首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.

BACKGROUND

Hospital staffing is often lower on weekends than weekdays, and may contribute to higher mortality in patients admitted on weekends. Because esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH) requires complex management and urgent endoscopic intervention, limitations in physician expertise and the availability of endoscopy on weekends may be associated with increased EVH mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the differences in mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and costs between patients admitted on weekends versus patients who were admitted on weekdays.

METHODS

The United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients hospitalized for EVH between 1998 and 2005. Differences in mortality, LOS, and costs between patients admitted on weekends and weekdays were evaluated using regression models with adjustment for patient and clinical factors, including the timing of endoscopy.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2005, 36,734 EVH admissions to 2207 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Compared with patients admitted on weekdays, individuals admitted on the weekend were slightly less likely to undergo endoscopy on the day of admission (45% versus 43%, respectively; P=0.01) and by the second day (81% versus 75%; P<0.0001). However, mortality (11.3% versus 10.8%; P=0.20) and the requirement for endoscopic therapy (70% versus 69%; P=0.08) or portosystemic shunt insertion (4.4% versus 4.7%; P=0.32) did not differ between weekend and weekday admissions. After adjusting for confounding factors, including the timing of endoscopy, the risk of mortality was similar between weekend and weekday admissions (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.14). Although LOS was similar between groups, adjusted hospital charges were 4.0% greater (95% CI 2.3 to 5.8%) for patients hospitalized on the weekend.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EVH, admission on the weekend is associated with a small delay in receiving endoscopic intervention, but no difference in mortality or the requirement for portosystemic shunt insertion. The weekend effect observed for some medical and surgical conditions does not apply to patients with EVH.  相似文献   

2.
《Annals of hepatology》2020,19(5):523-529
Introduction and objectivesWeekend admissions has previously been associated with worse outcomes in conditions requiring specialists. Our study aimed to determine in-hospital outcomes in patients with ascites admitted over the weekends versus weekdays. Time to paracentesis from admission was studied as current guidelines recommend paracentesis within 24 h for all patients admitted with worsening ascites or signs and symptoms of sepsis/hepatic encephalopathy (HE).PatientsWe analyzed 70 million discharges from the 2005–2014 National Inpatient Sample to include all adult patients admitted non-electively for ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and HE with ascites with cirrhosis as a secondary diagnosis. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality, complication rates, and resource utilization. Odds ratios (OR) and means were adjusted for confounders using multivariate regression analysis models.ResultsOut of the total 195,083 ascites/SBP/HE-related hospitalizations, 47,383 (24.2%) occurred on weekends. Weekend group had a higher number of patients on Medicare and had higher comorbidity burden. There was no difference in mortality rate, total complication rates, length of stay or total hospitalization charges between the patients admitted on the weekend or weekdays. However, patients admitted over the weekends were less likely to undergo paracentesis (OR 0.89) and paracentesis within 24 h of admission (OR 0.71). The mean time to paracentesis was 2.96 days for weekend admissions vs. 2.73 days for weekday admissions.ConclusionsWe observed a statistically significant “weekend effect” in the duration to undergo paracentesis in patients with ascites/SBP/HE-related hospitalizations. However, it did not affect the patient's length of stay, hospitalization charges, and in-hospital mortality.  相似文献   

3.
BackgroundSome reports have shown that the risk of death is higher for patients admitted on weekends than for patients who go into the hospital on weekdays. This study was conducted to assess what independent influence, if any, weekend admission might have on mortality in our hospital.MethodsThe clinical data of 35,993 adult (> 14 years) patients admitted to the emergency department of Fundación Hospital Alcorcón from 1999 to 2003 were analyzed. We compared global mortality and mortality within the first 48 h according to whether the patients were admitted on the weekend or on a weekday. Elective admissions, critical care patients, children under 14 and births were not included.ResultsGlobal mortality was similar in both groups, but mortality within the first 48 h was higher for patients admitted on the weekend (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.18–1.62, P < 0.001), even after controlling for age, gender and comorbidity (weight of diagnosis-related group and Charlson comorbidity index).ConclusionThe risk of mortality within the first 48 h is higher for patients admitted on weekends than for patients admitted on a weekday.  相似文献   

4.

Background

Previous studies have identified a so-called weekend effect—ie, higher mortality for inpatients admitted to hospital on a weekend than on a weekday. However, the effect for acute myocardial infarction-related admissions to hospital and other health outcomes are unclear. We therefore aimed to investigate the weekend effect on adverse outcomes in inpatients with acute myocardial infarction in China.

Methods

We did a longitudinal study of 31 tertiary hospitals in Shanxi, China. We included inpatients with acute myocardial infarction who were aged 18 years or more. These eligible participants were identified from the front pages of inpatients' medical records, and we classified them into two groups: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary measures were the associations between weekend admission and in-hospital mortality, hospital-acquired infection, and extended length of stay (defined as length of stay >75 percentile). We used multivariate logistic regression models with clustered robust variance estimator to determine these associations.

Findings

Between Sept 1, 2013, and Oct 31, 2017, a total of 42 671 inpatients with acute myocardial infarction were identified (28?731 inpatients in the STEMI group and 13?940 in the NSTEMI group), and 11 294 (26·5%) inpatients were admitted to hospitals during the weekend. The crude in-hospital mortality was 1·83% (weekend 2·20% vs weekday 1·69%; p<0·0001), hospital-acquired infection was 4·99% (weekend 5·29% vs weekday 4·88%; p<0·0001), and extended length of stay was 23·58% (weekend 26·23% vs weekday 22·63%; p<0·0001). After controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, patients admitted to hospitals on weekends were significantly more likely to have an extended length of stay for both STEMI (odds ratio [OR] 1·22, 95% CI 1·13–1·30]) and NSTEMI (1·19, 1·10–1·28) groups than those admitted to hospitals on weekdays. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (STEMI group: OR 1·10 [95% CI 0·87–1·39]; NSTEMI group: 1·08 [0·84–1·41]) and hospital-acquired infection (STEMI group: 0·95 [0·79–1·15]; NSTEMI group: 0·92 [0·63–1·32]) between weekend and weekday admissions.

Interpretation

For patients admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, weekend admission is associated with a higher risk of extended length of stay than weekday admission, but not for in-hospital mortality and hospital-acquired infection. More efforts are needed to reduce the disparities of extended length of stay and improve patient safety and quality of care for weekend admissions.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (71473099).  相似文献   

5.
Previous studies have identified a "weekend effect" in terms of a poor outcome for patients hospitalized with various acute medical conditions. The aim of our study was to investigate whether weekend admissions for atrial fibrillation (AF) result in worse outcomes than those admitted on weekdays. In the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2008 database, we identified a total of 86,497 discharges with a primary discharge diagnosis of AF. The use of a cardioversion procedure for AF on weekends was lower than that on a weekday (7.9% vs 16.2%; p <0.0001; odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.55, p <0.0001). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics and disease severity, the adjusted in-hospital mortality odds were greater for weekend admissions (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.51; p <0.0001). The length of stay was significantly longer for weekend admissions. In conclusion, patients admitted with AF on weekends had lower odds of undergoing a cardioversion procedure and greater odds of dying.  相似文献   

6.
AIM: To characterize the effects of age on clinical presentations and endoscopic diagnoses and to determine outcomes after endoscopic therapy among patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) compared with those aged < 65 years. METHODS: Medical records and an endoscopy data-base of 526 consecutive patients with overt UGIB admitted during 2007-2009 were reviewed. The initial presentations and clinical course within 30 d after endoscopy were obtained. RESULTS: A total o...  相似文献   

7.
Background and aims: Patients suspected of having upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) admitted during the weekend tend to have a poor outcome in western countries. However, no Japanese studies have been reported on this matter. We aimed to evaluate differences in the clinical course of patients with UGIB between weekday and weekend admissions in Japan.

Methods: Medical records of patients who had undergone emergency endoscopy for UGIB were retrospectively reviewed. The severity of UGIB was evaluated using the Glasgow-Blatchford (GB) and AIMS65 score. Patients in whom UGIB was stopped and showed improved iron deficiency anemia after admission were considered as having a good clinical course.

Results: We reviewed 516 consecutive patients and divided them into two groups: Group A (daytime admission on a weekday: 234 patients) and Group B (nighttime or weekend admission: 282 patients). There was no significant difference in GB and AIM65 scores between the Groups. The proportions of patients with good clinical course were not significantly different between groups (A, 67.5% and B, 67.0%; p?=?.90). However, patients in Group B underwent hemostatic treatments more frequently compared with those in Group A (58.5% vs 47.4%, p?=?.012). Multivariate analysis showed that taking acid suppressants, no need for blood transfusions, use of hemostatic treatments, and GB score <12 were associated with a good clinical course.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients with UGIB admitted during daytime on weekdays and those admitted at nighttime or weekends partly owing to the sufficient performance of endoscopic hemostatic treatments.  相似文献   

8.
Studies have shown that weekend or night admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) are associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of admission time and day on patient outcomes in a medical ICU equipped with patient management guide-lines, and staffed by intensivists on call for 24 hours, who led the morning rounds on all days of the week but did not stay in-house overnight. The study enrolled 611 consecutive patients admitted to a 26-bed medical ICU in a university hospital during a 7-month period. We divided them into two groups, which we labeled as "office hours" (08:00-18:00 on weekdays) and "non-office hours" (18:00-08:00 on weekdays, and all times on weekends) according to their ICU admission times. The clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The effects of admission on weekends, at night, and various days of the week on hospital mortality were also evaluated. Our results showed that there were no significant differences in ICU and hospital mortalities between patients admitted during office hours and those admitted during non-office hours (27.2% vs. 27.4%, p = 1.000; 38.9% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.798). The ICU length of stay, ICU-free time within 21 days, and length of stay in the hospital were also comparable in both groups. Among the 392 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the ventilator outcomes were not significantly different between those in the office-hour group and the non-office-hour group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the adjusted odds of hospital mortality were not significantly higher for patients admitted to our ICU on weekends, at night, or on any days of the week. In conclusion, our results showed that non-office-hour admissions to our medical ICU were not associated with poorer ICU, hospital, and ventilator outcomes, compared with office-hour admissions. Neither were time of day and day of the week admissions to our ICU associated with significant differences in hospital mortality.  相似文献   

9.
Many studies address the effect of weekend admission on patient outcomes. This population-based study aimed to evaluate the relationship between weekend admission and the treatment process and outcomes of general internal medicine patients in Taiwan.A total of 82,340 patients (16,657 weekend and 65,683 weekday admissions) aged ≥20 years and admitted to the internal medicine departments of 17 medical centers between 2007 and 2009 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis was used to compare patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays.Patients who were admitted on weekends were more likely to undergo intubation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16–1.39; P < 0.001) and/or mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15–1.35; P < 0.001), cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.05–2.01; P = 0.026), and be transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03–1.30; P = 0.015) compared with those admitted on weekdays. Weekend-admitted patients also had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.09–1.30; P < 0.001) and hospital treatment cost (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01–1.06; P = 0.008) than weekday-admitted patients.General internal medicine patients who were admitted on weekends experienced more intensive care procedures and higher ICU admission, in-hospital mortality, and treatment cost. Intensive care utilization may serve as early indicator of poorer outcomes and a potential entry point to offer preventive intervention before proceeding to intensive treatment.  相似文献   

10.

Background

Less invasive treatment and poorer outcomes have been shown among patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on weekends compared to weekdays.

Objectives

To investigate the ‘weekend-effect’ on mortality in patients with AMI.

Methods

Using nationwide registers we identified 92,164 patients aged 30–90 years who were admitted to a Danish hospital with a first AMI from 1997 to 2009. Patients were stratified according to weekday- or weekend admissions and four time-periods to investigate for temporal changes. All-cause mortality at 2, 7, 30, and 365 days was investigated using proportional hazards Cox regression.

Results

Mortality rates were higher on weekends within seven days of admission in 1997–99 (absolute difference ranging from 0.8 to 1.1%). Weekend–weekday hazard-ratios were 1.13 (1.03–1.23) at day 2 and 1.10 (1.01–1.18) at day 7. There were no significant differences in 2000–09 and estimates suggested an attenuation of the initial ‘weekend-effect’.Overall, the use of coronary angiography (34.9% vs. 72.3%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (6.6% vs. 51.0%) within 30 days increased, as did the use of statins (49.9% vs. 80.1%.) and clopidogrel (26.7% vs. 72.7%). The cumulative mortality decreased during the study period from 5.4% to 2.5% at day of admission, from 19.5% to 11.0% at day 30 and from 28.0% to 19.0% at day 365 (all tests for trend p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

No persistent ‘weekend-effect’ on mortality was present in patients with AMI in 1997–2009. Overall, mortality rates have decreased concomitantly with an increased use of current guideline-recommended invasive and medical therapy.  相似文献   

11.
Objective of this study is to evaluate the selection of patients to be admitted to a hospital medical short-stay unit (SSU) where acute medical admissions with a predicted length of stay of between 24 and 72 h are managed. This is a retrospective observational study evaluating outcomes of all admissions to the medical SSU between January 2005 and December 2008. Factors that influence inappropriate allocation of patients to the SSU or alternative longer stay medical units were evaluated. Length of stay (LOS), mortality, Charlson score, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) (from the SSU), discharge diagnosis, and 7-day readmission rate were analysed. Over 4 years, 45% of the general medical inpatient take, 9,125 admission episodes, were managed by the medical SSU. On an average, 72% of these admissions to the SSU stayed fewer than 72 h. After excluding in-hospital deaths, there were 8,381 admissions to the general medical unit discharged within 72 h, and 77% of these were managed by the SSU during the study period. Inappropriate admissions to the SSU (LOS more than 72 h) tended to be older patients with more complex medical comorbidities. Other factors contributing to prolonged stay in the SSU included weekend admissions, and transfers to the ICU. The 7-day readmission rate was low at 3%; the all-cause hospital mortality for patients admitted to the medical SSU was 2% despite a 32% increase in workload in the medical SSU over these 4 years. In the context of fixed resources and a steeply increasing patient workload, a large proportion of general medical patients can be managed in a medical SSU with the majority being discharged home within 72 h while keeping all-cause in-hospital mortality and readmission rates low. More accurate identification of appropriate patients on admission by using a physiological clinical score and addressing operational issues particularly on weekends could lead to a more efficient SSU.  相似文献   

12.
Most hospitals have reduced medical staff on weekends. Furthermore, a recent study on acute myocardial infarction suggested that weekend admissions were associated with higher mortality compared with weekday admissions. We sought to determine if compliance with guideline recommendations for acute coronary syndrome performance measures would be worse on weekends/holidays compared with weekdays. We utilized the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines (GWTG) - Coronary Artery Disease database. This study included 154,910 patients admitted to 515 various hospitals from January 14, 2000 to April 30, 2007 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients discharged on weekdays were older and were more likely to be women, have a history of atrial fibrillation, cerebral vascular accident/transient ischemic attack and chronic renal insufficiency, and present with unstable angina. Although patients discharged on the weekends/holidays were slightly less likely to receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors than those discharged on weekdays (68.3% vs 69.5%, p <0.0001), all other measures were similar, and a composite performance measure for 100% compliance was equal in both groups (81.5% vs 81.4%, p = 0.77). In conclusion, within GWTG participating hospitals, weekend/holiday staffing provides the same quality of care in ACS for discharge medications and counseling compared with full weekday staffing. However, there remain further opportunities to improve utilization of guideline-recommended therapies irrespective of discharge day.  相似文献   

13.
BACKGROUND A low proportion of patients admitted to hospital with cirrhosis receive quality care with timely paracentesis an important target for improvement. We hypothesized that a medical educational intervention, delivered to medical residents caring for patients with cirrhosis, would improve quality of care.AIM To determine if an educational intervention can improve quality of care in cirrhotic patients admitted to hospital with ascites.METHODS We performed a pilot prospective cohort study with time-based randomization over six months at a large teaching hospital. Residents rotating on hospital medicine teams received an educational intervention while residents rotating on hospital medicine teams on alternate months comprised the control group. The primary outcome was provision of quality care-defined as adherence to all quality-based indicators derived from evidence-based practice guidelines-in admissions for patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Patient clinical outcomesincluding length of hospital stay(LOS); 30-d readmission; in-hospital mortality and overall mortality-and resident educational outcomes were also evaluated.RESULTS Eighty-five admissions(60 unique patients) met inclusion criteria over the study period-46 admissions in the intervention group and 39 admissions in the control group. Thirty-seven admissions were female patients, and 44 admissions were for alcoholic liver disease. Mean model for end-stage liver disease(MELD)-Na score at admission was 25.8. Forty-seven(55.3%) admissions received quality care.There was no difference in the provision of quality care(56.41% vs 54.35%, P =0.9) between the two groups. 30-d readmission was lower in the intervention group(35% vs 52.78%, P = 0.1) and after correction for age, gender and MELD-Na score [RR = 0.62(0.39, 1.00), P = 0.05]. No significant differences were seen for LOS, complications, in-hospital mortality or overall mortality between the two groups. Resident medical knowledge and self-efficacy with paracentesis improved after the educational intervention.CONCLUSION Medical education has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with cirrhosis and ascites.  相似文献   

14.
Objective: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with in-hospital mortality between 3 and 14%. However, the long-term mortality and causes of death are unknown. We investigated the long-term mortality and causes of death in UGIB patients in a retrospective single-centre case-control study design.

Methods: A total of 569 consecutive patients, aged ≥18 years, admitted to Kuopio University Hospital for their first endoscopically verified UGIB during the years 2009–2011 were identified from hospital records. For each UGIB patient, an age, sex and hospital district matched control patient was identified from the Statistics Finland database. Data on endoscopy procedures, laboratory values, comorbidities and medication were obtained from patient records. Data on deaths and causes of death were obtained from Statistics Finland.

Results: In-hospital mortality of UGIB patients was low at 3.3%. The long-term (mean follow-up 32 months) mortality of UGIB patients was significantly higher than controls (34.1 versus 12.1%, p?<?.001). During the 6 months following UGIB, the risk of death compared to controls was highest (HR 19.2, 95% CI 7.0–52.4, p?<?.001) and remained higher up to 3 years after the bleeding. Beyond 3 years’ follow-up, there was no difference in mortality between the groups (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4–1.6, p?=?.436). During the first 3 months after the UGIB episode, mortality was related to gastrointestinal diseases; after 3 months, the causes of death were related to comorbidities and did not differ from causes of death in controls.

Conclusions: UGIB patients have three times higher long-term mortality than population controls.  相似文献   

15.
BackgroundRecent interest in the ‘weekend effect’ has been expanded to cardiovascular intensive care units, yet the impact of off-hours admission on mortality and cardiovascular ICU (CICU) length of stay remains uncertain.ObjectivesWe examine the association between CICU admission day and time with mortality. Additionally, length-of-stay was also evaluated in relation to admission time.MethodsA single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted including 10,638 adult patients admitted to a CICU in a tertiary-care academic medical center from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2019. ICU mortality and length-of-stay were assessed by admission day and time adjusting for comorbid conditions and other clinical variables. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the factors associated with mortality and a generalized linear model (GLM) with log link function and gamma distribution was used to evaluate the factors associated with ICU length of stay.ResultsCompared to weekday-day admissions, we observed an increased mortality for weekend-day for all admissions (6.5 vs 9.6%, Adjusted OR: 1.32 (1.03–1.72)), and for medical CICU admissions (7.6 vs 9.9%, Adjusted OR: 1.35 (1.02–1.79)). Additionally, compared to weekday-day, weekday-night admission was associated with 7% longer ICU length of stay in surgical ICU patients, 7% shorter length of stay in medical ICU patients.ConclusionAdmission to this open-model CICU during weekend hours (Saturday 08:00-Sunday 17:59) versus nights or weekdays is associated with increased mortality. ICU staffing care models should not significantly change based on the day of the week.  相似文献   

16.
The day of the week of admission may influence the length of stay and in-hospital death. However, the association between the admission day of the week and in-hospital outcomes has been inconsistent in heart failure (HF) patients among studies reported from Western countries. We thus analyzed this association in HF patients encountered in routine clinical practice in Japan. We studied the characteristics and in-hospital treatment in 1620 patients hospitalized with worsening HF by using the database of the Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD). Patients were divided into two groups according to weekday (n = 1355; 83.6 %) or weekend admission (n = 265; 16.4 %). The mean age was 70.7 years and 59.4 % were male. Etiology was ischemic in 34.0 %, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 42.5 %. Patients admitted on the weekend were significantly older and had more comorbidities, and more severe symptoms and signs of HF on admission. Length of stay was comparable between weekend and weekday admission (35.2 ± 47.0 days vs 33.6 ± 32.0 days, P = 0.591). Crude in-hospital mortality did not differ between patients admitted on the weekend and weekdays (7.5 % vs 5.2 %, P = 0.136). Even after adjustment for covariates in multivariable modeling with patients admitted on weekday as the reference, in-hospital death was comparable between patients admitted on the weekend and weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1.125, 95 % confidence interval 0.631–2.004, P = 0.691). Among patients hospitalized for worsening HF, admission day of the week did not affect in-hospital death and length of stay.  相似文献   

17.
18.
AIM: To evaluate whether weekend or nighttime admission affects prognosis of peptic ulcer bleeding despite early endoscopy.METHODS: Retrospective data collection from four referral centers, all of which had a formal out-of-hours emergency endoscopy service, even at weekends. A total of 388 patients with bleeding peptic ulcers who were admitted via the emergency room between January 2007 and December 2009 were enrolled. Analyzed parameters included time from patients’ arrival until endoscopy, mortality, rebleeding, need for surgery and length of hospital stay.RESULTS: The weekday and weekend admission groups comprised 326 and 62 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, except for younger age in the weekend group. Most patients (97%) had undergone early endoscopy, which resulted in a low mortality rate regardless of point of presentation (1.8% overall vs 1.6% on the weekend). The only outcome that was worse in the weekend group was a higher rate of rebleeding (12% vs 21%, P = 0.030). However, multivariate analysis revealed nighttime admission and a high Rockall score (≥ 6) as significant independent risk factors for rebleeding, rather than weekend admission.CONCLUSION: Early endoscopy for peptic ulcer bleeding can prevent the weekend effect, and nighttime admission was identified as a novel risk factor for rebleeding, namely the nighttime effect.  相似文献   

19.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:

Patients admitted to hospital during the ‘after hours’ (weekends and evenings) may be at increased risk for adverse outcome. The objective of the present study was to assess whether community-onset bloodstream infections presenting in the after hours are associated with death.

METHODS:

All patients in the Victoria area of British Columbia, who had first admissions with community-onset bloodstream infections between 1998 and 2005 were included. The day of admission to hospital, the day and time of culture draw, and all-cause, in-hospital mortality were ascertained.

RESULTS:

A total of 2108 patients were studied. Twenty-six per cent of patients were admitted on a weekend. Blood cultures were drawn on a weekend in 27% of cases and, in 43%, 33%, and 25% of cases, cultures were drawn during the day (08:00 to 17:59), the evening (18:00 to 22:59) and night (23:00 to 07:59), respectively. More than two-thirds (69%) of index cultures were drawn during the after hours (any time Saturday or Sunday and weekdays 18:00 to 07:59). The overall in-hospital case fatality rate was 13%. No difference in mortality was observed in relation to the day of the week of admission or time period of sampling. After-hours sampling was not associated with mortality in a multivariable logistic regression model examining factors associated with death.

CONCLUSION:

Presentation with community-onset, bloodstream infection during the after hours does not increase the risk of death.  相似文献   

20.
Aims: To determine whether in‐hospital deaths of patients admitted through emergency departments with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute myocardial infarction, intracerebral haemorrhage and acute hip fracture are increased by weekend versus weekday admission (the ‘weekend effect’). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of statewide administrative data from public hospitals in Queensland, Australia, during the 2002/2003–2006/2007 financial years. The primary outcome was 30‐day in‐hospital mortality. The secondary outcome of 2‐day in‐hospital mortality helped determine whether increased mortality of weekend admissions was closely linked to weekend medical care. Results: During the study period, there were 30 522 COPD, 17 910 acute myocardial infarction, 4183 acute hip fracture and 1781 intracerebral haemorrhage admissions. There was no significant weekend effect on 30‐day in‐hospital mortality for COPD (adjusted risk ratio = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81–1.04, P= 0.222), intracerebral haemorrhage (adjusted risk ratio = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.16, P= 0.935) or acute hip fracture (adjusted risk ratio = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.54–1.03, P= 0.13). There was a significant weekend effect for acute myocardial infarction (adjusted risk ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03–1.26, P= 0.007). Two‐day in‐hospital mortality showed similar results. Conclusion: This is the first Australian study on the ‘weekend effect’ (in a cohort other than neonates), and the first study worldwide to assess specifically the weekend effect among COPD patients. Observed patterns were consistent with overseas research. There was a significant weekend effect for myocardial infarction. Further research is needed to determine whether location (e.g. rural), clinical (e.g. disease severity) and service provision factors (e.g. access to invasive procedures) influence the weekend effect for acute medical conditions in Australia.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号