Viability of hospital-based radiography programs

OBJECTIVE: To identify and address risks threatening hospital-based radiography programs and to report conditions that contribute to their survival. METHOD: Program directors of the 201 hospital-sponsored radiography programs accredited by the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology were surveyed via questionnaire. Program demographic data are reported for comparison. RESULTS: More than 90% of the survey respondents believe their programs will remain viable over the next 5 years, indicating a possible plateau in program closures. A majority of the program directors cite financial concerns as a risk factor. The study results suggest a need for additional inquiry covering inter-related groups.     

Digital radiography in dentistry: a survey of Indiana dentists

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the number of Indiana dental practices that utilize digital radiography and to identify the reasons for using or not using digital radiography. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 300 licensed dentists in the State of Indiana. Demographic, clinical and digital technology responses were obtained. The data were analysed using SPSS 12.0 (Statistical Package Social Sciences) software; t-tests and Pearson's chi(2) test were performed on several variables with significance levels set at P< 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two dental practices (51%) responded to the survey. Thirty dental practices (19.7%) used digital radiography in their office. Twenty-two (73%) of the dentists using digital radiography were general practitioners. The number of dentists in a practice was a significant factor in predicting the use of digital radiography (t=2.57, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that digital radiography is more commonly used by general dentists in group practices.     

The radiography essentials: an evolutionary perspective.

A review of all the Radiography Essentials since their inception in 1944 provides an insightful look into the history and dynamics of entry-level educational standards in radiography. As successive Essentials have been revised, more attention has been given to the clinical environment, a broadened and strengthened curricula and due process. Additionally, radiographers have gained greater autonomy in delivering professional entry-level education in radiography.     

Educational programs in radiologic technology

This article reports on a survey of educational programs in radiography, nuclear medicine, radiation therapy and sonography. The purpose of the survey was to help educators validate their individual program requirements by providing a profile of educational programs in each discipline. Survey results demonstrate similarities in program length, academic system, faculty teaching load and enrollment size. Major differences were found in clinical hour requirements and credit hour conversion.     

Statistical evaluation of admission criteria for a radiography program

The admission process of a radiography program was analyzed. The criteria used were summarized in a weighted score. A measurable difference was found between applicants offered appointment and those not, and the weighted score was found to be a statistically significant predictor of subsequent student performance.     

Testing a policy for skull radiography (and admission) following mild head injury

There has been, and continues to be, conflicting advice regarding skull radiography following an apparently uncomplicated head injury. Policies on admission are often ill defined. In 1983, representatives of the Royal College of Radiologists met neurosurgeons at a seminar in Harrogate organized by the DHSS and laid down clear, but little publicized, joint recommendations: "The Harrogate Criteria". The survey described here evaluated an existing liberal policy for skull radiography (and a loose policy for admissions) against these recommendations, and it was concluded that the number of patients having skull radiography (74% of head injury attenders) was excessive. Measured against the "Harrogate Criteria", requests for 36% of the adult and 47% of children's skull radiographs did not fulfil these criteria. As a corollary, it was also concluded that loose admissions policies could usefully be altered to comply more closely with the Harrogate recommendations. This would not necessarily reduce the numbers admitted, but would provide casualty officers with a framework on which to base this crucial aspect of clinical decision making, where presently there is often very little structure at all. The authors suggest that all the options have not been fully explored, and that a simple but important alteration to the Harrogate guidelines would provide an even closer link between policy on skull radiography and patient admission. Specifically, most patients who are to be admitted do not need skull radiographs.     

Digital radiography in general dental practice: a field study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to conduct a field study to survey the performance of digital radiography and how it was used by dentists in general dental practice. METHODS: 19 general dental practitioners were visited at their clinics. Ambient light (illuminance) was measured in the rooms where the monitors were placed. Different technical display parameters were noted. Test images and two phantoms--one low-contrast phantom and one line-pair resolution phantom--were used to evaluate the digital system. How the dentists used the enhancement program was investigated by noting which functions were used. RESULTS: Average illuminance in the operating room was 668 lux (range 190-1250 lux). On radiographs of the low-contrast phantom taken at the clinic, the ability to observe the holes decreased as illuminance increased. On average, the "light percentage" initially set on the monitor had to be decreased by 17% and contrast by 10% to optimize the display of the test images. The general dental practitioners used the enhancement programs most often to alter brightness and contrast to obtain the subjectively best image. Large differences between the clinics were noted. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of how to handle digital equipment in general dental practice should be improved. A calibrated monitor of good quality should be a given priority, as should proper ambient light conditions. There is a need to develop standardized quality controls for digital dental radiography.     

Frequency of procedures performed by entry-level radiographers

CONTEXT: The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) examination in radiography is designed to assess the knowledge and cognitive skills typically required of an entry-level staff technologist. The ARRT uses the task inventory questionnaire, a common method of practice analysis, to update certification examination content and clinical competency requirements. OBJECTIVE: To determine which procedures entry-level radiographers are responsible for performing and how often they perform those procedures. METHODS: A practice analysis questionnaire consisting, in part, of 273 specific radiographic procedures was sent to 2400 registered radiologic technologists. Respondents were asked to indicate if they were responsible for each procedure and, if so, the frequency with which they performed the procedure. The questionnaires from 445 entry-level (0 to 3 years of experience) respondents were analyzed to identify frequently performed procedures. RESULTS: Posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs were the most frequently performed procedures, conducted on average 4.7 to 4.8 times per week; gallbladder examinations, along with some tomograms, were the least often or never performed procedures. Summary Results of these findings were used to modify the ARRT examination in radiography to better reflect the workplace. Based on the data, a list of 140 specific radiographic procedures is now included in the ARRT 2005 Content Specifications for the Examination in Radiography.     

Heat injury prevention practices in high school football.

OBJECTIVE: To survey high school American football programs regarding current prevention measures for reducing heat injuries during the football season. DESIGN: Web-based survey of 27 questions based on consensus statement guidelines by the American College of Sports Medicine on reducing heat injury risk in youth football. SETTING: National (United States) and community-based. PARTICIPANTS: High school programs receiving survey distribution from their state athletic association and the National Federation of State High School Associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses (percentage and incidence) to questions on preseason acclimatization procedures, practice modification protocols, preparticipation risk factors, hydration management strategies, rest period strategies, heat injury education and policies, and preparation for heat-related emergency care. RESULTS: A total of 540 high school football programs from 26 states completed the survey. The reported number of preseason heat injuries per program (1.38+/-2.08) was greater (P<0.001) compared to during the regular season (0.98+/-1.84). Programs modified equipment configurations during preseason (no helmets or pads, 31.3%; just helmets, 57.0%; helmets and shoulder pads only, 33.5%) or altered the practice schedule when there was excessive heat. Hydration management, education, and preparation for dealing with an acute heat injury varied among programs. CONCLUSIONS: Greater implementation of effective prevention measures to reduce the incidence of heat-related injury and death in high school American football is needed. Strategies should focus on modifying practices appropriately on a day-to-day basis to minimize heat strain and optimize hydration, identifying and educating at-risk individuals during the preparticipation period, and developing an emergency action plan for effectively managing heat injuries.     

The use of chemical restraint in helicopter transport

Introduction: Helicopter transport of the combative patient is a major safety hazard facing air medical teams. Although physical restraints alone are helpful, the addition of chemical restraint (CR) often is necessary to control these patients while in flight.

Methods: A survey was conducted to determine the current practices of using nonparalyzing CR in air medical transport programs nationwide. The survey consisted of 24 questions on the use of CR during transport. Each U.S. program belonging to the Association of Air Medical Services was contacted by telephone, and a flight nurse or paramedic provided answers based on personal experience and statistics compiled by his or her individual program.

Results: Of the 100 programs responding, benzodiazepines were used most commonly to control agitation with 51% using midazolam. Patients with a head injury required CR more frequently than any other condition (73%). Crews flying larger aircraft reported less need for CR. A physician order was required by only 30% of the programs, but delays infrequently endangered the patient (2%). Only 7% of the responding programs had a patient whose condition deteriorated because of CR.

Conclusion: CR is necessary in air medical transport. Most programs use short-acting benzodiazepines. Crews in smaller aircraft use CR more frequently, and head injury is the most common condition requiring such restraint.     

Multidisciplinary Approach in Teaching Diagnostic Radiology to Medical Students: The Development,Implementation, and Evaluation of a Virtual Educational Model

PurposeThe aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an online multidisciplinary approach for teaching diagnostic radiology to medical students.MethodsAn online 10-session case-based learning course was designed and taught by a multidisciplinary team of radiologists, surgeons, and internists. Session topics included common clinical case scenarios for different systems and were hosted on a videoconferencing platform. Students from six medical schools across Texas enrolled in the course. The effectiveness of each session was evaluated using a pretest-posttest design. Students completed a final survey after the course to evaluate their experience.ResultsAn average of 108 attended the live sessions, with attendance peaking at 220. On average, 75 students completed both the pretest and posttest of each session. Posttest scores were an average of 46% higher than pretest scores. A total of 109 students completed the final survey; more than 90% of participants agreed that the program was relevant, that its multidisciplinary approach was valuable, and that it increased their knowledge of imaging as a diagnostic tool. Seventy-four percent said that the program increased their interest in radiology. Almost all participants said that the topics presented were thought to be “excellent and clinically important to learn” by most of the students (70%). Participants reported increased confidence in basic radiology skills after completion of the program.ConclusionsAn online multidisciplinary approach can be feasibly implemented to address the radiology education needs of a large number of medical students across a group of medical schools.     

Advertise Right by Addressing the Concerns: An Evaluation of Women's/Breast Imaging Radiology Fellowship Website Content for Prospective Fellows

PurposeFellowship is an important part of postgraduate medical training as it facilitates advanced training in a subspecialty of interest. Internet is the most readily available and frequently used tool for acquiring information about the fellowship programs by residents worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze the content of the websites of American and Canadian breast/women's imaging fellowship programs.MethodsThe content of active Canadian and American breast/women's imaging fellowship websites was collected and analyzed in August 2019 using 27 different criteria in the categories of application process, recruitment, education, research, clinical work, and incentives. The fellowship program without a webpage were excluded from the study.ResultsOut of 76 active breast/women's imaging Radiology fellowship programs in the US and Canada, 75 had dedicated fellowship websites available for analysis. One program was excluded due to lack of a dedicated website. On average, websites showcased 11 of the 27 criteria (40.0%). The category with the least prevalent information was incentives especially career placement after completion of the fellowship (1/75, 1.3%). Majority of the programs around 80.0% (60/75) had adequate information about the application process and requirements.The mean number of schools satisfying the different groups of criteria differed (P< 0.01); more schools satisfied the application criteria (60.5/75; 79.6% ± 20.3%) than the incentives (12.8/75; 16.8% ± 8.2%) and recruitment (24.5/75; 32.2% ± 29.7%) criteria.ConclusionMajority of the breast and women's imaging fellowship websites lack important information. Providing comprehensive online information about the program and application process may help the applicants to choose the best suited program for their academic needs and career progression.     

Fellowship Candidate Factors Considered by Program Directors

ObjectiveThe neuroradiology fellowship match has been in existence for about 20 years. However, the elements by which neuroradiology fellowship program directors evaluate candidates have not been clearly elucidated. We sought to identify the factors that program directors use to rank neuroradiology fellowship applicants.MethodsAn anonymous Qualtrics online five-question survey about educational credentials, personal traits, extracurricular activities, and demographic characteristics was sent to 72 neuroradiology program directors in April 2019. Each question required ranking of 10 factors based on different characteristics of fellowship candidates. Items included gender, nationality, US Medical Licensing Examination scores, internal applicants, work and research experience, recommendation letters, residency program, medical school attended, and visa status. Program directors had the ability to list any new characteristics that were not included in the survey.ResultsIn all, 68 of 72 (94.4%) neuroradiology programs responded to the survey. The most important criteria by which candidates were assessed were (1) residency program attended for educational credential, (2) personality as assessed by faculty at interviews for candidate personal traits, (3) research performed for candidate’s extracurricular activities, and (4) likelihood of coming to or previous experience in the fellowship geographic area. Neuroradiology program directors independently stressed residency program attended, personality assessed during the interview by faculty, internal candidate status, letters of recommendation, and research activities as their top five criteria in ranking the candidates.ConclusionMultiple factors are weighed by neuroradiology fellowship program directors in selecting fellows, but recent experiences in residency, research, and faculty interactions are prioritized. Internal candidates have an advantage for remaining as fellows within their residency programs.     

From R.T. to entry-level manager: how to climb the clinical ladder.

Modern healthcare institutions are faced with an environment that is rapidly changing. Many imposed changes have repercussions that affect lower-level radiology managers. According to one expert, radiology administrators face two dilemmas in preparing for the future: upgrading skills of those currently employed and ensuring that future employees are prepared to succeed. This paper examines the knowledge, skills and abilities needed for entry-level managers in radiology to succeed in healthcare. In order to gain current information on processes used in promoting staff technologists to management positions, the authors developed and mailed a questionnaire to 35 radiology administrators across the country. In addition to promoting employees, organizations should take a role in the maintenance and growth of an employee's career by creating realistic career paths for advancement, including programs in mentoring, assessment centers or formal training in the art of interviewing candidates. In order for entry-level radiology managers to succeed in a complex healthcare environment, mere technical expertise is not sufficient. The responsibility for identifying and providing appropriate education and training lies with employers, educational programs, professional groups and the employee.     

Presumption of death by air medical transport teams

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate nationwide trends and factors influencing the determination of death practice by rotor-wing air medical transport programs. METHODS: A survey was mailed to all Association of Air Medical Service members concerning demographics, crew configuration, team leader, patient population, field death determination protocols, and other possible associated factors. All rotor-wing air medical transport programs that carry out scene transports were included. RESULTS: The most common field presumption criteria were no response to advanced cardiac life support (77%), no signs of life on scene (65%), and asystole in 2 EKG monitor leads (61%). The most frequent reasons cited not to presume a patient dead in the field were political issues (71%) and signs of life on scene (56%). Criteria other than medical condition that were considered in the decision to presume death were ground personnel input (55%) and program policy/medical control (39%). The following factors did not significantly affect the presumption rate: crew configuration, team leader, transport time, billing, and type of medical control. CONCLUSION: Medical criteria appear to determine presumption of death in the field. Nonmedical factors, such as billing, response, and transport times, do not affect this process.     

Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the radiation-related risk associated with twelve imaging programs available on the Orthophos (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) dental panoramic radiography unit. METHODS: Organ absorbed doses for each program were measured using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosemeters. Effective dose (E) was calculated in two ways; first, using the method recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, which excludes the salivary glands (designated Eexc), and second, with its inclusion (designated Einc). Organ and effective doses were both used to compare the various imaging programs. RESULTS: In 11 of the 12 programs studied the salivary glands received the highest individual organ dose, and Einc was found to be up to double Eexc. When the image was restricted to the dentition (program 2) organ doses were lower than for the complete jaws (program 1) by up to 85%, and Eexc and Einc reduced by about one half. When programs 2 and 6 (to image the temporomandibular joints) are used in place of program 1, the former combination provides more image information at an equivalent risk. CONCLUSIONS: The value of E in panoramic radiography depends on the inclusion of the salivary glands in the calculation and the magnitude of the dose.     

Global Radiology Training Prevalence Among Radiology Residency Programs

ObjectiveGlobal Radiology aims to enhance access to medical imaging services and education, worldwide. To date, few reports have evaluated Global Radiology Training (GRT) in radiology residency programs. Here, we examined how radiology residency programs perceive and incorporate GRT into their curriculum, and how this information is promoted online.MethodsTwo methods were used to examine the current state of GRT. First, radiology residency program directors (identified via the Association of Program Directors in Radiology) were surveyed on topics including: Electives, institutional partnerships, resident and faculty involvement, inquiry by prospective residents, and barriers to implementation. Second, radiology residency program websites (n = 193) were examined for existing GRT on the programs’ publicly available webpages.ResultsThere were 62 survey responses (response rate of 19%). Thirty-eight percent (24/62) of residency programs offered a Global Radiology elective to their residents within the past academic year and 27% (17/62) of programs have active affiliations with medical institutions outside of the United States. Eighty-four percent of program directors (52/62) received questions from residency applicants regarding opportunities to participate in Global Radiology. Furthermore, only 13% (26/193) of all radiology residency programs listed at least one GRT elective on their webpage.DiscussionGRT in radiology residency is more widely available than previously reported and has been underrepresented on residency program websites. In the present survey, the majority of radiology residency program directors reported that radiology is an important component of Global Health, one-third of whom have already incorporated the subject into their curriculum. However, most common barriers to GRT include, perceived lack of time in the curriculum and lack of faculty interest. The high prevalence of inquiry from residency program applicants about GRT suggests that it may be a notable factor for applicants during the ranking process. Programs build up GRT may choose to share related information seeking to may choose to emphasize work in Global Radiology on their program webpages.