Daptomycin plus Fosfomycin,a Synergistic Combination in Experimental Implant-Associated Osteomyelitis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Rats

The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin in experimental chronic implant-associated osteomyelitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Infection was induced in the tibiae of rats by the insertion of a bacterial inoculum (1 to 5 × 10⁸ CFU/ml) of a clinical MRSA isolate and a titanium wire. Four weeks after infection, each animal was assigned to a treatment group: daptomycin monotherapy at 60 mg/kg of body weight once daily (n = 10), fosfomycin monotherapy at 40 mg/kg once daily (n = 10), or daptomycin and fosfomycin combined at 60 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, respectively, once daily (n = 9). Ten animals were left untreated. After a 3-week treatment period, the animals were euthanized, and the infected tibiae and implants were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The bacterial cultures from bones were positive for MRSA in all animals in the untreated group, the daptomycin group, and the fosfomycin group, with median bacterial counts of 2.34 × 10⁶ CFU/g bone, 1.57 × 10⁶ CFU/g bone, and 3.48 × 10² CFU/g bone, respectively. In the daptomycin-fosfomycin group, 6 out of 9 animals were positive for MRSA, with a median count of 7.92 CFU/g bone. Bacterial cultures derived from the titanium wires were negative in the fosfomycin- and daptomycin-fosfomycin-treated groups. Based on bacterial counts in bones, treatment with daptomycin-fosfomycin was statistically significantly superior to all that of the other groups (P ≤ 0.003). Fosfomycin was superior to daptomycin and no treatment (P < 0.0001). No development of resistance was observed in any treatment arm. The combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin demonstrated synergism against MRSA in experimental implant-associated osteomyelitis.     

High Activity of Fosfomycin and Rifampin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm In Vitro and in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model

Increasing antimicrobial resistance reduces treatment options for implant-associated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We evaluated the activity of fosfomycin alone and in combination with vancomycin, daptomycin, rifampin, and tigecycline against MRSA (ATCC 43300) in a foreign-body (implantable cage) infection model. The MICs of the individual agents were as follows: fosfomycin, 1 μg/ml; daptomycin, 0.125 μg/ml; vancomycin, 1 μg/ml; rifampin, 0.04 μg/ml; and tigecycline, 0.125 μg/ml. Microcalorimetry showed synergistic activity of fosfomycin and rifampin at subinhibitory concentrations against planktonic and biofilm MRSA. In time-kill curves, fosfomycin exhibited time-dependent activity against MRSA with a reduction of 2.5 log₁₀ CFU/ml at 128 × the MIC. In the animal model, planktonic bacteria in cage fluid were reduced by <1 log₁₀ CFU/ml with fosfomycin and tigecycline, 1.7 log₁₀ with daptomycin, 2.2 log₁₀ with fosfomycin-tigecycline and fosfomycin-vancomycin, 3.8 log₁₀ with fosfomycin-daptomycin, and >6.0 log₁₀ with daptomycin-rifampin and fosfomycin-rifampin. Daptomycin-rifampin cured 67% of cage-associated infections and fosfomycin-rifampin cured 83%, whereas all single drugs (fosfomycin, daptomycin, and tigecycline) and rifampin-free fosfomycin combinations showed no cure of MRSA cage-associated infections. No emergence of fosfomycin resistance was observed in animals; however, a 4-fold increase in fosfomycin MIC (from 2 to 16 μg/ml) occurred in the fosfomycin-vancomycin group. In summary, the highest eradication of MRSA cage-associated infections was achieved with fosfomycin in combination with rifampin (83%). Fosfomycin may be used in combination with rifampin against MRSA implant-associated infections, but it cannot replace rifampin as an antibiofilm agent.     

Efficacy of Teicoplanin and Autoradiographic Diffusion Pattern of [14C]Teicoplanin in Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Infection of Joint Prostheses

Prosthesis infections are difficult to cure. Infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococci is becoming more common in patients with orthopedic implants. Using a recently developed model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection of a knee prosthesis, we compared the efficacies of teicoplanin and vancomycin. [¹⁴C]teicoplanin diffusion in this model was also studied by autoradiography. A partial knee replacement was performed with a silicone implant fitting into the intramedullary canal of the tibia, and 10⁷ CFU of MRSA was injected into the knee. Treatment with teicoplanin or vancomycin (20 or 60 mg/kg of body weight, respectively, given intramuscularly twice daily) was started 7 days after inoculation and was continued for 7 days. The teicoplanin and vancomycin MICs for MRSA were 1 μg/ml. Mean peak and trough levels in serum were 39.1 and 23.5 μg/ml, respectively, for teicoplanin and 34.4 and 18.5 μg/ml, respectively, for vancomycin. Fifteen days after the end of therapy, the animals were killed and their tibias were removed, pulverized, and quantitatively cultured. Teicoplanin and vancomycin significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the bacterial density (2.7 ± 1.3 and 3.3 ± 1.6 log₁₀ CFU/g of bone, respectively) compared to those for the controls (5.04 ± 1.4 log₁₀ CFU/g of bone). The bacterial covents of teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated rabbits were comparable. The [¹⁴C]teicoplanin autoradiographic diffusion patterns in rabbits with prostheses, two of which were uninfected and two of which were infected, were studied 15 days after inoculation. Sixty minutes after the end of an infusion of 250 μCi of [¹⁴C]teicoplanin, autoradiography showed that in the infected animals, the highest levels of radioactivity were located around the prosthesis and in the periosteum, bone marrow, and trabecular bone. Radioactivity was less intense in epiphyseal disk cartilage, femoral cartilage, articular ligaments, and muscles and was weak in compact bone. A similar distribution pattern was seen in uninfected rabbits. Thus, teicoplanin may represent an effective alternative therapy for the treatment of these infections.     

Activities of Fosfomycin and Rifampin on Planktonic and Adherent Enterococcus faecalis Strains in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model

Enterococcal implant-associated infections are difficult to treat because antibiotics generally lack activity against enterococcal biofilms. We investigated fosfomycin, rifampin, and their combinations against planktonic and adherent Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 19433) in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC/MBC_log values were 32/>512 μg/ml for fosfomycin, 4/>64 μg/ml for rifampin, 1/2 μg/ml for ampicillin, 2/>256 μg/ml for linezolid, 16/32 μg/ml for gentamicin, 1/>64 μg/ml for vancomycin, and 1/5 μg/ml for daptomycin. In time-kill studies, fosfomycin was bactericidal at 8× and 16× MIC, but regrowth of resistant strains occurred after 24 h. With the exception of gentamicin, no complete inhibition of growth-related heat production was observed with other antimicrobials on early (3 h) or mature (24 h) biofilms. In the animal model, fosfomycin alone or in combination with daptomycin reduced planktonic counts by ≈4 log₁₀ CFU/ml below the levels before treatment. Fosfomycin cleared planktonic bacteria from 74% of cage fluids (i.e., no growth in aspirated fluid) and eradicated biofilm bacteria from 43% of cages (i.e., no growth from removed cages). In combination with gentamicin, fosfomycin cleared 77% and cured 58% of cages; in combination with vancomycin, fosfomycin cleared 33% and cured 18% of cages; in combination with daptomycin, fosfomycin cleared 75% and cured 17% of cages. Rifampin showed no activity on planktonic or adherent E. faecalis, whereas in combination with daptomycin it cured 17% and with fosfomycin it cured 25% of cages. Emergence of fosfomycin resistance was not observed in vivo. In conclusion, fosfomycin showed activity against planktonic and adherent E. faecalis. Its role against enterococcal biofilms should be further investigated, especially in combination with rifampin and/or daptomycin treatment.     

A Novel Approach Utilizing Biofilm Time-Kill Curves To Assess the Bactericidal Activity of Ceftaroline Combinations against Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Medical device infections frequently require combination therapy. Beta-lactams combined with glycopeptides/lipopeptides are bactericidal against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Novel macrowell kill-curve methods tested synergy between ceftaroline or cefazolin plus daptomycin, vancomycin, or rifampin against biofilm-producing MRSA. Ceftaroline combinations demonstrated the most pronounced bacterial reductions. Ceftaroline demonstrated greatest kill with daptomycin (4.02 ± 0.59 log₁₀ CFU/cm²), compared to combination with vancomycin (3.36 ± 0.35 log₁₀ CFU/cm²) or rifampin (2.68 ± 0.61 log₁₀ CFU/cm²). These data suggest that beta-lactam combinations are useful against MRSA biofilms.     

Ceftaroline-Fosamil Efficacy against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Rabbit Prosthetic Joint Infection Model

Ceftaroline (CPT), the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline-fosamil (CPT-F), demonstrates in vitro bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and is effective in rabbit models of difficult-to-treat MRSA endocarditis and acute osteomyelitis. However, its in vivo efficacy in a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) model is unknown. Using a MRSA-infected knee PJI model in rabbits, the efficacies of CPT-F or vancomycin (VAN) alone and combined with rifampin (RIF) were compared. After each partial knee replacement with a silicone implant that fit into the tibial intramedullary canal was performed, 5 × 10⁷ MRSA CFU (MICs of 0.38, 0.006, and 1 mg/liter for CPT, RIF, and VAN, respectively) was injected into the knee. Infected animals were randomly assigned to receive no treatment (controls) or CPT-F (60 mg/kg of body weight intramuscularly [i.m.]), VAN (60 mg/kg i.m.), CPT-F plus RIF (10 mg/kg i.m.), or VAN plus RIF starting 7 days postinoculation and lasting for 7 days. Surviving bacteria in crushed tibias were counted 3 days after ending treatment. Although the in vivo mean log₁₀ CFU/g of CPT-treated (3.0 ± 0.9, n = 12) and VAN-treated (3.5 ± 1.1, n = 12) crushed bones was significantly lower than those of controls (5.6 ± 1.1, n = 14) (P < 0.001), neither treatment fully sterilized the bones (3/12 were sterile with each treatment). The mean log₁₀ CFU/g values for the antibiotics in combination with RIF were 1.9 ± 0.5 (12/14 were sterile) for CPT-F and 1.9 ± 0.5 (12/14 were sterile) for VAN. In this MRSA PJI model, the efficacies of CPT-F and VAN did not differ; thus, CPT appears to be a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of MRSA PJIs.     

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Human Simulated Exposures of Telavancin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with and without Prior Vancomycin Exposure

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). The activity of telavancin against MRSA and MSSA after prior vancomycin exposure was studied in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Two clinical MRSA and two MSSA isolates, all with vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml, were subjected to humanized free drug exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h) for 96 h, telavancin at 750 mg q24h for 96 h, and vancomycin at 1 g q12h for 72 h followed by telavancin at 750 mg q24h for 48 h (120 h total). The microbiological responses were measured by changes from 0 h in log₁₀ CFU/ml at the end of experiments and area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curves over 96 h (AUBC₀₋₉₆). The control isolates grew to 8.8 ± 0.3 log₁₀ CFU/ml. Initially, all regimens caused −4.5 ± 0.9 reductions in log₁₀ CFU/ml by 48 h followed by slight regrowth over the following 48 to 72 h. After 96 h, vancomycin and telavancin achieved −3.7 ± 0.9 and −3.8 ± 0.8 log₁₀ CFU/ml changes from baseline, respectively (P = 0.74). Sequential exposure to telavancin after vancomycin did not result in additional CFU reductions or increases, with ultimate log₁₀ CFU/ml reductions of −4.3 ± 1.1 at 96 h and −4.2 ± 1.3 at 120 h (P > 0.05 for all comparisons at 96 h). The AUBC_0–96 was significantly smaller for the regimen of telavancin for 96 h than for the regimens of vancomycin for 96 h and vancomycin followed by telavancin (P ≤ 0.04). No resistance was observed throughout the experiment. Against these MRSA and MSSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml, telavancin was comparable with vancomycin and its activity was unaffected by prior vancomycin exposure.     

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Human Simulated Exposures of Ceftaroline and Daptomycin against MRSA,hVISA, and VISA with and without Prior Vancomycin Exposure

The effects of prior vancomycin exposure on ceftaroline and daptomycin therapy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have not been widely studied. Humanized free-drug exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h), ceftaroline at 600 mg q12h, and daptomycin at 10 mg/kg of body weight q24h were simulated in a 96-h in vitro pharmacodynamic model against three MRSA isolates, including one heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) isolate and one VISA isolate. A total of five regimens were tested: vancomycin, ceftaroline, and daptomycin alone for the entire 96 h, and then sequential therapy with vancomycin for 48 h followed by ceftaroline or daptomycin for 48 h. Microbiological responses were measured by the changes in log₁₀ CFU during 96 h from baseline. Control isolates grew to 9.16 ± 0.32, 9.13 ± 0.14, and 8.69 ± 0.28 log₁₀ CFU for MRSA, hVISA, and VISA, respectively. Vancomycin initially achieved ≥3 log₁₀ CFU reductions against the MRSA and hVISA isolates, followed by regrowth beginning at 48 h; minimal activity was observed against VISA. The change in 96-h log₁₀ CFU was largest for sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by ceftaroline (−5.22 ± 1.2, P = 0.010 versus ceftaroline) and for sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by ceftaroline (−3.60 ± 0.6, P = 0.037 versus daptomycin), compared with daptomycin (−2.24 ± 1.0), vancomycin (−1.40 ± 1.8), and sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by daptomycin (−1.32 ± 1.0, P > 0.5 for the last three regimens). Prior exposure of vancomycin at 1 g q12h reduced the initial microbiological response of daptomycin, particularly for hVISA and VISA isolates, but did not affect the response of ceftaroline. In the scenario of poor vancomycin response for high-inoculum MRSA infection, a ceftaroline-containing regimen may be preferred.     

Vancomycin-loaded titanium coatings with an interconnected micro-patterned structure for prophylaxis of infections: an in vivo study

Titanium (Ti) and its alloys are widely applied as orthopedic implants for hip and knee prostheses, fixation, and dental implants. However, Ti and its alloys are bioinert and susceptible to bacteria and biofilm formation. Thus, surface biofunctionalisation of Ti is essential for improving the biofunction of Ti. The current in vitro study indicated that calcium phosphate bone cement with vancomycin doped on micro-patterned Ti with a grid-like structure surface could preserve the property of inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation while not affecting the osteogenic differentiation. The present study investigated whether the biological performance of the bactericidal effect is preserved in vivo. The rabbit osteomyelitis model with tibial medullary cavity placement of Ti rods was employed to analyze the antibacterial effect of vancomycin-loaded Ti coatings with interconnected micro-patterned structure (TV). Thirty female rabbits (N = 10) were used to establish the implant-associated infection. Prior to implanting the T0 and TV rods into the medullary cavity of the left tibia of the rabbits, 10⁶ CFU mL⁻¹ methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was injected into the medullary cavity of the left tibia of the rabbits. The sterile Ti rod (NT) was used as the blank control. After 3 weeks, bone pathology was evaluated using X-ray and micro-CT. The in vivo study proposed that TV has the potential for prophylaxis against MRSA infection. Thus, the interconnected micro-patterned structured Ti rods loaded with vancomycin could be applied for preventing Ti implant-associated infections.

Vancomycin-loaded titanium coatings with an interconnected micro-patterned structure for prophylaxis of titanium implant associated infection.     

Pharmacological Properties of NAI-603, a Well-Tolerated Semisynthetic Derivative of Ramoplanin

NAI-603 is a ramoplanin derivative designed to overcome the tolerability issues of the parent drug as a systemic agent. NAI-603 is highly active against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria, with MICs ranging from 0.008 to 8 μg/ml. MICs were not significantly affected by pH (range, 6 to 8), by inoculum up to 10⁸ CFU/ml, or by addition of 50% human serum. Against staphylococci and enterococci, NAI-603 was rapidly bactericidal, with minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)/MIC ratios never exceeding 4. The frequency of spontaneous resistance was low at 2× to 4× MIC (≤1 × 10⁻⁶ to ≤1 × 10⁻⁸) and below the detection limit (about ≤1 × 10⁻⁹) at 8× MIC. Serial subcultures at 0.5× MIC yielded at most an 8-fold increase in MICs. In a systemic infection induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the 50% effective dose (ED₅₀) of intravenous (i.v.) NAI-603 was 0.4 mg/kg, lower than that of oral (p.o.) linezolid (1.4 mg/kg) and subcutaneous (s.c.) teicoplanin (1.4 mg/kg) or vancomycin (0.6 mg/kg). In neutropenic mice infected with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), the ED₅₀s for NAI-603 were 1.1 to 1.6 mg/kg i.v., compared to 0.5 mg/kg i.v. of ramoplanin. The bactericidal activity was confirmed in vivo in the rat granuloma pouch model induced by MRSA, where NAI-603, at 40 mg/kg i.v., induced about a 2- to 3-log₁₀-reduction in viable bacteria in the exudates, which persisted for more than 72 h. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of NAI-603 and ramoplanin at 20 mg/kg show similar half-lives (3.27 and 3.80 h, respectively) with the maximum concentration (C_max) markedly higher for NAI-603 (207 μg/ml versus 79 μg/ml). The favorable pharmacological profile of NAI-603, coupled with the absence of local tolerability issues, supports further investigation.     

Ceftobiprole Efficacy In Vitro against Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Production and In Vivo against Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in Rabbits

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) can cause osteomyelitis with severe sepsis and/or local complications in which a Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) role is suspected. In vitro sub-MIC antibiotic effects on growth and PVL production by 11 PVL⁺ MRSA strains, including the major CA-MRSA clones (USA300, including the LAC strain; USA400; and USA1000), and 11 PVL⁺ methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains were tested in microplate culture. Time-kill analyses with ceftobiprole at its MIC were also run with LAC. Efficacies of ceftobiprole (40 mg/kg of body weight subcutaneously [s.c.] four times a day [q.i.d.]) or vancomycin (60 mg/kg intramuscularly [i.m.] twice a day [b.i.d.]) alone or combined with rifampin (10 mg/kg b.i.d.) against rabbit CA-MRSA osteomyelitis, induced by tibial injection of 3.4 × 10⁷ CFU of LAC, were compared. Treatment, started 14 days postinoculation, lasted 14 days. In vitro, 6/11 strains cultured with sub-MICs of ceftobiprole produced 1.6- to 4.8-fold more PVL than did the controls, with no link to specific clones. Rifampin decreased PVL production by all tested strains. In time-kill analyses at the LAC MIC (0.75 mg/liter), PVL production rose transiently at 6 and 8 h and then declined 2-fold at 16 h, concomitant with a 2-log₁₀-CFU-count decrease. In vivo, the mean log₁₀ CFU/g of bone for ceftobiprole (1.44 ± 0.40) was significantly lower than that for vancomycin (2.37 ± 1.22) (P = 0.034), with 7/10 versus 5/11 bones sterilized, respectively. Combination with rifampin enhanced ceftobiprole (1.16 ± 0.04 CFU/g of bone [P = 0.056], 11/11 sterile bones) and vancomycin (1.23 ± 0.06 CFU/g [P = 0.011], 11/11 sterile bones) efficacies. Ceftobiprole bactericidal activity and the rifampin anti-PVL effect could play a role in these findings, which should be of interest for treating CA-MRSA osteomyelitis.     

Activities of Fosfomycin,Tigecycline, Colistin,and Gentamicin against Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Foreign-Body Infection Model

Limited antimicrobial agents are available for the treatment of implant-associated infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. We compared the activities of fosfomycin, tigecycline, colistin, and gentamicin (alone and in combination) against a CTX-M15-producing strain of Escherichia coli (Bj HDE-1) in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration in logarithmic phase (MBC_log) and stationary phase (MBC_stat) were 0.12, 0.12, and 8 μg/ml for fosfomycin, 0.25, 32, and 32 μg/ml for tigecycline, 0.25, 0.5, and 2 μg/ml for colistin, and 2, 8, and 16 μg/ml for gentamicin, respectively. In time-kill studies, colistin showed concentration-dependent activity, but regrowth occurred after 24 h. Fosfomycin demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity at the MIC, and no regrowth occurred. Synergistic activity between fosfomycin and colistin in vitro was observed, with no detectable bacterial counts after 6 h. In animal studies, fosfomycin reduced planktonic counts by 4 log₁₀ CFU/ml, whereas in combination with colistin, tigecycline, or gentamicin, it reduced counts by >6 log₁₀ CFU/ml. Fosfomycin was the only single agent which was able to eradicate E. coli biofilms (cure rate, 17% of implanted, infected cages). In combination, colistin plus tigecycline (50%) and fosfomycin plus gentamicin (42%) cured significantly more infected cages than colistin plus gentamicin (33%) or fosfomycin plus tigecycline (25%) (P < 0.05). The combination of fosfomycin plus colistin showed the highest cure rate (67%), which was significantly better than that of fosfomycin alone (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the combination of fosfomycin plus colistin is a promising treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.     

Minocycline and Cefotaxime in the Treatment of Experimental Murine Vibrio vulnificus Infection

We conducted an in vivo study with the mouse model of Vibrio vulnificus infection to evaluate the efficacies of therapy with minocycline or cefotaxime alone and in combination. V. vulnificus was introduced subcutaneously into the area over the right thigh. The inoculum size ranged from 1.0 × 10³ to 1.2 × 10⁸ CFU from experiment to experiment but was constant for all animals in the same experiment. Antibiotics were given intraperitoneally 2 h after the bacteria were inoculated. In experiments 1 to 4, the standard dose for humans was used to treat the infection, while in experiment 5, five times the standard dose for humans was used to treat the infection. In experiment 1, with a small inoculum of 5 × 10³ CFU, all mice in the saline-treated control group and the cefotaxime-, minocycline-, and combined antibiotic-treated groups survived. In experiment 2, with a moderate inoculum of 1.2 × 10⁵ CFU, all the mice in the three antibiotic-treated groups survived, while only two of nine mice in the control group survived. In experiment 3, with a large inoculum of 8.0 × 10⁷ CFU, six of nine mice in the combined antibiotic-treated group survived, while only one of nine mice in the cefotaxime-treated group and none of the mice in the control and minocycline-treated groups survived. In experiment 4, with a large inoculum of 1.2 × 10⁸ CFU, 8 of 20 mice in the combined antibiotic-treated group survived, while none of the 20 mice in the control group, the group treated with cefotaxime alone, and the group treated with minocycline alone survived. In experiment 5, in which mice were infected with a large inoculum of 6.6 × 10⁷ CFU and treated with five times the standard human dose of antibiotics, 10 of 12 mice in the combined antibiotic-treated group survived, while only 4 of 12 mice in the minocycline-treated group, 1 of 12 mice in the cefotaxime-treated group, and none of the mice in the control group survived. In experiments 3 to 5, the difference in the survival rates between the combined antibiotic-treated and minocycline-treated groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). These results indicate that combination therapy with cefotaxime and minocycline is distinctly more advantageous than therapy with the single antibiotic regimen for the treatment of severe experimental V. vulnificus infections.     

Influence of Test Conditions on Antifungal Time-Kill Curve Results: Proposal for Standardized Methods

This study was designed to examine the effects of antifungal carryover, agitation, and starting inoculum on the results of time-kill tests conducted with various Candida species. Two isolates each of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, and Candida glabrata were utilized. Test antifungal agents included fluconazole, amphotericin B, and LY303366. Time-kill tests were conducted in RPMI 1640 medium buffered with morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) to a pH of 7.0 and incubated at 35°C. Prior to testing, the existence of antifungal carryover was evaluated at antifungal concentrations ranging from 1× to 16× MIC by four plating methods: direct plating of 10, 30, and 100 μl of test suspension and filtration of 30 μl of test suspension through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter. Time-kill curves were performed with each isolate at drug concentrations equal to 2× MIC, using a starting inoculum of approximately 10⁵ CFU/ml, and incubated with or without agitation. Last, inoculum experiments were conducted over three ranges of starting inocula: 5 × 10² to 1 × 10⁴, >1 × 10⁴ to 1 × 10⁶, and >1 × 10⁶ to 1 × 10⁸ CFU/ml. Significant antifungal carryover (>25% reduction in CFU/milliliter from the control value) was observed with amphotericin B and fluconazole; however, carryover was eliminated with filtration. Agitation did not appreciably affect results. The starting inoculum did not significantly affect the activity of fluconazole or amphotericin B; however, the activity of LY303366 may be influenced by the starting inoculum. Before antifungal time-kill curve methods are routinely employed by investigators, methodology should be scrutinized and standardized procedures should be developed.     

Evaluation of Vancomycin in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Oxacillin against Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates and Vancomycin-Intermediate S. aureus Isolates In Vitro

Vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam is used as empirical therapy for critically ill patients. Studies of this combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) are limited, but β-lactams in combination with vancomycin have shown synergistic activity against MRSA and VISA. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin were synergistic against MRSA and VISA in vitro. Bloodstream MRSA (n = 20) and VISA (n = 4) strains were selected. In vitro antimicrobial activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and oxacillin were evaluated by disk diffusion, and MICs were determined by Etest using Muller-Hinton agar with and without vancomycin at one-half the MIC. Time-kill studies evaluated 14 MRSA and all 4 VISA isolates using piperacillin-tazobactam at 300/35 mg/liter or oxacillin at 40 mg/liter alone and with vancomycin at one-half the MIC. Mean zones of inhibition for piperacillin-tazobactam and oxacillin increased with vancomycin against MRSA and VISA (P < 0.001 for all), and the MIC₉₀ decreased with vancomycin against MRSA and VISA to values meeting susceptibility criteria for S. aureus (P < 0.001 for both antibiotics against MRSA). In MRSA time-kill studies, the mean 24-h reductions in inoculum for piperacillin-tazobactam, piperacillin-tazobactam with vancomycin, and oxacillin with vancomycin were 3.53, 3.69, and 2.62 log₁₀ CFU/ml, respectively. The mean 24-h reductions in VISA inoculum for piperacillin-tazobactam, piperacillin-tazobactam with vancomycin, and oxacillin with vancomycin were 2.85, 2.93, and 3.45 log₁₀ CFU/ml, respectively. Vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam or oxacillin demonstrated synergistic activity against MRSA and VISA. The clinical implications of these combinations against MRSA and VISA should be investigated.     

Impact of Inoculum Size and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) on Vancomycin Activity and Emergence of VISA in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model

The activity of vancomycin against heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) and non-hVISA isolates, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, was reduced in the presence of a high inoculum amount (10⁸ CFU/ml). A high bacterial load of >10⁵ CFU/ml persisted for all strains with doses up to 5 g every 12 h against high inoculum amounts. No change in the vancomycin MIC was detected in any isolate at a moderate inoculum amount (10⁶ CFU/ml), and bactericidal activity occurred only against the non-hVISA isolate (time to 99% kill, 7.5 h; P = 0.001).     

Fosfomycin Synergy In Vitro with Amoxicillin,Daptomycin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium from Renal Transplant Patients with Infected Urinary Stents

Fosfomycin is a potential option for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections despite limited in vitro and clinical data. In this study, 32 VRE isolates from renal transplant patients with urinary stent infections were susceptible to fosfomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid and resistant to amoxicillin, minocycline, and nitrofurantoin based on their MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s. Fosfomycin was bacteriostatic at 0.5 to 16× the MIC (32 to 2,048 μg/ml); synergy occurred when fosfomycin was combined with daptomycin (2.8 to 3.9 log₁₀ CFU/ml kill; P < 0.001) or amoxicillin (2.6 to 3.4; P < 0.05). These combinations may be potent options to treat VRE urinary infections pending investigation of clinical efficacy.     

Efficacy of Daptomycin in Implant-Associated Infection Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Importance of Combination with Rifampin

Limited treatment options are available for implant-associated infections caused by methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We compared the activity of daptomycin (alone and with rifampin [rifampicin]) with the activities of other antimicrobial regimens against MRSA ATCC 43300 in the guinea pig foreign-body infection model. The daptomycin MIC and the minimum bactericidal concentration in logarithmic phase and stationary growth phase of MRSA were 0.625, 0.625, and 20 μg/ml, respectively. In time-kill studies, daptomycin showed rapid and concentration-dependent killing of MRSA in stationary growth phase. At concentrations above 20 μg/ml, daptomycin reduced the counts by >3 log₁₀ CFU/ml in 2 to 4 h. In sterile cage fluid, daptomycin peak concentrations of 23.1, 46.3, and 53.7 μg/ml were reached 4 to 6 h after the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. In treatment studies, daptomycin alone reduced the planktonic MRSA counts by 0.3 log₁₀ CFU/ml, whereas in combination with rifampin, a reduction in the counts of >6 log₁₀ CFU/ml was observed. Vancomycin and daptomycin (at both doses) were unable to cure any cage-associated infection when they were given as monotherapy, whereas rifampin alone cured the infections in 33% of the cages. In combination with rifampin, daptomycin showed cure rates of 25% (at 20 mg/kg) and 67% (at 30 mg/kg), vancomycin showed a cure rate of 8%, linezolid showed a cure rate of 0%, and levofloxacin showed a cure rate of 58%. In addition, daptomycin at a high dose (30 mg/kg) completely prevented the emergence of rifampin resistance in planktonic and adherent MRSA cells. Daptomycin at a high dose, corresponding to 6 mg/kg in humans, in combination with rifampin showed the highest activity against planktonic and adherent MRSA. Daptomycin plus rifampin is a promising treatment option for implant-associated MRSA infections.Implants are increasingly used in modern medicine to replace a compromised biological function or missing anatomical structure. Periprosthetic infections represent a devastating complication, causing high rates of morbidity and consuming considerable health care resources. Implant-associated infections are caused by microorganisms growing adherent to the device surface and embedded in an extracellular polymeric matrix, a complex three-dimensional structure called a microbial biofilm (8). Bacterial communities in biofilms cause persistent infection due to increased resistance to antibiotics and the immune system and the difficulty with eradicating them from the implant (6).Staphylococcus aureus is one of the leading pathogens causing implant-associated infections. Successful treatment requires the use of bactericidal drugs acting on surface-adhering microorganisms, which predominantly exist in the stationary growth phase. Previous in vitro, experimental, and clinical studies demonstrated that rifampin (rifampicin)-containing antimicrobial regimens were able to eradicate staphylococcal biofilms and cure implant-associated infections (23, 25). Quinolones are often used in combination with rifampin in order to prevent the emergence of rifampin resistance (4, 19, 21). However, methicillin (meticillin)-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains are often resistant to quinolones. In addition, MRSA strains were recently shown to have decreased susceptibility to vancomycin, reducing the efficacy of this drug. Therefore, alternative drugs for use in combination with rifampin against implant-associated infections are needed (12, 20).Daptomycin is a negatively charged cyclic lipopeptide with bactericidal activity against gram-positive organisms, including MRSA (17). The drug inserts into the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane in a calcium-dependent fashion, leading to rapid cell death without lysis, and causing only minimal inflammation (15). Daptomycin has been well tolerated in healthy volunteers dosed with up to 12 mg/kg of body weight intravenously for 14 days (2). Only limited data on the use of daptomycin in combination with rifampin against staphylococcal implant-associated infections are available.In this study, we investigated the activity of daptomycin against MRSA ATCC 43300 in vitro. In addition, we evaluated the activity of daptomycin in combination with rifampin in a cage-associated infection model in guinea pigs and compared the efficacy of the treatment with the efficacies of three other antibiotics commonly used against MRSA, vancomycin, linezolid, and levofloxacin (alone and in combination with rifampin).(Part of the results of the present study were presented at the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, DC, 24 to 29 October 2008 [abstr. B-1000].)     

In Vitro Activity of Human-Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Ceftaroline,Ceftriaxone, and Vancomycin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant (MRSA) strains, is an important pathogen of bacterial pneumonia. As antibiotic concentrations at the site of infection are responsible for killing, we investigated the activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures of three antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin) commonly used for treatment of S. aureus pneumonia. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate ELF exposures of vancomycin (1 g every 12 h [q12h]), ceftaroline (600 mg q12h and q8h), and ceftriaxone (2 g q24h and q12h). Four S. aureus isolates (2 MSSA and 2 MRSA) were evaluated over 72 h with a starting inoculum of ∼10⁶ CFU/ml. Time-kill curves were constructed, and microbiological response (change in log₁₀ CFU/ml from 0 h and the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve [AUBC]) was assessed in duplicate. The change in 72-h log₁₀ CFU/ml was largest for ceftaroline q8h (reductions of >3 log₁₀ CFU/ml against all strains). This regimen also achieved the lowest AUBC against all organisms (P < 0.05). Vancomycin produced reliable bacterial reductions of 0.9 to 3.3 log₁₀ CFU/ml, while the activity of ceftaroline q12h was more variable (reductions of 0.2 to 2.3 log₁₀ CFU/ml against 3 of 4 strains). Both regimens of ceftriaxone were poorly active against MSSA tested (0.1 reduction to a 1.8-log₁₀ CFU/ml increase). Against these S. aureus isolates, ELF exposures of ceftaroline 600 mg q8h exhibited improved antibacterial activity compared with ceftaroline 600 mg q12h and vancomycin, and therefore, this q8h regimen deserves further evaluation for the treatment of bacterial pneumonia. These data also suggest that ceftriaxone should be avoided for S. aureus pneumonia.