Germline mutations of EXO1 gene in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and atypical HNPCC forms

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Germline mutations in one of four mismatch repair genes have been found in the majority of families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), but only in a small part of families with atypical HNPCC. The recently cloned EXO1 gene might be involved in the pathogenesis of HNPCC because the EXO1 protein strongly interacts with the MSH2 protein. To determine its role in HNPCC, EXO1 was scanned for germline mutations. METHODS: All 14 exons of EXO1 were scanned for mutations in index patients from 33 families with HNPCC fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria and in 225 index patients suspected of HNPCC. RESULTS: Germline variants of EXO1 were detected in 14 patients, including one splice-site mutation in a family with HNPCC and 13 missense mutations in patients with atypical HNPCC. These variants did not occur in more than 200 control individuals. From 13 of these 14 patients, tumors were available for analysis of microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity. Six of the tumors showed microsatellite instability. Heterozygosity analysis showed one case without EXO1 allelic loss and 12 tumors with loss of the mutant allele and retention of the normal one. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a possible association of germline EXO1 variants with HNPCC and atypical HNPCC.     

HNPCC syndrome (hereditary non polyposis colon cancer): identification and management

BACKGROUND: The hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) syndrome is an inherited condition defined by clinical and genealogical information, known as Amsterdam criteria. In about 70% of cases, HNPCC syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MMR genes, leading to microsatellite instability of tumor DNA (MSI phenotype). Patients affected by the disease are at high risk for colorectal and endometrial carcinomas, but also for other organs tumors. HNPCC syndrome is responsible for 5% of colorectal cancers. MAJOR ASPECTS: The lack of sensitivity of Amsterdam criteria in recognizing patients carrying a MMR germline mutation led to an enlargement of these criteria for the recruitment of possible HNPCC patients, and to a two-steps strategy, asking first for a tumor characterization according to MSI phenotype, especially in case of early-onset sporadic cases. FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS: The identification of germline MMR mutations has no major consequence on the cancer treatments, but influences markedly the long-term follow-up and the management of at-risk relatives. Gene carriers will enter a follow-up program regarding their colorectal and endometrial cancer risks; other organs being at low lifetime risk, no specific surveillance will be proposed.     

The colon cancer burden of genetically defined hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Estimates of the frequency of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) based on clinical criteria have varied widely. Recent studies of germline mismatch repair gene mutations have suggested that HNPCC accounts for close to 3% of all colon cancer, but this estimate may have been inflated by inclusion of founder effects peculiar to Finland. We therefore determined by genetic criteria the colon cancer burden associated with HNPCC in a population-based study of 1066 individuals from Utah and California. METHODS: The coding regions of mismatch repair genes hMSH2 and hMLH1 were sequenced from the germline of those individuals whose tumors exhibited microsatellite instability. RESULTS: Microsatellite instability was present in 16% (171/1066) of tumors. Pathogenic germline mismatch repair gene mutations were identified in 7 individuals, and missense amino acid changes of uncertain significance were identified in another 6 individuals. After adjusting for the availability of sufficient germline DNA for sequencing, the 7 clearly pathogenic mutations accounted for 0.86% of colon cancer at the population level. Individuals with these mutations were significantly younger, more likely to have a family history of colon and endometrial cancer, and more likely to have first-degree relatives with a young-age onset of colon cancer than individuals with unstable tumors but without germline mutations (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that genetically defined HNPCC accounts for a very small percentage of colon cancer at the population level, a percentage less than that estimated by most previous clinical studies.     

Efficient detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene carriers by screening for tumor microsatellite instability before germline genetic testing

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The optimal strategy for the detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) gene carriers remains uncertain. We evaluated whether microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis or MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining of tumors will screen individuals efficiently for germline MSH2 and MLH1 testing. METHODS: We performed a case-series study of 114 eligible families enrolled in our high-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) registry. Medical history data were collected on probands and relatives. MSI analysis was performed on proband tumors, and MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining was assessed. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis was used to identify germline MSH2 or MLH1 mutations in probands found to have tumors with high-frequency MSI. RESULTS: Tumor tissue and adequate clinical data were available in 109 of the 114 families. Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines were met by 23% and 70% of the families, respectively. High-frequency MSI was identified in the proband tumors in 47 of the 109 families (43%). Germline MSH2 and MLH1 gene testing was carried out in the probands of 32 of 47 families with MSI-H tumors. Mutations were detected in 16 families (9 in MSH2 and 7 in MLH1) and sequence variants of uncertain significance in 5 families (1 in MSH2 and 4 in MLH1). Germline mutations or sequence variants of uncertain significance were detected in 15 of 19 (79%) of our Amsterdam families and in 6 of 13 (46%) of our non-Amsterdam families with MSI-H tumors. MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining was assessed in 38 of the 47 MSI-H tumors. Unequivocal loss of hMLH1 expression was found in 20 tumors and loss of MSH2 expression in 9 tumors. Corresponding loss of protein expression was seen in 17 of 18 (94%) of tumors from probands with germline mutations or variants. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of high-frequency MSI or the loss of MSH2 or MLH1 immunostaining in CRCs are both useful criteria for selecting high-risk patients who should be tested for germline mutations in MSH2 or MLH1.     

Rapid diagnostic test for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer kindred using polymerase chain reaction

PURPOSE: We have identified a mutation in thehMLH1 gene from the proband of a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer kindred. We wished to develop a rapid test for this specific mutation to facilitate screening of other family members. METHOD: An allele-specific polymerase chain reaction strategy was used to detect a T insertion at the +3 splice site post exon 9 in thehMLH1 gene. The test was evaluated on DNA in which the mutation status was known. RESULTS: A 130-base pair fragment was reliably amplified using the allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. The test is able to identify the mutant allele and to distinguish between normal, carriers (heterozygous), and tumor DNA samples. The mutant allele is not present in an unrelated hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer cell line or in a sample of the normal population (n=49). CONCLUSIONS: This is a simple, rapid test that can determine carrier status in the members of a kindred at risk for this mutation. This mutation is unlikely to be a polymorphism. This test may now be evaluated in a clinical setting.Ian Faragher is in receipt of a National Health and Medical Research Council medical postgraduate scholarship, Canberra, Australia.     

Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing to refine cancer risk is available. However, little is known about factors affecting the uptake of testing for the most common hereditary colon cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. This study investigated attitudes, intentions, and uptake of genetic testing within newly identified families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. METHODS: Cohort study conducted at the National Institutes of Health between April 15, 1996, and November 20, 1999. Data were collected through questionnaires before semistructured education sessions, individual counseling sessions, and the offer of genetic testing. RESULTS: Of the 111 eligible first-degree relatives, 51% chose to participate in education and individual counseling sessions. Participation was associated with greater numbers of first-degree relatives with cancer; no association was found between participation and personal history of cancer. Before education and individual counseling sessions, 64% of participants had heard little about genetic testing for cancers; however, most (97%) stated intentions to pursue testing. Fifty-one percent identified learning about their children's risks as the most important reason to consider testing. Thirty-nine percent identified the potential effect on their health insurance as the most important reason to not undergo testing. Of the 111 eligible first-degree relatives, 51% chose to undergo genetic testing. Participants' intentions to pursue genetic testing were significantly affected by concerns regarding the ability to handle the emotional aspects of testing and the psychosocial effect on family members. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic counseling and testing offers the potential to focus cancer screening resources in individuals truly at increased risk, thereby reducing mortality and morbidity. Fears of discrimination and concerns about psychological and psychosocial issues may present barriers to the use of current cancer prevention strategies, including genetic counseling and testing.     

Clinical and genetic characteristics of Chinese hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families

AIM: To analyze the clinical characteristics of Chinese hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families and to screen the germline mutations of human mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 in the probands.METHODS: Thirty-one independent Chinese HNPCC families were collected in Zhejiang Province. All of them met Chinese HNPCC criteria. Clinical data about patient gender, site of colorectal cancer, age of onset, history of multiple colorectal cancer, associated extracolonic cancer were recorded. PCR and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) were employed to screen the mutations. Sequencing analysis was used to find out the exact mutation site and characteristics of the samples showing abnormal DHPLC profiles.RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six malignant neoplasms were found in 107 patients including 14 multiple cancers. One hundred and six of the 136 neoplasms (77.9%) were diagnosed as colorectal cancer, with an average age of onset at 48.57 ± 29.00 years. Gastric cancer was the most common extracolonic cancer (10.3%) in these families. Twenty-three different sequence variations in hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes were detected in these 17 families. Fifteen sequence variations were located in the exons, including 5 SNPs, 3 silent mutations, 3 missense mutations, 2 nonsense mutations and 2 frameshift mutations. The latter seven mutations seemed to be pathogenic.CONCLUSION: Germline mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes are identified in about one-third HNPCC kindreds fulfilling Chinese HNPCC criteria. Chinese HNPCC families have some particular clinical characteristics, such as a left-sided predominance, less synchronous or metachronous colorectal cancer, and frequent occurrence of gastric cancer.     

Heterozygous mutations in PMS2 cause hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (Lynch syndrome)

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The role of the mismatch repair gene PMS2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) is not fully clarified. To date, only 7 different heterozygous truncating PMS2 mutations have been reported in HNPCC-suspected families. Our aim was to further assess the role of PMS2 in HNPCC. METHODS: We performed Southern blot analysis in 112 patients from MLH1-, MSH2-, and MSH6-negative HNPCC-like families. A subgroup (n = 38) of these patients was analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). In a second study group consisting of 775 index patients with familial colorectal cancer, we performed immunohistochemistry using antibodies against MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 proteins. In 8 of 775 tumors, only loss of PMS2 expression was found. In these cases, we performed Southern blot analysis and DGGE. Segregation analysis was performed in the families with a (possibly) deleterious mutation. RESULTS: Seven novel mutations were identified: 4 genomic rearrangements and 3 truncating point mutations. Three of these 7 families fulfill the Amsterdam II criteria. The pattern of inheritance is autosomal dominant with a milder phenotype compared with families with pathogenic MLH1 or MSH2 mutations. Microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis performed in HNPCC-related tumors from proven carriers showed a microsatellite instability high phenotype and loss of PMS2 protein expression in all tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We show that heterozygous truncating mutations in PMS2 do play a role in a small subset of HNPCC-like families. PMS2 mutation analysis is indicated in patients diagnosed with a colorectal tumor with absent staining for the PMS2 protein.     

Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Identification of the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome enables prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) by means of colonoscopy and polypectomies. We evaluated the efficacy of screening in a controlled trial over 15 years. METHODS: Incidence of CRC and survival were compared in 2 cohorts of at-risk members of 22 families with HNPCC. Colonic screening at 3-year intervals was arranged for 133 subjects; 119 control subjects had no screening. Genetic testing was offered to subjects in whose families the causative mutation was known. RESULTS: CRC developed in 8 screened subjects (6%) compared with 19 control subjects (16 %; P = 0.014). The CRC rate was reduced by 62%. In mutation-positive subjects alone, the CRC rates were 18% in screened subjects and 41% in controls (P = 0.02). The decrease resulted from the removal of adenomas in 13 mutation-positive individuals (30%) and in 6 subjects with unknown mutation status (40%). All CRCs in the study group were local, causing no deaths, compared with 9 deaths caused by CRC in the controls. The overall death rates were 10 vs. 26 subjects in the study and control groups (P = 0.003), 4 vs. 12 in mutation-positive subjects (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic screening at 3-year intervals more than halves the risk of CRC, prevents CRC deaths, and decreases overall mortality by about 65% in HNPCC families.     

Regional proliferative patterns in the colon of patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Patients from a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) kindred (Lynch Type 1 and Type 2) have an increased risk of developing large-bowel cancer. Tumors occur at a young age and are characteristically right-sided. Colonic mucosal proliferation is known to be increased in several groups of patients at risk of colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the pattern of mucosal proliferation at different sites in the colon of patients at risk of HNPCC and to determine whether this pattern differs from normal patients. METHODS: Mucosal biopsies were obtained at colonoscopy from 21 patients at risk for HNPCC (16 females; mean age, 42 years) and from 7 normal patients (4 females; mean age, 38 years), and mucosal proliferation was quantified using the whole crypt mitotic count (WCMC) technique. RESULTS: In patients from HNPCC families, WCMC and crypt area were significantly greater in the cecum than in the transverse colon and left colon (P < 0.001). Compared with normal patients, WCMC in HNPCC patients was significantly greater in the cecum only (P < 0.05). A significant right-to-left shift was also observed in normal patients, but the percentage increase from right to left was two-fold greater in HNPCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm a proximalto-distal proliferative gradient in the human colon and suggest that this may be exaggerated in HNPCC. This increased proximal proliferative rate may be a factor in the development of right-sided cancer in these patients.Supported by the Joint Research Board, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.Presented in part at the meeting of The American Gastroenterological Association, Boston, Massachusetts, May 16 to 19, 1993.     

Genetic polymorphisms in carcinogen metabolism and their association to hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer

Background & Aims: The phenotype of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer shows interfamilial and intrafamilial variation even in the presence of identical predisposing mutations, suggesting the existence of additional phenotype determinants. The modifying role of genetic polymorphisms in loci involved in carcinogen metabolism was studied. Methods: We focused on colon cancers from kindreds sharing one of two predisposing mutations (mutation 1 or 2) in the mismatch repair gene MLH1 (78 and 14 tumors, respectively). Polymorphisms in N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 and GSTT1 were investigated. Results: The NAT1 allele 10 was associated with lower median age at diagnosis in both groups. In mutation 1 group, the NAT1 allele 10 was a risk factor for distal tumor location, both alone (P = 0.028) and combined with the GSTT1-positive genotype (P = 0.008). On the other hand, the combined null genotype of GSTM1 and GSTT1 was associated with proximal tumors. Associations with tumor location were not observed in patients with mutation 2, probably reflecting a small sample size. Conclusions: The results suggest that genetic polymorphisms in carcinogen metabolism modify the age of onset and tumor location in individuals with inherited deficiency of DNA mismatch repair.GASTROENTEROLOGY 1998;115:1387-1394