The contribution of nurse practitioners and physician assistants to generalist care in Washington State

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the total contribution to generalist care made by nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in Washington State. DATA SOURCES: State professional licensure renewal survey data from 1998-1999. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. Data on medical specialty, place of practice, and outpatient visits performed were used to estimate productivity of generalist physicians, NPs, and PAs. Provider head counts were adjusted for missing specialty and productivity data and converted into family physician full-time equivalents (FTEs) to facilitate estimation of total contribution to generalist care made by each provider type. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Nurse practitioners and physician assistants make up 23.4 percent of the generalist provider population and provide 21.0 percent of the generalist outpatient visits in Washington State. The NP/PA contribution to generalist care is higher in rural areas (24.7 percent of total visits compared to 20.1 percent in urban areas). The PAs and NPs provide 50.3 percent of generalist visits provided by women in rural areas, 36.5 percent in urban areas. When productivity data were converted into family physician FTEs, the productivity adjustments were large. A total of 4,189 generalist physicians produced only 2,760 family physician FTEs (1 FTE = 105 outpatient visits per week). The NP and PA productivity adjustments were also quite large. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates of available generalist care must take into account the contributions of NPs and PAs. Additionally, simple head counts of licensed providers are likely to result in substantial overestimates of available care. Actual productivity data or empirically derived adjustment factors must be used for accurate estimation of provider shortages.     

Use of midlevel practitioners to achieve labor cost savings in the primary care practice of an MCO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the savings in labor costs per primary care visit that might be realized from increased use of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in the primary care practices of a managed care organization (MCO). STUDY SETTING/DATA SOURCES: Twenty-six capitated primary care practices of a group model MCO. Data on approximately two million visits provided by 206 practitioners were extracted from computerized visit records for 1997-2000. Computerized payroll ledgers were the source of annual labor costs per practice from 1997-2000. STUDY DESIGN: Likelihood of a visit attended by a PA/NP versus MD was modeled using logistic regression, with practice fixed effects, by department (adult medicine, pediatrics) and year. Parameter estimates and practice fixed effects from these regressions were used to predict the proportion of PA/NP visits per practice per year given a standard case mix. Least squares regressions, with practice fixed effects, were used to estimate the association of this standardized predicted proportion of PA/NP visits with average annual practitioner and total labor costs per visit, controlling for other practice characteristics. RESULTS: On average, PAs/NPs attended one in three adult medicine visits and one in five pediatric medicine visits. Likelihood of a PA/NP visit was significantly higher than average among patients presenting with minor acute illness (e.g., acute pharyngitis). In adult medicine, likelihood of a PA/NP visit was lower than average among older patients. Practitioner labor costs per visit and total labor costs per visit were lower (p<.01 and p=.08, respectively) among practices with greater use of PAs/NPs, standardized for case mix. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices that used more PAs/NPs in care delivery realized lower practitioner labor costs per visit than practices that used less. Future research should investigate the cost savings and cost-effectiveness potential of delivery designs that change staffing mix and division of labor among clinical disciplines.     

Growth and change in the physician assistant workforce in the United States, 1967-2000

The physician assistant (PA) profession grew rapidly in the 1970s and 1990s. As acceptance of PAs in the health care system increased, roles for PAs in specialty care took shape and the scope of PA practice became more clearly defined. This report describes key elements of change in the demography and distribution of the PA population between 1967 and 2000, as well as the spread of PA training programs. Individual-level data from the American Academy of Physician Assistants, supplemented with county-level aggregate data from the Area Resource File, were used to describe the emergence of the PA profession between 1967 and 2000. Data on 49,641 PAs who had completed training by 2000 were analyzed. More than half (52.4%) of PAs active in 2000 were women. PA participation in the rural workforce remains high, with more than 18% of PAs practicing in rural settings, compared with about 20% in 1980. Primary care participation appears to have stabilized at about 47% among active PAs for whom specialty is known. By 2000, 51.5% of practicing PAs had been trained in the states where they worked. The profession has grown rapidly; 56% of all PAs were trained between 1991 and 2000. In 2000, more than 42% of accredited PA programs offered a master's degree, compared to master's degree programs in 1986. Although many critical issues of scope of practice and patient and physician acceptance of PAs have been resolved, the PA profession remains young and continues to evolve. Whether the historical contribution of PAs to primary care for rural and underserved populations can be sustained in the face of increasing specialization and higher-level academic credentialing is not clear.     

Examining attitudes of specialist physicians regarding physician assistant referrals

Referral of a patient from a primary care provider to a referral specialist physician for consultation is an important link in the continuum of patient care. Although the relationship between the physician assistant (PA) and supervising physician has been studied extensively, the effectiveness of the relationship between the primary care PA and the referral specialist physician is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes of the referral specialist physician toward direct referral of patients from primary care PAs. A random sample of 5,000 specialist physicians in five specialty areas across the United States were surveyed to determine their willingness to accept referrals from PAs, their attitudes about the appropriateness of PA referrals, and reasons for dissatisfaction, if any. Data analysis revealed that specialist physicians generally are willing to accept patient referrals from primary care PAs and that specialist physicians generally are satisfied with the appropriateness and timeliness of referrals from PAs. Whether or not the specialist physician employed (supervised) a PA in his or her own practice made a significant difference in level of satisfaction with PA referral. To determine the significance of these results, more research is needed to determine specialist physician satisfaction with referrals from primary care physicians compared with PAs.     

Use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners in primary care, 1995-1999.

Federal policies and state legislation encourage the use of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary care, although the nature of their work has not been fully analyzed. In this paper we analyze primary care physician office encounter data from the 1995-1999 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. About one-quarter of primary care office-based physicians used PAs and/or NPs for an average of 11 percent of visits. The mean age of patients seen by physicians was greater than that for PAs or NPs. NPs provided counseling/education during a higher proportion of visits than did PAs or physicians. Overall, this study suggests that PAs and NPs are providing primary care in a way that is similar to physician care.     

Autonomous ambulatory care by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in office-based settings

Data from the 1997 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were used to examine the autonomous provision of ambulatory medical care by nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in physician-managed office-based settings. An estimated 6.81 million office visits involved autonomous care by NPs and PAs, for an overall rate of 2.55 visits per 100 persons. The visit rates were greatest for patients over 64 years of age, females, blacks, and patients from the Northeast. The visits encompassed a broad range of acute and chronic problems, with a greater proportion of non-illness care visits when compared with visits to physicians. While NPs and PAs provided diagnostic services and pharmacotherapy, there was more emphasis on therapeutic or preventive services in their practices than among physicians' practices. Predisposing, enabling, and need factors were differentially associated with visits to NPs and PAs. Utilization of NPs and PAs as autonomous providers in office-based settings appears limited. Public policy and educational initiatives can focus on predisposing, enabling, and need factors to increase access to autonomous practice of NPs and PAs in ambulatory care.     

Contribution of a nurse clinician to office practice productivity: comparison of two solo primary care practices.

A comparison of two solo primary care practices with similar patient populations reveals a significant difference in productivity. A nurse clinician was employed in the more productive practice. She independently managed 1,848 patient visits a year that would otherwise have required the time and attention of a physician. She contributed to the productivity of the physician by performing some tasks he would normally have performed during visits they managed jointly. It was primarily because of the assistance he received from the nurse clinician that the physician in practice II was 12 percent more productive than the physician in practice I. The nurse clinician and physician managed 31 percent more patient visits during a standard day than the physician in practice I, or a difference of 2,856 patient visits a year. This annual difference is based on a work schedule that could be matched in other practices: an eight-hour day and a 240-day work year.     

Physician assistant practice in Minnesota; providing care as part of a physician-directed team

Physician assistants (PAs) practice medicine with physician supervision, which allows physicians to see more patients and concentrate their efforts on the needs of those with complex medical conditions. Physician assistants have been practicing in Minnesota since 1970. They work in a variety of settings and specialties, although most are in primary care practices. This article profiles the PA profession and describes the type of work PAs do, the training and credentialing required to become a PA, and the relationship between physicians and PAs.     

Physician assistants in occupational medicine: how do they compare to occupational physicians?

BACKGROUND: Physician assistants (PAs) have been present in occupational and environmental medicine (OEM) in the USA since 1971, yet remarkably little is known about their activity. METHODS: An administrative study of PA activities was undertaken and compared with the activities of physicians in the same occupational medicine setting. Patients were not triaged to either provider and all resources of care were recorded for the visit. An episode of care approach was used for the analysis. RESULTS: The characteristics of patients seen by each provider were similar in age, gender ratio and severity of injury. Physicians saw a mean of 2.9 patients/h and PAs 2.5, but PAs worked more hours and saw more patients per year than physicians. The average charge per patient visit and total charge for an episode of care were similar. Differences between PAs and physicians were seen in the areas of 'limited duty' duration given to patients and on average PAs prescribed 15 days and physicians 17 days. PAs referred a patient 19.7% of the time, while physicians referred 17.4%. Most of the referrals were to physical therapy. The salary of a physician, based on an hourly rate, was approximately twice as much as a PA. CONCLUSION: The use of PAs in OEM may represent a cost-effective advantage from an administrative standpoint. Clearly, more research is necessary in determining the role and utilization of PAs in OEM and how they may improve the delivery of physician services.     

Primary Health Care in Community Health Centers and Comparison with Office-Based Practice

We examine the roles of nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and nurse midwives (CNMs) in community health centers (CHCs). We also compare primary care physicians in CHCs with office-based physicians. Estimates are from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative annual survey of nonfederal, office-based patient care physicians and their visits. Analysis of primary care delivery in CHCs and office-based practices are based on 1,434 providers and their visits (n = 32,300). During 2006–2007, on average, physicians comprised 70% of CHC clinicians, with NPs (20%), PAs (9%), and CNMs (1%) making up the remainder. PAs, NPs, and CNMs provided care in almost a third of CHC primary care visits; 87% of visits to these CHC providers were independent of physicians. Types of patients seen by clinicians suggest a division of labor in caring for CHC patients. NPs and PAs were more likely than physicians to report providing health education services. There were no other differences among services examined. Office-based physicians were less likely to work alongside PAs/NPs/CNMs than CHC physicians. CHC staffing is contingent on a variety of providers. CHC staffing patterns may serve as models of primary care staffing for office practices as demand for primary care services nationwide increases.     

Health status and health professional visits in a rural area.

Visits to physicians (MDs), physician assistants (PAs) or nurse practitioners (NPs) by residents of a rural county in the upper-middle west of the United States were analysed in this study. A telephone survey yielded 250 responses. The dependent variable was the natural logarithm of the number of times the respondent had seen a health professional (MD, PA or NP) in the past two years. Predisposing, enabling and medical need variables were tested as potential predictors of visits. Self-rated health status, being unable to perform usual activities, and feeling upset or 'down in the dumps' proved to be important predictors, as was having a usual source of care. Health insurance coverage and family income was not, however. Unexpectedly, smokers also reported more visits. The implications for policy and future research are discussed.     

The role of physician assistants in the delivery of medical care

Although the physician assistant (PA) profession is slightly more than 30 years old, in its short history, it has had a significant impact on the delivery of quality medical care in the United States. There are approximately 34,000 PAs currently in clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to describe the role physician assistants play in the delivery of medical care and the benefits they bring to the health system and to patients.     

Satisfaction and well-being of primary care providers in managed care

We compared perceptions about the practice environment and the job satisfaction of physician assistants (PAs), nurse practitioners (NPs), and primary care physicians in a large group-model HMO. The data source was a self-administered mail survey (average response rate = 79%). PA/NPs and primary care physicians reported that professional autonomy was not a problem and were satisfied with most aspects of practice in this setting. Common areas of dissatisfaction included patient load and amount of time with patients. PA/NPs were more likely than the physicians to experience stress on a daily basis, however, and were less likely to report that they would choose the practice setting again. They also were significantly less satisfied than the physicians with their incomes and fringe benefits. Our findings suggest that more attention should be given to practice conditions and compensation of PAs and NPs in managed care.     

Survey approach to estimating demand for physician assistants

A national probability sample of physicians was surveyed by mail to provide an estimate of the number of job openings for physician assistants (PAs). The responses were used to undertake an empirical analysis of the factors which influence a physician's decision to hire a PA. Estimates were adjusted to account for survey non-response. This approach may be useful for estimating the employment demand for other types of health workers employed by physicians.It was found that in 1976 there was an unconditional demand for 20.338 PAs and a further conditional demand for 3417 PAs. This contrasts sharply with the fact that as of March 1977 only 4845 PAs had graduated from training programs. Approximately 53% of this employment demand was from physicians in the primary care specialties (general/family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, internal medicine, and pediatrics). Of note was the finding that physicians expected to pay PAs a lower salary than was being received in the market place. Further, 27% of physicians not willing to hire PAs indicated lack of knowledge about them as the main reason for not hiring.     

Trends in the supply of physician assistants and nurse practitioners in the United States

In 2001 an estimated 103,612 nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) were in clinical employment in the United States. The roles of PAs and NPs in providing comparable physician services are similar; they differ in that NPs are predominantly in primary care, while PAs are divided between primary and specialty care. PA and NP education processes also differ in the student pool and trends in the output. The combined number of graduates totaled 11,585 in 2001. However, the annual number of NP graduates is declining, while the number of PA graduates is increasing. These observations have implications for the future in the types of patients they see and the degree of health care services they provide.     

The Role of Physician Assistants in Rural Health Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Purpose: A literature review was performed to assess the role of physician assistants (PAs) in rural health care. Four categories were examined: scope of practice, physician perceptions, community perceptions, and retention/recruitment. Methods: A search of the literature from 1974 to 2008 was undertaken by probing the electronic bibliographic databases of English language literature. Criterion for inclusion was original data published on rural PAs. Each paper was assessed and assigned to the four categories. Findings: A total of 51 papers were identified; 28 papers had a primary focus on research and specified PAs in a rural setting. Generally, the literature suggests that PAs provide cost‐efficient and supplemental medical services to underserved rural populations and that these services are valued. It also appears that rural PAs possess a larger scope of practice than urban PAs. This broad range of skills and procedures may be necessary to match the extensive health care needs of underserved rural populations. Over a 35‐year period of examination, the literature improved in numbers of PAs studied and the quality of research. However, the lack of longitudinal studies was considered a shortcoming of rural health PA observational research. Conclusions: Through this review, some insights about the role of PAs emerged. Overall, they seem well adapted to rural health. Important issues regarding the recruitment and retention of PAs to rural populations also emerged. Improvement in enabling legislation contributes to the utilization of PAs in America.     

Preventive care visits with OB/GYNs and generalist physicians among reproductive-age women with chronic conditions

Objective

To examine services delivered during preventive care visits among reproductive-age women with and without chronic conditions by physician specialty.

Data Sources

National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (2011–2018).

Study Design

We examined provision of specific services during preventive care visits by physician specialty among reproductive-age female patients, overall and among women with five common chronic conditions (diabetes, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, and asthma).

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

The sample included preventive visits to OB/GYNs or generalist physicians where the patient was female, age 18–44, and not pregnant.

Principal Findings

In OB/GYN preventive visits, reproductive health services were more likely to be provided, while non-reproductive health services were less likely to be provided, both among reproductive-age female patients overall and among those with chronic conditions. For example, pap tests were provided in 44.5% of OB/GYN preventive visits (95% CI: 40.6–48.4) and in 21.4% of generalist preventive visits (95% CI: 17.2–26.6). Lipid testing was provided in 2.8% of OB/GYN preventive visits (95% CI: 1.7–3.9) and in 30.3% of generalist preventive visits (95% CI: 26.1–34.6).

Conclusions

Understanding the full range of care received in preventive visits across settings could guide recommendations to optimize where reproductive-age women with chronic conditions seek care.