食管癌术后生存10年以上12例分析

1972年以来,我院手术治疗696例食管癌,其中生存10年以上的12例。本文作一分析,以探索有关长期生存的某些因素。     

手术治疗原发性肝癌18例分析

对１８例手术切除的原发性肝癌患者的临床资料进行了总结、分析。认为掌握切除手术指征及肝切除量、严格控制术中肝出血、正确处理肝创面及术后并发症，是保证肝癌手术成功的关键。     

肝癌45例分析

肝癌４５例分析陆伟陈高华曹延哲刘兆江天津市肝病研究所３０００１０主题词肝肿瘤／病毒学肝炎，乙型／并发症Ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔｈｅａｄｉｎｇｓｌｉｖｅｒｎｅｏｐｌａｓｍｓ／ｖｉｒｏｌｏｇｙｈｅｐａｔｉｔｉｓＢ／ｃｏｍｐｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎ分类号Ｒ７３５．７１对象和...     

启东地区肝癌生存率长期趋势分析

目的 对江苏省启东地区1972至201 1年全人群肝癌登记病例进行生存率分析,为预后评价及防治提供依据.方法 收集江苏省启东地区1972至201 1年全人群肝癌登记病例资料,生存(死亡)情况随访截止于2012年4月.用SURV3.01软件计算1至15年观察生存率(OS)及1至15年相对生存率(RS).结果 共收集28 398例登记病例资料.肝癌1、3、5、10、15年OS分别为15.18％、6.23％、4.26％、2.79％及2.39％,1、3、5、10、15年RS分别为15.47％、6.60％、4.69％、3.41％及3.29％.其中男性1、3、5、10、15年OS分别为14.95％、6.05％、4.06％、2.67％及2.26％,1、3、5、10、15年RS分别为15.23％、6.41％、4.47％、3.26％、3.12％;女性1、3、5、10、15年OS分别为15.89％、6.79％、4.87％、3.17％及2.80％,1、3、5、10、15年RS分别为16.20％、7.20％、5.37％、3.87％、3.82％,男女性生存率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).＞ 15岁～≤35岁,＞35岁～≤45岁,＞45岁～≤55岁,＞55岁～≤65岁,＞65岁～≤75岁及＞75岁各年龄组的5年RS分别为4.42％、4.29％、4.96％、4.67％、4.67％、6.35％; 10年RS分别为3.17％、2.98％、3.44％、3.47％、3.75％、11.27％.20世纪80年代以来,肝癌1、3、5、10、15年OS均有上升趋势.结论 启东地区全人群肝癌登记病例总体生存率在逐步提高,早期诊断和治疗方法的进步可能是肝癌生存率提高的影响因素.与发达国家相比,肝癌生存率的差距正在缩小,但仍有提高的空间.     

70岁及以上不可切除的胰腺癌患者生存因素分析

目的 探讨影响70岁及以上不可切除的胰腺癌患者生存的相关因素.方法 总结57例70岁及以上的晚期胰腺癌住院患者的临床资料,分析性别、年龄、既往糖尿病史、胆道疾病史、吸烟史、化疗、放疗、美国东部肿瘤协作组(Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group,ECOG)评分、肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(carcinoembroynic antigen,CEA)和CA199升高情况等对总生存的影响.结果 性别、行为状态、化疗、放疗与生存密切相关.男性和女性比较,中位生存期分别为(10.7±5.4)个月和(5.5±2.3)个月,P=0.000;ECOG评分0～1分和≥2分比较,中位生存期分别为(10.1±5.8)个月和(7.3±3.8)个月,P=0.040;未接受化疗组和接受化疗组比较,中位生存期分别为(7.8±5.3)个月和(11.5±5.0)个月,P=0.038;未接受放疗组和接受放疗组比较,中位生存期分别为(8.9±5.4)个月和(13.7±3.8)个月,P=0.048;差异均有统计学意义.胰腺癌总的中位生存期为8.9个月,1年生存率为28.1%.结论 70岁及以上老年人胰腺癌的预后与性别、行为状态、化疗和放疗相关.对于不可切除但行为状态好的老年胰腺癌患可以考虑化疗,部分患者甚至可以考虑联合放疗.     

特殊表现原发性肝癌210例

特殊表现原发性肝癌２１０例周明果钟家盛广西玉林地区医院内科５３７０００ＳｕｂｊｅｃｔｈｅａｄｉｎｇｓＬｉｖｅｒｎｅｏｐｌａｓｍｓ／ｐａｔｈｏｌｏｇｙ主题词肝肿瘤／病理学中国图书资料分类号Ｒ７３５７我院１９７８－１９９６年收治原发性肝癌６５４例，...     

氩氦刀冷冻消融术治疗180例肝癌临床分析

目的探讨氩氦刀冷冻消融术治疗肝癌方法的安全性和近期疗效。方法选择180例肝癌患者在超声引导下行经皮穿刺氩氦刀冷冻治疗。术后定期复查肿瘤标志物及CT或MRI随访。结果小肝癌（≤5cm）患者135例,85%达到完全消融。大肝癌（〉5cm）患者45例,治疗后AFP降至正常范围或CT、MRI提示肿瘤完全坏死21例,占46.8%。转移性肝癌44例,治疗后肿瘤标志物降至正常或CT、MRI提示完全坏死30例,占68.2%。结论超声引导下肝癌的经皮穿刺氩氦刀冷冻消融术是一种安全、有效的治疗方法。     

脾脏切除后原发性肝癌2例

病例报告例１男，５０岁，因右上腹胀痛１ｗｋ于１９９７０６２７入院．１５ａ前曾患急性乙型肝炎，６ａ前因门静脉高压症行脾脏切除．查体：慢性肝病容，营养稍差，无黄疸，腹平坦，肝脾肋下未扪及，移浊（－）．实验室检查：ＨＢｓＡｇ（＋），肝功能ＣｈｉｌｄＡ级...     

70岁及以上不可切除的胰腺癌患者生存因素分析

Objective To explore the effect of related factors on survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer aged 70 years and over. Methods Fifty-seven patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer aged 70 years and over were enrolled.Their survival time were analyzed with SPSS 13.0 by taking account of gender, age, smoking history,alcohol history, pancreatic disease history, diabetes mellitus history, Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) scoring, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, CEA and CA199 levels. Results Gender,ECOG scoring, chemotherapy and radiotherapy had relationship with overall survival. The median survival time was 8.9 months and one-year survival rate was 28.1%. The median survival was (10.7±5.4) months in male group and (5.5±2.3) months in female group (P=0.000). The median survival was(10.1±5.8) months in patients with ECOG 0～1 group and(7.3±3.8)months in patients with ECOG 2 group (P=0.040). The median survival was(7.76±5.27) months in nochemotherapy group and(11.5±5.0)months in chemotherapy group (P=0.038). The median survival was(8.87±5.36)months in no radiotherapy group and (13.7±3.8) months in radiotherapy group (P=0.048). Conclusions The patients who have better ECOG performance status and receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy show better survival.     

70岁及以上不可切除的胰腺癌患者生存因素分析

Objective To explore the effect of related factors on survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer aged 70 years and over. Methods Fifty-seven patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer aged 70 years and over were enrolled.Their survival time were analyzed with SPSS 13.0 by taking account of gender, age, smoking history,alcohol history, pancreatic disease history, diabetes mellitus history, Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) scoring, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, CEA and CA199 levels. Results Gender,ECOG scoring, chemotherapy and radiotherapy had relationship with overall survival. The median survival time was 8.9 months and one-year survival rate was 28.1%. The median survival was (10.7±5.4) months in male group and (5.5±2.3) months in female group (P=0.000). The median survival was(10.1±5.8) months in patients with ECOG 0～1 group and(7.3±3.8)months in patients with ECOG 2 group (P=0.040). The median survival was(7.76±5.27) months in nochemotherapy group and(11.5±5.0)months in chemotherapy group (P=0.038). The median survival was(8.87±5.36)months in no radiotherapy group and (13.7±3.8) months in radiotherapy group (P=0.048). Conclusions The patients who have better ECOG performance status and receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy show better survival.     

746例肝脏和肝内胆管肿瘤临床发病特点分析

目的探讨肝脏和肝内胆管肿瘤的临床发病特点。方法收集2003年~2011年我科诊断的肝脏和肝内胆管肿瘤746例,分析其发病特点。结果肝脏肿瘤发病位于前九位的依次为肝细胞癌（43.4%）、血管瘤（37.3%）、肝内胆管细胞癌（5.8%）、转移性肿瘤（3.8%）、造血和淋巴样肿瘤（1.1%）、胆道乳头状瘤病（0.94%）、局灶性结节状增生（0.94%）、肝细胞不典型增生（0.67%）和不典型增生结节（0.54%）;本组未发现孤立性纤维肿瘤、淋巴管瘤病、假脂肪瘤、胚胎性肉瘤、Kaposi肉瘤、上皮样血管内皮细胞瘤、血管肉瘤、癌肉瘤、横纹肌肉瘤、畸胎瘤、卵黄囊瘤和横纹肌样瘤;肝细胞癌的发病年龄高峰在40~69岁,男性比女性高发,肝内胆管细胞癌高发年龄为50~69岁,男性与女性发病人数相当;血管瘤发病年龄高峰为30~49岁,女性比男性高发;转移性肿瘤发病高峰为40~59岁,男性与女性发病人数相当。结论肝脏肿瘤发病有逐年递增的趋势,来源于上皮的肝细胞癌是肝脏最常见的恶性肿瘤,来源于间叶的血管瘤是最常见的良性肿瘤。     

人工肝治疗对重型肝病患者生存期的影响

目的通过前瞻性、多中心、大样本的对照研究,探讨人工肝治疗对重型肝病患者生存期的影响。方法前瞻性地选择首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院等5家医院的重型肝炎和慢性肝炎重度(且凝血酶原活动度<50％)患者518例,将患者分为人工肝治疗组和常规内科治疗对照组,记录其诊断、分期等原始资料并进行随访,采用Kaplain-Maier方法进行生存情况分析。结果急性重型肝炎患者人工肝治疗组的中位生存期为(8．0±0．4)d,内科治疗对照组为(4．0±0．2)d,P=0．004。人工肝治疗2次以上疗效更加明显,它可使慢眭重型肝炎患者生存期由(27．0±1．6)d延长至(39．0±4．0)d,重型肝炎中期患者生存期由(38．0±17．5)d延长至(66．0±18．6)d;晚期患者生存期由(18．0±4．0)d延长至(26．0±2．5)d,差异均有统计学意义。结论人工肝治疗能够延长急性重型肝炎患者、慢性及亚急性重型肝炎中晚期患者的生存时间,多次治疗效果显著优于单次治疗和内科治疗。     

影响小肝癌预后的临床病理因素

目的：探讨小肝癌切除术后影响预后的有关因素。方法：分析42例手术切除小肝癌的临床病理学特征。32例随访1～18年（中位数9年）结果示：1、3、5、10年生存率：3．1～5cm（18例）为88．9％、44．4％、22．2％及5．6％，2．1～3cm（9例）为100％、66．7％、33．3％及22．2％；≤2cm（5例）为80．0％、40．0％、40．0％及20．0％；总体生存率为90．0％、56．3％、28．1％及12．5％。1、3、5年复发率为：3．1～5cm为22．2％、61．1％及66．7％；2．1～3cm为0％、22.2％及22．2％；≤2cm为20．0％、40．0％及40.0％；总体复发率分别为15．6％、46．9％及50．0％。2．1～3cm组的5年复发率明显低于3．1～5cm组（P均＜0．05）。结论外肝癌术后患者应视为高危人群，并随访至10年。     

活体肝移植治疗原发性肝癌的价值与风险评价

目的评价活体肝移植治疗原发性肝癌的价值与风险。方法自2002年1月至2006年12月，四川大学华西医院肝脏移植中心对27例原发性肝癌患者实施活体肝移植治疗，其中25例接受右半肝移植物，2例接受双供体移植物；对这27例受体及其29例供体的临床资料和随访结果进行回顾性分析。结果本组供体无死亡发生，并发症发生率为17．24％（5例），其中2例（6．90％）发生较严重的并发症，包括腹腔内出血及门静脉栓塞各l例；3例（10．34％）并发症较轻，伤口脂肪液化并感染、胸腔积液及乳糜漏各l例；所有供体目前都已完全康复，并回到以前的工作岗位。本组受体无一例发生小肝综合征，全组病例1年及3年累积生存率分别为84．01％及71．40％，与同期因各种其他非恶性疾病进行的成人活体肝移植受体1年及3年累积生存率（83．30％及75．51％）比较，两者差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论虽然活体肝移植治疗原发性肝癌对供体的风险及受体的益处尚需进一步的研究评价，但研究结果已初步表明，只要我们努力作好每一个细节，活体肝移植对供体来说是一相对安全的手术；而对肝癌患者来说则能相对满意地延长生存期，值得进一步推广运用。     

肝癌切除后定期直接肝动脉门静脉造影新方法的临床意义

目的探讨肝癌切除后定期直接肝动脉门静脉造影新方法的临床意义．方法肝癌切除患者２０例，术中插管至肝固有动脉及门静脉主干，并将ＩＤＤＳ埋植于腹壁皮下，术后定期直接经ＩＤＤＳ推注７６％泛影葡胺并拍摄点片，观察肝动脉门静脉显影情况．结果全组患者均能满意显示肝动脉、门静脉及其分支；造影发现ＣＴ漏诊的肝内复发病灶１例，发现肝动脉炎３例及肝动脉肝管瘘１例，发现门静脉主干癌栓１例．结论经ＩＤＤＳ定期直接肝动脉门静脉造影，有助于复发癌的监测及指导术后治疗     

消化道肿瘤肝转移介入治疗的临床应用及预后分析

目的探讨介入治疗消化道肿瘤肝转移的治疗疗效。方法回顾性分析96例胃癌、结肠癌和胰腺癌肝转移患者的介入治疗,随访7个月～5年,评价其治疗效果和生存率。结果29例胃癌肝转移患者平均生存期为22.7个月,1年、3年、5年生存率分别为93.1%、31.4%、13.8%;55例结肠癌肝转移患者平均生存期为19.4个月,1年、3年、5年生存率分别为85.5%、34.5%、10.9%;12例胰腺癌肝转移患者平均生存期为13.2个月,1年、3年生存率分别为57.1%、14.2%;本组患者总的平均生存期为17.8个月,1年、3年、5年生存率分别为85.4%、33.3%、10.4%。结论介入治疗是不能根治性切除的肝转移瘤患者的有效治疗方法,鳞癌、胰腺癌肝转移的患者预后较差,而富血供肿瘤、原发肿瘤已切除的患者预后较好、生存期较长。     

Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in Patients with Expanded Indications: A Single-Center Experience with 501 Patients

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate survival after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients with expanded indications. METHODS: A total of 501 patients had 545 liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. There were no predefined criteria for resectability with regard to the number or size of the tumors, locoregional invasion, or extrahepatic disease, except that resection had potential to be complete and macroscopically curative. All patients who had curative hepatic resection were advised to start postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients had expanded indications (52 percent), including 14 with liver metastases >10 cm, 194 with bilateral deposits, 140 with four or more liver metastases, and 73 with extrahepatic disease. The overall actuarial survival rates at one, three, five, and ten years were 88, 67, 45, and 36 percent, respectively, for patients with classic indications and 84, 53, 34, and 24 percent, respectively, for patients with expanded indications (P = 0.0009). In the group of expanded indications, there were more patients who received preoperative than postoperative chemotherapy: 72 (28 percent) vs. 18 (7 percent; P < 0.0001), and 148 (70 percent) vs. 131 (61 percent; P = 0.0466). In a multivariate analysis, four or more liver metastases and extrahepatic disease were independent predictors of poor outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that liver resection should be indicated in patients with expanded indications. The extent of the benefits of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy needs to be quantitated.     

Clinicopathological analysis of patients with gastric cancer in 1200 cases

INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer is one of the most common fatal malignancies in the world. The prognosis is generally poor in advanced gastric cancer .The low survival is related to delayed diagnosis, metastasis and recurrence after operation .The aim of this paper was to find correlation between clinical factors was to find correlation between clinical factors and biologic behavior of gastric cancer in a series of 1200 patients undergoing surgical resection.     

Serum endocan as a survival predictor for patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND:

The relationship between endocan expression and outcome in patients with chronic liver disease is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE:

To examine whether serum endocan level is predictive of outcome in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS:

A total of 68 patients with liver cirrhosis were enrolled. Outcome predictors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS:

During the median follow-up period (7.1 years), nine patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 10 patients died. Of the deceased patients, nine died due to hepatic decompensation or associated conditions. No significant factors were found to be predictive of the occurrence of HCC. In contrast, an elevated serum endocan level (≥2.0 ng/mL; HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.05 to 7.03]; P=0.037) and high Child-Pugh grade B/C (HR 2.65 [95% CI 1.30 to 6.89; P=0.006) were predictive of poor survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the respective cumulative survival rates at five and 10 years were 97.1% and 87.4% in patients with serum endocan levels <2.0 ng/mL and 85.8% and 64.4% in patients with levels ≥2.0 ng/mL (P=0.009), respectively. Moreover, the cumulative survival rates were significantly different among the patient groups divided according to serum endocan level and Child-Pugh grade (P=0.002).

CONCLUSION:

These findings suggest that serum endocan level may be a survival predictor for patients with liver cirrhosis.