Precoated femoral component in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: results at a mean 10-year follow-up

This is a mid-term report at 10 years' mean follow-up of a study of a precoated femoral component used in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA). Of an original cohort of 98 hips undergoing THA performed by one surgeon, 75 hips in 65 patients (mean age, 67 years) were prospectively followed up for 7 to 12 years (mean, 10 years). All hips had the same porous coated acetabular component and a precoated femoral component (with an oval cross-section) implanted using Simplex bone cement (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ). There was no femoral component loosening or revision. Two acetabular components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and protrusio acetabulae had radiographic loosening; however, only 1 was symptomatic and was revised. Acetabular osteolysis was seen in 4 hips (5.3%), and minor femoral osteolysis was seen in 3 hips (4%). Used in this manner in this patient population, precoating is not detrimental to successful fixation at 10 years' mean follow-up of primary hybrid THA.     

20-year experience with cemented primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty using so-called second-generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger

We present the 20-year experience of 47 hips in 40 patients aged 50 years or younger with cemented primary total hip arthroplasty using second-generation femoral cementing techniques. Average follow-up duration in the 23 patients living at least 17 years was 18.2 years. Overall, 18 hips (38%) had components revised or removed for any reason, at an average duration of 12.6 years. Every revision or reoperation involved removing the acetabular component. Of these 18 acetabular components, 15 (32%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Eleven additional acetabular components were loose by radiographic criteria at final follow-up, yielding prevalence of aseptic acetabular loosening (55%). Four femoral components (8%) were revised for osteolysis without loosening, and 3 (6%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Femoral osteolysis, with or without component loosening, led to revision in 5 ( 11%) hips compared with 6% for aseptic loosening alone. Osteolysis was the primary problem leading to acetabular and femoral component revision in this series of people < or = 50 years old over the first 20 years after the index operation.     

Outcome of total hip arthroplasty in small-proportioned patients

In a prospective, consecutive series, 41 total hip arthroplasties were performed in 27 small-proportioned patients with small femoral dimensions. The 17 female and 10 male patients averaged 23.6 years (range, 14-47 years), and the mean height and weight were 157 cm (range, 132-183 cm) and 53.5 kg (range, 36-84 kg). The most common preoperative diagnosis was juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in 18 patients (28 hips). Most patients were severely disabled in their daily activity, and 68% of the patients were classified as Charnley functional class C. The femoral implants consisted primarily of the proximally porous-coated miniature Anatomic Medullary Locking femoral component (AML/CDH, Depuy, Warsaw, IN) in 33 hips in 22 patients (average stem diameter, 9.5 mm; range, 8-12.0 mm). A porous ingrowth acetabular cup fixed with screws was used in all procedures. At an average follow-up of 51 months, Harris Hip Scores improved significantly from 34 points (range, 0-65 points) preoperatively to 85 points (range, 33-100 points) after arthroplasty. There were no intraoperative complications. There was 1 revision because of femoral implant loosening. Three cementless femoral components showed evidence of nonprogressive subsidence. One patient had significant bilateral acetabular component polyethylene wear and underwent revision. All other femoral and acetabular components were radiographically stable. The relief of pain and improvement of function were dramatic. The miniature AML/CDH femoral component, combined with an uncemented acetabular cup, provides a promising, off-the-shelf alternative in small-proportioned patients.     

Uncemented acetabular components with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: results at five to twelve years.

BACKGROUND: Anterolateral acetabular bone deficiency is one of the technical problems associated with total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of one method of acetabular reconstruction for hip dysplasia-placement of an uncemented socket in conjunction with a bulk femoral head autograft. METHODS: Forty-four hips in thirty-five patients (twenty-nine female and six male; average age, thirty-nine years) with developmental hip dysplasia were treated with primary total hip arthroplasty with use of an uncemented porous-coated titanium cup fixed with screws and an autogenous bulk femoral head graft. The patients were followed clinically in a prospective fashion for five to 12.3 years (mean, 7.5 years), and radiographs were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Four acetabular components were revised: two, because of severe polyethylene wear and osteolysis; one, because of aseptic loosening; and one, because of fracture of the acetabular shell. The mean Harris hip score for the unrevised hips improved from 51 points preoperatively to 91 points postoperatively. No unrevised socket had definite radiographic evidence of loosening. Forty-three of the forty-four hips had no radiographic evidence of resorption of the graft or had radiographic evidence of resorption limited to the nonstressed area of the graft lateral to the edge of the cup. CONCLUSIONS: This method of reconstruction provided reliable acetabular fixation and appeared to restore acetabular bone stock in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. We use this technique for patients with moderate anterolateral acetabular bone deficiency requiring total hip arthroplasty.     

Does Pelvic Osteolysis Occur With a Nonmodular Uncemented Acetabular Component?

We present a radiographic follow-up of an uncemented, nonmodular, pure titanium-backed acetabular component at 6 to 12 years postimplantation. Between 1990 and 1992, 130 primary total hip arthroplasties were carried out by 1 surgeon using this implant, in association with both cemented and uncemented femoral components. There were 19 deaths, 5 revisions, and 19 hips lost to follow-up, leaving 87 hips available for review at a mean of 9.6 years. Two revisions were for infection, whereas 3 well-fixed cups were changed at the time of revision of a loose femoral component to allow downsizing to a 28-mm head. No cup has been revised for aseptic loosening. There was no radiographic evidence of periacetabular osteolysis or loosening of any of the cups, even in a subgroup of 31 patients who were 60 years or younger at the time of implantation.     

Long-term follow-up of cemented total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis

Seventy-five primary cemented total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were performed in 53 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. All patients were followed for an average of 7.4 years, unless their prosthetic hips failed before that time. Clinical evaluation was based on a 10-point maximum rating scale, and ratings for pain, walking, function, and activity improved from preoperative values to the most recent follow-up examination. Revision THA was performed for aseptic acetabular loosening in four hips, and femoral loosening in one hip. Sepsis occurred in another four hips. Complications of wound healing occurred in 14 hips. Roentgenographic evidence of loosening was seen in six acetabular components, in three femoral components, and in the femoral and acetabular component of one hip; none of these hips have as yet required revision THA. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed a 93% survival probability at seven years, which fell to 77% at 12 years in these patients. A trend was that younger, larger patients had increased failure and component loosening rates. Cemented primary THA has been a satisfactory operation in the rheumatoid patient. The relatively high rate of wound healing problems and sepsis may be due to the systemic immune nature of rheumatoid arthritis; however, 25% of these prosthetic hips either failed or are at risk for future failure. Thus, improved techniques are still necessary to increase the long-term success of THA in the rheumatoid patient.     

High placement of noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report

We previously reported the average ten-year results associated with the use of porous-coated noncemented acetabular shells that were placed at a high hip center at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty in thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) with severe acetabular bone loss. We now report the average 16.8-year results for twenty-one patients (twenty-three hips). Of the original cohort of forty-four patients (forty-six hips), thirty-nine patients (forty-one hips; 89%) retained the shell. Two shells (4.3%) were revised because of aseptic loosening, and three (6.5%) were revised because of infection. Six femoral components were revised because of femoral osteolysis, and seven were revised because of aseptic loosening without osteolysis. On the basis of our results after an average duration of follow-up of 16.8 years, we believe that the placement of an uncemented acetabular component at a high hip center continues to be an excellent technique for revision total hip arthroplasty in selected patients with severe acetabular bone loss.     

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis diseases. A two- to six-year follow-up study.

Forty primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were performed in 34 patients with an average age of 41.2 years (range, 21-78 years). Four hips had one component placed with cement: three femoral, one acetabular. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (30 hips), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (seven hips), and systemic lupus erythematosus (three hips). The follow-up period averaged 3.7 years (range, two to six years). Thirty-five percent of the patients were using corticosteroids before hip replacement and throughout the follow-up period, whereas 44% of the patients had been using steroids in the past. Additionally, 79% of the patients were taking some form of antiinflammatory medications at follow-up examination. Clinical evaluation based on a ten-point rating scale indicated significant improvements from preoperative to the most recent follow-up examination for pain (from 3.1 to 9.0), walking (4.0-7.3), function (3.5-6.0), and activity (3.0-4.9). None of the hips required revision surgery, and none are pending. There was no evidence of roentgenographic failure; however, 43% of femoral and 12.8% of acetabular components showed some minor radiolucencies with sclerotic lines. None of these involved 100% of the bone-prosthesis interface. Femoral component subsidence occurred in two hips, and acetabular component migration occurred in one hip. Complications included three (8.1%) intraoperative femoral fractures, of which two required internal fixation. One patient had postoperative, culture negative, wound drainage. No deep sepsis occurred. These findings suggest that uncemented THA may be successful in the rheumatoid patient. Pain relief, walking, function, and activity levels are similar to those seen in cemented replacements with this length of follow-up period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of prospective and consecutive series.

We performed a prospective study in 108 consecutive patients (116 hips) who were followed for a minimum of 10 years (10-12 years) after primary total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented porous-coated anatomic (PCA) hip prosthesis. The average age of the patients at operation was 48.4 years (range, 19-85 years), and the diagnosis was avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 46 hips, neglected femoral neck fracture in 27, osteoarthrosis secondary to childhood pyogenic arthritis in 24, childhood tuberculous arthritis in 5, and miscellaneous in 14. The average preoperative Harris Hip Score was 55 points, which improved to 87 points at 11 years. Seventy-five hips (65%) were excellent, 11 (9%) were good, and 30 (39%) were poor. The overall rate of revision was 15% (17 of 116 hips). The rate of revision of the femoral component was 11% (13 of 116 hips), and the rate of revision of the acetabular component was 15% (17 of 116 hips). The prevalence of thigh pain was 28% at 11 years. The increase in the incidence of aseptic loosening of the femoral component was found to explain the high incidence of severe thigh pain at 11 years' follow-up. At 11 years, there was femoral osteolysis in 69 hips (59%) and acetabular osteolysis in 65 hips (56%). At 6 years, 20 hips (17%) showed definite wear of the polyethylene liner. At 11 years, 81 hips (70%) showed definite wear of the polyethylene liner. Because the complication rate of the PCA hip prosthesis with respect to loosening, osteolysis, and excessive wear in the polyethylene liner is high, we abandoned the use of this implant.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: 17 revisions in 11 patients followed for 4-12 years

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) is complicated by the young age of the patient, poor bone stock and small physical proportions. We report the complications and outcome of a prospective series of 17 revision THAs in Charnley class C JCA patients. METHODS: 15 acetabular components and 10 femoral components were revised. 13 cementless cups, 2 reconstruction/roof rings and cemented cups, and 4 cemented and 6 cementless femoral stems were implanted. 2 proximal femoral allografts and 1 strut allograft were used. Age at revision was 32 (21-53) years. Follow-up averaged 7 (4-12) years. RESULTS: 2 patients with cemented femoral stems developed loosening, osteolysis and fracture. Both were successfully revised to long-stem cementless implants with strut/proximal femoral allografts. 1 loose, worn cementless cup with osteolysis was revised. 1 patient with a peri-operative infection and late acetabular fracture had a loose, non-revised cementless cup. 1 case of sciatic nerve palsy occurred after revision using a reconstruction ring. 1 late infection necessitated resection arthroplasty. Harris hip scores improved from 53 (34-85) to 76 (47-96). INTERPRETATION: Revision THA in JCA has a substantial complication rate, even in experienced hands. The problem of obtaining long-term stable fixation, osteolysis, and replenishment of lost bone stock are major difficulties.     

Precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Results of 5- to 9-year followup.

One hundred nineteen consecutive primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties with a precoated femoral component were performed by one surgeon in 100 patients and followed up prospectively. Ninety-eight hips in 82 patients (mean age, 67 years) were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean of 6.5 years (range, 5-9 years). The hips were evaluated clinically using the Harris hip score, and radiographs were evaluated for femoral cement grade, loosening, and osteolysis. Ninety-five hips remained in place at the most recent followup. Two femoral components were revised for definite loosening, and one well fixed femoral component was removed because of late hematogenous infection. Excluding the three hips that were revised, the clinical result was excellent or good in 79 hips (83%), fair in 12 hips (13%), and poor in four hips (4%). All other femoral components were well fixed. There were defects of the cement mantles (C1 and C2) in 90 hips. No femoral component had a stem and cement radiolucent line. Focal femoral osteolysis was seen in only two hips. One acetabular component was removed at 5 years because of late hematogenous infection. One acetabular component had asymptomatic migration. The remaining 96 acetabular components were well fixed. Focal acetabular osteolysis was present in four hips. The mean linear polyethylene wear rate was 0.06 (+/- 0.05) mm per year. In contrast to other reports of early failure and osteolysis, the use of a precoated femoral component in this study did not adversely affect the fixation of hybrid total hip arthroplasty, with definite failure of only 2% (two of 98) of the femoral components.     

Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years

BACKGROUND: Revision of a total hip arthroplasty in a patient who has had congenital hip dysplasia or dislocation is often more difficult than a standard revision operation. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and complications of use of a cementless hemispherical acetabular component for revision of an acetabular component of a failed total hip replacement in patients whose initial problem was arthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or dysplasia. The mean duration of follow-up was approximately eight years. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of sixty-one hips in fifty-three patients who underwent a cementless acetabular revision with use of a hemispherical acetabular component, with or without concurrent femoral revision. Data were collected prospectively. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index operation was fifty-six years. A mean of 1.9 ipsilateral hip operations had been performed previously. Thirty-nine hips (64 percent) had a so-called high hip center prior to the index revision. With one exception, the uncemented acetabular component was fixed with screws. Fifty-one acetabular components were placed with so-called line-to-line fit, and ten were oversized by one to three millimeters. In thirty-eight hips, the femoral component was revised as well. Twenty-nine femora were reconstructed with use of a cemented device, and nine were revised with an uncemented patch-porous-coated femoral stem (a stem on which the porous coating appears in patches). RESULTS: Four patients (five hips) died prior to the five-year minimum follow-up interval. With the exception of one hip treated with resection arthroplasty because of deep infection, none of the hips in these deceased patients had been revised or had a loose component. One living patient (one hip) had a resection arthroplasty, and one additional patient (two hips) had both stable acetabular components rerevised at the time of femoral rerevision at another institution because of loosening and osteolysis. One patient refused to return for follow-up, but the components had not been revised. The remaining fifty-two hips in forty-six patients were followed for a mean of 8.6 years (range, 5.0 to 12.7 years). The mean Harris hip score was 80 points (range, 56 to 100 points) at the time of the latest follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised, although two had migrated. No other acetabular component was loose according to our radiographic criteria. Thus, the mechanical failure rate on the acetabular side was 3 percent (two of sixty-one) for the entire series and 4 percent (two of fifty-two) for the patients who had been followed for a mean of 8.6 years. On the femoral side, the mechanical failure rate was 3 percent (one of twenty-nine) for the cemented stems and six of nine for the uncemented patch-porous-coated stems. CONCLUSIONS: Of the approaches used in this difficult series of patients requiring revision, the hybrid arthroplasty (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) yielded overall good results after an intermediate duration of follow-up.     

Results of isolated acetabular revisions: The fate of the unrevised femoral component

Controversy exists over whether to remove a well-fixed femoral component at the time of revision of a failed acetabular component, and it has been suggested that the femoral component be removed and recemented. The hypothesis presented in this article is that only the acetabular component should be revised in these situations. Thirty-eight isolated, uncemented acetabular revisions were performed by 1 surgeon and prospectively followed for a mean of 4 years (range, 2–10 years). The femoral component was well fixed at the time of revision and left in situ. There were 30 cemented and 8 uncemented femoral components, which had been in place for a mean of 10.7 years. The hips were evaluated clinically using the Harris hip score rating system. Radiographic evaluation of both components was performed using well-established criteria. Morselized cancellous allograft was used to fill acetabular defects in 30 hips, and a bulk allograft was used in 1 hip. There was a good or excellent clinical result in 32 hips (84%). Two cemented femoral components required revision for aseptic loosening at 2.5 and 4 years. No acetabular component migrated or was revised, and no revisions of either component are pending. Thirty-six (95%) of the unrevised femoral components remain well fixed at the most recent follow-up examination. Compared with a similar population of hips in which both the acetabular and femoral components were revised, the mean blood loss for these revisions was 52% less and the mean surgical time was 35% shorter. Revision of only the acetabular component is recommended for isolated acetabular aseptic loosening. Because the femoral component is not removed, surgical time and blood loss are decreased and serious potential complications related to removing a well-fixed femoral component can be avoided.     

Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first consecutive 154 implantations of a cementless, double-tapered straight femoral stem (cementless Spotorno (CLS), Sulzer Orthopedics) in 141 patients under the age of 55 (mean 47 (13-55)) years. After a mean follow-up of 12 (10-15) years, 11 patients (11 hips) had died and 7 (7 hips) could not be located. 5 patients (5 hips) underwent femoral revision—1 for infection, 1 for periprosthetic fracture and 3 for aseptic loosening of the stem. The overall survival rate of the stem was 97% at 12 years (95% confidence limits, 93%-100%), and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point 98 (95-100)%. The survival rate of the acetabular components was 78 (71-85) % after 12 years. The median Harris hip score at follow-up was 84 points. None of the patients had thigh pain. Radiolucent lines in Gruen regions 1 and 7 were present in 21 hips (17%). 2 hips had radiolucent lines in regions 2-6 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. No femoral osteolysis was detected.

The mid- to long-term survival with this type of femoral component is excellent and compares favorably with cemented stems in this age group. However, the high rate of cup loosening and the low Harris hip scores are a concern in this subgroup of young patients.     

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger

The results of a consecutive series of uncemented total hip arthroplasties in patients 50 years or younger are reviewed. There were 41 total hip arthroplasties in 36 patients at an average follow-up period of 5.3 years. Average patient age was 42 years at the time of implantation. Preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) averaged ; the final HHS averaged 93. Radiographic evaluation revealed that the femoral stems were all solid, with no progressive subsidence, reactive lines, or osteolysis. Twenty of the hips (49%) demonstrated evidence of polyethylene wear. There was significant acetabular osteolysis in 12 of these 20 hips. Five of the acetabular cups were definitely loose; 1 was possibly loose. Three of the patients underwent revision surgery for acetabular loosening and/or osteolysis. It is concluded from this study that the femoral stem is excellent but that the original acetabular component and polyethylene locking mechanism are poor and made even worse with the use of a titanium femoral head.     

Intermediate- to Long-Term Results After Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

There have been few reports describing intermediate- to long-term results after hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We followed up 52 hips in 44 patients aged 5 men and 39 women, with a mean of 11.5 years (range, 5-23.5 years). Revisions had been performed in 6 hips in 6 patients: 1 both acetabular and femoral components for infection, 1 acetabular component for aseptic loosening, 3 acetabular components for recurrent dislocation, and 1 acetabular component for dislodgement of the polyethylene liner from the metal shell. None of other acetabular or femoral components were revised or found to be loose at the final follow-up. Although postoperative dislocation remains a concern, hybrid total hip arthroplasty had an acceptable result in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: 17 revisions in 11 patients followed for 4–12 years

Background Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) is complicated by the young age of the patient, poor bone stock and small physical proportions. We report the complications and outcome of a prospective series of 17 revision THAs in Charnley class C JCA patients.

Methods 15 acetabular components and 10 femoral components were revised. 13 cementless cups, 2 reconstruction/roof rings and cemented cups, and 4 cemented and 6 cementless femoral stems were implanted. 2 proximal femoral allografts and 1 strut allograft were used. Age at revision was 32 (21–53) years. Follow-up averaged 7 (4–12) years.

Results 2 patients with cemented femoral stems developed loosening, osteolysis and fracture. Both were successfully revised to long-stem cementless implants with strut/proximal femoral allografts. 1 loose, worn cementless cup with osteolysis was revised. 1 patient with a peri-operative infection and late acetabular fracture had a loose, non-revised cementless cup. 1 case of sciatic nerve palsy occurred after revision using a reconstruction ring. 1 late infection necessitated resection arthroplasty. Harris hip scores improved from 53 (34–85) to 76 (47–96).

Interpretation Revision THA in JCA has a substantial complication rate, even in experienced hands. The problem of obtaining long-term stable fixation, osteolysis, and replenishment of lost bone stock are major difficulties.     

Long-term results of the cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis

Between January 1984 and January 1986, 131 porous-coated anatomic total hip replacements were performed in 119 consecutive patients. Of these, 100 patients (110 hips) who were alive at a minimum of 18 years after replacement were included in the study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 48.4 years and that of surviving patients at the latest follow-up was 67.8 years. The mean duration of the clinical and radiological follow-up was 19.4 years (18 to 20). The mean Harris hip score initially improved from 55 points before to 95 points at two years after operation, but subsequently decreased to 91 points after six years, 87 points after 11.2 years, and 85 points after 19.4 years. At the final follow-up, 23 hips (18%) of the entire cohort and 21% of survivors had undergone revision because of loosening or osteolysis of the acetabular component and eight hips (6%) of the entire cohort and 7% of survivors for loosening or osteolysis of the femoral component. Only four femoral components (4%) were revised for isolated aseptic loosening without osteolysis and two (2%) for recurrent dislocation. On the basis of these long-term results, the porous-coated anatomic femoral component survived for a minimum of 18 years after operation while the acetabular component was less durable. The findings identify the principles of uncemented joint replacement which can be applied to current practice.     

Isolated Acetabular Revision Hip Arthroplasty with the Use of Uncemented Cup

We evaluated the clinical and radiological results of isolated acetabular revision hip arthroplasty. Forty-three hips underwent isolated acetabular revision with uncemented cup and were followed up for an average of 76 months. The monoblock femoral stems were used in 20 hips and modular femoral stems in 23 hips. The average Harris Hip Score improved to 87 at last follow-up from 57 preoperatively. All femoral stems maintained stable fixation with bone ingrowth and no subsidence at last follow-up. Five hips with the monoblock stem underwent rerevision due to loosening of cup with osteolysis. The isolated acetabular revision is encouraging, but in reflection of the results of the monoblock head, the visual inspection of the femoral head is not enough for evaluation of its surface status.     

Bilateral cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty

A subjective, clinical, and radiographic comparison was made between 140 primary cemented and cementless femoral components in 70 patients <50 years old who underwent bilateral simultaneous total hip arthroplasty. The average duration of follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 7-9 years). Hip scores were similar in both groups at the final follow-up. The prevalence of transitory thigh pain was 17% in the cementless group and 3% in the cemented group. No hip had subsidence or aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral components in either group. One cemented hip was revised for late infection, and 1 cementless hip was revised for recurrent dislocation. There was no difference in the incidence of osteolysis in the femur (9% in the cemented hip vs 13% in the cementless hip) and acetabulum (9% each) between the groups.