Evaluation of drug‐drug interaction potential between omecamtiv mecarbil and rosuvastatin,a BCRP substrate,with a clinical study in healthy subjects and using a physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic model

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel cardiac myosin activator in development for the treatment of heart failure. In vitro, OM is an inhibitor of BCRP. Rosuvastatin, a BCRP substrate, is one of the most commonly prescribed medications in patients with heart failure. The potential for a pharmacokinetic (PK) drug‐drug interaction (DDI) was investigated, specifically to determine whether a single 50 mg dose of OM would impact the PKs of a single 10 mg dose of rosuvastatin in an open‐label study in 14 healthy subjects. The ratios of the geometric least‐square means (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of rosuvastatin co‐administered with OM compared to rosuvastatin alone were 127.1% (90% CI 113.8–141.9), 132.8% (90% CI 120.7–146.1), and 154.2% (90% CI 132.8–179.1) for area under the plasma‐concentration time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf), area under the plasma‐concentration time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC_last), and maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max), respectively. Whereas the DDI study with rosuvastatin was conducted with the co‐administration of a single dose of OM, in the clinical setting, patients receive OM at doses of 25, 37.5, or 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Hence, to extrapolate the results of the DDI study to a clinically relevant scenario of continuous b.i.d. dosing with OM, physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was performed to explore the potential of BCRP inhibition following continuous b.i.d. dosing of OM at the highest 50 mg dose. Modeling results indicated that following 50 mg b.i.d. dosing of OM, the predicted ratios of the geometric means (90% CIs) for rosuvastatin AUC_inf and C_max were 1.18 (90% CI 1.16–1.20) and 2.04 (90% CI 1.99–2.10), respectively. Therefore, these results suggest that OM, following multiple dose administration, is a weak inhibitor of BCRP substrates and is in accordance with that observed in the single dose OM DDI clinical study.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a cardiac myosin activator and is currently under investigation for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study investigated the drug‐drug interaction (DDI) potential of OM on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin, a BCRP substrate, using a clinical study and a physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

The clinical study and PBPK modeling analyses confirm that OM is expected to be a weak inhibitor of BCRP in the clinical setting.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

This study highlights the DDI potential of single doses of OM for BCRP substrates from a clinical study and demonstrates the importance of the PBPK modeling approach to investigate DDI effects following multiple doses of OM at therapeutic concentrations.     

Safety,tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oral baicalein tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: A single‐center,randomized, double‐blind,placebo‐controlled multiple‐ascending‐dose study

Baicalein is a biologically important flavonoid in extracted from the Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, which can effectively inhibit the influenza virus. This study aimed to analyze the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of baicalein tablets in healthy Chinese subjects and provide more information for phase II clinical trials. In this multiple‐ascending‐dose placebo‐controlled trial, 36 healthy subjects were randomized to receive 200, 400, and 600 mg of baicalein tablet or placebo once daily on day 1 and day 10, 3 times daily on days 4–9. All groups were intended to produce safety and tolerability outcomes (lowest dose first). Blood and urine samples were collected from subjects in the 600 mg group for baicalein PK analysis. Our study had shown that Baicalein tablet was generally safe and well‐tolerated. All adverse events were mild and resolved without any intervention except one case of fever reported in the 600 mg group, which was considered as moderate but not related with baicalein as judged by the investigator. Oral baicalein tablets were rapidly absorbed with peak plasma levels being reached within 2 h after multiple administration. The highest urinary excretion of baicalein and its metabolites peaked in 2 h, followed by 12 h, with a double peak trend.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Many studies have shown that baicalin has an anti‐influenza effect in cell and animal experiments. The primary mechanism of action is that baicalein has a strong inhibitory effect on the sialidase of the influenza virus.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study aimed to analyze the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of baicalein tablets in healthy Chinese subjects and provide more information for phase II clinical trials.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Our study results have shown that baicalein tablets were administered multiple times within the studied dose range were safe and well‐tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects with no serious or severe adverse effects. The highest urinary excretion of baicalein and its metabolites peaked in 2 h, followed by 12 h, with a double peak trend. Oral baicalein tablets were rapidly absorbed with peak plasma levels reached within 2 h after multiple administration.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Our study addresses the safety outcomes of baicalein tablets and emphasizes the PKs of baicalein, which provides a better understanding and a scientific basis of the clinical application of baicalein for further evaluation.     

Single‐dose of LC51‐0255, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator,showed dose‐dependent and reversible reduction of absolute lymphocyte count in humans

Reducing the peripheral absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is a promising therapeutic approach in treating autoimmune diseases. LC51‐0255 is a sphingosine‐1‐phosphate 1 receptor modulator, which is known to decrease the peripheral ALC. We aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), safety, and tolerability profiles of LC51‐0255 after a single oral administration in healthy subjects. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalation study was conducted in 50 healthy subjects. Each subject orally received LC51‐0255 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg) or its matching placebo in an 8:2 ratio. Blood and urine samples were collected to assess the PKs, and PDs was evaluated using peripheral ALC and 24‐h hourly heart rate data. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG), continuous 24‐h ECG (via Holter monitoring), clinical laboratory tests, ophthalmologic tests, pulmonary function tests, and physical examinations. A single dose of LC51‐0255 reduced ALC and heart rate in a reversible and dose‐dependent manner. Systemic exposure of LC51‐0255 increased dose‐dependently and its half‐life ranged from 72.2 to 134.0 h. ALC and the systemic exposure of LC51‐0255 seemed to be negatively correlated. LC51‐0255 was well‐tolerated up to 2 mg, and the most common TEAE was bradycardia. The results of this study suggest that LC51‐0255 can be developed into a beneficial treatment option for autoimmune disease.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Reducing the peripheral absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is a promising therapeutic approach to treat autoimmune diseases. Sphingosine‐1‐phosphate 1 (S1P₁) receptor modulator reduces peripheral ALC by preventing the recirculation of lymphocytes from lymphatic tissue to target organs.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

We performed this study to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability profiles of LC51‐0255, a novel S1P₁ receptor modulator, in humans.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Our results showed that LC51‐0255 has a relatively long half‐life, is well‐tolerated, and reduces ALC in a dose‐dependent and reversible manner.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Our results provide evidence that a single dose of LC51‐0255 can be further developed into a beneficial treatment option for patients with autoimmune disease.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of itepekimab in healthy adults and patients with asthma: Phase I first‐in‐human and first‐in‐patient trials

Itepekimab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin (IL‐33) and has been shown to reduce airway inflammation and associated tissue damage in preclinical studies. We assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamic profiles of single‐ascending and multiple‐ascending doses of itepekimab in two randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase I studies. Healthy adults (N = 40) were randomized to the single‐dose study and patients with moderate asthma (N = 23) to the multiple‐dose study. Itepekimab was administered intravenously (0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg infusion) or subcutaneously (150 mg) in the single‐dose study and subcutaneously (75 or 150 mg weekly for 4 weeks) in the multiple‐dose study. Itepekimab exhibited linear PKs across studies and dose‐proportional increases in mean maximum concentration in serum and area under the concentration–time curve following single intravenous or multiple subcutaneous doses. Itepekimab demonstrated mean subcutaneous bioavailability of 59–73% and a long terminal half‐life (30.0–31.6 days). IL‐33 concentrations in most healthy participants and patients with asthma were undetectable at baseline. Following administration of itepekimab in both studies, total IL‐33 concentrations increased and blood eosinophils decreased, both with durable effect. Itepekimab was well‐tolerated in both studies with no detection of treatment‐emergent anti‐drug antibody responses.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Preclinical data suggest that itepekimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL‐33, may benefit patients with chronic inflammatory airway diseases by blocking IL‐33–mediated pathologic inflammation. Neither the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of itepekimab nor its safety has been fully elucidated in first‐in‐human or first‐in‐patient studies.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

The study evaluated the initial safety of itepekimab, and its PK and pharmacodynamic activity in healthy adults and patients with asthma.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Itepekimab demonstrated linear and dose‐proportional PKs in our studies and was well‐tolerated, with no evidence of immunogenicity. These findings have facilitated dose and regimen selection for subsequent clinical studies in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Itepekimab is one of a few anti‐alarmin biologics under development; if successful, it may provide an alternative mechanism of action with which to target chronic inflammatory airway diseases, alone or in combination with other targeted therapies.     

Required dose of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of vecuronium‐induced shallow residual neuromuscular block at a train‐of‐four ratio of 0.3

Residual shallow neuromuscular block (NMB) is potentially harmful and contributes to critical respiratory events. Evidence for the optimal dose of sugammadex required to reverse vecuronium‐induced shallow NMB is scarce. The aims of the present study were to find suitable doses of sugammadex and neostigmine to reverse a residual vecuronium‐induced NMB from a time of flight (TOF) ratio of 0.3–0.9 and evaluate their safety and efficacy. In total, 121 patients aged 18–65 years were randomly assigned to 11 groups to receive placebo, sugammadex (doses of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg), or neostigmine (doses of 10, 25, 40, 55, or 70 μg/kg). The reversal time of sugammadex and neostigmine to antagonize a vecuronium‐induced shallow residual NMB (i.e., TOF ratio of 0.3) and related adverse reactions were recorded. Several statistical models were tested to find an appropriate statistical model to explore the suitable doses of sugammadex and neostigmine required to reverse a residual vecuronium‐induced NMB. Based on a monoexponential model with the response variable on a logarithmic scale, sugammadex 0.56 mg/kg may be sufficient to reverse vecuronium‐induced shallow residual NMB at a TOF ratio of 0.3 under anesthesia maintained with propofol. Neostigmine may not provide prompt and satisfactory antagonism as sugammadex, even in shallow NMB.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Sugammadex 4 and 2 mg/kg can effectively reverse deep and moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by aminosteroidal NMB agents, respectively. The optimal dose of sugammadex required to reverse vecuronium on shallow NMB has not yet been evaluated, and whether neostigmine can provide the same satisfactory antagonism as sugammadex in vecuronium‐induced shallow NMB remains unknown.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This analysis of a single‐center, randomized, double‐blind trial evaluated biological models to find an appropriate model to explore suitable doses of sugammadex and neostigmine to reverse residual vecuronium‐induced NMB from a time of flight (TOF) ratio of 0.3 to 0.9.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Sugammadex 0.56 mg/kg may be sufficient to reverse vecuronium‐induced shallow residual NMB at a TOF ratio of 0.3 under anesthesia maintained with propofol. Neostigmine may not provide antagonism as satisfactory as the sugammadex dose due to its less stable recovery time and higher incidence of recurarization even in shallow NMB.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

A small dose of sugammadex—0.56 mg/kg—can satisfactorily reverse vecuronium‐induced shallow NMB at a TOF ratio of 0.3. If doctors use the required dose of sugammadex, it will promote rational drug use and avoid some side effects of excessive medication.     

Evaluation of moxifloxacin in canine and non‐human primate telemetry assays: Comparison of QTc interval prolongation by timepoint and concentration‐QTc analysis

The in vivo correct QT (QTc) assay is used by the pharmaceutical industry to characterize the potential for delayed ventricular repolarization and is a core safety assay mentioned in International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7B guideline. The typical telemetry study involves a dose‐response analysis of QTc intervals over time using a crossover (CO) design. This method has proven utility but does not include direct integration of pharmacokinetic (PK) data. An alternative approach has been validated and is used routinely in the clinical setting that pairs pharmacodynamic (PD) responses with PK exposure (e.g., concentration‐QTc (C‐QTc) analysis. The goal of our paper was to compare the QTc sensitivity of two experimental approaches in the conscious dog and non‐human primate (NHP) QTc assays. For timepoint analysis, a conventional design using eight animals (8 × 4 CO) to detect moxifloxacin‐induced QTc prolongation was compared to a PK/PD design in a subset (N = 4) of the same animals. The findings demonstrate that both approaches are equally sensitive in detecting threshold QTc prolongation on the order of 10 ms. Both QTc models demonstrated linearity in the QTc prolongation response to moxifloxacin dose escalation (6 to 46 ms). Further, comparison with human QTc findings with moxifloxacin showed agreement and consistent translation across the three species: C‐QTc slope values were 0.7‐ (dog) and 1.2‐ (NHP) fold of the composite human value. In conclusion, our data show that dog and NHP QTc telemetry with an integrated PK arm (C‐QTc) has the potential to supplement clinical evaluation and improve integrated QTc risk assessment.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Typical cardiovascular studies usually employ timepoint analysis. Published in vivo corrected QT (QTc) assay data has exhibited variability in QTc sensitivity that results in challenges in nonclinical‐clinical assessment of translation.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

Comparison of nonclinical timepoint and concentration QTc (C‐QTc) analyses and how it relates to clinical moxifloxacin data.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Dog and non‐human primate (NHP) QTc timepoint and C‐QTc analyses detect QTc internal prolongation, have equivalent sensitivity, and improve confidence in these models for proarrhythmic risk mitigation.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Risk assessment in nonclinical models translates well to human thorough QT (TQT) data for moxifloxacin. The new data highlights the value of a high‐quality dog or NHP QTc assay to support clinical risk assessment and regulatory decision making.     

First‐in‐human study of milvexian,an oral,direct, small molecule factor XIa inhibitor

Milvexian (BMS‐986177/JNJ‐70033093) is a small molecule, active‐site inhibitor of factor XIa (FXIa) being developed to prevent and treat thrombotic events. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of milvexian were assessed in a two‐part, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study in healthy adults. Participants in SAD panels (6 panels of 8 participants; n = 48) were randomized (3:1) to receive milvexian (4, 20, 60, 200, 300, or 500 mg) or placebo. The 200‐ and 500‐mg panels investigated the pharmacokinetic impact of a high‐fat meal. Participants in MAD panels (7 panels of 8 participants; n = 56) were randomized (3:1) to receive milvexian (once‐ or twice‐daily) or placebo for 14 days. All milvexian dosing regimens were safe and well‐tolerated, with only mild treatment‐emergent adverse events and no clinically significant bleeding events. In SAD panels, maximum milvexian plasma concentration occurred 3 h postdose in all fasted panels. The terminal half‐life (T_1/2) ranged from 8.3 to 13.8 h. In fasted panels from 20 to 200 mg, absorption was dose‐proportional; results at higher doses (300 and 500 mg) were consistent with saturable absorption. Food increased milvexian bioavailability in a dose‐dependent fashion. In MAD panels, steady‐state milvexian plasma concentration was reached within 3 and 6 dosing days with once‐ and twice‐daily dosing, respectively. Renal excretion was less than 20% in all panels. Prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time was observed and was directly related to drug exposure. These results suggest that the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD properties of milvexian are suitable for further clinical development.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Factor XI (FXI) amplifies thrombin generation and has a limited role in hemostasis. Targeted FXI inhibition may reduce the burden of vascular and thromboembolic diseases while preserving hemostasis.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of the selective, direct, small molecule FXIa inhibitor milvexian.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Single and multiple ascending doses of milvexian up to 500 mg were generally safe and well‐tolerated, with no clinically significant bleeding events. Milvexian plasma concentration was dose proportional at doses up to 200 mg q.d. The milvexian half‐life is suitable for q.d. or b.i.d. dosing. Milvexian exhibited low renal excretion and low overall variability in PK and PD parameters.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

These results can inform the future clinical development of milvexian.     

Pharmacogenetic variants and risk of remdesivir‐associated liver enzyme elevations in Million Veteran Program participants hospitalized with COVID‐19

Remdesivir is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved drug for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). We conducted a retrospective pharmacogenetic study to examine remdesivir‐associated liver enzyme elevation among Million Veteran Program participants hospitalized with COVID‐19 between March 15, 2020, and June 30, 2021. Pharmacogene phenotypes were assigned using Stargazer. Linear regression was performed on peak log‐transformed enzyme values, stratified by population, adjusted for age, sex, baseline liver enzymes, comorbidities, and 10 population‐specific principal components. Patients on remdesivir had higher peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values following treatment initiation compared with patients not receiving remdesivir. Remdesivir administration was associated with a 33% and 24% higher peak ALT in non‐Hispanic White (NHW) and non‐Hispanic Black (NHB) participants (p < 0.001), respectively. In a multivariable model, NHW CYP2C19 intermediate/poor metabolizers had a 9% increased peak ALT compared with NHW normal/rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers (p = 0.015); this association was not observed in NHB participants. In summary, remdesivir‐associated ALT elevations appear to be multifactorial, and further studies are needed.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Remdesivir is associated with liver injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), yet the mechanism of this injury is unknown.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

We utilized a genetically guided approach to investigate whether polymorphisms in drug metabolizing genes or transporters were associated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations following remdesivir treatment.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE

Remdesivir was associated with a 30% increase in peak ALT in patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 which differs by population. Non‐Hispanic White (NHW) individuals with the CYP2C19 intermediate or poor metabolizer phenotype experienced a higher peak ALT than NHW individuals with normal, rapid, or ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Pharmacogenetic approaches to investigation of severe adverse events may be useful in elucidating the mechanisms of drug metabolism and toxicity.     

A randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐ and positive‐controlled crossover study of the effects of durlobactam on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects

Durlobactam (formerly ETX2514) is a diazabicyclooctane β‐lactamase inhibitor that inhibits class A, C, and D β‐lactamases. Sulbactam combined with durlobactam has in vitro and in vivo activity against Acinetobacter baumannii including carbapenem‐ and colistin‐resistant isolates and is being developed for treating serious infections due to A. baumannii. The effect of a single supratherapeutic dose of durlobactam on the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) was evaluated in healthy subjects in a placebo‐ and active‐controlled, single‐infusion, three‐way crossover study. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 6 sequences that included a single 3‐h i.v. infusion of durlobactam 4 g (supratherapeutic dose), a single 3‐h i.v. infusion of placebo, and a single 3‐h i.v. infusion of placebo plus a single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg given open‐label at the end of the i.v. infusion. In each treatment period, Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were obtained from predose through 24 h post‐start of infusion. For the primary ECG end point, placebo‐corrected change‐from‐baseline corrected QT Fridericia’s formula (ΔΔQTcF), no significant change was observed with durlobactam. A concentration‐QT analysis demonstrated no significant effect of durlobactam on ECG parameters, including QT interval prolongation. Thus, durlobactam has a low risk for prolonging the QT interval and is unlikely to produce any proarrhythmic effects.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Drug‐induced prolongation of the QT interval has the potential to cause severe, potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. A number of antimicrobial agents, including fluoroquinolones and macrolides, are associated with a low, but clinically significant increased risk of QT prolongation.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study evaluated the effect of a single supratherapeutic dose of durlobactam on the heart rate corrected QT interval in healthy subjects to determine if there were any potentials for proarrhythmic effects.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

This study found that durlobactam had a low risk for prolonging the QT interval and is unlikely to produce any proarrhythmic effects.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Because durlobactam had a low risk for prolonging the QT interval alone and when co‐administered with sulbactam, clinicians should be confident in administering the combination without risk for proarrhythmic effects.     

Safety,tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single‐ and multiple‐dose administration of islatravir (MK‐8591) in adults without HIV

Islatravir (MK‐8591) is a nucleoside analogue in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV‐1. Two phase 1 trials were conducted during initial evaluation of islatravir: rising single doses (Study 1) and rising multiple doses (Study 2) of oral islatravir in male and female participants without HIV (aged 18–60 years). Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of islatravir (plasma) and islatravir‐triphosphate (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) were assessed. In Study 1, 24 participants, assigned to 1 of 3 panels, received alternating single doses of islatravir in a fasted state from 5 mg to 400 mg, or placebo, over 3 dosing periods; a 30 mg dose was additionally assessed following a high‐fat meal. In Study 2, 8 participants per dose received 3 once‐weekly doses of 10, 30, or 100 mg islatravir or placebo in a fasted state. For each panel in both trials, 6 participants received active drug and 2 received placebo. Islatravir was generally well‐tolerated, with no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Islatravir was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration 0.5 hours); plasma half‐life was 49–61 h; intracellular islatravir‐triphosphate half‐life was 118–171 h. Plasma exposure increased in an approximately dose‐proportional manner; there was no meaningful food effect. There was a modest degree of intracellular islatravir‐triphosphate accumulation after multiple weekly dosing. After single oral doses of islatravir greater than or equal to 5 mg, intracellular islatravir‐triphosphate levels were comparable to levels associated with efficacy in preclinical studies. These results warrant continued clinical investigation of islatravir.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

​Current HIV treatment and prevention strategies have limitations, and novel agents that offer improved safety and tolerability, a high barrier to HIV resistance, and more convenient dosing regimens are required.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

Two phase 1 studies in participants without HIV assessed safety and pharmacokinetics of rising single and multiple doses of oral islatravir, a nucleoside analogue, to support continued development for the treatment and prevention of HIV‐1 infection.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Islatravir was generally well‐tolerated at single doses up to 400 mg. Oral doses of islatravir greater than or equal to 10 mg resulted in intracellular peripheral blood mononuclear cell levels of the active form, islatravir‐triphosphate, comparable to those associated with antiviral efficacy in preclinical studies.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

These studies provide important safety and pharmacokinetic information about islatravir in adults without HIV, which will be used to support further clinical investigation of islatravir for the treatment and prevention of HIV‐1 infection.     

Phase I and scintigraphy studies to evaluate safety,tolerability, pharmacokinetics,and lung deposition of inhaled GDC‐0214 in healthy volunteers

Several inflammatory cytokines that promote inflammation and pathogenesis in asthma signal through the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) pathway. This phase I, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple ascending doses up to 15 mg twice daily for 14 days of a JAK1 inhibitor, GDC‐0214, in healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 66). Doses were administered with a dry powder, capsule‐based inhaler. An accompanying open‐label gamma scintigraphy study in HVs examined the lung deposition of a single dose of inhaled Technetium‐99m (^99mTc)‐radiolabeled GDC‐0214. GDC‐0214 plasma concentrations were linear and approximately dose‐proportional after both single and multiple doses. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at 15–30 min after dosing. The mean apparent elimination half‐life ranged from 32 to 56 h across all single and multiple dose cohorts. After single and multiple doses, all adverse events were mild or moderate, and none led to treatment withdrawal. There was no clear evidence of systemic toxicity due to JAK1 inhibition, and systemic exposure was low, with plasma concentrations at least 15‐fold less than the plasma protein binding‐corrected IC50 of JAK1 at the highest dose. Scintigraphy showed that approximately 50% of the emitted dose of radiolabeled GDC‐0214 was deposited in the lungs and was distributed well to the peripheral airways. ^99mTc‐radiolabeled GDC‐0214 (1 mg) exhibited a mean plasma C_max similar to that observed in phase I at the same dose level. Overall, inhaled GDC‐0214 exhibited pharmacokinetic properties favorable for inhaled administration.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Many factors drive asthma pathogenesis, including several cytokines that signal through the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) pathway. Inhibition of JAK1 is a possible target for asthma treatments, but previous studies show oral JAK1 inhibitors lead to increased risk of severe infections, malignancy and cardiovascular events.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and lung deposition of GDC‐0214, an inhaled JAK1 inhibitor designed to target the lungs.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Inhaled delivery of a JAK inhibitor for 14 days exhibited low systemic exposure, leading to few adverse events and limited systemic toxicity, while demonstrating high deposition in the lungs.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Local pulmonary application of JAK inhibitors may be an effective treatment for asthma with limited systemic risks.     

Propsective evaluation of high‐dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics in adult patients with lymphoma using novel determinants of kidney function

High‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX) pharmacokinetics (PKs), including the best estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation that reflects methotrexate (MTX) clearance, requires investigation. This prospective, observational, single‐center study evaluated adult patients with lymphoma treated with HDMTX. Samples were collected at predefined time points up to 96 h postinfusion. MTX and 7‐hydroxy‐MTX PKs were estimated by standard noncompartmental analysis. Linear regression determined which serum creatinine‐ or cystatin C‐based eGFR equation best predicted MTX clearance. The 80 included patients had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 68.6 years (IQR 59.2–75.6), 54 (67.5%) were men, and 74 (92.5%) were White. The median (IQR) dose of MTX was 7.6 (IQR 4.8–11.3) grams. Median clearance was similar across three dosing levels at 4.5–5.6 L/h and was consistent with linear PKs. Liver function, weight, age, sex, concomitant chemotherapy, and number of previous MTX doses did not impact clearance. MTX area under the curve (AUC) values varied over a fourfold range and appeared to increase in proportion to the dose. The eGFR_cys (ml/min) equation most closely correlated with MTX clearance in both the entire cohort and after excluding outlier MTX clearance values (r = 0.31 and 0.51, respectively). HDMTX as a 4‐h infusion displays high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Population PK modeling to optimize MTX AUC attainment requires further evaluation. The cystatin C‐based eGFR equation most closely estimated MTX clearance and should be investigated for dosing and monitoring in adults requiring MTX as part of lymphoma management.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Methotrexate (MTX) clearance has a relationship with glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which is often calculated using serum creatinine as a surrogate marker of renal clearance; however, kidney function estimation derived from serum creatinine‐based GFR formulas has several known limitations, particularly in patients with cancer.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study attempts to answer the question of which estimated GFR (eGFR) equation has the strongest correlation with MTX clearance.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Results of this study suggest that, when high‐dose MTX is administered, cystatin C based eGFR equations more strongly correlate with MTX clearance than eGFR equations based on serum creatinine alone.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Incorporating cystatin C into baseline evaluation when estimating kidney function has potential to improve MTX safety and optimize MTX exposure.     

Effect of difelikefalin,a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist,on respiratory depression: A randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial

Difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist designed to limit central nervous system (CNS) penetration, is under development for the treatment of pruritus. Its hydrophilic, small‐peptidic structure limits CNS entry, minimizing potential CNS‐mediated adverse events (AEs). This study assessed the effect of difelikefalin on key relevant measures of respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. This single‐center, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, three‐way crossover study enrolled healthy, nonsmoking volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment sequences of difelikefalin (1.0 or 5.0 mcg/kg i.v.) or placebo on sequential days with an intervening 24 (±2) h washout period. The primary end points included incidence of increased end‐tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg versus baseline or a level greater than 50 mm Hg sustained greater than or equal to 30 seconds, and incidence of reduction in saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO₂) to less than 92% sustained greater than or equal to 30 seconds. Secondary end points included incidence of reduced respiratory rate and other safety assessments. Fifteen subjects were randomized and completed the study. No subject on placebo or difelikefalin met the increased ETCO₂ or reduced SpO₂ primary end point criteria for respiratory depression. All respiratory measures in each group remained near baseline values during 4‐h postdose observations. No subject met the reduced respiratory rate criterion or experienced clinically significant changes in ETCO₂, SpO₂, or respiratory rate. The most commonly reported treatment‐emergent AEs (TEAEs; ≥20% of subjects) were paresthesia, hypoesthesia, and somnolence in the difelikefalin arms. All TEAEs were mild and resolved without intervention. Difelikefalin 1.0 and 5.0 mcg/kg i.v. did not produce respiratory depression.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Severe respiratory depression is a life‐threatening complication of inappropriate use of mu opioid receptor agonists. Difelikefalin, a peripherally restricted kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonist, has not demonstrated evidence of compromised respiratory safety.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study evaluated whether difelikefalin, a selective and potent KOR agonist, induces respiratory depression.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

This study helps to expand on the safety profile for difelikefalin. Difelikefalin did not produce respiratory depression in healthy volunteers at doses that were 2 to 10 times higher than those observed to be therapeutically effective in clinical trials of patients with chronic kidney disease–associated pruritus.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

KOR agonists may be potentially safe and effective therapeutics. Difelikefalin is currently being evaluated for chronic kidney disease‐associated pruritus and other chronic pruritic conditions.     

First‐in‐human trial assessing the pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic profile of a novel recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in healthy women and men of reproductive age

The purpose of this first‐in‐human trial was to examine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a novel recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG; FE 999302, choriogonadotropin beta) to support its clinical development for various therapeutic indications. The single and multiple dose PK of choriogonadotropin beta (CG beta) were evaluated in women and the single dose PK and PD of CG beta were compared to those of CG alfa in men. CG beta was safe and well‐tolerated in all 84 healthy subjects. In women, the area under the curve (AUC) and the peak serum concentration (C_max) increased approximately dose proportionally following single and multiple doses of CG beta. The apparent clearance (CL/F) was ~ 0.5 L/h, the mean terminal half‐life (t_½) ~ 45 h and the apparent distribution volume (V_z/F) ~ 30 L. After single administration in men, the mean AUC was 1.5‐fold greater for CG beta than for CG alfa. Mean C_max and V_z/F were comparable for the 2 preparations. In accordance with the differences in AUC, the CL/F was lower for CG beta (CL/F 0.5 vs. 0.8 L/h), explained by a longer t_½ (47 vs. 32 h). Serum testosterone levels induced by a single dose rhCG reflected the PK profiles with a slight delay, resulting in 59% higher AUC for CG beta. The PK parameters for CG beta were comparable in men and in women. In conclusion, the PK differs between the two rhCG preparations, causing higher exposure and a higher PD response for CG beta, which may require relatively lower therapeutic doses.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is indicated for the treatment of male or female infertility and administered by single or multiple subcutaneous injections.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

A new recombinant hCG (rhCG; choriogonadotropin [CG] beta) produced by a human‐derived cell line (PER.C6) is currently in clinical development. The amino acid sequence of the α‐ and β‐chains are identical to the natural sequences and also to that of rhCG expressed by Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell line (CG alfa), but the glycosylation provided by the PER.C6 and CHO cells is different. In this trial, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of choriogonadotropin beta were assessed in women and men and the PKs and pharmacodynamics (PDs) were compared in men to those of CG alfa.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

It is concluded that the PK of the two rhCG preparations are different, due to a slower clearance of CG beta resulting in a higher PD response.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Further development of CG beta may require lower doses of this potent hCG compared to current therapeutic hCG preparations.     

A phase I,randomized, double‐blind,placebo‐controlled,single‐ and multiple dose escalation study evaluating the safety,pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of VX‐128, a highly selective Nav1.8 inhibitor,in healthy adults

Selective inhibition of certain voltage‐gated sodium channels (Na_vs), such as Na_v1.8, is of primary interest for pharmacological pain research and widely studied as a pharmacological target due to its contribution to repetitive firing, neuronal excitability, and pain chronification. VX‐128 is a highly potent and selective Na_v1.8 inhibitor that was being developed as a treatment for pain. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of VX‐128 in healthy subjects in a single‐ and multiple‐ascending dose (MAD) first‐in‐human study. Pharmacodynamics were evaluated in the MAD part using a battery of evoked pain tests. Overall, single doses of VX‐128 up to 300 mg were well‐tolerated, although adverse effect (AE) incidence was higher in subjects receiving VX‐128 (41.7%) compared with placebo (25.0%). After multiple dosing of up to 10 days, skin rash events were observed at all dose levels (up to 100 mg once daily [q.d.]), in five of 26 (19.2%) subjects, including one subject receiving VX‐128 (100 mg q.d.) who had a serious AE of angioedema. A trend in pain tolerance were observed for cold pressor‐ and pressure pain, which was dose‐dependent for the latter. VX‐128 was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration between 1 and 2 h) with a half‐life of ~80 h at 10 mg q.d., and approximately two‐fold accumulation ratio after 10 and 30 mg q.d. Although VX‐128, when given in a multiple dose fashion, resulted in early study termination due to tolerability issues, effects were observed on multiple pain tests that may support further investigation of Na_v1.8 inhibitors as pain treatments.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Selective sodium channel (Na_v) inhibitors have been proposed as an alternative to opioids for pain management. Their potential, however, has yet to be confirmed, as none of the multiple selective Na_v inhibitors that have been investigated for pain management has reached the market.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

We investigated the safety, tolerability, and initial analgesic effects of VX‐128, a novel and highly selective Na_v1.8 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

This is the first study to describe clinical data obtained on the highly selective Na_v1.8 inhibitor VX‐128, and the first to report analgesic effects of this selective Na_v inhibitor in humans. VX‐128 administered as a single dose was well‐tolerated, but dose‐limiting skin rashes occurred after multiple doses resulting in a premature study halt. Although the study had a parallel design and was not necessarily powered to detect pharmacodynamic effects, nociceptive test results suggest that VX‐128 leads to dose‐dependent analgesic effects.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Our findings substantiate research that is performed on evaluating selective Na_v1.8 inhibitors as treatment for pain, and suggests that the cold pressor‐ and pressure pain models are suitable to evaluate selective Na_v1.8 inhibitors.     

The bioequivalence of fixed‐dose combination tablets of bisoprolol and ramipril and its drug‐drug interaction potential

Chronic antihypertensive treatment often includes combination of two or more therapies with complementary mechanism of action targeting different blood pressure (BP) control system. If available, these components are recommended to be administered as a fixed‐dose combination (FDC) to reduce tablet burden, improve adherence and thus BP control. A combination of ramipril (RAMI) and bisoprolol (BISO) is one of the options used in clinical practice and is supported by therapeutic guidelines. The clinical program for a novel BISO/RAMI FDC consisted of two randomized, open‐label, bioequivalence (BE) studies and one drug‐drug interaction (DDI) study. The BE was examined between two FDC strengths of BISO/RAMI (10/10 and 10/5 mg) and the individual reference products administered concomitantly at respective doses after a single oral dose under fasting conditions. In both BE studies, 64 healthy subjects were randomized according to a two‐way crossover design. The DDI study evaluated a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between BISO 10 mg and RAMI 10 mg following their single or concomitant administrations in 30 healthy subjects under fasting condition. BE for BISO/RAMI 10/5 mg and absence of a clinically relevant PK DDI between BISO and RAMI was demonstrated as the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C_max) remained within the acceptance range of 80.00 to 125.00%. However, BE for BISO/RAMI 10/10 mg was not demonstrated, as the lower bound of the 90% CI of C_max for RAMI was outside the acceptance range of BE. Both drugs administered alone or combined were well‐tolerated. No PK interaction was observed between BISO and RAMI/ramiprilat, since the co‐administration of BISO and RAMI 10 mg single doses resulted in comparable rate and extent of absorption for BISO and RAMI when compared to their individual products.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Bisoprolol (BISO) and ramipril (RAMI) have both well‐characterized pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, however, clinical studies for this fixed‐dose combination (FDC) are limited and as per our knowledge, a potential of PK drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) between both compounds has not been evaluated.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

The clinical program was focused on the evaluation of bioequivalence (BE) for two strengths of novel FDCs containing BISO/RAMI in comparison with their free‐combinations and evaluation of potential PK interaction between BISO and RAMI.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

An absence of PK interaction between BISO and RAMI has been demonstrated in the DDI study. The BE studies provided information about in vivo behavior of the FDC, as well as additional PK, and statistical and safety data for BISO and RAMI.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

FDC containing BISO and RAMI may reduce tablet burden, improve adherence to treatment, and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. The administration of BISO and RAMI is not associated with a risk of PK interaction between both compounds.     

Rituximab exposure‐response in triweekly R‐CHOP treatment in DLBCL: A loading dose is recommended to improve clinical outcomes

Previous exposure‐response analyses for rituximab suggest that higher rituximab concentrations were associated with an improvement in efficacy, however, clinical studies investigating a higher rituximab dose had mixed results. To further explore the exposure‐response relationship of rituximab, a prospective observational analysis was performed involving 121 newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma treated with triweekly rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP). The trough concentration in the first cycle (C_1‐trough) was significantly higher in patients achieving complete response (CR) compared with patients that did not achieve CR (22.00 μg/ml vs. 16.62 μg/ml, p = 0.0016), however, this difference between the two groups disappeared in later cycles. The relationship between rituximab C_1‐trough and achieving a CR was confirmed by matched‐pair logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 0.79; p = 0.0020). In addition, a higher C_1‐trough (≥18.40 μg/ml) was associated with longer progression‐free survival (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p = 0.0038). The percentages of patients that did not achieve a CR and had recurrence after CR within 24 months were 35% and 22.50%, respectively, for patients with a C_1‐trough less than or equal to 18.40 μg/ml, compared with 12.35% and 6.17% for patients with C_1‐trough greater than 18.40 μg/ml. Disease stage was found to be the most significant influencing factor of C_1‐trough, with 51.02% of patients at stage IV with an observed C_1‐trough less than 18.40 μg/ml. For these advanced patients, population pharmacokinetic simulations using an established model suggest that a loading dose of 800 mg/m² may help to improve clinical outcomes.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Several studies reported a good clinical response was correlated with a high rituximab concentration, however, not all trials that increased the dosage of rituximab exhibited clinical benefits.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

Systemic investigation is warranted to explore the pharmacokinetic mechanism underlying this confusing dose/concentration‐effect relationship.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

Lower rituximab concentration in the first cycle rather than other cycles was significantly associated with lower complete response rate and early disease recurrence. The recommendatory minimum optimal trough concentration in the first cycle (C_1‐trough) was 18.40 μg/ml, and a loading dose was recommended for advanced patients to obtain optimal exposure. Moreover, correction of hypoproteinemia and liver dysfunction before treatment was recommended to improve clinical benefits.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

The ideal administration of rituximab may involve a high initial dose and then maintenance at modest levels for a sufficient time, and increasing the initial dose of rituximab may be a new direction for future studies.     

The anti‐C5a antibody vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in patients with severe COVID‐19

Recently, we reported the phase II portion of the adaptive phase II/III PANAMO trial exploring potential benefit and safety of selectively blocking C5a with the monoclonal antibody vilobelimab (IFX‐1) in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). The potent anaphylatoxin C5a attracts neutrophils and monocytes to the infection site, causes tissue damage by oxidative radical formation and enzyme releases, and leads to activation of the coagulation system. Results demonstrated that C5a inhibition with vilobelimab was safe and secondary outcomes appeared in favor of vilobelimab. We now report the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of the phase II study. Between March 31 and April 24, 2020, 30 patients with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia confirmed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive vilobelimab plus best supportive care or best supportive care only. Samples for measurement of vilobelimab, C3a and C5a blood concentrations were taken. Vilobelimab predose (trough) drug concentrations in plasma ranged from 84,846 to 248,592 ng/ml (571 to 1674 nM) with a geometric mean of 151,702 ng/ml (1022 nM) on day 2 and from 80,060 to 200,746 ng/ml (539 to 1352 nM) with a geometric mean of 139,503 ng/ml (939 nM) on day 8. After the first vilobelimab infusion, C5a concentrations were suppressed in the vilobelimab group (median 39.70 ng/ml 4.8 nM, IQR 33.20–45.55) as compared to the control group (median 158.53 ng/ml 19.1 nM, IQR 60.03–200.89, p = 0.0006). The suppression was maintained on day 8 (p = 0.001). The current PK/PD analysis shows that vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in patients with severe COVID‐19.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

High concentrations of the potent anaphylatoxin C5a have been reported in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), and the C5a–C5aR1 signaling axis has been suggested to be crucial in COVID‐19 associated inflammation.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

Does the anti‐C5a antibody vilobelimab efficiently inhibit C5a in patients with severe COVID‐19?

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

The current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of the phase II part of the adaptive phase II/III PANAMO trial shows that vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in patients with severe COVID‐19. Our results confirm that C5a is strongly elevated in patients with severe COVID‐19.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

These results suggest a potential important role of C5a‐inhibition for patients with severe COVID‐19. With our previous report on the clinical outcome, this underlines the need to investigate, within the currently enrolling phase III trial, whether C5a‐inhibition may positively impact 28‐day survival in critically ill patients with COVID‐19.     

Polypharmacy influences the renal composite outcome in patients treated with sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors

Polypharmacy is a serious concern in general practice, especially among elder patients; however, the evidence showing significantly poor renal outcomes is not sufficient. This survey was performed to evaluate the effect of polypharmacy on the incidence of the renal composite outcome among a sample of patients with sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) treatment. We assessed 624 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease who received SGLT2i treatment for greater than 1 year. The patients were classified as those with concomitant treatment, that was limited to the medications for hypertension, T2DM, and dyslipidemia, with greater than or equal to seven medications (n = 110) and those with less than seven medications (n = 514). Evaluation of the renal composite outcome was performed by propensity score matching and stratification into quintiles. A subgroup analysis of patients of greater than or equal to 62 years of age and less than 62 years of age was also performed. The incidence of the renal composite outcome was larger in patients with greater than or equal to seven medications than in those with less than seven medications in the propensity score‐matched cohort model (6% vs. 17%, respectively, p = 0.007) and also in the quintile‐stratified analysis (odds ratio [OR], 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI, 1.21–4.12, p = 0.01). The quintile‐stratified analysis of patients of less than 62 years of age—but not those of greater than or equal to 62 years of age—also showed a significant difference (OR, 3.29, 95% CI, 1.41–7.69, p = 0.006). Polypharmacy appears to be associated to the incidence of the renal composite outcome, especially in young patients.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Polypharmacy is an unaddressed concern and may worsen prognosis in clinical practice, especially in elderly patients.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

The evidence that polypharmacy correlates with poor cardiovascular or renal outcomes is insufficient in clinical practice.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

This study clarified the relationship between polypharmacy and a renal composite outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease receiving sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor treatment, especially in young patients.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Both specialists and general practitioners should pay attention to polypharmacy to improve renal outcomes in clinical practice.     

Diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a biomarker and EMR‐based machine learning algorithm for sepsis

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality among hospitalized patients worldwide. Shorter time to administration of broad‐spectrum antibiotics is associated with improved outcomes, but early recognition of sepsis remains a major challenge. In a two‐center cohort study with prospective sample collection from 1400 adult patients in emergency departments suspected of sepsis, we sought to determine the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a machine‐learning algorithm based on clinical data and a set of uncommonly measured biomarkers. Specifically, we demonstrate that a machine‐learning model developed using this dataset outputs a score with not only diagnostic capability but also prognostic power with respect to hospital length of stay (LOS), 30‐day mortality, and 3‐day inpatient re‐admission both in our entire testing cohort and various subpopulations. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for diagnosis of sepsis was 0.83. Predicted risk scores for patients with septic shock were higher compared with patients with sepsis but without shock (p < 0.0001). Scores for patients with infection and organ dysfunction were higher compared with those without either condition (p < 0.0001). Stratification based on predicted scores of the patients into low, medium, and high‐risk groups showed significant differences in LOS (p < 0.0001), 30‐day mortality (p < 0.0001), and 30‐day inpatient readmission (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, a machine‐learning algorithm based on electronic medical record (EMR) data and three nonroutinely measured biomarkers demonstrated good diagnostic and prognostic capability at the time of initial blood culture.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Sepsis represents significant morbidity, mortality, and cost in modern health care. Timely treatment with antibiotics improves outcomes, but it can be difficult to identify patients with sepsis early on in the clinical course.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

Can a machine‐learning algorithm incorporating basic clinical data and nonroutinely measured biomarkers accurately predict sepsis and other related secondary outcomes?

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

A machine‐learning algorithm incorporating basic clinical data and nonroutinely measured biomarkers accurately identify sepsis. Meanwhile, a higher score outputted by the algorithm predicts less favorable outcomes with respect to discharge time, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day inpatient re‐admission.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Earlier treatment of patients who are on a course for poor outcomes has the potential to significantly improve those outcomes. This study suggests that a machine‐learning‐based score may assist clinicians in identifying such patients.