Prosthetic iris implantation for congenital, traumatic, or functional iris deficiencies.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of surgical implantation of prosthetic iris devices in patients with anatomic or functional iris deficiencies. SETTING: Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in an interventional prospective noncomparative case series. Twenty-eight eyes had prosthetic iris diaphragm implantation for traumatic iris defects, congenital aniridia or iris coloboma, herpetic iris atrophy, surgical iris loss, or ocular albinism. Prosthetic iris implantation was performed with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in 20 eyes, secondary IOL implantation in 6 eyes, and IOL exchange in 1 eye. A single pseudophakic eye with disabling glare secondary to traumatic aniridia had secondary prosthetic iris implantation alone. The surgical ease of insertion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative anatomic results, visual acuity, and subjective glare reduction were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients were followed postoperatively for a mean of 10.2 months (range 1.4 to 25.7 months). All eyes achieved the desired anatomic result. Visual acuity was improved in 22 of 28 eyes (79%), unchanged in 5 eyes, and worsened by a single line in 1 eye. Patients were surveyed postoperatively to determine the change in glare disability. The severity of glare disability was subjectively improved in 23 of 24 patients (96%) who responded to the survey. Intraoperative complications included 3 fractured implants as well as an incomplete or torn capsulorhexis in 3 eyes. Postoperative complications included transient hypotony in 2 eyes, mild persistent inflammation in 1 eye, and macular edema followed by a retinal detachment in 1 eye with recent severe trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of prosthetic iris devices improved postoperative outcomes by reducing glare disability and, in selected cases, by correcting aphakia. Although operating on traumatized, congenitally aniridic, or uveitic eyes presents special challenges, implantation of prosthetic iris devices appears to be a safe and effective method for reducing the ubiquitous glare in patients with iris deficiency.     

Black diaphragm intraocular lens implantation in aphakic eyes with traumatic aniridia and previous pars plana vitrectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of secondary black diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in aphakic eyes with traumatic aniridia and previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). SETTING: Shandong Eye Institute and Hospital, Qingdao, China. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 15 aphakic eyes with aniridia and no vitreous that had implantation of a secondary black diaphragm IOL 6 to 72 months after PPV. The PPV was performed as a result of trauma to the posterior segment. Before implantation of the IOL, all patients had reduced visual acuity from aphakia and intolerable glare from aniridia. Eyes were aphakic as a result of previous extracapsular cataract extraction (1 eye), lens extrusion during trauma (3 eyes), or simultaneous cataract lensectomy during PPV (11 eyes). Significant iris defects were present, with 9 eyes being aniridic after the injury. The mean follow-up was 17 months (range 3 to 34 months). The postoperative visual acuity, intra- ocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density, IOL centration, and intraocular inflammation were monitored. RESULTS: All 15 eyes had improved visual acuity and marked glare reduction after IOL implantation. No major IOL decentration was seen. Five patients had increased IOP 3 to 5 days after IOL implantation; 3 were known to have secondary glaucoma from trauma before surgery and their IOP was controlled preoperatively (< 21 mm Hg) with timolol 0.5% eyedrops. The other 2 patients had normal- appearing angles, and 1 was diagnosed with hemolytic glaucoma after IOL insertion. Postoperative elevated IOP was controlled by timolol eyedrops (4 eyes) or selective laser trabeculoplasty (1 eye). Hyphema was seen in 1 patient on the first day after IOL implantation, but no further bleeding was noted. Vitreous hemorrhage was seen the first day after IOL insertion in 2 patients. One resolved without sequelae; the other required vitreous washout. Retinal detachment and cystoid macular edema did not occur in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Black diaphragm IOL implantation can be considered in eyes with coexisting aphakia and aniridia and without vitreous. Intraoperative IOP regulation is crucial in vitrectomized eyes to prevent complications such as expulsive hemorrhage. In general, visual function was better after IOL insertion as a result of better visual acuity and glare reduction. Although this IOL appears to be safe, long-term results must be assessed in studies with a longer follow-up and a larger study group.     

儿童带虹膜隔人工晶状体植入术的临床应用

目的：探讨带虹膜隔人工晶状体在儿童内障术后的应用。方法：对12例（12只眼）伴无虹膜或虹膜缺损的先天性或外伤性白内障儿童施行白内障注吸术和带虹膜隔人工晶状体植入术。结果：随访平均4．33月,所有病例的视力都较术前有所改善,其中8眼（66．675）的矫正视力≥0．1,最好者达0．6。术后并发症视网膜脱离1眼,严重色素膜炎2眼,人工晶状体移位3眼。结论带虹膜隔人工晶状体植入术是儿童无虹膜或虹膜缺损眼白内障术后的一种有铲的矫正无晶状体眼的方法。     

Aniridie-Intraokularlinsen bei Augen mit traumatischen Irisdefekten

BACKGROUND: Globe injuries frequently are the cause of permanent loss of visual function. Especially ruptures of the globe have a 50 times lower chance of achieving a final visual acuity better than 20/200 as compared to contusions of the globe. Besides injury to the retina and choroids, injury of the iris-lens diaphragm plays an important role for visual rehabilitation (10% iris defects and 1% aniridia after blunt trauma). Against this background the surgical results after implantation of aniridia intraocular lenses were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (41.9+/-19.6 years of age) after globe injury (three ruptures of the globe, eight penetrating injuries with trauma of the iris) were implanted with an aniridia IOL. RESULTS: The implantation of an aniridia IOL was performed on average 1.0+/-0.6 years (range: 0.4-2.3 years) after the primary injury. In ten eyes an aniridia IOL model HMK ANI 2 (Ophtec/Polytech) was implanted and in one eye an aniridia IOL model 67 (Morcher). Most patients were very satisfied with the results achieved (average corrected visual acuity 0.48; 0.05-1.0). Of the operated eyes, 63% reached a visual acuity >/=0.4. All patients noticed a significant reduction in glare disability as compared to the preoperative condition. The incidence of secondary glaucoma remained unchanged after the secondary implantation. One patient demonstrated retinal detachment 3 months after receiving the secondary implant, which was successfully treated with vitrectomy and gas tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of aniridia IOLs seems to be a beneficial therapeutic option in post-traumatic eyes with partial or complete aniridia and aphakia with good visual recovery. During the postoperative follow-up special attention must be paid to sufficient regulation of intraocular pressure and to the retinal situation.     

Surgical management of iris defects with prosthetic iris devices

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgical implantation of prosthetic iris devices in patients with iris deficiency. METHODS: Nine patients with traumatic iris defects, congenital aniridia or iris coloboma, and surgical or optical iridectomies were included in a noncomparative case series. Cataract surgery with intraocular lens and prosthetic iris implantation was performed in 10 eyes. The visual acuity, subjective degree of glare disability, postoperative anatomic results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 17.75 months (range 4-48 months). Best-corrected visual acuity improved in nine of 10 eyes (90%) and remained unchanged in one eye. Glare subjectively improved in four of five eyes (80%) of patients complaining of glare preoperatively. All eyes achieved the desired anatomic result. Intraoperative complications included one anterior capsular tear. Postoperative complications included a short period of mild postoperative anterior uveitis in four eyes. Secondary glaucoma was absent. CONCLUSION: In patients with iris deficiency, implantation of prosthetic iris device, and intraocular lens implant following cataract surgery appears to be safe and effective in reducing glare disability and improving visual outcomes.     

Coreoplasty and Artisan Intraocular Lens Implantation for Mydriasis and Aphakic Correction in Post-traumatic Vitrectomized Eyes

 PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using coreoplasty, and an iris-supported Artisan intraocular lens (IOL), for mydriasis and aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eyes. METHODS: A total of 17 aphakic patients were admitted between April 2009 and April 2010 to the ophthalmologic department of Xiamen Eye Center. All eyes had previously received lens removal and vitrectomy. After the retina stabilized and corrected visual acuity improved, the iris was sutured. The Artisan IOL was fixated onto the iris surface. Patients were followed-up at one day, one week, one month and three months postoperatively. The following outcomes were assessed: symptoms of photophobia and glare, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD). The diameter of pupil and the anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured by the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: Artisan IOLs were successfully implanted in all aphakic eyes. Postoperatively, improvement was observed in photophobia and glare symptoms. UCVA was enhanced in all patients (six eyes had better UCVA postoperatively than BCVA preoperatively). However, there were no significant changes in IOP. Mean loss of ECD was 336.06/mm2. Mean postoperative pupil diameter was 3.67±0.41mm, compared with 5.67±0.57mm preoperatively (P<0.05). Mean ACD was reduced by 0.88mm (3.38±0.33mm preoperatively vs 2.50±0.35mm postoperatively, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgery that combined coreoplasty and Artisan IOL implantation was a safe and effective treatment for correcting aphakia and mydriasis in post-traumatic vitrectomized eyes.     

Implantation of a black diaphragm intraocular lens in ten cases of post-traumatic aniridia

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review the safety and efficacy of black-diaphragm intraocular lenses (IOL) implanted for the treatment of post-traumatic aniridia. METHODS: Ten patients (mean age 48 years, range 21-75) were implanted with a black-diaphragm posterior chamber IOL (Morcher GmbH, model 67F) for correction of post-traumatic aniridia associated with cataract or aphakia. This IOL, in poly(methylmethacrylate), consists of an opaque diaphragm surrounding the transparent optic, and was inserted through a 10-mm scleral tunnel (seven eyes) or through the corneal trephination in cases of simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty (three eyes), and in-the-sulcus implanted, trans-sclerally sutured (six eyes) or on capsular support (four eyes). Mean follow-up was 33.4 months (range 12-52). RESULTS: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in eight eyes and remained unchanged in two. Glare and photophobia decreased in all patients. Intraoperatively, ciliary sulcus bleeding occurred in two cases and haptic rupture during lens insertion in one. Postoperatively, persistent intraocular inflammation was seen in four eyes, secondary glaucoma in four eyes, transient hyphema and/or hemovitreous in four, IOL decentration in two, and post-traumatic haptic detachment in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: Although in our experience the haptics still seem weak and the diaphragm diameter too large, implantation of the black-diaphragm IOL type 67F appeared sufficiently safe and provided satisfactory functional results for correction of post-traumatic aniridia combined with cataract or aphakia, improving BCVA and reducing glare and photophobia in most patients, though clearly more cases and longer follow-up are needed to assess its clinical performance properly.     

Conductive keratoplasty to correct residual hyperopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability of conductive keratoplasty (CK) for correcting residual hyperopia after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Vissum-Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, and Vissum-Instituto de Albacete, Albacete, Spain. METHODS: Sixteen eyes of 16 patients had CK for the correction of residual hyperopia after cataract surgery. The CK was performed with the CK View Point Refractec (RCS-200, Refractec, Inc.). The follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: One year after CK, 10 eyes (62.5%) achieved an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 0.50 or better. The mean UCVA was 0.50 +/- 0.21 (SD), and the mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.68 +/- 0.24. One eye lost 1 line of BSCVA, and none lost 2 or more lines. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.39 +/- 0.84 D 1 year after CK. No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: One-year data show that CK for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia after cataract surgery was safe, stable, relatively predictable, and efficient. No complications occurred when CK was performed after phacoemulsification.     

Outcomes of prosthetic iris implantation in patients with albinism

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of implantation of prosthetic iris devices in patients with albinism. SETTING: Private practice, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. METHODS: This retrospective noncomparative case series comprised 13 eyes of 8 patients with diminished pigment epithelium of the iris secondary to albinism. All eyes had anterior segment surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) and prosthetic iris device implantation. Eleven eyes received an endocapsular-type iris reconstruction implant (Morcher aniridia interdigitating rings), and 2 eyes (1 patient) received a combined iris-IOL device (Ophtec model 311). The visual acuity, subjective glare reduction, postoperative anatomical outcomes, and intraoperative or postoperative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: All eyes achieved the desired anatomic result. The best corrected visual acuity improved in 8 of 13 eyes, remained stable in 3 eyes, and decreased in 2 eyes. Glare and photophobia improved subjectively in 6 of 8 patients, remained unchanged in 1 patient, and increased in 1 patient after implantation of an artificial iris diaphragm. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of prosthetic iris devices appears to be useful in the management of patients with iris deficiency secondary to albinism. The procedure was safe and particularly effective in reducing glare and photophobia in most patients.     

Black diaphragm aniridia intraocular lens for aniridia and albinism

Background Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of primary and secondary implantation of a black diaphragm aniridia intraocular lens (IOL) in patients that lacked a complete iris diaphragm.Methods This was a retrospective non-comparative study of six eyes in five patients with iris defects. The causes of such defects included congenital aniridia, traumatic aniridia, and oculocutaneous albinism. Three eyes underwent primary implantations of a black diaphragm IOL, and three eyes were given secondary implantations. The visual acuity, subjective severity of glare, postoperative anatomical outcome and any intraoperative or postoperative complications were reviewed.Results The mean follow-up period was 20.6 months (range 3–29 months). All patients showed stable or improvement in best-corrected visual acuity postoperatively. Glare and photophobia had improved subjectively in all patients after implantation of the black diaphragm IOL. Intraoperative complication included one case of hyphaema and iris damage during insertion of the IOL. Postoperative complications included intraocular inflammation with choroidal detachment, secondary glaucoma, and persistent epithelial defect after surgery. None of the patients developed decentration of IOL after surgery.Conclusion The black diaphragm aniridia IOL is useful in the management of the condition in patients with iris deficiency including oculocutaneous albinism. Intraoperative and postoperative complications are not uncommon, and patients should be monitored carefully in the perioperative period.     

Traumatic pediatric cataract: A decade of follow-up after Artisan aphakia intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To describe the long-term clinical outcome of Artisan((R)) aphakia intraocular lens (IOL; Ophtec, Groningen, The Netherlands) implantation in five aphakic eyes of five children, without capsular support, after cataract extraction following penetrating ocular trauma. METHODS: The charts of the five children were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included follow-up time, nature of injury, age at cataract extraction and IOL implantation, visual outcome, endothelial cell counts, complications, and subsequent surgical interventions. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 11.0 years (range, 8.0-14.6 years). All eyes had a corneal perforation with various degrees of anterior segment injury. Mean patient age at lens extraction was 7.8 years (range, 5.6-10.2 years). Mean age at Artisan aphakia IOL implantation was 7.9 years (range, 5.7-10.2 years). The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at last follow-up was 20/40 or better in four eyes. Mean endothelial cell loss compared with the healthy fellow eye was 40%. No patients experienced IOL dislocation, corneal decompensation, chronic anterior uveitis, cystoid macular edema, or iris atrophy. One eye had a retinal detachment 19 months after primary injury and needed vitreoretinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Artisan aphakia IOL offers a useful alternative for correction of traumatic childhood aphakia. Although we only have results of a small number of patients, taking into account our long follow-up period, we feel that implantation of the Artisan aphakia IOL can be considered a treatment option in aphakic eyes of children that lack capsular support due to trauma.     

Iris cerclage pupilloplasty and IOL implantation for traumatic mydriasis and aphakia after the blunt trauma of the eye

Four patients with traumatic mydriasis and aphakia following blunt injury of the eye globe were evaluated. Patients with severe glare and photophobia due to wide pupil diameter from 6.0 to 9.0 mm were managed by combined iris cerclage pupilloplasty and retropupillar iris-claw lens implantation. The postoperative anatomic results, visual acuity, subjective degree of glare, photophobia, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 32.6 months. Best-corrected visual acuity improved in all patients from preoperative 20/60, 20/30, 20/25, 20/22 to postoperative 20/20, 20/22, 20/20, and 20/20 (Snellen charts). All eyes achieved satisfactory anatomic result with round pupil diameter 3.5–4.5 mm. Glare and photophobia disappeared in all patients. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. During the follow-up period, pupils remained round and iris-claw lenses well positioned, without tilting. Combined iris cerclage pupilloplasty with retropupillar iris claw lens implantation appears to be a safe and effective surgical technique in reducing pupil size and improving visual outcomes. It is also a cost- and time-effective procedure, providing great results with a single surgery.     

The effect of moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin on long-term visual outcomes following photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin on visual outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Thirty-five PRK patients were treated postoperatively with gatifloxacin (Zymar) in one eye and moxifloxacin (Vigamox) in the fellow eye. Postoperative regimens were otherwise identical. In a previous study (initial phase), we evaluated epithelial healing. In this study (second phase), we compared uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest spherical equivalent (MSE), and corneal haze at 6 months postoperatively for 32 patients using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was noted between eyes treated with Zymar and Vigamox in terms of UCVA, BSCVA, MSE, or corneal haze at 6 months postoperatively. Two (6%) Vigamox-treated eyes versus 0 (0%) Zymar-treated eyes lost one line of BSCVA from preoperative examination. Median UCVA and MSE were equivalent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months after PRK, there was no significant difference in visual outcomes with either antibiotic.     

Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses

Purpose: To evaluate reading ability and stereoscopic vision with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: Thirty‐one cataract patients (62 eyes) were assigned to receive either a ReZoom NXG1 IOL in the dominant eye and a Tecnis ZM900 IOL in the fellow eye (MIOL group), or Sensar AR40e IOLs bilaterally (SIOL group). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at 500 cm, best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 500 cm, reading acuity, reading speed, near stereoacuity and questionnaire were assessed 3 months postoperatively. Results: Three months postoperatively, monocular and binocular UCVA and BSCVA at 500 cm showed no significant differences in both groups. The uncorrected reading acuity and reading speed in the MIOL group were significantly better than those in the SIOL group and were similar to that with correction in the SIOL group. The uncorrected mean near stereoacuity in the MIOL group was significantly better than that in the SIOL group (69 ± 50 seconds of arc in the MIOL group versus 180 ± 160 seconds of arc in the SIOL group). Patients in the MIOL group had a high level of satisfaction and more than 80% of them had an increased independence from spectacles for brief reading. Conclusion: The combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs was effective in improving reading ability and near stereoacuity with a good visual quality.     

Implantation of iris devices in congenital and traumatic aniridias: surgery solutions and complications

PURPOSE: To show surgical solutions in patients with traumatic and congenital aniridia, to evaluate the clinical improvement of these patients when iris prosthesis are implanted, and to examine safety and complications of these implants in a long-term follow-up. METHODS: Eight patients were included in this retrospective noncomparative case series. Nine eyes had an artificial iris implantation for traumatic or congenital aniridia. Three eyes received a black diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) in capsular bag after phacoemulsification. An aniridia prosthesis, sulcus sutured, in front of a previous IOL was implanted in two eyes. A black diaphragm IOL, sulcus sutured, in two eyes; two iris diaphragm rings, in front of the previous IOL, in one eye; and a sector iris prosthesis in front of an IOL in the last eye were implanted. Mean follow-up was 22.5 months (range 16 to 44 months). RESULTS: All patients had improved visual acuity (VA) and visual comfort after surgery. The glare disability was subjectively better in all cases. Two patients developed new ocular hypertension after surgery; one of them was controlled by medical treatment and the other needed cyclodiode. Two of the patients with glaucoma preoperatively also needed cyclodiode procedure and one of them an Ahmed valve. CONCLUSIONS: Several kinds of artificial iris implants are available. In all our patients with aniridia, iris artificial prostheses improved VA and diminished visual discomfort. Glaucoma is the most important complication after artificial iris implant. It is possible to implant the iris prosthesis in the capsular bag, but this requires a large capsulorrhexis and presents a surgical challenge.     

Retinal detachment and phthisis bulbi after implantation of an iris prosthetic system

We report 2 eyes of 2 patients who developed persistent inflammation, hypotony, and total retinal detachment after secondary implantation of an iris prosthetic system (IPS) in association with cataract surgery. The first patient had an uneventful history of 16 years despite a retained intraocular glass foreign body and the second patient, of 38 years after sustaining penetrating corneoscleral injury with iris tissue loss. Both patients were thoroughly assessed clinically, and the enucleated globe in the first patient was examined by light microscopy. Both eyes had chronic inflammation with retrocorneal and cyclitic membrane formation around the artificial iris-lens diaphragm. These cases suggest that implantation of an IPS combined with cataract surgery can trigger decompensation of posttraumatic eyes that had been stable over a long period.     

Correction of severe ectasia after LASIK with intracorneal ring segments

PURPOSE: To report a case of severe bilateral ectasia after LASIK that was treated with implantation of small-diameter Keraring intrastromal corneal ring segments (Mediphacos Ltd). METHODS: A 31-year-old woman underwent LASIK in 2001 at a different institution. One year after LASIK, the patient complained of decreased vision in the left eye and underwent LASIK retreatment. Three months after retreatment, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was counting fingers and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSVCA) was 0.4 in the left eye; UCVA was 0.1 and BSCVA was 0.3 in the right eye. Corneal topography showed inferior steepening bilaterally, consistent with ectasia, and the patient was fitted with rigid gas permeable contact lenses. The patient presented to our clinic 4 years after bilateral LASIK with severe loss of BSCVA in both eyes. Examination confirmed the diagnosis of severe bilateral ectasia. The patient underwent implantation of small-diameter Keraring segments assisted by femtosecond laser in June 2005 (left eye) and March 2006 (right eye). RESULTS: Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved by four lines in both eyes. Postoperative keratometry showed a decrease of seven diopters in the right eye and nine diopters in the left eye. Postoperative refraction and keratometry have remained stable for 18 and 10 months in the left and right eyes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of intracorneal ring segments can be considered as a treatment option in patients with severe ectasia after LASIK.     

Functional and cosmetic outcomes of combined penetrating keratoplasty and iris reconstruction lens implantation in eyes with a history of trauma

PURPOSE: To determine the functional and cosmetic outcomes of combined iris reconstruction lens (Ophtec) implantation and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in eyes with acquired partial or complete aniridia. SETTING: Jules Stein Eye Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. METHODS: In a prospective nonrandomized single-center interventional case series, efficacy measures included improvement in cosmesis and reduction in glare, star bursts, and photophobia. Safety measures included changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reports of adverse events, and surgical complications. RESULTS: The 9 eyes in the study had a history of penetrating or blunt trauma and were aphakic or in need of cataract surgery. Corneal pathologies necessitating transplantation included scarring, decompensation, or failure of a previous graft. Postoperatively, all patients were pleased with the cosmetic improvement of the study eye and all reported a reduction in visual disturbances. By the final follow-up examination, the BCVA improved in 4 patients but worsened in 5. Three adverse events were reported. There were no intraoperative surgical complications. The most serious postoperative complications were a pressure spike leading to loss of light perception, corneal graft rejection, and graft failure. The most common postoperative problem was surgically induced irregular corneal astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Ophtec iris reconstruction lens implantation and simultaneous PK reduced visual disturbances and improved the aesthetic appearance of the eyes. The long-term safety of the procedure, judged by BCVA and postoperative complications, was mixed, with both good and bad outcomes.     

Contralateral comparison of visual outcome of AcrySof IQ and SA60AT intraocular lenses

Objective: To compare the visual performance of aspherical AcrySof IQ (SN60WF) and SA60AT spherical intraocular lenses after cataract surgery. Design: Prospective comparative study.Participants: Seventy eyes of 35 patients who underwent phacoemulsification for cataract surgery.Methods: The IQ lens was implanted in one eye and the SA60AT lens in the other eye of every patient. Refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were measured 1 and 3 months after surgery. At 3 months’ follow-up, the quality of vision, in terms of contrast sensitivity (CS) with and without glare and higher-order aberrations (HOA), was also determined.Results: At 3 months postoperative, the mean UCVA in the IQ and SA60AT groups was 0.25 (SD 0.26) and 0.30 (SD 0.27), respectively, and BSCVA was 0.10 (SD 0.16) in both groups. Spherical refractive error was -0.56 (SD 1.03) D and -0.47 (SD 0.64) D in the IQ and SA groups, respectively. In photopic conditions without glare, IQ eyes had statistically significant better CS at 12 cycles per degree (cpd) and better function at 3 and 18 cpd, and in mesopic conditions without glare, IQ eyes also had better results at 3, 12, and 18 cpd. In mesopic conditions with glare, IQ eyes also had better CS in 6 and 18 cpd. In terms of aberrations, the IQ group had significantly (p < 0.05) lower spherical aberrations, root mean-square, and coma X and Y values with 6 mm pupil size than the SA group.Conclusions: In terms of refraction, no significant difference was found between these 2 types, but there was a difference in the quality of vision in photopic and mesopic conditions and also HOA. Those with reactive and dilated pupils, such as younger patients and night drivers, may be more satisfied with IQ aspherical lenses.     

LASIK in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of LASIK for hyperopia in pediatric eyes with amblyopia resulting from anisometropia. METHODS: Thirty-two children with anisometropic amblyopia in whom conventional therapy was unsuccessful underwent unilateral LASIK between 1999 and 2005. Mean patient age was 10.3 +/- 3.1 years (range: 4 to 15 years), and mean follow-up was 20.1 +/- 15.1 months (range: 12 to 60 months). At the last follow-up examination, spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean preoperative and postoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction of the treated eyes was 5.17 +/- 1.65 and 1.39 +/- 1.21 diopters (D), respectively (P < .01). Mean UCVA was 0.06 +/- 0.09 (range: 0.01 to 0.5) preoperatively and 0.27 +/- 0.23 (range: 0.05 to 0.8) postoperatively (P < .01). Mean BSCVA was 0.20 +/- 0.17 (range: 0.01 to 0.8) preoperatively and 0.35 +/- 0.25 (range: 0.1 to 1.0) postoperatively (P < .01). Six eyes gained > or = 4 lines of BSCVA, 4 eyes gained 2 to 3 lines, 12 eyes gained 1 line, and 9 eyes were unchanged; only 1 eye lost 1 line of BSCVA due to haze in the flap-stroma interface. None of the patients reported halos or glare. There were no intraoperative or postoperative flap complications. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK seems to be an effective and safe procedure for the management of hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia in select cases. Visual acuity improved in the amblyopic eyes and was associated with decreased anisometropia. The refractive response to hyperopic LASIK in children appears to be similar to that of adults with comparable refractive errors.