Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years

BACKGROUND: Revision of the femoral component of a total hip replacement with use of cement has been associated with early mechanical failure due to aseptic loosening. The purpose of the present study was to determine the long-term survival after revision of the femoral component with cement and to identify factors that were predictive of failure. METHODS: The results of 129 revision total hip arthroplasties that had been performed with use of a cemented femoral stem were reviewed to determine component survival. Ninety-seven hips that had been followed for a minimum of five years were included in survival analysis and tests of significance. Harris hip scores were used to quantify clinical outcomes. Clinical and surgical factors were analyzed to determine whether they were predictive of failure. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score improved from 52 points preoperatively to 71 points at the time of the most recent follow-up (p < 0.001). The ten-year survival rate was 91% with rerevision of the femoral component because of aseptic loosening as the end point and 71% with mechanical failure as the end point. Patients who were more than sixty years old had greater long-term component survival and less pain than younger patients did (p < 0.05). A good-quality postoperative cement mantle was associated with better long-term radiographic signs of fixation (p < 0.001). Poor femoral bone quality was associated with an increased rate of rerevision for aseptic loosening (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Revision with use of a cemented femoral component remains an option for selected patients, with an acceptable ten-year survival rate and fair radiographic evidence of fixation. Our patients had acceptable clinical outcomes at ten years, and few had notable pain. The best results may be achieved in older patients (those who are sixty years old or more) with adequate bone stock who are managed with modern cementing techniques.     

Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The long-term results of revision of failed primary cemented femoral components with use of cement have been reported, but there is little information about the results of revision of failed uncemented femoral components with use of cement. The purpose of the present study was to examine the minimum five-year results for patients in whom a failed uncemented primary femoral component was revised with use of modern cementing techniques. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive hips (forty-seven patients) in which a failed primary uncemented femoral component was revised with use of cement at one institution from 1985 to 1992 were followed prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision was sixty-seven years. Only seven revisions were performed with a long-stem femoral component. The postoperative cement mantle was classified, according to the system of Mulroy and Harris, as grade A in four hips, grade B in twenty-five, grade C1 in seven, grade C2 in twelve, and grade D in none. RESULTS: Eleven femoral components were removed or revised because of aseptic loosening (ten) or deep infection (one). An additional four unrevised femoral components had evidence of probable or definite loosening at the time of the final radiographic follow-up. Thus, fourteen (29%) of the forty-eight femoral implants demonstrated aseptic loosening during the study period. Five of the twenty-nine hips in which the postoperative cement mantle was classified as grade A or B had mechanical failure at the time of the final follow-up, compared with nine of the nineteen hips in which the postoperative cement mantle was classified as grade C1 or C2 (p < 0.05). Among the hips with surviving prostheses, 79% had had moderate or severe pain preoperatively whereas 25% had moderate or severe pain at the time of the final follow-up. The six-year rate of survival of the femoral component was 72% with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point and 67% with mechanical failure (revision for aseptic loosening or radiographic loosening) as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: While revision of a failed uncemented femoral implant with use of cement provided pain relief and improved function for most patients, the rate of loosening at the time of intermediate-term follow-up was higher than that commonly reported after revision of failed cemented implants with use of cement and also was higher than that commonly reported after revision with use of uncemented extensively porous-coated implants. Bone removal at the time of the initial implantation of the stem and bone loss due to subsequent failure of the uncemented implant often left little intramedullary cancellous bone, which may explain the high rate of loosening observed in the first decade after revision in this series.     

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old

BACKGROUND: Acetabular bone deficiency can present a challenge during total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision acetabular reconstruction with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup in young patients who had preexisting acetabular bone deficiency. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive acetabular reconstructions were performed in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years old (average, 37.2 years old). The impaction bone-grafting technique was used for twenty-three primary and nineteen revision acetabular reconstructions. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-one hips) were available for review after a minimum duration of follow-up of fifteen years. Clinical and radiographic results were assessed, and survivorship analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hips were revised at a mean of twelve years (range, three to twenty-one years) after a primary reconstruction (four hips) or revision reconstruction (four hips). The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in four hips and because of culture-proven septic loosening in two. Two additional cups (both in hips that had had a revision reconstruction) were revised, during revision of the femoral stem, because of wear (one hip) or because of persistent intraoperative instability (one hip). Twenty-eight hips (in twenty-five patients) had retention of the acetabular component for a minimum of fifteen years. The mean Harris hip score for that group was 89 points. Twenty-six of these twenty-eight hips had no or slight pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a twenty-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 94%) with acetabular revision for any reason as the end point and of 91% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 100%) with acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique that is associated with good long-term results in young patients with acetabular bone-stock defects.     

High revision rate after treatment of femoral neck fractures with an optionally (un)cemented stem

Background  The advantages of uncemented and cemented components in hip arthroplasty have been subject of debate. We have studied on a hemiprosthesis, which can be optionally implanted with or without cement. Since the stem geometry and surface in cemented arthroplasty differs from the uncemented one and cannot be fused into one general design, we hypothesised that this hemiprosthesis used without cement has a considerable high revision rate, based on aseptic loosening. Methods  A hemiprosthesis, which is designed for both cemented and uncemented fixation, was used (Conquest, Smith&Nephew). Preoperatively, the choice of whether to use cement or not was based on the shape and bone quality of the femoral canal. Revision rate and indication, mortality, perioperative complications and radiographic features of 151 consecutive hips in 146 patients were evaluated. Results  Twenty-three stems (15%) were implanted with cement and 128 (85%) without. After a mean follow-up of 2 years, a revision rate of 8.6% and a survival percentage of 90% (CI 85–95) were observed. Twelve uncemented stems warranted revision, compared with one cemented stem. Revision because of aseptic loosening was necessary in 7 (6%) stems, all uncemented. No differences in operation-related mortality and morbidity were observed. Conclusion  Because of the rather high revision rate, the authors advice not to use this hemiprosthesis without cement.     

Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients

Introduction  Inferior survival of cemented total hip arthroplasty has been reported after previous femoral osteotomy. We previously presented 5–15 years results of uncemented femoral stems for this subgroup of patients. The purpose of the present study was to re-evaluate that same patient group at 10–20 years follow-up. Materials and methods  Forty-eight hips in 45 patients had undergone conversion THA for a failed intertrochanteric osteotomy of the hip after a mean of 12 years (2–33 years). Mean time of follow-up was 16 years (10–20 years). Results  At the latest follow-up five patients had died (five hips), and one patient (one hip) remained lost to follow-up. Compared to the previous evaluation, one more patient required femoral revision for aseptic loosening giving a total of four patients (four hips) with femoral revision––one for infection and three for aseptic loosening of the stem. Survival of the stem was 91% at 15 and 20 years respectively; survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 93%. The median Harris-Hip-Score at final follow-up was 76 points (previously 80 points). Radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 20 and 17% of hips, respectively. Radiolucencies in other zones were not detected. There was no radiographic evidence of femoral osteolysis, stress-shielding or loosening. Conclusion  The long-term results with this type of uncemented tapered titanium femoral component after proximal femoral osteotomy remain encouraging and compare favorably to those achieved in patients with regular femoral anatomy. This paper has not been under consideration by any other journal. All authors equally contributed to this paper.     

Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy

Introduction Inferior survival of cemented total hip arthroplasty has been reported after previous femoral osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival of uncemented stems after femoral osteotomy.Materials and methods Forty-eight hips in 45 patients had undergone conversion THA for a failed intertrochanteric osteotomy of the hip after a mean of 12 years (2–33 years). Mean time of follow-up was 11 years (5–15 years).Results At follow-up, two patients (three hips) had died, and one patient (one hip) was not located. Three patients (three hips) underwent femoral revision—one for infection and two for aseptic loosening of the stem. Survival of the stem was 94% at 10 years, and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 96%. The median Harris Hip Score at follow-up was 80 points. Radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 14 and 18% of hips, respectively. Radiolucencies in other zones were not detected. There was no radiographic evidence of femoral osteolysis, stress-shielding or loosening.Conclusion The results with this type of uncemented tapered titanium femoral component after proximal femoral osteotomy are encouraging and compare to those achieved in patients with regular femoral anatomy.     

Weber rotation total hip replacement: a prospective 5- to 20-year followup study

Between 1974 and 1989, 315 primary total hip replacements (274 patients) were done using the cemented Weber Rotation prosthesis and standardized operative technique, which was modified for the stem in 1978. After the first postoperative year, all patients had routine clinical and radiologic examinations at 2-year intervals. Twenty-one patients (22 hips) were lost to followup. At the most recent followup, 30 of 293 hips (253 patients) had been revised: 24 hips for aseptic loosening, five hips for infection, and one hip for a femoral fracture. Survivorship analyses with revision for aseptic loosening as an end point for the 315 hips showed 93% and 78% survival after 10 and 15 years, respectively. Separate survival analyses for the socket showed 99% and 89% survival after 10 and 15 years, respectively. The stem had a survival of 94% and 81%, respectively, during the same time. Survival at 15 years with radiologic evidence of loosening as an end point was 85% for the socket and 72% for the stem. The cementing technique and the design of the acetabular component significantly influenced the rate of loosening. Survivorship analyses with revision for aseptic loosening of the socket, using a modified second generation cementing technique and a hemispheric socket, showed 100% survival after 10 years and 98% after 13 years.     

Multi-centre study of cement-in-cement and in-cement femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using polished,stainless steel stems

BackgroundExposure of the acetabular component during revision total hip arthroplasty is often difficult and stems are often difficult to remove. Polished and tapered cemented stems are easily removed and can be easily reconstructed by either cement-in-cement or in-cement technique. This study was a retrospective review of the medium-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty conducted with the Exeter stem fixed by cement-in-cement or in-cement method in four institutions.MethodsThis study included hips (n = 103) reconstructed by cement-in-cement or in-cement technique on the femoral side during revision total hip arthroplasty in four institutions between 2003 and 2015. The mean age at surgery was 71.1 years (range, 43–86 years), and the mean follow-up period was 5.6 years (range, 0–13 years).ResultsRevision arthroplasty was required for acetabular component complications in 69 hips, for dislocation in 25, for infection in eight, and for stem fracture in one hip. Re-revision was required in 10 hips for: infection (n = 6), acetabular component complications (n = 3), and dislocation (n = 1). No radiographic loosening, cement fractures, or osteolysis of the femoral components were observed. Ten-year survival rate was 99% with the endpoint of femoral revision surgery, and 100% with the endpoint of femoral aseptic loosening.ConclusionsThe medium-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty on the femoral side conducted using the cement-in-cement or in-cement technique were favourable, with no cases of aseptic loosening. As long as the bone-cement interface remains robust, there is no need to remove all the cement, and the cement-in-cement or in-cement technique should be used for reconstruction.     

Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results

BACKGROUND: Use of modern cementing techniques for fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty has had excellent clinical and radiographic results in most patients. However, several authors have described early loosening of femoral components with roughened and precoated finishes. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the precoated Iowa stem, which has increased offset, and to compare the results with those of another cemented precoated femoral component with standard offset used at our institution. METHODS: We carried out a prospective analysis of 102 primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) performed with use of the Iowa femoral component in ninety-five patients at our institution. The Iowa stem was used in hips that required greater offset than is available with standard stems as determined by preoperative templating. The average age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was sixty-nine years. Sixteen patients (seventeen hips) died before the forty-eight-month minimum follow-up period had elapsed. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and radiographic follow-up was incomplete for one. The mean duration of clinical and radiographic follow-up of the remaining eighty-two hips in the seventy-six surviving patients was sixty-five months (range, forty-eight to 104 months). RESULTS: The average preoperative Harris hip score of 47 points (range, 16 to 69 points) improved to an average of 87 points (range, 24 to 100 points) at the time of the review. Two hips underwent femoral component revision. Four femoral stems were radiographically loose at an average of thirty-four months. Femoral osteolysis was seen in five hips (6 percent) at an average of fifty-four months postoperatively. No acetabular component was revised because of aseptic loosening. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the seven-year survival rate, with an end point of femoral revision, osteolysis, or stem debonding, was 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of revision, osteolysis, and loosening after total hip arthroplasty with the Iowa femoral component at our institution was higher than that seen in our series of Harris Precoat stems, which had a survival rate of 98.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.00) at ten years with the same end points. The design of the Iowa stem may make it difficult to achieve a good cement mantle, and, in combination with the geometry and increased offset of the stem, may compromise the long-term survival of this cemented femoral component.     

Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first consecutive 154 implantations of a cementless, double-tapered straight femoral stem (cementless Spotorno (CLS), Sulzer Orthopedics) in 141 patients under the age of 55 (mean 47 (13–55)) years. After a mean follow-up of 12 (10–15) years, 11 patients (11 hips) had died and 7 (7 hips) could not be located. 5 patients (5 hips) underwent femoral revision—1 for infection, 1 for periprosthetic fracture and 3 for aseptic loosening of the stem. The overall survival rate of the stem was 97% at 12 years (95% confidence limits, 93%–100%), and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point 98 (95–100)%. The survival rate of the acetabular components was 78 (71–85) % after 12 years. The median Harris hip score at follow-up was 84 points. None of the patients had thigh pain. Radiolucent lines in Gruen regions 1 and 7 were present in 21 hips (17%). 2 hips had radiolucent lines in regions 2–6 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. No femoral osteolysis was detected.

The mid- to long-term survival with this type of femoral component is excellent and compares favorably with cemented stems in this age group. However, the high rate of cup loosening and the low Harris hip scores are a concern in this subgroup of young patients.     

Gute langfristige Nachuntersuchungsergebnisse einer zementierten Titan-Geradschaftprothese

A higher-than-average rate of aseptic loosening has been postulated to be associated with the combination of a titanium stem and bone cement. In this prospective follow-up study we therefore investigated our first consecutive series of 250 implantations of a cemented femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium alloy (BiCONTACT((R)), Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany).Average time of follow-up evaluation was 9.7 years (range 8.7-10.3 years). At follow-up, mean patient age was 81 years; 89 patients with 93 hips have deceased and two could not be located. Follow-up rate was 98.7% for the patients still alive at time of follow-up evaluation. Five patients have been revised, two for infection and one for aseptic loosening of a varus-malaligned stem; two radiologically well-fixed stems had been revised during acetabular revision. Survival estimate showed a calculated cumulative survival rate of 97.5% after 11 years [confidence limits: 99.0% (upper) and 94.1% (lower)]. The average Harris hip score at time of follow-up was 82.25 points.Radiologically, signs of loosening could be detected in 3 stems: in one case varus malalignement deteriorated with time and in 2 cases osteolyses developed together with significant polyethylene wear. All 3 patients experienced only mild pain and revision had not been indicated so far. In conclusion, the long-term follow-up results with this cemented titanium femoral component are encouraging and are comparable to other successful cemented femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. No increased risk for aseptical loosening was associated to the combination of titanium and cement in this specific stem. Design parameters seem to play an important role in the development of aseptic loosening in cemented titanium stems.     

Cementless Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than Fifty with Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Minimum Fifteen-Year Follow-Up

This study aimed to report the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a modular femoral component in patients younger than fifty years with osteonecrosis of femoral head. Sixty-four osteonecrotic hips in fifty-five patients were available for clinical and radiographic analyses at minimum follow-up of fifteen-years. The mean Harris hip score improved from 36 points preoperatively to 92.7 points at final follow-up. Sixty-two (95.3%) hips demonstrated stable bone ingrowth. No hips showed loosening or required revision for aseptic loosening. Survivorship with an end point of stem revision for any reason was 93.8% and for aseptic loosening was 100% at 16.8 years. We believe that cementless THA with a modular stem is a promising procedure for young and active patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.     

Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems: excellent 10-15-year survival in 141 young patients

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first consecutive 154 implantations of a cementless, double-tapered straight femoral stem (cementless Spotorno (CLS), Sulzer Orthopedics) in 141 patients under the age of 55 (mean 47 (13-55)) years. After a mean follow-up of 12 (10-15) years, 11 patients (11 hips) had died and 7 (7 hips) could not be located. 5 patients (5 hips) underwent femoral revision-1 for infection, 1 for periprosthetic fracture and 3 for aseptic loosening of the stem. The overall survival rate of the stem was 97% at 12 years (95% confidence limits, 93%-100%), and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point 98 (95-100)%. The survival rate of the acetabular components was 78 (71-85)% after 12 years. The median Harris hip score at follow-up was 84 points. None of the patients had thigh pain. Radiolucent lines in Gruen regions 1 and 7 were present in 21 hips (17%). 2 hips had radiolucent lines in regions 2-6 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. No femoral osteolysis was detected. The mid- to long-term survival with this type of femoral component is excellent and compares favorably with cemented stems in this age group. However, the high rate of cup loosening and the low Harris hip scores are a concern in this subgroup of young patients.     

Long-term outcome of cemented total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of titanium alloy

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty is a successful treatment for hip diseases including osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and rheumatoid arthritis. Various designs of cemented femoral stems made of stainless steel and titanium alloy have been used. Among them, Charnley-type femoral stems made of stainless steel have often been reported to have good long-term outcome. However, the long-term outcome of the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy is yet to be reported. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the long-term outcome of cemented primary total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy.MethodsBetween October 1988 and February 1997, 341 cemented primary total hip arthroplasties with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy were consecutively performed in our hospital. Among these, 164 patients (211 hips) who underwent this procedure were followed up for more than 12 years, and the surgical hips were analysed clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up period was 20.6 years. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed to assess femoral component survival. Factors affecting stem revision for aseptic loosening were also investigated using log-rank tests.ResultsIn the functional assessment, the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score significantly improved from 47.2 points preoperatively to 79.0 points at the final follow-up. Eventually, 33 femoral stems were revised, of which 12 were revised for aseptic loosening. In the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the 20-year survival rates with stem revision for aseptic loosening and radiological stem loosening at the end points were 95.9% and 97.1%, respectively. Original diagnosis (non-osteoarthritis) was the only significant factor for aseptic loosening of the femoral stem.ConclusionsCemented primary total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy showed excellent outcomes for more than 20 years.     

Excellent Long-Term Survival Rate of Polished,Tapered, Cemented Stems in Patients Aged 35 Years or Younger With Avascular Necrosis or Inflammatory Arthritis of the Hip

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) for avascular necrosis (AVN) or inflammatory arthritis (IA) comes with a relatively high risk of aseptic stem loosening, especially in young patients. There are limited long-term data on the survivorship of polished, tapered, cemented stems in this population. We therefore performed a single-center retrospective study investigating the survival of this particular stem type in young patients with AVN or IA.MethodsAll patients aged ≤35 years who had received a THA for AVN or IA operated on by the senior author between 1990 and 2010 at the University Hospitals Leuven were identified. In total, 85 THAs in 62 patients were included. Primary endpoint was revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening. Secondary endpoints were revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening, revision for other reasons, and the presence of radiolucencies around the components.ResultsThe mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 18.0 ± 5.3 years (range 8.0-28.9). Taking revision for aseptic loosening as endpoint, the survival of cemented stems was 100% after 15 years and 95.1% after 20 years. Survival of uncemented cups (91.3%) was significantly better than survival of cemented cups (50.3%) after 20 years of follow-up for aseptic loosening. Taking revision for any reason as endpoint, the survival of THAs with uncemented and cemented cups was 90% and 43.1% at 20 years respectively. Radiolucencies developed in the cement mantles around 11 of the 81 nonrevised stems, mainly in zones 1 and 7.ConclusionIn this cohort of young patients with high-risk profiles for aseptic stem loosening, polished, tapered, cemented stems showed excellent long-term survival rates and they therefore remain a viable alternative to uncemented stem designs.     

Ten-year survivorship of rough-surfaced femoral stem with geometry similar to Charnley femoral stem

The aim of this study is to review the 10-year results of 269 cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using the Harvard femoral stem with matte surface finish and Charnley stem-like geometry. This is a retrospective cross-sectional survivorship study. We retrospectively reviewed the results of 269 cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using the Harvard femoral stem in 257 patients (men/women 93:164, mean age 71.2 years) between 1990 and 1994. The median duration of follow-up for the surviving implants was 118 (range 60-129) months. Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate the type of osteoarthritis, cement mantle thickness, alignment of the components, presence of aseptic loosening, and radiolucent lines. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to evaluate 10-year survival and the impact of various radiological parameters on the prosthesis survival respectively. Of the 248 eligible patients (260 hips), 6 patients (7 hips) were lost to follow-up, and 67 patients had died at the time of the study; 36 hips (35 patients) underwent revision surgery for aseptic failure (median duration 60 months, range 12-125 months), and 11 hips were revised for septic failure (median duration 24 months, range 10-53 months from the index procedure). The femoral component was revised in all patients, whereas the acetabular component was revised in 27 patients. Ten-year survival for the femoral and acetabular components using aseptic loosening (with and without revision surgery) as an end point was 77.5% (71.5%-83.5%) and 91.1% (87.2%-95%), respectively. Cox regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant (P > 0.05) effect of various radiological parameters on survival rate. Our results demonstrate that the matte surface finish femoral component (with geometry similar to Charnley femoral component) has less satisfactory long-term survival rate.     

Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that cemented femoral components with a polished surface may provide superior long-term fixation when compared with femoral components with a roughened surface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component with a polished surface finish and compare them with the results of total hip arthroplasty performed with a similar design of cemented femoral component with a rougher surface finish. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive group of 132 patients (149 hips) in whom primary total hip arthroplasty had been performed by one surgeon using a cemented collared femoral component with a polished (0.1-microm Ra) surface finish and a cementless acetabular component. Ninety-eight patients (115 hips) were followed for a minimum of ten years. We compared the survivorship of this prosthesis with that of a femoral component of similar design but with rougher surfaces (matte or grit-blasted). RESULTS: No polished stems were revised because of aseptic loosening or demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening; however, eight hips (5.4%) with a polished stem demonstrated osteolysis distal to the greater or lesser tro-chanter. In contrast, six stems (2.0%) with a matte surface finish of 0.8-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional five stems were seen to be loose radiographically. Eleven stems (9.2%) with a grit-blasted surface finish of 2.1-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional four stems were seen to be loose radiographically. The difference in the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.1-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface was significant (p = 0.001), as was the difference between the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.8-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface (p = 0.001). No cups were revised because of aseptic loosening, and one hip had radiographic signs of acetabular loosening. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated excellent durability of a prosthesis consisting of a cemented, collared, polished femoral component and a cementless acetabular component. While no hips were revised because of aseptic loosening, distal femoral osteolysis was observed in eight hips (5.4%), a higher prevalence than has been reported by others after similar durations of follow-up of tapered, collarless, polished femoral components.     

Nineteen Year Results of THA Using Modular 9 mm S-ROM Femoral Component in Patients With Small Femoral Canals

A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 30 consecutive THA performed in 25 patients with hypoplastic proximal femurs, who had received a 9-mm uncemented modular S-ROM stem. The mean patient age was 42 years (17–69 years), mean height was 152.5cm (130–170.5 cm), mean weight was 63 kg (39–90 kg), and mean follow-up period was 19 years (range, 12–23 years). Subsidence was seen in 2 hips, with asymptomatic femoral osteolysis present in 11 hips; overall survival of the femoral stem was 93.3%, with two revisions of the femoral component required for aseptic loosening. After a mean follow-up of 19 years, the use of the S-ROM 9 mm femoral stem in the patient with the small femur was associated with a low revision rate due to aseptic loosening of the stem.     

Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first consecutive 154 implantations of a cementless, double-tapered straight femoral stem (cementless Spotorno (CLS), Sulzer Orthopedics) in 141 patients under the age of 55 (mean 47 (13-55)) years. After a mean follow-up of 12 (10-15) years, 11 patients (11 hips) had died and 7 (7 hips) could not be located. 5 patients (5 hips) underwent femoral revision—1 for infection, 1 for periprosthetic fracture and 3 for aseptic loosening of the stem. The overall survival rate of the stem was 97% at 12 years (95% confidence limits, 93%-100%), and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point 98 (95-100)%. The survival rate of the acetabular components was 78 (71-85) % after 12 years. The median Harris hip score at follow-up was 84 points. None of the patients had thigh pain. Radiolucent lines in Gruen regions 1 and 7 were present in 21 hips (17%). 2 hips had radiolucent lines in regions 2-6 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. No femoral osteolysis was detected.

The mid- to long-term survival with this type of femoral component is excellent and compares favorably with cemented stems in this age group. However, the high rate of cup loosening and the low Harris hip scores are a concern in this subgroup of young patients.     

Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the acetabular component is the major long-term problem associated with total hip arthroplasty with cement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the minimum thirteen-year results associated with cementless acetabular components that had been inserted by a single surgeon and to compare them with the results associated with cemented acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive, nonselected primary total hip replacements were performed in 108 patients with use of a Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component with a 28-mm head. The patients were evaluated clinically with use of a standard terminology questionnaire, and they were evaluated radiographically for loosening, component migration, wear, and osteolysis. The rates of revision for aseptic loosening and radiographic evidence of loosening for this cohort were compared with the rates for four previously reviewed consecutive series of hips in which the acetabular component had been inserted with cement. All patients were managed by the same surgeon, were followed for thirteen to fifteen years, and were evaluated with use of the same two criteria (revision and loosening) as the end points for Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (seventy-two hips) were living and forty-two patients (forty-eight hips) had died after thirteen to fifteen years of follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised because of aseptic loosening, and no acetabular component had migrated. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 81% +/- 8% at fifteen years. With revision of the acetabular component for clinical failure (osteolysis, wear, loosening, or dislocation) as the end point, the survival rate was 94% +/- 8% at fifteen years. Among the seventy hips with at least thirteen years of radiographic follow-up, five had pelvic osteolysis and three had had revision of a well-fixed acetabular component because of pelvic osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear. The mean linear wear rate was 0.15 mm/yr (0.12 mm/yr when one outlier was excluded). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of fixation, Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular components performed better than did cemented 22-mm-inner-diameter Charnley acetabular components as well as 28-mm-inner-diameter all-polyethylene and metal-backed acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. However, the rate of wear was greater in association with the Harris-Galante-I cementless components than it was in association with the Charnley cemented all-polyethylene components.