Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial

PurposeTo evaluate relationships between immediate venographic results and clinical outcomes of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT).Materials and MethodsVenograms from 317 patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who received PCDT in a multicenter randomized trial were reviewed. Quantitative thrombus resolution was assessed by independent readers using a modified Marder scale. The physician operators recorded their visual assessments of thrombus regression and venous flow. These immediate post-procedure results were correlated with patient outcomes at 1, 12, and 24 months.ResultsPCDT produced substantial thrombus removal (P < .001 for pre-PCDT vs. post-PCDT thrombus scores in all segments). At procedure end, spontaneous venous flow was present in 99% of iliofemoral venous segments and in 89% of femoral–popliteal venous segments. For the overall proximal DVT population, and for the femoral–popliteal DVT subgroup, post-PCDT thrombus volume did not correlate with 1-month or 24-month outcomes. For the iliofemoral DVT subgroup, over 1 and 24 months, symptom severity scores were higher (worse), and venous disease-specific quality of life (QOL) scores were lower (worse) in patients with greater post-PCDT thrombus volume, with the difference reaching statistical significance for the 24-month Villalta post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) severity score (P = .0098). Post-PCDT thrombus volume did not correlate with 12-month valvular reflux.ConclusionsPCDT successfully removes thrombus in acute proximal DVT. However, the residual thrombus burden at procedure end does not correlate with the occurrence of PTS during the subsequent 24 months. In iliofemoral DVT, lower residual thrombus burden correlates with reduced PTS severity and possibly also with improved venous QOL and fewer early symptoms.     

Predictors of Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial

PurposeTo identify the baseline patient characteristics that predict who will benefit from pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Materials and MethodsIn the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) multicenter randomized trial, 381 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT underwent PCDT and anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone. The correlations between baseline factors and venous clinical outcomes were evaluated over 24 months using post hoc regression analyses. Interaction terms were examined to evaluate for differential effects by treatment arm.ResultsPatients with clinically severe DVT (higher baseline Villalta score) experienced greater effects of PCDT in improving 24-month venous outcomes, including moderate or severe postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] per unit increase in the baseline Villalta scores were as follows: for PCDT, OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01–1.15]; for control, OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12–1.29]; P_interaction = .03), PTS severity (between-arm differences in the Villalta [P_interaction = .004] and Venous Clinical Severity Scale [VCSS] [P_interaction = .002)] scores), and quality of life (between-arm difference in the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life score; P_interaction = .025). Patients with previous DVT had greater effects of PCDT on 24-month PTS severity than those in patients without previous DVT (mean [95% CI] between-arm difference in the Villalta score, 4.2 [1.56–6.84] vs 0.9 [?0.44 to 2.26], P_interaction = .03; mean [95% CI] between-arm difference in the VCSS score, 2.6 [0.94–4.21] vs 0.3 [?0.58 to 1.14], P_interaction = .02). The effects of PCDT on some but not all outcomes were greater in patients presenting with left-sided DVT (Villalta PTS severity, P_interaction = .04; venous ulcer, P_interaction = .0499) or a noncompressible popliteal vein (PTS, P_interaction = .02). The effects of PCDT did not vary by sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, symptom duration, hypertension, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia.ConclusionsIn patients with acute iliofemoral DVT, greater presenting clinical severity (higher baseline Villalta score) and a history of previous DVT predict enhanced benefits from PCDT.     

Ovine Iliac Vein Model for Endovascular Thrombectomy of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

An ovine iliac vein thrombosis model was devised to test a wall-contacting rotational thrombectomy device. Thrombosis was successfully induced in 9 sheep with an average clot length of 31 mm ± 12 and >60% vessel occlusion on angiography. The thrombus was subsequently removed, maintaining normal intraoperative pulmonary arterial pressure (5.9 mm Hg ± 3.6) and complete distal reperfusion after thrombectomy. Additionally, the sheep were without signs of vascular trauma or embolic complications on gross necropsy and histopathologic analysis. The findings from this study support the use of an ovine iliac deep vein thrombosis model for testing of a lower extremity thrombectomy device.     

Automated Quantitative Imaging Measurements of Disease Severity in Patients with Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Compression

PurposeAn automated segmentation technique (AST) for computed tomography (CT) venography was developed to quantify measures of disease severity before and after stent placement in patients with left-sided nonthrombotic iliac vein compression.Materials and MethodsTwenty-one patients with left-sided nonthrombotic iliac vein compression who underwent venous stent placement were retrospectively identified. Pre- and poststent CT venography studies were quantitatively analyzed using an AST to determine leg volume, skin thickness, and water content of fat. These measures were compared between diseased and nondiseased limbs and between pre- and poststent images, using patients as their own controls. Additionally, patients with and without postthrombotic lesions were compared.ResultsThe AST detected significantly increased leg volume (12,437 cm³ vs 10,748 cm³, P < .0001), skin thickness (0.531 cm vs 0.508 cm, P < .0001), and water content of fat (8.2% vs 5.0%, P < .0001) in diseased left limbs compared with the contralateral nondiseased limbs, on prestent imaging. After stent placement in the left leg, there was a significant decrease in the water content of fat in the right (4.9% vs 2.7%, P < .0001) and left (8.2% vs 3.2%, P < .0001) legs. There were no significant changes in leg volume or skin thickness in either leg after stent placement. There were no significant differences between patients with or without postthrombotic lesions in their poststent improvement across the 3 measures of disease severity.ConclusionsASTs can be used to quantify measures of disease severity and postintervention changes on CT venography for patients with lower extremity venous disease. Further investigation may clarify the clinical benefit of such technologies.     

Predictors of Disease Recurrence after Venoplasty and Stent Placement for May–Thurner Syndrome

PurposeTo identify factors independently associated with disease recurrence after venoplasty and stent placement for May–Thurner syndrome (MTS).Materials and MethodsFifty-nine consecutive patients (age, 47 y ± 15; 93% female) were identified who had undergone endovascular stent placement for MTS. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, risk factors for venous thrombosis, comorbidities, and venous inflow or outflow at first follow-up (3 wk to 6 mo after treatment). Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of symptom recurrence or repeat intervention, and multivariate analysis of variance and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were used to assess relationships between degrees of in-stent stenosis and other variables in the 73% of patients with available cross-sectional imaging. Median follow up was 20.7 months (interquartile range, 4.7–49.5 mo).ResultsAll procedures were technically successful. Disease recurrence, defined as symptom recurrence following initial postprocedural resolution, was observed in 38% of patients. No preprocedural variable was found to be independently predictive of disease recurrence; however, poor venous inflow or outflow were both strongly associated with recurrent disease, with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 38.02 (3.76–384.20; P = .002) and 7.00 (1.15–42.71; P = .04), respectively. Higher degrees of in-stent stenosis were also associated with symptom recurrence, with an area under the curve of 0.93 (P = .000002) and 39%–41% stenosis being 78%–83% sensitive and 88%–92% specific for symptom recurrence.ConclusionsThese results suggest that cross-sectional imaging can help differentiate patients in whom closer follow-up may be warranted after venoplasty and stent placement for MTS and also guide counseling regarding prognosis.     

Factors Influencing in-Stent Occlusion after Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Placement with Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation

PurposeTo investigate the rate and predictors of in-stent occlusion by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following femoropopliteal artery stent placement.Materials and MethodsFrom July 2012 to June 2016, this study retrospectively investigated 191 cases of de novo femoropopliteal artery lesions (lesion length, 170 ± 97 mm; chronic total occlusion, 51%) evaluated by IVUS in 162 patients with peripheral artery disease (with critical limb ischemia of 27%) who underwent endovascular therapy using self-expanding nitinol stents. Examination by IVUS was performed to record data for vessel characteristics immediately after wire crossing and at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome measurement was the occurrence of in-stent occlusion, defined as the absence of blood flow at the treatment site by duplex ultrasonography. Predictors for in-stent occlusion were also evaluated by multivariate analysis.ResultsIn-stent occlusion was observed in 15% (n = 28) of lesions, and the mean follow-up time was 19 ± 13 months. After multivariate analysis, it was found that plaque burden ≥60% after stent placement (P < .001), female gender (P = .002), and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification C and D lesions (P = .047) were significantly associated with the occurrence of in-stent occlusion.ConclusionsPlaque burden ≥60% after stent placement, female gender, and TASC II classification C/D lesions were significantly associated with the occurrence of in-stent occlusion after femoropopliteal artery stent placement as evaluated by IVUS.     

Percutaneous Thrombectomy with the JETi8 Peripheral Thrombectomy System for the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis

PurposeThis study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the JETi8 peripheral thrombectomy system in treating acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Materials and MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 18 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years old [range, 15-74 years old]; 5 men and 13 women). There were 21 instances of DVTs (9 iliofemoral, 10 axillosubclavian, and 2 portal), which were treated using the JETi8 thrombectomy device between November 2016 and July 2018. Thrombus was laced with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) (9.3 mg, on average; range, 2–12 mg) in 17 procedures (81%) prior to thrombectomy. Technical success was defined as restoration of antegrade flow using the JETi8 with or without additional treatment of an underlying obstructive lesion. Procedural success was defined as technical success with or without the addition of overnight catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT)ResultsMean procedure time was 83 minutes (range, 30–160 minutes), and mean thrombus reduction with the JETi8 alone was 92% (range, 60%–100%). Stent placement was required in 6 procedures (29%). Technical success using the JETi8 system alone was 76% (16 of 21 procedures), whereas 5 procedures (24%) required subsequent overnight CDT in the intensive care unit. Procedural success rate was 100% (20 of 20 procedures). Mean aspirated volume was 531 mL (range, 250–1,230 mL). The only adverse event was a subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Seven patients (33%) were discharged the same day. Recurrent thrombosis was observed in 5 patients (24%), of whom 3 were successfully treated with the JETi8 system.ConclusionsThe JETi8 system may be a safe and effective option for thrombectomy of acute DVT.     

Single-Session Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Iliocaval and Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Technical Results of a Prospective Pilot Study

PurposeTo investigate the short-term results of single-session treatment of iliocaval and iliofemoral DVT using a single thrombectomy device.Materials and MethodsThis prospective pilot study analyzed patients with acute iliocaval or iliofemoral DVT treated in a single session using the JETi thrombectomy system. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The cohort consisted of 53 limbs in 47 patients (27 women), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 16–88 years). The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) and reestablishment of unobstructed flow in a single session, respectively.ResultsThe mean duration of symptoms was 8.5 days ± SD 9.2, with 10 patients (11 limbs, 21.3%) presenting with a symptom duration of >14 days. Twelve (25.5%) patients had thrombosis of the inferior vena cava and the iliofemoral segments. During the index procedure, unobstructed flow was reestablished in 47 of 53 (88.6%) limbs in 41 of 47 (87.2%) patients (primary endpoint) with no MAEs through 30 days. Overall, unobstructed flow was restored in 50 of 53 (94.3%) limbs and in 44 of 47 (93.6%) patients.ConclusionsSuccessful single-session treatment of patients with acute iliocaval and iliofemoral DVT is feasible with a high rate of efficacy and a low rate of adverse events. Such patients may be treated on an outpatient basis.     

Utilization of and Outcomes Associated with Intravascular Ultrasound during Deep Venous Stent Placement among Medicare Beneficiaries

PurposeTo evaluate temporal trends, practice variation, and associated outcomes with the use of intravascular ultrasound (US) during deep venous stent placement among Medicare beneficiaries.Materials and MethodsAll lower extremity deep venous stent placement procedures performed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019 among Medicare beneficiaries were included. Temporal trends in intravascular US use were stratified by procedural setting and physician specialty. The primary outcome was a composite of 12-month all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, or repeat target vessel intervention. The secondary outcome was a composite of 12-month stent thrombosis, embolization, or restenosis.ResultsAmong the 20,984 deep venous interventions performed during the study period, 15,184 (72.4%) utilized intravascular US. Moderate growth in intravascular US use was observed during the study period in all clinical settings. There was a variation in the use of intravascular US among all operators (median, 77.3% of cases; interquartile range, 20.0%–99.2%). In weighted analyses, intravascular US use during deep venous stent placement was associated with a lower risk of both the primary (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.76; P < .001) and secondary (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.27–0.39; P < .001) composite end points.ConclusionsIntravascular US is frequently used during deep venous stent placement among Medicare beneficiaries, with further increase in use from 2017 to 2019. The utilization of intravascular US as part of a procedural strategy was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of adverse outcomes after the procedure, including venous stent thrombosis and embolization.     

Lower Extremity Venous Stent Placement: A Large Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

PurposeTo study short-term and long-term outcomes of lower extremity venous stents placed at a single center and to characterize changes in vein diameter achieved by stent placement.Materials and MethodsA database of all patients who received lower extremity venous stents between 1996 and 2018 revealed 1,094 stents were placed in 406 patients (172 men, 234 women; median age, 49 y) in 513 limbs, including patients with iliocaval stents (9.4% acute thrombosis, 65.3% chronic thrombosis, 25.3% nonthrombotic lesions). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were assessed for lower extremity venous stents at 1, 3, and 5 years using Kaplan-Meier analyses and summary statistics. Subset analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify risk factors for patency loss. Vein diameters and Villalta scores before and up to 12 months after stent placement were compared. Complication and mortality rates were calculated.ResultsPrimary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates at 5 years were 57.3%, 77.2%, and 80.9% by Kaplan-Meier methods and 78.6%, 90.3%, and 92.8% by summary statistics. Median follow-up was 199 days (interquartile range, 35.2–712.0 d). Patency rates for the subset of patients (n = 46) with ≥ 5 years of follow-up (mean ± SD 9.1 y ± 3.4) were nearly identical to cohort patency rates at 5 years. Patients with inferior vena cava stent placement (hazard ratio 2.11, P < .0001) or acute thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.65, P < .0001) during the index procedure had significantly increased risk of losing primary patency status. Vein diameters were significantly greater after stent placement. There were no instances of stent fracture, migration, or structural deformities. In patients with chronic deep vein thrombosis, Villalta scores significantly decreased after stent placement (from 15.7 to 7.4, P < .0001). Perioperative mortality was < 1%, and major perioperative complication rate was 3.7%.ConclusionsCavo-ilio-femoral stent placement for venous occlusive disease achieves improvement of vein disease severity scores, increase in treated vein diameters, and satisfactory long-term patency rates.     

Portal Vein Recanalization for Noncirrhotic Portal Vein Cavernous Transformation: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation versus Portal Vein Stent Placement

PurposeTo compare the clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation versus portal vein stent placement (PVS) in patients with noncirrhotic cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV).Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, clinical data from patients with noncirrhotic CTPV who underwent TIPS creation or PVS were compared. A total of 54 patients (mean age, 43.8 years ± 15.8; 31 men and 23 women) were included from January 2013 to January 2021; 29 patients underwent TIPS creation, and 25 patients underwent PVS. Stent occlusion, variceal rebleeding, survival, and postprocedural complications were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 40.2 months ± 26.2 in the TIPS group and 35.3 months ± 21.1 in the PVS group. The stent occlusion rate in the PVS group (16%, 4 of 25) was significantly lower than that in the TIPS group (41.4%, 12 of 29) during the follow-up (P = .042). The cumulative variceal rebleeding rates in the TIPS group were significantly higher than those in the PVS group (28% vs 4%; P = .027). The procedural success rate was 69% in the TIPS group and 86% in the PVS group (P = .156). There was a higher number of severe adverse events after TIPS than after PVS (0% vs 24%; P = .012).ConclusionsPortal vein recanalization with PVS may be a preferable alternative to TIPS creation in the treatment of noncirrhotic CTPV because of higher stent patency rates, lower risk of variceal rebleeding, and fewer adverse events.     

CT Angiographic Evaluation of Congenital Anastomoses between Femoropopliteal Vein and Deep Femoral Vein: Types and Incidence

PurposeTo evaluate congenital anastomotic channels between femoropopliteal veins and deep femoral veins with the use of computed tomographic (CT) venography.Materials and MethodsCT venography of 488 limbs in 244 patients (105 men; mean age, 61 y; age range, 18–96 y) performed between January 2016 and December 2016 was retrospectively evaluated. The presence or absence of anastomotic channels (> 3 mm in diameter) connecting a femoropopliteal vein to a deep femoral vein was determined, and the observed channels were classified based on their location and course.ResultsTwo types of anastomotic channels were observed in 32 patients (13%): a persistent sciatic vein (PSV) in 24 limbs of 15 patients (6%) and a retrofemoral channel (RFC) in 22 limbs of 19 patients (8%). A PSV anastomosed with the popliteal vein in the popliteal fossa, coursed posterior to the adductor magnus muscle, and drained into the deep femoral vein. An RFC anastomosed with the femoral vein at the level of the adductor hiatus, coursed posterior to the femoral shaft, and drained into the deep femoral vein. PSVs and RFCs were of similar size or larger than adjacent femoropopliteal veins in 50% (12 of 24) and 22% of limbs (4 of 22), respectively.ConclusionsAnastomotic channels connecting a femoropopliteal vein to a deep femoral vein are not a rare variation and may have an important role in collateral venous drainage of the lower extremities.     

Six-Month Deep Vein Thrombosis Outcomes by Chronicity: Analysis of the Real-World ClotTriever Outcomes Registry

PurposeTo analyze the first 250 patients from the prospective, multicenter, industry-sponsored ClotTriever Outcomes (CLOUT) registry, assessing the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for acute, subacute, and chronic deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Materials and MethodsReal-world patients with lower extremity DVT were treated with the ClotTriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, California). Adjuvant venoplasty, stent placement, or both were performed at the physician’s discretion. Thrombus chronicity was determined by visual inspection of removed thrombus, categorizing patients into acute, subacute, and chronic subgroups. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed through 30 days. Clinical and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes are reported through 6 months.ResultsThrombus chronicity was designated for 244 of the 250 patients (acute, 32.8%; subacute, 34.8%; chronic, 32.4%) encompassing 254 treated limbs. Complete or near-complete (≥75%) thrombus removal was achieved in 90.8%, 81.9%, and 83.8% of the limbs with acute, subacute, and chronic thrombus, respectively. No fibrinolytics were administered, and 243 (99.6%) procedures were single sessions. One (0.4%) patient in the subacute group experienced a device-related SAE, a fatal pulmonary embolism. On comparing baseline and 6-month data, improvements were demonstrated in median Villalta scores (acute, from 10 to 1; subacute, from 9 to 1; chronic, from 10 to 3; for all, P < .0001) and mean EuroQol group 5-dimension (EQ-5D) self-report questionnaire scores (acute, 0.58 to 0.89; subacute, 0.65 to 0.87; chronic, 0.58 to 0.88; for all, P < .0001). There were no significant differences in outcomes across the subgroups.ConclusionsMechanical thrombectomy using the ClotTriever System with adjunctive venoplasty and stent placement is safe and similarly effective for acute, subacute, and chronic DVT.     

Stent Graft Placement for the Treatment of Hepatic Artery Injury in Patients with Cancer: Primary Patency and Clinical Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, primary patency, and clinical outcomes of hepatic artery stent graft (SG) placement for vascular injuries.Materials and MethodsPatients treated with hepatic arterial SG placement for vascular injuries between September 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, indication, stent graft characteristics, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, clinical success rate, complications, and type of follow-up imaging were collected. Follow-up images were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers to assess primary patency. A time-to-event analysis was performed. The median duration of stent graft patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to stent graft patency.ResultsThirty-five patients were treated with hepatic arterial SG placement, 11 for postoperative bleeds and 24 for hepatic artery infusion pump catheter–related complications. Clinical success was achieved in 32 (91%) patients (95% CI, 77–98). The median primary patency was 87 days (95% CI, 73–293). Stent grafts of ≥6-mm diameter retained patency for a longer duration than that with stent grafts of smaller diameters (6 mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.88; P = .026; and 7+ mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.83; P = .023). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen was not associated with increased stent graft patency duration (P > .05). Only minor complications were reported in 2 (5.7%) patients.ConclusionsStent grafts can be used safely and effectively to treat injuries of the hepatic artery. Stent graft diameters of ≥6 mm seem to provide more durable patency.     

Mitigation of Sarcopenia after Peritoneovenous Shunt Placement in Patients with Refractory Ascites

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of peritoneonvenous shunt placement on metrics of sarcopenia in patients with refractory ascites.Materials and MethodsAn institutional review board–approved single-institution retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent peritoneovenous shunt (Denver Shunt; BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) placement (N = 29) and a comparator cohort of patients with cirrhosis who underwent serial paracentesis (N = 42) from 2009 to 2019 with baseline and follow-up cross-sectional imaging of at least 3 months was performed. Axial muscle area measurements (psoas, paraspinal, and total abdominal wall) were performed using free-hand region-of-interest technique. Patient records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, referring indication, laboratory studies, and performance status. Statistical analyses were performed with Student t test, Welch unequal variances, Fisher exact test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsThe most common indications for peritoneovenous shunt placement were metastatic disease or cirrhosis. In the shunt cohort, there were no significant differences in the aggregate psoas muscle area (13.4 vs 14.0 cm²; P = .223) or paraspinal muscle area (43.0 vs 42.2 cm²; P = .471). In the paracentesis cohort, there were significant decreases in aggregate psoas (18.1 vs 15.7 cm²; P < .0001) and erector spinae (43.4 vs 39.9 cm²; P < .0001) muscle area. In addition, there was a significant decrease in serum albumin level (3.2 vs 3.0 g/dL; P = .015) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (1.0 vs 1.3; P < .0001) in the paracentesis group, compared with no significant changes in the shunt cohort.ConclusionsIn patients with refractory ascites who are not candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, peritoneovenous shunt mitigates loss of truncal muscle and, in some instances, promotes muscle growth.     

Comparison of Anticoagulation Regimens Following Stent Placement for Nonthrombotic Lower Extremity Venous Disease

PurposeTo determine whether subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens are noninferior to therapeutic anticoagulation regimens following stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease.Materials and MethodsFifty-one consecutive patients (88% women; mean age, 44 years) who underwent stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who received prophylactic enoxaparin or no anticoagulation (subtherapeutic) after the procedure and those who received therapeutic doses of anticoagulation with enoxaparin, warfarin, and/or rivaroxaban (therapeutic) after the procedure. Baseline demographic characteristics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using the Student t test, Fisher exact test, and χ² test. The subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation groups did not differ significantly in the baseline demographic characteristics (eg, sex, race, and age) or procedure characteristics (eg, number of stents placed, stent brand, stent diameter, etc).ResultsThe mean clinical follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 0–16.3 years). There were no thrombotic adverse events or luminal obstructions due to in-stent restenosis in either group. There were 5 minor bleeding adverse effects in the therapeutic group and no bleeding adverse effects in the subtherapeutic group (P = .051). There were no statistically significant differences in subjective symptom improvement (P = .75).ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, the subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation regimens produced equivalent outcomes in terms of adverse event rates, reintervention rates, and symptomatic improvement, suggesting that therapeutic doses of anticoagulation do not improve outcomes compared with subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens following nonthrombotic venous stent placement.     

Outcomes of Venoplasty-Assisted,Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Patients with Upper-Arm Venous Stenosis: Comparison with Midlines and Contralateral Placement

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and peripherally inserted central catheter (PTA + PICC), contralateral PICC, and midline catheterization (MC) in patients with venous stenosis.Materials and MethodsA total of 7,327 PICC procedures were performed in 5,421 patients at a single institution between 2013 and 2019. Among them, 87 patients had upper-arm venous stenoses and were managed with PTA + PICC, contralateral PICC, or MC. Data on catheter-dwell time, clinical success rate, and adverse events were recorded. The procedure was considered to have clinically succeeded when a PICC was removed from the patient just before discharge or after the completion of therapy. Catheter survival time and the chance of adverse events were compared among the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsPTA + PICC, contralateral PICC, and MC procedures were performed for 57 (65.5%, 57/87), 10 (11.5%, 10/87), and 20 (23.0%, 23/87) patients, respectively. The mean catheter-dwell time in the PTA + PICC, contralateral PICC, and MC groups was 49.7, 28.7, and 15.1 days, respectively, and the clinical success rate of each group was 86.0% (49/57), 80.0% (8/10), and 50.0% (10/20). The PTA + PICC group had a significantly longer catheter survival time than the MC group (P < .001). The chance of a catheter-related infection (P = .008) was significantly lower in the PTA + PICC group than in the MC group.ConclusionsPTA + PICC or contralateral PICC should be considered prior to ipsilateral MC when venous stenosis is encountered during PICC procedures.     

Dural Venous Sinus Stent Placement Reduces Dosage Requirements for Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

This retrospective single-center study evaluated the change in required dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate before and after dural venous sinus stent placement (VSSP) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Adults diagnosed with IIH who failed optimized medical management and were treated with VSSP were included. This study comprised 55 patients who underwent VSSP for the diagnosis of IIH. The median preprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 1,000 mg (range, 500–4,000 mg) and 100 mg (range, 0–200 mg), respectively, among patients able to tolerate the medications. The median postprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 375 mg (range, 0–4,000 mg), with a mean reduction of 52.9% (P = .001), and 0 mg (range, 0–200 mg), with a mean reduction of 45.9% (P = .005), respectively. Dural VSSP significantly reduced dosage requirements for acetazolamide and/or topiramate, potentially reducing the morbidity secondary to medication side effects.