Bronchial Artery Aneurysm: Prevalence,Clinical Characteristics,and Long-Term Prognosis Following Bronchial Artery Embolization

PurposeTo investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and long-term prognosis of bronchial artery aneurysm (BAA) following bronchial artery embolization (BAE).Materials and MethodsThe medical records of consecutive patients who underwent bronchial artery angiography between August 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were diagnosed with BAA during this period were included in this study. The prevalence, patients’ characteristics, symptoms, comorbidities, angiographic findings, and long-term prognosis following BAE were investigated.ResultsBAA was observed in 20 of 508 patients who underwent bronchial artery angiography (3.9%). The patients’ median age was 69 (interquartile range [IQR], 63.5–76.7) years. The main causes of BAA were cryptogenic, bronchiectasis or cystic fibrosis, and pulmonary aspergillosis. The median diameter of ruptured BAAs was significantly smaller than that of unruptured BAAs (5.4 mm [IQR, 4.8–7.3 mm] vs 9.0 mm [IQR, 7.2–13.9 mm], P = .009). All the patients were successfully treated with BAE, without major adverse events. The median follow-up period after BAE was 970 (IQR, 561–1,796) days. The BAA-related survival rate was 100% at 2 and 3 years after BAE, and the overall survival rate after BAE was 89.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.0–89.3) at 2 years and 74.3% (95% CI 74.0–74.5) at 3 years. BAA-related adverse events and mortality did not occur during the follow-up period.ConclusionsBAA was observed in 3.9 % (20/508) of the patients who underwent bronchial artery angiography. All the patients with BAA were successfully treated with BAE. BAA rupture and consequent mortality did not occur during the follow-up period.     

Management of Symptomatic Vascularized Retained Products of Conception by Proximal Uterine Artery Embolization with Gelatin Sponge Torpedoes

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of temporary proximal uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of highly vascularized retained products of conception (RPOCs).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective analysis included women who underwent treatment for vaginal bleeding after abortion, miscarriage, or delivery, with highly vascularized RPOCs detected by Doppler ultrasound (US) (ie, presence of an enhanced myometrial vascularity, a low resistance index of <0.5, and a peak systolic velocity of ≥0.7 m/s). A unilateral or bilateral embolization with torpedoes of gelatin foam was performed. From November 2017 to January 2021, 24 women with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range, 26.0–34.5 years) with symptomatic highly vascularized RPOCs were included. Clinical success was defined as bleeding arrest between the UAE and 1-month follow-up. Technical success was defined as the complete obstruction of at least 1 uterine artery supplying vascular abnormalities. The safety of the procedure according to the classification of the Society of Interventional Radiology and evolution of lesions on US were also reported.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all 24 (100%) patients, with bilateral arterial embolization in 19 (79%) patients and unilateral embolization in 5 (21%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in all 24 (100%) patients. Five patients still had uterine retention at the 1-month follow-up, including 2 patients with highly vascularized RPOCs. Two patients benefited from hysteroscopy, and 3 had noninvasive management. Four minor adverse events were reported (1 patient had infectious endometritis and 3 patients had a postembolization syndrome).ConclusionsProximal UAE with torpedoes of gelatin foam is safe and effective for the management of symptomatic highly vascularized RPOCs.     

Risk Factors Associated with Clinical Failure of Uterine Artery Embolization for Postpartum Hemorrhage

PurposeTo identify risk factors for clinical failure of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), with particular attention to the uterine artery diameter.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent UAE for PPH between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2021. Technical success was defined as the completion of embolization of the arteries thought to be the cause of the bleeding. Clinical success was defined as no recurrent bleeding or need for additional therapeutic interventions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the risk factors associated with clinical failure of UAE.ResultsOf the 47 patients, 6 had recurrent bleeding. Of the 6 patients, 4 underwent hysterectomy, and 2 underwent repeat embolization. The clinical success rate was 87.2% (41/47), with no major adverse events such as uterine infarction or death. In univariate analysis, there were slight differences in multiparity (P = .115) and placental abruption (P = .128) and a significant difference in the findings of a narrow uterine artery on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (P = .005). In multivariate analysis, only a narrow uterine artery on DSA was a significant factor (odds ratio, 18.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–134.8; P = .004).ConclusionsA narrow uterine artery on DSA was a risk factor for clinically unsuccessful UAE for PPH. It may be prudent to conclude the procedure only after it is ensured that vasospasm has been relieved.     

Percutaneous Cryoablation: Safety and Efficacy for Pain Palliation of Metastases to Pleura and Chest Wall

PurposeTo assess safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for pain palliation of metastases to pleura and chest wall.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 22 patients (27% female, mean age 63 y ± 11.4) who underwent 25 cryoablation procedures for pain palliation of 39 symptomatic metastases measuring 5.1 cm ± 1.9 (range, 2.0–8.0 cm) in pleura and chest wall between June 2012 and December 2017. Pain intensity was assessed using a numerical scale (0–10 points). Statistical tests t test, χ², and Wilcoxon signed rank were performed.ResultsPatients were followed for a median of 4.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2.3–10.1; range, 0.1–36.7 mo) before death or loss to follow-up. Following cryoablation, pain intensity decreased significantly by a median of 4.5 points (IQR, 2.8–6; range, 0–10 points; P = .0002 points, Wilcoxon signed rank). Pain relief of at least 3 points was documented following 18 of 20 procedures. Pain relief occurred within a median of 1 day following cryoablation (IQR, 1–2; range, 1–4 d) and lasted for a median of 5 weeks (IQR, 3–17; range, 1–34 wk). Systemic opioid requirements decreased in 11 of 22 patients (50%) by an average of 56% ± 34. Difference in morphine milligram equivalents was not significant (P = .73, Wilcoxon signed rank). No procedure-related complications occurred despite previous radiation of 7 tumors. Of 25 procedures, 22 (88%) were performed on an outpatient basis.ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation for metastases to pleura and chest wall can safely provide significant pain relief within days following a single session.     

Resolution of Pain after Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Extraperitoneal Endometriosis

PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the relief of pain after percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of symptomatic extraperitoneal endometriosis (EE).Material and MethodsFrom 2017 to 2022, cryoablation of EE was performed at a single institution on a total of 47 lesions in 42 consecutive patients (median age, 37 years; interquartile range [IQR], 33–39.5 years). Patient and procedural characteristics were reviewed retrospectively. Tolerance and outcomes in terms of pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated.ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 13.5 months (IQR, 1.1–37.7 months) after cryoablation. The median pain-free survival rate was 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.3–98.4) at 6 months and 82.7% (95% CI, 58.8–93.5) after 12 months. Pain decreased from a median of 8/10 (IQR, 7–9) on the visual analog scale to 0/10 (IQR, 0–1) at the last follow-up (P < .0001). The median Patient Global Impression of Change score recorded at the last follow-up was 1/7 (IQR, 1–2). The efficacy rate of cryoablation to avoid secondary surgery was 92.8% (39/42) per patient and 93.6% (44/47) per nodule treated. Four patients (9.5%, 4/42) experienced an adverse event in the days following the procedure, and 1 patient (2%) experienced a severe adverse event.ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation is safe and effective in significantly reducing pain and obtaining local control of EE.     

Pregnancy Rate and Outcomes following Uterine Artery Embolization for Uterine Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo systematically review published studies on the pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for uterine arteriovenous malformations (UAVMs).Materials and MethodsInternational medical databases were searched for all English-language studies published between 2000 and 2022 on patients with UAVMs who had undergone embolization and had a subsequent pregnancy. Data on the pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, and physiologic status of newborns were extracted from the articles. Ten case series were included in the meta-analysis, and 18 case reports on pregnancy following UAE were reviewed.ResultsIn the case series, 44 pregnancies were reported in 189 patients. The pooled estimate of pregnancy rate was 23.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3%–29.3%). The pregnancy rate was higher in studies of women with a mean age of ≤30 years (50.6% vs 22.2%; P < .05). The pooled estimate of live birth rate was 88.6% (95% CI, 78.6%–98.7%).ConclusionsAll published series report preservation of fertility and successful pregnancies after embolization of UAVMs. The live birth rate in these series does not differ substantially from that of the general population.     

Superior Hypogastric Nerve Block for Pain Control after Uterine Artery Embolization: Effect of Addition of Steroids on Analgesia

Superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) decreases pain and use of narcotic pain medication following uterine artery embolization (UAE). The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of a corticosteroid (triamcinolone) to SHNB on analgesia following UAE. Records of 16 patients were reviewed for when pain occurred or acutely worsened after the procedure. No major complications were identified. Patients reported that pain began or worsened an average of 33.8 hours after the procedure, when their average pain increased from 0.6/10 to 5.9/10 (P < .001). This suggests that addition of triamcinolone to SHNB could result in prolonged analgesia following UAE.     

Pain,Nausea, and Hospital Admission after Uterine Fibroid Embolization: A Comparison of 2 Protocols

Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) procedures performed from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Seventy-two patients were treated with a standard protocol consisting of sedation, ketorolac, ondansetron, and overnight parenteral analgesics and antiemetics. Ninety-six patients were treated with a new protocol, which added transdermal scopolamine, lorazepam, and intravenous acetaminophen. Outpatient uterine fibroid embolization (OP-UFE) not requiring hospitalization was successful in 81.4% and 2.7% of patients treated with the new and old protocols, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 141.4; P < .0001). Procedural fentanyl doses were lower with the new protocol than with the old one (mean, 148 vs 186 mcg; P = .0016). In the new protocol subset, patients were 1.01 times more likely to fail OP-UFE for every microgram increase in procedural fentanyl (OR, 0.99, P = .009), and those presenting with pain were less likely to succeed with OP-UFE than those with bleeding or bulk symptoms (OR, 0.31, P = .04). In conclusion, decreasing the opioid dose while increasing the antiemetic and nonopioid analgesic medications improves the chances of same day discharge after UFE.     

Safety and Efficacy of Arterially Directed Liver Therapies in the Treatment of Hepatic Metastatic Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 locoregional therapies (LRTs) including hepatic artery embolization (HAE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of patients with metastatic ovarian cancer to the liver.Material and MethodsFrom October 2010 to May 2019, the data of 15 consecutive patients (median age, 54 years ± 9.8; range, 35–78 years) with hepatic metastatic ovarian cancer who were treated with either HAE (n = 6; 40%) or TARE (n = 9; 60%) were reviewed. The most common histopathologic type was epithelial ovarian carcinoma (80%). The most common chemotherapy regimens used prior to embolization included carboplatin, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and bevacizumab. Patients received a mean of 4 lines ± 3 (range, 1–9) of chemotherapy. All patients with serous carcinoma were resistant to platinum at the time of embolization. Indications for embolization were progression of disease to the liver while receiving chemotherapy in 14 (93.3%) patients and palliative pain control in 1 patient.ResultsThe overall response rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 92.4%, 85.6%, and 70%, respectively. Median overall survival from the time of LRT was 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4–14) months. Median local tumor progression was 6.4 months ± 5.03 (95% CI, 3.3–9.5). No grade 3–5 adverse events were detected in either group.ConclusionsHAE and TARE were well tolerated in patients with metastatic ovarian cancer to the liver and possibly ensured prolonged disease control in heavily treated, predominantly in patients resistant to platinum. Larger numbers are needed to verify these data.     

Comparison of Opioid Medication Use after Conventional Chemoembolization versus Drug-Eluting Embolic Chemoembolization

PurposeTo assess the use of opioid analgesics and/or antiemetic drugs for pain and nausea following selective chemoembolization with doxorubicin-based conventional (c)-transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting embolic (DEE)-transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsFrom October 2014 to 2016, 283 patients underwent 393 selective chemoembolization procedures including 188 patients (48%) who underwent c-transarterial chemoembolization and 205 (52%) who underwent DEE-transarterial chemoembolization. Medical records for all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Administration of postprocedural opioid and/or antiemetic agents were collated. Time of administration was stratified as phase 1 recovery (0–6 hours) and observation (6–24 hours). Logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship of transarterial chemoembolization type and use of intravenous and/or oral analgesic and antiemetic medications while controlling for other clinical variables.ResultsMore patients treated with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required intravenous analgesia in the observation (6–24 hours) phase (18.5%) than those treated with c-transarterial chemoembolization (10.6%; P = .033). Similar results were noted for oral analgesic agents (50.2% vs. 31.4%, respectively; P < .001) and antiemetics (17.1% vs. 7.5%, respectively; P = .006) during the observation period. Multivariate regression models identified DEE-transarterial chemoembolization as an independent predictor for oral analgesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P = .011), for intravenous and oral analgesia in opioid-naïve patients (OR, 2.46; P = .029) and for antiemetics (OR, 2.56; P = .011).ConclusionsCompared to c-transarterial chemoembolization, DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required greater amounts of opioid analgesic and antiemetic agents 6–24 hours after the procedure. Surgical data indicate that a persistent opioid habit can develop even after minor surgeries, therefore, caution should be exercised, and a regimen of nonopiate pain medications should be considered to reduce postprocedural pain after transarterial chemoembolization.     

Repeat Evaluation of Lung Shunt Fraction is Unnecessary: A Retrospective Observational Study of Successive Lung Shunt Fractions from Variable Arterial Distributions in Patients Undergoing Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Liver Tumors

PurposeTo evaluate whether the recalculation of lung shunt fraction (LSF) is necessary prior to next-stage or same lobe repeat radioembolization.Materials and MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent radioembolization between February 2008 and December 2018. Eighty of 312 patients had repeat mapping angiograms and LSF calculations. A total of 160 LSF calculations were made using planar imaging (155, [97%]) and single-photon emission computed tomography (5 [3%]) technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin hepatic arterial injection imaging. The mean patient age was 61.8 years ± 12.7; 69 (86%) patients had metastatic disease and 11 (14%) had hepatocellular carcinoma.ResultsPatients had a median LSF of 5% (interquartile range [IQR] 3%–9%) with a median absolute difference of 1.25 (IQR 0.65–3.4) and a median of 76 days (IQR 42.5–120 days) between repeat LSF calculations. There was a median change in LSF of 0.2% between mapping studies (P = .11). There was no statistical significance between the repeat LSFs regardless of the arterial distribution (P = .79) or between tumor types (P = .75). No patients exceeded lung dose limits using actual or predicted prescribed dose amounts. The actual median lung dose was 2.6 Gy (IQR 1.8–4.4 Gy, maximum = 20.5) for the first radioembolization and 2.0 Gy (IQR 1.3–3.7 Gy, maximum = 10.1) for the second radioembolization.ConclusionsNo significant difference in LSF was identified between different time points and arterial distributions within the same patient undergoing repeat radioembolization. In patients who receive well under 30-Gy lung dose for the initial treatment and a 50-Gy cumulative lung dose, repeat radioembolization treatments in the same patient may not require a repeat LSF calculation.     

Splenic Artery Embolization after Delayed Splenic Rupture Following Blunt Trauma: Is Nonoperative Management Still an Option in This Cohort?

Patients treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE) >48 hours after a blunt injury for a delayed splenic rupture (DSR) were assessed for the need for a subsequent splenectomy. Thirty-four patients underwent SAE for DSR over 10 years at our level 1 trauma center, performed at a median of 4.5 days after the injury (interquartile range = 5.5), and the patients were followed up for a median of 11 months (interquartile range = 31). There were 3 occurrences of rebleeds, and 2 patients required splenectomy (5.9%). This study showed that treatment with SAE after DSR results in splenic salvage in 94.1% of patients.     

Embolization versus Surgery for Stabilized Patients with Solid Organ Injury

PurposeTo compare embolization with laparotomy for the management of hemodynamically unstable patients with solid organ injury who responded to initial resuscitation.Materials and MethodsData from a Japanese nationwide trauma registry were analyzed. Included were hemodynamically unstable patients (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and blood transfusion within the first 24 hours) whose initial computed tomography assessment confirmed the presence of solid organ injuries (liver and/or spleen). A total of 224 patients were included (median age: 53 years, interquartile range: 32–69; 73.3% male; liver injury = 131 [58%] and spleen injury = 98 [44%]; median organ injury scale: 3, interquartile range: 3–4; median injury severity score: 19, interquartile range: 16–25). Patients who underwent embolization were compared with those who underwent laparotomy. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. The data were evaluated using a propensity score matching analysis.ResultsLaparotomy and embolization were performed in 133 (59.1%) and 91 (40.4%) patients, respectively. Of those, 111 (84%) and 84 (92%) patients achieved in-hospital survival after laparotomy and embolization, respectively. No significant difference in in-hospital survival (P = .053) was noted. The propensity score matching model did not reveal a significant difference in in-hospital survival (P = .276).ConclusionsNo significant difference was observed between embolization and laparotomy in terms of in-hospital survival among unstable patients who responded to initial resuscitation with solid organ injury.     

Embolization of the Superior Rectal Arteries versus Closed Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson Technique) in the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PurposeTo compare short-term and medium-term results of superior rectal artery embolization versus surgical hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal disease.Material and MethodsThis study was a prospective randomized clinical trial following 33 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease Grades 2 and 3 who were randomly assigned to 2 different groups: the superior rectal artery embolization group (n = 15) and Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy surgical group (n = 14). Four patients were excluded from the analysis. Pain using the visual analog scale and the use of analgesics were evaluated 3 times daily during the first 7 days of the postoperative period. Recurrent symptoms and satisfaction with treatment were also evaluated in the subsequent first, third, sixth, and twelfth months.ResultsThe mean pain during the first bowel movement after the procedure was 6.08 ± 4.41 in the surgery group and 0 in the embolization group (P = .001). The mean use of pain medication was higher in the surgery group (28.92 doses ± 15.78 vs 2.4 doses ± 5.21; P < .001). In the embolization group, the most prevalent preprocedural symptom was bleeding in 14 patients, with complete improvement in 12 (83.3%) patients. Mucus, skin tag, and pruritus were symptoms that showed little improvement in both groups. The frequency of symptoms (bleeding, pain, prolapse, and pruritus) was similar between the groups at 12 months (P = .691). No severe adverse events were observed in both groups.ConclusionsDespite no difference in outcomes, embolization of the superior rectal arteries for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease showed pain levels lower than those observed after surgical treatment.     

Outcomes of Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization from a Multidisciplinary Outpatient Interventional Center

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of outpatient transarterial embolization for symptomatic refractory internal hemorrhoids.Materials and MethodsRetrospective analysis of 134 patients who underwent hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids between August 2021 and June 2022 (76 men and 58 women) was performed. The mean age was 54.9 years, with a mean Goligher hemorrhoid grade (HG) of 2.1. Branches of the superior rectal artery (SRA) or middle rectal artery supplying the corpus cavernosum recti were embolized with both spherical particles and microcoils. Standard-of-care evaluations were performed at baseline and the 1 month follow-up, which included hemorrhoid-related pain (HRP) (0–10), hemorrhoid symptoms score (HSS) (5–20), quality of life (QoL) (0–4), French bleeding score (FBS) (0–9), and HG (0–4). Clinical success was defined as improvement of symptoms without additional treatment.ResultsEmbolization of at least 1 hemorrhoidal artery was achieved in 133 (99%) of the 134 patients. The mean number of SRA branches embolized per patient was 2.9 ± 1.0. Clinical success was seen in 93% (124 of 134) of patients at the 1-month follow-up, with 10 patients requiring repeat embolization. There were significant improvements in all mean outcomes at 1 month: HSS (11–7.8; P < .01), HRP (4.1–1.3; P < .01), QoL (2.2–0.8; P < .01), FBS (4.4–2.2; P < .01), and HG (2.3–1.2; P < .05). There were no severe adverse events.ConclusionsHAE is a safe and effective outpatient treatment for refractory symptomatic internal hemorrhoids in the short term.     

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Benign Chronic Inflammatory Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory joint pain via systematic review and meta-analysis.Materials and MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain treated with TAE. Meta-analyses of pain score changes, changes in proportions of patients on analgesic medications, range of motion changes, technical success rates, and adverse events rates were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to pain site (knee versus shoulder).ResultsFourteen observational studies, which included 346 patients, were reviewed. The pooled technical success rate was 95.8%, and no major adverse events were observed. The pooled mean difference in pain score at 1 week was 3.1. At 1, 3, and 6 months, the difference in score was 4.0, 4.2, and 5.1, respectively. At 1 year, the difference was 5.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that shoulder embolization was associated with greater reduction of pain than knee embolization at 3 and 6 months (P < .001 and P = .018, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference between the sites at 1 month (P = .734). The pooled proportions of patients on analgesic medication at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 81.1%, 36.3%, 42.3%, 28.2%, and 22.4%, respectively. The pooled estimated increase in the range of motion among patients who underwent shoulder embolization was 55.6° for anterior elevation and 64.7° for abduction.ConclusionsTAE is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain.     

Development and Preliminary Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation Questionnaire: A Prospective Cohort Study

PurposeTo develop and validate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vascular Malformation (PROVAM) questionnaire to assess the health-related quality of life in patients with vascular malformations.Materials and MethodsWe developed and validated PROVAM using a mixed methods design during a prospective clinical trial at a vascular anomalies clinic. From July 2019 to February 2020, 108 consecutive patients completed 130 questionnaires. The 30-item instrument assessed the domains of pain, emotional/social well-being, functional impact, and treatment satisfaction. Two additional items assessed ease of understanding and relevance. The primary outcomes of instrument reliability and validity were evaluated across several indices. The secondary outcome of responsiveness evaluated total score changes for patients who completed questionnaires both before and after treatment.ResultsInstrument reliability, as measured by Cronbach alpha, was ≥0.79 for pain, emotional/social well-being, and functional impact domains. Primary domain structure was confirmed by factor analysis (P <. 001) and convergent construct validity for all but 1 Likert scale item. In the subgroup analysis of 13 participants who completed PROVAM before and after treatment, instrument responsiveness, as measured by the total score, showed a significant decrease (median, ?10 points; interquartile range [IQR], ?3 to ?16; P = .04). Participants found the questions easy to understand (median, 5 points; IQR, 4–5 on a 5-point scale) and relevant (median score, 4; IQR, 3–5).ConclusionsPreliminary data support the reliability and validity of PROVAM in measuring the health-related quality of life in patients with vascular malformations.     

Preoperative Transarterial Embolization of Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma Using n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate: Case-Control Comparison with Microspheres

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA) for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA).Materials and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on patients with JNA who underwent TAE and endoscopic resection between 2020 and 2022. Patients embolized with nBCA were identified, and those embolized with microspheres were set as the control group. Data on demographics, symptoms, tumor characteristics, blood loss, adverse events, residual disease, and recurrence were collected, and case-control analysis was performed for the 2 groups. Differences in characteristics between the groups were tested using the Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to analyze the univariate and multivariate influences on blood loss.ResultsTwenty patients were included in this study: 13 in the microsphere group and 7 in the nBCA group. The median blood loss was 400 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 200–520 mL) in the nBCA group and 1,000 mL (IQR, 500–1,000 mL) in the microsphere group (P = .028). The GLM confirmed lower blood loss in the nBCA group (relative risk, 0.58 [0.41–0.83]; P = .01). A residual tumor was found in 1 patient in each group (7.7% vs 14.3%; P = 1.000). Recurrence was not observed in any patient. None of the patients experienced adverse events during embolization.ConclusionsTAE of advanced JNA with nBCA glue is safe and effective and can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss compared with microspheres.     

Safety and Effectiveness of a Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique for Large-Bore Access Closure after Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sequential sutures and plugged vascular closure devices (VCDs) for large-bore access closure during percutaneous access endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR).Materials and MethodsData on 16 patients who underwent PEVAR at the authors’ center from January 2022 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 59–75 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. All patients received sequential suture and plug VCDs using dual Exoseal after 1 Proglide for access closure. Success was defined as the ability to achieve complete hemostasis and was confirmed by ultrasonography. The patients were followed up for access-related adverse events at 30 and 90 days after the procedure, and the severity was graded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification.ResultsOverall, 24 access sites were included. The median sheath size was 21 F (IQR, 18–23 F). The median hemostasis time was 11.0 minutes (IQR, 9.3–13.0 minutes), the median procedural time was 133.5 minutes (IQR, 102.5–151.0 minutes), and the median length of stay was 5 days (IQR, 4.0–6.8 days). The success rate was 95.8%, and a pseudoaneurysm (SIR Grade 2) developed in 1 patient, which was treated by a percutaneous injection of thrombin. No other access-related adverse events occurred, and the total adverse event rate was 4.2%.ConclusionsPlacement of sequential suture and plug VCDs using 1 Proglide and dual Exoseal is a safe and effective method and may be an option for access closure during PEVAR.