Isolated antibodies against the core antigen of hepatitis B virus in HIV-infected patients

The aim of this study was to describe the frequency and significance of isolated antibodies against the hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antigen (HBc) in 2185 HIV-infected patients of the Aquitaine Cohort. Antibodies against HBc were found in 372 subjects (17%). Patients with isolated anti-HBc antibodies were more frequently coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (58.2%) than those who were anti-HB surface (HBs) antibody positive (22.9%, P<0.001) and those who were dually reactive anti-HBs/anti-HBc antibody positive (27.3%, P<0.001). These results suggest interactions between HBV and HCV. As observed in patients not infected with HIV, the "anti-HBc-alone" serological profile could reflect essentially late immunity with undetectable anti-HBs antibodies. However, an occult HBV infection cannot be ruled out.     

High prevalence of anti-hepatitis B virus serological markers in patients with hepatitis C virus related chronic liver disease in Japan

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence is accumulating that hepatitis B virus (HBV) is present in patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen negative but have antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) often possess HBV related serological markers. Data on the seroprevalence of HBV infection in patients with HCV related chronic liver disease were collected to evaluate the significance of the presence of antibodies to HBV. METHODS: The prevalence of HBV related serological markers was analysed in a total of 2014 Japanese patients with HCV infection. The control group comprised 352 subjects without liver disorder. RESULTS: A large number of patients (49.9%) with HCV related chronic liver disease including hepatocellular carcinoma were positive for anti-HBc. In addition, the prevalence of anti-HBc closely correlated with the clinical stage of the liver disease. There was no relation between a past history of blood transfusion and the prevalence of anti-HBc. Notably, anti-HBc was the only serological marker for HBV infection in a significant number of patients with HCV related chronic liver disease (24.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide further evidence for the high prevalence of anti-HBc in patients with HCV related chronic liver disease, particularly those with hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting that HBV infection, probably including latent infection, may play an important role in carcinogenesis in these patients.     

Chronic evolution of acute hepatitis B: the significance of simultaneous infections with hepatitis C and D. Copenhagen Hepatitis Acuta Programme

Seventy-six of 77 consecutive patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive acute hepatitis were reevaluated using anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV), anti-hepatitis D virus (HDV), and IgM anti-hepatitis B core (HBc) testing. Anti-HCV and/or anti-HDV was found in 32 patients (42%). The presence of these markers was significantly associated with intravenous drug abuse (p less than 10(-6). Sixty-nine patients were IgM anti-HBc-positive, of whom two (3%) (95% confidence limits, 1-12%) became chronic HBsAg carriers with histologically verified chronic liver disease; both were anti-HCV and anti-HDV-negative. Among the remaining 67 IgM anti-HBc-positive patients 8 had HBV and HDV co-infection, 3 had HBV and HCV co-infection, and 1 had HBV, HCV, and HDV co-infection. Twenty-two had evidence of preceding or past HCV infection; two developed chronic active hepatitis in spite of HBsAg clearance. Seven patients with IgM anti-HBc negative. One was a chronic HBsAg carrier with HDV superinfection. One had subclinical acute HBV infection and became a chronic HBsAg carrier. In a further two patients reactivation of replication in a chronic HBV infection could not be disregarded. Three patients could not be classified; all had acute recent onset of symptoms, cleared HBsAg within 6 months, but lacked IgM anti-HBc. It is concluded that HCV and HDV superinfections in HBV carriers mimicking acute HBV infection with chronic evolution are rarely encountered in the present population in spite of high frequency of both HCV and HDV markers.     

抗—HBs阳性不同血清学模式病毒学及临床意义分析

目的：通过对抗－HBs阳性不同血清学模式病毒学和临床意义的分析,了解抗－HBs阳性不同血清学模式特点,探讨其形成机理及抗－HBs的作用。方法：采用Abbott和PCR定量、PCR定性方法分别检测抗－HBs阳性不同血清学模式病人的HBV血清标志物和HBV DNA。结果：抗－HBs、抗－HBe、抗－HBc阳性组与其它模式组比较,其抗－HBs值显著升高（P＜0．05）;HBsAg、抗－HBs、HBeAg阳性组与其它模式组比较,其HBV DNA含量显著增高（P＜0．01）;定性检测HBV DNA阳性组与HBV DNA阴性组比较抗－HBs值,前者抗－HBs值显著降低（P＜0．05）;抗－HBs阳性不同血清学模式病人生化指标比较无显著性差异（P＞0．05）;抗－HBs阳性不同血清学模式病人比较其肝炎临床类型的构成有非常显著性差异（P＜0．005）：即抗－HBs、抗－HBe、抗－HBc阳性组主要表现为急性肝炎,HBsAg、抗－HBS、HBeAg阳性组与HBsAg、抗－HBs阳性组主要表现为慢性肝炎。结论：抗－HBs阳性时HBV处于复制水平,但并不标志HBV复制的停止,仅预示病人感染相和恢复相的动态消长过程。如抗－HBs水平不断提高,则感染相向稳定的恢复相发展。同时从肝功能损伤的程度及肝炎临床类型分析,提示抗－HBs引发的免疫效应最终使部分病人由感染相进入恢复相。     

Evolution of hepatitis B serological markers in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Evolution of serological markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriage or infection has rarely been investigated among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: During the period 1997-2002, a total of 633 HIV-infected patients were tested for HBV serological markers at baseline, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs ), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (anti-HCV) antibody, HCV RNA level, and HBV DNA level, all of which were retested at least 1 year apart. Medical records were reviewed to identify clinical characteristics associated with evolution of these serological markers. RESULTS: After a median duration of follow-up for 4.96 years, 161 patients (25.4%) had changes in HBV serological markers. Of 119 patients (18.8%) who tested positive for HBsAg at baseline, 6 (5.0%) developed anti-HBs, and 9 (7.6%) developed isolated anti-HBc. Of 270 patients (42.7%) who tested positive for anti-HBs, 18 (6.7%) lost anti-HBs. Of 179 patients (28.3%) in whom isolated anti-HBc had been detected, 73 (40.8%) developed anti-HBs, 18 (10.1%) lost all HBV markers, and 7 (3.9%) developed HBsAg. Of 65 patients (10.2%) who tested negative for all HBV markers, 13 (20%) developed anti-HBs, 13 (20%) developed isolated anti-HBc, and 4 (6.2%) developed HBsAg, indicating a high risk of HBV exposure. Patients in whom anti-HBc was detected at baseline were more likely to have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (P=.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increase in the CD4 cell count after the commencement of HAART was significantly associated with persistence or subsequent development of anti-HBs in patients with anti-HBs or anti-HBc at baseline, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Periodic measurements of HBV serological markers in HIV-infected patients are recommended, because new HBV infections and changes of HBV serological markers are not uncommon in patients with improved immunity after commencement of HAART.     

Analysis of Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With HBs Antigen- and Anti-HCV Antibody-Negative Alcoholic Cirrhosis: Clinical Significance of Prior Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background: The hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) markers frequently are detected in alcoholic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, risk factors for the development of HCC in patients with HBs antigen (Ag)- and anti-HCV antibody (anti-HCV)-negative alcoholic cirrhosis have not been clearly documented. The present study was conducted to elucidate the occurrence rates of HCC in HBs Ag- and anti-HCV-negative male alcoholic cirrhosis and to assess the risk factors for hepatocellular carcinogenesis.
Method: We prospectively studied 91 consecutive patients with HBs Ag- and anti-HCV-negative alcoholic cirrhosis for 0.5 to 12.5 years (median 5.9 years). Potential risk factors assessed for liver carcinogenesis included the following six variables: age, total alcohol intake, association of continuing alcohol intake after diagnosis, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min, anti-HB core antibodies (anti-HBc), and association of diabetes mellitus.
Results: Cumulative occurrence rates of HCC were 6.4%, 18.9%, and 28.7% at the end of the 5th, 7th and 10th years, respectively. When classified by anti-HBc, the occurrence rates of HCC in 31 patients with anti-HBc and 60 patients without anti-HBc were 15.6% and 2.9% at the 5th year, 28.4% and 13.5% at the 7th year, and 40.4% and 22.1% at the 10th year, respectively. The occurrence rates of HCC were also significantly related to the cumulative alcohol intake. Cox proportional hazard model identified that cumulative alcohol intake ( p = 0.0047) and positive anti-HBc antibodies ( p = 0.0598) were independently associated with the occurrence rates of HCC.
Conclusion: These epidemiologic results suggest that heavy cumulative alcohol intake and prior exposure to HBV infection are risk factors for the development of HCC in patients with HBs Ag- and anti-HCV-negative alcoholic cirrhosis.     

The evolution of hepatitis B virus serological patterns and the clinical relevance of isolated antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen in HIV infected patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The evolution of hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological patterns and the clinical relevance of isolated anti-HBc pattern are not well established in HIV infected patients. METHODS: A cohort of 240 patients was followed for 6.9+/-3.4 years, with iterative HBV serologic assays performed (mean interval of 2.2 years). RESULTS: Five patients without HBV markers at baseline subsequently developed positive anti-HBs (incidence 0.66/100 patient-year), as did two patients with chronic HBs antigenemia (incidence 1.66/100 patient-year). Only one patient with isolated anti-HBc pattern developed HBs chronic antigenemia. Persistent isolated anti-HBc pattern was observed in 37 patients (13 with detectable blood HBV DNA) and was strongly associated with positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia (hazard ratio=9.5, confidence interval 95%: 4.5-20.0, P<0.0001). Hepatic lesions were more severe in HCV infected patients with persistent isolated anti-HBc pattern than in those without (Knodell score 9.2+/-4.6 versus 6.7+/-5.0, P=0.04). In time updated analysis, this pattern was not associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity, by contrast with HCV infection or positive HBs antigenemia. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV infected patients, HBV serological status must be systematically and regularly assessed, and systematic HBV vaccination must be proposed in those without HBV marker. Isolated anti-HBc pattern must be considered in the management of hepatitis C, but not for antiretroviral therapy.     

Antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis.

Antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is a sensitive indicator of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, anti-HBc has been found in only a few patients with chronic hepatitis. Therefore, we tested for anti-HBc in 124 sera from 67 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis by the indirect fluorescent antibody technique. All patients, except for one with chronic hepatitis who was seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), had anti-HBc that persisted throughout the follow-up period (three months to three years). Of 33 HBs Ag-seronegative patients, anti-HBc was detected in seven patients and persisted for six months to two years. These findings suggest that in this study 21% of patients with chronic hepatitis with undetectable amounts of HBs Ag in the serum had evidence of recent or continued HBV replication.     

Clinical significance of“anti-HBc alone” in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients

AIM: To determine the prevalence and clinical relevance of isolated antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen as the only marker of infection ("anti-HBc alone") among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type-1 infected patients. Occult hepatitis B infection frequency was also evaluated.METHODS: Three hundred and forty eight histories from 2388 HIV-positive patients were randomly reviewed. Patients with serological markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were classified into three groups: past hepatitis, "anti-HBc alone" and chronic hepatitis. Determination of DNA from HBV, and RNA and genotype from hepatitis C virus (HCV) were performed on "anti-HBc alone" patients.RESULTS: One hundred and eighty seven (53.7%) HIV-positive patients had markers of HBV infection: 118 past infection (63.1%), 14 chronic hepatitis (7.5%) and 55 "anti-HBc alone" (29.4%). Younger age [2.3-fold higher per every 10 years younger; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.33-4.00] and antibodies to HCV infection [odds ratio (OR) 2.87; 95% CI 1.10-7.48] were factors independently associated with the "anti-HBc alone" pattern. No differences in liver disease frequency were detected between both groups.Serum levels of anti-HBs were not associated with HCV infection (nor viral replication or HCV genotype), or with HIV replication or CD4 level. No "anti-HBc alone" patient tested positive for HBV DNA.CONCLUSION: "Anti-HBc alone" prevalence in HIVpositive patients was similar to previously reported data and was associated with a younger age and with antibodies to HCV infection. In clinical practice, HBV DNA determination should be performed only in those patients with clinical or analytical signs of liver injury.     

Factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody in HIV‐positive patients: impact of compromised immunity

Summary. In regions that are hyperendemic for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, prevalence of and risk factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody (anti‐HBc) in HIV‐positive patients are less well described. HIV‐positive patients who were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti‐hepatitis B surface antibody (anti‐HBs) and anti‐HBc at designated hospitals for HIV care in Taiwan were included for analysis. HBV DNA was detected by real‐time polymerase chain reaction in patients with and without isolated anti‐HBc. Of 2351 HIV‐positive patients, 450 (19.1%) were HBsAg positive, 411 (17.5%) were anti‐HBc positive alone and 963 (41.0%) for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc. Compared with patients who were positive for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc, patients with isolated anti‐HBc were older, less likely to have anti‐hepatitis C virus antibody (anti‐HCV), had lower CD4 lymphocyte counts and higher plasma HIV RNA loads. Older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–1.043) and CD4 <100 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.524; 95% confidence interval, 1.025–2.265) were independently associated with isolated anti‐HBc by logistic regression, while presence of anti‐HCV and injecting drug use were not. HBV DNA was detectable in 8.3% of 277 patients with isolated anti‐HBc and 14.3% of 56 patients with both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc (P = 0.160). In a country hyperendemic for HBV infection, HIV‐positive patients at older age and with CD4 <100 cells/μL were more likely to have isolated anti‐HBc, suggesting that compromised immunity plays a role in the presence of this marker.     

Cellular localization of hepatitis B virus antigens in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma coexisting with liver cirrhosis.

Specimens of liver tissue obtained by biopsy from five patients and at necropsy from seven patients with postnecrotic liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were examined for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBc Ag) by direct immunofluorescence. In all cases, samples of serum were tested for HBs Ag and antibody to HBs Ag (anti-HBs) by immunoelectroosmophoresis and for antibody to HBc Ag (anti-HBc) by indirect immunofluorescence. Of these 12 representative cases of the main histological types of hepatocellular carcinoma, six were found to be seropositive for anti-HBc, and three of them were negative for HBs Ag. HBs Ag was detected in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes in the cirrhotic nodules in one seronegative patient and in three of the seropositive cases. In the latter cases, HBs Ag was identified in the cytoplasm of cells in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. HBc Ag was not found in any of the specimens examined.     

Occult hepatitis C virus infection is more common than hepatitis B infection in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Patients of end stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled to study the prevalence of occult and dual hepatitis B virus （HBV） and hepatitis C virus （HCV） infection and non-occult hepatitis B and C virus infection. One hundred and two patients were enrolled. Thirty patients had HCV infection, three of them were positive in anti-HCV. So, 27 （90%） of HCV-positive patients had occult HCV infection. Eleven （11%） patients had HBV infection. Five patients were positive in anti-HBc or HBV-DNA, but negative in HBsAg （occult HBV infection）. Three （3%） patients had dual HBV and HCV infection. None of the patients showed changes in viral markers during the follow-up of 8 mo on average （1-12 mo）.     

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B & C in HIV patients infected through sexual transmission.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) markers including active and occult infection has not been described in diverse cohorts among HIV-infected patients in India. Earlier studies have explained the role of HBV/HCV co-infection in cohorts of injection drug users (IDUs) but the sexual co-transmission of HBV/ HCV is not completely understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of occult HBV & HCV infection in HIV positive sexually acquired transmission risk group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 58 sexually acquired HIV positive patients were taken up for the study of occult HBV/HCV co-infection. Data on demographics, sexual behaviour, sexually transmitted diseases (STD), medical history, laboratory tests viz., serum ALT and CD4 count were recorded. HBV serology included HBsAg, anti HBs, IgG anti HBc and HBV DNA (PCR). HCV serology included anti HCV & HCV RNA (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Occult HBV infection (HBV DNA) was observed in 12.2% (7/58 with HBsAg -ve and IgG anti HBc +ve subjects) while an overall prevalence of HBV DNA was 13.7% (12% occult & 1.7% in HBsAg+ve patients). Out of 58 HIV positive patients 29.3% demonstrated reactivity for any marker of past or current HBV infection. (HBsAg 1.7%, anti HBs 10.3% anti HBc IgG 17.2%). 4/58 (6.8%) revealed anti HCV positivity along with HCV RNA positivity by RT-PCR while 6/58 (10.3%) individuals revealed an occult HCV infection (anti HCV negative). The overall HCV RNA prevalence was 17.2%. 2 out of 58 (3.4%) individuals were positive for occult infection of both HBV DNA & HCV RNA (Triple infection HIV/HBV/ HCV). The HBV/HCV co-infected group (n = 18) showed a significantly high ALT (114.3 + 12.3 U/I) & low CD4 count (202.5 + 33.7 cells/mm3). The percent prevalence of HBV/ HCV co-infection was higher in the illiterate group, in men less than 30 years of age, and in those who were married and exhibited polygamous activity. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that in HIV infected patients testing only serological viral markers like HBsAg, antiHBcIgG & anti HCV, fails to identify the true prevalence of co-infection with HBV & HCV. Qualitative PCR for HBV DNA & HCV RNA detects co-infection in patients who are negative for serological markers. Also, in subjects who had only a sexual risk factor for parenterally transmitted infections, HIV may enhance the sexual transmission of HBV and HCV.     

Markers for hepatitis A, B and C in methadone maintained patients: an unexpectedly high co-infection with silent hepatitis B

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of hepatitis A, B and C viruses in patients attending a methadone maintenance clinic in New York City. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: The Adult Services Clinic of Weill Cornell Medical College, an urban hospital-affiliated methadone program. PARTICIPANTS: Former heroin addicted adults (n = 103) on methadone maintenance therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Markers for hepatitis A virus [HAV immunoglobulin M (IgM) and imunoglobulin G (IgG)], hepatitis B [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)] and hepatitis C virus (HCVAb). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and quantitative HCV RNA were also obtained. Qualitative detection of HBV DNA and HCV genotype were obtained in a subset of subjects. FINDINGS: More than 40% of subjects had markers for all three viruses. HCVAb was the most prevalent (83.5%), followed by HBcAb (65.0%), HAV IgG (46.1%) and HBsAb (41.1%). Hepatitis C RNA was detected in 70.6% of HCVAb positive subjects. While no subject had HBsAg, HBV DNA was detected in 26.4% of subjects who underwent this measure; all (n = 20) had HBcAb as their only HBV marker. The presence of HBV DNA did not influence ALT. Subjects with HCV RNA had higher ALTs than those without HCV RNA. CONCLUSIONS: Most methadone-maintained subjects had at least one marker for viral hepatitis, with 41.8% having markers for HAV, HBV and HCV. A quarter of subjects had silent HBV infection, defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg. These subjects should be considered infectious and pose a public health risk.     

A seroepidemiological survey of the effect of hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B and C virus infections among elementary school students in Siem Reap province,Cambodia

Aim

This study aimed to survey the prevalence and incidence of hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among elementary school students in Siem Reap province, Cambodia and to evaluate the effects of a national infant HBV vaccination program introduced in 2001.

Methods

Students in 3rd grade during the 2011, 2012, and 2013 academic years were enrolled in this study; at the time of the second examination, in the 2014–2015 academic year, the students were in 5th or 6th grade. The incidence and prevalence rates of HBV and HCV infection were estimated and full HBV sequences were analyzed.

Results

Among 248 students (107 male and 141 female) born between 1999 and 2005, five students were HBV surface antigen (HBs‐Ag) positive (2.02%), and all of them were infected with genotype C. Among them, subgenotype C1 was found in four students and, unexpectedly, complete genetic sequence identity of subgenotype C1 was found in two students from different families. The anti‐HBV core (HBc) and anti‐HBs prevalence rates were 10.89% and 16.13%, respectively. Twenty‐five students were positive for anti‐HBs and negative for both HBsAg and anti‐HBc (10.08%; estimated serological vaccination rate); this rate increased significantly with the birth year (P = 0.0229). Prevalence of anti‐HCV was 2.82%, and HCV RNA was not detected. The estimated incidence of HBV and HCV infection were both 0/1000 person‐years (PY) (95% confidence interval, 0–20.61/1000 PY and 0–14.50/1000 PY, respectively).

Conclusion

Hepatitis B virus full‐genome sequencing and serological analysis revealed the possibility of horizontal transmission of HBV among Cambodian schoolchildren. However, the anti‐HBc positivity rate decreased along with increasing age and estimated serological vaccination rates.     

Previous hepatitis B virus infection is associated with worse disease stage and occult hepatitis B virus infection has low prevalence and pathogenicity in hepatitis C virus‐positive patients

Abstract: Background: Anti‐hepatitis C virus (anti‐HCV) patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) frequently show markers of previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Moreover, they may carry occult HBV infection. These features might influence clinical and biochemical features as well as stage of disease. Aim: To assess the prevalence and clinical associations of previous (positivity for anti‐HBs and/or anti‐HBc antibodies) and occult HBV infection (positivity for HBV‐DNA by nested‐PCR) in the serum of anti‐HCV‐positive, HCV‐RNA‐positive, HBsAg‐negative patients with various degrees of CLD seen at a tertiary referral centre. Patients: A total of 119 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (84 chronic hepatitis and 35 liver cirrhosis). Results: Forty‐eight patients (40.3%) showed markers of previous HBV infection. This feature was more frequent (P = 0.02) among cirrhotics (57%) as compared to chronic hepatitis patients (33%). Chronic hepatitis patients positive for markers of previous HBV infection had worse histology as compared to negative ones (grading: 6.4 ± 2.7 versus 4.6 ± 3.0, P = 0.004; staging: 1.6 ± 1.2 versus 1.0 ± 1.0, P = 0.01). Eight patients were positive for HBV‐DNA in serum (6.7%). No difference in the presence of occult HBV infection was seen between various degrees of liver disease (7.1% of chronic hepatitis, 5.7% of cirrhosis) and among patients who were positive (10.4%) or negative (4.2%) for markers of previous HBV infection. No significant biochemical, virological, or histological difference was observed between age, age at infection, duration of infection, marker patterns of previous HBV infection‐matched HBV‐DNA‐positive and negative chronic hepatitis patients. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that previous HBV infection among anti‐HCV patients is associated with worse disease stage. In these patients, the prevalence of occult HBV infection is low and there is no difference in distribution among patients with or without markers of previous HBV infection. Furthermore, it does not seem to be associated with disease stage. Lastly, at least among patients with chronic hepatitis, it does not seem to affect the severity of disease.     

Hepatitis B or C viral infection and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies

AIM: To investigate if there is an association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and the risk of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: All relevant studies published before 11 October, 2012 were identified by a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews and the Cochrane Library databases and with cross-referencing. The observational studies that reported RR or OR estimates with 95%CIs for the association between HBV or HCV and pancreatic cancer were included. A random-effects model was used to summarize meta-analytic estimates. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was applied to assess the quality of the methodology in the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 8 eligible studies were selected for meta-analysis. Overall, chronic hepatitis B and inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carrier state (HBsAg positive) had a significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer with OR of 1.20 (95%CI: 1.01-1.39), especially in the Chinese population (OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.05-1.56). Past exposure to HBV (possible occult HBV infection) had an increased OR of pancreatic cancer risk (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.05-1.42), especially among those patients without natural immunity [anti hepatitis B core (HBc) positive/hepatitis B surface antibody (anti HBs) negative], with OR of 1.67 (95%CI: 1.13-2.22). However, past exposure to HBV with natural immunity (anti-HBc positive/anti-HBs positive) had no association with pancreatic cancer development, with OR 0.98 (95%CI: 0.80-1.16), nor did the HBV active replication (hepatitis B e antigen positive status), with OR 0.98 (95%CI: 0.27-1.68). The risk of pancreatic cancer among anti-HBs positive patients was significantly lower than among anti-HBs negative patients (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.46-0.62). Past exposure to HCV also resulted in an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.03-1.50). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed. Evidence of publication bias for HBV/HCV infection-pancreatic cancer association was not found.     

Hepatitis B and C viral infections in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections was studied in 70 patients diagnosed as having hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition to viral serological markers, serum hepatitis B virus DNA and hepatitis C virus RNA were determined with a nested polymerase chain reaction assay. Twelve patients (17%) were HBsAg positive, 26 (37%) had antibodies to HBs, HBc or both and 32 (46%) were negative for all hepatitis B virus serological markers. Prevalence of the antibody to hepatitis C virus was 63% (44 patients). Hepatitis B virus DNA was detected in 24 of the 66 tested patients (36%). Twelve of these hepatitis B virus DNA-positive patients were HBsAg negative (seven were positive for antibody to HBs, antibody to HBc or both and five were negative for all hepatitis B virus serological markers). Hepatitis C virus RNA was found in 42 of 68 patients (62%). A high correlation (95%) existed between hepatitis C virus RNA and hepatitis C virus antibodies. Nevertheless, two patients without antibody to hepatitis C virus had serum hepatitis C virus RNA sequences. Coinfection by the two viruses was detected in nine subjects (14%), but no clinical differences were found between these and the rest of the patients. We conclude that nearly 90% (62 of the 70 patients studied) of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma in our geographical area are related to hepatitis virus infections (detected by serological or molecular studies). Hepatitis C is more prevalent than hepatitis B virus in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and the infection is still active when the tumor is diagnosed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Role of hepatitis B virus infection in chronic glomerulonephritis

This study included 60 patients suffering from chronic glomerulonephritis (GN), confirmed by punch biopsy of the kidney. HBs antigen (Ag) was found in the sera of 5 patients, whereas anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc antibodies were found in 3 others. Of the 139 subjects carrying HBsAg or anti-HBc antibodies 117 suffered from chronic liver disease and 3 from chronic GN. Of the 11 patients afflicted with chronic GN and one with a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection 9 had GN with IgA deposits and the other 2 had membranoproliferative GN. The renal tissue of these 11 patients was examined for the presence of HBs. HBc and HBe antigens using monoclonal antibodies. Virus particles were unsuccessfully sought by electron microscopy. It is possible that, in some patients infected with HBV and afflicted with chronic liver disease, the IgA deposits in the glomeruli result from the perturbed liver metabolism.     

HBV reactivation in patients with HCV/HBV cirrhosis on treatment with direct‐acting antivirals

Anecdotal reports suggest that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis and overt or occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection may reactivate HBV when HCV is suppressed or cleared by direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs). We assessed the prevalence of overt or previous HBV coinfection and the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV cirrhosis treated with DAAs. This was a retrospective cohort of 104 consecutive patients with HCV cirrhosis treated with DAAs. Serum HCV‐RNA and HBV‐DNA were tested at weeks 4, 8 and 12 of DAAs therapy and at week 12 of follow‐up. At the start of DAAs, eight patients (7.7%) were HBsAg positive/HBeAg negative with undetectable HBV‐DNA and low levels of quantitative HBsAg (four on nucleos(t)ide analogues [NUCs] and four inactive carriers), 37 patients (35.6%) had markers of previous HBV infection (25 anti‐HBc positive, 12 anti‐HBc/anti‐HBs positive) and 59 (56.7%) had no evidence of HBV infection. Sixty‐seven patients (64.4%) were HCV‐RNA negative at week 4 and 98 (94.2%) achieved sustained virological response. All four HBsAg‐positive patients treated with NUCs remained HBV‐DNA negative, but three of four untreated patients showed an increase in HBV‐DNA of 2‐3 log without a biochemical flare and achieved HBV‐DNA suppression when given NUCs. During or after DAAs, by conventional assay, HBV‐DNA remained not detectable in all 37 anti‐HBc‐positive patients but in three of them (8.1%) HBV‐DNA became detectable with a highly sensitive PCR. HBV reactivation is likely to occur in untreated HBV/HCV‐coinfected cirrhotic patients when they undergo HCV treatment with DAAs. Pre‐emptive therapy with NUCs should be considered in this setting. Anti‐HBc‐positive patients rarely reactivate HBV without clinical or virological outcomes.