Lamivudine monoprophylaxis for de novo HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients with HBcAb-positive liver grafts

We followed the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy in preventing development of de novo hepatitis B (DNHB) in a large cohort of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors. Recipients were observed over a long follow-up. Between July 1999 and December 2008, 45 patients (median age 54, range 19-67) who were HBsAg negative before transplantation were included in the study of monoprophylaxis with lamivudine starting on post-operative day 1, and continuing for life. Mean follow-up: 37.9 months; median 32.1 months (range 2.4-117). No suspension of therapy was reported during the study. Post-transplantation, no DNHB was observed in follow-up: all 45 HBsAg-negative recipients remained HBsAg and HBV DNA negative. Thirty-four of these HBsAg-negative recipients were alive at conclusion of the study. A total of 11 patients died, five of HCV recurrence, two of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence, two of disseminated KSV infection, and two of multiorgan failure because of early graft dysfunction. Patient and graft survival of HBsAg-negative recipients with HBcAb-positive donor grafts (45 cases) were not significantly different from those of the HBsAg-negative recipients with HBcAb-negative donor grafts (302 cases). In our experience, lamivudine monoprophylaxis provided complete protection against HBV reactivation and showed long-term efficacy.     

Long-term lamivudine monotherapy prevents development of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface-antigen negative liver transplant recipients from hepatitis B core-antibody-positive donors

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from hepatitis B core-antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been associated with a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy to prevent development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: From 315 cadaveric adult liver transplantations performed at our unit between July 1999 and March 2005, 18 recipients (5.7%) received liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors, 13 of whom were HBsAg-negative pre-transplantation. The recipients consisted of four females and 14 males, age range 28-65 yr (median 49.5 yr). Post-transplantation, HBsAg-negative recipients were administered lamivudine 100 mg daily long term. HBsAg-positive recipients were administered low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine according to our usual protocol. Standard post-transplantation immunosuppression was given. Recipients were followed up regularly (range 2-69 months, median 21 months) for development of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS: Ten HBsAg-negative recipients received long-term lamivudine. One patient (HBcAb and HBsAb positive pre-transplant) did not receive lamivudine and, in two patients, lamivudine was discontinued following urgent re-transplantation for primary graft non-function. All 13 of the HBsAg-negative recipients were still alive, with no evidence of HBV infection at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Long-term lamivudine monotherapy was effective in preventing development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative liver transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Failure of reactivation of hepatitis B after liver transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative, core antibody-positive recipients

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation may occur in patients previously not exposed to the virus, but who receive an organ from a surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donor. The risk of HBV reactivation after liver transplantation in recipients that are HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive requires definition, because reactivation in kidney and bone marrow transplant patients has occurred. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 409 HBsAg-negative patients underwent transplantation between April 1994 and June 1999. Pretransplantation sera were tested subsequently for HBcAb and HBsAb and posttransplantation sera for HBsAg. RESULTS: Of the 55 recipients who were positive for HBcAb, 48, who were immunosuppressed predominantly using tacrolimus, showed no evidence of HBV reactivation as shown by the absence of HBsAg (mean follow up 21.3+/-13.5 months). The remaining seven died within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, HBV reactivation did not occur in HBsAg-negative, HBcAb-positive recipients after liver transplantation, most of whom were immunosuppressed with tacrolimus. We would not, therefore, currently recommend HBV prophylaxis in these patients.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation in simultaneously hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus RNA positive recipients: the deleterious effect of donor hepatitis B core antibody positivity

Background

Recent data from Italian studies have shown excellent results of liver transplantation (LT) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)—positive donors, whereas such grafts in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients have displayed poorer outcomes. We investigated the results of LT with HBcAb-positive grafts in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfections.

Methods

From August 1999 to December 2009, we performed 27 adult primary LTs from deceased heart-beating donors into recipients showing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and HCV-RNA-positivity simultaneously: 12 patients received a graft from an HBsAg-negative HBcAb-positive donor (core+D group) and 15 from an HBcAb-negative donor (core−D group). Immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite and steroids which were suspended at 6 months. Anti-HBV prophylaxis was always perfomed with anti-HBs immunoglobulins and nucleos(t)idic analogues.

Results

The groups were similar regarding variables of donor, recipient, donor-recipient match, LT procedure, and acute rejection treatment. Median follow-up for surviving grafts was 67 months (range, 16-141). Among all patients, HCV-RNA remained positive after LT. The prevalence of histologically proven recurrent HCV hepatitis was similar in the 2 groups: 83% core+D vs 73% core−D. No recurrent HBV hepatitis occurred during the follow-up. Graft survival at 5 years was significantly lower in the core+D group (core+D 48% vs core−D 87%; P = .018), in which a significantly higher prevalence of graft loss was caused by HCV recurrence (core+D 5/12, 42% vs core−D 1/15, 7%; P = .03). All of the 5 core+D patients who lost their grafts due to HCV recurrence did not receive anti-HCV therapy (4 owing to an aggressive disease and 1 because of patient refusal).

Conclusions

Outcomes of LT in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfection are adversely affected by donor HBcAb positivity, an effect that is mainly mediated by the dismal course of HCV recurrence after LT.     

Safe use of livers from donors with positive hepatitis B core antibody

Thirty-five patients received liver transplants using liver donors who had positive test results for the hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). In the same time frame, 195 patients received HBcAb-negative liver donors. Mean follow up for patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors was 25 months. All patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors were monitored for recurrence of hepatitis B (HBV) with HBV DNA assays. There was no de novo HBV in recipients of HBcAb-negative grafts. In the group of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors, 4 of 35 patients died within 3 months after transplant with no evidence of HBV recurrence at time of death. Four patients were transplanted for HBV-related disease and were postoperatively placed on lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). HBV recurrence was seen in one of these patients. Of the remaining 27 patients, three of three mismatched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-negative recipient) developed de novo HBV (100%). Of 24 matched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-positive recipient), only two (7%) developed recurrent HBV allograft reinfection. All de novo and recurrent HBV infections were successfully managed with HBIG and lamivudine therapy. Survival for this subgroup of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors for non-HBV–related liver disease was 100%. We conclude that the judicious use of HBcAb-positive donors is reasonably safe and associated with low morbidity and mortality, with the appropriate follow-up protocols. Additionally, lamivudine use can be reserved for those cases with de novo or recurrent HBV in the liver allograft, or, selectively, as prophylaxis in those recipients patients who are naı̈ve to HBV and receive an HBcAb-positive donor. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:556-561.)     

The clinical outcome of hepatitis C virus antibody-positive renal allograft recipients.

In order to investigate the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in renal transplant patients, the evolution of anti-HCV status, and clinical outcome in anti-HCV-positive renal allograft recipients, we tested the sera from 120 renal transplant patients for anti-HCV. Thirty-eight patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive. Two patients were anti-delta-positive. A total of 79 patients (65.8%) had at least one serum positive for anti-HCV. Anti-HCV positivity decreased after transplantation for more than 5 years (65.5% at transplantation versus 37.9%, 78.3 +/- 13.4 months later). Among those with positive anti-HCV, the HBsAg-positive group had significantly higher incidence of chronic hepatitis (50% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.026) and liver cirrhosis (21.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.001) than HBsAg-negative group. Among the 82 HBsAg-negative patients, the prevalence of anti-HCV was significantly higher in those with chronic hepatitis than in those without (86.7% vs. 56.7%, P = 0.027). We conclude from this study: (1) anti-HCV positivity is quite prevalent in renal transplant patients; (2) coinfection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) may lead to aggressive liver disease and cirrhosis; HCV infection alone has a more benign clinical outcome; and (3) HCV infection is an important cause of posttransplant chronic hepatitis in HBsAg-negative patients.     

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive liver allograft in hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative recipients with use of short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and Lamivudine

INTRODUCTION: With the shortage of donor organs, increasing number of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive [HBcAb(+)] liver allografts are being used for liver transplantation (LTx) in patients who are HBcab-negative [HBsAb(-)]. This study was aimed at assessing outcomes for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive [HCV(+)] and HCV-negative [HCV(-)] patients who received HBcAb(+) liver grafts from deceased donors and also received a short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) with long-term lamivudine therapy after LTx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1995 through February 2003, 28 patients (mean age 53.8 +/- 10.2 years, 19 men and nine women, 16 HCV[-]; 12 HCV[+]) received HbcAb(+) liver allografts. All recipients received a short course of HBIg prophylaxis (10,000 units/day for 4 days) and long-term lamivudine 100 mg/d after LTx in addition to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: Seven (25%) of the 28 recipients died during follow-up and three recipients required retransplantation. Three recipients (10.7%) developed HBV infection during follow-up, one of whom died 36 months after LTx and the other two had YMDD mutant HBV. The overall 6-year actuarial patient survival after transplantation was 74.4% and those for HCV(-) and HCV(+) recipients were 81.3% and 66.6%, respectively (P = .46). The overall 6-year actuarial graft survival was 63.9% and those for HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients were 68.8% and 57.1%, respectively (P = .6). CONCLUSION: We conclude that HBcAb(+) liver grafts can be used for both HCV(+) patients and HCV(-) patients who are critically ill, have early hepatocellular carcinoma, or have been exposed to HBV in the past. A short course of HBIg-lamivudine combination therapy provides effective prophylaxis against HBV infection in 89% of recipients of HBcAb(+) grafts.     

Hepatitis viral status in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B and C viruses are the main causative agents of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The influence of hepatitis viral status on liver resection for HCC remains undetermined. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for HCC were divided into four groups: group 1, seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antihepatitis C antibody (HCVAb); group 2, seropositive for HBsAg only; group 3, seropositive for HCVAb only; and group 4, seropositive for HBsAg and HCVAb. The clinicopathological characteristics and surgical results of the four groups were compared. Resection of HCC was determined according to liver functional reserve and tumour extent. RESULTS: There were 40, 131, 70 and 20 patients in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Due to patient selection bias, there were significant differences in some background features, resectional extent and pathological characteristics among the four groups. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as the Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum tumour node metastasis stages, did not differ. Patients in group 1 had a higher disease-free survival rate than those in group 2 (P = 0. 02). The actuarial survival rates of patients in groups 2 and 4 were lower than those of groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: With careful patient selection, the hepatitis viral status does not influence the surgical risks of hepatectomy for HCC. After liver resection for HCC, the long-term survival rate of patients seronegative for HBsAg is greater than that of patients seropositive for HBsAg.     

Fibrosis in non-cancerous tissue is the unique prognostic factor for primary hepatocellular carcinoma without hepatitis B or C viral infection

Background: The relationship between the state of non-cancerous tissues in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), and hepatitis C antibody (HCVAb) (NBNC-HCC) and the prognosis has not yet been resolved. Methods: We examined the clinicopathological features of these patients and performed statistical analysis for the prognosis of recurrence following curative hepatic resection. Results: Disease-free survival (DFS) revealed that only the degree of fibrosis was a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.0374). On the basis of the degree of fibrosis (New Inuyama Classification), patients with NBNC-HCC were divided into a non-fibrotic liver group (NF group; F0, n = 10) and a fibrotic liver group (FL group; F1–4, n = 34). The DFS rate in the NF group was significantly better than that in the FL group (P = 0.0408). In the NF group, only one patient recurred, while in the FL group, 21 patients had recurrences. In the FL group, intra-hepatic recurrence was frequently seen in both lobes within 2 years after the initial hepatic resection, while recurrences more than 2 years after the initial operation were mainly seen in the contralateral lobe. Conclusion: Histological assessment of the degree of fibrosis in the non-cancerous regions of NBNC-HCC may be useful not only for the selection of the appropriate treatment but also for the prediction of postoperative prognosis.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors in viral cirrhosis patients: the prevailing negative effect of recipient hepatitis C virus infection

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors has been the object of recent studies, suggesting different outcomes depending on the etiology of viral cirrhosis in the recipient.

Methods

From November 2002 to December 2009, we transplanted 124 livers from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative HBcAb-positive deceased heart-beating donors to adult recipients with viral cirrhosis, classified as: HBsAg positive (group 1; n = 63); hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA positive (group 2; n = 52); and simultaneously HBsAg and HCV-RNA positive (group 3; n = 9). Immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate, and steroids (tapered to suspension in 6 months). In all groups, anti-HBV prophylaxis was performed with anti-HBs immunoglobulins and nucleos(t)idic analogues.

Results

The groups were similar regarding donor, recipient, donor-recipient match, transplant procedure, variables, and treatment of acute rejection, except for younger recipient age in group 1 (P = .009), lower recipient body mass index in group 3 (P = .03), and longer cold ischemia time in group 2 (P = .003). Median follow-up for surviving grafts was 63 (range, 16-102) months. No case of recurrent or de novo hepatitis B occurred. The prevalence of histologically proven recurrent HCV hepatitis was similar in groups 2 and 3 (65% vs 78%). Graft survival at 5 years was 86% in group 1, 35% in group 2, and 31% in group 3 (P < .0001 for group 1 vs 2; P < .01 for group 1 vs 3). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of worse graft survival were HCV infection in the recipient (HR 8.08, 95% CI 3.36-17.97; P < .0001) and MELD at LT ≥25 (HR 3.72, 95% CI 1.12-12.37; P = .032).

Conclusions

The presence of HCV infection in the recipient is the factor which most negatively influenced the outcome of LT using grafts from HBcAb-positive donors. Allocation of such grafts should consider the type of viral cirrhosis among LT candidates.     

Hepatitis B core antibody positive donors as a safe and effective therapeutic option to increase available organs for lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: The use of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb+) and hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab+) positive donors represents one strategy to increase available donor organs, but this remains controversial because of concern for viral transmission to recipients. We hypothesized that isolated HBcAb+ donors represent minimal risk of viral transmission in vaccinated lung transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of LTx recipients who received HBcAb+ or HCV Ab+ pulmonary allografts. We analyzed liver function studies, viral hepatitis screening tests, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for hepatitis B viral DNA (HBV DNA) and hepatitis C viral RNA (HCV RNA), freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, acute rejection, and survival. RESULTS: Between April 1992 and August 2003, 456 LTx operations were performed. Twenty-nine patients (HB group) received HBcAb+ allograft transplants with a median posttransplant follow-up of 24.5 months. Three critically ill patients (HC group) received HCV Ab+ allografts with a median follow-up of 21.5 months. One-year survival for the HB group is 83% versus 82% for all patients who received non-HB organs (P=0.36). No patient in the HB group developed clinical liver disease because of viral hepatitis, and all patients alive (n=21) at follow-up are, to date, HBV DNA and/or HBcAb negative. All patients in the HC group tested HCV RNA positive; one patient died of liver failure at 22 months. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of viral transmission with HCV Ab+ allografts seems high after LTx. However, the use of HBcAb+ pulmonary allografts in recipients with prior hepatitis B vaccination seems to be a safe and effective strategy to increase organ availability.     

Kidney transplantation from hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive donors: prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin

Objective

Hepatitis B virus core antibody (HBcAb)-positive organ donors have the potential to transmit infection to transplant recipients.

Patients and Methods

We investigated the use of a single dose of 2000 IU of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in 18 patients among a population of 54 kidney transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive deceased donors.

Results

Twelve recipients were HBcAb-positive before transplantation. Among the other 42 patients, 5 (11.9%) seroconverted from HBcAb-negative to HBcAb-positive, whereas one HBcAb-positive recipient became hepatitis B virus surface antigen-positive with clinical signs of active hepatitis 6 years after transplantation. In the 18 patients who underwent prophylaxis, we did not find any seroconversion or hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission. Graft and patient survival of HBcAb-positive kidney transplants did not differ significantly with a matched population of HBcAb-negative transplantation.

Conclusion

These results suggest that kidney transplantation from HBcAb-positive donors is safe with a low rate of HBV transmission. A prophylaxis with a single shot of hepatitis B immunoglobulin may be effective in reducing the risk of HBV seroconversion or reactivation and may be suggested in all naïve or HBcAb-positive transplant recipients.     

基于乙肝表面抗原表达的973例早期肝细胞癌预后分析

目的 分析早期肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)患者的病因及临床资料,探索病因和预后之间的关系。方法 回顾性分析2012年1月1日至2019年12月31日于首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院初次接受经肝动脉栓塞化疗(TACE)的973例早期HCC患者的临床及预后资料。描述肝癌患者病因谱,比较具有不同病因的患者的临床资料,并通过Kaplan-Meier曲线和Log-rank检验比较其无复发生存期(recurrence-free survival,RFS)和总生存期(overall survival,OS)的差异。结果 973例早期肝细胞癌患者中乙肝和丙肝病毒感染相关肝癌占97.2%(946/973),非病毒相关肝癌仅占2.8%(27/973)。在乙肝相关肝癌和联合感染相关肝癌患者中,有14.8%(140/946)为HBsAg阴性,联合感染患者中HBsAg阴性情况较乙肝相关肝癌更为常见[80.2%(77/96)和7.9%(63/798)]。截止随访时间2021年7月1日,无肝炎患者(n=63)和单纯乙肝病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)感染患者(...     

Safety of using hepatitis B virus core antibody or surface antigen-positive donors in kidney or pancreas transplantation

Hepatitis B virus core antibody (HBcAb) or surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive organ donors have the potential to transmit infection to transplant recipients. We investigated the safety of using HBcAb(+) or HBsAg(+) donors in kidney or pancreas transplant recipients with 1 yr lamivudine prophylaxis. While HBsAb(-) recipients of HBcAb(+) donors received prophylaxis, HBsAb(+) recipients did not. HBsAg(+) organs were only used in patients who were both HBcAb and HBsAb(+). Forty-six patients received HBcAb(+) and four received HBsAg(+) organs (47 kidney, two pancreas, and one kidney/pancreas). All but one recipient were HBsAg(-), 25 were HBsAb(+), and 19 HBcAb(+). During a median 36 months of follow-up (range 6-66 months), with 43 of a total 50 patients having at least 1 yr follow-up and were off lamivudine, and none of the patients developed hepatitis B viremia or seroconversion to HBsAg or HBsAb(+). These results suggest that HBcAb(+) or HBsAg(+) organs can be used safely in selected recipients with lamivudine prophylaxis without requiring hepatitis B immunglobulin.     

Donor pool expansion in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: The shortage of donors has made it necessary to consider older subjects, those with mild or moderate steatosis, and those who are HBcAb- or hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive as marginal donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1986 to January 2002, 690 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) were performed in 603 patients. In this series we used 68 donors older than 70 years, 51 with steatosis (38 mild, 12 moderate, and 1 severe), 44 were HBcAb-positive and 6 were HCV-positive. RESULTS: Of 68 grafts from donors older than 70 years, 65 were used as a first OLT. These grafts showed 3 PNF, 11 arterial complications, 12 re-OLTs, and 14 deaths with graft survival of 72.3% and 61.34% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. All patients who received the other 3 grafts, which were used for re-OLT, died between postoperative day 21 and 720. Among the 51 grafts with steatosis, we observed 2 PNF of those within the mild steatosis group and graft survival rates of 76.8% and 70.9% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Forty-four grafts from HBcAb-positive subjects were used in 18 HBsAg-negative and 26 HBsAg-positive recipients. Among the untreated patient group, 1 patient demonstrated hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection and 1 patient had de-novo HBV. No reinfection or de novo infections were observed in the 13 patients treated with immunoglobulin or in the 19 patients treated with lamivudine plus immunoglobulin, or in the only patient treated with lamivudine. Graft survival rates were 64.1% and 54.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Among who received 6 patients transplants from HCV-positive donors, we observed 1 recurrence of chronic hepatitis, 1 re-OLT for hepatic vein stenosis, and 1 PNF. CONCLUSION: Old donors, those with moderate steatosis, or those who are HBcAb- and HCV-positive can be safely used in selected recipients to reduce waiting list mortality.     

Surgical results in patients with hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan

To investigate the surgical results of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to hepatitis virus status in Taiwan, 252 patients (196 men and 56 women; March 1992 to August 1998) were reviewed. The patients were divided into four groups: 30 patients (11.9%) seronegative for both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antihepatitis C antibody (HCVAb) (N-HCC group); 133 patients (52.8%) seropositive for HBsAg and seronegative for HCVAb (B-HCC group); 66 patients (26.2%) seronegative for HBsAg and seropositive for HCVAb (C-HCC group); and 23 patients (9.1%) seropositive for both HBsAg and HCVAb (BC-HCC group). Patients in group C-HCC were older (p = 0.001) and had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004). Also, they had a higher indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (p = 0.021), longer international normalization ratio for the prothrombin time (p = 0.049), and smaller tumor (p = 0.006). Postoperative complications and hospital mortality were significantly higher in patients in the C-HCC and BC-HCC groups (p = 0.046, 0.021). All patients were followed 12 to 76 months after hepatectomy (mean 23.5 +/- 16.3 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall cumulative survival rates of the 252 patients in this series were 80%, 54.3%, and 34.2%, respectively. The cumulative intrahepatic recurrence rates were 46.5%, 64.9%, and 72.9% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The mean disease-free survival time was longest in group C-HCC and shortest in group BC-HCC (p = 0.020). The overall survival time and cumulative survival rates in the four groups were not significantly different (p = 0.146).     

Hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients

Sera from 130 renal transplant recipients were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). Anti-HCV was detected in 6.2% of patients: 15.4% of patients who had maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 2.2% of those who had continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) before transplantation (P less than 0.05). The similarity in prevalence of anti-HCV with patients currently on dialysis and the absence of transfusion during posttransplant follow-up suggest that most patients acquired HCV infection through transfusion during dialysis. The proportion of anti-HCV-positive patients who had one or more episodes of elevation in serum transaminase level was similar to that of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients, 75% vs. 72.2%. However, anti-HCV was only detected in 25% of HBsAg-negative patients who had recurrent elevations in serum transaminase level. It is not clear whether the low prevalence of anti-HCV in these patients is related to the presence of other non-A, non-B hepatitis virus (es) or a decrease in titer of anti-HCV secondary to immunosuppression posttransplantation.     

Hepatitis C virus infection in chronic haemodialysis patients, a clinicopathologic study.

Fifty-two patients on regular haemodialysis at our institution were evaluated for the presence of HCV infection. Evaluation included detailed history, clinical examination, and monthly screening for anti-HCV antibody, liver enzymes (ALT, AST), serum iron and ferritin. Also, three-monthly screening for other viral markers, HBV (HBsAg, HBsAb, HBcAb), CMV (IgG and IgM), EBV, and HIV. Anti-HCV antibody was found in 21 patients (40.4%). There was a significant (P less than 0.05) relationship between presence of anti-HCV antibody and proportion of patients who received blood transfusion. During a 12-month follow-up, four (11.4%) patients seroconverted to be Anti-HCV positive while one case (4.8%) seroconverted to be anti-HCV negative. The frequency of elevation of liver enzymes was significantly higher in Anti-HCV positive cases (14/18) than in negative cases (11/28, P = 0.01). Evaluation of liver biopsies of 13 patients showed chronic persistent hepatitis in six and chronic active hepatitis in seven cases. We concluded that hepatitis C is a common problem among chronic haemodialysis patients at our institution; HCV infection is documented in 70% of all clinically diagnosed NANB hepatitis. Presence of anti-HCV antibodies cannot differentiate between active and past infection and cases with early HCV infection can be missed when relying on the mere detection of anti-HCV antibodies.     

The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on liver disease in renal transplant recipients

Abstract To assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients and its impact on posttransplant liver disease, the sera from 176 recipients who had been followed for 1–20 years (mean 8.3 years) were tested for HCV-pecific antibody using enzyme immunoassay. HCV-pecific antibody was detected in 53 patients (30.1%) including 2 patients also positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Among 167 HBsAg-negative patients, the presence of HCV-pecific antibody was associated with an increased incidence of chemically significant hepatitis (70.6% vs. 9.5% in anti-HCV-negative patients, P<0.01). Hepatitis was more likely to be chronic in anti-HCV-positive patients than in anti-HCV-negative patients (P<0.05) Serious liver disease developed in 4 of 51 anti-HCV-positive, HBsAg-negative patients: liver failure causing death in 3 and hepatoma in 1. Liver biopsy specimens from anti-HCV-positive patients showed more aggressive histological lesions compared with those from anti-HCV-negative patients. We conclude that HCV infection is quite prevalent in our renal transplant recipients and plays a major role in posttransplant chronic liver disease.