Predictors of Occlusion of Hepatic Blood Vessels after Irreversible Electroporation of Liver Tumors

PurposeTo examine predictors of midterm occlusion in portal and hepatic veins within or adjacent to the ablation zone after irreversible electroporation (IRE) of liver tumors.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis included 39 patients who underwent CT-guided IRE of liver tumors. Vessels within or adjacent to the ablation zone were identified on CT images acquired immediately after the procedure, and the positional relationships with the ablation zone (within/adjacent), locations (proximal/distal), and diameters (< 4 mm or ≥ 4 mm) were evaluated. Using contrast-enhanced follow-up scans, each vessel was classified as patent, stenosed, or occluded. Associations between vessel occlusion and each variable were investigated.ResultsOverall, 33 portal veins and 64 hepatic veins were analyzed. Follow-up scans showed occlusion in 12/33 (36.7%) portal veins and 17/64 (26.6%) hepatic veins. Vessels within the ablation zone were occluded significantly more frequently than vessels adjacent to the ablation zone (portal: 55.6% [10/18] vs 13.3% [2/15], P = .04; hepatic: 45.4% [15/33] vs 6.4% [2/31], P = .011). Vessels with a diameter < 4 mm were also occluded significantly more frequently than vessels with a diameter ≥ 4 mm (portal: 72.7% [8/11] vs 18.1% [4/22], P = .011; hepatic: 54.8% [17/31] vs 0% [0/33], P < .001). The respective positive and negative predictive values for occlusion of vessels categorized as both within and < 4 mm were 88% (7/8) and 82% (20/25) for portal veins and 79% (15/19) and 96% (43/45) for hepatic veins.ConclusionsMidterm vessel occlusion after liver IRE could be predicted with relatively high accuracy by assessing ablation location and vessel diameter.     

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging Evaluation of Perfusional Changes and Ablation Zone Size after Combination Embolization and Ablation Therapy

PurposeThe objectives of this study were to assess the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in quantifying parenchymal perfusional changes after embolization and to characterize the association between pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and final microwave ablation volume.Materials and MethodsPK parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging were used to quantify perfusional changes in the liver after transarterial embolization of the right or left lobe in a swine liver model (n = 5). Each animal subject subsequently underwent microwave ablation (60 W for 5 minutes) of the embolized and nonembolized liver lobes. Changes in PK parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging were correlated with their respective final microwave ablation volumes in each liver lobe.ResultsMicrowave ablation volumes of embolized liver lobes were significantly larger than those of nonembolized liver lobes (28.0 mL ± 6.2 vs 15.1 mL ± 5.2, P < .001). PK perfusion parameters were significantly lower in embolized liver lobes than in nonembolized liver lobes (K^trans = 0.69 min^?1 ± 0.15 vs 1.52 min^?1 ± 0.37, P < .001; k_ep = 0.69 min^?1 ± 0.19 vs 1.54 min^?1 ± 0.42, P < .001). There was a moderate but significant correlation between normalized k_ep and ablation volume, with each unit increase in normalized k_ep corresponding to a 9.8-mL decrease in ablation volume (P = .035).ConclusionsPK-derived parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging can be used to quantify perfusional changes after transarterial embolization and are directly inversely correlated with final ablation volume.     

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: National Treatment Trends and Outcomes Compared to Partial Nephrectomy and Thermal Ablation

PurposeTo assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN).Materials and MethodsThe 2004–2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score–matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80–2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95–2.55, P = .079).ConclusionsCurrent SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes.     

Predictors of Progression-Free Survival and Local Tumor Control after Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Retrospective Study

PurposeTo describe ablation of bone, liver, lung, and soft tissue tumors from oligometastatic breast cancer and to define predictors of local progression and progression-free survival (PFS).Materials and MethodsA total of 33 women (mean age 52 ± 12 years old; range, 28–69 years), underwent 46 thermal ablations of liver (n = 35), lung (n = 7), and bone/soft tissue (n = 4) metastases. Mean tumor diameter was 18 ± 15 mm (range, 6–50 mm). Ablations were performed to eradicate all evident sites of disease (n = 24) or to control growing sites in the setting of other stable or responding sites of disease (n = 22). Patient characteristics, ablation margins, imaging responses, and cases of PFS were assessed. Follow-up imaging was performed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or positron-emission tomography/ CT.ResultsMedian PFS was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 –14.5 months), and time to local progression was 11 months (95% CI, 5–16 months). Eight patients (24%) maintained no evidence of disease during a median follow-up period of 39 months. Ablation margin ≥5 mm was associated with no local tumor progression. Longer PFS was noted in estrogen receptor-positive patients (12 vs 4 months; P = .037) and younger patients (12 vs 4 months; P = .039) treated to eradicate all sites of disease (13 vs 5 months; P = .05). Eighteen patients (55%) developed new metastases during study follow-up.ConclusionsThermal ablation of oligometastatic pulmonary, hepatic, bone, and soft tissue tumors can eliminate local tumor progression if margins are ≥5 mm. Longer PFS was observed in patients who were estrogen receptor-positive and patients who were younger and in whom all sites of disease were eradicated.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

Hypertensive Crisis during Microwave Ablation of Adrenal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors

PurposeTo identify risk factors for hypertensive crisis (HC) during ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation of adrenal neoplasms.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent MW ablation for adrenal tumors between April 2006 and November 2017 were retrospectively identified for this study (51 consecutive patients; 35 males, 16 females; mean age, 55 years; range, 15–85 years). A total of 77 MW ablation treatments were performed for 67 tumors (24 primary [9 pheochromocytomas, 8 adenomas, and 7 cortical carcinomas]; and 43 metastases [22 hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 renal cell carcinoma, 5 non-small cell lung cancer, 4 colorectal cancer, 3 liposarcoma, and 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma]). The mean diameter of the adrenal tumors was 4.6 cm (range, 1.2–16.2 cm). Information about patient demographics, imaging studies, pathology and laboratory results, procedure records, and clinical outcomes was retrieved and analyzed. Statistical analysis was then performed to determine potential risk factors for HC.ResultsOf the 77 MW ablation procedures, HC occurred in 13 (16.9%). A significantly higher risk of HC was observed in patients with pheochromocytoma (odds ratio [OR], 9.037; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.731–47.172; P = .009), body mass index <24 kg/m² (OR, 5.167; 95% CI, 1.060–25.194; P = .042), dominant tumor size ≤4.5 cm (OR, 4.023; 95% CI, 1.011–16.005; P = .048), and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg (OR, 0.242; 95% CI, 0.068–0.861; P = .029).ConclusionHC can occur during MW ablation in patients with either primary or metastatic adrenal tumors. Pheochromocytoma, body mass index, tumor size, and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure appear to be significant risk factors for the occurrence of HC.     

Transcatheter CT Hepatic Arteriography Compared with Conventional CT Fluoroscopy Guidance in Percutaneous Thermal Ablation to Treat Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Single-Center Comparative Analysis of 2 Historical Cohorts

PurposeTo evaluate safety and efficacy of CT hepatic arteriography compared with conventional CT fluoroscopy guidance in percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (MW) ablation to treat colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).Materials and MethodsThis single-center comparative, retrospective study analyzed data of 108 patients treated with 156 percutaneous ablation procedures (42 CT fluoroscopy guidance [25 RF ablation, 17 MW ablation]; 114 CT hepatic arteriography guidance [18 RF ablation, 96 MW ablation]) for 260 CRLM between January 2009 and May 2019. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. LTPFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThere were no complications related to the transarterial catheter procedure. CT hepatic arteriography proved superior to CT fluoroscopy regarding 2-year LTPFS (18/202 [8.9%] vs 19/58 [32.8%]; P < .001, respectively). CT hepatic arteriography versus CT fluoroscopy (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.15–0.54; P < .001) and MW ablation versus RF ablation (hazard ratio = 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.24–1.12; P = .094) were positive predictors for longer LTPFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that CT hepatic arteriography versus CT fluoroscopy (hazard ratio = 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.90; P = .025) was associated with a significantly superior LTPFS. OS was similar between the 2 cohorts (P = .3).ConclusionsWhile adding procedure time and marginal patient burden, transcatheter CT hepatic arteriography–guided ablation was associated with increased local disease control and superior LTPFS compared with conventional CT fluoroscopy. CT hepatic arteriography represents a safe and valid alternative to CT fluoroscopy, as it reduces the number of repeat ablations required without adding risk or detrimental effect on survival.     

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block for Adjunctive Analgesia during Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeTo determine whether hepatic hilar nerve block techniques reduce analgesic and sedation requirements during percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed of 177 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 33–86 years) who underwent percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors. All patients were treated utilizing local anesthetic and moderate sedation between November 2018 and November 2021 at a tertiary level hospital, with or without the administration of a hepatic hilar nerve block. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the administration of the hilar nerve block and fentanyl and midazolam dosages.ResultsA total of 114 (64%) patients received a hilar nerve block in addition to procedural sedation, and 63 (36%) patients received procedural sedation alone. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic and tumor characteristics between the cohorts. The procedure duration was longer in the hilar block cohort than in the unblocked cohort (median, 95 vs 82 minutes; P = .0012). The technical success rate (98% in both the cohorts, P = .93) and adverse event rate (11% vs 3%, P = .14) were not significantly different between the cohorts. After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, ablation modality, and procedure and ablation durations, hilar nerve blocks were associated with lower fentanyl (?18.4%, P = .0045) and midazolam (?22.7%, P = .0007) dosages.ConclusionsHepatic hilar nerve blocks significantly decrease the fentanyl and midazolam requirements during thermal ablation of hepatic tumors, without a significant change in the technical success or adverse event rates.     

MR Imaging Biomarkers for the Prediction of Outcome after Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and Radiomic Features

PurposeTo assess the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and radiomic features in pretreatment magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation.Material and MethodsSixty-five therapy-naïve patients with 85 nodular HCC tumors <5 cm in size were included in this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant, institutional review board–approved, retrospective study. All patients underwent RF ablation as first-line treatment and demonstrated complete response on the first follow-up imaging. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging biomarkers were analyzed for LI-RADS features by 2 board-certified radiologists or by analysis of nodular and perinodular radiomic features from 3-dimensional segmentations. A radiomic signature was calculated with the most informative features of a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model using leave-one-out cross-validation. The association between both LI-RADS features and radiomic signatures with PFS was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier analysis and a weighted log-rank test.ResultsThe median PFS was 19 months (95% confidence interval, 16.1–19.4) for a follow-up period of 24 months. Multifocality (P = .033); the appearance of capsular continuity, compared with an absent or discontinuous capsule (P = .012); and a higher radiomic signature based on nodular and perinodular features (P = .030) were associated with poorer PFS in early-stage HCC. The observation size, presence of arterial hyperenhancement, nonperipheral washout, and appearance of an enhancing “capsule” were not associated with PFS (P > .05).ConclusionsAlthough multifocal HCC clearly indicates a more aggressive phenotype even in early-stage disease, the continuity of an enhancing capsule and a higher radiomic signature may add value as MR imaging biomarkers for poor PFS in HCC treated with RF ablation.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of the Time Interval between the Two Treatments on Outcome

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within or beyond 30 days for medium-large or multiple recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from 2007 through 2015, 135 patients with a single recurrent HCC (>3 cm) or multiple (2–5 tumors) recurrent HCCs underwent transarterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation. A total of 62 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within 30 days (sequential group) and 73 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization beyond 30 days (delayed group). Outcomes of interests included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complete response (CR) rate.ResultsThe median OS and PFS were 49.8 and 38.0 months for sequential group, and 31.0 and 11.6 months for the delayed group. The sequential group experienced significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.517; P = .002) and PFS (HR, 0.621; P = .021). Among patients with multiple tumors or a single tumor >5 cm, the sequential group still had significantly longer OS (P = .022; P = .018, respectively) and PFS (P = 0.042; P = .036, respectively) than the delayed group, although no significant differences were observed among patients with solitary 3- to 5-cm tumors (P = .138; P = .803, respectively). The sequential group had a significantly better CR rate than the delayed group (85.4% vs. 68.5%, respectively; P = .035). Significant predictors of OS and PFS included maximum tumor size, number of tumors, and time interval between transarterial chemoembolization and RF ablation.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization plus sequential RF ablation within 30 days was more effective for recurrent HCCs than transarterial chemoembolization plus delayed RF ablation. The time interval within 30 days is required for treating large or multiple HCCs but may not be necessary for solitary medium-sized HCC.     

Pleural Effusion after Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation with Artificial Ascites: Clinical Spectrum and Significance

PurposeTo retrospectively investigate incidence, clinical outcome, and risk factors of iatrogenic pleural effusion in patients with hepatic tumors undergoing radiofrequency (RF) ablation using artificial ascites (AA).Materials and MethodsPatients (N = 163) who underwent RF ablation using AA were classified into pleural effusion and non–pleural effusion groups according to the presence of pleural effusion on immediate follow-up CT and chest radiograph after RF ablation. The pleural effusion group included asymptomatic and symptomatic subgroups. The incidence and subsequent clinical outcomes of patients developing pleural effusion after RF ablation were evaluated.ResultsOverall, 96 patients (58.9%) developed pleural effusion, which resolved in 4.4 d ± 3.1. Hospital length of stay in the pleural effusion group was longer than the non-pleural effusion group (6.5 d ± 2.6 vs 5.7 d ± 2.8, P < .01). The pleural effusion group had longer AA infusion time (P = .01), larger infused AA volume (P < .01), and longer ablation time (P < .01) than the non-pleural effusion group. Eighteen patients (18.8%) developed symptomatic pleural effusion and had a larger infused AA volume than asymptomatic patients with pleural effusion (P < .01). Pleural effusion duration and hospital length stay were also longer in the symptomatic pleural effusion subgroup than in the asymptomatic subgroup (P < .01). Infused AA volume was the only independent prognostic factor of pleural effusion duration in multivariate analysis (P = .038).ConclusionsPleural effusion frequently occurs after RF ablation using AA. Although generally considered negligible, pleural effusion could be a clinical problem and prolong hospitalization. Therefore, operators should be careful not to infuse too much AA when performing RF ablation.     

Juxtametallic Bipolar Bone Radiofrequency Ablation: Thermal Monitoring in an Ex-Vivo Model with Specimen MRI and Histopathologic Correlation

PurposeTo measure the ablation zone temperature and nontarget tissue temperature during radiofrequency (RF) ablation in bone containing metal instrumentation versus no metal instrumentation (control group).Materials and MethodsEx vivo experiments were performed on 15 swine vertebrae (control, n = 5; titanium screw, n = 5; stainless steel screw, n = 5). Screws and RF ablation probe were inserted identically under fluoroscopy. During RF ablation (3 W, 5 minutes), temperature was measured 10 mm from RF ablation centerpoint and in muscle contacting the screw. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, gross pathologic, and histopathologic analyses were performed on 1 specimen from each group.ResultsAblation zone temperatures at 2.5 and 5 minutes increased by 12.2 °C ± 2.6 °C and 21.5 °C ± 2.1 °C (control); 11.0 °C ± 4.1 °C and 20.0 °C ± 2.9 °C (juxta-titanium screw), and 10.0 °C ± 3.4 °C and 17.2 °C ± 3.5 °C (juxta–stainless steel) screw; differences among groups did not reach significance by analysis of variance (P = .87). Mixed-effects linear regression revealed a statistically significant increase in temperature over time in all 3 groups (4.2 °C/min ± 0.4 °C/min, P < .001). Compared with the control, there was no significant difference in the temperature change over time for titanium (?0.3 °C/min ± 0.5 °C/min, P = .53) or steel groups (?0.4 °C/min ± 0.5 °C/min, P = .38). The mean screw temperature at the final time point did not show a statistically significant change compared with baseline in either the titanium group (?1.2 °C ± 2.3 °C, P = .50) or steel group (2.6 °C ± 2.9 °C, P = .11). MR imaging and pathologic analyses revealed homogeneous ablation without sparing of the peri-hardware zones.ConclusionsAdjacent metallic instrumentation did not affect the rate of or absolute increase in temperature in the ablation zone, did not create peri–metallic ablation inhomogeneities, and did not result in significant nontarget heating of muscle tissue in contact with the metal instrumentation.     

Preliminary Study of Microwave Ablation for Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Nonoperative Candidates

PurposeTo study the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent MWA for multifocal PTMC (number of nodules ≤3). A total of 44 patients were included, and the mean age was 43 years (SD ± 11). After ablation, progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months; disease progression; change in tumor size and volume; tumor disappearance rate; and adverse events (AEs) were assessed, and the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of MWA for PTMC were evaluated on the basis of statistical analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up period was 18 months (interquartile range, 12–33 months). The PFS rates at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 100.0%, 96.4%, 96.4%, 70.3%, and 52.7%, respectively. The disease progression rate was 11.4% (5 of 44 patients). The maximum diameter (MD) and volume of the ablation zone were larger at the 3-month follow-up than before ablation (median MD, 13.0 vs 7.0 mm; P < .001; median volume, 503.8 vs 113.0 mm³; P < .001). Subsequently, the tumors exhibited a reduction in both size and volume after 18 months (median MD, 4.0 vs 7.0 mm; P = .04; median volume, 12.6 vs 113.0 mm³; P = .055). At the end of the follow-up period, the complete response rate was 59% (26 of 44 patients). The overall AE rate was 6.8%.ConclusionsMWA is a feasible treatment for PTMC (number of nodules ≤3), and this study preliminarily demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of this technique.     

Adjuvant Thermal Accelerant Gel Use Increases Microwave Ablation Zone Temperature in Porcine Liver as Measured by MR Thermometry

PurposeTo determine the effects of a thermal accelerant gel on temperature parameters during microwave liver ablation.Materials and MethodsSixteen consecutive liver ablations were performed in 5 domestic swine under general anesthesia with (n = 8) and without (n = 8) administration of thermal accelerant gel. Ablation zone temperature was assessed by real-time MR thermometry, measured as maximum temperature (T_max) and the volume of tissue ≥ 60°C (V₆₀). Tissue heating rate, ablation zone shape, and thermal energy deposition using the temperature degree-minutes at 43°C (TDM43) index were also measured. Differences between groups were analyzed using generalized mixed modeling with significance set at P = .05.ResultsMean peak ablation zone temperature was significantly greater with thermal accelerant use (mean T_max, thermal accelerant: 120.0°C, 95% confidence interval [CI] 113.0°C–126.9°C; mean T_max, control: 80.3°C, 95% CI 72.7°C–88.0°C; P < .001), and a significantly larger volume of liver tissue achieved or exceeded 60°C when thermal accelerant was administered (mean V₆₀, thermal accelerant: 22.2 cm³; mean V₆₀, control: 15.9 cm³; P < .001). Significantly greater thermal energy deposition was observed during ablations performed with accelerant (mean TDM43, thermal accelerant: 198.4 min, 95% CI 170.7–230.6 min; mean TDM43, control: 82.8 min, 95% CI 80.5–85.1 min; P < .0001). The rate of tissue heating was significantly greater with thermal accelerant use (thermal accelerant: 5.8 min ± 0.4; control: 10.0 min; P < .001), and accelerant gel ablations demonstrated a more spherical temperature distribution (P = .002).ConclusionsThermal accelerant use is associated with higher microwave ablation zone temperatures, greater thermal energy deposition, and faster and more spherical tissue heating compared with control ablations.     

Image-Guided Ablation of Recurrent or Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo assess the safety and effectiveness of image-guided ablation of recurrent or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, 25 patients (14 women; age, 36–84 years) underwent 37 image-guided liver tumor ablation procedures to treat 47 ICCs (May 2004 to January 2022). At initial diagnosis, 20 patients had Stage 1 or 2 disease and 5 had Stage 3 or 4 disease. Before ablation, 19 (76.0%) of the 25 patients had progressed through prior treatments, including resection (n = 11), chemotherapy (n = 11), transarterial embolization (n = 3), or radiotherapy (n = 1); 6 (24.0%) of the 25 patients were treatment naïve. Ablation modality selection was based on patient and tumor characteristics and operator preference. Primary outcomes included local progression–free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after ablation. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThe mean ablated tumor size was 2.0 cm ± 1.2 (range, 0.5–5.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 72.9–96.8), 73.0% (95% CI, 59.0–90.4), and 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6–85.1), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary LPFS rates were 89.5% (95% CI, 80.2–99.9), 81.9% (95% CI, 69.4–96.6), and 75.6% (95% CI, 60.2–94.9). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates for tumors ≤2 cm in size were all 95.8% (95% CI, 88.2–100.0). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 78.5% (95% CI, 63.5–97.2), 68.4% (95% CI, 51.3–91.1), and 43.5% (95% CI, 23.5–80.5). Larger tumor size was associated with decreased time to local progression (hazard ratio, 1.93; P = .012).ConclusionsPercutaneous ablation provided favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with recurrent or inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.     

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Locoregional Therapy Combined with Adoptive Transfer of Allogeneic γδ T Cells for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of locoregional therapy plus adoptive transfer of allogeneic gamma delta (γδ) T cells for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).MethodsThirty patients with HCC and 29 patients with ICC were randomly assigned to receive locoregional therapy (HCC, Group A, n = 15; ICC, Group C, n = 15) or locoregional therapy plus γδ T cell therapy (HCC, Group B, n = 15; ICC, Group D, n = 14). Groups A and C only received locoregional ablation (cryoablation or irreversible electroporation), whereas Groups B and D received locoregional therapy followed by adoptive transfer of allogeneic γδ T cells. The primary endpoints were safety, distant progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe median distant PFS was significantly longer in the combined treatment groups than the locoregional treatment groups (HCC: 8 vs 4 months, P = .04; ICC: 8 vs 4 months, P = .021). There was no significant difference in local PFS between the 2 treatment modalities. Patients with HCC in the combined treatment group had a longer OS (median OS: 13 vs 8 months, P = .029). However, there was no significant difference in OS in patients with ICC between the 2 treatment modalities (median OS: 9.5 vs 8 months, P = .546). All adverse events were manageable with no significant difference in incidence between groups.ConclusionsThe novel combination of locoregional ablation with adoptive transfer of allogeneic γδ cells was safe, with encouraging clinical efficacy against HCC and ICC.     

Percutaneous MR Imaging-Guided Laser Ablation and Cryoablation for the Treatment of Pediatric and Adult Symptomatic Peripheral Soft Tissue Vascular Anomalies

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided laser ablation and cryoablation for the treatment of symptomatic soft tissue vascular anomalies (VAs) of the trunk and extremities.Materials and MethodsAn institutional review board-approved retrospective review was undertaken of all pediatric and adult patients who underwent MR imaging-guided and monitored laser ablation and/or cryoablation for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral soft tissue VA. Preablation and postablation MR imaging was independently reviewed. Pain scores on the visual analog scale (0 to 10) and self-reported subjective symptomatic improvement were assessed. Change in VA size and pain scores were compared using a paired t test.ResultsThirty patients (24 females; age, 10–75 years) with 34 VAs were treated for moderate to severe pain (n = 27) or swelling/mass effect (n = 3) with 60 total ablation sessions. The baseline maximum VA diameter was 9.5 cm ± 8.6. At baseline, all VAs (100%) demonstrated variable T2-weighted signal hyperintensity and enhancement. The baseline pain score was 6.4 ± 1.6. Clinical follow-up was available for 23 patients. At a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months ± 10.1, 19 of 20 (95%) patients treated for pain and 2 of 3 (67%) patients treated for swelling/mass effect reported partial or complete symptomatic relief. There was a significant decrease in the postablation pain scores (−5.7 ± 1.0, P < .001) and maximum VA size (−2.3 cm ± 2.7, P = .004), with >50% reduction in VA T2 signal (59%) and enhancement (73%). Nine of 30 (30%) patients experienced minor complications.ConclusionsMR imaging-guided and monitored percutaneous laser ablation and cryoablation appear to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral soft tissue VAs.     

Radiofrequency Ablation of Facial Venolymphatic Malformations: Assessment of Efficacy and Safety and the Role of Injectable Electrodes

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the treatment of facial microcystic lymphatic malformations (mLMs) or mixed venolymphatic malformations (VLMs) and to introduce the “induced-paralysis” technique with the use of an injectable electrode to minimize neural complications.Materials and MethodsData from patients with symptomatic facial mLMs or mixed VLMs who underwent US-guided RF ablation in 2014–2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to localize any functional structures close to the target lesion. Treatment outcome was assessed by 4-point cosmetic grading score (CGS). Treatment outcome was compared between patients with vs without a functional structure close to the lesion and those treated with a noninjectable vs an injectable electrode. Immediate and late complications were assessed during follow-up.ResultsData from 15 patients were evaluated. Initial CGS and median volume were significantly decreased at the last follow-up in all patients (from 4 to 1 and from 7 mL to 0.7 mL, respectively; P < .05). Treatment outcome differed significantly between those with and without a functional structure on CT or MR imaging (P < .05) but showed no difference between noninjectable (n = 9) and injectable electrodes (n = 6). Two cases of transient cranial nerve palsy were seen in the noninjectable electrode group.ConclusionsUS-guided RF ablation is effective in patients with facial mLMs or mixed VLMs. The induced-paralysis technique with an injectable electrode has the potential to ensure technical safety without compromising efficacy.     

Radiofrequency Ablation Duration per Tumor Volume May Correlate with Overall Survival in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin

PurposeTo determine whether burn time per tumor volume (BPV) (min/mL), where burn time is the total time during which radiofrequency (RF) energy is being applied, is correlated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment outcomes using RF ablation and lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD).Materials and MethodsThe HEAT study was a double-blind, randomized controlled phase III trial of RF ablation only versus RF ablation + LTLD in patients with HCCs 3–7 cm in diameter. Effect of BPV on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was analyzed.ResultsBPV demonstrated statistically significant differences between study groups for OS (P = .038, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85), but not for progression-free survival (P = .389, HR = 1.059). In a separate analysis, treatment groups were independently analyzed to determine the effect of BPV within each individual group. OS improved as BPV increased for patients receiving RF ablation + LTLD (P = .017, HR = 0.836, confidence interval [0.722, 0.968]). This same association was not observed in patients receiving RF ablation only (P = .57, HR = 0.99).ConclusionsBPV may be a useful metric for RF ablation + LTLD combination therapy for solitary HCC. The analysis suggested that the burn time for the tumor needs to be adjusted depending on the tumor volume. Because this is a post hoc study, the results are only suggestive and need to be confirmed with prospective studies.     

Impact of Intrahepatic Venovenous Shunt on Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Measurement

PurposeTo quantitatively analyze the impact of intrahepatic venovenous shunt (IHVS) on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement.Materials and MethodsFrom 2015 to 2019, 222 HVPG measurements performed during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation were eligible for this study. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) software color-coded each pixel of a two-dimensional DSA series by time-intensity curve to classify IHVS. Different degrees of IHVS were found in 36.5% of patients (81/222). Mild IHVS was found in 10.8% of patients (24/222), moderate IHVS was found in 10.8% of patients (24/222), and severe IVHS was found in 14.9% of patients (33/222).ResultsMean wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) and HVPG were significantly lower in patients with IHVS compared with patients without IHVS (WHVP: 17.78 mm Hg ± 7.00 vs 24.89 mm Hg ± 8.69, P = .001; HVPG: 11.93 mm Hg ± 5.76 vs 18.6 mm Hg ± 6.85, P < .001). Mild IHVS had little effect on WHVP and HVPG. Mean WHVP and HVPG were 11 mm Hg lower in patients with moderate IHVS (WHVP: 20.38 mm Hg ± 8.38 vs 31.5 mm Hg ± 9.39, P = .026; HVPG: 13.88 mm Hg ± 6.33 vs 25.00 mm Hg ± 9.81, P < .001) and 15 mm Hg lower in patients with severe IHVS (WHVP: 13.45 mm Hg ± 5.28 vs 28.64 mm Hg ± 6.38, P = .017; HVPG: 8.27 mm Hg ± 3.85 vs 23.45 mm Hg ± 6.95, P < .001) than mean portal vein pressure and portal vein gradient.ConclusionsFor patients with moderate or severe IHVS, HVPG might greatly underestimate the actual value of portal vein pressure, and the portal vein should be catheterized to measure portal pressure.