Utility of droplet digital PCR for the quantitative detection of polyomavirus JC in clinical samples

BackgroundQuantitative PCR (qPCR) is the standard molecular method for detection of polyomavirus JC (JCPyV) DNA reactivation in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients at risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Recently, digital PCR has shown potential benefits over qPCR in viral diagnostics.ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay in assessing JCPyV-DNA status in clinical samples of patients at risk for PML.Study designJCPyV specific ddPCR was developed with primers/probes targeting Large T and the noncoding control region used in qPCR. The ddPCR accuracy of JCPyV-DNA quantification was investigated using serial dilutions of genomic JCPyV-DNA. The ddPCR JCPyV-DNA quantification and qPCR confirmation were performed on 150 CSF and 100 serum clinical samples.ResultsUsing genomic JCPyV-DNA, ddPCR was highly sensitive, repeatable and reproducible for both molecular targets. Using clinical samples, JCPyV-DNA was detected in 13% of CSF and in 50% of serum samples with limit of detection of 30 copies/ml. Among the 19 JCPyV-DNA-positive CSF detected using the ddPCR, 15 also tested positive with the qPCR. Among the 50 JCPyV-DNA-positive serum identified with ddPCR, 41 tested positive with qPCR. All the ddPCR-negative samples were negative when assessed using qPCR. Additionally, the mean JCPyV-DNA viral load obtained with ddPCR in all samples was not significantly different from that of qPCR.ConclusionThe results demonstrate that ddPCR is a highly sensitive alternative for measuring JCPyV-DNA that should be considered in clinical diagnostic testing of JCPyV-DNA in patients at risk of PML and other associated diseases.     

Detection of Rare Drug Resistance Mutations by Digital PCR in a Human Influenza A Virus Model System and Clinical Samples

Digital PCR (dPCR) is being increasingly used for the quantification of sequence variations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), due to its high accuracy and precision in comparison with techniques such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) and melt curve analysis. To develop and evaluate dPCR for SNP detection using DNA, RNA, and clinical samples, an influenza virus model of resistance to oseltamivir (Tamiflu) was used. First, this study was able to recognize and reduce off-target amplification in dPCR quantification, thereby enabling technical sensitivities down to 0.1% SNP abundance at a range of template concentrations, a 50-fold improvement on the qPCR assay used routinely in the clinic. Second, a method was developed for determining the false-positive rate (background) signal. Finally, comparison of dPCR with qPCR results on clinical samples demonstrated the potential impact dPCR could have on clinical research and patient management by earlier (trace) detection of rare drug-resistant sequence variants. Ultimately this could reduce the quantity of ineffective drugs taken and facilitate early switching to alternative medication when available. In the short term such methods could advance our understanding of microbial dynamics and therapeutic responses in a range of infectious diseases such as HIV, viral hepatitis, and tuberculosis. Furthermore, the findings presented here are directly relevant to other diagnostic areas, such as the detection of rare SNPs in malignancy, monitoring of graft rejection, and fetal screening.     

Comparison of two quantitative CMV PCR tests, Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor and TaqMan assay, and pp65-antigenemia assay in the determination of viral loads from peripheral blood of organ transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative PCR assays have become the most common methods in the determination of viral load during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of transplant patients. However, usually these tests are still quite time-consuming and labor-intensive which diminishes their utility of these tests in routine diagnostic laboratories. Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a quantitative CMV PCR test which is time-saving and easy to perform for the detection and monitoring of CMV infection of transplant patients. STUDY DESIGN: The quantitative real time CMV PCR assay using TaqMan chemistry and an automated sample preparation system, MagNA Pure LC, was developed. The designed quantitative CMV test was compared to commercial quantitative PCR test, Cobas Amplicor Monitor, in the determination of CMV DNA loads in plasma samples of liver and kidney transplant patients. The results were also correlated with the CMV pp65-antigenemia test. The clinical material of 270 blood specimens of transplant patients were tested using these two PCR methods and pp65-antigenemia test in parallel. Plasma samples were used for PCR assays and leucocytes for the antigenemia test. RESULTS: The TaqMan assay described was easy to perform, it was rapid (3-4 h) and hands-on time needed for performing the test was short. The detection limit of the assay was 250 copies/ml (cps/ml) plasma and the linear range up to 25,000,000 cps/ml. TaqMan assay was the most sensitive test detecting 92% of the CMV positive findings. Cobas Monitor detected 80% and pp65 test 88% of the positive findings. The correlations between TaqMan and antigenemia assays, and between Cobas Amplicor and antigenemia were statistically significant and high, R = 0.84 (P < 0.0001) and R = 0.80 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Also correlation between two PCR tests was statistically significant (R = 0.64, P < 0.0001). Of the 27 patient studied, 19 demonstrated CMV antigenemia and DNAemia in their blood during the post transplant monitoring. Thirteen of these patients developed a symptomatic CMV infection and were treated with ganciclovir. The peak viral loads of symptomatic patients were statistically higher by all three methods than those of asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The developed real time TaqMan assay was rapid and easily performed and could be the best alternative for the diagnosis of CMV infection and monitoring of liver and kidney transplant patients.     

Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a Duplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay

Health care-associated infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contribute to significant hospitalization costs. We report here a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay, which is a next-generation emulsion-based endpoint PCR assay for high-precision MRSA analysis. Reference cultures of MRSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and confounders were included as controls. Copan swabs were used to sample cultures and collect specimens for analysis from patients at a large teaching hospital. Swab extraction and cell lysis were accomplished using magnetic-driven agitation of silica beads. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Roche Light Cycler 480) and ddPCR (Bio-Rad QX100 droplet digital PCR system) assays were used to detect genes for the staphylococcal protein SA0140 (SA) and the methicillin resistance (mecA) gene employing standard TaqMan chemistries. Both qPCR and ddPCR assays correctly identified culture controls for MRSA (76), MSSA (12), and confounder organisms (36) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Analysis of the clinical samples (211 negative and 186 positive) collected during a study of MRSA nasal carriage allowed direct comparison of the qPCR and ddPCR assays to the Cepheid MRSA GeneXpert assay. A total of 397 clinical samples were examined in this study. Cepheid MRSA GeneXpert values were used to define negative and positive samples. Both the qPCR and ddPCR assays were in good agreement with the reference assay. The sensitivities for the qPCR and ddPCR assays were 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.1 to 98.5%) and 96.8% (95% CI, 93.1 to 98.5%), respectively. Both the qPCR and ddPCR assays had specificities of 91.9% (95% CI, 87.5 to 94.9%) for qPCR and 91.0% (95% CI, 86.4 to 94.2%) for ddPCR technology.     

Quantitative PCR in the diagnosis of CMV infection and in the monitoring of viral load during the antiviral treatment in renal transplant patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant problem in transplantation. In this study, a quantitative PCR test was compared with the CMVpp65 antigenemia assay not only in the diagnosis CMV infections but especially in the monitoring of viral loads during ganciclovir treatment of CMV disease in individual renal transplant patients. Altogether 342 blood specimens were obtained from 116 patients. Blood specimens were used for Cobas Amplicor Monitor plasma PCR and for the pp65 assay. Also shell vial culture was performed. The patients with a positive pp65 finding were monitored for CMV weekly during ganciclovir treatment and/or until the antigenemia subsided. CMV was detected in 31/116 (27%) patients, of whom 14 (12%) developed CMV disease and were treated with ganciclovir. CMV was found by shell vial culture in 13/14 cases, but by PCR and pp65 test in all 14 patients. CMV was detected in 156 (45%) samples; by PCR in 121/156 (range 344-103,000 copies/ml) and by pp65 test in 138/156 (range 1-1,000 positive cells/50,000 leukocytes) and by culture in 59/156 (38%) only. The peak viral loads were significantly (P<0.0001) higher in CMV disease than in untreated infections (19,650 vs. 379 copies/ml, and 100 vs. 5pp65 positive cells). In the monitoring of individual patients, the time-related CMV-DNAemia and pp65 antigenemia correlated well during the treatment of CMV disease. In conclusion, Cobas Amplicor Monitor plasma PCR and CMVpp65 antigen assays can be equally used in the diagnosis CMV infection and in the monitoring of viral load during antiviral treatment.     

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant recipients by an ultrasensitive plasma PCR assay

Early and accurate monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid-organ transplant recipients is of major importance. We have assessed the potential benefit of an ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR assay for renal transplant recipients. The pp65 CMV antigen (pp65 Ag) assay using leukocytes was employed as a routine test for the monitoring of CMV in 23 transplant recipients. We compared the pp65 antigenemia with the CMV load quantified by an ultrasensitive PCR (US-PCR) with a limit of detection of 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. CMV infection was detected in 215 (67%) of 321 plasma samples by the US-PCR compared with 124 (39%) of 321 samples by the pp65 Ag assay. The US-PCR assay permitted the detection of CMV infection episodes following transplantation a median of 12 days earlier than the pp65 Ag assay. Moreover, during CMV infection episodes, DNA detection by the US-PCR was consistently positive, whereas false negative results were frequently observed with the pp65 Ag assay. We found a good correlation between the two assays, and the peak viral loads were significantly higher in patients with CMV-related complications (median, 5000 DNA copies/ml) than in those without symptoms (1160 DNA copies/ml) (P = 0.048). In addition, patients that did not require preemptive therapy based on the results of the pp65 assay had CMV loads significantly lower (median, 36 DNA copies/ml) than those that needed treatment (median, 4703 DNA copies/ml) (P < 0.001). These observations provided cutoff levels that could be applied in clinical practice. The ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR detected CMV infection episodes earlier and provided more consistent results than the pp65 Ag assay. This test could improve the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in renal transplant recipients.     

Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus Viral Loads by Two Molecular Assays in Whole-Blood and Plasma Samples from Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are typically monitored using quantitative molecular assays. The Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV test (Cobas CMV) has recently been cleared by the FDA for the monitoring of CMV viral loads in plasma samples from transplant patients. In this study, we compare and correlate the viral loads obtained by a laboratory-developed test (LC CMV) (using Roche analyte-specific reagents [ASR] on the LightCycler 2.0) on whole-blood specimens with those obtained on corresponding plasma and whole-blood specimens by the Cobas CMV assay. Testing was performed on 773 archived patient specimens. The strength of the agreement was good for the two assays performed on whole blood (κ = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.7) and moderate when the tests were performed on different sample types (κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.62 for the LC CMV whole blood [WB] assay versus Cobas plasma [PL], and κ = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.65 for the Cobas WB assay versus Cobas PL), although the difference was not statistically significant. Using a combination gold standard (i.e., a true positive was a specimen that was positive by two or more methods), the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were 78.8% and 99.3% for the LC CMV assay, 85.2% and 98.1% for the Cobas CMV WB assay, and 100% and 90.5% for Cobas CMV PL assay, respectively. A comparison of the CMV viral load trends in both plasma and whole blood from a few patients with multiple positive successive samples showed similar slopes, with differences in the slope ranging from 0.01 to 0.22. However, the absolute value for individual viral load differed markedly with whole-blood viral loads, being on average 0.5- to 1.22-log higher than those in plasma. The Cobas CMV assay provides a valid option for the monitoring of viral loads in transplant patients. Due to its increased sensitivity, the detection of CMV DNA in patients with low viral loads (i.e., those below limit of quantification [LOQ]) is increased with the Cobas CMV assay in plasma specimens. Longitudinal prospective studies will be needed to examine the clinical significance of these low-level viral loads.     

Concurrent genotyping and quantitation of cytomegalovirus gB genotypes in solid-organ-transplant recipients by use of a real-time PCR assay

We have developed a real-time genotyping and quantitative PCR (RT-GQ-PCR) assay to genotype cytomegalovirus (CMV) and quantify viral loads simultaneously in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Special minor-groove DNA-binding probes were designed based on sequence polymorphism in the gB gene to increase genotyping specificity for gB1 to gB4. For validation, 28 samples with known genotypes determined by restriction fragment analysis (RFA) and 121 with unknown genotypes were tested. All samples were from SOT patients with CMV viremia. A 100% concordance for genotyping was achieved by using the RT-GQ-PCR with known genotypes determined by RFA. The RT-GQ-PCR identified more cases of CMV infections with mixed genotypes than RFA did. No cross-reaction between genotypes was observed. All four gB genotypes were detected in the 121 samples of unknown genotype. gB1 was the predominant single genotype (n = 61, 50.4%), followed by gB2 (n = 26, 21.0%), gB3, (n = 11, 9.1%), and gB4 (n = 3, 2.5%). Mixed-genotype infections were detected in 17% (20/121) of the samples. Patients with mixed-genotype infections had significantly higher CMV viral loads than those with single-genotype infections (P = 0.019). The RT-GQ-PCR assay was found to be highly sensitive and specific, with a wide dynamic range (2.7 to 10.7 log₁₀ copies/ml) and very good precision (coefficient of variation, ~1.78%). With the prominent feature of concurrent CMV gB genotyping and quantitation in a single reaction, the new assay provides a rapid and cost-effective method for monitoring CMV infection in SOT recipients.     

Prediction of cytomegalovirus (CMV) plasma load from evaluation of CMV whole-blood load in samples from renal transplant recipients

In a prospective cohort of 82 renal transplant recipients, we evaluated the capacity of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) load in whole blood (WB) to predict the plasma CMV load, aiming to identify active CMV infections by using WB samples only and to deduce a WB threshold. Using quantitative real-time PCR, a total of 1,474 WB samples were assayed, of which 279 were positive for CMV, and 140 out of the 276 paired plasma samples tested positive. Thirty (36.6%) patients presented with at least one positive plasma PCR result, and 21 infection episodes (19 patients) required curative treatment (median follow-up time, 12 months). When the plasma CMV load was >500 copies/ml (n = 70), more than 94% (95% confidence interval, 86.0%, 98.4%) of WB samples had >500 copies/ml. Two prediction models were built: log₁₀ plasma viral load (VL) was calculated as −0.3777 + 0.9342 × log₁₀ WB VL and as −0.3777 + 0.8563 × log₁₀ WB VL for patients with and without treatment, respectively. In the validation sample (578 routine samples), 77.2% of the observed and expected plasma viral loads were concordant (95% confidence intervals, 73.5 and 80.5%). According to the model, the plasma viral load was >500 copies/ml when the WB load was >3,170 or >4,000 copies/ml in patients with or without treatment, respectively. WB seems to be an appropriate candidate for routine CMV monitoring of transplant recipients by using a single assay.     

Monitoring of viral load by quantitative plasma PCR during active cytomegalovirus infection of individual liver transplant patients

A quantitative PCR test, the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor, was used for the monitoring of viral load in the peripheral blood of 27 individual liver transplant patients and correlated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia. Altogether, 243 specimens were analyzed. During the first 3 months, 20 patients showed PCR positivity which correlated with pp65 antigenemia. Of those, 13 patients developed symptomatic CMV infection 27 to 52 days after transplantation, with a significantly higher peak viral load in PCR and in pp65 assay compared with the seven asymptomatic infections (median 10,200 versus 2,240 copies/ml, P < 0.05, and median 100 versus 30 pp65-positive cells/50,000 leukocytes, P < 0.01). Five were primary infections of D+/R- cases (donor CMV seropositive and recipient seronegative) and demonstrated, except in one case, a high peak viral load (>10,000 copies/ml; range, 10,200 to 21,600 copies, and > or =50 positive cells, range, 50 to 800 cells). The peak viral loads of the six D+/R+ patients with symptomatic infection varied widely (range, 2,290 to 126,000 copies and 50 to 300 positive cells). Two D-/R+ patients developed symptomatic infection with a lower viral load (range, 1,120 to 6,510 copies and 25 to 100 positive cells). All symptomatic infections were successfully treated with ganciclovir. The asymptomatic infections all in D+/R+ patients with low copy numbers (<5,500 copies) were monitored until CMV disappeared. One of the seven PCR-negative patients had one sample with low antigenemia, but the subsequent specimens were all negative. The time-related correlation of the two methods was also good. In summary, quantitative PCR could equally well be used as the CMV pp65 assay for the monitoring of viral load in individual transplant patients.     

Development of a new quantitative real-time HHV-6-PCR and monitoring of HHV-6 DNAaemia after liver transplantation

A quantitative HHV-6 PCR (qPCR) assay was developed and compared to an "in-house" qualitative PCR and to the commercial quantitative Argene CMV, HHV6, 7, 8 R-gene? test. Clinical specimens consisting of 127 whole blood and 57 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens were tested using the two qPCRs and the qualitative PCR in parallel. When the qualitative PCR was used as a "gold standard," the sensitivities of the qPCRs for the blood samples were 86% for the "in-house" qPCR and 76% for the Argene's test and the specificities were 96% and 92%, respectively. With CSF specimens the sensitivities were 92% and 80% and the specificities 98% and 82%, respectively. Furthermore, the two qPCRs were compared in the monitoring of liver transplant patients and retrospectively correlated to HHV-6 antigenaemia. In total, 223 blood specimens were tested. HHV-6 antigenaemia had been found in 21/36 (58%) patients and HHV-6 DNAaemia was demonstrated in 18/36 (50%). Viral loads by the "in-house" test varied from 280 to 19700 copies/ml (median 1200) and by Argene's test from 120 to 24070 copies/ml (median 458). The correlation of viral loads between the two qPCRs was good (R=0.94, p<0.01). The new in-house test was found to be reliable for the detection and quantitation of HHV-6 DNA in clinical specimens.     

Development and evaluation of an internally controlled semiautomated PCR assay for quantification of cell-free cytomegalovirus

Quantification of circulating human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is useful in clinical contexts such as virological surveillance of bone marrow transplant recipients and monitoring of antiviral therapy. This report describes an internally controlled, quantitative, semiautomated, HCMV genome assay that was developed primarily to measure HCMV DNA in the plasma of severely leucopaenic patients. It exhibits greater sensitivity, wider dynamic range and higher sample throughput than a number of previously described commercial and "in-house" assays. Viral DNA extraction from EDTA plasma samples was automated using a BioRobot 9604 (Qiagen). HCMV strain AD169 was used to prepare a calibration curve and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) strain Smith was added as internal control to all calibration standards and test samples. Amplification was performed using a set of primers based on the HCMV UL50 region, capable of amplifying both human and murine CMV. The yield of biotinylated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products was estimated using HCMV-specific and MCMV-specific enzyme-labelled probes and automated chemiluminescence detection. Log-transformed HCMV-to-MCMV signal ratios were calculated and used for quantification of test samples against simultaneously extracted MCMV-spiked calibration standards. Evaluation of the assay sensitivity by Probit analysis demonstrated a 95% probability of detection at 100 HCMV genomes per ml of plasma; the dynamic range was shown to be > or = 4 log(10). A total of 315 samples from 61 bone marrow transplant patients were analysed by both the quantitative PCR (qPCR) and by a previously validated nested nonquantitative PCR (NQPCR). A high level of concordance (90%) was observed between the two assays, although the qPCR assay exhibited slightly greater sensitivity.     

Analytic validation of a quantitative real-time PCR assay to measure CMV viral load in whole blood.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. We compared the CMV pp65 antigenemia test with a less labor intensive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in 109 whole blood samples predominantly from transplant patients and patients with AIDS. DNA was amplified on an Applied Biosystems 7900 instrument using a TaqMan probe targeting the CMV polymerase gene and the APOB human control gene. The DNA assay was linear over a 6-log range from 8 to 800,000 CMV genomes per reaction; coefficient of variation was 20%. CMV DNA was undetectable in 20 blood samples from healthy donors whereas it was detected in 55 of 109 patient samples. Results were concordant in a nonlinear fashion with those of the antigenemia test in 90/109 (83%). Evaluation of the discrepancies suggested that either PCR or antigenemia assays could be falsely negative when virus levels were quite low. A point mutation interfered with probe binding in 1 sample. A second real-time PCR targeting the immediate early gene was even more likely to be false negative. In summary, CMV viral load measurement targeting the polymerase gene is nearly equivalent to the antigenemia assay for detecting and monitoring active CMV infection in whole blood samples.     

Identification of a novel bovine copiparvovirus in pooled fetal bovine serum

Virus Genes - A novel parvovirus was identified as a cell culture contaminant by metagenomic analysis. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to determine viral loads in the cell culture supernatant...     

Qualitative and semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction testing for cytomegalovirus DNA in serum allows prediction of CMV related disease in liver transplant recipients

AIM: To identify cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in liver transplant recipients by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques and to separate the cases in which CMV related disease will occur, for whom treatment is indicated, from those in whom infection will remain innocuous. METHODS: The combination of qualitative and semiquantitative PCR of serum and urine was assessed to determine whether these assays can identify those at risk of CMV related disease and compared their performance with conventional approaches to diagnosis. RESULTS: Qualitative PCR of serum had superior specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values compared with urine DEAFF (detection of early antigen fluorescent foci) and PCR of urine. All episodes of CMV related disease were associated with the presence of CMV DNA by PCR in serum or urine; CMV was detected before clinical onset in 70% and 60% of cases, respectively. The period over which CMV DNA could be detected was not correlated with CMV related disease. Both peak viral load and cumulative viral load estimated using a semiquantitative PCR method on serum samples positive by the qualitative method could be used to distinguish asymptomatic infection from CMV related disease with 100% specificity and sensitivity. In contrast semiquantitative PCR of urine was of little value. CONCLUSIONS: An approach based on PCR testing with a combination of qualitative and subsequently semiquantitative serum samples would improve the diagnosis of CMV infection and aid identification of those patients at risk of CMV related disease, allowing treatment to be targeted specifically.     

Low predictive value of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viral culture techniques were prospectively compared for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in blood samples from 24 liver transplant recipients. Nine patients had one or more episodes of viremia, seven of which were clinically symptomatic infections. All samples in which CMV was isolated by culture were positive by the PCR. However, the PCR result was also positive for one or more samples from 11 patients who never developed CMV-related symptoms. Although the PCR is a very sensitive technique for CMV detection in blood samples from liver transplant recipients, it is not useful as a marker of symptomatic CMV disease.     

Diagnostic value of quantitative PCR for adenovirus detection in stool samples as compared with antigen detection and cell culture in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Adenovirus (AdV) infections constitute a significant cause of morbidity and mortality during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Recent guidelines recommend repeated screening for AdV in whole blood (WB), with quantitative PCR (qPCR) as the reference standard. Despite pre-emptive antiviral treatment based on qPCR in WB, the mortality rate after disseminated AdV infection remains very high. The aim of our study was to advance early screening for AdV, using a standardized method, so as to enable the earlier initiation of antiviral treatment or adoptive immunotherapy. The diagnostic value of AdV DNA quantification in stool samples was investigated retrospectively and compared with antigen detection and cell culture in 21 patients with AdV infection, from 182 patients followed in the Transplant Unit of Nancy University Hospital Centre, including 18 patients with systemic infection. In 16/18 patients with positive AdV viraemia, AdV DNA was present in stool samples earlier than in WB (median, 42 days; range, 3–199 days), whereas both antigen detection and cell culture were still negative for 11/18 patients with systemic AdV infection. The course of AdV viral loads in stool samples was predictive of adenoviraemia (sensitivity, 89%). Very late and lethal AdV infections were observed in cord blood transplant recipients, and would have been detected much earlier with the use of qPCR on stool samples. This study confirmed that quantification of AdV in stool samples by qPCR is beneficial for the management of transplant recipients, with or without antigen detection.     

Comparative evaluation of three automated systems for DNA extraction in conjunction with three commercially available real-time PCR assays for quantitation of plasma Cytomegalovirus DNAemia in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

Limited data are available on the performance of different automated extraction platforms and commercially available quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) methods for the quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in plasma. We compared the performance characteristics of the Abbott mSample preparation system DNA kit on the m24 SP instrument (Abbott), the High Pure viral nucleic acid kit on the COBAS AmpliPrep system (Roche), and the EZ1 Virus 2.0 kit on the BioRobot EZ1 extraction platform (Qiagen) coupled with the Abbott CMV PCR kit, the LightCycler CMV Quant kit (Roche), and the Q-CMV complete kit (Nanogen), for both plasma specimens from allogeneic stem cell transplant (Allo-SCT) recipients (n = 42) and the OptiQuant CMV DNA panel (AcroMetrix). The EZ1 system displayed the highest extraction efficiency over a wide range of CMV plasma DNA loads, followed by the m24 and the AmpliPrep methods. The Nanogen PCR assay yielded higher mean CMV plasma DNA values than the Abbott and the Roche PCR assays, regardless of the platform used for DNA extraction. Overall, the effects of the extraction method and the QRT-PCR used on CMV plasma DNA load measurements were less pronounced for specimens with high CMV DNA content (>10,000 copies/ml). The performance characteristics of the extraction methods and QRT-PCR assays evaluated herein for clinical samples were extensible at cell-based standards from AcroMetrix. In conclusion, different automated systems are not equally efficient for CMV DNA extraction from plasma specimens, and the plasma CMV DNA loads measured by commercially available QRT-PCRs can differ significantly. The above findings should be taken into consideration for the establishment of cutoff values for the initiation or cessation of preemptive antiviral therapies and for the interpretation of data from clinical studies in the Allo-SCT setting.     

Relationship of cytomegalovirus load assessed by real-time PCR to pp65 antigenemia in organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromised patients can lead to viremia associated with morbidity and mortality. Monitoring of viral loads in blood is critical for initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. OBJECTIVES: Validate quantitative real-time PCR assay targeting the US17 and UL54 regions of the CMV genome for automated DNA and extraction and amplification. STUDY DESIGN: 3422 blood specimens from organ transplant recipients, including longitudinal specimens from 12 organ transplant recipients, were tested by CMV PCR and pp65 antigenemia. RESULTS: CMV PCR for both US17 and UL54, was more sensitive and detected CMV DNA earlier and for longer than the CMV pp65 antigenemia test. Using antigenemia results as a reference standard, an optimal cutoff of 500 normalized copies was calculated for both US17 and UL54 PCR targets based on high sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. CMV DNA levels tracked well with clinical symptoms, response to treatment, and antigenemia. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of persistent increases in CMV DNA levels above 500 normalized copies by this real-time PCR assay is indicative of symptomatic CMV disease in organ transplant recipients. Quantitative real-time PCR for CMV DNA can be used in lieu of antigenemia for monitoring CMV infection and determining when to initiate preemptive treatment.     

Analysis of a quantitative PCR assay for CMV infection in liver transplant recipients: an intent to find the optimal cut-off value.

BACKGROUND: Preemptive therapy required highly predictive tests for CMV disease. CMV antigenemia assay (pp65 Ag) has been commonly used for rapid diagnosis of CMV infection. Amplification methods for early detection of CMV DNA are under analysis. OBJECTIVES: To compare two diagnostic methods for CMV infection and disease in this population: quantitative PCR (qPCR) performed in two different samples, plasma and leukocytes (PMNs) and using a commercial diagnostic test (COBAS Amplicor Monitor Test) versus pp65 Ag. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study conducted in liver transplant recipients from February 2000 to February 2001. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 164 samples collected weekly during early post-transplant period from 33 patients. Agreements higher than 78% were observed between the three assays. Optimal qPCR cut-off values were calculated using ROC curves for two specific antigenemia values. For antigenemia >or=10 positive cells, the optimal cut-off value for qPCR in plasma was 1330 copies/ml, with a sensitivity (S) of 58% and a specificity (E) of 98% and the optimal cut-off value for qPCR-cells was 713 copies/5x10(6) cells (S:91.7% and E:86%). Using a threshold of antigenemia >or=20 positive cells, the optimal cut-off values were 1330 copies/ml for qPCR-plasma (S 87%; E 98%) and 4755 copies/5x10(6) cells for qPCR-cells (S 87.5%; E 98%). Prediction values for the three assays were calculated in patients with CMV disease (9 pts; 27%). Considering the assays in a qualitative way, the most sensitive was CMV PCR in cells (S: 100%, E: 54%, PPV: 40%; NPV: 100%). Using specific cut-off values for disease detection the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for antigenemia >or=10 positive cells were: 89%; 83%; 67%; 95%, respectively. For qPCR-cells >or=713 copies/5x10(6) cells: 100%; 54%; 33% and 100% and for plasma-qPCR>or=1330 copies/ml: 78%, 77%, 47%, 89% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal cut-off for viral load performed in plasma and cells can be obtained for the breakpoint antigenemia value recommended for initiating preemptive therapy with high specificities and sensitivities. Diagnostic assays like CMV pp65 Ag and quantitative PCR for CMV have similar efficiency and could be recommended as methods of choice for diagnosis and monitoring of active CMV infection after transplantation.