Exploring the physician's role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion in the US

ObjectiveWe explored how physicians conceptualize their role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion, including identifying clinician attitudes that may lead to patients’ perceptions of contraceptive coercion.Study designWe conducted individual semi-structured interviews using questions based on components of the Theory of Planned Behavior. We recruited physician abortion providers using purposeful sampling to attain diversity in practice setting and geographic practice region. We analyzed transcribed interviews using initial and values coding methods.ResultsWe interviewed 39 participants across the United States, who primarily self-reported as White female obstetrician gynecologists (OB/GYNs) aged 25 to 44. Over half of participants practiced in an academic setting. Participants perceived providing patient education and taking a patient-centered approach as part of their role in contraceptive counseling. Participants also believed it was their responsibility to prevent unintended pregnancies and subsequent abortions among their patients. External motivations behind this belief included wanting patients to avoid the challenges of obtaining another abortion, particularly in states with multiple abortion restrictions. Internal motivations included valuing professional goal attainment, discomfort with abortion, and abortion stigma. When physicians counseled about contraception, many expressed preferences toward methods of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and an emphasis on contraception provision for adolescents and women with prior abortions.ConclusionsPhysicians providing abortions strive to use a patient-centered approach to contraceptive counseling. However, many continue to be motivated by the goal of avoiding a subsequent abortion which patients may perceive as coercion towards contraceptive uptake.ImplicationsConsidering contraceptive counseling as a means to prevent subsequent abortion may lead to coercive practices, especially with specific patient populations. Moral codes and abortion stigma influence physicians’ counseling practices and physicians must examine their personal values and motivations behind recommending contraception after an abortion.     

Are Illinois Contraceptive Providers Comfortable Providing Care to Adolescents? Results From a Statewide Provider Needs Assessment

ObjectivesLegislation allows adolescents to access comprehensive contraceptive care; however, provider practices remain unclear. We examined predictors of provider knowledge and comfort surrounding the provision of contraceptive care to adolescents.MethodsWe mailed a survey to Illinois contraceptive providers (n = 251). Study outcomes include 1) knowledge of adolescent consent laws, 2) comfort asking for time alone with adolescents, 3) comfort providing contraception to adolescents without parental consent, and 4) comfort providing long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) to adolescents without parental consent. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsMost providers are knowledgeable of consent laws (90%) and report being comfortable asking for time alone with adolescents (94%) and comfortable providing contraception to adolescents without parental consent (88%). Having a large proportion of patients who are eligible for family planning services was associated with increased comfort asking for time alone with adolescents (aOR, 7.03; 95% CI, 1.58–31.3) and providing contraception to adolescents (aOR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4–11.1). Only one-half (54%) were comfortable providing LARC methods to adolescents, with higher comfort among providers who: received more than 2 days of formal family planning training (aOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.2–6.2), specialized in obstetrics-gynecology (aOR, 5.64; 95% CI, 2.1–15.1), and had a patient population with more than 50% patients from minoritized racial/ethnic groups (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2–6.6).ConclusionsAlthough knowledge of consent laws was high, gaps remain. Only one-half of our sample indicated comfort with the provision of LARC methods without parental consent. Additional efforts to increase provider comfort with all contraceptive methods and training on adolescent-centered practices may be required to meet the needs of adolescent patients.     

Telehealth for Contraceptive Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Provider Perspectives

BackgroundTelehealth use rapidly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, including for contraceptive care (e.g., counseling and method provision). This study explored providers’ experiences with contraceptive care via telehealth.MethodsWe conducted a survey with open-ended responses among contraceptive providers across the United States. The study population included physicians, nurse practitioners, health educators, and other health professionals (n = 546). Data were collected from April 10, 2020, to January 29, 2021. We conducted qualitative content analysis of the open-ended responses.ResultsProviders highlighted the benefits of telehealth, including continuing access to contraceptive services and accommodating patients who faced challenges attending in-person contraceptive visits. Providers at school-based health centers reported telehealth allowed them to reach young people while schools were closed. However, many providers noted a lack of patient awareness about the availability of telehealth services and disparities in access to technology. Providers felt there was less personal connection in virtual contraceptive counseling, noted challenges with confidentiality, and expressed concern about the inability to provide the full range of contraceptive methods through telehealth alone.ConclusionsThe pandemic significantly impacted contraceptive health care delivery. Telehealth has sustained access to contraception in important ways, but has been accompanied by various challenges, including technological access and confidentiality. As hybrid models of care evolve, it is important to assess how telehealth can play a role in providing contraceptive care while addressing its barriers.     

Identifying Counseling Needs of Nulliparous Adolescent Intrauterine Contraceptive Users: A Qualitative Approach

PurposeTo describe the intrauterine contraception (IUC) adoption process among nulliparous adolescents and to identify the role of the medical provider in this trajectory.MethodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with a clinic-based sample of 20 nulliparous adolescents (aged 15–24 years) with a history of IUC use. Interviews were analyzed using modified grounded theory and cross-case analysis to reveal a process model for IUC adoption, with a focus on the role of the medical provider.ResultsThe model includes the following stages: first awareness, initial reaction, information gathering, adoption, and adjustment and reassessment. It is influenced by personal preferences and experiences, friends, family, sexual partner(s), and medical providers. Interactions with medical providers that study participants found helpful in navigating the adoption process included the use of visuals; tailored counseling to address specific contraceptive needs; assurance that IUC discontinuation was an option; information on a wide range of side effects; medical provider self-disclosure regarding use of IUC; and addressing and validating concerns, both before and after IUC insertion.ConclusionsNulliparous adolescents in this study described a complex IUC adoption process in which the medical provider plays a substantial supportive role. Findings from this study may be used to counsel and support future nulliparous adolescents regarding IUC use.     

Provider Perspectives of Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Use among Women with Substance Use Disorders

ObjectivesPrevious studies conducted from the patient perspective indicate that women with substance use disorders (SUDs) experience extensive barriers to contraceptive access and use (CAU), but there is limited research investigating this topic from the provider perspective. We explored provider perspectives on the barriers to CAU for women with SUDs. As a secondary objective, we highlighted provider contraceptive counseling strategies to address patient CAU barriers.MethodsWe conducted 24 qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of women's health providers, including medical doctors, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives. We used thematic analysis to code the interviews with inductive codes and organized findings according to levels of influence within the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model, a socioecological model of health.ResultsProvider-reported barriers to CAU were identified at four levels of socioecological influence and included reproductive misconceptions; active substance use; trauma, interpersonal violence, and reproductive coercion; limited social support; lack of housing, employment, health insurance, and transportation; stigma; discrimination; and punitive prenatal substance use policies and child welfare reporting requirements. Strategies for addressing CAU barriers mainly focused on patient-centered communication, including open information exchange, shared decision-making, and relationship building. However, providers described disproportionately highlighting the benefits of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and directing conversations toward LARC when they perceived that such methods would help patients to overcome adherence and other challenges related to active substance use or logistical barriers. Notably, there was no mention of CAU facilitators during the interviews.ConclusionsProviders perceived that women with SUDs experience a range of CAU barriers, which they addressed within the clinical setting through use of both patient-centered communication and highlighting the benefits of LARC when they perceived that such methods would help clients to overcome barriers. Improving CAU for women with SUDs will require multidisciplinary, multipronged strategies that prioritize reproductive autonomy and are implemented across clinical, community, and policy settings.     

Experiences with Prenatal and Postpartum Contraceptive Services among Women with a Preterm Birth

BackgroundProviding postpartum contraception can help to achieve recommended interpregnancy intervals (≥18 months from birth to next pregnancy), decrease the risk of preterm birth, and thus improve maternal and infant health outcomes of future pregnancies. However, the experiences of women with preterm birth regarding contraceptive services have not been documented. We sought to better understand contraceptive counseling experiences and postpartum contraception of women with a preterm birth.MethodsWe interviewed 35 women, ages 18–42 years, with a recent preterm birth in California. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using ATLAS.ti v.8.ResultsWomen had public (n = 15), private (n = 16), or no insurance (n = 4) at the time of the interview. Women were mainly Latina (n = 14), Caucasian (n = 9), or African American (n = 6); 15 women were foreign born. Women's experiences ranged from spontaneous preterm births to births with severe medical complications. We identified five themes that were associated with women's engagement in the contraceptive method choice and understanding of birth spacing: 1) timing and frequency of contraceptive counseling; 2) quality of patient–provider interaction and ability to follow up on questions; 3) women's personal experiences with contraceptive use and experiences of other women; 4) context in which contraceptive counseling was framed; and 5) system barriers to contraceptive use.ConclusionsPostpartum contraceptive counseling should address women's preterm birth experience, medical conditions, age, contraceptive preference, and childbearing plans. Having a preterm birth intensifies gaps in hospital and outpatient clinic coordination and provider–patient communication that can lead to use of less effective or no contraceptive methods and risk of early subsequent unplanned pregnancies.     

Effect of shared contraceptive experiences on IUD use at an urban abortion clinic

BackgroundWe studied the effect of contraceptive social networking on postabortion intrauterine device (IUD) uptake. This study explores whether women who have heard personal stories of IUD use are more likely to use an IUD for postabortion contraception.Study DesignWe surveyed 299 women undergoing induced abortion at San Francisco General Hospital's Women's Options Center before and after contraceptive counseling. Both English- and Spanish-speaking women, aged 15 years and older, were surveyed.ResultsFifty percent of women surveyed chose to use an IUD for postabortion contraception. Women choosing IUDs were more likely than women choosing other contraceptives or no contraceptives to be multiparous, Latina and interested in IUDs prior to contraceptive counseling. Disclosure of personal IUD use by a clinic staff member was independently associated with the decision to use an IUD (odds ratio 8.1, 95% confidence interval 3.8–17.2).ConclusionsWomen undergoing abortion in an urban clinic have knowledge and high acceptance of IUDs, and sharing of contraceptive experiences is common among women of all demographics. Controlling for demographics and prior knowledge of IUDs, sharing of personal IUD experiences by providers is significantly associated with IUD use.     

Patient and provider perspectives on Bedsider.org,an online contraceptive information tool,in a low income,racially diverse clinic population

ObjectiveTo explore patient and provider perspectives regarding a new Web-based contraceptive support tool.Study DesignWe conducted a qualitative study at an urban Medicaid-based clinic among sexually active women interested in starting a new contraceptive method, clinic providers and staff. All participants were given the opportunity to explore Bedsider, an online contraceptive support tool developed for sexually active women ages 18–29 by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy and endorsed by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Focus groups were conducted separately among patient participants and clinic providers/staff using open-ended structured interview guides to identify specific themes and key concepts related to use of this tool in an urban clinic setting.ResultsPatient participants were very receptive to this online contraceptive support tool, describing it as trustworthy, accessible and empowering. In contrast, clinic providers and staff had concerns regarding the Website's legitimacy, accessibility, ability to empower patients and applicability, which limited their willingness to recommend its use to patients.ConclusionContrasting opinions regarding Bedsider may point to a potential disconnect between how providers and patients view contraception information tools. Further qualitative and quantitative studies are needed to explore women's perspectives on contraceptive education and counseling and providers' understanding of these perspectives.Implications StatementThis study identifies a contrast between how patients and providers in an urban clinic setting perceive a Web-based contraceptive tool. Given a potential patient–provider discrepancy in preferred methods and approaches to contraceptive counseling, additional research is needed to enhance this important arena of women's health care.     

Understanding Factors Associated with Postpartum Visit Attendance and Contraception Choices: Listening to Low-Income Postpartum Women and Health Care Providers

Background While there is considerable variability with respect to attendance at the postpartum visit, not much is known about women’s preferences with respect to postpartum care. Likewise, there is also limited information on providers’ practices regarding the postpartum visit and care including the delivery of contraception. To understand and address deficits in the delivery and utilization of postpartum care, we examined the perceptions of low-income postpartum women with respect to barriers to and preferences for the timing and location of the postpartum visit and receipt of contraception. We also examined providers’ current prenatal and postnatal care practices for promoting the use of postpartum care and their attitudes toward alternative approaches for delivering contraceptive services in the postpartum period. Methods Qualitative face-to-face interviews were completed with 20 postpartum women and in-depth qualitative phone interviews were completed with 12 health care providers who had regular contact with postpartum women. Interviews were coded using Atlas.ti software and themes were identified. Results Women believed that receiving care during the postpartum period was an important resource for monitoring physical and mental health and also strongly supported the provision of contraception earlier than the 6-week postpartum visit. Providers reported barriers to women’s use of postpartum care on the patient, provider, and system levels. However, providers were receptive to exploring new clinical practices that may widen the reach of postpartum care and increase access to postpartum contraception. Conclusion Approaches that increase the flexibility and convenience of postpartum care and the delivery of postpartum contraception may increase the likelihood that women will take advantage of essential postpartum services.     

More Than a Destination: Contraceptive Decision Making as a Journey

BackgroundContraceptive use is widely recognized as a means of reducing adverse health-related outcomes. However, dominant paradigms of contraceptive counseling may rely on a narrow definition of “evidence” (i.e., scientifically accurate but exclusive of individual women's experiences). Given increased enthusiasm for long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods, such paradigms may reinforce counseling that overprivileges effectiveness, particularly for groups considered at high risk of unintended pregnancy. This study investigates where and how women's experiences fit into the definition of evidence these counseling protocols use.MethodsUsing a qualitative approach, this analysis draws on semistructured interviews with 38 young (ages 18–24) Black and Latina women. We use a qualitative content analysis approach, with coding categories derived directly from the textual data.FindingsOur analysis suggests that contraceptive decision making is an iterative, relational, reflective journey. Throughout contraceptive histories, participants described experiences evolving to create a foundation from which decision-making power was drawn. The same contraceptive-related decisions were revisited repeatedly, with knowledge accrued along the way. The cumulative experience of using, assigning meanings to, and developing values around contraception meant that young women experienced contraceptive decision making as a dynamic process.Implications for PracticeThis journey creates a rich body of evidence that informs contraceptive decision making. To provide appropriate, acceptable, patient-centered family planning care, providers must engage with evidence grounded in women's expertise on their contraceptive use in addition to medically accurate data on method effectiveness, side effects, and contraindications.     

Hormonal contraception,breastfeeding and bedside advocacy: the case for patient-centered care

Postpartum contraceptive decision making is complex, and recommendations may be influenced by breastfeeding intentions. While biologically plausible, concerns about the adverse impact of hormonal contraception on breast milk production have not been supported by the clinical evidence to date. However, the data have limitations, which can lead providers with different priorities around contraception and breastfeeding to interpret the data in a way that advances their personal priorities. Discrepancies in interpretations can lead to divergent recommendations for individual women and may cause conflict. Furthermore, providers must recognize that decision making about contraception and breastfeeding takes place in complex cultural, historical and socioeconomic contexts. Implicit bias may influence a provider's counseling. Unrecognized biases toward one patient or another, or one practice or another, may influence a provider's counseling. It is crucial for providers to strive to recognize their own biases. Providers need to respectfully recognize each patient's values and preferences regarding hormonal contraception and breastfeeding. Developing a patient-centered decision tool or implementing patient-centered interview techniques specifically around breastfeeding and contraception could help to minimize provider-driven variability in care.     

Contraception decision-making and care among reproductive-aged women with autoimmune diseases

ObjectiveIn this qualitative study, we sought to understand better the contraception-related experiences and decision-making of women with autoimmune diseases, a group at high risk for adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.Study designWe conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with women ages 18 to 45 who had at least one autoimmune disease diagnosis. Our team recruited from outpatient rheumatology clinics in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We analyzed our data for content and themes, using inductive and deductive techniques and the constant comparison approach.ResultsThe 30 women in the sample ranged from 25 to 44 years old; most were white (73%), married (52%), and had at least one child (53%). Four themes emerged from our interviews: (1) Women's decisions to use contraception were strongly influenced by their diseases and perceptions of their health; (2) Women felt that hormonal contraception was unsafe in the context of their diseases, even women without clear disease-related health risks; (3) Health care providers influenced women's consideration and selection of contraceptive methods; (4) Women rarely expected that their rheumatologists would prescribe their contraception, yet their contraception prescribers lacked knowledge about their disease-specific health risks.ConclusionsWomen perceived that hormonal contraception is unsafe in the context of their autoimmune diseases and cited medication fatigue and safety concerns as reasons why they did not use contraception. Some women did not appear to receive patient-centered contraception counseling from providers. Our interviews reveal areas for improving contraception care, including augmenting shared decision-making and educating patients and providers about contraception safety.ImplicationsOur findings highlight potential tensions between patients’ preferences for contraception, safety considerations, and ethical and medically responsible contraception care by health care providers in the rheumatology context. Future work is needed to develop person-centered, medically-appropriate models for contraception care that meet the needs of medically vulnerable populations.     

Required examinations and tests before initiating contraception: Provider practices from a national cross-sectional survey

Objective(s)We estimated the prevalence of requiring specific examinations or tests before providing contraception in a nationwide survey of family planning providers.Study DesignWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of public-sector health centers and office-based physicians providing family planning services across the United States in 2019 (n = 1395). We estimated the weighted proportion of providers (or their health center or practice) who required blood pressure measurement, pelvic examination (bimanual examination and cervical inspection), Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, clinical breast examination (CBE), and chlamydia and gonorrhea (CT/GC) screening before initiating hormonal or intrauterine contraception (IUC) for healthy women. We performed multivariable regression to identify factors associated with pelvic examination practices aligned with clinical recommendations; these recommendations classify examinations and tests as recommended or unnecessary before initiation of specific contraceptive methods.ResultsThe overall response rate was 51%. Most providers required blood pressure measurement before initiating each method. Unnecessary CBE, Pap smears, and CT/GC screening were required by 14% to 33% of providers across methods. Fifty-two to 62% of providers required recommended pelvic examination before IUC placement; however, 16% to 23% of providers required unnecessary pelvic examinations before non-intrauterine hormonal method initiation. Factors associated with recommendation-aligned pelvic examination practices included having a higher proportion of patients using public funding (Medicaid or other assistance) and more recently completing formal clinical training.ConclusionsAlmost half (47%) of providers did not require necessary pelvic examination before placing IUC. Conversely, many providers required unnecessary examinations and tests before contraception initiation for patients.ImplicationsMost providers required the few recommended examinations and tests for safe contraceptive provision. Reduction of unnecessary examinations and tests may reduce barriers to contraceptive access. There are also opportunities to increase use of recommended examinations, as up to 48% of providers did not require recommended pelvic examination before IUC.     

The process of opting for female permanent contraception: A qualitative study of women’s experiences in Sweden

ObjectivesWe aimed to explore Swedish women's decision-making experiences regarding permanent contraception.Study designIn this study, we included 17 women aged 30–48 who were scheduled to undergo female permanent contraceptive procedures. We conducted semistructured interviews using two broad open-ended questions. We analyzed these data using systematic text condensation based on the principles of psychological phenomenological analysis.ResultsThe interviewees experienced no counseling or support from health care workers regarding permanent contraception until they specifically asked for it. Participants reported that they themselves place the responsibility of permanent contraception solely on women. Consequently, our participants described feeling hesitancy and ambivalence in the process of deciding to have the procedure. Once the decision was made and the women were on the waiting lists for surgery, they experienced relief and empowerment.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that health care providers in Sweden miss opportunities to support patient-centered decision-making regarding permanent contraception. This study indicates that women make deliberate and considered decisions regarding permanent contraception and are best positioned to know when the procedure should take place in their reproductive lives.Implication statementsHealth care professionals should discuss permanent contraception as an option with all women desiring contraception to allow them to decide if that method is right for them.     

How can Primary Care Physicians Best Support Contraceptive Decision Making? A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of Baltimore Latinas

ObjectivesU.S. Latinas experience disproportionately high rates of unintended pregnancy and low rates of consistent contraception use. Not well known are Latinas' perspectives about how primary care physicians (PCPs) might facilitate or deter contraceptive decision making. The theory of planned behavior has been used previously to explain contraceptive behaviors. This study used the theory of planned behavior as a guide to help describe Latinas' perspectives regarding specific factors that influence their contraceptive decision making and to describe their perspectives about the role of PCPs in the decision making.Study Design and MethodsWe conducted focus groups (n = 3) and interviews (n = 8) of Latinas ages 15 to 24 years, recruited from urban primary care sites in Baltimore, Maryland. Concepts from the theory of planned behavior were used to develop a coding scheme and guide identification of themes.ResultsSixteen Latinas participated; all were immigrants.ThemesThe desire to avoid unintended pregnancy is dominant and, not surprisingly, is the main driver of contraceptive intentions. The role of PCPs in contraceptive decision making is to build strong patient relationships through heightened communication and trust. PCPs should develop trust and foster communication by using a shared decision-making approach in contraceptive counseling. Religious norms rarely operate as barriers to contraceptive use, yet positive reinforcement from family, friends, and schools is viewed as supportive.Conclusions and ImplicationsFor this group of young, immigrant Latinas, there is a pervasive desire for effective communication and trusting relationships with PCPs. Findings suggest that providers can facilitate contraceptive decision making for this population by using a shared decision-making approach to contraceptive counseling.