Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study

Shoulder arthroplasty outcomes have been reported in many case series. Typically, these series have followed either a single prosthesis used to treat a variety of arthritic disorders of the shoulder or experience in a single institution. In contrast, this report of a prospective study summarizes the experience of several surgeons with a single prosthetic design for treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A prospective, multicenter clinical outcome study evaluated 176 shoulders in 160 patients with primary osteoarthritis. This study evaluated a single prosthetic design (Global Shoulder) used by 19 contributing surgeons. Enrollment included 133 total shoulder replacements and 43 humeral head replacements (hemiarthroplasty) in 98 men and 62 women. Neither age nor sex affected whether hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. Patients with full-thickness cuff tears preferentially had hemiarthroplasty. The decision to perform total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty was based on the surgeon's preference. There were significant improvements (P <.001) in all evaluated and self-assessed outcome parameters from the preoperative baseline for both total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty. The results confirm that prosthetic arthroplasty leads to dramatic improvement in pain, function, and patient satisfaction. Intraoperative complications occurred in 5.4% of cases, and postoperative complications occurred in 7.8%. The most common intraoperative complications were intraoperative fractures, occurring in 9 cases. The most common postoperative complications were glenoid component loosening and humeral head subluxation. Almost all cases of humeral head instability were associated with rotator cuff tears or glenoid component loosening (or both). Seven shoulders underwent 9 additional surgeries during the 5-year study period. Thirteen shoulders in 11 patients were lost as a result of death unrelated to the procedure; 2 shoulders in 1 patient were lost within 3 days/3 months after the bilateral replacements as a result of death from pulmonary embolism. Nine percent of the shoulders (16/176) had full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Eight of the 16 shoulders with full-thickness supraspinatus cuff tears had hemiarthroplasty. All of these tears were isolated to the supraspinatus tendon, and all were repairable. There were no differences in postoperative pain, function, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, or range of motion. There were no differences between total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in those patients with a reparable rotator cuff tear. Total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of primary osteoarthritis result in good or excellent pain relief, improvement in function, and patient satisfaction in 95% of cases. Avoiding intraoperative humeral shaft fractures through use of an uncemented, canal-filling prosthetic stem requires careful attention to reaming and component sizing. Postoperative humeral head subluxation is often associated with other factors including rotator cuff tears or glenoid component loosening.     

Preoperative factors associated with improvements in shoulder function after humeral hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the characteristics of the shoulder that can be determined before humeral hemiarthroplasty and the functional improvement after surgery is not known. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the functional outcome of this procedure correlated significantly with factors that are identifiable preoperatively. METHODS: The study group included seventy-one shoulders in sixty-eight patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty, performed by the same surgeon, for diagnoses other than acute fracture. The mean age of the patients was sixty-one years (range, thirty to eighty-three years). The results were characterized in terms of the change in self-assessed shoulder function and general health status at an average of forty-nine months (range, twenty-four to 142 months) after surgery. RESULTS: The preoperative absence of erosion of the glenoid was associated with greater improvement in shoulder function and level of comfort after hemiarthroplasty (p < 0.001). Shoulders that had not had previous surgery had greater functional improvement than did those that had previous surgery (p = 0.012). Shoulders with an intact rotator cuff showed significantly (p < 0.5) greater improvement in the ability to lift weight above shoulder level after hemiarthroplasty (p <0.5). With regard to diagnoses, shoulders with rheumatoid arthritis, capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, and cuff tear arthropathy had the least functional improvement, whereas those with osteonecrosis (p = 0.0004) and with primary (p = 0.02) and secondary degenerative joint disease (p = 0.03) had the greatest improvement. Patient age and gender did not significantly affect the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the functional improvement following humeral hemiarthroplasty is related to factors that are identifiable before surgery. These data may be of benefit in preoperative discussions with patients who have a shoulder disorder and are considering treatment with hemiarthroplasty.     

Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: The results of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis have been reported to be excellent or good for the majority of patients, but the value of using a glenoid component and the anatomic factors that affect outcome are still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of an operatively confirmed full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff, the severity of preoperative erosion of glenoid bone, preoperative radiographic evidence of subluxation of the humeral head, and the severity of preoperative loss of the passive range of motion on the outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: In a multicenter clinical outcome study, we evaluated 128 shoulders in 118 patients with primary osteoarthritis who had been followed for a mean of forty-six months (range, twenty-four to eighty-seven months). RESULTS: Patients with <10 degrees of passive external rotation preoperatively had significantly less improvement in external rotation after hemiarthroplasty (p = 0.006). Thirteen (10%) of the 128 shoulders had a repairable full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon, but these tears did not affect the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the decrease in pain, or patient satisfaction. Severe or moderate eccentric glenoid erosion was seen in twenty-nine (23%) of the 128 shoulders, and total shoulder arthroplasty resulted in significantly better passive total elevation and active external rotation as well as a trend toward significantly better active forward flexion than did hemiarthroplasty in these shoulders. The humeral head was subluxated posteriorly in twenty-three shoulders (18%), and when they were compared with the other shoulders in the study, these shoulders were found to have lower final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, more pain, and decreased active external rotation following either total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our data, we recommend the use of a glenoid component in shoulders with glenoid erosion. Humeral head subluxation was associated with a less favorable result regardless of the type of shoulder arthroplasty and must be considered in preoperative planning and counseling. Severe loss of the passive range of motion preoperatively was associated with a decreased passive range of motion postoperatively. A repairable tear of the supraspinatus tendon is not a contraindication to the use of a glenoid component. .     

Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair

Purpose:Arthroscopic transosseous (TO) rotator cuff repair has recently emerged as a new option for surgical treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Limited data is available regarding outcomes using this technique. This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes following a novel arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair technique.Results:Statistically significant improvements were noted in forward flexion, external rotation and internal rotation (P < 0.0001). Average postoperative subjective shoulder value was 93.7, simple shoulder test 11.6, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score 94.6. According to ASES scores, results for the 109 shoulders available for final follow-up were excellent in 95 (87.1%), good in 8 (7.3%), fair in 3 (2.8%), and poor in 3 (2.8%). There was no difference in ROM or outcome scores in patients who underwent a concomitant biceps procedure (tenodesis or tenotomy) compared with those who did not. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in outcome between patients who underwent either biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. Age, history of injury preceding the onset of pain, tear size, number of TO tunnels required to perform the repair, and presence of fatty infiltration did not correlate with postoperative ROM or subjective outcome measures at final follow-up. Two complications and four failures were noted.Conclusions:Arthroscopic TO rotator cuff repair technique leads to statistically significant midterm improvement in ROM and satisfactory midterm subjective outcome scores with low complication/failure rates in patients with average medium-sized rotator cuff tears with minimal fatty infiltration. Further work is required to evaluate radiographic healing rates with this technique and to compare outcomes following suture anchor repair.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV     

Prosthetic replacement in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders

We reviewed a series of 30 shoulders in 25 patients who had glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency and who underwent prosthetic replacement. Nineteen shoulders underwent humeral head replacement, and 11 shoulders had total shoulder arthroplasty. Meticulous mobilization and reconstruction of the deficiencies in the thin atrophic rotator cuff tissues were attempted in all shoulders. Emphasis was placed on anteroposterior stability, and this was achieved in all shoulders; superior coverage was fully achieved in 15 shoulders and was partially achieved in 11. All shoulders had less pain after surgery, and 93% achieved satisfactory pain relief. Total shoulder arthroplasty and humeral hemiarthroplasty were found to provide similar results with respect to pain relief, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction. Shoulders with hemiarthroplasty gained significantly more active elevation (+52° vs + 2°) after surgery. Cuff repair was easier when a humeral head prosthesis alone was used because less lateralization of the humerus occurred. Also, operative time, anesthesia time, and blood loss were decreased with hemiarthroplasty. Because the lack of glenoid resurfacing did not adversely affect pain relief or function and avoided the potential problem of glenoid loosening, we favor humeral hemiarthroplasty as a treatment for glenohumeral arthritis in the rotator cuff-deficient shoulder.     

Prognostic Factors in Arthroplasty in the Rheumatoid Shoulder

Total shoulder arthroplasty is commonly considered a good option for treatment of the rheumatoid shoulder. However, when the rotator cuff and glenoid bone stock are not preserved, the clinical outcome of arthroplasty in the rheumatoid patients remains unclear. Aim of the study is to explore the prognostic value of multiple preoperative and peroperative variables in total shoulder arthroplasty and shoulder hemiarthroplasty in rheumatoid patients. Clinical Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder score was determined at different time points over a mean period of 6.5 years in 66 rheumatoid patients with total shoulder arthroplasty and 75 rheumatoid patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty. Moreover, radiographic analysis was performed to assess the progression of humeral head migration and glenoid loosening. Advanced age and erosions or cysts at the AC joint at time of surgery were associated with a lower postoperative Clinical Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder score. In total shoulder arthroplasty, status of the rotator cuff and its repair at surgery were predictive of postoperative improvement. Progression of proximal migration during the period after surgery was associated with a lower clinical score over time. However, in hemiarthroplasty, no relation was observed between the progression of proximal or medial migration during follow-up and the clinical score over time. Status of the AC joint and age at the time of surgery should be taken into account when considering shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients. Total shoulder arthroplasty in combination with good cuff repair yields comparable clinical results as total shoulder arthroplasty when the cuff is intact.     

The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND: The impact of a recurrent defect on the outcome after rotator cuff repair has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and anatomic results after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with use of ultrasound as an imaging modality to determine the postoperative integrity of the repair. METHODS: Eighteen patients who had complete arthroscopic repair of a tear measuring >2 cm in the transverse dimension were evaluated at a minimum of twelve months after surgery and again at two years after surgery. The evaluation consisted of a standardized history and physical examination as well as calculation of the preoperative and postoperative shoulder scores according to the system of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. The strength of both shoulders was quantitated postoperatively with use of a portable dynamometer. Ultrasound studies were performed with use of an established and validated protocol at a minimum of twelve months after surgery. RESULTS: Recurrent tears were seen in seventeen of the eighteen patients. Despite the absence of healing at twelve months after surgery, thirteen patients had an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of >/=90 points. Sixteen patients had an improvement in the functional outcome score, which increased from an average of 48.3 to 84.6 points. Sixteen patients had a decrease in pain, and twelve had no pain. Although eight patients had preoperative forward elevation to <95 degrees, all eighteen regained motion above shoulder level and had an average of 152 degrees of elevation. At the second evaluation, a minimum of twenty-four months after surgery, the average score, according to the system of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, had decreased to 79.9 points; only nine patients had a score of >/=90 points, and six patients had a score of /=80.     

Outcome of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty

We report the outcome of humeral head surface replacement hemiarthroplasty performed at our institution using the Copeland prosthesis. We followed 56 shoulders (52 patients) for a mean of 34.2 months (range, 24-63 months). Two were lost to follow-up, and there were six deaths unrelated to the shoulder surgery. Preoperative diagnoses in the remainder were osteoarthritis (20), rheumatoid arthritis (26), rotator cuff tear arthropathy (1), and post-traumatic arthrosis (1). The mean age was 68 years. Constant scores for the whole group improved from a mean preoperative score of 16.4 (range, 8-36) to 54.0 (range, 20-83) at last follow-up (P < .05). Three cases underwent subsequent arthroscopic subacromial decompression for impingement symptoms. One case required revision for aseptic loosening to a stemmed implant. Contained, nonprogressive osteolysis was seen in 2 cases. One periprosthetic humeral neck fracture was managed successfully nonoperatively. These results are comparable to those obtained with a modern stemmed hemiarthroplasty and are similar to Copeland's own series.     

Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: The indications for resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis of the shoulder are not clearly defined; some investigators routinely perform hemiarthroplasty whereas others perform total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Forty-seven patients (fifty-one shoulders) who were scheduled to have a shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis were randomly assigned, according to a random-numbers table, to one of two groups: replacement of the humeral head with resurfacing of the glenoid with a polyethylene component with cement (total shoulder arthroplasty [twenty-seven shoulders]) or replacement of the humeral head without resurfacing of the glenoid (hemiarthroplasty [twenty-four shoulders]). All patients received the same type of humeral component, and all operations were performed by or under the direct supervision of the same surgeon. The patients were followed for a mean of thirty-five months (range, twenty-four to seventy-two months) postoperatively. Evaluation was performed with use of the scoring systems of the University of California at Los Angeles and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. RESULTS: No difference was observed between the preoperative scores for the two groups of patients. Postoperatively, the mean scores with use of the University of California at Los Angeles system and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons system were 23.2 points (range, 10 to 31 points) and 65.2 points (range, 15 to 94 points), respectively, after hemiarthroplasty and 27.4 points (range, 9 to 34 points) and 77.3 points (range, 3 to 100 points), respectively, after total shoulder arthroplasty. With the numbers available for study, no significant difference was found between the two operative groups with respect to the postoperative score. (Thirty-five subjects per group would be needed, assuming an effect size of 0.60 and a power of 0.80.) Total shoulder arthroplasty provided significantly greater pain relief (p = 0.002) and internal rotation (p = 0.003) than hemiarthroplasty did. Total shoulder arthroplasty also provided superior results in the specific areas of patient satisfaction, function, and strength, although none of these differences were found to be significant, with the numbers available. Total shoulder arthroplasty was associated with increased cost ($1177), operative time (thirty-five minutes), and blood loss (150 milliliters) per patient compared with hemiarthroplasty. To date, none of the total shoulder arthroplasties in the study group have been revised. Hemiarthroplasty yielded equivalent results for elevation and external rotation. Three of the twenty-five patients who had had a hemiarthroplasty needed a subsequent operation for resurfacing of the glenoid. The mean cost for the revision operations was $15,998. CONCLUSIONS: Total shoulder arthroplasty provided superior pain relief compared with hemiarthroplasty in patients who had glenohumeral osteoarthritis, but it was associated with an increased cost of $1177 per patient.     

Shoulder replacement in end-stage rotator cuff tear arthropathy: 5- to 11-year follow-up analysis of the bi-polar shoulder prosthesis

Between 1991 and 1997, 49 patients with rotator cuff arthropathy underwent 52 Bi-Polar shoulder replacements and were followed for 5-11 years (average follow-up 6.7 years). Active forward flexion increased an average of 35.2 degrees (from 45 degrees preoperatively to 80.2 degrees postoperatively). UCLA scores improved from 8.4 (range 4-16) preoperatively to 24.3 (range 15-35) postoperatively. Average age- and sex-adjusted Constant scores were 83.4% and ASES index was 68.5 points at the time of final review. Two shoulders (3.8%) were revised--both secondary to periprosthetic fracture requiring long-stem implants. Probability of survival at 11 years using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates was 93.3% (95% Cl: 84%-100%). Bipolar shoulder arthroplasty is an effective way to treat end-stage rotator cuff arthropathy with clinical results as good or better than those reported in the literature for hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder replacement with reasonable follow-up.     

Elective shoulder arthroplasty in patients older than ninety years of age

This study examined the outcome of elective shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis or rotator cuff arthropathy in patients aged older than 90 years. The study included 7 shoulders in 6 patients with an average age of 93 years 5 months, (range, 91 years 0 months to 97 years 4 months). Average follow-up was 2.2 years, (range, 1-4 years). Preoperative range of motion, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) scores were obtained and compared with postoperative values at 3 and 6 months and yearly thereafter. Average forward elevation improved from 87 degrees to 137 degrees (P < .00001), and external rotation to the side improved from 0 degrees to 50 degrees (P < .0001). The SST scores improved from a preoperative average of 2.0 to 6.1 at 3 months (P < .0001), 6.9 at 6 months (P < .0001), 8.0 at 1 year (P < .00001), and 7.4 at 2 years (P < .0001). Significant improvements occurred in 6 of 8 SF-36 domains: Mental Health (P < .05), Vitality (P < .01), Role limitations due to emotional problems (P < .05), Social Function (P < .001), Role limitations due to physical health (P < .001), and Comfort (P < .00001). No patient had worse pain or function postoperatively. These data suggest that elective shoulder arthroplasty can be performed in patients 90 years of age and older, providing excellent pain relief, improved functional outcome, and enhanced general health status.     

Unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty. A five-year average follow-up study

A series of 42 total shoulder arthroplasties and four humeral hemiarthroplasties were performed with either the English-McNab or Neer prosthesis. Retrospective follow-up study averaged five years with a three-year minimum. Preoperative diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, avascular necrosis, failed prosthesis, and congenital dislocation. Postoperatively, pain improved in 94% of shoulders, and active range of motion improved an average of 42 degrees in abduction and 47 degrees in forward flexion. Rotator cuff lesions were correlated with poorer postoperative function. Complications developed in four shoulders (9%) and consisted of humeral component protrusions (two shoulders), loosened prosthesis (one shoulder), and unrecognized, preoperative tuberculous infection (one shoulder). Fifteen glenoid components (36%) and six humeral components (13%) developed lucent lines roentgenographically, but only one glenoid component developed migration.     

Cuff tear arthropathy is best treated with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Cuff tear arthropathy is the arthritic eroded collapse of the glenohumeral joint with progressive superior humeral migration in the setting of long-standing rotator cuff insufficiency. The ideal management of cuff tear arthropathy remains elusive. Current arthroplasty options include hemiarthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Proper clinical and radiographic evaluation is essential in decision making in order to optimize outcomes. Acromio-humeral distance (AHD), as measured on plain radiographs, as well as fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles on MRI are reliable tools for decision making. AHD < 7 mm correlates well with complete tear of the supraspinatus while AHD < 5 mm indicates infraspinatus involvement with significant muscular atrophy. Hemiarthroplasty remains an option for providing pain relief; however, continued development of superior migration and glenoid erosion remains a concern. The conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty can be difficult due to glenoid bone loss. Recent literature supports the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty over hemiarthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy with significant differences in functional outcome. Here, we discuss the radiographic evaluation of cuff tear arthropathy and review the treatment options and why we advocate the use of the reverse prosthesis.     

Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are similar in rotator cuff-intact and rotator cuff-deficient shoulders

BackgroundControversy exists regarding the biomechanical and clinical effects of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in shoulders with an intact versus a torn rotator cuff (RC). We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after RTSA for cuff-intact or cuff-deficient conditions.MethodsRetrospective review identified 182 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up: 32 with an intact rotator cuff but advanced glenoid bone loss and 150 with a torn rotator cuff. Revision arthroplasties and those for osteonecrosis or trauma were excluded, and a matched cohort was created to compare 32 cuff-intact to 32 cuff-deficient shoulders. Assessments included preoperative and postoperative visual analog pain scores (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, narcotic use, strength, range of motion (ROM), complications, and revisions. Radiographs were analyzed for signs of loosening or mechanical failure.ResultsMean age for all patients was 71.7 (61-82) years, and the mean follow-up was 2.7 (2.0-5.5) years. Preoperatively, the groups were similar in almost every functional preoperative category, with no differences in gender, laterality, age, preoperative narcotic use, body mass index, or other co-morbidities. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found regarding VAS pain, ASES, ROM, strength, complication rate, revision rate, narcotic use, implant loosening, or mechanical failure; both groups showed significant improvements in all categories measured.ConclusionsRTSA provides reliably good functional and radiographic outcomes with low complication rates in indicated patients, regardless of the preoperative status of the rotator cuff.Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Comparative Study     

Clinical outcomes of upper extremity ambulators post-reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundPatients requiring upper extremity assist devices such as canes, walkers, and wheelchairs have shown an increased incidence of rotator cuff tears (RCTs), distal clavicle osteolysis, and osteoarthritis. The frequent combination of glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy makes reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) an attractive option in treating the shoulder pathology in these patients. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the rTSA procedure for treatment of shoulder pathology in the upper extremity ambulator population, and what role preoperative functional status plays on outcomes.MethodsThe study involved a retrospective analysis of 30 upper extremity ambulator patients (ages 48-88, average = 72.54 years) who underwent a rTSA procedure performed by the senior author (S.G.) in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Of these 30, 5 patients received bilateral rTSAs, for a total of 35 procedures. Average follow-up for these patients was 32 months, (range 24-84 months). The following preoperative and postoperative characteristics were recorded for each patient: range of motion, Visual Analog Scale scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant Murley scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA analysis.ResultsAverage Visual Analog Scale scores improved from 6.40 to 2.08 (gain = 4.362; P< .0001). Average forward flexion improved from 70.32° to 127.74° (gain = 57.42°; P < .0001), while average abduction improved from 41.79° to 110.18° (gain = 68.69°; P = .0002). Average Murley scores improved from 25.68 to 63.32 (gain = 37.64; P = .030). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores were not shown to be statistically significant, though patients showed a trend toward gains in these metrics. A patient's preoperative status was highly correlated with their expected gain in function postoperatively, with lower baseline preoperative function correlating to larger gains postoperatively. Patients showed statistically significant gains in the metrics listed above, regardless of preoperative diabetic status, opioid use, or the type of ambulatory assistive device used.ConclusionThis study shows that rTSA reliably leads to significant postoperative improvements in range of motion, function, and pain relief in the upper extremity ambulator population. Patients with lower preoperative scores showed overall higher gains in both pain and function postoperatively, ultimately leading to similar postoperative outcomes to those who started at a high baseline function. These gains were irrespective of a patient's other preoperative characteristics, including diagnosis of diabetes, preoperative opioid use, and the type of upper extremity assist device used.Level of evidenceLevel III.     

Degenerative changes of the deltoid muscle have impact on clinical outcome after reversed total shoulder arthroplasty

Introduction  

Despite a high complication rate, subjective and objective results of reversed shoulder arthroplasty for severe rotator cuff lesions associated with osteoarthritis, fracture sequelae, or revision of hemiarthroplasty are favorable. However, whether the changes in biomechanics of the joint may lead to structural changes in the remaining rotator cuff and the deltoid muscle, and may thereby alter the clinical result, has rarely been described. This study investigates the context between postoperative fatty infiltration of the remaining rotator cuff and the deltoid muscle, and the clinical outcome after reversed shoulder arthroplasty.     

Therapeutic outcomes of muscular advancement by an arthroscopic-assisted modified Debeyre-Patte procedure for irreparable large and massive rotator cuff tears

Background

In cases of the large or massive rotator cuff tears, retear rates after rotator cuff repairs remain high. We introduced an arthroscopic-assisted modified Debeyre-Patte procedure which enables to decrease the tension of torn rotator cuff by sliding supraspinatus and infraspinatus laterally keeping fascia connection to the rhomboids.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis

BACKGROUND: Outcomes assessment after the treatment of shoulder disorders has involved the use of various condition-specific outcome instruments. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness to change were determined for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scale within subsets of an overall study population of 455 patients with shoulder instability, 474 patients with rotator cuff disease, and 137 patients with glenohumeral arthritis. RESULTS: There was acceptable test-retest reliability for the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scale (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94) and ten of eleven domains. There was acceptable internal consistency for patients with instability (Cronbach alpha = 0.61), rotator cuff disease (0.64), and arthritis (0.62). There were acceptable floor and ceiling effects for patients with instability (0% and 1.3%, respectively), rotator cuff disease (0% for both), and arthritis (0% for both). There was acceptable and appropriate criterion validity, with significant correlations (p < 0.05) between the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale and the physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain domains of the Short Form-12 scale, and nonsignificant correlations (p > 0.05) with the role-emotional, mental health, vitality, and social function domains. There was acceptable construct validity, with all twenty-three hypotheses demonstrating significance (p < 0.05), and acceptable responsiveness to change for patients with instability (standardized response mean, 0.93), rotator cuff disease (1.16), and arthritis (1.11). CONCLUSIONS: The use of outcome instruments with psychometric properties that have been vigorously established is essential. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale demonstrated overall acceptable psychometric performance for outcomes assessment in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.