Systemische Therapie des hepatozellul?ren Karzinoms

Sorafenib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic activity is currently the only approved systemic treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It inhibits VEGFR-2, PDGFR and c-KIT signaling pathways as well as BRAF. In the pivotal western study in patients with advanced HCC, sorafenib resulted in a 3 months improved overall survival compared to placebo. This trend was comparable in the pivotal Asian phase 3 study and has also been confirmed in large post-market registries. The main side effects of sorafenib are diarrhea, skin toxicity, fatigue and hypertension. Other systemic treatments are currently not approved but are being investigated in numerous randomized phase 2 and pivotal phase 3 studies either as alternative first line therapy (brivanib or linifanib), as a sorafenib add-on (erlotinib or doxorubicin) or after sorafenib failure (brivanib, everolimus, ramucirumab, tivantinib and others). Moreover, the use of sorafenib as adjuvant treatment after potential curative resection or ablation and the combination of sorafenib or brivanib together with transarterial chemoembolization are currently being investigated in randomized clinical trials.     

Brivanib治疗肝癌的临床研究进展

Brivanib可同时抑制成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR)-1、FGFR-2、FGFR-3、血管内皮细胞生长因子受体(VEGFR)-2和VEGFR-3,以达到抑制肿瘤新生血管形成及肿瘤细胞生长的作用。旨在总结Brivanib治疗肝癌的进展,已完成的Ⅰ和Ⅱ期临床试验结果均证实了Brivanib在肝癌治疗中的安全性和有效性。然而,1项已完成的Ⅲ期随机双盲安慰剂对照研究表明,Brivanib作为晚期肝癌二线治疗手段(即Sorafenib治疗失败者)并未显著改善患者的总体生存期。另1项Ⅲ期随机双盲对照试验结果也表明,Brivanib作为晚期肝癌一线治疗手段并未比Sorafenib显著改善患者的总体生存期。这2项临床试验的失败使得其他两项有关Brivanib治疗肝癌的临床试验提前终止。通过分析以上研究认为亚组分析以及事先筛选Brivanib可能获益的肝癌患者(即FGF信号途径激活的肝癌患者)也许对进一步探究Brivanib的在肝癌治疗中的角色是必要的。     

Treatment strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib vs hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

Sorafenib is used worldwide as a first-line standardsystemic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) on the basis of the results of two large-scale Phase Ⅲ trials. Conversely,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) is one of the most recommended treatments in Japan. Although there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing sorafenib with HAIC,several retrospective analyses have shown no significant differences in survival between the two therapies. Outcomes are favorable for HCC patients exhibiting macroscopic vascular invasion when treated with HAIC rather than sorafenib,whereas in HCC patients exhibiting extrahepatic spread or resistance to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,good outcomes are achieved by treatment with sorafenib rather than HAIC. Additionally,sorafenib is generally used to treat patients with Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is indicated for those with either Child-Pugh A or B. Based on these findings,we reviewed treatment strategies for advanced HCC. We propose that sorafenib might be used as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC patients without macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is recommended for those with macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A or B. Additional research is required to determine the best second-line treatment for HAIC non-responders with Child-Pugh B through future clinical trials.     

Complete response to sorafenib in a patient with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Partial hepatectomy is still the treatment of choice aiming at a cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), provided that the patient can tolerate the treatment. For patients with multiple recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy which cannot be treated by re-hepatectomy or local ablative therapy, the prognosis is extremely poor. Sorafenib is a molecular-targeted agent which has been demonstrated in two global phase III randomized controlled trials to show survival benefit for advanced HCC. Here, we present a 56-year-old patient with HCC who showed complete clinical response after sorafenib was used for tumor recurrence which developed 3 mo after partial hepatectomy. There was no evidence of progression of disease for 60 mo till now after continuous treatment with sorafenib.     

Targeted and immune therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma:Predictions for 2019 and beyond

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) has markedly advanced since the survival benefit of a molecular targeted agent, sorafenib, were demonstrated in the SHARP and Asia Pacific trials in 2007. Treatment options for patients with advanced HCC increased by sorafenib, and long-term survival for patients with advanced stage HCC has become possible to some extent. However,development of a more potent first-line novel molecular targeted agent replacing sorafenib and a potent second-line agent after disease progression on or intolerant to sorafenib has been warranted because sorafenib lacks tumor shrinking/necrotizing effects and induces relatively severe adverse events such as hand foot skin reaction. Many agents in the 1 st line and 2 nd line setting were attempted to develop between 2007 and 2016, but all of these clinical trials failed.On the other hand, clinical trials of 4 agents(regorafenib, lenvatinib,cabozantinib, and ramucirumab) succeeded in succession in 2017 and 2018, and their use in clinical practice is possible(regorafenib and lenvatinib) or underway(cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Furthermore, all of 5 clinical trials of combination therapy with transcatheter chemoembolization(TACE) plus a molecular targeted agent failed to date, however, the combination of TACE and sorafenib(TACTICS trials) was reported to be successful and presented at ASCO in 2018. Phase 3 clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors and a combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeted agents are also ongoing, which suggests treatment paradigm of HCC in all stages from early,intermediate and advanced stage, is expected to be changed drastically in the very near future.     

Development of Tivantinib as Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rapidly rising cause of liver-related death worldwide. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease, when systemic therapy is the only viable option for treatment. Significant strides have been made in the molecular understanding of HCC development and growth stimulation. The c-Met pathway has been found to be an important pathway in half of all patients with HCC. HCC tumors with high c-Met activation are associated with an aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis. Tivantinib is a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a broad spectrum of anti-tumor effects currently being studied for the treatment of HCC. Phase I and II data are available for tivantinib in the treatment of solid tumors, including HCC. There appears to be an adequate safety profile, with the main side-effect being neutropenia. In HCC patients with elevated c-Met activity, tivantinib results in an improved time to progression of 2.7 months, compared with 1.4 months in placebo-treated patients. Further studies are ongoing, but early data suggest that tivantinib is a therapy that deserves close attention in the coming years for patients with HCC.     

Current status and future prospects of chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib is the only drug that demonstrates a survival benefit for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the therapeutic effect of sorafenib is limited, so development of a more effective treatment method and second-line treatments is needed. Since the advent of sorafenib, clinical studies have been conducted with a variety of drugs and treatment methods, mainly with molecular targeted therapy, but almost all trials have ended in failure. The reasons for the difficulty in the development of a novel drug or treatment method include the diversity of mechanisms in the carcinogenesis and development of HCC, as well as the presence of background liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Trials with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, which have an entirely different anti-tumor mechanism from that of molecular targeted drugs or cytotoxic drugs, have recently begun. Based on the results to date, clinical trials are now being conducted with enriched target subjects. In the future, providing more individualized treatment approaches for patients with advanced HCC will be essential.     

Management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

Systemic chemotherapy has had a disappointing track record in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Single‐agent doxorubicin produces a response rate of 10–15%, but without any survival benefit, and combination chemotherapy has also yielded unimpressive results. With recent advances in the knowledge of hepato‐carcinogenesis, there has been encouraging development in the systemic therapy of advanced HCC patients, and particularly in the targeted therapy of advanced HCC. Among the newly identified targets, exciting results have been shown in targeting the anti‐angiogenic pathway and the Raf/mitogen‐activated protein kinase pathways. Bevacizumab, both as a single agent and in combination with other agents, has shown initial encouraging activity in treating advanced HCC. More recently, single‐agent sorafenib, a putative multitargeted kinase inhibitor, has shown to prolong the overall survival of patients with advanced HCC in the pivotal phase III Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) and Oriental study. Currently, sorafenib is the only approved targeted therapy for patients with advanced HCC. In addition, however, promising early results have been reported for other molecular‐targeted drugs including erlotinib and sunitinib. Future progress seems likely to depend on using controlled clinical trials to optimize synergistic combination treatments.     

Second line systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: Reasons for the failure

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is the main cause of death in patients with cirrhosis, with an increasing incidence worldwide. Sorafenib is the choice therapy for advanced HCC. Over time several randomized phase Ⅲ trials have been performed testing sunitinib, brivanib, linifanib and other molecules in head-tohead comparison with Sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced-stage HCC, but none of these has so far been registered in this setting. Moreover, another feared vacuum arises from the absence of molecules registered as second-line therapy for patients who have failed Sorafenib, representing an urgent unmet medical need. To date all molecules tested as second-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, failed to demonstrate an increased survival compared to placebo. What are the possible reasons for the failure? What we should expect in the near future?     

Signaling pathway and molecular-targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

In recent years, molecular-targeted agents have been used clinically to treat various malignant tumors. In May 2009, sorafenib (Nexavar?) was approved in Japan for 'unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)', and was the first molecular-targeted agent for use in HCC. To date, sorafenib is the only molecular-targeted agent whose survival benefit has been demonstrated in two global phase III randomized controlled trials, and has now been approved worldwide. Phase III clinical trials of other molecular-targeted agents comparing them with sorafenib as first-line treatment agents are now ongoing. Those agents target the vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, as well as target the epidermal growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor receptor and mammalian target of rapamycin, in addition to other molecules targeting other components of the signal transduction pathways. This review outlines the main pathways involved in the development and progression of HCC and the agents that target these pathways. Finally, current status and future perspective will also be discussed.     

Current State of Immunotherapy for HCC—Supporting Data and Toxicity Management

Purpose of Review

After having tyrosine kinase inhibitor as only available one drug class to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for more than a decade, immunotherapy agents are now approved for second-line therapy and are currently being compared head-to-head with sorafenib for first-line treatment. It is becoming increasingly important for hepatologists to become aware of agents in development, potential adverse events, and suggested treatment monitoring.

Recent Findings

Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both shown promising phase II data in the second-line setting for HCC and phase III data in both the first-line and second-line settings are anticipated soon. Durable responses of 15–20% is seen as a potential breakthrough and may translate into improved survival for patients with advanced HCC. While immunotherapies are well tolerated overall, rare but serious immune-mediated adverse events are possible and warrant monitoring to facilitate early treatment when needed. There is ongoing research of combinations with immunotherapy agents and other systemic agents and/or locoregional therapies to further enhance response rates.

Summary

Ongoing studies will define the role of immunotherapy for treatment of HCC, both as single agents as well as in combination with other therapies.

     

Efficacy of iron chelator deferoxamine for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to current treatments

The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poor. For patients with advanced HCC, the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is recommended as the current standard of care. In contrast, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is one of the recommended treatments in Japan. However, in Japan, the use of sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for first-line treatment remains unclear, because there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing HAIC with sorafenib. HAIC can substantially prolong survival in patients with complete and partial response, while non-responders may be suitable candidates for sorafenib therapy. Nonetheless, HAIC non-responders with deteriorated liver function currently have no treatment options. We have shown the efficacy of an alternative therapy, the iron chelator deferoxamine, for advanced HCC patients with deteriorated liver function. Iron chelators may have future therapeutic possibilities in this patient population.     

Sorafenib-based combined molecule targeting in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib is the only and standard systematic chemotherapy drug for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) at the current stage. Although sorafenib showed survival benefits in large randomized phase Ⅲ studies, its clinical benefits remain modest and most often consist of temporary tumor stabilization, indicating that more effective first-line treatment regimens or second-line salvage therapies are required. The molecular pathogenesis of HCC is very complex, involving hyperactivated signal transduction pathways such as RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/m TOR and aberrant expression of molecules such as receptor tyrosine kinases and histone deacetylases. Simultaneous or sequential abrogation of these critical pathways or the functions of these key molecules involved in angiogenesis, proliferation, and apoptosis may yield major improvements in the management of HCC. In this review, we summarize the emerging sorafenib-based combined molecule targeting for HCC treatment and analyze the rationales of these combinations.     

Hepatozelluläres Karzinom

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes one of the most frequent cancers worldwide and in 80-90% develops as a consequence of liver cirrhosis. The prognosis of patients with HCC is not only dependent on the tumor stage, but also on the liver function. Patients with early HCC without extrahepatic metastasis can be successfully treated by liver transplantation, tumor resection or percutaneous tumor ablation (e.g. ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation). Meta-analyses have shown that transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) appears to be an effective treatment for more advanced tumors, at least for a subgroup of patients with good liver function. However, in approximately 50% of HCC patients these treatment options are not applicable or not effective, because they suffer from advanced tumors and/or impaired liver function. Recently a randomized placebo controlled phase III study showed that the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib significantly improves survival of patients with advanced HCC and good liver function (child A). As a consequence of this study sorafenib is now available for effective systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC.     

Molecularly targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: sorafenib as a stepping stone

Since sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), demonstrated survival benefits in recent clinical trials, it has changed the treatment paradigm and become the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. However, disease stabilization with sorafenib lasts a few months, possibly due to the development of resistance, and thus the survival advantage was modest, even in patients with preserved liver function. Furthermore, there is currently no biomarker for monitoring the response or resistance to sorafenib. Currently, various kinds of molecularly targeted agents have been developed and are being evaluated in clinical trials. There are several steps required to improve the outcome from sorafenib therapy. First, a reliable predictive and prognostic biomarker is urgently needed. Second, a compelling indication of sorafenib treatment for HCC needs more clinical studies and consensus. Third, the actual benefits of sorafenib to patients with advanced liver dysfunction should be clarified and a more effective strategy for targeted therapy needs to be developed, for example, using a combination of targeted agents acting on different pathways or different levels of a key pathway. Finally, sorafenib could be used with other treatment modalities, such as local ablation or transarterial chemoembolization, to synergize efficacy. Based on the successful introduction of sorafenib, future studies should focus on plans to further improve the outcome of HCC patients by overcoming resistance and maximizing the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapy.     

Molecular targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: bench to bedside

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, approximately 670,000 new cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in 2005, making it the fifth most common cancer and third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. HCC is a complex and heterogeneous tumor with several genomic alterations. There is evidence of aberrant activation of several signaling cascades such as EGFR, Ras/Raf/MEK, PI3K/mTOR, HGF/MET, Wnt, Hedgehog and apoptotic signaling pathway. Recently a multikinase inhibitor, sorafenib, has shown survival benefits in patients with advanced HCC. It has been proposed that signaling pathway disruption in cancer can be grouped in six function capabilities, some of which need to be altered for cancer development: self-sufficiency in growth signals, insensitivity to anti-growth signals, evading apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis and tumor invasion and metastases. The aim is to integrate these concepts into the molecular pathogenesis of HCC. It has also been proposed that there are common disturbances universal to all liver cancers on top of the more specific mechanisms. Based on this basic research, a molecular targeted agent has recently been developed. There have been no effective chemotherapeutic agents for advanced HCC. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has set a milestone in the management of HCC in that it is the first agent to significantly improve the overall survival in patients with advanced HCC in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study. Clinical trials testing new agents for first- and second-line agents, as well as in combination with existing treatment options such as transarterial chemoembolization or arterial infusion chemotherapy, are ongoing. The results of these trials are therefore eagerly awaited.     

Ten years of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: Are there any predictive and/or prognostic markers?

Sorafenib has been considered the standard of care for patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) since 2007 and numerous studieshave investigated the role of markers involved in the angiogenesis process at both the expression and genetic level and clinical aspect. What results have ten years of research produced? Several clinical and biological markers are associated with prognosis. The most interesting clinical parameters are adverse events, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, and macroscopic vascular invasion, while several single nucleotide polymorphisms and plasma angiopoietin-2 levels represent the most promising biological biomarkers. A recent pooled analysis of two phase III randomized trials showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, etiology and extra-hepatic spread are predictive factors of response to sorafenib, but did not identify any predictive biological markers. After 10 years of research into sorafenib there are still no validated prognostic or predictive factors of response to the drug in HCC. The aim of the present review was to summarize 10 years of research into sorafenib, looking in particular at the potential of associated clinical and biological markers to predict its efficacy in patients with advanced HCC.     

Pharmacogenetics of the systemic treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for the majority of primary liver cancers. To date, most patients with HCC are diagnosed at an advanced tumor stage, excluding them from potentially curative therapies (i.e., resection, liver transplantation, percutaneous ablation). Treatments with palliative intent include chemoembolization and systemic therapy. Among systemic treatments, the small-molecule multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has been the only systemic treatment available for advanced HCC over 10 years. More recently, other smallmolecule multikinase inhibitors (e.g., regorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib) have been approved for HCC treatment. The promising immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab) are still under investigation in Europe while in the US nivolumab has already been approved by FDA in sorafenib refractory or resistant patients. Other molecules, such as the selective CDK4/6inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib, ribociclib), are in earlier stages of clinical development, and the c- MET inhibitor tivantinib did not show positive results in a phase III study. However, even if the introduction of targeted agents has led to great advances in patient response and survival with an acceptable toxicity profile, a remarkable inter-individual heterogeneity in therapy outcome persists and constitutes a significant problem in disease management. Thus, the identification of biomarkers that predict which patients will benefit from a specific intervention could significantly affect decision-making and therapy planning. Germ-line variants have been suggested to play an important role in determining outcomes of HCC systemic therapy in terms of both toxicity and treatment efficacy. Particularly, a number of studies have focused on the role of genetic polymorphisms impacting the drug metabolic pathway and membrane translocation as well as the drug mechanism of action as predictive/prognostic markers of HCC treatment. The aim of this review is to summarize and critically discuss the pharmacogenetic literature evidences, with particular attention to sorafenib and regorafenib, which have been used longer than the others in HCC treatment.     

How to assess the efficacy or failure of targeted therapy:deciding when to stop sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib is thus far the only systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) based on the results of two randomized controlled trials performed in Western and in Eastern countries, despite a poor response rate(from 2% to 3.3%) following conventional evaluation criteria. It is now recognized that the criteria(European Association of the Study of the Liver criteria, modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) based on contrast enhanced techniques(computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) aimed to assess the evolution of the viable part of the tumor(hypervascularized on arterial phase) are of major interest to determine the efficacy of sorafenib and of most antiangiogenic drugs in patients with HCC. The role of alphafetoprotein serum levels remains unclear. In 2016, in accordance with the SHARP and the Asia-Pacific trials, sorafenib must be stopped when tolerance is poor despite dose adaptation or in cases of radiological and symptomatic progression. This approach will be different in cases of available second-line therapy trials. Some recent data(in renal cell carcinoma) revealed that despite progression in patients who received sorafenib, this drug can still decrease tumor progression compared to drug cessation. Then, before deciding to continue sorafenib post-progression or shift to another drug, knowing other parameters of post-progression survival(Child-Pugh class, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, alphafetoprotein, post-progression patterns in particular, the development of extrahepatic metastases and of portal vein thrombosis) will be of major importance.