease of the maximal response to ET-1 by 40% in the artery and by 30% in the vein. The response of the vein to ET-3 is almost abolished by nifedipine. 5. The results indicate that: (i) endothelins contract the human isolated umbilical artery via stimulation of an ET(A) receptor type; (ii) the contraction induced by ET-1 in the vein is mediated by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, while ET-3 stimulates the ET(B) receptor; (iii) the contribution of Ca2+ channels to the contraction mediated by the ET(B) receptor appears to be more important than to that mediated by the ET(A) receptor.