Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether there is a difference in the rate of symptomatic uterine rupture after a trial of labor in women who have had 1 versus 2 prior cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of all women with a history of either 1 or 2 prior cesarean deliveries who elected to undergo a trial of labor during a 12-year period (July 1984-June 1996) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital were reviewed. Rates of uterine rupture were compared for these 2 groups. Potential confounding variables were controlled by using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Women with 1 prior cesarean delivery (n = 3757) had a rate of uterine rupture of 0.8%, whereas women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries (n = 134) had a rate of uterine rupture of 3.7% (P =.001). In a logistic regression analysis that was controlled for maternal age, use of epidural analgesia, oxytocin induction, oxytocin augmentation, the use of prostaglandin E(2) gel, birth weight, gestational age, type of prior hysterotomy, year of trial of labor, and prior vaginal delivery, the odds ratio for uterine rupture in those patients with 2 prior cesarean deliveries was 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-13. 2) CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of 2 prior cesarean deliveries have an almost 5-fold greater risk of uterine rupture than those with only 1 prior cesarean delivery.     

Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the rates of uterine rupture during induced trials of labor after previous cesarean delivery with the rates during a spontaneous trial of labor. STUDY DESIGN: All deliveries between 1992 and 1998 among women with previous cesarean delivery were evaluated. Rates of uterine rupture were determined for spontaneous labor and different methods of induction. RESULTS: Of 2119 trials of labor, 575 (27%) were induced. The overall rate of uterine rupture was 0.71% (15/2119). The uterine rupture rate with induced trial of labor (8/575; 1.4%) was significantly higher than with a spontaneous trial of labor (7/1544; 0.45%; P =.0004). Uterine rupture rates associated with different methods of induction were compared with the rate seen with spontaneous labor and were as follows: prostaglandin E(2) gel, 2.9% (5/172; P =.004); intracervical Foley catheter, 0.76% (1/129; P =.47); and labor induction not requiring cervical ripening, 0.74% (2/274; P =.63). The uterine rupture rate associated with inductions other than with prostaglandin E(2) was 0.74% (3/474; P =.38). The relative risk of uterine rupture with prostaglandin E(2) use versus spontaneous trial of labor was 6.41 (95% confidence interval, 2. 06-19.98). CONCLUSION: Induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture among women with a previous cesarean delivery, and this association was highest when prostaglandin E(2) gel was used.     

Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with uterine rupture in patients undergoing a trial of labor with a history of previous cesarean delivery in which labor was induced with misoprostol. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was used to select patients who underwent induction of labor with misoprostol during the period from February 1999 to June 2002. Women with a history of cesarean delivery were retrospectively compared with those without uterine scarring. RESULTS: Uterine rupture occurred in 4 of 41 patients with previous cesarean delivery who had labor induced with misoprostol. The rate of uterine rupture (9.7%) was significantly higher in patients with a previous cesarean delivery (P<0.001). No uterine rupture occurred in 50 patients without uterine scarring. Women with a history of cesarean delivery were more likely to have oxytocin augmentation than those without uterine scarring (41% versus 20%; P=0.037). CONCLUSION: Misoprostol induction of labor increases the risk of uterine rupture in women with a history of cesarean delivery.     

Induction of labor: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of uterine rupture between a cohort of women with previous low-transverse cesarean section (CS) and a cohort with intact uterus. METHODS: All women with a singleton pregnancy and previous low-transverse CS requiring induction of labor from January 1, 1992 to December 30, 2001 (n = 310) were compared with a cohort of women with intact uterus undergoing induction of labor during the same study period (n = 5420). Protocols of induction using prostaglandin E2 gel and oxytocin infusion were consistent within groups, but differed between the previous CS and the intact uterus group. RESULTS: Uterine rupture occurred in 0.3% in the previous CS group vs. 0.03% in the intact uterus group (p = 0.37). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in rate of uterine rupture between the previous CS vs. intact uterus group (p = 0.16) after controlling for maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, Bishop score on admission, use of prostaglandin and oxytocin, and birth weight. Our study had adequate power to detect a 0.38% difference in rate of uterine rupture between the two groups (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Induction of labor is not associated with significantly higher rates of uterine rupture among women with previous low-transverse CS compared with women with intact uterus provided a consistent protocol with strict intervention criteria is adopted.     

Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of prior vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture in pregnant women undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of all pregnant women with a history of cesarean delivery who attempted a trial of labor during a 12-year period at a single center were reviewed. For the current analysis, the study population was limited to term pregnancies. The effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor was evaluated. Separate analyses were performed for women with a single previous cesarean delivery and for those with >1 prior cesarean delivery. For each of these subgroups, the rate of uterine rupture among women who had > or =1 prior vaginal delivery was compared with the rate among women with no prior vaginal delivery. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations with control for confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 3783 women with 1 prior scar, 1021 (27.0%) also had > or =1 prior vaginal delivery. During a subsequent trial of labor, the rate of uterine rupture was 1.1% among pregnant women without prior vaginal delivery and 0.2% among pregnant women with prior vaginal delivery (P =.01). Logistic regression analysis controlling for duration of labor, induction, birth weight, maternal age, year of birth, epidural analgesia, and oxytocin augmentation indicated that, among women with a single scar, those with a prior vaginal delivery had a risk of uterine rupture that was one fifth that of women without a previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.8). In the group of 143 pregnant women with >1 previous cesarean delivery, women with a prior vaginal delivery had a somewhat lower risk of uterine rupture (3.9% vs 2.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-6.7). This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Among women with 1 prior cesarean delivery undergoing a subsequent trial of labor, those with a prior vaginal delivery were at substantially lower risk of uterine rupture than women without a previous vaginal delivery.     

Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between uterine rupture and oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean. METHODS: A case-control study was performed. Cases were all women with uterine ruptures who received oxytocin during a trial of labor after a single cesarean delivery within a 12-year period (n = 24). Four controls undergoing trial of labor after a single cesarean delivery were matched to each case by 500 g birth weight category, year of birth, and by induction or augmentation (n = 96). The study had an 80% power to detect a 40% increase in oxytocin duration or a 65% increase in total oxytocin dose. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in initial oxytocin dose, maximum dose, or time to maximum dose. Although women with uterine ruptures had higher exposure to oxytocin as measured by mean total oxytocin dose (544 mU higher) and oxytocin duration (54 minutes longer), these differences were not statistically significant. Women with uterine rupture who received oxytocin were more likely to have experienced an episode of uterine hyperstimulation (37.5% compared with 20.8%, P =.05). However, the positive predictive value of hyperstimulation for uterine rupture was only 2.8%. CONCLUSION: Although no significant differences in exposure to oxytocin were detected between cases of uterine rupture and controls, the rarity of uterine rupture limited our power to detect small differences in exposure. In women receiving oxytocin, uterine rupture is associated with an increase in uterine hyperstimulation, but the clinical value of hyperstimulation for predicting uterine rupture is limited.     

Uterine rupture and dehiscence associated with intravaginal misoprostol cervical ripening

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol, when used as an agent for cervical ripening, is associated with uterine rupture. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a two-year retrospective chart review to determine the incidence of uterine rupture in patients with a previous cesarean delivery undergoing cervical ripening or the induction of labor. RESULTS: Uterine dehiscence occurred in 1 and uterine rupture occurred in 3 of 48 women with a prior cesarean delivery treated with 50 micrograms doses of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening. Uterine rupture was found in 1 of 89 women who had an oxytocin infusion for induction of labor and none of the 24 patients who received intravaginal prostaglandin E2 placed for cervical ripening. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol appears to be associated with an increased incidence of uterine rupture when used in patients undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean.     

Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the rate of uterine rupture in patients with a previous cesarean delivery is related to labor induction and/or cervical ripening using transcervical Foley catheter. METHODS: Charts of all patients who had a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery in our institution between 1988 and 2002 were reviewed. The rates of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and uterine rupture in patients with spontaneous labor (control group) were compared with those of patients who underwent a labor induction by means of amniotomy with or without oxytocin and patients who underwent a labor induction/cervical ripening using a transcervical Foley catheter. Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 2479 patients, 1807 had a spontaneous labor, 417 had labor induced by amniotomy with or without oxytocin, and 255 had labor induced by using transcervical Foley catheter. The rate of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was significantly different among the groups (78.0% versus 77.9% versus 55.7%, P <.001), but not the rate of uterine rupture (1.1% versus 1.2% versus 1.6%, P =.81). After adjusting for confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) for successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41, 1.15), and the OR for uterine rupture was 0.47 (95% CI 0.06, 3.59) in patients who underwent an induction of labor using a transcervical Foley catheter when compared with patients with spontaneous labor. CONCLUSION: Labor induction using a transcervical Foley catheter was not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture.     

Risk factors for symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor: the 1990s

The purpose of this study is to identify pregnancy and labor factors that place women at increased risk for symptomatic uterine rupture during trial of labor following cesarean section. The study population consisted of 16 women with uterine rupture after a trial of labor who were compared with 32 women without uterine rupture after a trial of labor. Using a case-control study design with a 1:2 match, we examined risk factors that might be associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. Cases were more likely to have an induction of labor with the use of oxytocin and/or amniotomy (56 vs. 34%) and more likely to undergo augmentation with oxytocin (25 vs. 19%) in comparison with controls. In addition, cases were more likely to be given oxytocin (for either induction or augmentation) (75 vs. 50%) and cervical ripening agents (31 vs. 9%) versus controls. Neonates born after uterine rupture had a higher rate of significant acidosis (pH < 7.0, 57 vs. 0%, p = 0.0002) and lower Apgar scores. There was a significantly higher risk of maternal infection (36 vs. 3%, p = 0.003), transfusion (13 vs. 0%, p = 0.03), and longer length of stay in patients with uterine rupture. There is a trend for increased use of augmentation and induction agents to be associated with uterine rupture. Serious maternal and fetal morbidities are increased following uterine rupture.     

Minimum oxytocin dose requirement after cesarean delivery for labor arrest

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the minimum effective intravenous dose of oxytocin required for adequate uterine contraction after cesarean delivery for labor arrest. METHODS: A randomized single-blinded study was undertaken in 30 parturients undergoing cesarean deliveries under epidural anesthesia for labor arrest despite intravenous oxytocin augmentation. Oxytocin was administered as a slow intravenous bolus immediately after delivery of the infant, according to a biased coin up-down sequential allocation scheme. After assisted spontaneous delivery of the placenta, the obstetrician, blinded to the oxytocin dose, assessed uterine contraction as either satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Additional boluses of oxytocin were administered as required, followed by a maintenance infusion. Data were interpreted and analyzed by a logistic regression model at 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: All patients received oxytocin infusions at a mean +/- standard deviation of 9.8 +/- 6.3 hours before cesarean delivery (maximum infusion dose 10.3 +/- 8.2 mU/min). The minimum effective dose of oxytocin required to produce adequate uterine response in 90% of women (ED90) was estimated to be 2.99 IU (95% confidence interval 2.32-3.67). The estimated blood loss was 1,178 +/- 716 mL. CONCLUSION: Women requiring cesarean delivery for labor arrest after oxytocin augmentation require approximately 3 IU rapid intravenous infusion of oxytocin to achieve effective uterine contraction after delivery. This dose is 9 times more than previously reported after elective cesarean delivery in nonlaboring women at term, suggesting oxytocin receptor desensitization from exogenous oxytocin administration during labor. Therefore, alternative uterotonic agents, rather than additional oxytocin, may achieve superior uterine contraction and control of blood loss during cesarean delivery for labor arrest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

Induction of labor: Comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus

Objective. To compare the risk of uterine rupture between a cohort of women with previous low-transverse cesarean section (CS) and a cohort with intact uterus.

Methods. All women with a singleton pregnancy and previous low-transverse CS requiring induction of labor from January 1, 1992 to December 30, 2001 (n = 310) were compared with a cohort of women with intact uterus undergoing induction of labor during the same study period (n = 5420). Protocols of induction using prostaglandin E₂ gel and oxytocin infusion were consistent within groups, but differed between the previous CS and the intact uterus group.

Results. Uterine rupture occurred in 0.3% in the previous CS group vs. 0.03% in the intact uterus group (p = 0.37). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in rate of uterine rupture between the previous CS vs. intact uterus group (p = 0.16) after controlling for maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, Bishop score on admission, use of prostaglandin and oxytocin, and birth weight. Our study had adequate power to detect a 0.38% difference in rate of uterine rupture between the two groups (α = 0.05, β = 0.80).

Conclusion. Induction of labor is not associated with significantly higher rates of uterine rupture among women with previous low-transverse CS compared with women with intact uterus provided a consistent protocol with strict intervention criteria is adopted.     

The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether maternal age is associated with a symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery over a 12-year period. We analyzed the labors of women with one prior cesarean and no prior vaginal deliveries. The uterine rupture rate was determined with respect to maternal age. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Overall, 32 (1.1%) uterine ruptures occurred among 3015 women. For women younger than 30 years, the risk of uterine rupture was 0.5%, and for those women aged at least 30 years, the risk of uterine rupture was 1.4% (P =.02). Controlling for birth weight, induction, augmentation, and interdelivery interval, the odds ratio for symptomatic uterine rupture for women aged at least 30 years compared with those less than 30 years was 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.2, 8.4). CONCLUSION: Women aged 30 years or older have a greater risk of uterine rupture as compared with women younger than 30 years.     

Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture

OBJECTIVE: To relate interdelivery interval to risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all women who had a trial of labor after cesarean delivery over 12 years (July 1984 to June 1996). Analysis was limited to women with only one prior cesarean delivery and no prior vaginal deliveries who delivered term singletons and whose medical records included the month and year of the prior delivery. The time in months between the prior cesarean delivery and the index trial of labor was calculated, and the women were divided accordingly to permit comparison with respect to symptomatic uterine rupture. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred nine women had trials of labor after one prior cesarean delivery and had complete data from the medical records. There were 29 uterine ruptures (1.2%) in the population. For interdelivery intervals up to 18 months, the uterine rupture rate was 2.25% (seven of 311) compared with 1.05% (22 of 2098) with intervals of 19 months or longer (P =.07). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the risk of uterine rupture according to interdelivery interval while controlling for maternal age, public assistance, length of labor, gestational age at least 41 weeks, and oxytocin use. Women with interdelivery intervals of up to 18 months were three times as likely (95% confidence interval, 1.2, 7.2) to have symptomatic uterine rupture. CONCLUSION: Interdelivery intervals of up to 18 months were associated with increased risk of symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean delivery compared with that for longer interdelivery intervals.     

Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum

OBJECTIVE: To generate contemporary uterine activity and labor progress data for oxytocin-augmented labor, and assess whether 2 hours of active phase labor arrest with at least 200 Montevideo units justifies cesarean delivery. METHODS: Five hundred and one consecutive spontaneously laboring term women with abnormally progressive labor were managed by a standardized protocol: oxytocin and intrauterine pressure catheter with an intent to sustain at least 200 Montevideo units for 4 hours or more before cesarean for labor arrest. Uterine activity was measured, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. With a sample of this size, the upper 95% confidence interval limit for an event with an observed rate of 1% is below 3%. RESULTS: During oxytocin augmentation, nulliparas who were delivered vaginally dilated at a median rate of 1.4 cm/hour versus 1.8 cm/hour for parous women. In both groups, the 5th percentile of cervical dilation rate was 0.5 cm/hour. Thirty-eight women experienced labor arrest for over 2 hours despite at least 200 sustained Montevideo units; 23 (61%) achieved a vaginal delivery. Rates of chorioamnionitis and endometritis for the 38 women were 26%. None of their infants sustained a serious complication, including brachial plexus injury, even though three of the 23 vaginal deliveries (13%) were complicated by shoulder dystocia. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that oxytocin-augmented labor proceeds at substantially slower rates than spontaneous labor, and support our previous contention that the criteria of labor arrest for 2 hours, despite at least 200 sustained Montevideo units, are insufficiently rigorous for the performance of cesarean.     

Management of spontaneous rupture of the membranes in the absence of labor in primigravid women at term

One hundred and thirty-five healthy primigravid women at or near term with spontaneous rupture of the membranes without uterine contractions were submitted to a prospective trial of management. Rupture of the membranes was diagnosed by speculum examination. If labor did not commence, induction was performed by oxytocin infusion starting at 9 AM following admission. One hundred and five women went into labor spontaneously before induction became necessary. Sixty-three of these women required augmentation with oxytocin. Twenty-seven percent of the induced group required cesarean section delivery compared to 10% of those in spontaneous labor augmented by oxytocin and to none of those who did not require oxytocin (p less than 0.01). Ninety-four percent of those in spontaneous labor were delivered vaginally compared to 73% of the induced group (p less than 0.01). Forty-one percent of the augmented group were delivered by forceps. Awaiting the spontaneous onset of labor for 24 hours or less did not result in clinical maternal or neonatal infection. We would therefore advocate awaiting the spontaneous onset of labor after spontaneous rupture of membranes without contractions at or near term in healthy primigravid women for up to 24 hours because it seems to confer significant advantages without producing any additional hazard.     

Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study

The use of oxytocin for labor induction or augmentation in patients with previous cesarean delivery is controversial. This paper presents a series of 1776 patients allowed to labor after a previous cesarean section, of whom 485 (27%) were treated with oxytocin. When the patients who received oxytocin were compared with those who did not, no significant differences were found with respect to uterine rupture, maternal morbidity, fetal morbidity, or fetal mortality. We conclude that the judicious use of oxytocin is safe in the patient with a previous low transverse cesarean section.     

Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin induction/augmentation

Uterine contraction pressures were quantified (in Montetevideo units) in 109 women at term gestation who received oxytocin for induction or augmentation of labor and whose labor resulted in a spontaneous vaginal delivery. Newborn five-minute Apgar scores were greater than or equal to 8 in 108 of the 109 neonates, and no immediate neonatal morbidity was attributable to the oxytocin stimulation of labor. Women undergoing oxytocin induction had significantly greater uterine contraction pressures than those with oxytocin augmentation. During oxytocin induction 91% of women achieved at least 200 to 224 Montevideo Units and 40% at least 300 Montevideo units versus 77 and 7.7%, respectively, during augmentation of labor. With concurrent fetal monitoring these levels of uterine activity should be sought before consideration of a cesarean delivery because of presumed cephalopelvic disproportion or failure to progress.     

Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes at term of a trial of labor in women with previous cesarean delivery who delivered neonates weighing > 4000 g versus women with those weighing < or = 4000 g. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed medical records for all women undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery during a 12-year period. The current analysis was limited to women at term with one prior cesarean and no other deliveries. The rates of cesarean delivery and symptomatic uterine rupture for women with infants weighing > 4000 g were compared to the rates for women with infants weighing < or = 4000 g. Logistic regression was used to control for the potential confounding by use of epidural, maternal age, labor induction, labor augmentation, indication for previous cesarean, type of uterine hysterotomy, year of delivery, receiving public assistance, and maternal race. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Of 2749 women, 13% (365) had infants with birth weights > 4000 g. Cesarean delivery rate associated with birth weights < or = 4000 g was 29% versus 40% for those with birth weights > 4000 g (P = .001). With use of logistic regression, we found that birth weight > 4000 g was associated with a 1.7-fold increase in risk of cesarean delivery (95% CI, 1.3-2.2). The rate of uterine rupture for women with infants weighing < or = 4000 g was 1.0% versus a 1.6% rate for those with infants weighing > 4000 g (P = .24). Although the logistic regression analysis revealed a somewhat higher rate of uterine rupture associated with birth weights of > 4000 g (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7-4.1), this difference was not statistically significant. The rate of uterine rupture was 2.4% for women with infants weighing > 4250 g, but this rate did not differ significantly from the rate of uterine rupture associated with birth weights < or = 4250 g (P = .1). CONCLUSION: A trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery may be a reasonable clinical option for pregnant women with suspected birth weights of > 4000 g, given that the rate of uterine rupture associated with these weights does not appear to be substantially increased when compared to lower birth weights. However, some caution may apply when considering a trial of labor in women with infants weighing > 4250 g. In these women with infants weighing > 4000 g, the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery, although lower than for neonates weighing < or = 4000 g, is still 60%.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction

We assessed the rate of uterine rupture in patients undergoing labor induction for attempted vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). A retrospective study was performed of data from a computerized database. Deliveries from January 1, 1998, to June 30, 2001, in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente system were reviewed and various perinatal characteristics analyzed. A total of 16,218 patients had a prior low transverse cesarean section. Of these, 6832 (42.1%) had a trial of labor. Successful VBAC occurred in 86% of patients with spontaneous onset of labor and 66% of patients with labor induction ( p < 0.001). The uterine rupture rate was not different between patients with spontaneous or induced labor (1.0% versus 1.2%, p = 0.51). Similarly, there was no significant difference between oxytocin or prostaglandin E2 induction (1.4% versus 1.0%, p = 0.59). In our study, labor induction did not appear to increase the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting VBAC.     

Predictors of vaginal delivery in patients with a previous cesarean section, who require oxytocin

Prospective analysis of 98 consecutive patients at term pregnancy with one previous cesarean section, who received oxytocin during a trial of labor (34 inductions, 64 augmentations), was undertaken to identify specific factors associated with successful vaginal delivery. The overall vaginal delivery rate was 59.2%. Comparing route of delivery in the induction and augmentation groups separately revealed no significant differences in maternal height, weight, or parity, duration of membrane rupture, length of oxytocin treatment or maximum dose, cervical examination on admission or before oxytocin treatment, or use of conduction anesthesia. A previous vaginal delivery favored repeat vaginal delivery in patients with augmentation while a nonrecurrent indication was significantly associated with vaginal delivery in all patients. After the beginning of oxytocin augmentation, the cervical dilatation rate was 1.82 cm/hr in patients delivered vaginally, compared with 0.18 cm/hr in those requiring cesarean section (p less than 0.001). Any cervical dilatation during the first 2 hours of augmentation was associated with more frequent vaginal delivery: 24 of 40 vaginal deliveries (60%) versus six of 24 cesarean sections (25%, p less than 0.01). Discriminant analysis correctly identified route of delivery in 85.3% of those with induction and 87.5% of patients with augmentation. During a trial of labor, oxytocin induction or augmentation is effective in a majority of patients. Furthermore, an early response during augmentation is of predictive value when such patients are being managed.