Fluconazole bioequivalence study: quantification by tandem mass spectrometry

To develop a new method for quantifying fluoconazole in human plasma and to compare the bioavailability of two fluconazole capsule formulations, an open, randomized, two-period crossover study with a one-week washout interval was conducted in 24 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were obtained up to 168 hours after drug administration and the serum fluconazole concentrations were analyzed using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography using multiple reaction monitoring mode. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluconazole after the administration of each formulation included the Area under the curve (AUC)(0-168h), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Cmax/AUC(0-168h), Tmax, elimination rate constant (Ke), and half-life (T1/2). Within- and between-run imprecision was less than 2.3% and 8.2%, respectively. Inaccuracy within and between runs was -1.5% and -9.7%, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters for bioequivalence showed a normal distribution, and the variance of AUC(0-168h), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax were homoscedastic. The geometric mean for the Fluconal/Zoltec (Fluconal; Libbs Farmacêutica Ltda, S?o Paulo, Brazil; Zoltec; Laboratórios Pfizer Ltda., S?o Paulo, Brazil) individual percent ratio was 94.9% for AUC(0-168h), 94.7% for AUC(0-infinity), 80.1% for Cmax, 102.6% for Ke, 97.5% for T1/2, and 0.93 for Tmax (arithmetic mean of individual differences). We have developed a method in which liquid chromatography is coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry to improve the pharmacokinetic analysis of fluconazole. Because the 90% CI AUC is within the interval proposed for the Food and Drug Administration, we concluded that Fluconal is bioequivalent to Zoltec in terms of absorption. The CV was 27.5% for the Cmax parameter, indicating that fluconazole's absorption rate is highly variable. The European Union Regulatory Agency accepts an interval of 70-143%, and because the 90% CI for Cmax is within the interval proposed for the European Union agency, we conclude that Fluconal is bioequivalent to Zoltec for the rate of absorption.     

Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of bromazepam in healthy volunteers.

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of two bromazepam (CAS 1812-30-2) formulations in 24 healthy volunteers. An open, randomised clinical trial designed as two-period crossover with 14-day washout between doses was employed. Plasma samples for assessments of their bromazepam concentration by HPLC-UV were obtained over 96 h after administration. No adverse effect was reported for any of the formulations administered. The following pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated: AUC(0-96 h), AUCinf, Cmax, Tmax, Ke and T1/2. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the mean test/reference individual ratios were 81-109 for AUC and 84-116 for Cmax. Since the 90% CI for both, AUC and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it is concluded that the new bromazepam slow-release formulation is therapeutic equivalent to the conventional formulation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Comparative bioavailability of two different diclofenac formulations in healthy volunteers

The aim of the study was to assess the bioequivalence of two different diclofenac (CAS 15307-86-5) formulations (diclofenac free acid suspension as test formulation and diclofenac resinate suspension, Cataflam, as reference formulation) in 24 healthy volunteers. After an overnight fast, the volunteers received a single oral dose (50 mg) of each formulation, following an open, randomized, two-period crossover design, with a fourteen-day washout interval between doses. Serum samples were obtained over a 24-h interval post-dosing, and were analysed for their diclofenac content by HPLC-UV. No adverse effect was reported for any of the formulations administered. Geometric mean test/reference individual ratios were: 92.8% for AUC(0-24 h), 93.2% for AUC(0-infinity), 117.2% for Cmax, 131.0% for Ke and 76.2% for T1/2. The variability of Cmax parameter expressed as CV was greater than 25%. Since the 90% CI for AUC(0-24 h) mean ratio were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it can be concluded that diclofenac free acid formulation is bioequivalent to diclofenac resinate formulation for the extent of absorption. Since the European Community Agency accepts a 90% CI for Cmax of 70-143%, it can be concluded that diclofenac free acid formulation is bioequivalent to diclofenac resinate formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Bioequivalence of two lamivudine tablet formulations

The present study describes the determination of the bioavailability of a new commercial tablet formulation of lamivudine (CAS 134678-17-4) compared with a reference formulation. The comparative bioequivalence of the test and a reference formulation (each 3 x 150 mg) was assessed in 24 healthy volunteers by means of a randomized two-way crossover design. Prior to the study both the test and reference formulations were examined for conformation to chromatographic purity and drug content. Each volunteer received the test (T) and the reference formulation (R) with a one-week drug-free interval between administrations. The plasma concentrations of T were monitored over a period of 12 h after drug administration using a sensitive HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters for T were determined from plasma concentration-time data. Statistical tests were carried out at 90% confidence intervals using a parametric method (three-way ANOVA) for AUC and Cmax, and non-parametric method for Tmax. The present study showed that both formulations were bioequivalent for the geometric mean of AUC(0-12), AUC0-infinity), Cmax, and Tmax at the 90% confidence interval. The bioavailability of the test (%) was 96.7, 93.3, 99.7, 100.3, respectively. The T:R ratio was, in each case, well within the acceptable range of 100 +/- 20%.     

Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers

Triflusal (CAS 322-79-2) is an antiplatelet agent related to salicylates used in several European and Latin American countries in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the bioequivalence of triflusal derived from two preparations using both parent drug and metabolite pharmacokinetic data. The bioavailabolity was measured in 24 healthy male Caucasian volunteers following a single oral dose (600 mg) of the test or reference products in the fasting state. Blood samples were collected for 120 h. Plasma concentrations of triflusal and its metabolite 3-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid (HTB) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and fluorescence detection, respectively. The non-compartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity were tested for bioequivalence using ANOVA and Schuirmann's two-one sided t-test. Tmax was analyzed by nonparametric pharmacokinetic parameters of triflusal and HTB derived from the two formulations were nearly consistent with previous observations. Triflusal parameters derived from the test and reference drug were as follows: Cmax (16.85 +/- 11.41 vs 14.48 +/- 7.22 mg/l), AUC0-t (18.43 +/- 10.91 vs 16.22 +/- 7.58 mg/l per hour), Tmax (1 range 0.25-2h vs 0.875 range 0.25-1.5 h), and t(1/2) (0.49 +/- 00.27 vs 0.76 +/- 0.64). HTB parameters after test and reference formulation administration were as follows: Cmax (68.13 +/- 23.05 vs 65.51 +/- 19.44 mg/l), AUC0-t (2748.18 +/- 971.91 vs 2877.97 +/- 881.2 h x mg/l), AUC0-infinity (3350.15 +/- 1182.62 vs 3372.49 +/- 1110.35 h x mg/l), Tmax (2 range 1-10 h vs 2 range 0.75-12 h), and t(1/2) (42.19 +/- 7.82 vs 43.13 +/- 6.56 h). 90% of confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of Cmax AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity derived from both triflusal and HTB were found within the range of 80%-125% acceptable for bioequivalence. No significant difference was found between the Tmax values for triflusal and HTB. It was concluded that the two preparations are bioequivalent and may be prescribed interchangeably.     

Fluoxetine bioequivalence study: quantification of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

In this study, the authors assessed the bioequivalence of two fluoxetine tablet formulations in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single 20 mg dose of each fluoxetine formulation, and a new sensitive method for the quantification of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in human plasma was developed. The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 4-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained over a 672-hour period. Plasma fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations were analyzed by combined liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using selected ion recording (SIR). Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test, histograms, probit plots, and the correlation between norfluoxetine AUC(0-infinity) and fluoxetine AUC(0-infinity) were used to analyze the population distribution. The limit of quantification was 0.15 ng.ml-1 and 0.50 ng.ml-1 for both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, respectively. Within- and between-run imprecision was less than 13% and 17%, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine after the administration of each formulation included AUC(0-672 h), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Cmax/AUC(0-672 h), tmax, t1/2, and Ke. The AUC values for fluoxetine were not consistent with a normal distribution, reflecting the existence of two different populations (poor and extensive metabolizers). The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for extensive fluoxetine metabolizers were 27.0 ng ml-1 for Cmax, 2064.0 ng h ml-1 for AUC(0-infinity), and 85.4 h t1/2. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for norfluoxetine (in extensive metabolizers only) were 2532.0 ng h ml-1 for AUC(0-infinity) and 8.4 ng ml-1 for Cmax. For fluoxetine bioequivalence, the 90% CI of the individual ratio geometric mean for Psiquial/Prozac (including both extensive and poor metabolizers) was 101.6% to 121.1% for AUC(0-672 h) and 86.1% to 102.6% for Cmax. For norfluoxetine, the 90% CI of the individual ratio geometric mean for Psiquial/Prozac (including both extensive and poor metabolizers) was 90.3% to 108.3% for AUC(0-672 h) and 84.5% to 106.3% for Cmax. The new method developed (LC-MS) presented high sensitivity, specificity, and short chromatographic run for the quantification of both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in human plasma. Since both 90% CI for AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios were included in the 80% to 125% interval proposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Psiquial was considered bioequivalent to Prozac according to both the rate and extent of absorption. The finding that there were no significant differences in the bioequivalence assessed by either fluoxetine or norfluoxetine pharmacokinetic parameters indicates that future bioequivalence trials may be performed by quantifying fluoxetine only.     

Comparison of two microemulsion of cyclosporine A in healthy volunteers

This study evaluated the bioequivalence of a new Cyclosporine A microemulsion formulation in comparison to the reference market standard. Twenty-four adult healthy volunteers were randomised to receive the two Cyclosporin A microemulsion formulations, at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg, according to a cross-over design. Blood samples were taken before drug administration and at 12 points within 24 hours. Cyclosporine A whole blood concentrations were determined by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity were calculated by the trapezoidal rule, Cmax and Tmax were obtained directly from blood data. AUCs and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log transformation of data, differences for Tmax were evaluated by the rank test of Wilcoxon for paired data. The 90% confidence interval ratio between tested/reference drug was 0.98 for AUC0-t, 0.96 for AUC0-infinity and 1.01 for Cmax. All of them were within the range of bioequivalence. Tmax was 1.60 +/- 0.44 hours after test drug and 1.67 +/- 0.48 after reference drug (p = 0.27, Wilcoxon test). According to these results the two Cyclosporine A microemulsion formulations can be considered bioequivalent.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two preparations of letrozole in healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new letrozole (CAS 112809-51-5) preparation was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 25 healthy volunteers, aged between 18 and 33. A single dose of 2.5 mg was given orally in the fasted state, using a randomized two-way, cross-over protocol. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Blood samples were obtained at regular time intervals, until 312 h after drug administration. After solid phase extraction (SPE) letrozole plasma levels were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography that was validated before the start of the study (UV detector, fluoroletrozole as an internal standard). The limit of quantification was 1.4 nmol/ml. The following pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated from letrozole plasma concentrations: AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t), Cmax, tmax, F(rel), MRT, t(1/2), k(el). The confidence intervals for the statistical calculations of AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, tmax were 95 % and AUC(0-t), MRT, t(1/2), k(el) were tested by means of the unpaired t-tests procedure and after logarithmic transformation for overall significant differences using analysis of variance--three-way ANOVA. The AUC(0-infinity) ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 99.52 %, and 94.05-107.31%, respectively. The Cmax ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 89.18 %, and 84.48-98.60%, respectively. AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios (90 % CI) were within the 80-125 % interval required for bioequivalence as stipulated in the current international regulations of the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products and the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is concluded that the new letrozole preparation is therapeutically equivalent to the reference preparation for both the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

The bioequivalence study of folifer-Z: a new formulation of sustained-release iron and zinc

The bioequivalence of Folifer-Z tablets, a new sustained-release iron and zinc formulation was evaluated and compared to that of Fefol-Z capsules in 30 healthy male subjects. Each subject received a single oral dose of either product according to a randomized two-way crossover design. A washout period of 1 week was allowed after each treatment. Blood samples were obtained over a 24-h period, and iron and zinc concentrations were measured. The pharmacokinetic parameters of Folifer-Z were Cmax (103 +/- 46.2 micrograms/dl), Tmax (5.93 +/- 2.94 h) and AUC0-24 h (1937 +/- 706 micrograms/dl per h), whereas the corresponding Fefol-Z values were Cmax (109 +/- 41.5 micrograms/dl), Tmax (6.64 +/- 2.54) and AUC0-24 h (1865 +/- 699 micrograms/h per dl). Analysis of variance on log-transformed data for Cmax and AUC0-24 h revealed lack of significant differences among the two formulations. The mean relative bioavailability of AUCtest/AUCreference was 1.07 (90% confidence interval range: 99-115%) and for Cmax test/Cmax reference was 0.96 (90% confidence interval range: 88-105%). Regarding the zinc results, the pharmacokinetic parameters of Folifer-Z values were Cmax (101 +/- 20.7 micrograms/dl), Tmax (4.86 +/- 1.53 h) and AUC0-24 h (1944 +/- 202 micrograms/h per dl), while the corresponding Fefol-Z values were Cmax (102 +/- 20.7), Tmax (4.93 +/- 1.51) and AUC0-24 h (1953 +/- 200). Analysis of variance on log-transformed zinc data for Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-24 h revealed lack of significant difference among the two formulations. The mean relative bioavailability of AUCtest/AUCreference was 0.98 (90% confidence interval range; 95-101%) and for Cmax test/Cmax reference was 0.92 (90% confidence interval range: 89-96%). The results also indicate a possible inhibition of zinc absorption by iron content of both formulations. It is concluded that Folifer-Z product is bioequivalent to Fefol-Z product.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Prediction of steady-state bioequivalence relationships using single dose data I-linear kinetics

Simulated data using a linear one- and two-compartment body model with different absorption characteristics were used to evaluate the ability of single dose bioavailability data to predict the relationships that exist at steady state. This was done by comparing the confidence intervals obtained from single and multiple dose data sets for the parameters of Tmax, Cmax, and area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity). As a consequence of Tmax and Cmax decreasing and increasing from single to multiple dosing regimens, the confidence intervals for these parameters reflected these changes. The 90 per cent confidence interval expressed as a percentage of the reference mean increased or decreased for Tmax dependent upon the ratio of Ka test/Ka reference, and decreased for Cmax while the interval for AUC0-infinity exhibited no predictable pattern and appeared to be influenced by the amount of error in the data set. Alteration of either the dosing interval or the fraction absorbed did not affect the pattern of change in the confidence intervals for Tmax and Cmax, but the latter did result in a decrease in the interval for AUC0-infinity. Analysis of the confidence intervals for Tmax, Cmax and AUC0-infinity in bioequivalency studies for quinidine gluconate and procainamide hydrochloride following administration of single and multiple doses to different subjects appeared to be consistent with the patterns observed for the simulated data sets.     

Bioequivalence study of generic gliclazide and Diamicron formulations in healthy Thai male volunteers

The objective of this study was to compare the bioequivalence of 80 mg gliclazide in healthy Thai males. A single dose of each preparation was administered after an overnight fast in a 2-period crossover design with a 2-week washout period. Serial blood samples were collected over a period of 60 hours. Plasma gliclazide concentrations were determined using HPLC and the pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental analysis. Results: The median time to reach the maximal concentration (Tmax) for the test formulation was identical to that of the reference Diamicron (11.5 h). Similarly, the mean elimination half-lives (t1/2) for the test (20.4 +/- 7.8 h) and Diamicron (21.5 +/- 9.4 h) were comparable. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmic transformations of AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax as well as non-transformed Tmax. The mean (90% CI) of the difference in Tmax (h) was 0.08 ((-1.44)-1.61). The mean (90% CI) of the AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios for (test/reference) were 1.08 (0.98-1.18) and 1.09 (0.89-1.34), respectively. Since these values fall within the bioequivalence criteria, our study demonstrates bioequivalence of the 2 products.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two digoxin formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two formulations of digoxin (CAS 20830-75-5) were assessed in this paper. The study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study design with a wash-out phase of 14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose and digoxin plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. Based on the plasma concentration-time data of each individual during two periods, pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity and t1/2, were calculated by applying noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to evaluate bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration, the values of Cmax Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity for test and reference formulations were 2.61 +/- 0.98 and 2.68 +/- 1.09 ng/ mL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 h, 27.94 +/- 3.14 and 27.56 +/- 3.86 h, 28.57 +/- 4.99 and 28.77 +/- 6.53 ng x h/mL, 33.44 +/- 4.85 and 33.63 +/- 7.57 ng x h/mL, respectively. Both primary target parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative bioavailabilities were 102.5 +/- 19.2% for AUC0-infinity, 102.0 +/- 19.3% for AUC0-tau. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%, which means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of digoxin.     

Bioequivalence of two oral ciprofloxacin tablets formulations

The relative bioavailability of a new 750 mg tablet formulation of ciprofloxacin (test formulation supplied by Dr. August Wolff GmbH and Co., Germany) was compared with that of Ciprobay tablets 750 mg (reference formulation from Bayer Vital GmbH and Co., Germany). Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 male and 12 female) were included in this single-dose, 2-sequence, crossover randomized study. Blood samples were obtained prior to dosing and at 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 and 30 hours after drug administration. Plasma concentrations of ciprofloxacin were determined by HPLC. No differences were found when the in vitro dissolution profiles of both formulations were compared. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data, and ratios of tmax were evaluated nonparametrically. The parametric analysis revealed the following mean values for the test/reference ratios (90% standard confidence intervals in parenthesis (ln-transformed data): 1.01 (0.95-1.07) for AUC(0-t), 0.99 (0.93-1.05) for AUC(0-infinity), 1.05 (0.97-1.14) for Cmax and 1.06 (0.97-1.15) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The nonparametric confidence interval for tmax was 0.77-1.15. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations as their confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 0.80-1.25 limits; the 90% confidence interval for tmax slightly exceeded limits of bioequivalence. We conclude that both formulations show bioequivalence for both the rate and the extent of absorption.     

Comparative bioavailability study of doxycycline hyclate (equivalent to 100 mg doxycycline) capsules (doxycin vs vibramycin) for bioequivalence evaluation in healthy adult volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new capsule formulation of doxycycline (100 mg), doxycin, relative to the reference product, vibramycin (100 mg) capsules. The bioavailability was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose (100 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a 2-week washout period. A randomized, balanced 2-way cross-over design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of doxycycline were analyzed by a sensitive and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for doxycycline were determined using standard noncompartmental methods. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, K(el), t(1/2) and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80-125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis of the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 95.98-109.56%, 92.21 to 107.66%, 93.90-112.56%, and 96.0 to 106.91% respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) by the Schuirmann's two 1-sided t-tests. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Comparative bioavailability of two immediate-release tablets of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers

AIM: Two formulations of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide (20 mg/12.5 mg) were evaluated for bioequivalence after single dosing in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study was conducted according to an open, randomized, 2-period crossover design with a 2-week washout interval between doses. Twenty-four volunteers participated and all completed the study successfully. Lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide were determined in plasma by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after logarithmic transformation of data and ratios of tmax were evaluated non-parametrically. RESULTS: For lisinopril, the parametric analysis revealed the following test/reference ratios and their confidence intervals (90% CI): 1.01 (0.84-1.22) for AUC(0-t), 0.98 (0.81-1.19) for AUC(0-infinity), 1.02 (0.83-1.25) for Cmax and 1.03 (0.99-1.08) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CI for tmax was 0.94-1.07. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations. As for hydrochlorothiazide, test/reference ratios and their confidence intervals (90% CI) were: 1.05 (0.95-1.17), 1.02 (0.93-1.12) for AUC(0-infinity), 0.99 (0.89-1.07) for Cmax and 0.97 (0.90-1.04) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CI for tmax was 1.00-1.41. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations except for tmax. A discrete fall in both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was observed after drug administration. The time course of both parameters was similar for the 2 formulations. Heart rates also followed a similar time profile. CONCLUSIONS: The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide was demonstrated.     

Comparative bioavailability study of cefixime (equivalent to 100 mg/5 ml) suspension (Winex vs Suprax) in healthy male volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new suspension formulation of cefixime (100 mg/5 ml), Winex, relative to the reference product, Suprax (100 mg/5 ml) suspension. The bio-availability study was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose (200 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products on 2 treatment days after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. A randomized, balanced two-way crossover design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 16 hours. Plasma concentrations of cefixime were analyzed using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime were determined using standard non-compartmental method. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Kel, t1/2 and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using raw and log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pnfinity harmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80 - 125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 88.93 - 107.10%, 89.09 - 107.11%, 89.63 - 108.58% and 96.85 - 105.29%, respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax using the Schuirmann's two one-sided t-tests. Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence study of tramadol by intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers

Tramadol hydrochloride (CAS 36282-47-0) is a centrally acting analgesic agent binding to mu opiate receptors. The bioavailability of a new tramadol hydrochloride injection (Limadol) was compared with a commercially available reference product by intramuscular administration in twelve healthy Chinese male volunteers by a standard two-way cross-over trial. Each volunteer received a single 100 mg injection of tramadol HCl in each phase. The bioavailability was compared using the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 30 h (AUC0-30), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-infinity), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (Tmax). No statistically significant difference was observed between the Tmax, Cmax, AUC0-30 and AUC0-infinity of the two preparations. It is concluded that test and reference formulations of tramadol hydrochloride are bioequivalent for both the extent and rate of absorption after a single intramuscular injection.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two cefixime formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new cefixime ((6R,7R)-7-[(Z)-2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-2-(carboxymethoxyimino) acetamido]-8-oxo-3-vinyl-5-thia-1-azabicyclo-[4,2,0]-oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, CAS 79350-37-1) tablet preparation (Loprax) was compared with that of a reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers. The trial was designed as an open, randomized, single-blind, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 400 mg cefixime tablet as a test or reference formulation on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. The plasma concentrations of the drug were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-24h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. The mean AUC0-infinity of cefixime was 45008.7 +/- 10989.9 and 45221.3 +/- 2155.7 n x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of cefixime was on average 4746.9 +/- 1284 ng/ml for the test and 4726.3 +/- 1206.9 ng/ml for the reference product. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for test and reference tablets. The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of Cmax, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-24h of cefixime were in the bioequivalence range (94%-112%). Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.