Survival of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases after Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan-Eluting Microspheres: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Comparing RECIST 1.1 and Choi Criteria

PurposeTo evaluate the factors that affected overall survival and hepatic progression–free survival using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and Choi criteria in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using irinotecan-eluting microspheres (IEMs) who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy.Materials and MethodsA single-institution retrospective analysis was performed including patients with unresectable liver metastases from a colorectal primary malignancy and treated with IEM-TACE. Radiologic hepatic progression–free survival was measured using the RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria.ResultsThe median patient age was 61.5 years, with 80 (67%) men. A total of 328 IEM-TACE procedures were performed during the study period. One hundred eighteen patients who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy before TACE demonstrated a median overall survival of 12.7 months. Overall survival was higher in patients who had previous primary resection (P < .05), prior ablation (P < .05), or completed the scheduled TACE treatments (P < .05) but was adversely affected by the presence of extrahepatic disease (P < .05) and larger preprocedural tumor burden (P < .01). Prior systemic chemotherapy lines (P = .98) and microsphere size (P = .34) did not affect survival. Partial radiologic response to treatment using the Choi criteria (n = 28, P < .01) correlated significantly with survival, a correlation not seen with the RECIST 1.1 measurements (n = 5, P = .13).ConclusionsA partial response to treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated by TACE with IEMs measured using the Choi criteria correlated significantly with improved survival, while RECIST 1.1 measurements did not.     

Intra-Arterial Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), transarterial radioembolization, and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.MethodsA search was conducted on Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for the median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SRs), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), whereas two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RRs) and conversion to resection rates (CRRs).ResultsA total of 71 prospective nonrandomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified, comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond the first-line, DEE-TACE + SCT (n = 152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.5–29.1) months and a 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95% CI, 21.8–25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE + SCT appeared to consistently have the highest pooled SRs at 1 year (81.9%) and 2 years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015–2020). DEE-TACE + SCT and HAI + SCT had the highest pooled RRs of 56.7% (I² = 0.90) and 62.6% (I² = 0.87) and pooled CRRs of 35.5% (I² = 0.00) and 30.3% (I² = 0.80), respectively.ConclusionsAlbeit significant heterogeneity, the paucity of high-quality evidence, and the noncomparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE + SCT have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.     

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Embolics versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PurposeTo compare the cost-effectiveness of using doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization versus that of using conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsA decision-analysis model was constructed over the lifespan of a payer’s perspective. The model simulated the clinical course, including periprocedural complications, additional transarterial chemoembolization or other treatments (ablation, radioembolization, or systemic treatment), palliative care, and death, of patients with unresectable HCC. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature. Base case calculations, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and multiple two-way sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsIn the base case calculations for patients with a median age of 67 years (range for conventional transarterial chemoembolization: 28–88 years, range for DEE-transarterial chemoembolization: 16–93 years), conventional transarterial chemoembolization yielded a health benefit of 2.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at a cost of $125,324, whereas DEE-transarterial chemoembolization yielded 1.71 QALY for $144,816. In 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, conventional transarterial chemoembolization continued to be a more cost-effective strategy. conventional transarterial chemoembolization was cost-effective when the complication risks for both the procedures were simultaneously varied from 0% to 30%. DEE-transarterial chemoembolization became cost-effective if the conventional transarterial chemoembolization mortality exceeded that of DEE-transarterial chemoembolization by 17% in absolute values. The two-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that conventional transarterial chemoembolization was cost-effective until the risk of disease progression was >0.4% of that for DEE-transarterial chemoembolization in absolute values. Our analysis showed that DEE-transarterial chemoembolization would be more cost-effective if it offered >2.5% higher overall survival benefit than conventional transarterial chemoembolization in absolute values.ConclusionsCompared with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization yielded a higher number of QALY at a lower cost, making it the more cost-effective of the 2 modalities.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases Refractory to First-Line Radiotherapy

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization for the palliation of radiotherapy (RT)-failure bone metastases (BMs) with those of re-radiotherapy (Re-RT) in achieving pain relief.Materials and MethodsFifty consecutive patients with RT-failure BMs who had undergone Re-RT (23 patients) and transarterial chemoembolization (27 patients) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was clinical response, and the secondary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Pain assessment was performed using the numerical rating scale, and tumor response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pain relief was defined as lack of pain with no analgesic usage (complete pain response) or a decrease in pain score by ≥3 points with analgesic usage (partial pain response).ResultsThe pain relief rates in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups were 57% and 92%, respectively (P = .006). The median pain relief duration was 2 and 3 months in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .002). The 6-month pain-free survival rates were 30% and 51% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .08). The median tumor reduction rates were –4% and 9% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P < .001). The objective response rates were 0% and 11% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .29). No serious adverse events or complications were observed.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization achieved a superior response rate and longer duration of palliation in symptomatic RT-failure BMs.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

Integrated Liver Inflammatory Score Predicts the Therapeutic Outcome of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of the integrated liver inflammatory score (ILIS) in predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received transarterial chemoembolization, and to compare ILIS to other prognostic scoring systems and inflammatory indices.Materials and MethodsThis study included 192 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization from 3 medical centers. The potential risk factors of the patients’ overall survival (OS) were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The predictive performances of ILIS in 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The discriminatory power in the OS of ILIS and the other known scoring systems or inflammatory indices was determined by C-statistic.ResultsMultivariate regression analysis showed that high ILIS (P = .047), low lymphocyte count (P = .034), beyond up-to-seven criteria (P = .021), and nonresponse to the first transarterial chemoembolization session (P = .039) were risk factors for poor prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization. The predictive performances of ILIS for 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival were good, with area under the curve values of 0.627, 0.631, 0.621, 0.577, and 0.681, respectively. ILIS outperformed other standard scoring systems and inflammatory indices in predicting OS, with a C-statistic of 0.625.ConclusionsILIS is a powerful prognostic index for predicting the survival of patients with HCC after transarterial chemoembolization, which suggests that ILIS before treatment should be considered during the patient evaluation process.     

Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with and without Pre-Existing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts

PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with and without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).Materials and MethodsThis single-institution study included a retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization for HCC between January 2010 and April 2017. Twenty-five patients had preexisting TIPS, and 25 patients were selected to control for age, sex, and target tumor size. Baseline median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD; 13 TIPS, 9 control; P < .001) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI; 3 TIPS, 2 control; P < .001) differed between groups. Safety was assessed on the basis of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and change in MELD and ALBI grade assessed between 3 and 6 months. Efficacy was assessed by tumor response and time to progression (TTP).ResultsThere was 1 severe adverse event (CTCAE grade >2) in the TIPS group. There was no difference in the change in MELD or ALBI grade. Although there was no difference in tumor response (P = .19), more patients achieved a complete response in the control group (19/25, 76%) than in the TIPS group (13/25, 52%). There was no difference in TTP (P = .82). At 1 year, 2 patients in the control group and 3 patients in the TIPS group received a liver transplant. Seven patients died in the TIPS group.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization is as safe and effective in patients with TIPS as in patients without TIPS, despite worse baseline liver function. Severe adverse events are rare and may be transient.     

Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres as a First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma—A Prospective Feasibility Study

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) radioembolization as first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsThis prospective study enrolled patients who had never received chemotherapy, liver embolization, and radiation therapy. The tumors were solitary in 16 patients, multiple in 8 patients, unilobar in 14 patients, and bilobar in 10 patients. Patients underwent transarterial radioembolization with ⁹⁰Y-labeled glass microspheres. The primary end point was hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), tumor response, and toxicity.ResultsTwenty-four patients (age, 72.3 years ± 9.3; 12 women) were included in the study. The median delivered radiation dose was 135.5 Gy (interquartile range, 77.6 Gy). The median HPFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9–7.0 months). Analysis failed to identify any prognostic factor associated with HPFS. Imaging response at 3 months showed 56% disease control, and the best radiographic response was 71% disease control. The median OS from the radioembolization treatment was 19.4 months (95% CI, 5.0–33.7). Patients with solitary ICC had significantly longer median OS than patients with multifocal ICC: 25.9 months (95% CI, 20.8–31.0 months) versus 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.0–13.4 months) (P = .02). Patients with progression on the 3-month imaging follow-up had significantly shorter median OS than patients who had stable disease at 3 months: 10.7 months (95% CI, 0.7–20.7 months) versus 37.3 months (95% CI, 16.5–58.1 months) (P = .003). Two (8%) Grade 3 toxicities were reported.ConclusionsFirst-line treatment of ICC with radioembolization showed promising OS and minimal toxicity, especially in patients with solitary tumor. Radioembolization may be considered as a first-line treatment option for unresectable ICC.     

Safety and Effectiveness of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization around the Time of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatic Metastases

PurposeTo assess the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 radioembolization and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy within a short interval for the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases.Materials and MethodsThis single-institution retrospective study included 22 patients (12 men; median age, 65 y ± 11) with unresectable hepatic metastases and preserved functional status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1) who received immunotherapy and radioembolization within a 15-month period (median, 63.5 d; interquartile range, 19.7–178.2 d) from February 2013 to March 2018. Primary malignancies were uveal melanoma (12 of 22; 54.5%), soft tissue sarcoma (3; 13.6%), cutaneous melanoma (3; 14%), and others (4; 18.2%). Studies were reviewed to March 2019 to assess Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3/4 toxicities, disease progression, and death.ResultsThere were no grade 4 toxicities within 6 mo of radioembolization. Grade 3 hepatobiliary toxicities occurred in 3 patients (13.6%) within 6 months, 2 from rapid disease progression and 1 from a biliary stricture. Two patients (9.1%) experienced clinical toxicities, including grade 4 colitis at 6 months and hepatic abscess at 3 months. Median overall survival (OS) from first radioembolization was 20 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5–27.5 mo), and median OS from first immunotherapy was 23 months (95% CI, 15.9–30.1 mo). Within the uveal melanoma subgroup, the median OS from first radioembolization was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.2–19.8 mo). Median time to progression was 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.3–12.2 mo), and median progression-free survival was 7.8 mo (95% CI, 3.1–12.4 mo).ConclusionsCheckpoint immunotherapy around the time of radioembolization is safe, with a low incidence of toxicity independent of primary malignancy.     

Polyethylene Glycol Drug-Eluting Embolic Microspheres Loaded with Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Feasibility,Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Study

PurposePolyethylene glycol drug-eluting microspheres (PEG-DEMs) can be loaded to elute doxorubicin. The current study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of PEG-DEMs in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and methodsThe current prospective, multicenter, dose-escalation study enrolled 25 patients (68% men) with early or intermediate stage HCC and a performance status of 0. Patients in Cohort I were assigned to receive target doxorubicin doses of 75, 100, or 150 mg. Analyses were performed on the basis of the specific dose of doxorubicin that the patients received because some patients received less than the assigned dose. Patients in Cohort II received the maximum safe tested dose. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. The tumor response was evaluated every 3 months according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.ResultsThe maximum tested safe dose of doxorubicin was 150 mg. For the groups that received ≤75, 75–100, and 101–150 mg of doxorubicin, the peak plasma concentrations were 286.7 ng/mL ± 220.1, 157.1 ng/mL ± 94.6, and 245.4 ng/mL ± 142.8, respectively; the areas under the curves calculated from 0 to 24 h were 421.7 (ng × h)/mL ± 221.2, 288.1 (ng × h)/mL ± 100.9, and 608.3 (ng × h)/mL ± 319.3, respectively, with almost complete clearance at 24 h. There was no death within 30 d. The best objective response rate was 81%, and the disease control rate was 91%. The median overall survival was 27.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5 months to not evaluated [n.e.]); the median progression-free survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to n.e.).ConclusionsPEG-DEMs demonstrated a favorable safety profile with low systemic concentration of doxorubicin, and promising efficacy.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Using 100-μm Drug-Eluting Microspheres in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study and Midterm Follow-up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who are ineligible for curative treatment, using doxorubicin-loaded Tandem (Varian Medical) microspheres.Materials and MethodsBetween October 2015 and December 2017, 98 patients with unresectable HCC (69 males, 29 females; mean age, 60.5 ± 10.0 years of age; and American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage ≦T3a) treated with DEE transarterial chemoembolization using 100-μm doxorubicin-loaded microspheres were enrolled prospectively. All studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after treatment was used for tumor response assessment according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and downstaging profile.ResultsMedian follow-up was 21.2 months. At follow-up examinations at 0.5-, 1-, 1.5- and 2.5-year follow-up, OS rates were 93.8%, 89.5%, 79.4%, and 77.0%, respectively. Complete response (CR), partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were noted in 50 (51.0%), 23 (23.5%), 18 (18.4%), and 7 (7.1%) patients, respectively, with 93.9% disease control rate and 74.5% objective response rate. Mean OS was 28.7 months, and mean PFS was 19.6 months. Number of nodules >3, bilobar disease, larger tumor, and higher AJCC stage correlated with worse CR. No serious adverse events occurred after DEE transarterial chemoembolization. Successful downstage rate was 73.3% (22 of 30) and number of nodules predicting successful downstaging was 7 nodules (cutoff).ConclusionsTandem DEE transarterial chemoembolization provides safe and effective treatment for HCC and a bridge or downstage therapy for liver transplantation.     

Chronic Hepatotoxicity in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Transarterial Radioembolization

PurposeTo compare the manifestations of chronic liver injury following transarterial chemoembolization with those of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET).Materials and MethodsThis study consisted of an Institutional Review Board-approved single-institution retrospective analysis of NET patients who received transarterial chemoembolization from 2006 to 2016 and TARE from 2005 to 2014 and survived at least 1 year from the initial treatment. Patients receiving only transarterial chemoembolization (n = 63) or TARE (n = 28) were evaluated for the presence or absence of durable hepatic toxicities occurring at least 6 months after initial treatment. The definitions and grades of liver injury were adapted from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and were characterized by the presence of laboratory or clinical toxicities of Grade 3 or above.ResultsChronic hepatic toxicity occurred in 14 of 63 transarterial chemoembolization patients (22%) with a total of 26 Grade 3-4 events, in whom elevation of bilirubin was the most common toxicity, compared to 8 of 28 TARE patients (29%) with a total of 16 Grade 3-4 and 2 Grade 5 events, in whom ascites were the most frequent toxicity. There were more laboratory toxicities in the transarterial chemoembolization group (65% vs 38%, P = .11) and fewer Grade 4–5 injuries (6% vs 27% of patients, P = .06). There was also a significantly higher number of patients who experienced intrahepatic progression of disease in the transarterial chemoembolization cohort than in the TARE patients (75% vs 43%, respectively; P = .005).ConclusionsDelayed hepatotoxicity from transarterial chemoembolization and TARE occurred in 22% and 29% of patients, respectively, from 6 months to several years following treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization-related toxicities on average were less severe and manifested primarily as laboratory derangements, compared to TARE toxicities which consisted of clinical hepatic decompensation.     

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Tirapazamine Chemoembolization for Unresectable Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo investigate the safety of replacing doxorubicin with tirapazamine in conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in an Asian population with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to determine the optimal tirapazamine dose for phase II studies.Materials and MethodsThis was a phase I, 3 + 3 dose-escalation study for patients with unresectable early- and intermediate-stage HCC who received 5, 10, or 20 mg/m² of intra-arterial (IA) tirapazamine followed by ethiodized oil/gelatin sponge-based embolization. Key eligibilities included HCCs no more than 10 cm in diameter, prior embolization allowed, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh score of 5–7, and platelet count of ≥60,000 μL. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 nonhematological or grade 4 hematological toxicity, with the exception of transient elevation of aminotransferase levels after the procedure.ResultsSeventeen patients were enrolled, 59% of whom had progression from a prior HCC therapy and 35% of whom had progression or recurrence after TACE. All patients tolerated the tirapazamine TACE well without any DLT or serious adverse event. Using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the complete response (CR) rate was 47%, and the CR + partial response rate was 65%. The median duration of response was not reached. The median time to progression was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval, 5.1–not reached). The median overall survival was 29.3 months. The selected phase II dose was set at a fixed dose of 35 mg of IA tirapazamine.ConclusionsIA tirapazamine with transarterial embolization was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy signals in intermediate-stage HCC, justifying pursuit of a phase II study.     

Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Microwave Ablation after Downstaging with Transarterial Chemoembolization to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A

PurposeTo compare the clinical results of microwave ablation (MWA) between patients downstaged to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and those initially classified as BCLC Stage A.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2012 to May 2017, 1,087 patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1): 86 patients underwent MWA as a curative treatment after downstaging to BCLC Stage A by TACE (downstaging group) and 86 patients initially classified as BCLC Stage A underwent MWA (control group). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups were compared.ResultsThe 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95.3%, 79.1%, and 58.1%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 93.0%, 81.4%, and 61.6%, respectively, in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50–1.13; P = .162). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 80.2%, 50.0%, and 24.4%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 77.9%, 52.3%, and 27.9%, respectively, in the control group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76–1.53; P = .678). No significant differences were found in OS and DFS.ConclusionsThe long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent MWA after downstaging to BCLC Stage A using TACE was similar to that in patients with initial BCLC Stage A.     

Transarterial Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo investigate the overall efficacy and survival profile of yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) radioembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis was completed using a random-effects model. Studies describing the use of ⁹⁰Y for unresectable ICC were included. The disease control rate (DCR), downstaged-to-resectable rate, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response rate, pooled median overall survival (OS), pooled median progression-free survival (PFS), and mean reported survival rates ranging from 3 to 36 months were evaluated.ResultsTwenty-one studies detailing a total of 921 patients were included. The overall DCR was 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.7%–87.8%; I² = 81%). In 11% of the cases, patients were downstaged to being surgically resectable (95% CI, 6.1%–15.9%; I² = 78%). The CA19-9 response rate was 67.2% (95% CI, 54.5%–79.8%; I² = 60%). From the time of radioembolization, PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI, 4.2–11.3 months; I² = 94%) and median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.8 months; I² = 62%). Lastly, the mean overall reported survival proportions were 84% at 3 months (standard deviation [SD], 10%), 69% at 6 months (SD, 16%), 47% at 12 months (SD, 19%), 31% at 18 months (SD, 21%), 30% at 24 months (SD, 19%), 21% at 30 months (SD, 27%), and 5% at 36 months (SD, 7%).ConclusionsRadioembolization with ⁹⁰Y for unresectable ICC results in substantial downstaging, disease control, and survival.     

Preoperative Transarterial Embolization of Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma Using n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate: Case-Control Comparison with Microspheres

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA) for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA).Materials and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on patients with JNA who underwent TAE and endoscopic resection between 2020 and 2022. Patients embolized with nBCA were identified, and those embolized with microspheres were set as the control group. Data on demographics, symptoms, tumor characteristics, blood loss, adverse events, residual disease, and recurrence were collected, and case-control analysis was performed for the 2 groups. Differences in characteristics between the groups were tested using the Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to analyze the univariate and multivariate influences on blood loss.ResultsTwenty patients were included in this study: 13 in the microsphere group and 7 in the nBCA group. The median blood loss was 400 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 200–520 mL) in the nBCA group and 1,000 mL (IQR, 500–1,000 mL) in the microsphere group (P = .028). The GLM confirmed lower blood loss in the nBCA group (relative risk, 0.58 [0.41–0.83]; P = .01). A residual tumor was found in 1 patient in each group (7.7% vs 14.3%; P = 1.000). Recurrence was not observed in any patient. None of the patients experienced adverse events during embolization.ConclusionsTAE of advanced JNA with nBCA glue is safe and effective and can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss compared with microspheres.     

Transarterial Radioembolization Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Liver-Dominant Metastatic Disease Using Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y)-labeled glass microspheres in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective, single-center study evaluated 26 patients (12 men and 14 women; mean age, 65.5 ± 11.2 years) with liver-dominant metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with TARE from April 2010 to September 2017. All patients received systemic chemotherapy before TARE, and 19 received systemic therapy after embolization. Nineteen patients had extrahepatic disease at the time of TARE. Response to treatment was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 3 months.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) from pancreatic cancer diagnosis was 33.0 months (range, 8.5–87.5 months); median OS from diagnosis of liver metastasis was 21.8 months (range, 2.0–86.2 months); and median OS from TARE treatment was 7.0 months (range, 1.0–84.1 months). Grade 1–2 clinical toxicities were noted in 21 patients (80.8%), and 24 patients (92.3%) had grade 1–2 biochemical toxicities. Four patients (15.4%) had grade 3 clinical toxicities, and 6 patients (23.1%) had grade 3 biochemical toxicities. Imaging was available in 22 patients (84.6%) and demonstrated partial response in 1 patient, stable disease in 9 patients, and progressive disease in 12 patients. Improved hepatic progression-free survival was associated in patients younger than 65 years and in those whose carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level decreased or remained stable after treatment.ConclusionsTARE with ⁹⁰Y-labeled glass microspheres is safe and led to promising OS in liver-dominant metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization in a Woodchuck Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo assess the feasibility of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic (DEE) microspheres in a woodchuck model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsNine woodchucks were studied: 4 normal animals and 5 animals infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus in which HCC had developed. Three animals with HCC underwent multidetector CT. A 3-F sheath was introduced into the femoral artery, and the hepatic arteries were selectively catheterized with 2.0–2.4-F microcatheters. Normal animals underwent diagnostic angiography and bland embolization. Animals with HCC underwent DEE transarterial chemoembolization with 70–150-μm radiopaque microspheres loaded with 37.5 mg doxorubicin per milliliter. Cone-beam CT and multidetector CT were performed. Following euthanasia, explanted livers underwent micro-CT, histopathologic examination, and fluorescence imaging of doxorubicin.ResultsThe tumors were hypervascular and supplied by large-caliber tortuous vessels, with arteriovenous shunts present in 2 animals. There was heterogeneous enhancement on multidetector CT with areas of necrosis. Six tumors were identified. The most common location was the right medial lobe (n = 3). Mean tumor volume was 30.7 cm³ ± 12.3. DEE chemoembolization of tumors was achieved. Excluding the 2 animals with arteriovenous shunts, the mean volume of DEE microspheres injected was 0.49 mL ± 0.17. Fluorescence imaging showed diffusion of doxorubicin from the DEE microspheres into the tumor.ConclusionsWoodchuck HCC shares imaging appearances and biologic characteristics with human HCC. Selective catheterization and DEE chemoembolization may similarly be performed. Woodchucks may be used to model interventional therapies and possibly characterize radiologic–pathologic correlations.