首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
<正>2010年9月~2013年5月,我院收治13例Lisfranc损伤患者,给予切开复位、Herbert钉结合克氏针内定,效果满意,报道如下。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组13例,男8例,女5例,年龄21~52岁。左侧7例,右侧6例。按Myerson分型:A型2例,B型4例,C型7例。按Myerson三柱分类:中柱损伤3例,中柱合并内侧柱损伤4例,三柱损伤6例。1.2手术方法硬膜外麻醉。足背第1、2跖骨基底作纵行切口,显露第1、2  相似文献   

2.
《Injury》2018,49(12):2318-2321
BackgroundControversy exists regarding optimal primary management of Lisfranc injuries. Whether open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis is superior remains unknown.MethodsA national insurance database of approximately 23.5 million orthopedic patients was retrospectively queried for subjects who were diagnosed with a Lisfranc injury from 2007 to 2016 based on international classification of diseases (ICD) codes (PearlDiver, Colorado Springs, CO). Patients with lisfranc injuries then progressed to either nonoperative treatment, ORIF, or primary arthrodesis. Associated treatment costs were determined along with complication rate and hardware removal rate.Results2205 subjects with a diagnosis of Lisfranc injury were identified in the database. 1248 patients underwent nonoperative management, 670 underwent ORIF, and 212 underwent primary arthrodesis. The average cost of care associated with primary arthrodesis was greater ($5005.82) than for ORIF ($3961.97,P = 0.045). The overall complication rate was 23.1% (155/670) for ORIF and 30.2% (64/212) for primary arthrodesis (P = 0.04). Rates of hardware removal were 43.6% (292/670) for ORIF and 18.4% (39/212) for arthrodesis (P < 0.001). Furthermore, 2.5% (17/670) patients in the ORIF group progressed to arthrodesis at a mean of 308 days, average cost of care associated with this group of patients was $9505.12.DiscussionPrimary arthrodesis is both significantly more expensive and has a higher complication rate than ORIF. Open reduction and internal fixation demonstrated a low rate of progression to arthrodesis, although there was a high rate of hardware removal, which may represent a planned second procedure in the management of a substantial number of patients treated with ORIF.Level of evidence:Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.  相似文献   

3.
4.
5.
6.
Summary Lumberjack fractures normally occur in the thoracic and upper lumbar spine as a result of hyperextension and shear. This case, however, involves a lumberjack who suffered a lumbosacral fracture dislocation without neurological deficits, which occurred as the result of shear and hyperflexion. Due to the high degree of instability of this lesion, the treatment consisted of dorsoventral fusion with instrumentation.  相似文献   

7.
Surgical Principles Arthrodesis of the damaged tarsometatarsal joint following reduction and/or correction of malposition.  相似文献   

8.
目的:总结Lisfranc损伤切开复位内固定的临床经验,评价手术治疗效果。方法:自2010年3月~2012年5月,35例Lisfranc骨折脱位的患者接受切开复位内固定术,平均年龄33.5岁,损伤按Quenu—Kuss分型,A型(同向移位)15例,B型(部分移位)13例,C型(分裂移位)7例。采用1-2个足背纵行直切口。内固定材料包括克氏针和螺钉及接骨板。结果:35例损伤患者得到0.5—2年(平均1.2年)的随访。感染2例,2例发生创伤后关节炎,无1例克氏针松动。依据美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)足评分标准对患足术后的功能进行评定。好22例,较好10例,差3例。结论:切开复位治疗Lisfranc骨折脱位可取得良好效果。  相似文献   

9.
《The Foot》2014,24(3):135-139
Lisfranc injuries represent a wide spectrum of different injuries at the tarsometatarsal joint. Not all types fit the currently available classifications. This case illustrates a rare subtype of a Lisfranc injury, with a dislocation of the entire first ray. It is presented to create more awareness for midfoot injuries. This article reviews the literature and provides recommendations for the treatment of similar cases in the future.  相似文献   

10.
陈旧性跖跗关节骨折脱位   总被引:18,自引:12,他引:6  
目的分析跖跗关节(Lisfranc)骨折脱位急诊处理的不当所导致的后期功能障碍的原因,并结合现今在这一领域的研究状况进行讨论。方法从2000年3月~2005年2月共收治陈旧性Lis-franc骨折脱位34例,24例行切开复位内固定,10例患者行关节融合术。结果按美国骨科足踝外科协会(AOFAS)中足部分的评分标准,50~60分2例,60~70分4例,70~80分5例,80~90分18例,90~100分5例。结论Lisfranc损伤晚期并发症的出现与复位不彻底、固定不牢靠以及固定时间不充分有关。临床医生在遇到中足扭伤的患者时,要提高警惕,以免漏诊。对大多数患者而言,以伤后6周内进行切开复位内固定为好。  相似文献   

11.
《Foot and Ankle Surgery》2020,26(5):535-540
BackgroundIn Lisfranc injuries the stability of the tarsometatarsal joints guides the treatment of the injury. Determining the stability, especially in the subtle Lisfranc injuries, can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to identify incidence, mechanisms of injury and predictors for instability in Lisfranc injuries.MethodsEighty-four Lisfranc injuries presenting at Oslo University Hospital between September 2014 and August 2015 were included. The diagnosis was based on radiologically verified injuries to the tarsometatarsal joints. Associations between radiographic findings and stability were examined.ResultsThe incidence of Lisfranc injuries was 14/100,000 person-years, and only 31% were high-energy injuries. The incidence of unstable injuries was 6/100,000 person–years, and these were more common in women than men (P = 0.016). Intraarticular fractures in the two lateral tarsometatarsal joints increased the risk of instability (P = 0.007). The height of the second tarsometatarsal joint was less in the unstable injuries than in the stable injuries (P = 0.036).ConclusionThe incidence of Lisfranc injuries in the present study is higher than previously published. The most common mechanism of injury is low-energy trauma. Intraarticular fractures in the two lateral tarsometatarsal joints, female gender and shorter second tarsometatarsal joint height increase the risk of an unstable injury.Level of EvidenceLevel III, cross-sectional study.  相似文献   

12.
目的研究分析微型钢板结合空心钉辅助克氏针一期内固定治疗24例MyersonC型lisfranc骨折脱位患者的中短期疗效。方法2006年6月至2011年9月,采用微型钢板结合空心钉辅助克氏针一期内固定治疗24例MyersonC型Lisfranc骨折脱位患者(20-50岁,平均29.24±5.32岁),其中(C1型16例,C2型8例。根据美国足踝骨科协会(AOFAS)踝后足评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价治疗效果。结果术后24例均获10-49个月(平均11.32±7.32个月)随访。手术时间平均80.3±11.2min。X线片检查显示24足均获解剖复位,足弓形态恢复正常。所有骨折皆一期愈合,无再次骨折脱位情况发生。术后2例出现浅表感染,2例出现皮缘坏死,2例出现足拇趾外翻畸形,5例出现负重及行走痛(2例较轻,3例口服消炎止痛药物可明显缓解,均不影响生活)。末次随访时AOFAS评分为68-98分,平均81.35±3.24分;C1、C2型评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.751)。VAS评分为0~6分,平均3.6±0.5分。结果优13例,良8例,一般2例,差1例,优良率为87.5%。结论采用微型钢板结合空心钉辅助克氏针内固定治疗C型Lisfranc骨折脱位,可达到一期解剖复位固定效果。尽管仍存在一些并发症,但对症处理效果满意,整体疗效良好。  相似文献   

13.
Lisfranc injuries may occur in the form of fracture-dislocations or pure ligamentous dislocations or subluxations. These innocuous appearing injuries have the potential for significant morbidity and long-term sequelae resulting in permanent deformities. Ligamentous subluxations account for 20% of these injuries and cases with partial incongruity are amenable to percutaneous fixation. In this article, we present step-by-step percutaneous fixation of these injuries as well as the post-operative management.  相似文献   

14.
目的探讨切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc骨折脱位的临床经验。方法自2001年3月至2009年3月,我科对37例Lisfranc骨折脱位患者切开复位皮质骨螺钉配合克氏针内固定治疗。其中男25例,女12例,年龄17~61岁;新鲜损伤33例,陈旧损伤4例。结果37例获得随访,随访时间24-49个月,平均28个月。采用美国矫形足踝协会的评分标准进行评价,好24例,较好11例,差2例。结论对于Lisfranc骨折脱位应手术治疗,解剖复位和坚强内固定是获得良好疗效的必要条件,陈旧性损伤应行关节融合术。  相似文献   

15.
Study design  A unique case of lumbosacral lateral dislocation without fracture is reported. Objective  To report on the diagnosis and treatment of a traumatic L5-S1 lateral dislocation in a polytrauma 34-year-old male with L5 nerve root paralysis. Method  Interbody fusion following decompression, posterior reduction and interbody grafting combined with posterior plating was performed. Results  At an early stage the patient was able to return to work and walk without supports. At the 12-month follow-up evaluation no back pain was referred and fusion was achieved. Conclusions  Lateral pure dislocation of the lumbosacral joint is very rare and can be easily misdiagnosed. A careful evaluation of the AP standard X-ray can lead to diagnosis and can be confirmed by CT scan. Prompt reduction and fusion is the treatment of choice to allow a quick functional recovery.  相似文献   

16.
17.
《Foot and Ankle Surgery》2022,28(2):245-250
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome after nondisplaced and stable Lisfranc injuries.Methods26 patients with injuries to the Lisfranc joint complex detected on CT scans, but without displacement were tested to be stable using a fluoroscopic stress test. The patients were immobilized in a non-weightbearing short leg cast for 6 weeks. The final follow-up was 55 (IQR 53–60) months after injury.ResultsAll the Lisfranc injuries were confirmed to be stable on follow-up weightbearing radiographs at a minimum of 3 months after injury. Median American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score at 1-year follow-up was 89 (IQR 84–97) and at final follow-up 100 (IQR 90–100); The AOFAS score continued to improve after 1-year (P=.005). The median visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was 0 (IQR 0–0) at the final follow-up. One patient had radiological signs of osteoarthritis at 1-year follow-up.ConclusionStable Lisfranc injuries treated nonoperatively had an excellent outcome in this study with a median follow-up of 55 months. The AOFAS score continued to improve after 1 year.  相似文献   

18.
Tarsal cuneiform dislocation in association with Lisfranc fracture-dislocation is a rare pedal injury. In this report, we describe the case of a patient who sustained a dorsal dislocation of the intermediate cuneiform in association with tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocation following traumatic axial loading and torsion of his foot. A satisfactory outcome was achieved by treating the injury by means of closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. ACFAS Level of Clinical Evidence: 4.  相似文献   

19.
患者,女,62岁,因下楼梯时摔倒后出现左下肢肿痛、活动受限6d入院.伤后曾到当地附近医院就诊,行膝关节CT示左股骨外侧髁骨折合并髌骨脱位(图1a,1b,1c,1d),后于另一医院就诊,予以髌骨脱位手法复位,患肢石膏固定后进一步踝关节X线检查发现左内、外踝骨折(图1e).为进一步治疗来我院就诊.患者既往体健.查体:双下肢...  相似文献   

20.
This article provides an update and overview of Lisfranc injury and Jones fracture in the athletic population. Sports-related Lisfranc sprains or fractures are subtle injuries that can be easily missed. Now, there is greater understanding of midfoot sprains that represent a spectrum of injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most types of fifth metatarsal fractures have a favorable prognosis and can be treated conservatively. The treatment options for Jones fractures in athletes have been much debated. This article discusses issues related to anatomy, mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, imaging, and diagnosis, which are necessary to appropriately treat these injuries.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号