The effect of the optimal use of rapid-acting insulin analogues on insulin secretion in Type 2 diabetes

The abnormal glucose tolerance of Type 2 diabetes is characterized by post-prandial hyperglycaemia. We aimed to examine whether the restoration of a more physiological insulin profile using rapid-acting insulin analogues might, through effects on glucose toxicity, improve endogenous insulin secretion rate (ISR) and secondly improve markers of vascular risk. Eighteen people with insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes were recruited into a single centre, cross-over, open-labeled study. The order of pre-meal unmodified human insulin or insulin aspart was randomized: treatment periods lasted at least 8-12 weeks after which ISR was assessed by stepped low-dose glucose infusion and fasting markers of vascular risk measured. Glucose control was good (HbA(1c) 6.94+/-0.12 (+/-S.E.)% versus 7.07+/-0.13%, NS) with insulin aspart and human insulin. Mean post-prandial self-monitored blood glucose concentration was also good particularly with insulin aspart (7.5+/-0.41 mmol/l versus 8.19+/-0.34 mmol/l) but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Over 160 min ISR did not differ between insulin aspart and human insulin and there was also no change in various markers of vascular risk. In conclusion a meal-time+basal insulin regimen gave close to normal post-prandial blood glucose control with both the insulin aspart and human insulin regimens, such that no difference in ISR or markers of vascular risk could be demonstrated.     

Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of insulin aspart, a rapid-acting insulin analogue, with that of unmodified human insulin on long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Prospective, multi-centre, randomized, open-labelled, parallel-group trial lasting 6 months in 88 centres in eight European countries and including 1,070 adult subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Study patients were randomized 2:1 to insulin aspart or unmodified human insulin before main meals, with NPH-insulin as basal insulin. Main outcome measures were blood glucose control as assessed by HbA1c, eight-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, insulin dose, quality of life, hypoglycaemia, and adverse events. RESULTS: After 6 months, insulin aspart was superior to human insulin with respect to HbA1c with a baseline-adjusted difference in HbA1c of 0.12 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.22) %Hb, P < 0.02. Eight-point blood glucose profiles showed lower post-prandial glucose levels (mean baseline-adjusted -0.6 to -1.2 mmol/l, P < 0.01) after all main meals, but higher pre-prandial glucose levels before breakfast and dinner (0.7-0.8 mmol/l, P < 0.01) with insulin aspart. Satisfaction with treatment was significantly better in patients treated with insulin aspart (WHO Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) baseline-adjusted difference 2.3 (1.2-3.3) points, P < 0.001). The relative risk of experiencing a major hypoglycaemic episode with insulin aspart compared to human insulin was 0.83 (0.59-1.18, NS). Major night hypoglycaemic events requiring parenteral treatment were less with insulin aspart (1.3 vs. 3.4% of patients, P < 0.05), as were late post-prandial (4-6 h) events (1.8 vs. 5.0% of patients, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: These results show small but useful advantage for the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin aspart as a tool to improve long-term blood glucose control, hypoglycaemia, and quality of life, in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.     

A randomized trial of insulin aspart with intensified basal NPH insulin supplementation in people with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: Insulin aspart has been shown to improve post-prandial and overall glycaemic control in people with Type 1 diabetes. We hypothesized that insulin aspart with intensified basal NPH insulin supplementation would result in better overall glycaemic control than human regular insulin with standard basal NPH insulin. METHODS: The trial was conducted in 43 centres in seven countries. People with Type 1 diabetes were randomized to mealtime insulin aspart with up to four daily NPH doses if meals were > 5 h apart and a 25% increase in bedtime NPH dose (n = 187), or to mealtime human unmodified insulin with once or twice daily basal NPH insulin (n = 181). Efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12 weeks (primary evaluation period) and 64 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 and 64 weeks there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between the insulin aspart and regular insulin groups: -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23, +0.05)% and -0.14 (-0.32, +0.04)%. Post-prandial glucose values were lower and the area under the 24-h self-monitored blood glucose curve above 7.0 mmol/l was 28% smaller with insulin aspart (35.2 +/- 3.2 vs. 48.9 +/- 3.1 mmol/l h, P = 0.0015). No significant differences were found in mild or severe hypoglycaemia, or adverse event rate. At 64 weeks treatment satisfaction was higher in the insulin aspart group (difference 1.57 (95% CI 0.49, 2.64) points, P = 0.004), while quality of life was not different. CONCLUSIONS: Improved post-prandial glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction with insulin aspart were confirmed. Intensifying basal insulin supplementation resulted in a similar HbA1c decrement as previously found with the use of insulin aspart and standard NPH insulin supplementation. This does not support routinely basal NPH insulin intensification when using rapid-acting insulin analogues in daily practice.     

Twice-daily compared with once-daily insulin glargine in people with Type 1 diabetes using meal-time insulin aspart.

AIM: To compare blood glucose control when using insulin glargine twice daily at breakfast- and dinner-times with insulin glargine once daily at dinner time, in unselected people with Type 1 diabetes using insulin aspart at meal-times. METHODS: In this 8-week, two-way, cross-over study, 20 people with Type 1 diabetes were randomized to insulin glargine injection once daily at dinner-time or twice daily at breakfast- and dinner-times, both plus meal-time insulin aspart. Each 4-week treatment period concluded with a 24-h inpatient metabolic profile. RESULTS: Insulin doses, HbA1c, fructosamine concentration and pre-breakfast self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) concentration did not differ between treatment periods. SMBG concentrations after breakfast, after lunch and before dinner were lower with twice-daily compared with once-daily dinner-time glargine [9.3 +/- 0.5 (+/- se) vs. 6.7 +/- 0.5 mmol/l, P = 0.003; 10.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, P = 0.024; 9.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.5 mmol/l, P = 0.001]. Mean 24-h SMBG concentration was lower with twice-daily glargine (7.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.5 mmol/l, P = 0.031). Within-day variability of SMBG concentration was lower with twice-daily glargine (sd 3.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P = 0.044). Plasma free insulin concentration was higher in the afternoon with twice-daily glargine (21.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 16.1 +/- 1.3 mU/l, P = 0.009), but lower overnight (12.1 +/- 1.7 vs. 17.8 +/- 1.7 mU/l, P = 0.030), compared with once-daily injection. Plasma glucose concentration overnight was higher with twice-daily compared with once-daily glargine (mean 9.0 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Blood glucose concentration rises in the late afternoon in association with falling plasma insulin levels towards the end of the 24-h period after insulin glargine injection in some people with Type 1 diabetes using once-daily glargine at dinner-time plus a rapid-acting insulin analogue at meal-times. This is prevented by twice-daily injection of insulin glargine.     

The post-prandial state in Type 2 diabetes and endothelial dysfunction: effects of insulin aspart.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, much attention has been focused on the possibility that the post-prandial state may be a cardiovascular risk factor in diabetes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the post-prandial state is associated with endothelial dysfunction in patients with diabetes and to explore the effect on this aspect of managing post-prandial hyperglycaemia by insulin aspart. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with Type 2 diabetes and 10 normal controls were recruited. In the diabetic patients two different tests were performed in each subject: a standard meal preceded by subcutaneous injection of soluble insulin (0.15 U/kg body weight) or of short-acting insulin aspart (0.15 U/kg body weight). These tests were designed to achieve different levels of post-prandial hyperglycaemia. Controls received a single standard meal test. Immediately before, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after each meal, blood glucose, triglycerides, free fatty acids and flow-mediated vasodilation were measured. RESULTS: Compared with regular insulin, insulin aspart significantly reduced the area under the curve for post-prandial hyperglycaemia (58.3 +/- 17.6 vs. 68.1 +/- 17.7; P<0.04), and preserved flow-mediated vasodilation, which was decreased in the post-prandial state (39.4 +/- 2.9 vs. 34.1 +/- 2.2; P<0.01). Triglyceride and free fatty acid levels were not differentially affected by the treatment. In normal controls the meal did not affect flow-mediated vasodilation. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the post-prandial state is accompanied by endothelial dysfunction in Type 2 diabetic patients and that insulin aspart improved endothelial function.     

Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro and aspart in healthy volunteers.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the rapid-acting insulin analogues lispro and aspart were compared in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 20 fasting healthy men following a single subcutaneous injection. Either insulin lispro or aspart, 0.05 U/kg-body-weight, was injected subcutaneously and followed by determination of 5-h profiles of plasma glucose, serum C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Lowest glucose concentrations were observed after 50 min in the aspart group (3.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l versus lispro 3.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; p = 0.026) and after 60 min in the lispro group (3.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l). For blood glucose t min was 59.3 +/- 3.4 min in the aspart and 63.5 +/- 5.3 min in the lispro group (ns). After 40 min a lower C-peptide was determined for aspart (225 +/- 21 pmol/l versus lispro 309 +/- 33 pmol/l; p = 0.031), whereas minimal C-peptide concentrations were reached in both groups after 105 min (lispro 117 +/- 21 pmol/l versus aspart 105 +/- 18 pmol/l). The maximal concentration of insulin was detected in both groups after 40 min (lispro 20.8 +/- 1.1 mU/l versus aspart 24.6 +/- 1.3 mU/l; p = 0.032). For insulin t max was 33.0 +/- 2.6 min in the aspart versus 33.3 +/- 2.6 min in the lispro group (ns). The present results indicate a more rapid absorption of insulin aspart in comparison to insulin lispro. Higher insulin concentrations after subcutaneus injection may be advantageous in meal-related treatment of diabetes.     

A comparison of mealtime insulin aspart and human insulin in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes patients

This randomized, open-label, cross-over study compares the efficacy of mealtime rapid-acting analog insulin aspart with human insulin, in combination with metformin. A total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled (HbA(1c)>7.5%) with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs), were assigned to human insulin 30 min before meals or aspart immediately before meals, both with metformin 500 mg t.i.d. for 90 days. Patients then switched to the alternate insulin. At 90 and 180 days, blood glucose and lipids were measured at baseline and every 30 min after test meals, for 3h. HbA(1c) and hypoglycemic events were also assessed. After 3 months, HbA(1c) was significantly reduced with aspart, but not human insulin (-0.4+/-0.7% versus +0.1+/-0.7%, p<0.05). During meal tests, blood glucose area under the curve (AUC) was significantly lower with aspart than human insulin (1240+/-476 min/mmol/l versus 1588+/-766 min/mmol/l, p<0.01). AUCs for lipids were similar for both treatments. Neither group experienced serious hypoglycemic events. These results encourage treatment with mealtime insulin aspart plus metformin, in type 2 diabetes patients with postprandial hyperglycemia inadequately controlled by OHAs alone.     

Improved glycaemic control with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro: a multicentre, randomized, cross-over trial in people with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare blood glucose control using insulin glargine + insulin lispro with that on NPH insulin + unmodified human insulin in adults with Type 1 diabetes managed with a multiple injection regimen. METHODS: In this 32-week, five-centre, two-way cross-over study, people with Type 1 diabetes (n = 56, baseline HbA1c 8.0 +/- 0.8%) were randomized to evening insulin glargine + mealtime insulin lispro or to NPH insulin (once- or twice-daily) + mealtime unmodified human insulin. Each 16-week period concluded with a 24-h inpatient plasma glucose profile. RESULTS: HbA1c was lower with glargine + lispro than with NPH + human insulin [7.5 vs. 8.0%, difference -0.5 (95% CI -0.7, -0.3) %, P < 0.001]. This was confirmed by an 8% lower 24-h plasma glucose area under the curve (AUC) (187 vs. 203 mmol l(-1) h(-1), P = 0.037), a 24% reduction in plasma glucose AUC > 7.0 mmol/l1 (47 vs. 62 mmol l(-1) h(-1), P = 0.017) and a 15% lower post-prandial plasma glucose AUC (75 vs. 88 mmol l(-1) h(-1), P = 0.002). There was no reduction in night-time plasma glucose AUC or increase in plasma glucose area < 3.5 mmol/l. Monthly rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reduced by 44% with glargine + lispro (0.66 vs. 1.18 episodes/month, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NPH insulin + unmodified human insulin, the combination of insulin glargine with a rapid-acting insulin analogue as multiple-injection therapy for Type 1 diabetes improves overall glycaemic control as assessed by HbA1c and 24-h plasma glucose monitoring to a clinically significant degree, together with a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycaemia.     

A comparison of insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes during Ramadan

OBJECTIVE: To compare insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 with regard to their effect on morning and evening postprandial glucose (PPG) control, and on average daily blood-glucose (BG), in patients with Type 2 diabetes who wish to fast during Ramadan. METHOD: Insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 were compared in an open-label, multicenter, randomised, crossover study involving 151 patients. Each treatment period had a duration of 14 days during which the patients self-monitored their BG before and 2 h after the main meals on any 3 days within the last 5 days of each treatment period. RESULTS: The 2 h PPG excursion following the main evening meal after sunset was significantly lower with insulin lispro Mix25 (3.4+/-2.9 mmol/l) compared with human insulin 30/70 (4.0+/-3.2 mmol/l, P=0.007). The evening pre-meal fasting BG values were also lower with insulin lispro Mix25 (7.1+/-2.2 mmol/l) versus human insulin 30/70 (7.5+/-2.6 mmol/l, P=0.034). The average daily BG concentration was 9.5+/-2.4 mmol/l during treatment with insulin lispro Mix25 versus 10.1+/-2.5 mmol/l with human insulin 30/70 given in identical doses (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: When compared with human insulin 30/70, treatment of insulin-requiring Type 2 patients with insulin lispro Mix25 during Ramadan resulted in better average daily glycaemia, and better BG control before and after the evening meal. Insulin lispro Mix25 should be considered as a therapeutic option during Ramadan.     

Insulin lispro (Lys(B28), Pro(B29) in the treatment of diabetes during the fasting month of Ramadan. Ramadan Study Group.

AIMS: To compare insulin lispro with soluble human insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan, with respect to the rate of hypoglycaemic episodes and postprandial blood glucose values after the main meal after sunset. METHODS: The insulins were compared in an open-label, randomized, cross-over study of 70 outpatients. Hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded by the patients in a self-monitoring diary. Fasting, 1-h and 2-h postprandial blood glucose values were recorded by the patient on three consecutive days at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: The fasting blood glucose values before sunrise (P>0.4) and after sunset (P>0.6) were similar and did not differ significantly between both treatment groups. The rise in blood glucose after the main meal after sunset was 3.0+/-0.4 mmol/l after 1 h in the insulin lispro treatment group compared to 4.3+/-0.4 mmol/l in the soluble insulin treatment group (P<0.01), and 2.6+/-0.4 mmol/l after 2h with insulin lispro compared to 4.0+/-0.5 mmol/l with soluble insulin (P<0.008). Mean hypoglycaemic episodes per patient over 14 days were 1.3+/-0.1 vs. 2.6+/-0.2, P<0.002, respectively, for insulin lispro and soluble insulin. Most hypoglycaemic episodes occurred during the time period from 6 h after the before sunrise meal until breaking the fast after sunset. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly lower rate of hypoglycaemic episodes combined with better control of postprandial blood glucose suggest insulin lispro may be more suitable prandial insulin for patients treated with Type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramadan.     

Insulin infusion normalizes fasting and post-prandial albumin and fibrinogen synthesis in Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: The effect of metabolic control on hepatic synthesis of plasma proteins in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), in the post-absorptive and post-prandial state, is not known. METHODS: We measured fractional synthetic rates (FSR) of albumin and fibrinogen in six insulin-infused T1DM patients and in five to nine control subjects, before and for approx. 4 h after a mixed liquid meal. Phenylalanine tracer precursor/product relationships and steady-state conditions were used. In the post-absorptive state, patients were studied in near euglycaemic conditions after an overnight intravenous insulin infusion. During the meal (approx. 11 kcal/kg), the insulin infusion rate was increased to maintain plasma glucose concentrations below approx. 10 mmol/l. RESULTS: Post-absorptive FSR of albumin (5.7 +/- 0.6%/day) and fibrinogen (11.3 +/- 0.6%/day) in T1DM were similar to control values (6.4 +/- 0.9 and 13.1 +/- 1.1, respectively). After the meal, albumin FSR increased (P = 0.0032 by anova) in both groups (T1DM, to 14.4 +/- 2.7%/day; controls, to 18.2 +/- 3.7%/day). Fibrinogen FSR also increased (P = 0.0048 by anova) in both the T1DM (to 18.2 +/- 2.6) and the control subjects (to 27.3 +/- 6.2). There was no difference between T1DM and control subjects in the post-prandial FSR of both proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin and fibrinogen FSR in T1DM can be maintained within near-normal ranges by insulin infusion under post-absorptive and post-prandial conditions.     

Insulin glargine in combination with nateglinide in people with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of adding nateglinide to therapy with insulin glargine in adults with Type 2 diabetes previously treated with insulin and with poor blood glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, people with Type 2 diabetes [n = 55, HbA(1c) 8.2 +/- 1.0 (+/- sd)%, duration of diabetes 12.8 +/- 6.0 years, duration of insulin treatment 6.0 +/- 4.0 years] were transferred to single bedtime injection of insulin glargine for a titration period of 4 weeks, and then randomized to nateglinide or matching placebo before meals in addition to insulin glargine. Metformin was continued if taken. Doses of insulin and oral medication were titrated to protocol for the treatment period of 12 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline-adjusted self-monitored capillary blood glucose concentration at 12 weeks was significantly lower with nateglinide + insulin glargine compared with placebo + insulin glargine after breakfast [difference -2.3 (95% confidence interval -4.4, -0.2) mmol/l, P = 0.030], before lunch [-2.5 (-4.6, -0.3) mmol/l, P = 0.029], and after lunch [-2.3 (-4.3, -0.4) mmol/l, P = 0.021], but not at other times. Baseline-adjusted HbA(1c) was not lower with nateglinide + insulin glargine as compared with placebo + insulin glargine [7.8 +/- 1.4 vs. 8.3 +/- 1.0%, difference -0.43 (-0.98, 0.12)%]. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of nateglinide before meals to once-daily insulin glargine in people with long-standing diabetes already requiring insulin therapy improves blood glucose control in the early part of the day after breakfast and lunch, but does not provide good control of blood glucose levels overall.     

Impaired flow-mediated vasoactivity during post-prandial phase in young healthy men

Impaired flow-mediated vasodilation in large arteries is an expression of endothelial dysfunction and an established marker of early atherosclerosis. Post-prandial lipemia can induce an impairment of the endothelial function. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of post-prandial phase on flow-mediated vasodilation in a group of ten young (23 +/- 2 years) healthy men without cardiovascular risk factors, who underwent an oral fat-loading test. Flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery and serum lipid profile were assessed under fasting conditions and 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after a high-fat meal. Triglycerides increased from 0.6 +/- 0.2 fasting to 1.1 +/- 0.5 and 1.3 +/-0.6 mmol/l at the 2nd and 4th hour (both P < 0.01), and decreased thereafter. Flow-mediated vasodilation fell significantly from 14.5 +/- 6.6% fasting to 3.5 +/- 1.5% and 4.0 +/- 2.2% at the 2nd and 4th hour (both P < 0.01), and returned to the basal values at the 6th and 8th hour. A strong inverse correlation was observed between the area under the incremental curve of post-prandial triglycerides (i.e. after subtraction of baseline triglycerides) and the area under the decremental curve of post-prandial flow-mediated vasodilation (r = -0.70, P = 0.025). No association was found between post-prandial vasodilation changes and fasting triglycerides, other lipid parameters or insulin. We conclude that a transient post-prandial impairment in brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation is evident in young healthy men after a high-fat meal, and is closely associated with triglyceride levels. These data provide support for a role of post-prandial phase in vascular regulation in young healthy subjects.     

Biphasic insulin aspart compared to biphasic human insulin reduces postprandial hyperlipidemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Premixed insulin analogues reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes in comparison to premixed regular insulin. Insulin also plays an important role in the regulation of postprandial lipid metabolism. It is known that increased levels of postprandial insulin reduce postprandial hyperlipemia but, on the other hand, no information exists with regard to the possible effect of insulin analogues in comparison to human insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 subjects (3 men; age 59 +/- 5 years; BMI 30.5 +/- 5.9 kg/m2, duration of diabetes 9 +/- 1 years, HbA1c 8.33 +/- 1.1 %) already on therapy with premixed insulin were treated either with biphasic human insulin (BHI30) or with biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) (1.3 IU fast acting insulin/12 g KH) in the setting of a standardized test meal. Serum levels of glucose, insulin, C-peptide and triglycerides as well as retinylpalmitate in plasma and chylomicron remnants were determined before and up to 8 hours after the meal. RESULTS: As was to be expected, therapy with BIAsp30 reduced the maximum increase of postprandial glucose from 7.10 +/- 2.00 mmol/l to 5.27 +/- 1.83 mmo/l (p = 0.007) compared to BHI30 insulin. In the same way, the maximum increase of triglycerides (from 2.33 +/- 1.03 to 1.65 +/- 0.69 mmol/l, p = 0.014) was reduced. The AUC 0 - 8 for triglycerides was not significantly influenced (34.20 +/- 19.86 vs. 31.46 +/- 16.21 mmol x 8 h/l) but the incremental area over baseline (AOB 0 - 8) was significantly reduced from 8.02 +/- 4.35 to 6.12 +/- 3.94 mmol x 8 h/l (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional human premixed insulin the prandial therapy with biphasic insulin aspart results not only in an improvement of glucose tolerance but also in a significant reduction of postprandial hyperlipemia.     

Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: This study compared the effect of insulin detemir on glycaemic control (HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose and variability thereof) with that of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn human isophane (NPH) insulin, both combined with insulin aspart, in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, and compared the safety of these treatments. METHODS: In this 26-week, open-label, randomized (2 : 1), parallel-group study, 347 (140 prepubertal and 207 pubertal) children with Type 1 diabetes, aged 6-17 years, received insulin detemir (n = 232) or NPH insulin (n = 115) once or twice daily, according to the prestudy regimen, plus premeal insulin aspart. RESULTS: The mean HbA(1c) decreased by approximately 0.8% with both treatments. After 26 weeks, the mean difference in HbA(1c) was 0.1% (95% confidence interval -0.1, 0.3) (insulin detemir 8.0%, NPH insulin 7.9%). Within-subject variation in self-measured fasting plasma glucose was significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (SD 3.3 vs. 4.3, P < 0.001), as was mean fasting plasma glucose (8.4 vs. 9.6 mmol/l, P = 0.022). The risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (22.00-07.00 h) was 26% lower with insulin detemir (P = 0.041) and the risk of 24-h hypoglycaemia was similar with the two treatments (P = 0.351). The mean body mass index (BMI) Z-score was lower with insulin detemir (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Basal-bolus treatment with insulin detemir or NPH insulin and premeal insulin aspart in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes mellitus improved HbA(1c) to a similar degree. The lower and more predictable fasting plasma glucose, lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and lower BMI observed with insulin detemir are clinically significant advantages compared with NPH insulin.     

Impaired subcutaneous absorption of insulin in 'brittle' diabetics

Twenty-four hour plasma free insulin and blood glucose and intermediary metabolite profiles have been measured in 6 C-peptide deficient 'brittle' diabetic patients, during continuous sc and im insulin infusion. During sc infusion free insulin profiles were erratic and unpredictable. Mean 24 h blood glucose levels were raised at 12.6 +/- 2.1 (SE) mmol/l, and 3-hydroxybutyrate at 0.24 +/- 0.08 mmol/l. Blood lactate (1.88 +/- 0.18 mmol/l) and glycerol (0.084 +/- 0.007) were also elevated. Insulin (im) restored free insulin profiles to the normal pattern as found in 'stable' diabetics on sc infusion, with characteristic post-meal peaks (49 +/- 7, 103 +/- 35, and 95 +/- 34 mU/l) and stable night-time levels. Mean 24 h blood glucose was 6.7 +/- 1.1 mmol/l (P less than 0-.05 compared to sc infusion) and 3-hydroxybutyrate 0.07 +/- 0.02 mmol/l (P less than 0.05). Blood lactate (1.67 +/- 0.08 mmol/l) and glycerol (0.10 +/- 0.02 mmol/l) levels remained abnormal. The ratio of plasma free insulin to insulin dose administered was significantly higher during im infusion. In the 6 'stable' diabetics on sc insulin infusion good blood glucose control (7.1 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) was accompanied by clear post-prandial insulin peaks, and stable nocturnal levels. The results strongly suggest that in one category of 'brittle' diabetics there is defective and erratic sc insulin absorption.     

Hyperinsulinaemia in offspring of Type 2 diabetic patients: impaired response of carbohydrate metabolism, but preserved cardiovascular response.

AIMS: To investigate the effects of endogenous insulin on haemodynamics in nine offspring of Type 2 diabetic patients (P), compared with 18 subjects without family history of diabetes (C), all with normal glucose tolerance. METHODS: All subjects underwent a 180-min oral glucose tolerance test with continuous blood pressure and ECG recording. Low-to-high frequency ratio (LF/HF), an index of the sympatho-vagal balance, was calculated by heart rate spectral analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, LF/HF correlated with fasting plasma insulin (r = 0.44, P < 0.03) and with insulin/glucose ratio (r = 0.46, P < 0.03). Plasma insulin, basally similar in the two groups, was significantly increased in P (342 +/- 34.2) when compared to C (177.6 +/- 25.2 pmol/l), P < 0.005 from time 30min onward. Blood glucose, also similar at baseline, remained not significantly different in P (5.74 +/- 0.25) vs. C (5.08 +/- 0.27 mmol/l), throughout the study. Diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased in P, but not in C during the first hour of the study. Finally, LF/HF ratio significantly increased in P (2.5 +/- 0.4 vs. C, 1.7 +/- 0.2) during the first hour. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the offspring of Type 2 diabetic patients with normal glucose tolerance display an increased insulin secretion; however, they are not resistant to the haemodynamic effects of insulin, as suggested by the reduction of diastolic blood pressure. This, in turn, may determine a chronic sympathetic activation, which could be involved in the pathogenesis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus injection therapy: a randomized cross-over trial under usual diabetic clinic conditions

Twelve C-peptide negative insulin-dependent diabetic patients participated in a randomized cross-over study of 6 months treatment with twice or thrice daily insulin injection therapy and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Standard, non-intensified management conditions were maintained throughout. Glycosylated haemoglobin levels were similar on both regimens (9.2 +/- 0.5% versus 9.0 +/- 0.4%; CSII vs injection therapy; (mean +/- SEM). Capillary blood glucose concentrations before breakfast (5.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/l vs 9.1 +/- 0.8 mmol/l), after lunch (6.5 mmol/l +/- 0.8 vs 7.9 +/- 1.0 mmol/l) and before the evening meal (5.0 +/- 0.7 mmol/l vs 7.7 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) were lower on CSII, as were 24-hour urine glucose excretion and total insulin dose (39.3 +/- 2.2 vs 49.8 +/- 4.0 U/day). There was a significant positive correlation between fasting blood glucose values and glycosylated haemoglobin on injection but not pump treatment. Thus although blood glucose control at some individual daytime points appeared lower on CSII, overall diabetic control was similar on the two regimens.     

Acute effect of orlistat on post-prandial lipaemia and free fatty acids in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Post-prandial lipaemia is prolonged and exaggerated in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, with an accumulation of atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants. We postulate that orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, may cause changes in post-prandial lipoprotein metabolism by reducing dietary triglyceride absorption. METHODS: The acute effect of a single dose of 120 mg orlistat on post-prandial glucose, lipids, remnant lipoproteins and free fatty acids (FFA) was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study of 63 overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (body mass index 30.4 +/- 3.8 kg/m2). Either a single dose of orlistat or placebo was given before a standard mixed meal containing 70 g of fat and plasma triglyceride (TG), remnant-like particles cholesterol (RLP-C) and FFA were sampled at 2-h intervals for 8 h. RLP-C was measured by an immunoseparation assay and FFA by an enzymatic colorimetric method. RESULTS: The concentrations of plasma TG (P < 0.0001), RLP-C (P = 0.003), and FFA (P < 0.0001) were significantly lower at 2 h after orlistat compared with placebo. Both plasma RLP-C (P = 0.04) and FFA (P < 0.0001) remained lower after orlistat than placebo at 4 h. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) above baseline fasting level for both TG and RLP-C was significantly more reduced after orlistat than placebo (iAUC-TG 5.8 (3.7-8.2) mmol/l x h-1 vs. 5.7 (4.1-10.9), respectively, P = 0.04; iAUC-RLP-C: 0.53 (0.23-1.04) mmol/l x h-1 vs. 0.56 (0.35-1.40), respectively, P = 0.02). The test meal was well tolerated by all subjects, with only three subjects reporting faecal urgency after orlistat. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat has a beneficial effect on post-prandial lipaemia in overweight Type 2 diabetic patients and lowers plasma TG, RLP-C and FFA in the early post-prandial period.     

Short-term metabolic effects of the ACE-inhibitor benazepril in type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with arterial hypertension.

To assess the short-term metabolic effects a long-acting non-sulphydryl ACE-inhibitor benazepril on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, 10 hypertensive diabetic patients treated with glibenclamide were studied in a double-blind, crossover fashion over two 10-day periods in which either benazepril (10 mg/day) or placebo was given. At the end of the 10 day treatment, both blood pressure and plasma glucose concentrations were lower after benazepril versus placebo (benazepril, blood pressure: 143 +/- 11/83 +/- 5 mmHg, plasma glucose: 7.1 +/- 1.2 mmol/l; placebo: blood pressure: 157 +/- 10/99 +/- 2 mmHg, plasma glucose: 8.2 +/- 1 mmol/l, p < 0.05). In response to an oral glucose tolerance test combined with 1 mg intravenous glibenclamide, plasma glucose levels were lower after benazepril versus placebo (0-460 min: 8.4 +/- 0.8 versus 10.5 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, p < 0.05), whereas plasma insulin, C-peptide and glibenclamide concentrations were not different. It is concluded that a short-term administration of benazepril in Type 2 diabetes mellitus reduces blood pressure and improves blood glucose control, most likely by decreasing insulin resistance.