Pegvisomant treatment in gigantism caused by a growth hormone-secreting giant pituitary adenoma.

BACKGROUND: Gigantism is rare with the majority of cases caused by a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma. Treatment options for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas have been widened with the availability of long-acting dopamine agonists, depot preparations of somatostatin analogues, and recently the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant. CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old male patient presented with continuous increase in height during the past 6 years due to a GH-secreting giant pituitary adenoma. Because of major intracranial extension and failure of octreotide treatment to shrink the tumour, the tumour was partially resected by a trans-frontal surgical approach. At immunohistochemistry, the tumour showed a marked expression of GH and a sparsely focal expression of prolactin. Somatostatin receptors (sst) 1-5 were not detected. Tumour tissue weakly expressed dopamine receptor type 2. The Gs alpha subunit was intact. Conversion from somatostatin analogue to pegvisomant normalized insulin-like-growth-factor-I (IGF-I) levels and markedly improved glucose tolerance. CONCLUSION: Pegvisomant is a potent treatment option in patients with pituitary gigantism. In patients who do not respond to somatostatin analogues, knowledge of the SST receptor status may shorten the time to initiation of pegvisomant treatment.     

Cabergoline in acromegaly

Acromegaly, a rare disease due to growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion by a pituitary adenoma, is associated with severe comorbidity and premature death if not adequately treated. The usual first-line treatment is surgery. Various drugs, including somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists and GH receptor antagonists, are now available for use if surgery fails to suppress GH/IGF-I hypersecretion. Cabergoline, now the preferred dopamine agonist for treating hyperprolactinemia, is also used off-label for treating acromegaly. Cabergoline monotherapy is reported to normalize IGF-I levels in more than one-third of patients with acromegaly. When a somatostatin receptor ligand proves ineffective, cabergoline add-on therapy normalizes the IGF-I level in 40–50% of patients. Finally, when combined with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with mild uncontrolled disease, cabergoline helps to achieve normal IGF-I levels while avoiding the need for high-dose pegvisomant. Cabergoline is also inexpensive and well tolerated; in particular, it does not appear to promote heart valve disease.     

Case study of a 15-year-old boy with McCune-Albright syndrome combined with pituitary gigantism: effect of octreotide-long acting release (LAR) and cabergoline therapy

The use of octreotide-LAR and cabergoline therapy has shown great promise in adults with acromegaly; however, the experience in pediatric patients has rarely been reported. We described a clinical course of a 15-year-old boy of McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) with pituitary gigantism. At the age of 8 years, a growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) producing pituitary adenoma was diagnosed at our hospital. He also had multiple fibrous dysplasia, so that he was diagnosed as having MAS. The tumor was partially resected, and GNAS1 gene mutation (R201C) was identified in affected tissues. We introduced octreotide to suppress GH secretion (100 mug 2/day s.c). During therapy with octreotide, IGF-1 and GH levels could not be suppressed and the patient frequently complained of nausea from octreotide treatment. Therefore, the therapy was changed to monthly injections of octreotide-LAR at the age of 12.3 years and was partially effective. However, as defect of left visual field worsened due to progressive left optic canal stenosis, he underwent second neurological decompression of the left optic nerve at 13.4 years of age. After surgery, in addition to octreotide-LAR, cabergoline (0.25 mg twice a month) was started. This regimen normalized serum levels of GH and IGF-1; however, he showed impaired glucose tolerance and gallstones at 15.7 years of age. Therefore, the dose of octreotide-LAR was reduced to 10 mg and the dose of cabergoline increased. This case demonstrated the difficulty of treating pituitary gigantism due to MAS. The use of octreotide-LAR and cabergoline should be considered even in pediatric patients; however, adverse events due to octreotide-LAR must be carefully examined.     

Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with pituitary gigantism

Pituitary gigantism, a condition of endogenous growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion prior to epiphyseal closure, is a rare condition. In the adult condition of GH excess, acromegaly, the occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have been reported, with resolution following normalization of GH levels. We report the case of a 16-year-old male with pituitary gigantism due to a large invasive suprasellar adenoma who presented with T2DM and DKA. Despite surgical de-bulking, radiotherapy and medical treatment with cabergoline and pegvisomant, GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels remained elevated. However, the T2DM and recurrent DKA were successfully managed with metformin and low-dose glargine insulin, respectively. We review the pathophysiology of T2DM and DKA in growth hormone excess and available treatment options.     

Remission of acromegaly following long-term therapy with cabergoline: report of two cases

Dopamine agonists are effective in some patients with acromegaly and in this condition treatment is considered to be chronic. We describe two acromegalic patients who responded adequately to the long-acting dopamine agonist cabergoline, but surprisingly maintained normal GH and IGF-I levels once therapy was discontinued after 42 and 76 months because of possibly related side effects. A 32-year-old woman with mild acromegaly (IGF-I: 423 μg/l, GH after OGTT: 2.5 μg/l, adenoma 4 mm) was treated with cabergoline as primary therapy and reached safe GH levels (2 μg/l or less) and normal IGF-I levels with 3.5 mg cabergoline weekly. After 42 months of therapy the patient experienced a progressive decrease of libido, which she attributed to the intake of cabergoline. After stopping medication, serum levels of GH and IGF-I remained normal during the following 2.5 years. A 53-year-old man with moderate acromegaly (serum IGF-I: 547 μg/l, GH after OGTT: 5.9 μg/l, adenoma 7 mm) preferred cabergoline as primary therapy. Serum GH levels below 2 μg/l and normal levels of IGF-I were obtained with 3.5 mg cabergoline weekly. When the patient experienced severe stomach pains after 76 months of treatment, cabergoline was held responsible and discontinued. Serum GH and IGF-I did not increase again and stayed at the same level during a follow-up of 5.5 years. These two cases demonstrate that acromegalic patients with a good response to cabergoline may occasionally remain in remission after stopping therapy. This phenomenon has previously only been described in patients with a prolactinoma.     

Gender, body weight, disease activity, and previous radiotherapy influence the response to pegvisomant

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To effectively normalize IGF-I in patients with acromegaly, various covariates may affect dosing and plasma concentrations of pegvisomant. We assessed whether sex, age, weight, and previous radiotherapy influence dosing of pegvisomant in patients with active disease. DESIGN: Data from 69 men and 49 women participating in multicenter, open-label trials of pegvisomant were retrospectively evaluated using multiple regression techniques. Sixty-nine subjects (39 men, 30 women) had undergone external beam pituitary radiotherapy. Serum IGF-I was at least 30% above age-related upper limit of normal in all patients at study entry. After a loading dose of pegvisomant (80 mg), patients were commenced on 10 mg/d. Pegvisomant dose was adjusted by 5 mg every eighth week until serum IGF-I was normalized. RESULTS: At baseline, men had significantly higher mean serum IGF-I levels than women despite similar GH levels. After treatment with pegvisomant, IGF-I levels were similar in men and women. A significant correlation between baseline GH, IGF-I, body weight, and the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I was observed (all P < 0.001). Women required an average of 0.04 mg/kg more pegvisomant than men and a mean weight-corrected dose of 19.2 mg/d to normalize serum IGF-I [14.5 mg/d (men); P < 0.001]. Patients treated with radiotherapy required less pegvisomant to normalize serum IGF-I despite similar baseline GH/IGF-I levels (15.2 vs. 18.5 mg/d for no previous radiotherapy; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Sex, body weight, previous radiotherapy, and baseline GH/IGF-I influence the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I in patients with active acromegaly.     

Successful treatment of resistant acromegaly with a growth hormone receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Pegvisomant is a pegylated analogue of human GH and functions as a potent GH receptor antagonist. This novel mode of action gives it the potential to achieve biochemical control in patients with acromegaly whose disease activity cannot be satisfactorily controlled by conventional therapy. We have documented the clinical details of seven patients with residual active acromegaly after surgery and/or radiation therapy successfully treated with pegvisomant. PATIENTS/METHODS: Seven patients (four male, mean age 47 years, range 34-67 years) who participated in two separate clinical trials of pegvisomant have completed 2 years (four patients) or 1 year (three patients) of treatment. All had active acromegaly (mean serum GH level >5 mU/l; serum IGF-I elevated for age) that could not be controlled with standard medical therapy (dopamine agonist and/or a somatostatin analogue) following appropriate primary treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy. RESULTS: On a median dose of 20 mg/day (range 15-40) pegvisomant, serum IGF-I fell from a mean of 920+/-351 ng/ml (s.d.) to 258+/-91 ng/ml and was normalised in all seven patients. These changes were associated with improvements in soft tissue enlargement and general well being. Treatment was well tolerated and no change in pituitary tumour size was evident on MRI scans performed every 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pegvisomant is safe and efficacy is maintained after 2 years. Serum IGF-I may be normalised in patients who are refractory to conventional therapy.     

Pegvisomant: an advance in clinical efficacy in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a chronic disorder invariably caused by a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumour and is characterised by disabling symptoms (sweating, arthralgia, headache, paraesthesiae, fatigue), significant comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, sleep apnoea), and premature mortality. Symptomatic control can be achieved by lowering insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations to within the age-adjusted normal range, and survival can be improved to match that of the general population. However, even with optimal surgery and current medical therapies (dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogues), 30% to 50% of patients do not achieve target concentrations of IGF-I and GH. Pegvisomant is a new GH-receptor antagonist that blocks GH activity by inhibiting functional dimerisation of GH-receptors. Given as subcutaneous injections at dosages of 10 mg, 15 mg, or 20 mg/day for 3 Months, pegvisomant normalised serum IGF-I concentrations in, respectively, 54%, 81%, and 89% of acromegalic patients. Moreover, long-term pegvisomant therapy normalised IGF-I concentrations in 97% of patients treated for 12 Months or longer, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis. Pegvisomant is the most effective medical therapy, reported to date, in terms of normalisation of circulating IGF-I concentrations. In addition, pegvisomant appears to be safe and well tolerated. Although additional long-term studies are required to further assess safety, the introduction of this innovative treatment should allow for optimal disease control in patients with acromegaly.     

Long-term experience of pegvisomant therapy as a treatment for acromegaly

Aims  To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pegvisomant as a treatment for acromegaly.
Design  Retrospective analysis of clinical and trial data from all patients treated with pegvisomant since 1997 at two centres with common protocols.
Results  Fifty-seven patients (age range 27–78 years) have been treated with pegvisomant since 1997 for up to 91 months (median 18 months). Before commencing pegvisomant, patients had an IGF-I above the upper limit of normal (ULN) of the age-related reference range (median 1·8 × ULN, range 1·2–4·1). Ninety-five per cent normalized IGF-I using a median dose of 15 mg daily (range 10 mg alternate day to 60 mg daily) with no influence of gender on dose requirement. Five patients had combination therapy with either somatostatin analogues (SSA) or cabergoline. Two patients initially controlled on 10 mg and 20 mg required dose increases (to 20 mg + 40 mg) over 24 months to reduce IGF-I. Twenty-seven patients stopped pegvisomant. Reasons included side-effects [abnormal liver function tests (LFTs)] and patient choice. Two patients developed elevated liver transaminases, which normalized on stopping pegvisomant. Patients had 6–12-monthly pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. One patient had significant tumour size increase.
Conclusion  This long-term experience in 57 patients indicates pegvisomant to be effective, safe and well-tolerated. Raised transaminases occurred within the first month of therapy in two patients, and tumour growth was seen in one patient (tumour was growing prior to pegvisomant). In two patients increasing doses of pegvisomant were required to keep IGF-I within the target range.     

Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma in a man with gigantism: a case report.

A prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma was removed trans-sphenoidally from a 37 years old man with gigantism (218 cm). Serum levels of prolactin (PRL) were elevated pre-operatively and decreased after administration of L-Dopa with no increase after TRH as is usually observed in PRL-secreting adenomas. Growth hormone (GH) and somatomedin serum levels were normal with no modification of GH after insulin hypoglycemia, oral glucose loading or L-Dopa. Morphological examination of the tumour demonstrated the presence of lactotrophs by light and electron microscopy and by immunofluorescense staining. No somatotrophs were found. In this unique case, the relationship between a PRL-secreting adenoma and gigantism is discussed.     

Cotreatment of acromegaly with a somatostatin analog and a growth hormone receptor antagonist

CONTEXT: Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist that blocks the peripheral actions of GH in acromegaly. Pegvisomant, in contrast to somatostatin (SMS) analogs, does not suppress the activity of the GH-producing adenoma. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects of cotreatment with pegvisomant and SMS in acromegaly on GH secretion, IGF-I levels, and glucose tolerance. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Eleven patients with persistent disease despite previous therapy underwent the following fixed treatment algorithm: 1) on SMS therapy, 2) off therapy for 2 months, 3) 6-wk treatment with 10 mg/d pegvisomant, 4) 6-wk treatment with 15 mg/d pegvisomant, and 5) 3-month treatment with 15 mg pegvisomant plus SMS. Blood was sampled in the fasting state and during an oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: Total serum IGF-I levels (micrograms per liter) decreased after pegvisomant, but the lowest levels were obtained with cotreatment [458 +/- 67 (SMS), 562 +/- 78 (active), 376 +/- 51 (10 mg), 269 (15 mg), 195 +/- 24 (combined) (P < 0.0001)]. Free and bioactive IGF-I changed in a similar pattern. Steady-state pegvisomant levels (micrograms per liter) were obtained, but SMS cotreatment increased pegvisomant levels by 20% (P = 0.02) [2631 +/- 616 (10 mg), 6536 +/- 1413 (15 mg), 8030 +/- 1914 (combined)]. Pegvisomant increased endogenous GH levels (micrograms per liter), which was countered by SMS cotreatment [5.1 +/- 1.3 (SMS), 8.9 +/- 2.9 (active), 14.6 +/- 4.9 (10 mg), 19.7 +/- 6.5 (15 mg), 11.8 +/- 2.8 (combined) (P < 0.01)]. Plasma glucose levels (millimoles per liter) were highest during SMS and lowest during pegvisomant 15 mg [2-h oral glucose tolerance test: 10.3 +/- 0.7 (SMS), 8.9 +/- 0.7 (active), 7.2 +/- 0.7 (10 mg), 6.5 +/- 0.5 (15 mg), 8.0 +/- 0.8 (combined) (P = 0.02)]. CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the GH axis with pegvisomant and a SMS analog is feasible in acromegaly.     

Cabergoline Therapy of Growth Hormone & Growth Hormone/Prolactin Secreting Pituitary Tumors

Dopamine agonists have been used as adjunctive therapy for acromegaly for many years, but relatively few studies have assessed the efficacy of a newer agonist, cabergoline. Some data suggest that cabergoline may be more effective than bromocriptine, in particular for those patients whose tumors secrete both growth hormone and prolactin. In order to assess this possibility further, we have evaluated the biochemical response to cabergoline therapy in patients with acromegaly at our center. We describe first an unusual patient who presented with a pituitary macroadenoma secreting both GH and prolactin. At presentation he had elevated levels of growth hormone 6.0 microg/L, IGF-I, 722 ng/ml, and prolactin, 6000 ng/ml. Cabergoline therapy alone was highly effective in this patient and normalized his levels of all three hormones and his gonadal function as well as produced significant shrinkage of his pituitary tumor. Fourteen other patients with more typical, active postoperative acromegaly were administered cabergoline in a 6-month, open label, dose-escalation study. Mean baseline GH was 1.3 +/- .23 ng/ml and fell to a nadir of 0.85 +/- .18 ng/ml on cabergoline therapy (p = 0.03). Mean baseline IGF-I was 520 +/- 45.2 ng/ml and fell to a mean nadir during cabergoline therapy of 368 +/- 29.8 ng/ml (p = 0.0013). At the completion of the cabergoline therapy study period, however, mean IGF-I was 453 +/- 46 ng/ml, not significantly lower than the baseline value (p = 0.11). No changes in tumor sizes occurred on cabergoline therapy. Eight of 14 patients achieved a normal IGF-I at some point during the 24 weeks study period, but the efficacy of cabergoline waned with time as only 3 of 14 (21%) of patients had a persistently normal IGF-I with up to 18 months of cabergoline therapy. Six patients had modest hyperprolactinemia at diagnosis (26-142 ng/ml) and 5 patients had positive immunohistochemical staining of their tumor for prolactin, but in neither of these small groups was cabergoline therapy more effective at normalizing IGF-I than in those patients with apparently pure GH secreting tumors. Three of 14 patients (21%) had side effects that limited therapy. A trial of cabergoline as adjunctive therapy may be considered in select patients with mild disease and small tumor residuals, but the expectation for biochemical control in these patients needs to be kept low, even for tumors that co-secrete GH and prolactin.     

A case of macroprolactinoma with subclinical growth hormone production

We describe a rare case of macroprolactinoma with subclinically synchronous growth hormone (GH) production. A 59-year-old man with a giant adenoma in his pituitary had elevated serum prolactin (PRL) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels, despite normal levels of basal GH. Serum GH levels were paradoxically increased in response to an intravenous administration of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). Prolonged exposure to glucose as a result of oral glucose tolerance testing (oGTT) failed to decrease GH levels. Two-week treatment with cabergoline, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist, decreased serum PRL and GH levels, and size of the tumor. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization revealed PRL-producing cells capable of synchronous GH production. Acidophilic stem cell adenoma may be responsible for these phenomena. The nature of high proliferation and invasive tumor growth should be kept in mind when managing patients with this cell type of adenoma. IGF-I levels should be followed in PRLoma, even when basal GH levels are within the normal range, because mixed PRL- and GH-producing tumors would lie underneath. Further endocrinological examinations such as TRH test and oGTT are recommended when elevated IGF-I levels are detected.     

McCune-Albright syndrome and acromegaly: effects of hypothalamopituitary radiotherapy and/or pegvisomant in somatostatin analog-resistant patients

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly, which may be present in patients with McCune-Albright syndrome (MCAS), in association with café-au-lait spots, precocious puberty, and fibrous dysplasia, is often difficult to treat surgically because skull base bone dysplasia prevents the removal of the pituitary adenoma. Somatostatin analogs (SAs) generally give only partial responses. The use of radiotherapy (RT) is controversial because of a possible risk of bone sarcomatous transformation. AIM: This study was a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and adverse effects of different treatment modalities in six patients with both MCAS and acromegaly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Because surgery was impossible and SA failed to normalize GH/IGF-I hypersecretion, five of the six patients received fractionated RT (45-55 Grays). Three patients (two with previous RT) were also prescribed pegvisomant. We analyzed the clinical features of acromegaly, GH, and IGF-I concentrations and bone radiological features. RESULTS: GH and IGF-I concentrations fell after RT (median follow-up, 5 yr; range, 0.5-9 yr). Symptoms of acromegaly improved in parallel. Bone sarcomatous transformation was only noted in one patient in a region (the mandible) outside the radiation field. RT alone and/or combined with SA failed to normalize GH/IGF-I levels in the five patients concerned. In contrast, IGF-I levels normalized very rapidly (5-9 months) in the three patients receiving pegvisomant (10-20 mg/d). CONCLUSION: RT may be an option for the treatment of acromegaly in patients with MCAS when surgery is impossible and SA therapy is ineffective. However, although no bone sarcomatous transformation was observed within the radiation field in this series, this risk cannot be ruled out. As shown in this small series of severely affected patients, pegvisomant therapy may thus be useful to normalize IGF-I levels rapidly.     

Cyproheptadine-mediated inhibition of growth hormone and prolactin release from pituitary adenoma cells of acromegaly and gigantism in culture

The effect of cyproheptadine on growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (Prl) secretion from cultured pituitary adenoma cells of acromegaly and pituitary gigantism was studied. When varying doses of cyproheptadine ranging from 0.01 to 1 microM were added to the incubation media, GH secretion was consistently inhibited and a dose-response relationship was observed between the cyproheptadine concentrations and the amounts of GH released into the media. In pituitary adenomas which concurrently produced and secreted Prl, cyproheptadine likewise suppressed Prl release in a dose-related manner. This effect of cyproheptadine was not blocked by coincubation with serotonin. Similarly, coincubation with a dopaminergic antagonist, haloperidol, failed to reverse the inhibitory action produced by cyproheptadine. When coincubated with dopamine, cyproheptadine further inhibited GH and Prl secretion. These results suggest that cyproheptadine possesses a direct action on human somatotroph adenoma cells to inhibit GH and Prl secretion by an unknown mechanism that is different from serotonergic and dopaminergic systems.     

Pituitary gigantism in a 31 month old girl: endocrine studies and successful response to hypophysectomy

A case of pituitary gigantism occurring in a 31 month old female child is reported. Growth records indicate that the disorder began early in the second yr of life. Apart from her size and history of excessive sweating, there were no characteristic clinical features of endocrinopathy. Elevated and autonomous secretion of GH (60-109 microgram/l) and prolactin were corrected by the removal of an eosinophilic pituitary adenoma. In the subsequent 6 yr, despite the presence of immunoreactive GH (4.6-17.3 microgram/l), plasma somatomedin was subnormal and the patient showed growth failure which responded normally to exogenous GH therapy. This case, which appears to be the youngest example of verified pituitary gigantism on record, illustrates that a successful outcome can be achieved by surgical ablative therapy.     

Disease activity in acromegaly may be assessed 6 weeks after discontinuation of pegvisomant

OBJECTIVE: Pegvisomant, a modified growth hormone (GH) molecule, is a novel medical therapy for acromegaly that functions as a GH receptor antagonist. Serum GH cannot be used as a marker of disease activity in patients taking this form of therapy, partly because GH levels rise on pegvisomant and partly because the drug cross-reacts with many routine GH assays. The purpose of this study was to assess the time for which it is necessary to discontinue pegvisomant prior to biochemical reassessment of acromegaly. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 13 patients (seven male, median age 61 years, range 43-77) enrolled in two separate, open-label studies of the efficacy and tolerability of pegvisomant in the treatment of acromegaly. All had been taking a stable dose of pegvisomant (median dose 15 mg daily, range 10-30) as monotherapy for at least 3 months before discontinuing the drug. After discontinuation of pegvisomant, serum IGF-I was measured at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks in all patients. Serum GH (single sample) was measured in nine patients at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, but not at baseline on account of the cross-reactivity of pegvisomant with the GH assay. RESULTS: Mean serum IGF-I rose from 210+/-105 ng/ml (S.D.) at baseline to 392+/-175 ng/ml at 2 weeks after discontinuation of pegvisomant (P < 0.0001). Although there was no statistically significant change in mean serum IGF-I beyond 2 weeks (412+/-181, 392+/-152 and 399+/-150ng/ml at 4, 6 and 8 weeks respectively; P = 0.13 (2 vs 4 weeks), 0.31 (4 vs 6 weeks) and 0.46 (6 vs 8 weeks), serum IGF-I rose by more than twice the interassay coefficient of variation (CV) in two of the 13 patients between weeks 2 and 4. The standard deviation of the difference in serum IGF-I between time points was calculated. The values declined from 118% (weeks 0-2) 17%, 19.7% and 10% (weeks 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8 respectively). The expected measure if there was no systematic change in base would be 15% (1.4 x interassay CV). Mean serum GH was virtually unchanged at 2-8 weeks after cessation of pegvisomant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the activity of acromegaly may be assessed by serum IGF-I levels 6 weeks after the discontinuation of pegvisomant.     

Estimation of efficacy of the octreotide LAR administration in the patients with somatotropinoma

Acromegaly is caused by excessive secretion of growth hormone by a hypophyseal adenoma type of somatotropinoma. IGF-I is formed in the liver and mediates most biological actions of GH. Treatment of adenomas, which secrete GH, involves pharmacotherapy followed by surgery. Modern pharmacotherapy leaning is based on somatostatin analogues (factor restrictive secretion GH): octreotide, octreotide LAR and lanreotide. The aim of our study was estimation of efficiency of octreotide LAR in the patients with somatotropinoma prepared to neurosurgery intervention. We examined 16 patients (10 of women and 6 men) with the features of active acromegaly. In all cases the increased concentration of HGH and IGF-I were observed. The presence of pituitary adenoma in all patients was confirmed by MRI. The patients were treated with octreotide LAR monthly in dose 20 mg and 30 mg respectively. Before and after application of somatostatin analogues the concentration HGH, IGF-I, PRL in serum were marked. The concentration of GH before octreotide LAR therapy in all patients increased remarkable and ranged from 15.6 to 78.6 ng/ml, mean: 31.20 +/- 16.84 (norm: 0-10 ng/ml), also, in all cases the serum IGF-I level was increased and ranged from 451 to 1107.6 ng/ml, mean: 801.75 +/- 207.82 (norm: 100-400 ng/ml). The prolactin concentration ranged from 7.4 to 49.9 ng/ml, mean: 22.8 +/- 13.7 (norm: 2-20 ng/ml) and in 8 (50%) cases the increased of PRL concentration in serum was observed. After the administration of octreotide LAR the level of: GH [mean: 12.99 +/- 17.16 ng/ml (p < 0.001)], of IGF-I [mean 422.8 +/- 229 ng ml (p < 0.01)] statistical important decreased and prolactin in 8 with increased concentration [mean: 12.45 +/- 5.57 (p < 0.01)] were observed. Long acting somatostatin analogues--octreotide LAR is particular efficient in lowering of growth hormone and IGF-I in patients with somatotropinoma and shows efficiency in normalization of increased prolactin concentration. Because of extreme effectiveness of octreotide LAR, it should be used the routine treatment at the patients suffering from active acromegaly and preparing to neurosurgical treatment.     

Effects of fasting and pegvisomant on the GH‐releasing hormone and GH-releasing peptide-6 stimulated growth hormone secretion

OBJECTIVE: Pegvisomant is a mutated GH molecule which prevents functional dimerization and subsequent activation of the growth hormone receptor. Pegvisomant and fasting both lead to GH resistance. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study comparing the effects of pegvisomant and fasting on the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)- and GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6)-stimulated GH-release before and after 3 days of fasting in 10 healthy lean male subjects. We also performed a single-arm open label study under nonfasting conditions in five of these subjects. On day 1, in random order, at 0800 h, a GHRP-6 or GHRH test was performed. At 1600 h, a GHRH (if the first test was a GHRP-6 test) or GHRP-6-test (if the first test was a GHRH test) was done. After the second test either pegvisomant (80 mg as a single subcutaneous injection) or placebo was administered. On day 4, GHRP-6 and GHRH tests were performed in the same order as on day 1. During the cross-over study, subjects fasted from 2400 h on day 1 until the end of the study. MEASUREMENTS: During the GH stimulation tests, blood samples were drawn every 15 min from 15 to 120 min. GH was determined in all samples. Total insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and free IGF-I were determined from the samples at 0 min only. RESULTS: Three days of fasting alone and pegvisomant alone as well as in combination increased GH concentrations, whereas a decrease in serum-free, but not total, IGF-I concentrations was observed. On day 4, fasting and pegvisomant, either alone or in combination, significantly increased GH concentrations after GHRH compared to baseline. Pegvisomant alone did not increase GH concentrations after GHRP-6 administration. Fasting alone increased GH levels after GHRP-6 administration. The combination of fasting and pegvisomant had a synergistic effect on GH release after GHRP-6. CONCLUSION: These human in vivo data suggest that: (1) circulating free IGF-I, and not total IGF-I, is the major component in the negative feedback on GH secretion; (2) increased pituitary GHRH receptor expression plays a role in the mechanism whereby fasting leads to increased GH concentrations; (3) in vivo, GHRP-6 sensitivity seems to be regulated primarily by metabolic factors and not by changes in GH-IGF-I axis.