Dynamic Indicators That Impact the Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection

PurposeTo investigate dynamic variables obtained from retrospective computed tomography angiography for ability to predict thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD).Materials and MethodsSeventy-nine patients with cTBAD who received TEVAR from March 2009 to June 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. Relative true lumen area (r-TLA) was computed at the level of tracheal bifurcation every 5% of all R-R intervals. Parameters that reflect the state of intimal motion were evaluated, including difference between maximum and minimum r-TLA (D-TLA) and true lumen collapse. The endpoints comprised early (≤ 30 days) and late (> 30 days) outcomes after intervention.ResultsOverall early mortality rate was 13.9% (11/79), and early adverse events rate was 24.1% (19/79). Patients who received TEVAR within 2 days of symptom onset demonstrated the worst outcomes. A longer time of r-TLA < 25% in 1 cardiac cycle (P = .049) and larger D-TLA (P < .001) were correlated to an increased early death. In addition, D-TLA was an independent predictor of early mortality. Area under the curve of D-TLA was 0.849 (95% confidence interval 0.730–0.967) for predicting early mortality and 0.742 (95% CI 0.611–0.873) for predicting early adverse events. Survival and event-free survival rates during follow-up were decreased in the D-TLA > 21.5% group compared with the D-TLA ≤ 21.5% group (all P < .001).ConclusionsLarger D-TLA is correlated with worse postoperative outcomes and might be a crucial parameter for future risk stratification in patients with cTBAD.     

“Cheese Wire” Fenestration of Dissection Intimal Flap to Facilitate Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Chronic Dissection

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysmal chronic dissection is often complicated by retrograde filling of the false lumen and dissected distal landing zone. A “cheese wire”-style fenestration of the dissection intimal flap can create a landing zone facilitating TEVAR. This technique successfully aided TEVAR in 3 patients with an average age of 57.3 years. Complications included type III endoleak requiring relining and renal artery occlusion requiring stent placement. Average duration of clinical follow-up was 19 ± 4 months. Imaging follow-up was 8 ± 10 months. All patients have survived for more than 1 year without aneurysm enlargement.     

In Situ Laser Stent Graft Fenestration of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with Limited Proximal Landing Zones: 5-Year Outcomes

PurposeTo assess safety and feasibility of in situ laser stent graft fenestration to revascularize the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with limited proximal landing zones with 5 years of follow-up.Materials and MethodsIn a single-center retrospective study, 130 patients with TBAD with limited proximal landing zones (≤ 1.5 cm) underwent in situ laser stent graft fenestration revascularizing the LSA during TEVAR from April 2014 to April 2019. Outcomes were assessed by CT angiography and clinic visits, including technical success rate, operative time, LSA patency, ischemic events, and late aorta-related complications during follow-up.ResultsMean age of patients was 53 y (range, 33–73 y). Primary technical success rate was 96.9% (126/130). Three chimney stents were placed instead of fenestration, and 1 LSA fenestration was combined with a left common carotid artery (LCCA) chimney stent. Mean operative time was 53 min ± 28 with fluoroscopy time of 40 min ± 15. There were no neurologic complications and no deaths, with a mean duration of hospital stay of 9 d (range, 5–21 d). At a mean follow-up of 42 mo (range, 5–60 mo), there was a 97% primary LSA patency. Four patients had a type I endoleak, which disappeared during follow-up. One LCCA became occluded after 6 months. No type II or III endoleaks were found. Retrograde type A aortic dissection and stent graft–induced new distal entry were not found during follow-up.ConclusionsIn situ laser fenestration to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing zones was efficient, safe, and feasible based on 5-year follow-up.     

Comparative Outcome Analysis of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization of the False Lumen Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Aortic Dissection

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41–68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37–70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention–free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR.ConclusionsNBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.     

Percutaneous In Situ Microneedle Puncture Fenestration via the Left Subclavian Artery for branched Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

This study explored the feasibility of a totally percutaneous approach to perform in situ microneedle puncture fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) via access from the left subclavian artery (LSA). In total, 23 patients with either thoracic aortic dissection or thoracic aortic aneurysm were treated with in situ LSA fenestration during TEVAR. The procedure was technically successful in all the patients. No serious complications occurred during a mean 9-month follow-up period. In situ microneedle puncture fenestration during TEVAR via the LSA is a feasible and effective method for LSA reconstruction.     

Risk Factors for Access-Related Adverse Events Related to the Preclose Technique in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

PurposeTo analyze the risk factors for access-related adverse events (AEs) of the preclose technique in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).Materials and MethodsNinety-one patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection who underwent the preclose technique in TEVAR between January 2013 and December 2021 were included. According to the occurrence of access-related AEs, the patients were divided into 2 groups: those with AE and those without AE. Age, sex, combined diseases, body mass index, skin depth, femoral artery diameter, access calcification, iliofemoral artery tortuosity, and sheath size were recorded for risk factor analysis. The sheath–to–femoral artery ratio (SFAR), the ratio of the femoral artery inner diameter (in millimeters) to the sheath’s outer diameter (in millimeters), was also included in the analysis.ResultsSFAR was identified as an independent risk factor for AEs using multivariable logistic analysis (odds ratio, 251.748; 95% CI, 7.004–9,048.534; P = .002). The cutoff value of SFAR was 0.85 and was related to a higher incidence of access-related AEs (5.2% vs 33.3%, P = .001), especially to a higher stenosis rate (0.0% vs 21.2%, P = .001).ConclusionsSFAR is an independent risk factor for access-related AEs of preclose in TEVAR with a cutoff value of 0.85. SFAR could be a new criterion for preoperative access evaluation in high-risk patients that may allow the detection and treatment of access-related AEs at the early stage.     

Endovascular Outcomes in Aortic Arch Repair with Double and Triple Parallel Stent Grafts

PurposeTo report early and midterm outcomes of treating thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and aortic dissection (AD) involving zone 1 and zone 0 with multiple parallel stent grafts (PSGs).Materials and MethodsFrom February 2011 to August 2018, 31 of 1,806 patients (1.7%) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with double PSGs (DPSGs) (n = 20) or triple PSGs (TPSGs) (n = 11) were retrospectively reviewed. Procedures were performed in high-risk patients who had TAA or AD involving zone 1 or zone 0.ResultsFifteen patients (48.4%) who presented with symptomatic or impending rupture underwent urgent or emergent TEVAR with DPSGs or TPSGs. Nineteen patients (61.3%) were treated for zone 0 disease. Technical and clinical success rates were 70.0% for DPSG cohort and 45.5% for TPSG cohort. Intraoperative type Ia endoleak was observed in 30% of DPSG cohort and 45.5% of TPSG cohort. One patient in the DPSG cohort died of aortic sinus rupture intraoperatively. Minor stroke during the 30-day postoperative period was more frequent in the TPSG cohort (P = .042). Mean duration of follow-up was 28.9 months ± 17.7. The TPSG cohort had a higher incidence of major adverse events (72.7% vs 25.0%, P = .021). The most common adverse events were endoleaks (12.9%), endograft migration (9.7%), PSG stenosis or occlusion (6.5%), retrograde dissection (6.5%), and stroke (3.2%). Endograft migrations were more common in TPSG cohort (27.3%, P = .037). Overall mortality rate was 16.1% (5/31) perioperatively and during follow-up. There were no statistical differences in overall survival and reintervention-free survival.ConclusionsIn the context of TEVAR with multiple PSGs for aortic arch repair, TPSGs may have a high risk of major complications.     

Radiation-Free Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Fiberoptic and Electromagnetic Guidance: A Phantom Study

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a radiation-free implantation of a thoracic aortic stent graft employing fiberoptic and electromagnetic tracking in an anthropomorphic phantom.Materials and MethodsAn anthropomorphic phantom was manufactured based on computed tomography (CT) angiography data from a patient. An aortic stent graft application system was equipped with a fiber Bragg gratings and 3 electromagnetic sensors. The stent graft was navigated in the phantom by 3 interventionalists using the tracking data generated by both technologies. One implantation procedure was performed. The technical success of the procedure was evaluated using digital subtraction angiography and CT angiography (before and after the intervention). Tracking accuracy was determined at various anatomical landmarks based on separately acquired fluoroscopic images. The mean/maximum errors were measured for the stent graft application system and the tip/end of the stent graft.ResultsThe procedure resulted in technical success with a mean error below 3 mm for the entire application system and <2 mm for the position of the tip of the stent graft. Navigation/implantation and handling of the device were rated sufficiently accurate and on par with comparable, routinely used stent graft application systems.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates successful stent graft implantation during a thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure employing advanced guidance techniques and avoiding fluoroscopic imaging. This is an essential step in facilitating the implantation of stent grafts and reducing the health risks associated with ionizing radiation during endovascular procedures.     

Outpatient Percutaneous Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Single-Center Experience

PurposeTo evaluate the safety of outpatient percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic repair (PEVAR) versus inpatient PEVAR without or with adjunct procedures.Materials and MethodsBetween January 2012 and June 2019, a cohort of 359 patients comprising 168 (46.8%) outpatients and 191 (53.2%) inpatients who had undergone PEVAR were enrolled. All the patients were asymptomatic but had indications for endovascular aortic repair, ie, fit for intravenous anesthesia and anatomically feasible with standard devices. Patient sex, age, comorbidities, smoking status, type of anesthesia, adjunct procedures, type of graft device, operative times, mortality, complications, and readmissions were analyzed.ResultsMedian follow-up period was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 9–31 months). Except for a higher percentage of tobacco use (42.6% vs 28.8%; P = .04), dyslipidemia (39.7% vs 19.2%; P < .01), and use of local anesthesia (99.4% vs 82.2%; P < .01) in the outpatients, there was no significant difference in the type of graft and adjunct procedures used. No outpatient mortality occurred. There was no difference in the number, severity, and onset of complications (all P > .05). Outpatient unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were 4.8%, 2.4% (P = .13), and 10% (P < .01), respectively. Operative times for outpatient PEVAR without adjunct procedures were shorter (P < .01).ConclusionsOutpatient PEVAR can be performed with a safety profile similar to that of inpatient PEVAR. The unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were low. The outpatient PEVARs without adjunct procedures took less time.     

Computed Tomography Angiography Prediction of Successful Trasnscatheter Embolization for Type II Endoleak of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) angiography before transarterial embolization (TAE) in predicting TAE’s technical success for type II endoleaks (T2ELs).Materials and MethodsFifty-eight patients (mean age, 74.4 years; range, 46–89 years) who underwent attempted TAE for T2EL from July 2014 to August 2019 and underwent CT angiography before the procedure were included. Each CT angiography result was assessed for a feeding artery that was traceable over its entire course from either the superior mesenteric artery or the internal iliac artery to the endoleak cavity. TAE was performed using coils and was considered technically successful if embolization of the endoleak cavity and feeding artery was performed. The technical success rates were compared between patients with and without traceable feeding arteries.ResultsA fully traceable feeding artery supplying 75% (44/59) of endoleaks in the cohort was identified. TAE was technically successful in 95% (42/44) of these cases but only in 13% (2/15) of the cases without a fully traceable feeding artery (P < .001). When the inferior mesenteric artery was the feeding artery, it was always fully traceable, and TAE was technically successful in 100% (33/33) of the cases. When a lumbar artery was the feeding artery, it was fully traceable in only 42% (11/26) of the cases. When the lumbar artery was not fully traceable, TAE was technically successful in only 13% (2/15) of the cases.ConclusionsThe traceability of a feeding artery over its entire course to an endoleak cavity using CT angiography was associated with TAE’s technical success. Lumbar feeding arteries were less likely to be fully traceable. TAE’s high failure rate when the feeding artery was not fully traceable suggests that translumbar embolization can be considered as an initial approach for theses patients.     

False Lumen Stent-Grafts for Repair of Postdissection Aortic Aneurysms

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of false lumen (FL) stent-grafts in the treatment of postdissection aortic aneurysms.Materials and MethodsEleven patients who underwent endovascular repair using FL stent-grafts from January 2016 to June 2019 were included. Among them, 2 patients had a prior history of type A aortic dissection, whereas 9 had undergone a prior endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection. Computed tomography angiography was performed to evaluate the reintervention and technical success rate, aortic remodeling, and other related aortic complications.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 55.6 ± 10.4 years. Technical success was achieved in all patients, and neither early mortality nor paralysis occurred. In total, 8 visceral branch arteries originating from the FL were reconstructed. The true lumen areas at the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, renal artery, and abdominal aortic bifurcation were significantly increased from 230.1 mm² to 312.3 mm², 212.1 mm² to 277.5 mm², 209.1 mm² to 291.6 mm², and 214.4 mm² to 300.6 mm², respectively (P < .05). The total diameter of the aorta at the 4 designated levels was stable or had shrunk in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 7.6 months, 1 patient received re-intervention owing to iliac stent-graft occlusion. No aortic-related mortality occurred.ConclusionsFL stent-grafts can safely and effectively treat patients with postdissection aortic aneurysms. This strategy can be used to promote thrombosis of the FL and aortic remodeling. A larger sample and an extended follow-up period are needed to produce more conclusive results.     

Endovascular Exclusion of Concomitant Aortic Ruptures at the Proximal and Distal Anchoring Zones of a Previous Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

1. Download : Download high-res image (172KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Outcomes of Preventive Embolization of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR).Materials and MethodsFrom January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (F-EVAR) for asymptomatic AAA in a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. Three groups of patients were defined: patients with a patent IMA who underwent embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 1), those with a patent IMA who did not undergo embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 2), and those with a chronically occluded IMA (group 3). Preoperative aortic morphology, demographics, and procedural details were recorded. Aneurysmal growth (≥5 mm), reintervention, and overall mortality rates were analyzed using multivariate proportional hazard multivariate modeling. Propensity scores were constructed, and inverse probability weighting was applied to a new set of multivariate analyses to perform a sensitivity analysis.ResultsA total of 266 patients (male, 95% [n = 249]) with a median age of 70 (65–77) years were included, with F-EVAR procedures comprising 87 (32.7%) of the interventions. There were 52, 142, and 72 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Changes in aneurysmal sac size did not differ between groups, nor did overall survival or reintervention rates at 24 months. IMA embolization was not identified as an independently protective factor for aneurysmal growth during follow-up (relative risk [RR] = 2.82/mm [0.96–8.28], P = .060), whereas accessory renal arteries (RR = 5.07/mm [1.72–14.96], P = .003) and a larger preoperative aneurysmal diameter (RR = 1.09/mm [1.03–1.15], P = .004) were independent risk factors for sac enlargement.ConclusionsPreventive embolization of the IMA during EVAR or F-EVAR did not promote aneurysmal sac shrinking or decrease the reintervention rate at 2-year follow-up.     

Response Findings after Treatment and Outcomes on CT after Endovascular Repair of Mycotic Aortic Aneurysm

PurposeTo demonstrate post-treatment computed tomography (CT) findings and outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA).Materials and MethodsClinical data of patients with MAA who underwent EVAR from June 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 22 patients were included (19 men and 3 women). The periaortic features of the MAA regression after EVAR were graded and evaluated by follow-up CT.ResultsThe median follow-up was 36.5 months (range, 0.5–97 months.). The cumulative survival rate at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.6%, and 73.4%, respectively. The early and late infection-related complication (IRC) rate was 18.2% and 13.6%, respectively. One patient died within 1 month from severe acidosis and shock. Of the other patients, the median time to stable response of the MAA was 6 months (range, 3–36 months). Fourteen patients (66.7%) showed early response of the MAA, while 7 patients (33.3%) showed delayed response. A significant association was observed between delayed response and late IRCs (P = .026).ConclusionsThe post-EVAR periaortic features on follow-up CT aid in monitoring the treatment response of the MAA. Early response of the MAA was associated with a low rate of late IRCs and might aid in adjusting the antibiotic duration after the patient has achieved complete or nearly complete regression of the MAA.     

Lymphatic Interventional Treatment for Chyluria via Retrograde Thoracic Duct Access

Chyluria is the leakage of intestinal lymph (chyle) into the urine. Novel lymphatic intervention techniques, such as interstitial lymphatic embolization, proved to be a useful treatment option for chyluria. However, one of the challenges of this approach is the difficulty in identifying connections between the lymphatic system and kidney collecting system. Here, embolization of the abnormal lymphatic connection through retrograde thoracic duct access in 3 chyluria patients is introduced.     

Thoracic Duct Embolization Using Transabdominal Antegrade and Transcervical Retrograde Accesses

PurposeTo evaluate the technical success and clinical outcomes of thoracic duct embolization (TDE) using transabdominal antegrade and transcervical retrograde accesses to treat patients with chyle leak.Materials and MethodsThis study was a retrospective, nonblinded, single-institution chart review of all patients aged 18 years or older over a 6-year time frame who underwent lymphangiography with attempted TDE for iatrogenic or spontaneous chyle leaks using transabdominal antegrade and/or transcervical retrograde accesses.ResultsNinety-nine patients underwent 113 procedures. Eighty-five patients underwent 1 procedure, and 14 patients required 2 procedures. The technical success rate of TDE was 68% (72/106) with transabdominal antegrade access and 44% (15/34) with transcervical retrograde access. The overall technical success rate of TDE, including both the access methods, was 77% (87/113). The most common reasons for transabdominal access failure were small caliber of the cisterna chyli and thoracic duct (TD) occlusion. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Overall clinical success, defined as resolution of the chyle leak, was achieved in 83% (78/94) of the patients. There were 6 Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) level 1 adverse events (AEs), 5 SIR level 2 AEs, and 2 SIR level 3 AEs. Nontarget embolization occurred in 2 patients.ConclusionsAlthough transcervical retrograde TDE is a challenging procedure, with a lower technical success rate than transabdominal antegrade access, retrograde access improved the technical and clinical success rates of the treatment of chyle leaks in cases of thoracic duct occlusion, small cisterna chyli, and leaks located in the abdomen.     

Effects of Antithrombotic Therapy on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Size after Endovascular Repair in Patients with Favorable Neck Anatomy

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy on sac behavior after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).Materials and MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed data from patients with favorable neck anatomy who underwent EVAR between 2007 and 2019. Patients with ruptured AAA and ≤1 year of sac behavior evaluation were excluded. Sac shrinkage after 1 year, persistent type II endoleak, and late sac expansion were examined.ResultsIn total, 182 patients with favorable neck anatomy were included in this study. A multivariable analysis identified an occluded inferior mesenteric artery (IMA; P = .049), the presence of a posterior thrombus (P = .009), and no antiplatelet therapy (P = .012) as factors positively associated with sac shrinkage at 1 year. Persistent type II endoleak was detected in 56 (30.8%) patients, with patent IMA (P = .006), the lack of a posterior thrombus (P = .004), the number of patent lumbar arteries (P = .004), and antiplatelet therapy (P = .039) being identified as significant risk factors. The multivariable analysis identified a larger initial AAA diameter (P < .001), the lack of a posterior thrombus (P = .038), and antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies (P = .038 and P = .003, respectively) as risk factors for late sac expansion.ConclusionsAfter EVAR in patients with favorable neck anatomy, antiplatelet therapy is associated with the lack of sac regression at 1 year, whereas antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies are risk factors for late sac expansion.     

Factors Contributing to Successful Transvenous Retrograde Thoracic Duct Cannulation

PurposeTo identify key factors for successful transvenous retrograde cannulation (TVRC) of the thoracic duct.Materials and MethodsA total of 47 consecutive patients (62.1 ± 13.2 years; 32 men) who underwent attempted TVRC between July 2016 and July 2021 were included. Reasons for interventions were chylous leakage from the chest (n = 36), abdomen (n = 6), and other sites (n = 5). Patient age, sex, access vein (femoral vs brachial), anatomic classification (presence of dominant channel vs plexiform) of the terminal thoracic duct, and engagement of a diagnostic catheter into the jugulovenous junction were included in the analyses. Anatomic details were evaluated according to catheter-based high-pressure lymphangiography and conventional intranodal lymphangiography. The Firth bias-reduced penalized-likelihood logistic regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.ResultsTVRC was successful in 33 of the 47 patients (70%). In univariate analysis, femoral access, diagnostic catheter engagement, and presence of dominant channel were significant positive prognostic factors (P <.05). In multivariate analysis, diagnostic catheter engagement and presence of dominant channel were significant prognostic factors (P <.05). Diagnostic catheter engagement showed the highest prognostic performance (accuracy = 0.872), followed by presence of a dominant channel. High-pressure catheter-based lymphangiographic findings showed better performance (accuracy, 0.844 vs 0.727) than intranodal lymphangiography to delineate the anatomy of the terminal thoracic duct.ConclusionsA secure selection of the jugulovenous junction and the presence of a dominant channel in the terminal portion of the thoracic duct were significant prognostic factors for successful TVRC.     

Endovascular Lymphatic Decompression via Thoracic Duct Stent Placement for Refractory Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the technical and clinical success of endovascular lymphatic decompression via thoracic duct (TD) stent placement in patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.Materials and MethodsNine patients (6 men and 3 women; median age, 66 [interquartile range {IQR}, 65–68] years; range, 62–78 years) who underwent TD stent placement for refractory ascites with contraindications for liver transplantation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation were included in this retrospective study. TD stent placement was performed under local anesthesia using retrograde access from the venous system. Self-expanding stents from 5 to 8 mm in diameter were used and extended into the subclavian vein by approximately 1 cm. Technical (correct positioning of the stent) and clinical success (no more requirement of paracentesis) were evaluated. In addition, the safety of the procedure and TD pressure evolution were evaluated.ResultsThe technical success rate was 100%, and 3 (33%) patients reported clinical success. Five (56%) patients reported 7 minor adverse events (Grade I), among which 2 TD perforations were induced by stent angioplasty, with no clinical manifestation or treatment required. The median TD pressure decreased from 19 mm Hg (IQR, 11–24 mm Hg) at the beginning of the procedure to 6 mm Hg (IQR, 5–11 mm Hg) after TD stent placement. The median survival time after the procedure was 7.1 months.ConclusionsEndovascular lymphatic decompression via TD stent placement is feasible and safe and was effective on ascites in some patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.