Prognostic factors in resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate characteristics of primary colorectal cancer and pulmonary metastases in order to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and risk factors for further intrapulmonary recurrence after resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer were reviewed. The factors assessed were age, sex, pathological findings of the original colorectal cancer (depth, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph node metastasis, differentiation, Dukes' stage) and pulmonary metastasis (maximum tumour size, number of tumours, completeness of resection), serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, previous hepatectomy for liver metastases, and surgical procedure for resection of pulmonary metastasis. Overall survival and intrapulmonary recurrence were also reviewed. RESULTS: Survival rates after resection of pulmonary metastases were 78 per cent at 3 years and 56 per cent at 5 years. Solitary pulmonary metastases were significantly correlated with survival (P = 0.049). The pathological features of the primary colorectal cancer had no impact on survival. Histologically incomplete resection of pulmonary metastasis significantly correlated with pulmonary re-recurrence (P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival can be expected after complete resection of pulmonary metastases arising from colorectal cancer, especially in patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis.     

Influence of primary disease factors on outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases?

The outcome after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer is influenced not only by factors of metastatic lesions but also those of primary disease. To clarify whether primary disease factors are predictive of post-resection outcome of colorectal liver metastases, 180 patients (male : female = 114 : 66; 61.1 +/-10.5 yrs; synchronous: metachronous = 95 : 85; colon: rectum = 124 : 56 who underwent surgery of colorectal liver metastases in Cancer Institute Hospital from 1995 to 2005 were recruited for analysis. Post-resection outcome of the patients with colorectal liver metastases was significantly influenced by 1) depth of invasion, 2) grade of lymph node metastasis , 3) number of metastatic lymph nodes and 4) Dukes stage of primary disease. The patients with lymph node metastases further than grade 3 showed median survival time of less than 2 years and did not survive longer than 5 years. Thus such condition seemed not warrant resective treatment for liver metastases. In case of synchronous metastatic disease, primary disease information, such as lymph node metastases, depth of invasion, and Dukes stage, were significant predictive factors after hepatectomy. Meanwhile, such factors did not show significant influence in the patients with metachronous liver metastases. In conclusion, influence of primary disease factors should be considered for deciding the indication of hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases, especially when patients have synchronous lesions.     

影响结直肠癌肝转移手术切除患者预后的多因素分析

目的 探讨影响结直肠癌肝转移患者手术切除的预后因素。方法 收集1995-2001年间收治的结直肠癌肝转移手术切除患者103例的资料，用Kaplan-Meier法计算术后生存率，以Cox模型进行多变量分析。结果 患者术后1、3年无瘤生存率分别为73．8％和43．7％，术后1、3年累积生存率分别为7g．6％和49．5％。单因素分析显示：术前血清CEA水平、转移灶与原发灶的治疗间隔时间、术中切缘情况、肝门淋巴结转移、肝内卫星灶的存在与否、肝转移灶的最大直径、数目及有无包膜影响患者的术后肝内复发和术后累积生存率，而术后化疗可以提高患者的累积生存率。多因素分析显示：转移灶与原发灶的治疗间隔时间、切缘情况、肝内卫星灶的存在与否和肝转移灶的最大直径是影响肝内复发和累积生存率的独立因素，而肝门淋巴结转移是影响累积生存率的独立因素，有无包膜是影响肝内复发的独立因素。结论 手术切除是结直肠癌肝转移有效的治疗手段。转移灶与原发灶的治疗间隔时间、切缘情况、肝内卫星灶、肝转移灶的大小和包膜、肝门淋巴结转移等是患者预后的独立影响因素。     

Sequential resection of lung metastasis following partial hepatectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Multiple organ metastases from colorectal carcinoma may be considered incurable, but long survival after both liver and lung resection for metastases has been reported. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 48 patients who underwent lung resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1992 and 1999 was undertaken. Twenty-seven patients had lung metastasis alone, 15 had previous partial hepatectomy, and six had previous resection of local or lymph node recurrence. The relationship of clinical variables to survival was assessed. Survival was calculated from the time of first pulmonary resection. RESULTS: Five-year survival rates after resection of lung metastasis were 73 per cent in patients without preceding recurrence, 50 per cent following previous partial hepatectomy and zero after resection of previous local recurrence. Independent prognostic variables that significantly affected survival after thoracotomy were primary tumour histology and type of preceding recurrence. There was no significant difference in survival after lung resection between patients who had sequential liver and lung resection versus those who had lung resection alone. CONCLUSION: Sequential lung resection after partial hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer may lead to long-term survival.     

Surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastasis

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the long-term results of our approach, which consists of surgically treating every case in which radical resection of all metastatic disease was technically feasible. The indications for surgical resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer remain controversial. Several clinical risk factors have been reported to influence survival. Between 1980 and 2001, 304 patients underwent curative hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer at our institution. Survival rates and disease-free survival as a function of clinical and pathological determinants were examined retrospectively. The overall 3-, 5, 10-, and 20-year survival rates were 51%, 36%, 26%, and 25%, respectively. The stage of the primary tumor, lymph node metastasis, multiple nodules, a high preoperative CEA level and a short interval between treatment of the primary and metastatic tumors were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with 4 or more metastases had almost the same survival rate as those with 2 or 3 nodules. Extrahepatic metastases or invasion at hepatectomy did not worsen the survival rate if curatively resected. These results confirm that surgical resection is useful for treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer. While multiple metastases significantly impair patient prognosis, the life expectancy of patients with 4 or more nodules makes their resection mandatory.     

Surgery for colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Optimizing the results of treatment

Overall, hepatic resection appears to be an important means of curing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer isolated to the liver. The only absolute contraindication to surgery was the impossibility of a radical removal of tumor: if residual disease will remain after the hepatic resection, this operation is not indicated. A possible second contraindication to surgery is the presence of tumor in the hepatic or celiac lymph nodes. Such metastases from liver metastases signal a biologic grade of tumor that is almost sure to spread to other sites. However, one patient of the 25 in this group did survive long term when positive lymph node groups were dissected. Further clinical experience with this form of the disease along with trials of regional adjuvant therapies such as intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be needed. The presence of extrahepatic metastases at the time of liver resection should be considered a relative contraindication to this surgery, but if the patient can be made clinically disease free, long-term disease-free survival may result. It seems imperative that all patients with hepatic metastases be evaluated by an experienced hepatic surgeon for a curative resection. If the patient has between one and four metastases, a 25 per cent long-term disease-free survival rate can be expected. Patients who have a radical resection of more than four metastases should be considered to be in an experimental group in whom more data are needed. In our current state of knowledge, making such patients clinically disease free is their only chance for long-term survival. Other factors besides the number of metastases that will affect the prognosis of the patient include the disease-free interval between colorectal resection and liver resection, the pathologic margin of resection on the liver specimen, and the presence or absence of mesenteric lymph node metastases from the primary cancer. These factors should be considered when determining the prognosis in a given patient and should be used as stratification variables in prospective trials. However, from our analysis of available data, these factors should not be considered contraindications to hepatic resection.     

Role of repeated hepatectomy in the multimodal treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases

HYPOTHESIS: Multimodal treatment consisting of repeated hepatectomy and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for liver-confined recurrence of colorectal cancer can yield long-term survival comparable with that associated with primary hepatectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A prospective database at a tertiary referral cancer center. PATIENTS: Review of 274 consecutive liver resections identified 64 patients who underwent resection of hepatic colorectal metastases without ablation followed by adjuvant irinotecan hydrochloride- or oxaliplatin-based systemic chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Median and 5-year overall and disease-free survival after primary and repeated hepatectomy. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 40 months, median and 5-year overall survival after hepatectomy were 60 months and 53%, respectively; median and 5-year disease-free survival were 33 months and 25%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that less than 1 year between colectomy and liver resection (P = .001), more than 3 metastases (P = .001), no repeated hepatectomy (P = .01), and lymph node-positive primary colon cancer (P = .02) were independently predictive of worse survival. Of 28 patients (44%) with liver-confined recurrence, 19 (30%) underwent repeated hepatectomy; at median follow-up of 38 months, median and 5-year overall survival after repeated hepatectomy were 48 months and 44%, respectively. No risk factors were identified in multivariate analysis. In patients with recurrence, median and 5-year overall survival measured from primary hepatectomy were 70 months and 73%, respectively, with repeated hepatectomy vs 43 months and 43%, respectively, without repeated hepatectomy (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Multimodal treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer confined to the liver should begin with consideration of repeated hepatectomy.     

Pre-hepatectomy prognostic staging to determine treatment strategy for colorectal cancer metastases to the liver

Background Attempts at identifying prognostic factors after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases have not achieved consensus. We investigated prognostic factors ascertainable before hepatectomy for colorectal metastasis.Method Clinicopathological data for 149 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection of primary lesions and metastatic liver disease at one institution were subjected to multivariate analysis concerning metastatic status and the primary lesion.Results Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous carcinoma as the primary tumor (Poor/muc; P=0.026), marked vascular invasion by the primary tumor (V; P=0.002), bi-lobar liver metastases (P=0.048), and short doubling time (DT) of the liver tumor (P=0.028) were characteristics assessable before hepatectomy that independently indicated poorer survival. A four-stage classification based on these factors was related to overall (P<0.01) and disease-free (P<0.01) survival rates. No pattern of recurrence site was evident in stage I (patients with no risk factor). Recurrence was usually extrahepatic in stage IV (patients with Poor/muc) but favored the remnant liver in stage II (patients with bi-lobar metastases or short DT) or III (patients with V; P=0.037). Stage III showed more multiple and early hepatic recurrences than stage II, and repeat hepatectomy was less frequent (P<0.05).Conclusion Pre-hepatectomy prognostic staging should help to guide treatment of liver metastases.     

Interval Period Tumor Progression: Does Delayed Hepatectomy Detect Occult Metastases in Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases?

Background  Rapid remnant liver recurrence in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is occasionally experienced after simultaneous colorectal and liver resection. We evaluated the tumor progression during interval periods to determine whether delayed hepatic resection detects occult metastases. Methods  One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent hepatectomy for synchronous CRLM. Up to 2003, 116 patients underwent simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection. From 2004 onward, we identified 21 patients undergoing delayed hepatectomy for synchronous CRLM. The tumor progression during interval was determined by a dynamic computed tomography scan. Results  Median/mean interval between the two evaluations prior to the first and second surgery was 2/2.4 months. The median/mean number of metastases detected at each evaluation was 2/3.3 and 3/4.6, respectively. Nine of the 21 (43%) patients had new detectable metastatic lesions after reevaluation. For 11 of the 21 patients, it was necessary to reconsider planned surgical procedure which was determined prior to colorectal surgery. Hepatic disease-free survival was significantly different between patients undergoing delayed and simultaneous hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that the delayed hepatectomy was a significant independent prognostic factor in hepatic disease-free survival. Conclusion  Tumor progression was recognized and occult metastases were detected after the interval reevaluation. Delayed hepatectomy may be a useful approach to reduce rapid remnant liver recurrence in synchronous CRLM.     

Procedures of Choice for Resection of Primary and Recurrent Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Although liver resection offers the only realistic chance of cure for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer, no consensus exists as to the procedure of choice for managing these tumors. Data from 193 patients who underwent hepatectomy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer and 26 of 193 patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy for recurrent metastases were collected. The suitability of resection was evaluated retrospectively based on known risk factors for recurrence and patterns of recurrence. On multivariate analysis, a positive surgical margin (SM+) was the only risk factor for recurrence after the initial resection (p < 0.01). SM+ (p < 0.01) and nonanatomic resection (p < 0·05) that was less than a sectionectomy (p < 0.05) were risk factors for recurrence after repeat hepatectomy. Multiple tumors (four or more) was the most common pattern of recurrence after initial hepatectomy, and recurrence close to the line of resection was most common after repeat hepatectomy. Based on tumor doubling times, recurrence after initial hepatectomy seemed to originate from the primary colorectal lesion, whereas recurrence after repeat hepatectomy was derived from a hepatic metastasis. Retrospective analysis suggests that hepatectomy with clear surgical margins is more important than anatomic resection for initial hepatectomy, and at least sectionectomy is necessary for repeat hepatectomy.     

Treatment strategy for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer

Over the past 25 years, 125 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent 167 hepatectomies in our department. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after the initial hepatectomy were 90%, 58%, and 51%, respectively, and those after repeated hepatectomy were 88%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The predictive factors significantly associated with poor prognosis after initial hepatectomy were maximal diameter of metastasis (> or = 5 cm), distribution pattern in the liver (multiple bilobar), number of nodules (> or = four), and presence of extrahepatic metastases. A disease-free interval of > 6 months after initial hepatectomy was a significant factor for prolongation of survival after repeat hepatectomy. Patients with hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy did not receive a survival benefit from hepatectomy, while 5 patients underwent repeat hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy for remnant liver and hilar node metastases with a disease-free interval of > 8 months and 4 of them survived for > 5 years. Our treatment strategies for colorectal hepatic metastases are as follows: 1) hepatectomy is the first choice for < 4 liver metastases without extrahepatic disease; 2) a careful evaluation for liver resection is performed for patients with > or = 4 liver metastases receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy because of the high frequency of hepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy; 3) the presence of hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy should be excluded from surgical indications; 4) simultaneous single metastasis limited to the lung is an indication for lung resection; and 5) a suitable indication for repeat hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence is patients with a longer disease-free interval. Aggressive surgery based on the optimum patient selection can contribute to clinical benefit, including long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.     

Liver resection for colorectal metastases: the third hepatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk, the benefit, and the main factors of prognosis of third liver resections for recurrent colorectal metastases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recurrence following liver resection is frequent after a first as after a second hepatectomy. Second liver resections yield a similar survival to that obtained with first liver resection, but little is known about third hepatectomy. METHODS: This study reports a retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent a third liver resection for colorectal metastases in a 16-year experience (1984-2000). Patients were identified from a prospective database that collected 615 consecutive patients who cumulated 883 hepatectomies (615 first, 199 second, 60 thirds, and 9 fourths). Third hepatic resections were compared with first and second procedures, in terms of risk and benefit for the patient. Prognostic factors of survival after third hepatic resection were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A third hepatic resection was attempted in 68 of 115 of liver recurrences following a second hepatectomy (59%) and achieved in 88% of the cases (60 of 68). There was no intraoperative mortality or postoperative deaths within the 2 months. Fifteen patients developed postoperative complications (25%), a rate similar to that of first and second hepatectomies. Overall 5-year survival was 32% and disease-free survival was 17% after the third resection. Survival compared favorably to that of patients with recurrence following a second hepatectomy who could not be operated (5% at 3 years) or who failed to be resected (15% at 2 years, P = 0.0001). It also compared favorably to that of patients who underwent only two hepatectomies (5-year survival, 27%). When estimated from the time of first hepatectomy, survival was 65% at 5 years for the 60 patients who underwent three hepatic resections. Concomitant extrahepatic tumor was treated in 16 patients (27%) by 11 abdominal procedures and 5 pulmonary resections. By multivariate analysis, tumor size > 30 mm for first liver metastases, presence of extrahepatic tumor at second hepatectomy, and noncurative pattern of third liver resection were independent prognostic factors of reduced survival. CONCLUSIONS: Third hepatectomy is safe and provides an additional benefit of survival similar to that of first and second liver resections. It is worthwhile when curative and integrated into an intended multimodal strategy of tumoral eradication.     

Microscopic Liver Metastasis: Prognostic Factor for Patients with pT2 Gallbladder Carcinoma

Hepatic metastasis is the most frequent mode of recurrence of advanced gallbladder cancer after radical resection. The aims of this study were to clarify the clinical significance of microscopic liver metastasis from pT2 gallbladder cancer and to clarify whether partial hepatectomy can prevent hepatic recurrence in patients with microscopic liver metastasis. The subjects included 20 patients with pT2 tumors who underwent radical surgery and partial hepatectomy with lymph node dissection. Microscopic liver metastasis was defined as a distant metastatic nodule including cancer cell nests in the lumen of the portal vein and discrete nodular lesions in the liver, all less than 5 mm in diameter. Coxs proportional hazard regression was used to analyze factors that contributed to outcomes. Microscopic metastases were detected in the resected livers from 5 of 20 patients. There were more metastatic lesions within 1 cm of the gallbladder bed than were located 1 to 2 cm away from it. Microscopic liver metastases showed a strong correlation with the extent of blood vessel invasion around the primary tumor and were frequently detected in patients with a primary tumor localized on the hepatic side and with more than 3 cm of subserosal invasion. In four of five patients with microscopic liver metastases, recurrence was found in the remnant liver, which led to death within 15 months after the initial operation. Microscopic liver metastasis, operative curability, and lymph node metastasis were assessed as independent prognostic factors. A large proportion of patients with microscopic liver metastasis suffered from hepatic recurrence. Our results suggest that partial hepatectomy alone cannot prevent hepatic recurrence in patients with microscopic liver metastasis.     

Repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to delineate the role of surgery for recurrent colorectal cancer in the liver and to identify prognosticators for better patient selection and outcome. METHODS: Data from 90 repeat hepatectomies (second = 75; third = 12; fourth = 3) for recurrent colorectal cancer were collected. RESULTS: After the second hepatectomy, the 3-and 5-year survival rates were 48% and 31%, respectively. Twenty-seven percent (20 of 75) of patients are alive without recurrence after a median follow-up of 27 months, and 9 survived more than 5 years. Four or more tumors, positive regional lymph node metastases, concomitant extrahepatic disease, and residual tumor were independent poor prognostic factors after the second hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatectomy should be applied for recurrent colorectal cancer, when curative removal of the tumor is possible, although the benefit from treatment was limited in a patient with regional lymph node metastases, 4 or more metastases, or extrahepatic disease.     

Influence of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases may be influenced by the patient, the primary tumour and the liver metastases. Postoperative morbidity is associated with poor survival in several cancers. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate prognostic factors of survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases, including postoperative morbidity. METHODS: From 1985 to 2000, 311 consecutive patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer underwent resection with curative intent. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the influence of age, sex, site and stage of the colorectal tumour, disease-free interval, number, size and distribution of metastases, type of hepatectomy, pedicular clamping, resection margin, blood transfusion, postoperative morbidity and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 3 and 30 per cent respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 53 and 36 per cent respectively. Both overall and disease-free survival rates were independently associated with nodal status of the colorectal tumour, number of metastases and postoperative morbidity. Patients with postoperative morbidity had an overall and disease-free 5-year survival rate half that of patients with no morbidity: 21 versus 42 per cent for overall survival (P < 0.001) and 12 versus 28 per cent for disease-free survival (P = 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival can be altered by postoperative morbidity after resection of colorectal liver metastases by increasing the risk of tumour recurrence. This justifies optimizing the surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases to decrease postoperative morbidity and the use of efficient adjuvant treatments in patients with postoperative morbidity.     

Long-term results of surgical resection of locally advanced colorectal carcinoma

This study was undertaken to review the long-term results of multivisceral resection of locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Between 1964 and 1980, 1042 patients underwent exploratory surgery for colorectal cancer. Of these, 58 patients (5.5%) underwent curative multivisceral resection for suspected contiguous invasion by the primary tumor. Follow-up was complete for all patients. The primary tumors were located in the rectum (38 patients), sigmoid (9 patients), left colon (6 patients), and right colon (5 patients). En bloc resection of other viscera included uterus, adnexa, bladder, vagina, small intestine, abdominal wall, liver, stomach, kidney, and ureter. The operative morbidity and mortality rates were 31% and 1.7%, respectively. Resection margins were free of tumor in 54 patients. In the four patients with tumor-positive resection margins, recurrence of disease was evident between 8 and 22 weeks after surgery (mean survival time, 8.2 months). Carcinomatous invasion of the resected contiguous organ was confirmed in 49 patients (84%). The mean survival time for patients without lymph node metastases was 100.7 months, but it was only 16.2 months (p less than 0.01) for patients with lymph node metastases. Actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients without lymph node metastases was 76% (36 of 47 patients). None of the patients (0 of 11) with lymph node metastases survived for 5 years. Three of 36 of the 5-year survivors experienced recurrence of disease before the seventh postoperative year; no cancer-related deaths occurred between 7 and 25 years. These data suggest that survival in locally advanced colorectal carcinoma is more dependent on lymph node status than on the extent of local invasion. Effective disease control associated with survival in the long term can be achieved by multivisceral resection.     

Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

The utility of repeat hepatectomy for patients with colorectal metastases to the liver was sought. A complete review of the results of surgical treatment of patients having a repeat hepatectomy was presented. Then, the data on 170 patients in whom multiple clinical variables had been tabulated were selected for special study. These statistical analyses showed that there were no special clinical features present at the time of primary resection of the large bowel cancer that could distinguish these patients. There were some differences in the clinical features of these patients at the time of first and second liver resections. The disease-free interval, method of diagnosis, presence of extrahepatic disease, incidence of complete resection, and postoperative morbidity showed significant differences. The 5-year survival of the group as a whole was 32%. Only those clinical features which involved the completeness of cancer resection had a significant impact on survival. To optimize selection for a long-term survival, no extrahepatic disease should be present and the second hepatectomy should involve removal of all visible tumor. Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases was thought to be justified if the patient was made clinically disease-free, because surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment. The repeat hepatectomy was relatively safe with a low morbidity and conferred a 32% long-term survival. Received for publication on Aug. 30, 1998; accepted on Nov. 2, 1998     

Surgical management of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases

The optimal treatment for recurrent lesions after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is controversial. We report the outcome of aggressive surgery for recurrent disease after the initial hepatectomy and the influence on quality of life of such treatment. Forty-five (70%) of the 64 surviving patients developed recurrence after the initial hepatectomy for liver metastases. The determinants of hepatic recurrence were the distribution and the number of liver metastases. Twenty-eight (62%) of patients with recurrence underwent resection. A second hepatectomy was performed in 20 patients, and a third hepatectomy was done in 5 patients. Ten patients with pulmonary metastasis underwent partial lung resection on 14 occasions, while resection of brain metastases was performed in 3 patients on 5 occasions. There were no operative deaths after resection of recurrent disease. The morbidity rate was 28% after repeat hepatectomy, 21% after pulmonary resection, and 0% after resection of brain metastasis. The Karnofsky performance status (PS) after the last surgery was not significantly different from that after the initial hepatectomy. The 3- and 5-year survival rates after the second hepatectomy were 54% and 14%, respectively. The 3-and 5-year survival rates of the patients undergoing resection of extrahepatic recurrence were both 17%. The survival rate after resection of recurrent disease (n=28) was significantly better than that of patients (n=17) with unresectable recurrence (P < 0.05). For the 66 patients with colorectal liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate after initial hepatectomy was 50%. The distribution and the number of liver metastases and the presence of extrahepatic disease, as single factors, significantly affected prognosis after the initial hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the presence of extrahepatic metastasis and a disease-free interval of less than 6 months were independent predictors of survival after the initial and second hepatectomy, respectively. It is concluded that aggressive surgery is an effective strategy for selected patients with recurrence after initial hepatectomy. Careful selection of candidates for repeat surgery will yield increased clinical benefit, including long-term survival.     

Intra-operative Blood Loss Predicts Complications After a Second Hepatectomy for Malignant Neoplasms

Objective We investigated the risk of morbidity after repeat resections for liver recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma or for colorectal liver metastases. Background Data Although repeat hepatectomy for recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma or for colorectal cancer liver metastases is well known only to carry risks similar to those seen for an initial liver resection, the safety of such a procedure is questionable because, typically, only a few liver tumors are thought suitable for repeat hepatectomy. Methods Clinicopathology data were available for 412 hepatectomy patients (hepatocellular carcinoma in 226, colorectal liver metastases in 186). Risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed retrospectively among the 57 patients undergoing a repeat hepatectomy. Results Using multivariate analysis, intraoperative blood loss (relative risk, 9.61; P = 0.02) affected the occurrence of postoperative complications after a second hepatectomy. In patients who lost more than 1.29 l blood intraoperatively at the second hepatectomy, a major hepatectomy (P < 0.05) by means of an anatomical type of resection (P < 0.01) was more often performed than in the patients with 1.29 l or less of blood loss. Conclusions The major independent risk factor associated with complications after a second hepatectomy for liver recurrence was intraoperative blood loss. The extent of liver resection, especially in an anatomical manner, directly influences the amount of blood loss.     

Hepatic resection for breast cancer metastases

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic resection is an established modality of treatment for colorectal cancer metastases. Resection of breast cancer liver metastases remains controversial, but has been shown to be an effective treatment in selected cases. This study reports the outcome of 8 patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. PATIENTS & METHODS: 8 patients with liver metastases from previously treated breast cancer were referred for hepatic resection between September 1996 and December 2002. Six were eligible for liver resection. The mean age was 45.8 years. The resections performed included 1 segmentectomy and 5 hemihepatectomies of which one was an extended hemihepatectomy. One patient had a repeat hepatectomy 44 months after the first resection. RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths or major morbidity. The resectability rate was 75%. Follow-up periods range from 6 to 70 months with a median survival of 31 months following resection. There have been 2 deaths, one died of recurrence in the residual liver at 6 months and one died disease-free from a stroke. Of the remaining 4 patients, 1 has had a further liver resection at 44 months following which she is alive and ''disease-free'' at 70 months. The one patient with peritoneal recurrence is alive 49 months after her liver resection with 2 patients remaining disease-free. CONCLUSION: Hepatic resection for breast cancer liver metastases is a safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality.