Antiviral prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers are at considerable risk of reactivation of HBV infection when undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Complications of HBV reactivation, including asymptomatic elevation of HBV DNA levels, acute hepatitis, acute liver failure, and delays or dose reductions in chemotherapy, are avoidable with appropriate prophylactic oral antiviral therapy. This article reviews evidence for and presents a grade A recommendation supporting primary prophylaxis among HBV carriers with lamivudine. The dose and duration of prophylaxis, risk of lamivudine resistance, and future directions of prophylactic therapy for HBV reactivation during chemotherapy are discussed. Recommendations are suggested based on expert opinion for prophylaxis with the combination of lamivudine plus adefovir or with entecavir as alternative antiviral strategies that substantially reduce or avoid the risk of HBV antiviral drug resistance.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a patient undergoing steroid-free chemotherapy

A 62-year-old Japanese man who was positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBe antibody, underwent chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin‘s lymphoma (NHL). Mutations were detected in the precore region (nt1896) of HBV. Because steroid-containing regimen may cause reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis may progress to be fulminant afcer its withdrawal, we administered CHO (CPA, DOX and VCR) therapy and the patient obtained complete response. However, he developed acute exacerbation of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation. Recovery was achieved with lamivudine (100 mg/d) and plasma exchange. The present case suggests that acute exacerbation of hepatitis can occur with steroid-free regimen. Because the efficacy of the prophylactic use of lamivudine has been reported and the steroid enhances curability of malignant lymphoma,the steroid containing regimen with prophylaxis of lamivudine should be evaluated further.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with anti-TNFα agents: A retrospective analysis of 49 cases

Clinical guidelines regarding anti-viral prophylaxis for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers starting anti-TNFα agents are not yet fully established, even in endemic regions of HBV infection. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 52 HBsAg carriers with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that had been administered anti-TNFα treatment at seven medical centers in South Korea. Periodic data of liver function tests and serum HBV DNA were both utilized to assess HBV reactivation. The YMDD motif mutation of HBV DNA polymerase was tested in lamivudine-treated patients with elevated HBV DNA. Three of the 52 patients were excluded from the analysis. Of the 49 analyzed patients, 20 patients received anti-viral prophylaxis (15 lamivudine, five entecavir) with anti-TNFα treatment. The remaining 29 patients were treated with anti-viral agents if needed at the discretion of the clinician and did not receive prophylaxis. Of the 29 patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis, two (6.9%) developed viral reactivation within a year of anti-TNFα treatment. In the prophylaxis group, one patient developed viral reactivation at week 64 of anti-TNFα therapy attributed to YMDD mutation caused by lamivudine. Patients with HBV reactivation all responded well to anti-viral therapy. In summary, anti-viral prophylaxis helped preventing HBV reactivation in HBsAg carriers with RA or AS starting anti-TNFα, yet mutation in the YMDD motif of HBV DNA polymerase could be detrimental to some patients under long-term lamivudine prophylaxis.     

Hepatitis B reactivation and timing for prophylaxis

It is known that immunotherapy and cancer chemotherapy may cause hepatitis B virus(HBV)reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers and inactive chronic hepatitis B patients.Guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis regardless of HBV DNA levels to prevent reactivation.We read from the article written by Liu et al that Lamivudine was given inadequate time for antiviral prophylaxis.     

Late onset of hepatitis B virus reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: successful treatment with combined entecavir plus tenofovir therapy

L. Milazzo, M. Corbellino, A. Foschi, V. Micheli, A. Dodero, A. Mazzocchi, V. Montefusco, G. Zehender, S. Antinori. Late onset of hepatitis B virus reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: successful treatment with combined entecavir plus tenofovir therapy.
Transpl Infect Dis 2011. All rights reserved Abstract: Prophylaxis with lamivudine (LAM) is recommended for hepatitis B core antibody‐positive allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, but the optimal timing for the institution and duration of the prophylaxis is still unknown. Furthermore, considering the high rate of mortality associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV‐R), the most potent and long‐term effective antiviral regimen should be considered. We report here a case of late onset of HBV‐R after a long‐term prophylaxis with LAM in a patient who underwent HSCT for non‐Hodgkin lymphoma and who was successfully treated with a combination antiviral regimen including entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.     

拉米夫定及恩替卡韦预防和治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤相关性HBV再激活的疗效对比

目的对比观察拉米夫定及恩替卡韦在预防和治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)合并慢性HBV感染的患者化疗期间出现HBV再激活的有效性。方法自2008年1月至2013年4月,共收集NHL合并HBV感染患者94例,分为拉米夫定治疗组和恩替卡韦治疗组,两组化疗同时分别服用拉米夫定(100 mg/d)和恩替卡韦(0.5 mg/d),就组间病毒学突破率,原发性无应答率、病毒学突破相关性肝炎突发等方面进行对比。计量资料2组独立样本用t检验,3组独立样本用单因素方差分析进行比较;计数资料用χ2检验进行组间比较。结果抗HBV治疗前HBV DNA103拷贝/ml组,服用拉米夫定或恩替卡韦的病毒学突破率、肝炎突发率差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.03,P0.05)。抗HBV治疗前HBV DNA103拷贝/ml组,服用拉米夫定的患者病毒学突破率为37.5%,原发耐药率为9.4%,肝炎突发率28.1%,肝衰竭发生率3.1%;服用恩替卡韦的患者上述指标分别为3.1%、0、0、0,两者病毒学突破率及肝炎突发率均有统计学差异(χ2=11.68、10.47,P0.05)。结论 NHL合并HBV感染患者抗HBV治疗前HBV DNA103拷贝/ml,拉米夫定和恩替卡韦疗效相当;抗HBV治疗前HBV DNA103拷贝/ml的患者恩替卡韦有更低的病毒学突破率及肝炎突发率,能更好地保证化疗的顺利进行。     

Lamivudine prophylaxis is effective in reducing hepatitis B reactivation and reactivation‐related mortality in chemotherapy patients: a meta‐analysis

Background: Hepatitis B viral (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing chemotherapy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Lamivudine has been suggested to be useful as a prophylaxis for HBV reactivation; however, its impact on overall survival and HBV reactivation‐related liver disease survival is unclear. Objective: To determine the effect of lamivudine prophylaxis on the rate of HBV reactivation, overall survival and HBV reactivation‐related survival in patients with HBV undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration Database, reference lists and abstracts from national meetings. Statistical analysis was performed using revman . Results: Eleven studies met the defined inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Two‐hundred and twenty patients received lamivudine prophylaxis and 400 did not receive prophylaxis. Patients given lamivudine prophylaxis had an 87% decrease in HBV reactivation [risk ratio (RR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.24] than patients not given prophylaxis [absolute risk reduction (ARR) ?0.46, 95% CI, ?0.61 to ?0.31]. The number needed to treat to prevent one reactivation was 3. The Lamivudine prophylaxis group was also associated with a 70% reduction in reactivation‐related mortality (RR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.1–0.94) compared with controls (ARR ?0.03, 95% CI, 0.07–0.00). There was a reduction in treatment delays and premature termination of chemotherapy in the lamivudine prophylaxis arm (RR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.27–0.63; ARR ?0.33, 95% CI, ?0.33 to ?0.15). There was no significant heterogeneity in the comparisons. Conclusion: Lamivudine prophylaxis during chemotherapy is effective in reducing the rate of HBV reactivation, and reactivation‐related liver mortality. Patients with lamivudine prophylaxis had less chemotherapy treatment delays and premature termination of their chemotherapy. Few patients need to be treated to prevent reactivation. Patients with HBV undergoing chemotherapy should be started on lamivudine prophylaxis.     

Hepatitis B reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine in patients with haematological malignancy on completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The hepatic outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients undergoing chemotherapy after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine is unknown. AIMS: To examine the occurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. METHODS: Pre-emptive lamivudine was started one week before initiation of chemotherapy in 46 consecutive HBsAg positive patients and continued for the entire duration of chemotherapy. Pre-emptive lamivudine was stopped at a median 3.1 (range 3.0-3.4) months after completion of chemotherapy. Patients were longitudinally followed up after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. RESULTS: Median time of follow up after withdrawal of lamivudine was 25.7 (range 5.7-75.7) months. Eleven of the 46 patients (23.9%) developed HBV reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. Eight of the 16 patients with high pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA (> or =10(4) copies/ml) compared with three of the 30 patients with low pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA (<10(4) copies/ml) developed HBV reactivation (50.0% v 10.0%, respectively; p<0.001). Hepatitis B e antigen positive patients were also more likely to develop HBV reactivation (5/11 (45.5%) v 6/35 (17.1%), respectively; p = 0.041). A high pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA (> or =10(4) copies/ml) was the most important risk factor for HBV reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine on Cox proportional hazards analysis (relative risk 16.13, (95% confidence interval 2.99-87.01; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HBV reactivation is more likely to occur in patients with high pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. A more prolonged course of antiviral therapy may be necessary in these patients after completion of chemotherapy in order to reduce post-chemotherapy HBV reactivation.     

Fatal postlymphoma chemotherapy hepatitis B reactivation secondary to the emergence of a YMDD mutant strain with lamivudine resistance in a noncirrhotic patient

Hepatitis B reactivation is a well-known complication during or after chemotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (HBV) carriers. The current practice guidelines in Canada and the United States recommends patients receive antiviral prophylaxis prior to the onset of chemotherapy in chronic HBV carriers with lamivudine. We report a case of a 57-year-old man with follicular lymphoma on lamivudine prophylaxis and no clinical evidence of cirrhosis, and developed fatal HBV reactivation after the emergence of a YMDD mutant strain of HBV that confers lamivudine resistance. Fatal reactivation secondary to the development of lamivudine resistance has not, to date, been well- reported. Our experience indicates the need to carefully monitor patients for suspected drug- resistant HBV mutants with the addition of anti-viral agents effective against the YMDD mutational strain, when lamivudine resistance emerges.     

Use of entecavir to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation during cytotoxic chemotherapy for solid malignancy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy that includes steroids. International studies have shown that lamivudine reduces the incidence and severity of hepatitis in HBV carriers undergoing chemotherapy to treat malignancies. However, prolonged lamivudine therapy is associated with an increased risk of drug-resistant tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutations. Here, we studied the role of entecavir in preventing morbidity and mortality associated with HBV reactivation. Three patients with both solid malignancies and hepatitis B surface antigen-positive hepatitis B underwent cytotoxic chemotherapy with steroids. They were followed up for at least 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic regimens comprised carboplatin and paclitaxel for non-small-cell lung cancer, and docetaxel monotherapy or cyclophosphamide plus epirubicin for breast cancer, respectively. All patients completed chemotherapy with steroids without developing severe hepatitis that could be attributable to HBV reactivation. Entecavir prevented the incidence and severity of hepatitis in HBV carriers undergoing chemotherapy for malignancies. Although further studies are required to evaluate whether entecavir can prevent the increased risk of YMDD mutation and decrease the rates of disrupted chemotherapy due to severe hepatitis more effectively than lamivudine, entecavir should be considered before lamivudine for such patients.     

Frequency of hepatitis B virus mutant in asymptomatic hepatitis B virus carriers receiving prophylactic lamivudine during chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy in asymptomatic HBV carriers. Prophylactic lamivudine has proven effective for its prevention, but the potential emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV YMMD mutants, as shown in patients treated for chronic hepatitis, may limit its use. To evaluate the frequency of HBV YMMD mutant and its clinical significance, we have analysed 32 courses of primary lamivudine prophylaxis given to HBV carriers with haematologic malignancies, from the start until 1-5 months after the end of chemotherapy. Lamivudine was used for a median of 6 months (range 2-24+) and median follow-up was 19.5 months (range 5-40). Four episodes of HBV reactivation with mild hepatitis and no evidence of mutant strain occurred after chemotherapy completion and after lamivudine withdrawal. At follow-up YMMD mutant was detected in one patient with normal transaminase levels, who had been on continuous lamivudine for 20 months. In conclusion, among HBV carriers treated with chemotherapy for haematologic malignancies, the emergence of HBV YMMD mutant occurred in 3.1% of prophylactic lamivudine courses and was of little clinical relevance.     

Meta-analysis of prophylactic entecavir or lamivudine against hepatitis B virus reactivation

Introduction and aim. Studies suggest that entecavir and lamivudine are useful as prophylactics against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy, but which drug is more effective is unclear. Here we meta-analyzed available evidence on relative efficacy of prophylactic entecavir or lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis B infection who were undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy.Material and methods. Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar as well as reference lists in relevant articles to find studies published between January 2005 and May 2015 that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on HBV reactivation, HBV-related hepatitis and all-cause mortality were extracted from the studies and meta-analyzed.Results. A total of eight studies involving 593 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was performed using a fixed-effect model since no significant heterogeneity was found. Entecavir was associated with significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation than lamivudine (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52) as well as lower risk of HBV-related hepatitis (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.40). The two drugs were associated with similar risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.35). Egger’s test suggested no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis.Conclusions. The available evidence suggests that entecavir is more effective than lamivudine for preventing HBV reactivation and HBV-related hepatitis in patients with chronic or resolved HBV infection who are undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy.     

A dose-ranging study of the efficacy and tolerability of entecavir in Lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Entecavir is a nucleoside analogue with potent in vitro activity against lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). This randomized, dose-ranging, phase 2 study compared the efficacy and safety of entecavir with lamivudine in lamivudine-refractory patients. METHODS: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative patients (n = 182), viremic despite lamivudine treatment for > or =24 weeks or having documented lamivudine resistance substitutions, were switched directly to entecavir (1.0, 0.5, or 0.1 mg daily) or continued on lamivudine (100 mg daily) for up to 76 weeks. RESULTS: At week 24, significantly more patients receiving entecavir 1.0 mg (79%) or 0.5 mg (51%) had undetectable HBV DNA levels by branched chain DNA assay compared with lamivudine (13%; P < .0001). Entecavir 1.0 mg was superior to entecavir 0.5 mg for this end point (P < .01). After 48 weeks, mean reductions in HBV DNA levels were 5.06, 4.46, and 2.85 log(10) copies/mL on entecavir 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1 mg, respectively, significantly higher than 1.37 log(10) copies/mL on lamivudine. Significantly higher proportions of patients achieved normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels on entecavir 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1 mg (68%, 59%, and 47%, respectively) than on lamivudine (6%). One virologic rebound due to resistance occurred (in the 0.5-mg group). CONCLUSIONS: In HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative lamivudine-refractory patients, treatment with entecavir 1.0 and 0.5 mg daily was well tolerated and resulted in significant reductions in HBV DNA levels and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels. One milligram of entecavir was more effective than 0.5 mg in this population.     

Primary prophylaxis with lamivudine of hepatitis B virus reactivation in chronic HbsAg carriers with lymphoid malignancies treated with chemotherapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation of various degrees of severity, including fulminant hepatitis, may develop in 20-50% of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HbsAg)-positive patients undergoing immunosuppressive or cytostatic treatment. Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue that can directly suppress HBV replication. We have performed a pilot study to test the efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine as a primary prophylaxis of HBV reactivation in 20 consecutive patients treated for haematological malignancies, mainly of lymphoid origin. Lamivudine, 100 mg/d, was given orally from the start until 1 month after the end of chemotherapy, which included corticosteroids and/or purine analogues in 85% of cases. It was well tolerated and did not cause any unexpected reduction of cytostatic drugs dosages. The chemotherapy programme was completed in all patients without modifications. A transient threefold increase in serum amylase was observed in one case. HBV-DNA levels decreased in six out of six patients (P = 0.039) and ALT levels in five out of six patients (P = 0.057) whose serum levels were abnormal at the onset of therapy. Two patients developed transient hepatitis. HBV reactivation was documented in only one of these patients who had stopped lamivudine 1 month before. No signs of HBV reactivation were detected both during and after treatment in 18 patients with a median follow-up of 6 months (range 3-12). Thus, primary prophylaxis with lamivudine may be a well tolerated and effective method to reduce the frequency of chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation in chronic HBsAg carriers.     

C ASE R EPORT: Dramatic response to lamivudine therapy following corticosteroid priming in chronic hepatitis B

A 21 year-old male patient with chronic hepatitis B was treated with lamivudine 150 mg daily after withdrawal of a short course of oral prednisolone (30 mg daily for 3 weeks, 15 mg daily for 1 week). Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA increased during prednisolone pretherapy and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was increasing after withdrawal of prednisolone. Clearance of HBV-DNA with hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and ALT normalization occurred within 2 months after starting lamivudine therapy. If this dramatic response to lamivudine therapy after corticosteroid priming is confirmed by further studies, the regimens used in this particular case might become a powerful therapeutic tool for chronic HBV infection.     

Hepatitus B virus reactivation in HBV-DNA negative and positive patients with hematological malignancies

Abstract

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a frequent complication of chemotherapy (CT) in patients with HBsAg carriers. In this prospective study, we documented CT induced HBV reactivation risk in patients with hematological malignancies. HBV reactivation risk is influenced by baseline viral load. Therefore, we divided our study population into two groups according to HBV-DNA status. HBV-DNA negative patients (n=18) were treated with nucleoside analogues once HBV reactivation was observed. HBV-DNA positive patients (n=12) commenced lamivudine before the initiation of the CT. In HBV-DNA negative patients HBV reactivation was found in 10 patients (55·5%). HBV reactivation was significantly more frequent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients (P=0·008) and in patients receiving rituximab containing chemotherapy regimens (P=0·06). Eight patients (80·0%) responded to antiviral treatment after HBV reactivation. Two CLL patients experienced a flare-up after the withdrawal of antiviral therapy. In HBV-DNA positive patients, HBV reactivation was observed in four patients (33·3%) during lamivudine treatment and in two patients after lamivudine withdrawal. This study demonstrated the increased risk of CT-induced HBV reactivation in CLL patients, for the first time.     

Hepatitis B exacerbation with a precore mutant virus following withdrawal of lamivudine in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient

Chronic active hepatitis B exacerbations have been reported following development of resistance to or withdrawal of lamivudine in HIV-infected patients. A 38-year-old woman with HIV and chronic HBV infections was hospitalized because of acute hepatitis. The occurrence of cytolysis with replication of HBV 2 months after withdrawing lamivudine suggests that our patient experienced a severe reactivation of HBV infection due to the modification of her treatment. Sequencing of the HBV precore region showed the strain to be a mutant. We conclude that lamivudine should not be stopped in HIV- and HBV-infected patients, but could be continued at the dose of 100mg/day as used in isolated HBV infection.     

Lamivudine prophylaxis for prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B virus carriers with malignancies

Summary.  Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is clearly documented, the role of antiviral prophylaxis in such individuals is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis in HBV carriers with haemato/oncological malignancies, who receive chemotherapy. Eighteen HBV carriers with malignancy, who were candidates for chemotherapy, were enrolled. Eight subjects (three with leukaemia, four with lymphoma and one with multiple myeloma) were enrolled for prophylactic lamivudine therapy. The remaining 10 patients (six with leukaemia, three with lymphoma and one with breast cancer) were not treated with lamivudine and were used as a control. Lamivudine was administered beginning on the same day as the chemotherapy and was maintained for a year after chemotherapy was discontinued. No HBV-related mortality was observed in either group. In the lamivudine-treated group, none of the subjects had clinical, biochemical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during the time they were receiving chemotherapy and after their chemotherapy was discontinued. In contrast, five of the 10 HBV carriers not receiving lamivudine therapy experienced a reactivation of HBV infection. This reactivation of HBV was observed during the chemotherapy in four with one individual experiencing a HBV activation 12 months after chemotherapy was discontinued. No lamivudine-related major adverse effects were observed. Hence prophylactic lamivudine treatment in HBV carriers with haemato/oncological malignancy receiving chemotherapy prevents chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation.     

Fatal hepatic decompensation in a bone marrow transplant recipient with HBV-related cirrhosis following lamivudine withdrawal

Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue with a potent antiviral activity used as prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with chronic HBV infection receiving chemotherapy. No standard guidelines exist, however, for the duration of lamivudine treatment. We report a clinical case of a 56-year-old patient with HBeAg-negative cirrhosis who developed a multiple myeloma. He was treated with lamivudine for 1 year while receiving chemotherapy and a subsequent bone marrow transplant. Complete remission from multiple myeloma was achieved. Four months after lamivudine was withdrawn, he experienced HBV reactivation with jaundice, though no YMDD mutations were detected. The patient rapidly developed fatal decompensation with septicemia and renal failure. In conclusion, this case shows that physicians should avoid discontinuing nucleoside therapy in patients with HBV infection who undergo immunosuppression for concomitant neoplastic conditions.