A dose escalating study of oxaliplatin and high dose weekly leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of L-OHP plus 5-FU and LV in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received escalated doses of L-OHP (starting dose 50 mg/m2) as a 2-hour IV infusion on Days 1 and 15, and LV (500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour IV infusion) followed by escalated doses of 5FU (starting dose 1,800 mg/m2) as a 22-hour continuous IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, 21 every 6 weeks. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients [median age: 66 years; PS (ECOG) 0-1 in 90 percent] were treated on 12 dose-levels. Five (10 percent) patients had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 24 (46 percent) one, and 23 (44 percent) were chemo-na?ve. The DLT was reached at the dose of LOHP 100 mg/m2 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2. Dose-limiting events were G3 diarrhea, G3 asthenia, G4 neutropenia, and G4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 (12 percent) patients and Grade 3 fatigue in 6 (12 percent). One (2 percent) patient developed Grade 4 neutropenia and another (2 percent) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The MTD were L-OHP 95 mg/m2 on d1 and d15 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks.     

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and fluorouracil as a continuous infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were candidates for the study. 5-FU was given via protracted venous infusion (PVI) at a fixed dosage of 200 mg/m2/d, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 700 mg/m2 and was escalated in increments of 100 mg/m2/wk until the appearance of severe toxicity. Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate; clinical benefit response, which is a composite measurement of pain, performance status, and weight loss; time to disease progression; and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 109 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of grade 4 neutropenia with fever (one patient) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (one patient), was observed in two of three patients treated with 1,100 mg/m2/wk of gemcitabine. On the basis of these results, the MTD of gemcitabine with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2. Sixteen patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and three patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of diarrhea (two patients) and cutaneous toxicity, asthenia, edema, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting (one patient each). The delivered dose-intensity of gemcitabine was similar at the 1,000 mg/m2 dose level (599 mg/m2/wk) as at the 900 mg/m2 (601 mg/m2/wk) dose level. For this reason, the recommended dose of gemcitabine for phase II evaluation on this schedule was 900 mg/m2. Five patients had objective responses (one complete response and four partial responses; response rate, 19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 39.3), and 10 patients had improvement of disease-related symptoms (45%; 95% CI, 24 to 67). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 7.8 to 24.8 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 11.4) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when combined with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2/ wk; however, on the basis of administered dose-intensity, the recommended dose for additional investigation is 900 mg/m2. This combination chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine combined with monthly, fixed-dose docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with metastatic solid tumors were treated with docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 every 28 days. Gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 and underwent dose adjustment in cohorts of 3-6 patients. At the maximum tolerated dose, 11 additional patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 85 cycles of therapy. At the first dose level, the planned gemcitabine dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 was 800 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at this dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) requiring the reduction of gemcitabine to 600 mg/m(2) per dose and the administration of ciprofloxacin, 500 mg orally twice daily, on Days 8-18. At the second dose level the first 3 patients experienced no DLTs and the dose of gemcitabine was increased to 700 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at the 700 mg/m(2) dose level experienced DLTs. Eleven additional patients were enrolled at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2)). At this dose level, Grade 3/4 (according the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria) neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5% and 2.1% of cycles, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon. Three of seven evaluable patients with pancreatic carcinoma had evidence of significant antineoplastic activity (three partial responses). In addition, two complete responses (one patient with gastric carcinoma and one patient with ovarian carcinoma) and one partial response (patient with hepatocellular carcinoma) were noted in patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen comprised of docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 600 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 8, and 15 with ciprofloxacin on Days 8-18 every 28 days is safe, well tolerated, and active.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of tezacitabine in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND: Tezacitabine [(E)-2'-deoxy-2'-(fluoromethylene) cytidine; FMdC] is a novel nucleoside analog with potent antiproliferative and antitumor activity in preclinical studies. A tolerable safety profile and clinical activity have been shown in Phase I and Phase II clinical studies. The purpose of the current open-label, Phase I dose-escalation trial was to evaluate the combination of tezacitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with a variety of advanced solid tumors for which there was no curative therapy were enrolled. Bolus infusion tezacitabine was administered on Day 1 of a 14-day cycle at escalating doses of 150-350 mg/m(2), with continuous infusion 5-FU (CI 5-FU) given on Days 1-7 at a fixed dose of 200 mg/m(2) per day. Patients underwent objective tumor evaluation by radiologic methods or clinical examination at baseline and after every fourth treatment cycle. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of the combination therapy was determined to be tezacitabine, 200 mg/m(2), with CI 5-FU, 200 mg/m(2) per day. The toxicities were manageable, the most notable being transient severe (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4) neutropenia in 23 patients (96%). Eleven (55%) of the 20 assessable patients had partial responses or stabilization of disease. The highest response rate was in patients with primary tumors of esophageal origin. CONCLUSIONS: Tezacitabine at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) in combination with CI 5-FU at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) per day was relatively well tolerated and had clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, particularly in patients with esophageal and other gastrointestinal carcinomas.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of PN401 and fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering PN401, an oral uridine prodrug, as a rescue agent for the toxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU), and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of 5-FU when given with PN401, with an 8-hour treatment interval between these agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of 5-FU, given as a rapid intravenous infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. PN401 was administered orally 8 hours after 5-FU administration, to achieve sustained plasma uridine concentrations of at least 50 micromol/L. Initially, patients received 6 g of PN401 orally every 8 hours for eight doses (schedule 1). When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was consistently noted, patients then received 6 g of PN401 every 2 hours for three doses and every 6 hours thereafter for 15 doses (schedule 2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 50 courses of 5-FU and PN401. Among patients on schedule 1, DLT (grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever and diarrhea) occurred in those receiving 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk. Among patients on schedule 2, 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk was well tolerated, but grade 4, protracted (> 5 days) neutropenia was consistently noted in those treated with higher doses of the drugs. Nonhematologic effects were uncommon and rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, assessed in 12 patients on schedule 2, were nonlinear, with the mean area under the time-versus-concentration curve (AUC) increasing from 298 +/- 44 to 962 +/- 23 micromol/L and mean clearance decreasing from 34 +/- 4 to 15.6 +/- 0.38 L/h/m(2) as the dose of 5-FU was increased from 1,250 to 1,950 mg/m(2)/wk. 5-FU AUCs achieved with 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks along with the intensified PN401 dose schedule were approximately five-fold higher than those achieved with 5-FU alone. Plasma uridine concentrations increased with each of the three PN401 doses given every 2 hours, and uridine steady-state concentrations were greater than 50 micromol/L. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral PN401 beginning 8 hours after 5-FU administration is well tolerated and results in sustained plasma uridine concentrations above therapeutic-relevant levels. The recommended 5-FU dosage for phase II evaluations is 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with the intensified PN401 dose schedule (schedule 2). At this dose, systemic exposure to 5-FU as measured by AUC was five-fold higher than that observed after administration of a conventional 5-FU bolus.     

A high rate of venous thromboembolism in a multi-institutional phase II trial of weekly intravenous gemcitabine with continuous infusion fluorouracil and daily thalidomide in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the clinical response rate of the combination of weekly intravenous (IV) gemcitabine with continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) and daily oral thalidomide in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Between June, 2000 and January, 2001, 21 patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled onto this multi-institutional Phase II study of gemcitabine at 600 mg/m(2) per day on Days 1, 8, and 15; 5-FU at 150 mg/m(2) per day by continuous IV infusion through a permanent catheter on Days 1-21; and oral thalidomide on Days 1-28 starting at a dose of 200 mg daily. After the first 2 weeks of therapy, the thalidomide dose was escalated by 100 mg per day every week to a maximum dose of 400 mg per day unless it was precluded by toxicity. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: A high rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed. Five patients developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), three patients developed pulmonary embolization (PE), and one patient suffered a fatal cardiac arrest preceded by hemoptysis, for an overall VTE rate of 43%. Of the 18 assessable patients, there were no complete responses and 2 partial responses (objective response rate, 10%; 95% confidence interval, 1-30%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of thalidomide to gemcitabine and 5-FU did not improve the objective response rate previously observed with gemcitabine and 5-FU alone and added significant vascular toxicity. The authors recommend against further development or use of this three-drug regimen.     

A phase I study of weekly docetaxel, 24-hour infusion of high-dose fluorouracil/leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of both docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered weekly in a regimen of docetaxel, 5-FU/leucovorin and cisplatin (DFLP) for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients with chemo-naive, advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were enrolled in the study. Cisplatin and leucovorin dosages were fixed throughout the study at 30 and 300 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU dosage was fixed at 1,600 mg/m2 while docetaxel was evaluated at weekly 1-hour infusion dosages of 30, 40 and 50 mg/m2 to determine the MTD. Cisplatin, 5-FU and leucovorin were administered together as a 24-hour continuous infusion following docetaxel. Weekly 5-FU dosages of 1,600, 2,000 and 2,400 mg/m2 were then evaluated after setting the docetaxel dosage at the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 95 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of three cycles per patient. The MTD of docetaxel was defined at 40 mg/m2. At a docetaxel dosage of 50 mg/m2 per week, the dose-limiting events of grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 hypomagnesemia occurred. With fixation of docetaxel to 40 mg/m2, the DLT for 5-FU was found at 2,400 mg/m2 per week. This incurred grade 4 neutropenia such that the MTD of 5-FU was defined at 2,000 mg/m2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (45%), with 2 patients developing febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 and 3 hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia occurred in 9 (41%) and 4 (18%) patients, respectively, of the first 22 patients treated with a 24-hour infusion of cisplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin immediately following docetaxel. Following a change in the cisplatin administration schedule to a 3-hour infusion after 5-FU/leucovorin infusion, no such complications were observed in 9 subsequently treated patients. Grade 2 diarrhea was recorded in 11 patients (35%). Grade 2/3 asthenia occurred in 9 patients (30%), which resolved after correction of electrolyte disorders. Twenty-six patients were assessable for response analysis. There were 2 (7.8%) complete and 14 (53.8%) partial responses, with the overall response rate being 61.5% (95% confidence interval, 41.5-81.6%). Responses were observed at all dose levels. CONCLUSION: Two consecutive weeks of DFLP infusions every 3 weeks appear to be an active regimen with a tolerable toxicity profile in advanced gastric cancer. For further phase II studies, the recommended dose for this combination is 40 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 2,000 mg/m2 of 5-FU per week.     

Phase I clinical trial of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor to show preliminary evidence of activity against solid tumors. Findings from preclinical studies prompted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with recurring/refractory advanced solid tumors. The effect of gemcitabine on proteasome inhibition by bortezomib in whole blood was also investigated. METHODS: Bortezomib was administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Groups of > or =3 patients were evaluated at each dose level. Escalating doses of gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) with bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) to 1.5 mg/m(2) were planned. RESULTS: There were no DLTs in patients receiving bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) in the first 3 dose levels. Dose-limiting nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal obstruction, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 of 5 evaluable patients in dose level 4 (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2)), establishing bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as the MTD. Most common Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia (6 patients), thrombocytopenia (5 patients), gastrointestinal disorders (6 patients), and general disorders (4 patients) such as fatigue. One patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. Inhibition of 20S proteasome activity by bortezomib was unaffected by gemcitabine coadministration. CONCLUSION: Dosages of bortezomib and gemcitabine suitable for further evaluation of antitumor activity have been established.     

Phase I trial of strictly time-scheduled gemcitabine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Maximal therapeutic gain in xenograft sarcoma and toxicity for jejunal mucosa is time dependent for concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT). We used a time-dependent schedule to determine the maximal-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3 other toxicity). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 33), periampullary carcinoma (n = 1), or bile duct cancer (n = 2) were treated with 3-day conformal RT with 50.4 Gy (tumor, lymphatics) plus a 5.4-Gy boost. Concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 29-33) and gemcitabine (initially 600 mg/m(2), weekly on Fridays 68 h before RT) were administered. Because of DLT, the doses were reduced to 500 mg/m(2) weekly and then 500, 400, or 300 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 5, 26, 33. RESULTS: DLT occurred at all dose levels of gemcitabine >300 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were treated at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) without DLT. The response to chemoradiation allowed 10 of 30 initially unresectable patients with primary pancreatic carcinoma to undergo radical surgery, including a complete response in 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: At the recommended Phase II dose, chemoradiation with gemcitabine and cisplatin can be administered safely in pancreatic carcinoma. However, at higher dose levels, toxicity is severe and frequent. Patients with a chance for conversion to resection could benefit from this schedule.     

Phase II trial alternating FOLFOX-6 and FOLFIRI regimens in second-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIREFOX study)

We assessed a schedule alternating 4 FOLFOX and 4 FOLFIRI cycles in 39 patients with 5-FU resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients alternatively received 4 FOLFOX-6 cycles (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2), leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) d1 followed by bolus 400 mg/m(2) 5-FU and by a 46-hour 2,400 mg/m(2) 5-FU infusion, every 2 weeks), and 4 FOLFIRI cycles (oxaliplatin replaced by irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) d1) until progression or limiting toxicity. Eigteen patients achieved an objective response (46.1 percent). Median progression-free and overall survivals were 8.8 and 18.7 months, respectively. Only 2 patients (5.1 percent) had Grade 3 oxaliplatin-related sensory-neuropathy. This schedule had so promising efficacy and safety.     

A phase I study of radiation therapy and twice-weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: In vitro studies suggest that low-dose gemcitabine sensitizes cells to radiation therapy and that this effect persists for 48 h after drug exposure. Cisplatin is a radiation sensitizer and is also synergistic with gemcitabine in some in vitro tumor systems. Gemcitabine's radiosensitizing properties can theoretically be exploited by twice-weekly administration. This study assessed toxicity in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiation therapy, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given twice weekly for 3 weeks during radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 5 mg/m(2) i.v. The starting dose for cisplatin was 5 mg/m(2). Chemotherapy doses escalated every 3 to 6 patients according to a standard Phase I study design. RESULTS: Twenty-four evaluable patients, all with pancreatic cancer, were treated on this protocol. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2, and Grade 4 lymphopenia occurred in 1. There was no clear relationship between chemotherapy dose and hematologic toxicity. The most common Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxic responses were vomiting (7 patients) and nausea (7 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose Level 6 (gemcitabine 45 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.). Six patients were treated at dose Level 5 (gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.) without dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly may be given concurrently with radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with acceptable toxicity.     

Dose-intense PEFG (cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a dose-finding study

The aim of this study was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of an intensified PEFG regimen administered every 14 days to patients with Stage III or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Twenty-nine patients received fixed doses of both epirubicin (30 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14) and of escalating doses of cisplatin and gemcitabine. The MTD was cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2. With respect to classical PEFG, intensified regimen potentially improved the dose-intensity of both cisplatin and epirubicin by 50 percent and of gemcitabine by 33 percent, reduced Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and the number of outpatient accesses.     

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.     

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naive,advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The goals of the current study were to determine the safety and efficacy of a nonplatinum-containing doublet, gemcitabine and docetaxel, in the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-naive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced, chemotherapy-naive NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) administered on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and survival and 27 patients were evaluable for response. RESULTS: This combination was extremely well tolerated with Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 6 of 32 patients (19%) (grading was based on the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). There were two episodes of Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and no episodes of Grade 3 or 4 anemia. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities included nausea (occurring in 1 of 32 patients), diarrhea (occurring in 1 of 32 patients), fatigue (occurring in 10 of 32 patients), fluid retention (occurring in 2 of 32 patients), anorexia (occurring in 4 of 32 patients), and transaminitis (occurring in 2 of 32 patients). Six patients experienced Grade 3 pneumonitis that was at least possibly related to the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel. There was 1 complete response and 7 partial responses for an overall response rate of 30%. The 1-year and median survivals were 35% and 7.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the regimen of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) administered on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days was well tolerated with manageable hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. The responses were comparable to those achieved with platinum-based combination chemotherapy and the 2-year survival was an encouraging 19%. These data would support the further study of this nonplatinum doublet in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve efficacy of single-agent gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, several studies have examined the effects of 5-FU combined with gemcitabine. However, no studies to date have been performed in Japanese patients. We thus conducted a phase I/II study of gemcitabine and infusional 5-FU in Japanese patients to determine a recommended dosage for this combination and clarify efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: Phase I evaluated the frequency of dose limiting toxicity of two 5-FU dosages (400 and 500 mg/m(2)/day) infused continuously over 5 days combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks. Results from phase I determined the recommended dosage to be examined in phase II for effect on survival period, clinical benefit response (CBR), tumor response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 34 chemo-naive patients were entered into the study. All had a Karnofsky performance of > or =50 points and distant metastases. Dose limiting toxicities in phase I determined the recommended 5-FU dosage at 400 mg/m(2)/day. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities (neutropenia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) were the most common severe toxicities. For the 28 patients administered the recommended dosage, 1-year survival rate was 14.3%, median survival time 7.1 months and progression free survival 3.2 months. Seven patients achieved a 25% overall response rate and three showed 27.3% improvement in CBR. CONCLUSION: Although a meaningful survival benefit over single-agent gemcitabine was not demonstrated, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day infused continuously over 5 days in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks appeared to be a moderately effective palliative treatment with low toxicity in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the main drug used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Combination chemotherapy is not always superior to 5-FU alone, especially when biomodulators are also administered. In an attempt to exploit all the cytotoxic mechanisms of 5-FU, we carried out a pilot study with a double route of administration of 5-FU (intravenous bolus and continuous infusion) and a multiple modulation of 5-FU by methotrexate (MTX), 6S-leucovorin (6S-LV) and cisplatin (CDDP). A group of 30 patients affected by advanced gastric cancer was treated with MTX 50 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus on day 1, followed by a 5 day i. v. continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day and 6S-LV 100 mg/m2/day; on day 3 CDDP 100 mg/m2 was also administered. The regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. Six partial responses (20+/-14. 3%), 12 stable diseases (40+/-17.5%) and 12 progression (40+/-17.5%) were observed in an intent-to-treat analysis. Median survival was 7 months. All responding patients had performance status 0-1. Grade 3-4 toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal, but grade 3-4 anemia and leucopenia were also recorded. The schedule has low activity. The use of different modulators and way of administration of 5-FU does not provide advantages in advanced gastric cancer.     

A Phase II trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tree carcinoma

Gemcitabine is a commonly used chemotherapy for biliary tree carcinomas, achieving response rates of 10% to 60%. Preclinical studies indicate that fixed dose rate infusion optimizes accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate and may enhance the clinical activity of gemcitabine. We conducted a phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in 15 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1500 mg/m2 over 150 minutes weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. No complete or partial responses were observed. Two patients (13%) had stable disease lasting a median of 9 weeks. The median time to progression was 9 weeks; median survival was 20 weeks. There was considerable grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity, including neutropenia in 49% of patients, leukopenia in 40%, anemia in 27%, and thrombocytopenia in 27%. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were minimal. We conclude that fixed dose rate gemcitabine results in significant myelosuppression and has minimal activity in patients with biliary tree carcinoma.     

Gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a multicentric phase II study

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is increasing rapidly worldwide. Currently, pemetrexed plus cisplatin chemotherapy showed a survival advantage versus cisplatin alone. No impact on patient survival of surgery, radiotherapy, or their combination has been demonstrated. METHODS: Eight centers in northeastern Italy participated in a Phase II multicenter study. Chemotherapy was comprised of carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15. This cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Between July 1996 and September 2000, 50 patients were treated. Of the sample, 68% were males, 88% had a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, 56% had Stage I-II disease, 68% had epithelioid histology, and 62% had no previous treatments. The delivered dose intensity of gemcitabine was 617 mg/m(2) per week, which was 82% of the planned dose (750 mg/m(2) per week). For carboplatin, the delivered dose intensity was 80 mg/m(2) per week. Overall, 44% of 15th day doses were omitted or reduced. Twenty-six percent of the patients had partial responses (95% confidence interval: 15-40%) and 24% had disease progression. None of the patients had complete responses. The median response duration was 55 weeks (range, 13-113 weeks). Patients had good clinical benefit. For example, 46% had improved dyspnea, 40% improved in weight, and 26% experienced pain reduction. Patients developed Grade 3-4 leukopenia during 18 cycles (11%) of chemotherapy. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently, i.e., there were 24 episodes (15%) among 17 patients. Grade 3 anemia developed among patients during eight cycles (5%). None of the patients developed Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity. The median survival of this sample of patients was 66 weeks with 53%, 30%, and 20% of patients alive at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The median progression-free survival period was 40 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The gemcitabine/carboplatin combination is a valid option in the treatment of MPM due to its acceptable toxicity profile, the good response rate, and the clinical benefit to patients. Minor adjustments in schedule (3-week cycles instead of 4-week cycles) would permit a more optimal treatment administration.     

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in children with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in children with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was given as a 30-minute infusion for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks, to 42 patients aged 1 to 21 years. Doses of 1000, 1200 and 1500 mg/m(2) were administered for 3 weeks. Subsequently, gemcitabine was given for only 2 consecutive weeks at 1500, 1800, and 2100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and its metabolite, 2'2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, were measured in 28 patients. RESULTS: Forty patients who received 132 courses of gemcitabine were assessable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given weekly for 3 weeks was 1200 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen in one-third of children treated at any doses given for 2 weeks. The major toxicity was myelosuppression in three of five patients at 1500 mg/m(2) for 3 weeks, and one of seven patients at 1800 mg/m(2) for 2 weeks. Other serious adverse events were somnolence, fever and hypotension, and rash in three patients. Gemcitabine plasma concentration-time data were fit to a one- (n = 5) or two-compartment (n = 23) open model. Mean gemcitabine clearance and half-life values were 2140 mL/min/m(2) and 13.7 minutes, respectively. One patient with pancreatic cancer had a partial response. Seven patients had stable disease for 2 to 17 months. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine given by 30-minute infusion for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks was tolerated well by children at doses of 2100 mg/m(2) and 1200 mg/m(2), respectively.     

Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 2 weeks as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with leucovorin (LV)-modulated bolus plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; de Gramont schedule) every 2 weeks in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (median age: 69 years) with histologically confirmed and two-dimensionally measurable metastatic CRC were enrolled. The patients' performance status (WHO) was 0 in 14 (44%), 1 in 15 (47%), and 2 in 3 (9%) patients. Twenty (62.5%) patients had at least two metastatic sites. LV was administered at a dose of 200 mg/m2/day as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by 5-FU as an intravenous bolus at the dose of 400 mg/m2 and then, as a 22-hour continuous infusion at the dose of 600 mg/m2/day for 2 consecutive days. L-OHP was administered on day 1 at the dose of 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion in parallel with LV but using different infusion lines. Treatment was administered every 2 weeks. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 2 (6.2%) complete and 9 (28%) partial responses (28%; odds ratio 34.2%; 95% confidence interval 17.92-50.83%) were achieved while 8 (25%) patients had stable disease and 13 (41%) progressive disease. The median duration of response was 5 months, but the median time to progression has not yet been reached. After a median follow-up period of 11 months, the median survival has not yet been attained, but the projected probability for 1-year survival was 72%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 16 (50%) patients while 1 (3%) of them developed febrile neutropenia. There was no treatment-related death. Peripheral neuropathy grade 2 and > or =3 occurred in 5 (16%) and 7 (21%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The bimonthly administration of L-OHP in association with LV-modulated bolus plus infusional 5-FU ('de Gramont' regimen) is a well-tolerated and effective front-line treatment for metastatic CRC.