Pain,Nausea, and Hospital Admission after Uterine Fibroid Embolization: A Comparison of 2 Protocols

Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) procedures performed from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Seventy-two patients were treated with a standard protocol consisting of sedation, ketorolac, ondansetron, and overnight parenteral analgesics and antiemetics. Ninety-six patients were treated with a new protocol, which added transdermal scopolamine, lorazepam, and intravenous acetaminophen. Outpatient uterine fibroid embolization (OP-UFE) not requiring hospitalization was successful in 81.4% and 2.7% of patients treated with the new and old protocols, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 141.4; P < .0001). Procedural fentanyl doses were lower with the new protocol than with the old one (mean, 148 vs 186 mcg; P = .0016). In the new protocol subset, patients were 1.01 times more likely to fail OP-UFE for every microgram increase in procedural fentanyl (OR, 0.99, P = .009), and those presenting with pain were less likely to succeed with OP-UFE than those with bleeding or bulk symptoms (OR, 0.31, P = .04). In conclusion, decreasing the opioid dose while increasing the antiemetic and nonopioid analgesic medications improves the chances of same day discharge after UFE.     

Uterine Fibroid Embolization or Myomectomy: How Much Marketing Is Enough? Comparative Analysis of Public Search Trends in Google and Medical Publications in PubMed

To compare public popularity and volume of scientific publications regarding uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) and myomectomy. Google Trends and PubMed data were queried to assess temporal variations in online public search volumes and number of research publications for UFE and myomectomy. Time series analysis was used to identify meaningful temporal trends and forecast a future trend. Compared with UFE, myomectomy had significantly higher volumes of public online search and research publications, with an increasing trend over time (P < .0001). The forecasting models predicted a continuing increase in both public search volumes and number of research publications for myomectomy and static future trends in these metrics for UFE. This study signals significantly lower public popularity and research efforts for UFE compared with myomectomy for uterine fibroids. More effective marketing strategies and further research support will be needed to fill this gap.     

Pregnancy Rate and Outcomes following Uterine Artery Embolization for Uterine Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo systematically review published studies on the pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for uterine arteriovenous malformations (UAVMs).Materials and MethodsInternational medical databases were searched for all English-language studies published between 2000 and 2022 on patients with UAVMs who had undergone embolization and had a subsequent pregnancy. Data on the pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, and physiologic status of newborns were extracted from the articles. Ten case series were included in the meta-analysis, and 18 case reports on pregnancy following UAE were reviewed.ResultsIn the case series, 44 pregnancies were reported in 189 patients. The pooled estimate of pregnancy rate was 23.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3%–29.3%). The pregnancy rate was higher in studies of women with a mean age of ≤30 years (50.6% vs 22.2%; P < .05). The pooled estimate of live birth rate was 88.6% (95% CI, 78.6%–98.7%).ConclusionsAll published series report preservation of fertility and successful pregnancies after embolization of UAVMs. The live birth rate in these series does not differ substantially from that of the general population.     

Investigating the Underutilization of Uterine Fibroid Embolization by Surveying Practice Preferences of Obstetricians/Gynecologists

This study aimed to survey the practice preferences of obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) that may be contributing to the underutilization of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (SUFs). A 22-question survey was created using the Qualtrics XM software and distributed to an obstetrics/gynecology–specific social media group of resident or attending OB/GYNs practicing in the United States. One hundred twelve responses met the inclusion criteria. For patients with SUFs, UFE was offered as a first-choice option <2% of the time. For patients with SUFs seeking to maintain fertility, UFE was recommended only 1% of the time after medical therapy (54%) and myomectomy (42%). Respondents reported lower rates of confidence (selecting “strongly agree” or “agree”) regarding risks and benefits of UFE (77%) in comparison with those of myomectomy (99%) or hysterectomy (100%). Because UFE was seldom recommended by respondents, further, more robust polling of OB/GYNs is warranted.     

Deep Learning Based on MR Imaging for Predicting Outcome of Uterine Fibroid Embolization

PurposeTo develop and validate a deep learning model based on routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging obtained before uterine fibroid embolization to predict procedure outcome.Materials and MethodsClinical data were collected on patients treated with uterine fibroid embolization at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 2007 to 2018. Fibroids for each patient were manually segmented by an abdominal radiologist on a T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1C) sequence and a T2-weighted sequence of MR imaging obtained before and after embolization. A residual convolutional neural network (ResNet) model to predict clinical outcome was trained using MR imaging obtained before the procedure.ResultsInclusion criteria were met by 727 fibroids in 409 patients. At clinical follow-up, 85.6% (n = 350) of 409 patients (590 of 727 fibroids; 81.1%) experienced symptom resolution or improvement, and 14.4% (n = 59) of 409 patients (137 of 727 fibroids; 18.9%) had no improvement or worsening symptoms. The T1C trained model achieved a test accuracy of 0.847 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.745–0.914), sensitivity of 0.932 (95% CI, 0.833–0.978), and specificity of 0.462 (95% CI, 0.232–0.709). In comparison, the average of 4 radiologists achieved a test accuracy of 0.722 (95% CI, 0.609–0.813), sensitivity of 0.852 (95% CI, 0.737–0.923), and specificity of 0.135 (95% CI, 0.021–0.415).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that deep learning based on a ResNet model achieves good accuracy in predicting outcome of uterine fibroid embolization. If further validated, the model may help clinicians better identify patients who can most benefit from this therapy and aid clinical decision making.     

Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Transradial,Transbrachial, and Transfemoral Approach for Mesenteric Arterial Procedures

PurposeTo assess feasibility and safety of transradial access (TRA) compared with transfemoral access (TFA) and transbrachial access (TBA) for mesenteric arterial endovascular procedures.Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent a mesenteric arterial procedure in a tertiary referral center between May 2012 and February 2018. Exclusion criteria were absence of data and lost to follow-up within 24 hours after the procedure. During the study period, 103 patients underwent 148 mesenteric arterial procedures (TBA, n = 52; TFA, n = 39; TRA, n = 57). Mean patient age was 64.3 years ± 13.3, and 91 patients (62%) were women. Primary outcomes were vascular access specified technical success rate and access site complication rate, as reported in hospital records.ResultsTechnical success rate specified for the vascular access technique did not differ between the 3 approaches (TBA 96%, TFA 87%, TRA 91%; TRA vs TBA, P = .295; TBA vs TFA, P = .112; TRA vs TFA, P = .524), and overall access site complication rate was not different between the 3 approaches (TBA 42%, TFA 23%, TRA 35%; TRA vs TBA, P = .439; TBA vs TFA, P = .055; TRA vs TFA, P = .208). However, more major access site complications were reported for TBA than for TRA or TFA (TBA 17%, TFA 3%, TRA 2%; TRA vs TBA, P = .005; TBA vs TFA, P = .026; TRA vs TFA, P = .785).ConclusionsTRA is a safe and feasible approach for mesenteric arterial procedures comparable to TFA, but with a significantly lower major access site complication rate than TBA.     

Risk Factors Associated with Clinical Failure of Uterine Artery Embolization for Postpartum Hemorrhage

PurposeTo identify risk factors for clinical failure of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), with particular attention to the uterine artery diameter.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent UAE for PPH between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2021. Technical success was defined as the completion of embolization of the arteries thought to be the cause of the bleeding. Clinical success was defined as no recurrent bleeding or need for additional therapeutic interventions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the risk factors associated with clinical failure of UAE.ResultsOf the 47 patients, 6 had recurrent bleeding. Of the 6 patients, 4 underwent hysterectomy, and 2 underwent repeat embolization. The clinical success rate was 87.2% (41/47), with no major adverse events such as uterine infarction or death. In univariate analysis, there were slight differences in multiparity (P = .115) and placental abruption (P = .128) and a significant difference in the findings of a narrow uterine artery on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (P = .005). In multivariate analysis, only a narrow uterine artery on DSA was a significant factor (odds ratio, 18.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–134.8; P = .004).ConclusionsA narrow uterine artery on DSA was a risk factor for clinically unsuccessful UAE for PPH. It may be prudent to conclude the procedure only after it is ensured that vasospasm has been relieved.     

Feasibility of Transtibial Access for Uterine Artery Embolization

Ten women with a mean body mass index of 31.5 kg/m² and symptomatic uterine pathology underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE) via transtibial access (TTA). Nine out of 10 UAEs were successfully performed via TTA, with 2 minor adverse events. Outpatients with leiomyomas had stable to improved symptoms at follow-up; hospitalized patients with abnormal uterine bleeding from malignant tumors or arteriovenous malformations were discharged shortly after UAE with the cessation of hemorrhage. TTA is a feasible alternative for UAE for patients with obesity, diminutive radial arteries, or atherosclerosis that may confer an added risk of rare neurologic adverse events from transradial access.     

Uterine Artery Embolization for Pedunculated Subserosal Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo provide a comprehensive overview of the literature assessing the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for patients with pedunculated subserosal fibroids.Materials and MethodsMEDLINE and Embase databases were searched without language or publication type restrictions for observational studies to estimate safety (adverse events) and efficacy (devascularization, fibroid volume reduction, and uterine volume reduction) outcomes. Case reports were included to qualitatively report adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed for single proportions and mean changes with random-effects modeling.ResultsOf 98 eligible articles, 11 studies were included in the final analysis. Of the adverse events detailed in these cases, 5 events were mild, 2 were moderate (torsion of pedunculated fibroid requiring laparoscopic myomectomy and persistent bleeding after embolization requiring hysterectomy), and 1 was severe (fibroid necrosis causing bowel obstruction requiring bowel resection and hysterectomy). There were no deaths reported in the literature. The pooled risk of adverse events was 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29%–9.2%; 4 of 181; I² = 0%). The pooled devascularization rate was 75.9% (95% CI, 62.4%–85.6%; 140 of 189; I² = 75%) at 3.91 months of follow-up. The percent volume reduction of the dominant pedunculated fibroid was 38.6% (95% CI, 33.0%–44.2%; I² = 0%) at 4.3 months of follow-up. The percent uterine volume reduction was 36.7% (95% CI, 30.3%–43.0%; I² = 47%) at 3.5 months of follow-up.ConclusionsUAE for pedunculated subserosal fibroids has a low risk of adverse events and effectively reduces fibroid and uterine size.     

Transradial versus Transfemoral Access for Patients with Liver Cancer Undergoing Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy: Patient Experience and Procedural Complications

PurposeTo determine whether transradial access (TRA) is a more favorable and safe method for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) than transfemoral access (TFA).Materials and MethodsRetrospective and prospective cohorts of patients with liver cancer were included. Sixty-seven patients in the retrospective cohort were divided into 2 groups: (a) TRA-HAIC (n = 24) and (b) TFA-HAIC (n = 43). Another 33 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive both TRA and TFA for HAIC in a crossover design. Prolonged arterial access was required for up to 48 hours. The primary endpoint was quality of life (QOL) using the visual analog scale. The secondary endpoints mainly included procedural success, adverse events, and operation time.ResultsPatient QOL measures revealed significantly lower scores of indices in the TRA-HAIC group than in the TFA-HAIC group in the retrospective cohort (all P < .001). The significant improvement of the QOL indices by TRA-HAIC, such as overall discomfort (P = .019) and pain at the access site (P = .018), was validated in the prospective cohort. The satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the TRA-HAIC group than in the TFA-HAIC group, and patients preferred TRA-HAIC (P < .001). Radial artery occlusion (RAO) as an access-related adverse event occurred more frequently in both the retrospective and prospective cohorts (38% and 33%, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). Notably, the multivariate analysis of RAO-associated factors showed that enoxaparin use was significantly correlated with a reduced risk of postprocedural RAO (P = .036).ConclusionsTRA was superior to TFA in patient experience. However, because of the high incidence of access-related adverse events, especially for RAO with a total incidence of 35%, strategies should be optimized for patients to benefit from TRA in future procedures.     

Clinical Outcomes of Transarterial Embolization for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy Refractory to Conservative Treatment: A Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) for chronic Achilles tendinopathy (AT) refractory to conservative treatment.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 20 patients (12 men and 8 women; mean age, 30.3 years) who received TAE using imipenem/cilastatin sodium for refractory chronic AT from May 2019 to April 2021. Nine patients had bilateral involvement. A total of 29 procedures were performed (8 for nonathletes and 21 for athletes). If feasible, embolization was performed superselectively of the arterial branch demonstrating hypervascularity, early venous drainage, and/or supplying the pain site noted using a radiopaque marker. The visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10) score was used to assess pain symptoms at baseline and during the follow-up period (1 day; 1 week; 1, 3, and 6 months; and open period). Clinical success was defined as a decrease of >50% in the VAS score at 6 months when compared with baseline.ResultsIn 25 (86.2%) of 29 procedures, clinical success was achieved. Significant decreases in the VAS scores were noted at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (6.86 at the baseline vs 3.48, 3.41, 3.10, 2.55, and 1.62, respectively; all P < .01). For patients available for the 12- and 24-month follow-ups (n = 19 and 6, respectively), the mean VAS scores significantly decreased (6.84 vs 2.00 and 7.33 vs 1.17, respectively; all P < .01). No serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.ConclusionsTAE may alleviate pain for patients with chronic AT refractory to the conservative treatment with a low risk of adverse events.     

Prostatic Artery Embolization—Anatomic Predictors of Technical Outcomes

PurposeTo determine if cone-beam CT and digital subtraction angiography analysis of pelvic arterial anatomy has predictive value for radiation exposure and technical success of prostatic artery embolization (PAE).Materials and MethodsThis prospective, nonrandomized, single-center study included 104 consecutive patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cone-beam CT was performed in 160/208 (76.9%) hemipelves to determine prostatic artery (PA) origin. Classification of pelvic arterial tortuosity was possible in 73/104 (70.2%) patients. Learning curves of 2 interventionalists who performed 86.5% of PAEs were analyzed.ResultsTortuosity of pelvic arteries was classified as mild in 25 (34.2%) patients median age 64 years, moderate in 40 (54.8%) patients median age 69 years, and severe in 8 (11.0%) patients median age 70 years (mild vs moderate, P = .002; mild vs severe, P = .019); median fluoroscopy times were 24, 36, and 46 minutes (P = .008, P = .023); median contrast volumes were 105, 122.5, and 142 mL (P = .029, P = .064); and bilateral PAE rates were 84.0%, 77.5%, and 62.5% (P = .437), respectively. PA origin from superior vesical artery was most frequent (27.5%) and showed higher dose area product (median 402.4 vs 218 Gy ∙ cm², P = .033) and fluoroscopy time (median 42.5 vs 27 min, P = .01) compared with PA origin from obturator artery, which was least frequent. Interventionalist experience revealed significant impact on procedure times (median 159 vs 130 min, P = .006).ConclusionsTortuosity of pelvic arteries was more frequent in older patients and predicted worse technical outcomes of PAE. PA origin from obturator artery was associated with lower dose area product and fluoroscopy time, especially compared with PA origin from superior vesical artery. Interventionalist experience showed significant influence on technical outcome.     

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Secondary Stiff Shoulder

PurposeTo assess the clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for secondary stiff shoulder (SSS).Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data performed between January 2017 and December 2019. This study comprised 25 patients (20 women and 5 men; median age, 49 years; range 27–59) with SSS resistant to conservative management during at least 3 months. The median time of stiffness was 12 months. The etiology of SSS was postoperative in 14 patients (56%) and posttraumatic in the remaining 11 patients (44%). Periods of immobilization in all patients were associated. TAE was performed, and technical aspects, adverse events, changes for pain, and physical examination before and 6 months after TAE were assessed.ResultsAbnormal vessels were observed in 20 of 25 (80%) of the procedures. Transitory cutaneous erythema was noted in 4 patients treated after TAE. Significant differences were observed in the median pain visual analog scale reduction between before and 6 months after TAE (8 vs 2, P < .001). Shoulder mobility significantly improved in both flexion and abduction degrees between before and at 6 months after TAE in (70° vs 150°; P < .001). No symptoms of recurrence appeared.ConclusionsTAE can result in pain reduction and mobility improvement in patients with SSS refractory to conservative therapy.     

Evaluation of the Effect of Routine Antibiotic Administration after Uterine Artery Embolization on Infection Rates

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of routine administration of post-procedural antibiotics following elective uterine artery embolization (UAE) on infectious complication rates.Materials and MethodsThe charts of patients who underwent UAE between January 2013 and September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior to January 15, 2016, all patients received post-procedural antibiotics with 500 mg of ciprofloxacin twice a day orally for 5 days. After January 15, 2016, none of the patients received post-procedural antibiotics. All patients in both groups received pre-procedural intravenous antibiotics. The post-procedural antibiotics group included 217 patients (age, 44.7 ± 6 years); the no-antibiotics group included 158 patients (age, 45.4 ± 5.6 years). Patients in the no-antibiotics group had a significantly higher rate of diabetes mellitus (P = .03) but fewer cases of adenomyosis (P = .048). Otherwise, demographic and fibroid characteristics were similar between the groups.ResultsSix infectious complications (6/375, 1.6%) were recorded. No statistically significant difference (P = .66) was observed in the number of infections between the post-procedural antibiotics group (4/217, 1.8%) and the no-antibiotics group (2/158, 1.3%). Three of the 6 infectious complications presented with malodorous vaginal discharge (3/375, 0.8%) and received nominal therapy. The 3 remaining complications (0.8%) were considered major and included 2 patients (0.5%) who underwent hysterectomy and 1 patient (0.3%) who underwent myomectomy. The major infection rate was 0.9% (2/217) in the post-procedural antibiotics group and 0.7% (1/158) in the no-antibiotics group (P = 1). There were no 90-day post-procedural mortalities.ConclusionsDiscontinuation of routine post-procedural antibiotics with ciprofloxacin after elective UAE did not result in increased rates of infectious complications within the first 90 days post procedure.     

Utilization and Comparative Effectiveness of Uterine Artery Embolization versus Hysterectomy for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage: A National Inpatient Sample Study

PurposeTo identify differences in mortality or length of hospital stay for mothers treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) or hysterectomy for severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), as well as to analyze whether geographic or clinical determinants affected the type of therapy received.Materials and MethodsThis National Inpatient Sample study from 2005 to 2017 included all patients with live-birth deliveries. Severe PPH was defined as PPH that required transfusion, hysterectomy, or UAE. Propensity score weighting–adjusted demographic, maternal, and delivery risk factors were used to assess mortality and prolonged hospital stay.ResultsOf 9.8 million identified live births, PPH occurred in 31.0 per 1,000 cases. The most common intervention for PPH was transfusion (116.4 per 1,000 cases of PPH). Hysterectomy was used more frequently than UAE (20.4 vs 12.9 per 1,000 cases). The following factors predicted that hysterectomy would be used more commonly than UAE: previous cesarean delivery, breech fetal position, placenta previa, transient hypertension during pregnancy without pre-eclampsia, pre-existing hypertension without pre-eclampsia, pre-existing hypertension with pre-eclampsia, unspecified maternal hypertension, and gestational diabetes (all P < .001). Delivery risk factors associated with greater utilization of hysterectomy over UAE included postterm pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, cervical laceration, forceps vaginal delivery, and shock (all P < .001). There was no difference in mortality between hysterectomy and UAE. After balancing demographic, maternal, and delivery risk factors, the odds of prolonged hospital stay were 0.38 times lower with UAE than hysterectomy (P < .001).ConclusionsDespite similar mortality and shorter hospital stays, UAE is used far less than hysterectomy in the management of severe PPH.     

Timing of Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyoma during the Menstrual Cycle

PurposeTo investigate differences in outcomes of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for leiomyoma when performed during different phases of the menstrual cycle.Materials and MethodsIn this single-institution retrospective analysis, 111 premenopausal patients (median [range] age, 44 [33–52] years) undergoing UAE for symptomatic leiomyoma between June 2014 and February 2020 were included. Twenty-one patients underwent UAE in the menstrual phase (the early follicular phase), 27 in the late follicular phase, and 63 in the luteal phase. Baseline characteristics and technical and peri-procedural outcomes were compared among groups. Leiomyoma infarction on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging 1 week after UAE and 4-month outcomes, including changes in the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire scores, the volume reduction rates of the uterus and largest leiomyoma, follicle stimulating hormone values, adverse events, and amenorrhea, were compared among groups.ResultsA 4-month follow-up was completed for all patients. No significant differences were observed among groups in baseline characteristics or technical and peri-procedural outcomes. There were no significant differences in the multivariate-adjusted 1-week infarction rates of all leiomyoma volumes (P = .161) or multivariate-adjusted 4-month outcomes, including changes in the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire symptoms and total scores (P = .864 and P = .798, respectively), the volume reduction rates of the uterus and the largest leiomyoma (P = .865 and P = .965, respectively), and follicle stimulating hormone values (P = .186) among the groups. No significant differences were noted in the 4-month adverse events (P = .260) or amenorrhea (P = .793) among the groups.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated no significant differences in the outcomes of UAE for leiomyoma when performed during different phases of the menstrual cycle.     

Intra-Arterial Lidocaine Administration for Anesthesia after Uterine Artery Embolization with Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Leiomyoma

PurposeTo evaluate whether administration of lidocaine into the uterine artery for anesthesia immediately after uterine artery embolization (UAE) with trisacryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) for leiomyoma is safe and effective.Materials and MethodsIn a single-institution retrospective study, 100 patients underwent UAE using TAGM with a pruned tree endpoint between June 2014 and April 2019. The first 50 patients (control group) underwent UAE without lidocaine; in the second 50 patients (study group), lidocaine was administered into the uterine artery immediately after UAE. Baseline characteristics and technical and periprocedural outcomes were compared. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 hours after UAE were compared between the groups with repeated measures analysis of variance. Each multivariate-adjusted VAS score < 24 hours was compared with analysis of covariance.ResultsNo significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics or technical and periprocedural outcomes, including the volume of morphine used (P = .415), between the groups. No significant differences were found in crude or multivariate-adjusted VAS scores at each time point < 24 hours. Only the multivariate-adjusted VAS score 3 hours after UAE was 0.7 lower in the study group (mean ± SE, 2.2 ± 0.3 vs 2.9 ± 0.3); however, no significant difference was noted (P = .070). No adverse events associated with lidocaine were detected.ConclusionsIntra-arterial lidocaine administration immediately after UAE with TAGM for leiomyoma was safe, but did not contribute to significant reductions in pain or volume of narcotic agent administered.