Quality of Care and Outcomes for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background and PurposeHospitalizations for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the quality of care and outcomes for patients with AIS/TIA before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic across the United States Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study compared AIS/TIA care quality before (March–September 2019) vs. during (March-September 2020) the pandemic. Electronic health record data were used to identify patient characteristics, quality of care and outcomes. The without-fail rate was a composite measure summarizing whether an individual patient received all of the seven processes for which they were eligible. Mixed effects logistic regression modeling was used to assess differences between the two periods.ResultsA decrease in presentations occurred during the pandemic (N = 4360 vs. N = 5636 patients; p = 0.003) and was greater for patients with TIA (-30.4%) than for AIS (-18.7%). The without-fail rate improved during the pandemic (56.2 vs. before 50.1%). The use of high/moderate potency statins increased among AIS patients (OR 1.26 [1.06–1.48]) and remained unchanged among those with TIA (OR 1.04 [0.83,1.29]). Blood pressure measurement within 90-days of discharge was less frequent during the pandemic (57.8 vs. 89.2%, p < 0.001). Hypertension control decreased among patients with AIS (OR 0.73 [0.60–0.90]) and TIA (OR 0.72 [0.54-0.96]). The average systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 1.9/1.4 mmHg higher during the pandemic than before (p < 0.001). Compared to before, during the pandemic fewer AIS patients had a primary care visit (52.5% vs. 79.8%; p = 0.0001) or a neurology visit (27.9 vs. 41.1%; p = 0.085). Both 30- and 90-day unadjusted all-cause mortality rates were higher in 2020 (3.6% and 6.7%) vs. 2019 (2.9, 5.4%; p = 0.041 and p = 0.006); but these differences were not statistically significant after risk adjustment.ConclusionsOverall quality of care for patients with AIS/TIA did not decline during the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke reperfusion therapy: data from the Lyon Stroke Center Network

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic would have particularly affected acute stroke care. However, its impact is clearly inherent to the local stroke network conditions. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care in the Lyon comprehensive stroke center during this period.

Methods

We conducted a prospective data collection of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) during the COVID-19 period (from 29/02/2020 to 10/05/2020) and a control period (from 29/02/2019 to 10/05/2019). The volume of reperfusion therapies and pre and intra-hospital delays were compared during both periods.

Results

A total of 208 patients were included. The volume of IVT significantly decreased during the COVID-period [55 (54.5%) vs 74 (69.2%); p = 0.03]. The volume of MT remains stable over the two periods [72 (71.3%) vs 65 (60.8%); p = 0.14], but the door-to-groin puncture time increased in patients transferred for MT (237 [187–339] vs 210 [163–260]; p < 0.01). The daily number of Emergency Medical Dispatch calls considerably increased (1502 [1133–2238] vs 1023 [960–1410]; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Our study showed a decrease in the volume of IVT, whereas the volume of MT remained stable although intra-hospital delays increased for transferred patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results contrast in part with the national surveys and suggest that the impact of the pandemic may depend on local stroke care networks.

     

Maintained acute stroke admission during the first wave COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden,a register-based study

ObjectivesClinicians and researchers have addressed concerns about the negative impact of COVID-19 outbreaks on the ability of health care systems to provide timely assessment and acute therapies to patients with stroke. The aim of this study is to describe stroke care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period the year before at an acute care hospital in Sweden.Materials and MethodsIn this cohort study data were collected from March 1^st to August 31^st in 2019 and 2020 on all patients diagnosed with stroke and TIA and registered at Danderyd Hospital in the national quality registry (Riksstroke). Data were completed with information from the hospital record. Sweden had no lockdown during 2020.ResultsDuring the study period in year 2019 there were 426 registered stroke patients at Danderyd hospital, compared to 403 registered stroke patients the same period during 2020 (p = 0.483). The number of minor stroke and TIA during the period in 2019 compared to 2020 were 468 versus 453 respectively (minor stroke p = 0.475 versus TIA p = 0.50).ConclusionsThere were no difference in the number of patients diagnosed with stroke and TIA during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Adaptive Approach to Endovascular Management of Large Vessel Occlusion During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented strain on the health care system. An adaptive strategy for the handling of thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion has evolved at our center to optimize patient care while also minimizing risk of virus transmission. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the new thrombectomy protocol by comparing thrombectomy times and patient outcomes during the pandemic and pre pandemic period.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent emergent thrombectomy from April 4th, 2020 to August 25th, 2020 (pandemic period) and between December 2^nd, 2019 to April 3rd, 2020 (pre-pandemic period). The new protocol centered on a standardized approach to airway management in patients considered ‘high-risk’ for infection. An array of patient-specific factors and outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 126 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in door-to-recanalization or other time parameters between the two groups (138 minutes during the pandemic vs. 129 minutes pre-pandemic; p=0.37). However, outcomes measured as discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were worse for patients during the pandemic (mRS ≤ 2, 10/58; 17.2% during pandemic vs. 24/68; 35.3% pre-pandemic, p = 0.02). No neurointerventional providers have been found to contract COVID-19.ConclusionOur approach to mechanical thrombectomy during the COVID-19 era was associated with similar recanalization rates but worse clinical outcomes compared to pre pandemic period. Further studies are necessary to identify factors contributing to worse outcomes during this ongoing pandemic.     

Safety of early antiplatelet administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with alteplase (SEAPT-24)

ObjectivesAlteplase, a tissue-type plasminogen activator, is recommended for ischemic stroke patients presenting within 4.5 h. Due to bleeding risks, current guidelines advise delaying antiplatelet therapy for 24 h after alteplase. However, specific scenarios may require antiplatelet therapy to be given within the 24 h window. This study aimed to examine the safety of early antiplatelet therapy administration within the first 24 h after alteplase.Materials and methodsThis study is a retrospective, observational study of adult patients with acute ischemic stroke who received alteplase across a multi-hospital system. Patients were grouped based on early antiplatelet therapy (within 24 h window) or as recommended per guidelines. The occurrence of bleeding events, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and/or gastrointestinal bleeding, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable outcomes (modified Rankin score 3–6), and hospital length of stay, were compared between groups.ResultsPatients were predominantly African American (72%) and female (53%) with a median age of 62 years. Median baseline NIHSS scores were higher in the early group (5 vs. 7; p = 0.04), and patients in the early group were more likely to undergo endovascular therapy (26% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001). In patients treated with alteplase only and who did not undergo endovascular therapy, there was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (1.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.1), gastrointestinal bleeding, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable outcomes, or length of stay.ConclusionsIn our retrospective analysis, early administration of antiplatelet therapy (< 24 h post-alteplase) did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, or unfavorable outcomes in patients who received alteplase alone for management of acute ischemic stroke. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.     

Hospital Discharge and Readmissions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic for California Acute Stroke Inpatients

BackgroundAcute stroke therapy and rehabilitation declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. We characterized changes in acute stroke disposition and readmissions during the pandemic.MethodsWe used the California State Inpatient Database in this retrospective observational study of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. We compared discharge disposition across a pre-pandemic period (January 2019 to February 2020) to a pandemic period (March to December 2020) using cumulative incidence functions (CIF), and re-admission rates using chi-squared.ResultsThere were 63,120 and 40,003 stroke hospitalizations in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, respectively. Pre-pandemic, the most common disposition was home [46%], followed by skilled nursing facility (SNF) [23%], and acute rehabilitation [13%]. During the pandemic, there were more home discharges [51%, subdistribution hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.19], decreased SNF discharges [17%, subdistribution hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.68-0.72], and acute rehabilitation discharges were unchanged [CIF, p<0.001]. Home discharges increased with increasing age, with an increase of 8.2% for those ≥85 years. SNF discharges decreased in a similar distribution by age. Thirty-day readmission rates were 12.7 per 100 hospitalizations pre-pandemic compared to 11.6 per 100 hospitalizations during the pandemic [p<0.001]. Home discharge readmission rates were unchanged between periods. Readmission rates for discharges to SNF (18.4 vs. 16.7 per 100 hospitalizations, p=0.003) and acute rehabilitation decreased (11.3 vs. 10.1 per 100 hospitalizations, p=0.034).ConclusionsDuring the pandemic a greater proportion of patients were discharged home, with no change in readmission rates. Research is needed to evaluate the impact on quality and financing of post-hospital stroke care.     

Acute ischemic stroke on anti-Xa inhibitors: Pharmacokinetics and outcomes

Background and PurposeDirect oral anticoagulant (DOAC) ingestion within 48 h is an exclusion for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. We aim to shed light on pharmacokinetic correlates and outcomes in patients with AIS excluded from thrombolysis due to DOAC use.MethodsThis is a single center retrospective study of consecutive patients with AIS within 4.5 h from last known normal and excluded from thrombolytic therapy due to confirmed Xa inhibitor DOAC (DOAC_Xa) intake within the prior 48 h. We used linear regression to test the correlation between time from last DOAC_Xa ingestion and anti-Xa level.ResultsOver a period of 2.5 years, we identified 44 patients who did not receive thrombolysis because of presumed DOAC intake within 48 h. In adjusted linear regression, there was an association between time from last DOAC ingestion and Xa level (beta = ?0.69, p < 0.001). Among the 37 patients with known atrial fibrillation not receiving alteplase due to DOAC use, the 90-day mortality was 35.1% (13/37) and 77% (10/13) of deaths were stroke related.ConclusionsPatients with AIS on DOAC therapy face a heightened risk of mortality. Studies are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in such patients based on time of last DOAC ingestion and/or anti-Xa/drug level.     

Utilization of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Reasons for Nonuse in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Saudi Arabia

Background: Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA, alteplase) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset decreases the rate of disability after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Due to various reasons, alteplase remains underutilized in certain regions (∼3% in low- and middle-income countries). Aims: We aimed to estimate the alteplase utilization rate and identify the reasons for nonuse in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients admitted with suspected stroke in the past 24 hours to the stroke unit at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from February 2016 to July 2018. We estimated the alteplase utilization rate among patients with AIS who could be treated within 4.5 hours of symptoms onset (≤225 minutes, allowing 45 minutes for door to needle time). We examined potential predictors of alteplase use using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Study was approved by local IRB. Results: Of 1366 patients with suspected stroke, 819 (60%) had AIS. The alteplase utilization rates were 8.6% and 29% for all AIS and AIS arrived within the therapeutic window, respectively. The most common reason for no alteplase treatment was late arrival. Only 244 (29.8%) of AIS patients arrived within the time window for treatment. Among patients with sudden neurological deficit who arrived within the therapeutic time window, the most common reasons were mild neurological deficit (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <5, 29.9%), stroke mimics (16.6%), and hemorrhagic stroke (8.1%). Conclusions: Our study showed a comparable alteplase utilization rate with most international estimates. The low utilization rate was mainly attributed to late patient arrival. Urgent interventions are needed to improve public awareness of stroke recognition and prehospital stroke care.     

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood pressure control after a stroke or transient ischemic attack among patients at VA medical centers

ObjectiveTo study factors associated with systolic blood pressure(SBP) control for patients post-discharge from an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA) during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to pre-pandemic periods within the Veterans Health Administration(VHA).Materials and MethodsWe analyzed retrospective data from patients discharged from Emergency Departments or inpatient admissions after an ischemic stroke or TIA. Cohorts consisted of 2,816 patients during March–September 2020 and 11,900 during the same months in 2017-2019. Outcomes included primary care or neurology clinic visits, recorded blood pressure readings and average blood pressure control in the 90-days post-discharge. Random effect logit models were used to compare clinical characteristics of the cohorts and relationships between patient characteristics and outcomes.ResultsThe majority (73%) of patients with recorded readings during the COVID-19 period had a mean post-discharge SBP within goal (<140 mmHg); this was slightly lower than the pre-COVID-19 period (78%; p=0.001). Only 38% of the COVID-19 cohort had a recorded SBP in the 90-days post-discharge compared with 83% of patients during the pre-pandemic period (p=0.001). During the pandemic period, 29% did not have follow-up primary care or neurologist visits, and 33% had a phone or video visit without a recorded SBP reading.ConclusionsPatients with an acute cerebrovascular event during the initial COVID-19 period were less likely to have outpatient visits or blood pressure measurements than during the pre-pandemic period; patients with uncontrolled SBP should be targeted for follow-up hypertension management.     

Outcomes with IV tenecteplase and IV alteplase for acute ischemic stroke with or without thrombectomy in real-world settings in the United States

Background and PurposeAlthough many stroke centers in United States are using intravenous (IV) tenecteplase (TNK) for acute ischemic stroke patients, there is paucity of comparative data between IV TNK and IV alteplase from real-world settings.Materials and MethodsWe analyzed the data from 122 healthcare facilities in Cerner Real World Data and included patients admitted between February 2016 to April 2022 to determine the effect of IV TNK (compared with IV alteplase) on occurrence of two outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients stratified by use of thrombectomy: non-routine discharge or death, and intracranial hemorrhage after adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsAmong 30,643 acute ischemic stroke patients analyzed, 29,480 (96.2%) and 1,163 (3.8%) patients received IV alteplase and IV TNK, respectively. The proportion of patients who received thrombectomy was significantly higher among patients who received IV TNK compared with those who received IV alteplase (16.7% versus 11.0%, p<0.001). Occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage was more common among patients treated with IV TNK in acute ischemic stroke patients who did not receive thrombectomy (7.9% versus 5.1%, p<0.001) but not in those who received thrombectomy (20.1% versus 16.8%, p = 0.234). In the logistic regression analysis, patients treated with IV TNK who did not receive thrombectomy were at higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.34, 95% CI 1.05-1.72, p = 0.02) after adjusting for age (age strata), gender, race/ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, malignancy, nicotine dependence, previous ischemic stroke, previous transient ischemic attack, previous intracerebral hemorrhage, previous subarachnoid hemorrhage, previous acute myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis of aorta, previous AKI, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and hospital type, aphasia, hemiplegia, neglect, somnolence, stupor and coma, dysphagia, and homonymous hemianopsia. There was no difference in the rate of non-routine discharge or death between patients treated with IV TNK and those treated with IV alteplase in the multivariate analyses.ConclusionsIn an analysis of real-world data, IV TNK was associated with higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage compared with IV alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke who did not undergo thrombectomy.     

Trends in admissions for intracranial dissections in the United States

IntroductionIntracranial artery dissection (IAD) is rarer than cervical artery dissections (CeAD), and information is based on limited series with small cohorts. There are only several small-scale studies attempting to characterize the natural history of the disease. Herein, we analyze the prevalence of IADs in hospitalized patients using a national database.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016–2019 for patients with a diagnosis of unruptured intracranial dissection (uIAD) using ICD-10-CM codes (I67.0). Moreover, patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and CeAD were extracted to compare its prevalence among patients with concomitant AIS (+/-dissections). The Cochrane-Armitage test was conducted to assess trends in the prevalence of uIADs among those with concomitant AIS or among all craniocervical dissections.ResultsThere were 725 hospitalizations involving uIAD, while there were 62,220 involving CeADs. uIADs represented 5.1 per million hospitalizations across 2016–2019. The average age of presentation was 56.9 years (SE: 1.62), while it was 54.4 (SE: 0.17) for CeADs (p = 0.13). Females were represented among 44.8% (n = 325) of uIADs, a similar proportion compared to CeADs (44.3%%, n = 27,530; p = 0.89). Compared to CeADs, AIS and motor deficits were more common in uIAD (71.72% vs. 47.0%; p < 0.001). There were 18.6 uIAD with concomitant AIS per 100,000 with AIS. uIADs represented 1.75% of all dissections with concomitant AIS (n = 520/29,750).There was no trend in the average age of presentation for uIADs. Proportion of females among those with uIADs increased from 36.8% in 2016 to 59.5% in 2019 (trend: +9.46% per year; 95% CI: 3.13 to 15.8; p = 0.004). There was no trend in the proportion of races among those with uIADs.ConclusionThe prevalence of uIADs among hospitalized patients is very low, and only 1.75% of craniocervical dissection-related AIS is due to uIAD. Compared to CeADs, patients were more likely to be male, and uIAD more commonly led to acute ischemic stroke and motor deficits. The trend in age remained stable across the four years analyzed, while the proportion of females increased. There was no trend in the proportion of races among uIADs, however.     

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic on the Number of Strokes and Mechanical Thrombectomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on stroke care, including the number of stroke alerts/codes, number of reperfusions, and number of thrombectomies during the pandemic compared to those during the pre-pandemic period.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, EuropePMC, and Cochrane Central databases. The data of interest were the number of strokes, reperfusions, and mechanical thrombectomies during the COVID-19 pandemic versus that during the pre-pandemic period (in a historical comparator group over a specified period of same period length).ResultsThe study included 59,233 subjects from 9 studies. Meta-analysis showed that the number of stroke alerts during the pandemic was 64% (56–71%) of that during the pre-pandemic period. The number of reperfusion therapies during the pandemic was 69% (61–77%) of that during the pre-pandemic period. Pooled analysis showed that the number of mechanical thrombectomies performed during the pandemic was 78% (75–80%) of that during the pre-pandemic period. The number of mechanical thrombectomies per stroke patient was higher during the pandemic (OR 1.23 [1.12–1.36], p < 0.001; I²: 0%, p = 0.845).ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that the number of stroke alerts, reperfusions, and mechanical thrombectomies was reduced by 36%, 31%, and 22%, respectively, during the pandemic. However, the number of patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy per stroke increased.     

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care: An analysis of the 24-month data from a comprehensive stroke center in Shanghai,China

Introduction

Whether the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is associated with a long-term negative impact on acute stroke care remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the timing of key aspects of stroke codes between patients before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic hospital in Shanghai, China and included all adult patients with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized via the emergency department (ED) stroke pathway during the 24 months since the COVID-19 outbreak (COVID-19: January 1, 2020–December 31, 2021). The comparison cohort included patients with ED stroke pathway visits and hospitalizations during the same period (pre-COVID-19: January 1, 2018–December 31, 2019). We compared critical time points of prehospital and intrahospital acute stroke care between patients during the COVID-19 era and patients during the pre-COVID-19 era using t test, χ², and Mann–Whitney U test where appropriate.

Results

A total of 1194 acute ischemic stroke cases were enrolled, including 606 patients in COVID-19 and 588 patients in pre-COVID-19. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the median onset-to-hospital time was about 108 min longer compared with the same period of pre-COVID-19 (300 vs 192 min, p = 0.01). Accordingly, the median onset-to-needle time was 169 min in COVID-19 and 113 min in pre-COVID-19 (p = 0.0001), and the proportion of patients with onset-to-hospital time within 4.5 h was lower (292/606 [48.2%] vs 328/558 [58.8%], p = 0.0003) during the pandemic period. Furthermore, the median door-to-inpatient admission and door-to-inpatient rehabilitation times increased from 28 to 37 h and from 3 to 4 days (p = 0.014 and 0.0001).

Conclusions

During the 24 months of COVID-19, a prolongation of stroke onset to hospital arrival and to intravenous rt-PA administration times were noted. Meanwhile, acute stroke patients needed to stay in the ED for a longer time before hospitalization. Educational system support and process optimization should be pursued in order to acquire timely delivery of stroke care during the pandemic.     

Temporal sustainability of guideline based door-to-needle times for intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

BackgroundDoor to needle (DTN) time provides valuable insight into stroke care workflow and is a performance indicator of an acute stroke unit. The aim of the current study was to ascertain whether a door to needle time of less than 60 min can be achieved for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and maintained long term in a comprehensive stroke unit.MethodsPatients with AIS treated with IVT in the stroke unit formed the study group. Demographic and clinical characteristics including door to imaging (DTI) time, DTN time, and 3 month functional outcome were abstracted. Pairwise comparison was done of yearly median DTI and DTN times with Bonferroni correction.ResultsOver a period of 6 years a total of 196 patients with mean age of 61.5 ± 13.1 years and median (IQR) NIHSS 11 (8–16) underwent IVT. The median DTI time and DTN time over the study period was 15 (12–21) minutes and 40 (30–50) minutes respectively. A total of 90.1%, 69.4% and 29.1% patients received IVT within 60 min, 45 min and 30 min respectively. On pairwise comparison of the median yearly DTN Year 2016 and 2017 were lower compared to most of the earlier years (p < 0.0001). Good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) was noted in 68.7% patients at 3 months follow-up.ConclusionIt is possible to sustainably reduce DTN time for IVT in AIS to well below the current 60 min benchmark with hospital system training and teamwork.     

Low versus standard dose intravenous alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Egyptian patients

Objectives:To assess low dose altepase outcome and safety in comparison with a standard-dose regimen for acute ischemic stroke treatment in Egyptian patients.Materials:An observational prospective cohort non-randomized single blinded study was carried out during the period from November 2017 to December 2018. Eighty Egyptian acute ischemic stroke patients, all eligible for intravenous alteplase, were subdivided into 2 groups (40 patients in each group). Patients were thrombolysed at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg in the first group and 0.9 mg/kg in the second group. Both groups were compared in regard to safety and outcome. Safety was expressed by the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and 3 months mortality, while outcome was expressed by favorable outcomes at three months (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] of 0 to 2).Results:In the first group, 69.2% (n=27) achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days compared with 64.1% (n=25) in the second group (p=0.631). Ninety-day mortality was 5% (n=2) in the first group versus 2.5% (n=1) in the second group (p=0.556). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was noted in 3 patients in the second group and zero patients in the first group (p=0.077).Conclusion:Low-dose alteplase could be a practical alternative for Egyptian populations with acute ischemic stroke especially in 3 to 4.5 hours window.

Cerebrovascular stroke is the second death and the seventh disability leading cause worldwide.¹ Tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) alteplase was the first medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment on June 1996, within 3 hours of stroke onset with a recommended dose of 0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90mg).² In 2008, the safety of using alteplase within 3 to 4.5 hours of stroke onset was approved by the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (SITS -ISTR)³ and the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS III).⁴ However, thrombolytic therapy use has not been widely adopted, especially in developing countries. The restricted time window (3 to 4.5 hours), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk and the drug high cost are major obstacles preventing its broad application.⁵ Coagulation and fibrinolysis responses differ among different races, which increase symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) risk with standard-dose alteplase⁶ in Asian populations, many Asian neurologists considered alteplase low dose to be a better alternative for ischemic stroke treatment. Many studies had been conducted in order to prove the efficacy and safety of Alteplase low dose.^7-9 One of these studies was the Japan Alteplase Clinical Trial (J-ACT) conducted by Yamaguchi et al¹⁰ According to this study, using a 0.6 mg/kg dose of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in Japanese patients was safe and effective. Despite the relatively stroke high rate among Egyptian populations, 963/100,000 inhabitants, only less than 1% of stroke patients receive intravenous thrombolysis. A major reason for this is the drug cost.^11,12 Low-dose regimens (0.6 mg/kg) use will lower the economic burden of thrombolytic therapy in the community and will greatly promote the implementation of this therapy in Egypt. Our study aim was to assess the outcome and safety of alteplase low dose in comparison to the standard-dose regimen in AIS treatment in Egypt.     

Stent reconstruction in intracranial atherosclerotic disease related acute ischemic stroke results in high revascularization rates

ObjectivesIntracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a major cause of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our study aimed to analyze the effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in patients with ICAD undergoing rescue treatment in terms of functional outcome and mortality rate at 90 days and compare the results to LVO with thromboembolic origins.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of a mechanical thrombectomy (MT) single center database from 01/2019 to 09/2021 was carried out using chart review and angiogram analysis. From 469 acute stroke patients, 361 patients were enroled in the study, of whom twenty-four (6.6%) were diagnosed with underlying ICAD and treated with angioplasty and stent reconstruction (PTAS) with a standardized medication protocol. Successful reperfusion, peri-procedural complications, and functional independence at 90 days were collected as outcomes.ResultsThere was no difference in age or admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Onset to groin puncture (median 460 vs 277 min, P = 0.019) was significantly longer in the ICAD group. The procedure time (median 73 vs 60 min, P = 0.137) did not differ. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 95.8% of ICAD and 91.1% of the remaining patients (P = 0.445). Functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) at 90 days was achieved in 45.8% (11/24) and 42.7% (144/337, (P = 0.767)). The mortality rates (mRS 6) at 90 days were similar (29.2% vs 29.4% (P = 0.983)).ConclusionDespite significantly longer treatment delays, the outcome and revascularization rates of ICAD patients were similar to the thromboembolic cohort. Our proposed protocol of PTAS and medication protocol in ICAD was effective with a similar safety profile as MT in general.     

Changes in Characteristics,Treatment and Outcome in Patients with Hemorrhagic Stroke During COVID-19

Background and PurposeThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a comprehensive impact on healthcare services worldwide. We sought to determine whether COVID-19 affected the treatment and prognosis of hemorrhagic stroke in a regional medical center in mainland China.MethodsPatients with hemorrhagic stroke admitted in the Neurosurgery Department of West China Hospital from January 24, 2020, to March 25, 2020 (COVID-19 period), and from January 24, 2019, to March 25, 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period), were identified. Clinical characteristics, hospital arrival to neurosurgery department arrival time (door-to-department time), reporting rate of pneumonia and 3-month mRS (outcome) were compared.ResultsA total of 224 patients in the pre-COVID-19 period were compared with 126 patients in the COVID-19 period. Milder stroke severity was observed in the COVID-19 period (NIHSS 6 [2–20] vs. 3 [2–15], p = 0.005). The median door-to-department time in the COVID-19 period was approximately 50 minutes longer than that in the pre-COVID-19 period (96.5 [70.3–193.3] vs. 144.5 [93.8–504.5], p = 0.000). A higher rate of pneumonia complications was reported in the COVID-19 period (40.6% vs. 60.7%, p = 0.000). In patients with moderate hemorrhagic stroke, the percentage of good outcomes (mRS < 3) in the pre-COVID-19 period was much higher than that in the COVID-19 period (53.1% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.047).ConclusionsCOVID-19 may have several impacts on the treatment of hemorrhagic stroke and may influence the clinical outcomes of specific patients. Improvements in the treatment process for patients with moderate stroke may help to improve the overall outcome of hemorrhagic stroke during COVID-19.     

International Survey of Mechanical Thrombectomy Stroke Systems of Care During COVID-19 Pandemic

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare systems across the world but its impact on acute stroke care is just being elucidated. We hypothesized a major global impact of COVID-19 not only on stroke volumes but also on various aspects of thrombectomy systems.AimsWe conducted a convenience electronic survey with a 21-item questionnaire aimed to identify the changes in stroke admission volumes and thrombectomy treatment practices seen during a specified time period of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThe survey was designed using Qualtrics software and sent to stroke and neuro-interventional physicians around the world who are part of the Global Executive Committee (GEC) of Mission Thrombectomy 2020, a global coalition under the aegis of Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, between April 5th and May 15th, 2020.ResultsThere were 113 responses to the survey across 25 countries with a response rate of 31% among the GEC members. Globally there was a median 33% decrease in stroke admissions and a 25% decrease in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic period until May 15th, 2020 compared to pre-pandemic months. The intubation policy for MT procedures during the pandemic was highly variable across participating centers: 44% preferred intubating all patients, including 25% of centers that changed their policy to preferred-intubation (PI) from preferred non-intubation (PNI). On the other hand, 56% centers preferred not intubating patients undergoing MT, which included 27% centers that changed their policy from PI to PNI. There was no significant difference in rate of COVID-19 infection between PI versus PNI centers (p=0.60) or if intubation policy was changed in either direction (p=1.00). Low-volume (<10 stroke/month) compared with high-volume stroke centers (>20 strokes/month) were less likely to have neurointerventional suite specific written personal protective equipment protocols (74% vs 88%) and if present, these centers were more likely to report them to be inadequate (58% vs 92%).ConclusionOur data provides a comprehensive snapshot of the impact on acute stroke care observed worldwide during the pandemic. Overall, respondents reported decreased stroke admissions as well as decreased cases of MT with no clear preponderance in intubation policy during MT.Data access statementThe corresponding author will consider requests for sharing survey data. The study was exempt from institutional review board approval as it did not involve patient level data.     

Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Webs: A Matched Case Control Study

Background and purposeThe baseline characteristics of patients with symptomatic carotid web (CaW) are unclear. We investigate demographic and cerebrovascular risk factors in patients with this overlooked stroke etiology.MethodsWe identified consecutive patients diagnosed with symptomatic CaW at a comprehensive stroke center from July 2014-December 2018. These patients were matched at a 1:4 ratio (based on age and NIHSS scores) to create a control group of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with non-CaW etiologies from the local GetWithTheGuidelines stroke database.ResultsThirty patients with symptomatic CaW were compared to 120 AIS patients with non-CaW etiologies. Symptomatic CaW patients were more likely to be female (73.3 vs. 44.2%; p = 0.004) and black (86.7 vs. 64.2%; p = 0.02). Symptomatic CaWs patients had a fewer absolute number of modifiable cerebrovascular risk factors (1.7±1.1 vs. 2.5±1.2; p = 0.002), lower rates of hypertension (43.4 vs. 63.3%; p = 0.04), and a more favorable lipid profile with lower average LDL (89.5±30.3 vs. 111.2±43.7 mg/dL; p = 0.01) and higher average HDL (47.9±11.3 vs. 42.2±13.8 mg/dL; p = 0.01) as compared to strokes with non-CaW etiology. Symptomatic CaW patients were more likely to have a large vessel occlusion (80.0 vs. 51.7%; p = 0.005), despite similar e-ASPECTS between the groups (8.1±2.1 vs. 8.3±2.2; p = 0.30). On multivariable analysis, symptomatic CaW was an independent predictor of independence at discharge (OR 3.72; 95%CI 1.27–10.94).ConclusionA gender and racial predilection of symptomatic CaWs may exist as females and blacks were were found to be more likely affected. Symptomatic CaW patients have a more benign cerebrovascular risk factor profile corroborating the proposed mechanism of local stasis and thromboembolism. Despite presenting more commonly with LVO, symptomatic CaW was associated with good functional outcome, warranting further studies.     

Organized multi-disciplinary stroke team care improves acute stroke outcomes in resource limited settings; Results of a retrospective study from a Nigerian tertiary hospital

BackgroundEvidence for the impact of organized stroke multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) on outcomes in Africa is sparse.AimTo compare stroke outcomes, before and after the establishment (September 16, 2016) of a pioneer MDT at a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria.MethodsUsing a retrospective, observational study design, the in-patient record of all stroke patients admitted between September 2014 to September 2018 was retrieved and rigorously reviewed. 155 patients seen 2 years before the MDT were compared with 169 stroke patients seen 2 years after the MDT. Stroke severity at admission and functioning at discharge were assessed using the Stroke Levity Scale (SLS) and the modified Rankin scale (mRS).ResultsMean ages (in years) were 60 pre-MDT vs 59.57 post MDT (p = 0.754). There were more males, 51% pre-MDT vs 54.2% post MDT (p = 0.565). SLS and mRS were not significantly different; severe SLS and mRS pre-MDT, 52.9% vs post-MDT, 49.4% (p = 0.727) and pre-MDT 19.4% vs post-MDT 19.5% (p = 0.685) respectively. More post-MDT patients were discharged alive, pre-MDT,56.8% vs 79.2% post MDT (p < 0.001); had swallow tests, pre-MDT 9.23% vs post-MDT 33.5% (p < 0.001); on secondary prevention, pre-MDT 67.7% vs post-MDT 78.9% (p = 0.023); had more clinic visits, pre-MDT,0.7% vs post-MDT 38.3% (p < 0.001). MDT was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality on multivariable regression, adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% Confidence interval CI) 0.17 (0.09–0.32).ConclusionOur results suggest that an organized MDT may improve acute outcomes and reduce mortality in resource constrained settings where there may be no stroke units. These findings need further prospective validation.