共查询到5条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Elastography Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Differentiating Endometrial Polyps and Submucosal Fibroids 下载免费PDF全文
Piotr Czuczwar MD PhD Slawomir Wozniak MD PhD Piotr Szkodziak MD PhD Marek J. Kudla MD PhD Krzysztof Pyra MD Tomasz Paszkowski MD PhD 《Journal of ultrasound in medicine》2016,35(11):2389-2395
2.
3.
4.
Mary L. Marnach Shannon K. Laughlin-Tommaso 《Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic》2019,94(2):326-335
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common condition that leads to increased health care costs and decreased quality of life. A systematic approach to AUB evaluation can simplify management and enhance women’s well-being. Abnormal uterine bleeding describes any variation from normal bleeding patterns in nonpregnant, reproductive-aged women beyond menarche lasting for at least 6 months. Ambiguous and inconsistent use of terminology and definitions to characterize AUB in the past decades necessitated a new, consensus-based approach to nomenclature and AUB evaluation. This led to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) System 1 in 2007, which standardized nomenclature, set parameters, and defined normal and abnormal bleeding based on the 5th to 95th percentile data from available large-scale epidemiologic studies. FIGO System 1, endorsed by several national and international societies, improved worldwide communication among educators, clinicians, and researchers. FIGO System 2, published in 2011, focused on classifications of AUB etiology into structural and nonstructural entities using the PALM-COEIN (polyp[s], adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy, coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, endometrial disorders, iatrogenic, and not yet classified) classification system. The PALM-COEIN classification is facilitated by a complete patient history combined with appropriate imaging, histopathologic analysis, or laboratory evaluation to ensure accurate diagnostic and treatment approaches to AUB. Herein we present the systematic evaluation of AUB. 相似文献
5.
《Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography》2020,33(8):917-933
Atherosclerotic plaque detection by carotid ultrasound provides cardiovascular disease risk stratification. The advantages and disadvantages of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound methods for carotid arterial plaque quantification are reviewed. Advanced and emerging methods of carotid arterial plaque activity and composition analysis by ultrasound are considered. Recommendations for the standardization of focused 2D and 3D carotid arterial plaque ultrasound image acquisition and measurement for the purpose of cardiovascular disease stratification are formulated. Potential clinical application towards cardiovascular risk stratification of recommended focused carotid arterial plaque quantification approaches are summarized. 相似文献