Efficacy of nebulized flunisolide combined with salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in stable patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of nebulized corticosteroids in the prevention of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized flunisolide (1 mg) + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide (1,875/375 microg) b.i.d. in comparison with placebo + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study on 114 patients with COPD of moderate-to-severe degree. The main outcome was the frequency of severe exacerbations over a 6-month period. Before and after treatment, respiratory symptoms, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), shuttle walking test distance and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of exacerbations was slightly lower in the flunisolide group compared to the placebo group (19 vs. 34, p = 0.054); the number of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation during the study was also decreased (16 vs. 26, p = 0.059). In particular, type 3 Anthonisens's exacerbations were significantly reduced by flunisolide (p = 0.044). In the placebo group, scores were higher than in the flunisolide group but nonsignificant for dyspnea, cough, sputum amount and purulence. FEV(1) was significantly increased compared to baseline in both groups, and the area under the FEV(1)-time curve during the 6-month period was significantly greater in the flunisolide group (5.2 +/- 10.6 vs. 2.1 +/- 5.0, flunisolide vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.047). For shuttle walking test distance and scores of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, no significant difference between the baseline evaluation and the end of the study was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized flunisolide is a good alternative to other inhaled corticosteroids when added to nebulized salbutamol/ipratropium bromide in the long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD patients.     

Airway bacterial concentrations and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE: Increased bacterial concentration (load) in the lower airways and new bacterial strain acquisition have been posited as mechanisms for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Bacterial concentrations are higher during exacerbation than during stable disease; however, these studies are cross sectional and devoid of strain typing. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the increased bacterial concentrations function as a separate mechanism for exacerbation induction independent of new strain acquisition. METHODS: In a prospective, longitudinal cohort of patients with COPD, the relationship between exacerbation occurrence, sputum bacterial concentrations, and new strain acquisition was examined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical information, quantitative sputum cultures, and molecular typing of potential bacterial pathogen isolates. Over 81 months, 104 subjects completed 3,009 clinic visits, 560 (19.6%) during exacerbations and 2,449 (80.4%) during stable disease. Among preexisting strains, sputum concentrations of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus haemolyticus were not different in exacerbation versus stable disease. Moraxella catarrhalis (stable, 10(8.38 +/- 0.13) [mean +/- SEM] vs. exacerbation, 10(7.78 +/- 0.26); p = 0.02) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (stable, 10(8.42 +/- 0.21) vs. exacerbation, 10(7.76 +/- 0.52); p = 0.07) concentrations were lower during exacerbations compared with stable periods. Concentrations of new strains of H. influenzae (stable, 10(7.28 +/- 0.15) vs. exacerbation, 10(7.76 +/- 0.17); p = 0.04) and M. catarrhalis (stable, 10(7.85 +/- 0.15) vs. exacerbation, 10(8.37 +/- 0.14); p = 0.02), were increased during exacerbations; however, the differences were small. CONCLUSIONS: Change in bacterial load is unlikely to be an important mechanism for exacerbations. Better understanding of the host-pathogen interaction, rather than enumerating bacteria in respiratory samples, is required to provide new insights into bacterial infection in COPD.     

Impact of COPD exacerbations on patient-centered outcomes

BACKGROUND: Frequent exacerbations are associated with a faster decline in FEV(1), impaired health status, and worse survival. Their impact and temporal relationship with other outcomes such as functional status, dyspnea, and the multidimensional body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea, exercise capacity (BODE) index remain unknown. HYPOTHESIS: We reasoned that exacerbations affect the BODE index and its components, and that changes in the BODE index could be used to monitor the effect of exacerbations on the host. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study in a Veterans Affairs medical center. METHODS: We studied 205 patients with COPD (mean [+/- SD] FEV(1), 43 +/- 15% predicted), and recorded the body mass index, FEV(1) percent predicted, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, 6-min walk distance, and the BODE index at baseline, during the exacerbation, and at 6, 12, and 24 months following the first episode, and documented all exacerbations for 2 years after the first acute exacerbation. RESULTS: From the cohort, 130 patients (63%) experienced 352 exacerbations or (0.85 exacerbations per patient per year); 48 patients (23%), experienced one episode, 82 patients (40%) experienced 2 or more exacerbations, and 50 patients required hospitalization. At study entry, exacerbators had a worse mean baseline BODE index score (4.2 +/- 2.1 vs 3.57 +/- 2.3, respectively; p < 0.03). The BODE index score worsened by 1.38 points during the exacerbation, and remained 0.8 and 1.1 points above baseline at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There was little change in BODE index score at 2 years in nonexacerbators. CONCLUSION: COPD exacerbations negatively impact on the BODE index and its components. The BODE index is a sensitive tool used to assess the impact of exacerbations and to monitor COPD disease progression.     

Safety of sputum induction during exacerbations of COPD

Sputum induction (SI) is considered to be a safe tool for assessing airway inflammation in stable patients with COPD, but little is known about its safety during exacerbations. We therefore assessed the safety of SI during COPD exacerbations. SI data from 44 COPD patients were assessed both in the stable phase and during exacerbation. The median FEV1 for the stable phase and exacerbation were 61% predicted (interquartile range [IQR], 49 to 74% predicted) and 51% predicted (IQR, 45 to 60% predicted), respectively. The median decrease in FEV(1) with SI during an exacerbation was 0.27 L (IQR, 0.17 to 0.40 L) vs 0.28 L (IQR, 0.22 to 0.44 L) during the stable phase (p = 0.03). The patients experienced the associated dyspnea well; no other adverse events occurred. All FEV1 values returned to within 90% of their initial value within 30 min. A larger decrease in FEV1 due to SI during an exacerbation was associated with the following parameters in the stable phase of disease: lower total sputum cell count (r = -0.37; p = 0.01); higher percentage of eosinophils (r = 0.33; p = 0.04); and a larger decrease in FEV1 after SI (r = 0.39; p = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis, the only independent association was with the larger decrease in FEV1 in the stable phase. We concluded that SI can be safely carried out in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD who experience an exacerbation, and this occurs with no greater risk than in stable patients with COPD.     

Effect of interactions between lower airway bacterial and rhinoviral infection in exacerbations of COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The inflammatory responses and associated clinical severity of COPD exacerbations are greatly variable, and the determinants of these factors are poorly understood. We examined the hypothesis that bacteria and viruses may modulate this heterogeneity and that interactions between bacterial and viral infection may affect changes in airway bacterial load and the clinical features and inflammatory responses of exacerbations in patients with COPD. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient Department, London Chest Hospital, London, UK. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients with COPD. MEASUREMENTS: We prospectively studied 56 COPD exacerbations, obtaining clinical data and paired sputum and serum samples at baseline and exacerbation. Qualitative and quantitative microbiology, polymerase chain reaction detection for rhinovirus, and estimation of cytokine levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were performed. RESULTS: A total of 69.6% of exacerbations were associated with a bacterial pathogen, most commonly Haemophilus influenzae. Rhinovirus was identified in 19.6% of exacerbations. The rise in bacterial load at exacerbation correlated with the rise in sputum interleukin (IL)-8 (r = 0.37, p = 0.022) and fall in FEV1 (r = 0.35, p = 0.048). Exacerbations with both rhinovirus and H. influenzae had higher bacterial loads (10(8.56) cfu/mL vs 10(8.05)cfu/mL, p = 0.018) and serum IL-6 (13.75 pg/mL vs 6.29 pg/mL, p = 0.028) than exacerbations without both pathogens. In exacerbations with both cold symptoms (a marker of putative viral infection) and a bacterial pathogen, the FEV1 fall was greater (20.3% vs 3.6%, p = 0.026) and symptom count was higher (p = 0.019) than those with a bacterial pathogen alone. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical severity and inflammatory responses in COPD exacerbations are modulated by the nature of the infecting organism: bacterial and viral pathogens interact to cause additional rises in inflammatory markers and greater exacerbation severity.     

Factors associated with increased risk of exacerbation and hospital admission in a cohort of ambulatory COPD patients: a multiple logistic regression analysis. The EOLO Study Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate two models to estimate the probabilities of frequent exacerbations (more than 1 per year) and admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that can be used in a primary care setting. METHODS: Information was obtained in a cross-sectional observational study on ambulatory COPD patients performed in 201 general practices located throughout Spain. The model for admissions included 713 cases, 499 for the developmental sample and 214 in the validation sample; the model for frequent exacerbations included 896 patients, 627 in the developmental sample and 269 in the validation model. Candidate variables to be included in both models were: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), FEV(1) as percent predicted [FEV(1 )(% pred.)], active smoking, chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH) and significant comorbidity. RESULTS: The admission model contained 2 readily obtainable variables: comorbidity (OR = 1.97; CI 95% = 1. 24-3.14) and FEV(1)(% pred.) (OR = 0.72; 0.58-0.88, for every 10 units), and well calibrated in developmental and validation samples (goodness-of-fit tests: p = 0.989 and p = 0.720, respectively). The model for frequent exacerbations included 3 variables: age (OR = 1. 21; 1.01-1.44; for every 10 years of increasing age), FEV(1 )(% pred. ) (OR = 0.82; 0.70-0.96, for every 10 units) and CMH (OR = 1.54; 1. 11-2.14) and also well calibrated (p = 0.411 and p = 0.340 in the developmental and validation samples, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that FEV(1) impairment explains part of the risk of frequent exacerbations and hospital admissions. Furthermore, CMH and increasing age are significantly associated with the risk of frequent exacerbations, but severity of exacerbations provoking hospital admissions is associated with the presence of significant comorbidity. These important and easily measurable variables contain valuable information for optimal management of ambulatory patients with COPD.     

Role of spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide to predict exacerbations in treated asthmatics

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complementary roles of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and spirometry to predict asthma exacerbations requiring one or more tapering courses of systemic corticosteroids. METHODS: We prospectively studied 44 nonsmoking asthmatics (24 women) aged 51 +/- 21 years (mean +/- SD) who were clinically stable for 6 weeks and receiving 250 mug of fluticasone/50 mug of salmeterol or equivalent for 3 years. Total exhaled NO (FENO), small airway/alveolar NO (CANO), large airway NO flux (J'awNO), and spirometry were measured. RESULTS: Baseline FEV(1) was 2.1 +/- 0.7 L, 70 +/- 20% of predicted after 180 mug of albuterol. Twenty-two of 44 asthmatics had one or more exacerbations over 18 months, 16 of 22 asthmatics had two exacerbations, and 6 of 22 asthmatics were hospitalized, including 1 asthmatic with near-fatal asthma. When baseline FEV(1) was 76% of predicted, exacerbations occurred only in 2 of 13 asthmatics (15%) [p = 0.003, chi(2)]. Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for first exacerbation, the area under the curve was 0.67 with cutoff FEV(1) of 76% of predicted (sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.50; positive predictive value, 0.65; negative predictive value, 0.85; positive likelihood ratio [LR(+)], 1.8; negative likelihood ratio [LR(-)], 0.18). When baseline FENO was >/= 28 parts per billion (ppb), exacerbations occurred in 13 of 17 asthmatics (76%); if baseline FENO was < 28 ppb, exacerbations occurred in only 9 of 27 asthmatics (33%) [p = 0.005, chi(2)]. Using the ROC curve for first exacerbation, the area under the curve was 0.71 with FENO cutoff point of 28 ppb (sensitivity, 0.59; specificity, 0.82; positive predictive value, 0.77; negative predictive value, 0.87; LR(+), 3.3; LR(-), 0.5). Independent of baseline FEV(1), FENO >/= 28 ppb increased the relative risk (RR) for exacerbation by 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 9.1; Mantel-Haenszel, p = 0.007). An abnormal increase in CANO increased RR by 3.0 (95% CI, 0.9 to 9.9; p = 0.04), and abnormal J'awNO increased RR by 2.4 (95% CI, 1.0 to 5.6; p = 0.04). Independent of baseline FENO, FEV(1) /= 28 ppb and FEV(1) 76% of predicted had a 0% probability of exacerbation. CONCLUSION: Combining FENO and FEV(1) percentage of predicted can stratify risk for asthma exacerbation.     

Infections and airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severe exacerbations

RATIONALE: Severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are major causes of health care costs mostly related to hospitalization. The role of infections in COPD exacerbations is controversial. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization are associated with viral and/or bacterial infection and evaluated relationships among infection, exacerbation severity, assessed by reduction of FEV1, and specific patterns of airway inflammation. METHODS: We examined 64 patients with COPD when hospitalized for exacerbations, and when in stable convalescence. We measured lung function, blood gases, and exhaled nitric oxide, and examined sputum for inflammation and for viral and bacterial infection. RESULTS: Exacerbations were associated with impaired lung function (p < 0.01) and increased sputum neutrophilia (p < 0.001). Viral and/or bacterial infection was detected in 78% of exacerbations: viruses in 48.4% (6.2% when stable, p < 0.001) and bacteria in 54.7% (37.5% when stable, p = 0.08). Patients with infectious exacerbations (29.7% bacterial, 23.4% viral, 25% viral/bacterial coinfection) had longer hospitalizations (p < 0.02) and greater impairment of several measures of lung function (all p < 0.05) than those with noninfectious exacerbations. Patients with exacerbations with coinfection had more marked lung function impairment (p < 0.02) and longer hospitalizations (p = 0.001). Sputum neutrophils were increased in all exacerbations (p < 0.001) and were related to their severity (p < 0.001), independently of the association with viral or bacterial infections; sputum eosinophils were increased during (p < 0.001) virus-associated exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory infections are associated with the majority of COPD exacerbations and their severity, especially those with viral/bacterial coinfection. Airway neutrophilia is related to exacerbation severity regardless of viral and/or bacterial infections. Eosinophilia is a good predictor of viral exacerbations.     

Copeptin, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin as prognostic biomarkers in acute exacerbation of COPD

BACKGROUND: A novel approach to estimate the severity of COPD exacerbation and predict its outcome is the use of biomarkers. We assessed circulating levels of copeptin, the precursor of vasopressin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin as potential prognostic parameters for in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) requiring hospitalization. METHODS: Data of 167 patients (mean age, 70 years; mean FEV(1), 39.9 +/- 16.9 of predicted [+/- SD]) presenting to the emergency department due to AECOPD were analyzed. Patients were evaluated based on clinical, laboratory, and lung function parameters on hospital admission, at 14 days, and at 6 months. RESULTS: Plasma levels of all three biomarkers were elevated during the acute exacerbation (p < 0.001), but levels at 14 days and 6 months were similar (p = not significant). CRP was significantly higher in patients presenting with Anthonisen type I exacerbation (p = 0.003). In contrast to CRP and procalcitonin, copeptin on hospital admission was associated with a prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.002) and long-term clinical failure (p < 0.0001). Only copeptin was predictive for long-term clinical failure independent of age, comorbidity, hypoxemia, and lung functional impairment in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005). The combination of copeptin and previous hospitalization for COPD increased the risk of poor outcome (p < 0.0001). Long-term clinical failure was observed in 11% of cases with copeptin < 40 pmol/L and no history of hospitalization, as compared to 73% of patients with copeptin >/= 40 pmol/L and a history of hospitalization (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest copeptin as a prognostic marker for short-term and long-term prognoses in patients with AECOPD requiring hospitalization.     

Antibiotics are associated with lower relapse rates in outpatients with acute exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND: COPD is a complex disease with exacerbations characterized by worsening of symptoms resulting in deteriorating lung function. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess predictive factors of relapse for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECB). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of visits for AECB. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: Three hundred sixty-two visits (173 patients) with documented COPD treated as outpatients for AECB. MEASUREMENTS: Severity of underlying COPD, severity of AECB, comorbid conditions, therapy, and relapse rates (return visit within 14 days with persistent or worsening symptoms). RESULTS: Each visit was analyzed individually (referred to as a patient-visit). One group received antibiotics (270 patient-visits), and the second group (92 patient-visits) did not. Both groups had similar demographics and severity of underlying COPD. The overall relapse rate was 22%. The majority of patient-visits (95%) with severe symptoms at presentation were prescribed antibiotics vs only 40% of those with mild symptoms. Twenty-nine of 92 patient-visits (32%) were followed by relapse in the group that was not given antibiotics, whereas only 50 of 270 (19%) treated with antibiotics relapsed (p < 0.001). Those treated with amoxicillin had an even higher relapse rate (20 of 37 patient-visits, or 54%) than those who did not receive antibiotics (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Relapse from AECB was not related to the severity of underlying disease or to the severity of the acute exacerbation. Patients treated with antibiotics had significantly lower relapse rates than those who did not receive antibiotics. However, the specific choice of antibiotic is important because those treated with amoxicillin had the highest relapse rates of all groups.     

Metabolic alkalosis contributes to acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adult cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND: and study objectives: Patients with end-stage cystic fibrosis (CF) develop respiratory failure and hypercapnia. In contrast to COPD patients, altered electrolyte transport and malnutrition in CF patients may predispose them to metabolic alkalosis and, therefore, may contribute to hypercapnia. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of metabolic alkalosis in adults with hypercapnic respiratory failure in the setting of acute exacerbations of CF compared with COPD. DESIGN: Levels of arterial blood gases, plasma electrolytes, and serum albumin from 14 consecutive hypercapnic CF patients who had been admitted to the hospital with a respiratory exacerbation were compared with 49 consecutive hypercapnic patients with exacerbations of COPD. Hypercapnia was defined as a PaCO(2) of > or = 45 mm Hg. RESULTS: Despite similar PaCO(2) values, patients in the CF group were significantly more alkalotic than were those in the COPD group (mean [+/- SD] pH, 7.43 +/- 0.03 vs 7.37 +/- 0.05, respectively; p < 0.01). A mixed respiratory acidosis and metabolic alkalosis was evident in 71% of CF patients and 22% of COPD patients (p < 0.01). The mean concentrations of plasma chloride (95.1 +/- 4.9 vs 99.8 +/- 5.2 mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.01) and sodium (136.5 +/- 2.8 vs 140.4 +/- 4.5 mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.01) were significantly lower in the CF group, and the levels of serum albumin were significantly reduced (27.4 +/- 5.8 vs 33.7 +/- 4.8 mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Metabolic alkalosis contributes to hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults with acute exacerbations of CF. This acid-base disturbance occurs in conjunction with reduced total body salt levels and hypoalbuminemia.     

Risk indexes for exacerbations and hospitalizations due to COPD

OBJECTIVE: The ability to predict exacerbations in patients with COPD might permit more rational use of preventive interventions. Our objective was to develop risk indexes for exacerbations and hospitalizations due to exacerbations that might be applied to the individual patient. METHODS: Spirometry, demographics, and medical history were obtained at baseline in 1,829 patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD who entered a trial of inhaled tiotropium. Information about exacerbations and hospitalizations due to exacerbation was collected during the 6-month follow-up period. Analyses of first outcomes were modeled using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions. RESULTS: During follow-up, 551 patients had at least one exacerbation and 151 patients had at least one hospitalization due to exacerbation. In the multivariable model for exacerbation, older age, percentage of predicted FEV(1), duration of COPD, a productive cough, antibiotic or systemic corticosteroid use for COPD in the prior year, hospitalization for COPD in the prior year, and theophylline use at baseline predicted a higher risk. In the multivariable model for hospitalization, older age, percentage of predicted FEV(1), unscheduled clinic/emergency department visits for COPD in the prior year, any cardiovascular comorbidity, and prednisone use at baseline were associated with greater risk. Both the exacerbation and the hospitalization models provided moderately good discrimination, the validated concordance indexes being 0.66 and 0.73, respectively. Methods for calculating risk in individual patients are provided. CONCLUSIONS: Spirometry along with a few questions directed to the patient are strongly predictive of exacerbations and related hospitalizations over the ensuing 6 months.     

Effect of 1-year treatment with roflumilast in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE: The oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, roflumilast, can improve lung function in moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether treatment is effective in more severe COPD (GOLD [Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease] stages III and IV) over a longer period is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether roflumilast improves lung function and decreases exacerbation frequency over 1 year in patients with stable COPD. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial for 1 year. We recruited 1,513 patients (mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 41% predicted), 760 receiving oral 500 microg roflumilast and 753 receiving placebo once daily. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We recorded post-bronchodilator FEV1, exacerbation rate, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score at the study end point, and number and type of reported adverse events during treatment. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 increased by 39 ml with roflumilast compared with placebo by 52 weeks (p=0.001). The mean exacerbation rate was low and comparable in both treatment groups (0.86 vs. 0.92 exacerbations/patient/yr for roflumilast and placebo, respectively). In a retrospective analysis, the exacerbation rate in patients in GOLD stage IV disease was 36% lower in patients treated with roflumilast than in those treated with placebo (1.01 vs. 1.59 exacerbations/patient/year, respectively; p=0.024). The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score did not differ between treatments. The commonest adverse events related to roflumilast treatment were diarrhea, nausea, and headache, which usually subsided during continued treatment. However, roflumilast resulted in more withdrawals within the first 3 to 4 weeks of administration. CONCLUSIONS: In severe, stable COPD, PDE4 inhibition with roflumilast produced a modest but significant improvement in lung function without changing the exacerbation rate or health status. However, patients with very severe disease experienced fewer exacerbations with roflumilast.     

Open-label, randomized comparison trial of long-term outcomes of levofloxacin versus standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether treating acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) with levofloxacin modifies the long-term outcome of COPD patients in comparison with standard antibiotic regimens. METHODS: A 6-month open-label clinical trial of AE-COPD patients compared the outcomes of treating with levofloxacin versus standard therapy (clarithromycin, cefuroxime, or amoxicillin/clavulanate) at recommended doses for 10 days. Several variables were analysed: pulse oximetry, FEV1, health-related quality of life, infection-free interval, number of exacerbations, hospitalizations due to an exacerbation and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients initially enrolled, completion or withdrawal information was available for 50 patients in the levofloxacin arm and 52 in the standard therapy arm. At the end of the study, there were no differences in mortality (17.8% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.53), number of exacerbations (33 vs. 41, P = 0.40), pulse oximetry (median 91.71% vs. 92.46%, P = 0.18), FEV1 (median 51.31% vs. 47.14%, P = 0.30), health-related quality of life (median 8.63 vs. 10.75, P = 0.94) and infection-free interval (median 112 vs. 101 days, P = 0.72), for the levofloxacin and standard therapy, respectively. However, 12 out of 33 (33.6%) exacerbations treated with levofloxacin required in-hospital management versus 27 out of 41 (65.8%) treated with standard therapy (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that 10-day treatment of AE-COPD with levofloxacin is associated with a reduction in hospitalizations compared with standard antibiotics despite there being no significant benefit in other outcome variables.     

Exacerbations of COPD and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and COPD exacerbations.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic search of various electronic databases for articles published up through December of 2012. Studies considered eligible for inclusion were those dealing with COPD, COPD exacerbations, and GER; comparing at least two groups (COPD vs. controls or GER vs. controls); and describing relative risks (RRs) and prevalence ratios-or ORs and their respective 95% CIs (or presenting enough data to allow further calculations) for the association between GER and COPD-as well as exacerbation rates. Using a standardized form, we extracted data related to the study design; criteria for GER diagnosis; age, gender, and number of participants; randomization method; severity scores; methods of evaluating GER symptoms; criteria for defining exacerbations; exacerbation rates (hospitalizations, ER visits, unscheduled clinic visits, prednisone use, and antibiotic use); GER symptoms in COPD group vs. controls; mean number of COPD exacerbations (with symptoms vs. without symptoms); annual frequency of exacerbations; GER treatment; and severity of airflow obstruction.

RESULTS:

Overall, GER was clearly identified as a risk factor for COPD exacerbations (RR = 7.57; 95% CI: 3.84-14.94), with an increased mean number of exacerbations per year (mean difference: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.22-1.36). The prevalence of GER was significantly higher in patients with COPD than in those without (RR = 13.06; 95% CI: 3.64-46.87; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

GER is a risk factor for COPD exacerbations. The role of GER in COPD management should be studied in greater detail.     

Systemic cytokines, clinical and physiological changes in patients hospitalized for exacerbation of COPD

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation in patients with COPD may worsen during exacerbations, but there is limited information relating levels of systemic inflammatory markers with symptoms and physiologic changes during an exacerbation METHODS: We measured dyspnea using the visual analog scale, pulmonary function tests, hemograms, and plasma levels for interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, leukotriene B(4) (LTB4), tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in 20 patients on admission to a hospital for exacerbation of COPD (ECOPD), 48 h later (interim), and 8 weeks after hospital discharge (recovery). RESULTS: Dyspnea was present in all patients. Inspiratory capacity improved faster than FEV(1). Compared to recovery, there was a significant increase in the mean (+/- SD) hospital admission plasma levels of IL-6 (6.38 +/- 0.72 to 2.80 +/- 0.79 pg/mL; p = 0.0001), IL-8 (8.18 +/- 0.85 to 3.72 +/- 0.85 pg/mL; p = 0.002), and LTB4 (8,675 +/- 1,652 to 2,534 +/- 1,813 pg/mL; p = 0.003), and the percentages of segmented neutrophils (79 to 69%; p < 0.02) and band forms (7.3 to 1.0%; p < 0.01) in peripheral blood, with no changes in TNF-alpha and SLPI. There were significant correlations between changes in IL-6 (r = 0.61; p = 0.01) and IL-8 (r = 0.56; p = 0.04) with changes in dyspnea and levels of IL-6 (r = -0.51; p = 0.04) and TNF-alpha (r = -0.71; p < 0.02) with changes in FEV(1.) CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with ECOPDs experience significant changes in systemic cytokine levels that correlate with symptoms and lung function. An ECOPD represents not only a worsening of airflow obstruction but also increased systemic demand in a host with limited ventilatory reserve.     

Systemic inflammation and systemic oxidative stress in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the inflammatory processes and oxidative stress are closely linked in the lung compartment. However, the relationships between systemic inflammation and parameters of oxidative stress in the systemic circulation during acute exacerbations of COPD remain to be explored. OBJECTIVE: To analyze relationships between erythrocytic glutathione peroxidase (GPx), a marker of systemic oxidative stress, and parameters reflecting systemic inflammation, such as circulating neutrophils, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin (IL)-6, in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured erythrocytic GPx activity, circulating neutrophil count, and serum high-sensitivity (hs) CRP and IL-6 in 177 patients admitted to the hospital due to an acute exacerbation of COPD (91 males, mean age 66.8+/-0.9 years, mean FEV1 45.3+/-1.3% predicted). RESULTS: From GOLD Stage II to Stage III and IV, erythrocytic GPx activity significantly decreased [mean+/-SEM: from 44.3+/-1.7 U/g Hb to 40.8+/-1.1 U/g Hb and to 38.4+/-1.5 U/g Hb, p = 0.037], while serum hsCRP increased [median (25th, 75th percentile): from 9.6 (3.0, 23.0) mg/l to 23.3 (6.4, 46.8) mg/l, and to 26.7 (6.5, 117.2) mg/l, p = 0.004]. Erythrocytic GPx activity was significantly inversely related to both, log neutrophil count (r = -0.219, p = 0.003) and log hsCRP (r = -0.199, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests an association between systemic inflammation and systemic oxidative stress reflected by erythrocytic GPx in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.     

Effect of twelve-months therapy with oral ambroxol in preventing exacerbations in patients with COPD. Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled study (the AMETHIST Trial)

The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter parallel-group study was to evaluate the effect of long-term ambroxol treatment in preventing exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Two hundred and forty-two outpatients with COPD defined by ATS criteria with value of FEV1 between > or =60 and 80% of predicted and history of one or more exacerbations in the previous year were recruited by 26 Respiratory Medicine Centers in Italy and treated for 1 year with one ambroxol retard capsule of 75 mg twice daily or placebo. The percentage of patients free from exacerbation at 6 months was 63% with ambroxol and 60% with placebo (p=0.366) and at 12 months 56% with ambroxol and 53% with placebo (p=0.363). In a subset of 45 patients with more severe baseline symptoms, ambroxol therapy was associated with a significant higher percentage of patients free from exacerbation compared to placebo: 63 vs. 38% (p=0.038). In conclusion, we did not find a significant difference between long-term ambroxol therapy and placebo, in preventing exacerbations in patients with COPD. In patients with more severe respiratory symptoms at baseline, however, we observed a significant difference in the cumulative exacerbation-free persistence between ambroxol and placebo, suggesting that long-term muco-regulatory therapy with ambroxol could be useful in highly symptomatic patients with COPD.     

A randomized controlled trial to assess the optimal dose and effect of nebulized albuterol in acute exacerbations of COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Despite the widespread use of short-acting, inhaled beta(2)-agonists in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs), little is known about their optimal dose. The aims of this study are to compare the bronchodilator response to incremental doses of inhaled albuterol during and after recovery from an AECOPD, and to compare the effects of regular nebulized albuterol, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, on the speed of recovery. METHODS: Eighty-six patients admitted with an AECOPD were recruited. Each patient was administered incremental doses of inhaled albuterol on hospital admission and following recovery. Dose-response curves were constructed based on FEV(1) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) recorded after each incremental dose. Patients were then randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol q4h until recovery. Twice-daily PEFR, the number of extra doses of bronchodilators, and side effects reported were recorded. RESULTS: Maximal bronchodilation (Emax) FEV(1) (maximal bronchodilatory response to albuterol) increased from 0.64 +/- 0.27 L/min during the exacerbation to 0.94 +/- 0.38 L/min during recovery (p < 0.001). The Emax PEFR increased from 147.53 +/- 62.46 L/min to 222.94 +/- 73.82 L/min after recovery (p = < 0.001). There was no significant difference in rate of recovery of PEFR (p = 0.684), duration of hospital stay (p = 0.084), or side effects (p = 0.506) between the groups receiving 2.5 mg or 5 mg of nebulized albuterol. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant improvement in Emax to inhaled albuterol as the COPD exacerbation resolved. There was no significant difference in outcomes including length of hospital stay or recovery of lung function between patients treated with regular 2.5 mg vs 5 mg of nebulized albuterol during an AECOPD.